"Brilliant" plans to win WWII: How Germany planned to win the Battle of Atlantic?

During World War II Germany attempted to defeat the Great Britain by sinking its merchant fleet with its U-boat arm. This drew it into a prolonged struggle for technological supremacy with the Allies. The video discusses how new weapons and technologies influenced the Battle of Atlantic.
Patreon: / eastory
Sources:
1) Uboat.net
2) Wikipedia
3) John Keegan - Intelligence in War: Knowledge of the Enemy from Napoleon to Al-Qaeda (2003)
4) Jonathan Dimbleby - The Battle of the Atlantic : how the allies won the war (2016)
0:32 - The Enigma Machine:
Enigma Machine at the Imperial War Museum, London.
Photo: Karsten Sperling commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...
0:48 - Map of the Atlantic - Google Maps.
1:15 - Helmet decal of Kriegsmarine.
Users Lancaster and F l a n k e r.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kriegsm...
1:20 - Flag of the Admiralty Board.
User: Wally Wiglet.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiral...
1:21 - Flag of the United Kingdom.
User: Anomie.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fl...
02:02 - XCOM: Enemy Unknown autopsy scene.
02:14 - Minesweeper.
02:29 (and later) - Locations of ships sunk by the Axis - uboat.net.
uboat.net/allies/merchants/
Graph - Goal - 300 000 tonnes per month. Statistics -
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Losses_...
03:42 - Typex cipher machine.
The Crypto Museum.
www.cryptomuseum.com/crypto/uk...
04:40 - Graph "New goal" - 700 000 tonnes per month
08:13 - U.S. Navy diagram of a Type XXI U-boat.
User: Megapixie.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_XX...

Пікірлер: 1 600

  • @gamer7234
    @gamer72344 жыл бұрын

    When you max out the tech tree and immediately lose the game

  • @duckquack8562

    @duckquack8562

    4 жыл бұрын

    Ikr its so ANNOYING

  • @liberator101

    @liberator101

    4 жыл бұрын

    I either overinvest into tech or into army, it's so hard to balance.

  • @economicapple2609

    @economicapple2609

    3 жыл бұрын

    HOI4

  • @pivotp0int530

    @pivotp0int530

    3 жыл бұрын

    I almost never invest into navy tech until 41 or later

  • @sonicvenom8292

    @sonicvenom8292

    3 жыл бұрын

    Another factor in the war is America began making thousands of liberty and other types of ships during the war, which lessened the effect of sinking the same amount of ships.

  • @FuriousIdea
    @FuriousIdea5 жыл бұрын

    Just spam fighters and naval bombers over the english channel so you can naval invade, works in hoi4

  • @CommanderToad307

    @CommanderToad307

    5 жыл бұрын

    Tabourda mate it was a joke about a video game called Hearts of Iron 4 calm it down

  • @FuriousIdea

    @FuriousIdea

    5 жыл бұрын

    ^this Its a joke man lol

  • @Atesz222

    @Atesz222

    5 жыл бұрын

    Calm your tits down man, geez... that was a game reference...

  • @garret16

    @garret16

    5 жыл бұрын

    Tabourba You're an Idiot

  • @fulcrum2951

    @fulcrum2951

    5 жыл бұрын

    R/wooosh

  • @aml-zq5mc
    @aml-zq5mc6 жыл бұрын

    Wow the technology back then was very impressive.

  • @bp837

    @bp837

    6 жыл бұрын

    You just had to go there, didn't you? There is no German race, numnuts.

  • @witty2898

    @witty2898

    6 жыл бұрын

    Geras Al-Aqras muslim

  • @witty2898

    @witty2898

    6 жыл бұрын

    Geras Al-Aqras get rid of u libtards

  • @majungasaurusaaaa

    @majungasaurusaaaa

    6 жыл бұрын

    War certainly does drive weapon innovation. Now in peace time our digital tech has made incredible progress. But our firearms, aircrafts and tanks are still that of 20 years ago. Many countries are still using older stuff than that.

  • @dwarvensphere1094

    @dwarvensphere1094

    6 жыл бұрын

    Its the reason you see such an explosion in technology avaliable to the public between 1945 and 1975. There was such a large investment in R&D (Especially for the British and Americans who always had the upperhand in technology throughout the war) during the war it almost doubled the rate of technological advancement

  • @NoFlu
    @NoFlu6 жыл бұрын

    Who would win: Highly advanced submarines which only need to go above water to refuel every so often, firing highly advanced torpedos, automatically going for the loudest thing around. Or 2 pipes and a very bright flashlight

  • @fulcrum2951

    @fulcrum2951

    6 жыл бұрын

    NoFlu frying

  • @NoFlu

    @NoFlu

    6 жыл бұрын

    fulcrum 29 Mate, did you never consider the tactical advantages of deep frying every torpedo you use?

  • @seanmac1793

    @seanmac1793

    6 жыл бұрын

    damn that's advanced tactics

  • @fulcrum2951

    @fulcrum2951

    6 жыл бұрын

    Cant disagree with that

  • @jebise1126

    @jebise1126

    6 жыл бұрын

    such submarine would not need acoustic torpedo. actually type XXI could go under convoy and shoot torpedoes under it so it would just avoid escort. but by that time battle was already lost anyway.

  • @SilentArrow2001
    @SilentArrow20016 жыл бұрын

    I got a counter to you’re counter of my counter that was countering your counter that was set to counter my counter

  • @icecold1805

    @icecold1805

    6 жыл бұрын

    Call of Duty: Counter warfare.

  • @Chrinik

    @Chrinik

    6 жыл бұрын

    That's actually the reason why technologic development skyrockets during wartime, because everybody tries to leapfrog each other and counter enemy tech. Compare the technological levels in 1939 and 1945 and you will find it has advanced by several magnitudes.

  • @a-drewg1716

    @a-drewg1716

    6 жыл бұрын

    same with WWI where all of the technological advancements in just airplane technology went from still basically gliders in 4 years to basically fully functioning airplanes but then in the interwar periods almost no technological advancements were really made and pretty much WWI era planes where still being used but then by the end of WWII we had practically had jet fighters.

  • @willbrown3694

    @willbrown3694

    6 жыл бұрын

    Stoßtruppen the jet fighter was invented in WW2

  • @a-drewg1716

    @a-drewg1716

    6 жыл бұрын

    I know, Germany used some very basic jet fighters as bomber killers but not as what we know as jet fighters today

  • @Epicalogical
    @Epicalogical6 жыл бұрын

    S C H N O R K E L

  • @lbn5715

    @lbn5715

    4 жыл бұрын

    dumb af. in german its called schnorchel and in english its snorkel, so its wrong from both ways.

  • @patriotgames1000

    @patriotgames1000

    4 жыл бұрын

    Engage the super special schnorchel , ve are under ver tack.

  • @DonnaChamberson

    @DonnaChamberson

    4 жыл бұрын

    SCH NOR KLË

  • @luftwaffle4327

    @luftwaffle4327

    4 жыл бұрын

    Germany, the maker of a meme

  • @KvNoWs
    @KvNoWs5 жыл бұрын

    Who would win: A promising strategy with high technology that dumbfounded the allied countries Or Low tide

  • @SephirothRyu

    @SephirothRyu

    4 жыл бұрын

    The lower tech solution is not to be underestimated. The USA should learn from this.

  • @1158supersiri

    @1158supersiri

    4 жыл бұрын

    Allied developed high technology as well- Their Sonar was better, there was the Manhattan project....

  • @ahsanimam73

    @ahsanimam73

    4 жыл бұрын

    KVN You dunno about radar?

  • @xXCRiETXx

    @xXCRiETXx

    4 жыл бұрын

    imagine how the german pilot must have felt, after he dropped the bomb on the low tide :D

  • @fishfashfosh
    @fishfashfosh5 жыл бұрын

    Germany: "We've got just a weapon for you, English!" Britain: "We've got a counter for it." Germany: "We've got just a weapon for you, English!" Britain: "We've got a counter for it" Germany: "We've got just a weapon for you, English!" Britain: "We've got a counter for it" Germany: "We've got just a weapon for you, English!" Britain: "Alright just stop."

  • @neieduardodepaula4556

    @neieduardodepaula4556

    4 жыл бұрын

    When did Britain say "Alright just stop"?... That corresponds to what time or event in World War II?

  • @fishfashfosh

    @fishfashfosh

    4 жыл бұрын

    Nei Eduardo De Paula It was a joke literally about country having their own consciousness and interacting like a human being please don’t take it seriously

  • @fahad_hassan_92

    @fahad_hassan_92

    Жыл бұрын

    @@neieduardodepaula4556 End of World War II

  • @VRichardsn
    @VRichardsn6 жыл бұрын

    The comic script and the funny drawings hide underneath a very deep understanding of WW II. Usually when I am watching a new historic channel for the first time I pay special attention to try and find common myths in order to gauge the capabilities of the creator, but with this one I could find no weakness. Bravo. Subscribed.

  • @pjolex5896

    @pjolex5896

    10 ай бұрын

    Yeah I do exactly the same

  • @negvey
    @negvey6 жыл бұрын

    thumbs up for the battleships > Destroyers >submarines... no other youteber has ever pointed this out, its so good to learn new things

  • @PyromancerRift

    @PyromancerRift

    6 жыл бұрын

    This is the basics of war. No perfect weapon, only perfect targets and perfect counters.

  • @mazditzo

    @mazditzo

    6 жыл бұрын

    wargaming does that hhh

  • @Raviollius

    @Raviollius

    6 жыл бұрын

    Don't worry, carriers made all that shit meaningless.

  • @despacitooof557

    @despacitooof557

    5 жыл бұрын

    Simple History 😑

  • @hedgehog3180

    @hedgehog3180

    5 жыл бұрын

    I mean it's really not that simple, cruisers are better suited for fighting destroyers but still it's more like a well balanced fleet will beat a poorly balanced one. If you just send 1 battleship against a group of destroyers the battleship will probably be overwhelmed, as happened during WWII. And a single submarine also wont be a perfect counter to a battleship. Really the best counter to a battleship is another battleship. So what you need to do is create a fleet where you have battleships which can counter the enemies battleship, cruisers to keep your battleships safe and help with air cover, destroyers to further assist with air cover and to screen and hunt down enemy ships. If all of these work in tandem you can create an effective fleet which can use it's battleship optimally and keep them safe.

  • @martontinkovay5024
    @martontinkovay50246 жыл бұрын

    Too much Hearts of Iron 4...

  • @carterschwalb6252

    @carterschwalb6252

    6 жыл бұрын

    *stages Islamic coup in Guatemala*

  • @HabboCoolcattim

    @HabboCoolcattim

    6 жыл бұрын

    Alexander Romanov shit game

  • @christopherg2347

    @christopherg2347

    6 жыл бұрын

    @Headhunter_FRANK: Germany was not exactly a naval power by any definition of hte word. The navy was geared entirely towards this plan, wich was about the best it could manage. For a proper Invasion of Britain or even the US, we would have needed to develop a entirely new Navy focussing on Surface Vessels.

  • @x-fun3149

    @x-fun3149

    6 жыл бұрын

    Everyone knows the trick is to just strengthen those three strategic regions and watch

  • @BlueDragon257257

    @BlueDragon257257

    6 жыл бұрын

    Alexander Romanov g

  • @marcocappelli2236
    @marcocappelli22366 жыл бұрын

    This makes me remember a book about WW1's flying machines. There it explained how any tiny tecnological advantage could have serious consequencies, like a system that made machineguns fire through the propellers at the right time and gave the pilots a higher kill score, or a tiny modification that made a plane more maneurable, or allowed it to rise/lower faster. Or a stronger engine that allowed them to actually carry guns, as their only purpose at the time was as reconnosaince, and pilots would be issued rifles as their only defence. One german plane was even forced to land as allied ones literally pushed it down to the ground. They were clunky machines that no one knew how to pilot, and were seen by the higher ups as tanks were seen in WW2: something new they didn't understand. Any new invention could give such superiority, but only for a short time until it was countered by tactics or some other tecnology. This is evolution at it's finest.

  • @JStamato
    @JStamato4 жыл бұрын

    Essentially: One Side: We have a new Weapon. Other Side: We have a counter. One Side: Now we have a better new weapon Other Side: Now we have a better counter. And Repeat

  • @vadanevadas6960
    @vadanevadas69605 жыл бұрын

    You censored the swastika: 0:30 Uncensored swastika: 1:18 CONSISTENCY EASTORY!

  • @krisfrederick5001

    @krisfrederick5001

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yeah I noticed that it was in and out too, it's not like we don't know what it looks like, you're not protecting anyone.

  • @Euan_Miller43

    @Euan_Miller43

    4 жыл бұрын

    Kris Frederick helps for German audiences

  • @user-sm8us5yt9h

    @user-sm8us5yt9h

    4 жыл бұрын

    it helps with demonetization on KZread to censor the swastika

  • @Mic_Glow

    @Mic_Glow

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@user-sm8us5yt9h censoring history is a great way for it to repeat in the future. Don't help youtube making a mistake.

  • @michaelibrahim9275

    @michaelibrahim9275

    4 жыл бұрын

    Mic_Glow They’re not censoring history, just a symbol

  • @broefkip
    @broefkip6 жыл бұрын

    Minor historical inaccuracy, the Polish had begun attempting to crack Enigma before the war even started they had seized a machine and sent it too Britain allowing them to join (and later continue after poland fell) effort. Later the British had captured an encrypter from a Uboat allowing them to succesfully decrypt the code

  • @a-drewg1716

    @a-drewg1716

    6 жыл бұрын

    well no the Poles did break the enigma code but the code was upgraded

  • @miroslawkaras7710

    @miroslawkaras7710

    6 жыл бұрын

    Polish did not attempting to crack Enigma, they did crack Enigma, and give the method to French and British in August of 1939. Polish also build automated decipher system called "bomb" to speed up the process (manual decoding took 3 days). Polish build 6 bomb that work in tandem, however over time that become insufficient as German encryption become more complex and it required 60 Bombs. That wa beyond capability of Polish team at that time. Once they give the plans to British secret service, that work was continue by Alan Turing and his team. Even the name "Bomb" wa conceive by Polish cipher group of Mariana Rejewskiego, Jerzego Różyckiego and Henryka Zygalskiego

  • @jebise1126

    @jebise1126

    6 жыл бұрын

    poles never cracked naval enigma.

  • @Surv1ve_Thrive

    @Surv1ve_Thrive

    6 жыл бұрын

    The Poles bought a machine I read. Enigma was sold on the (,fairly) open market before ww2.

  • @jebise1126

    @jebise1126

    6 жыл бұрын

    i believe very similar machine was used in german trade navy. if not the same.

  • @lukekinder4959
    @lukekinder49595 жыл бұрын

    Honestly this is fascinating. It just goes to show that you can spend hundreds of hours learning about WWII and still only scratch the surface.

  • @flare_0532
    @flare_05326 жыл бұрын

    how does this have only 1k views

  • @scottiebarnes21

    @scottiebarnes21

    6 жыл бұрын

    Flare _053 every one that could have watched has been sunk.

  • @anthonywilson8366

    @anthonywilson8366

    6 жыл бұрын

    Flare _053 people like being ignorant.... But its up to 31k now

  • @flare_0532

    @flare_0532

    6 жыл бұрын

    yeah, it exploded quite quickly tbh

  • @clausejoke1985

    @clausejoke1985

    6 жыл бұрын

    @Anthony Wilson "people like being ignorant." Do you even realize how childish and arrogant you sound? Everyone who has not seen this video is ignorant? Work on your disgusting attitude.

  • @jackhollaar2467

    @jackhollaar2467

    6 жыл бұрын

    because there is no part 3 or 4

  • @adrianruhl8361
    @adrianruhl83616 жыл бұрын

    fun fact about the type 21 after the war a brewery in frankfurt bought some unused hulls and now cider is made in them.

  • @sergiojuanmembiela6223
    @sergiojuanmembiela62235 жыл бұрын

    The Germans did not as much "chose" to wage a submarine war as they were forced to. Building a fleet could take a decade, building a fleet capable of overpowering the Royal Navy would last even more. And of course, the British, who already had enough shipyards to build a big fleet, would have kept increasing their navy while Germany was building its. Germany simply could not hope to win a naval arms race with England so the submarine blockade (and the air attack that failed during the Battle of Britain) were its only shots.

  • @touristguy87

    @touristguy87

    4 жыл бұрын

    You're an idiot. The Nazis built subs because they were difficult to detect and destroy and because they were disproportionately effective against large surface ships. Plain and simple. Anti-shipping fighter bombers were even more disproportionately effective and that is why the US built a carrier fleet. The Germans never did so because they simply never had the ability to even construct carriers without having them destroyed mid-construction. Not to mention large surface ships...all of which were built before the war started. You literally have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

  • @buster117
    @buster1176 жыл бұрын

    Awesome, thank you very much this explained to me the Atlantic war and the German plan , keep up the good work

  • @varovaro1967
    @varovaro19676 жыл бұрын

    What an extraordinary brief history of the Battle of the Atlantic! Congratulations!

  • @mickmickymick6927
    @mickmickymick69276 жыл бұрын

    "To bring down the British Empire" *shows a tiny part of the empire as well as a completely different country.*

  • @itsmealex8959

    @itsmealex8959

    5 жыл бұрын

    He doesn't recognize the continental Congress as a legit authority and believes that the colonies still belong to Britain.

  • @crunch9876

    @crunch9876

    5 жыл бұрын

    lol what part of the vid is this?

  • @johnballs1352

    @johnballs1352

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@itsmealex8959 Freedom or Death!

  • @aloynium
    @aloynium3 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video, detailed and informative but not too draining. Hope you can make more of such videos in addition to your other ones. The script of the videos is very quick and smooth.

  • @mrmr297
    @mrmr2976 жыл бұрын

    0:56 I want to make a version of rock, paper, scissors were it's battleship, destroyer, submarine.

  • @ShahjahanMasood
    @ShahjahanMasood6 жыл бұрын

    This series will forever join my favorites Playlist

  • @jaquestrap
    @jaquestrap6 жыл бұрын

    The "special operations" you said the British used to get their hands on the enigma machine were actually copies constructed by the Poles and gifted to the British (and French) in 1938. The Poles had already broken the Enigma technology prior to the start of the War, using the skills of several brilliant Polish mathematicians, and had been listening to German communications until the Germans added some extra complexity to the machines (adding two extra rotors, which would necessitate 10 times the manpower of deciphering on the part of the Poles) which the Poles simply lacked the funds to overcome. The British worked off of the initial Polish breakthrough. To quote Gordon Welchman (who would become the head of the project to overcome German Army and Airforce Enigma ciphers): "Hut 6 Ultra would never have gotten off the ground if we had not learned from the Poles, in the nick of time, the details both of the German military version of the commercial Enigma machine, and of the operating procedures that were in use." Seems like you could have given a small reference to the Poles right there, given how critical they were to the Allied efforts to overcome the Enigma cypher, and how their tremendous role in this piece of WWII history is constantly overlooked for seemingly no apparent reason other than to attribute "single-handed" credit to the British for accomplishing what was in reality, a joint Allied effort.

  • @JakubB2000

    @JakubB2000

    6 жыл бұрын

    History is written by the victors, Poland was one of the countries that lost the most in ww2 and then they got stuck behind the iron curtain for the next 40 - 50 years. Thanks to that many accomplishments made by the Poles are ignored.

  • @MarkTheMorose

    @MarkTheMorose

    5 жыл бұрын

    Not to take anything away from the Polish successes in early breakthroughs in Enigma, but check out the stories of the U-110, U-570, and U-559, among others, to which I'm sure the video poster was referring. Back to the Polish, though, to remember that - as I recall - some of the Polish team who'd broken Enigma were captured by the Germans, but did not reveal anything that they knew, despite what they must have suffered.

  • @ralphraffles1394

    @ralphraffles1394

    5 жыл бұрын

    How did the Poles not decipher the messages detailing the German invasion of Poland? Or perhaps they did?

  • @fulcrum2951

    @fulcrum2951

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@JakubB2000 history was not written by the victors There's hundreds of articles praising the poles for breaking the enigma yet you claimed no one ever praised them

  • @dellylul5126

    @dellylul5126

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@ralphraffles1394 because they know that germas will attack them so why they needed to break informations about the german will attack them? Piłsudski know that there will be polish-german war in 33 :/

  • @whiteelephant3673
    @whiteelephant36736 жыл бұрын

    This is soooo great, I've learned so much new, thank you, please keep the content up!

  • @mjameshenry
    @mjameshenry6 жыл бұрын

    Thank you for making this video. I learned so much from it.

  • @Papageno6666
    @Papageno66665 жыл бұрын

    Love how you said Schnorkel

  • @Fish280492
    @Fish2804924 жыл бұрын

    I like how he said "allies got there act together and in acted the convoy system" more like the American's finally listened to the British and in acted the convoy system

  • @mathieugariepy2948
    @mathieugariepy29485 жыл бұрын

    Great series! I look foward to the next episode

  • @icecold1805
    @icecold18056 жыл бұрын

    Great, great analysis. I love the end, drawing conclusions of why this submarine warfare was just inneficient. Excelent work.

  • @BlitzOfTheReich
    @BlitzOfTheReich6 жыл бұрын

    Das Elektroboot XD

  • @Eastory

    @Eastory

    6 жыл бұрын

    I was somewhat uncertain if people would get the reference on this one :)

  • @bvthebalkananarchistmapper5642

    @bvthebalkananarchistmapper5642

    6 жыл бұрын

    +Eastory Which one of the remaining two episodes should I be expecting, the British, or the Soviet one?

  • @conveyor2

    @conveyor2

    5 жыл бұрын

    Creepy

  • @kaijukaru9010
    @kaijukaru90106 жыл бұрын

    So the allied scientists were in charge of alien autopsies after the invasion? 2:05

  • @vizkopo3384
    @vizkopo33846 жыл бұрын

    thank you for producing quality content like this.

  • @KyleLi
    @KyleLi6 жыл бұрын

    I freakin' love this channel. Period.

  • @krzywygeneral
    @krzywygeneral5 жыл бұрын

    Enigma was given by Poland after losing to Germany and USSR in 1939.

  • @iain3713

    @iain3713

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not the naval enigma

  • @mixererunio1757
    @mixererunio17576 жыл бұрын

    Enigma wasn't decrypted by British. It was decrypted by polish cryptoanalysts before war. Turing only upgraded their work when Germans upgraded their Enigmas.

  • @Arks200

    @Arks200

    6 жыл бұрын

    The british found a fully intact enigma machine on a submarine that a destroyer forced to surface. with that they were able to decrypt it

  • @kmg1100

    @kmg1100

    6 жыл бұрын

    The Polish didn't decipher enigma but made a very good and impressive start. They smuggled their work out of Poland when they were invaded so that Britain could use their work. They even managed to hide this fact from the Nazis, who as a result were impervous to attempts at cracking their secret codes.

  • @mixererunio1757

    @mixererunio1757

    6 жыл бұрын

    It isn't very hard to check it on wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptanalysis_of_the_Enigma

  • @Arks200

    @Arks200

    6 жыл бұрын

    mixererunio yes but in 1940 the Germans updated the enigma code and it was much harder to crack. The poles did start with it pretty well but the British got a major victory when they obtained a fully intact enigma machine from a U-Boat.

  • @Paciat

    @Paciat

    6 жыл бұрын

    Its not the enigma machine that was important. That could be made outside Germany en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_Enigma_double The code books were important. 1 time use codes from code books are unbreakable if you dont have that code book. Britain had to keep the capture of a code book a secret, cause Germans could just print different ones if they knew.

  • @32simas
    @32simas6 жыл бұрын

    This is really interesting and well animated. Subed without any further thought. keep it up.

  • @Cdgaming4U
    @Cdgaming4U6 жыл бұрын

    Great vid, can't wait for the next episode in the series

  • @kpmh2001
    @kpmh20016 жыл бұрын

    I'm disappointed nobody got the XCOM reference around 2:02

  • @aceous99

    @aceous99

    6 жыл бұрын

    nice 1 dood

  • @tobymaynard5221

    @tobymaynard5221

    5 жыл бұрын

    I loved that Xcom reference

  • @hint1k

    @hint1k

    5 жыл бұрын

    reverse engineering is not exactly an x-com invention.

  • @dominickstepper5302

    @dominickstepper5302

    5 жыл бұрын

    how was that an xcom reference?

  • @thehyperioncorporation8416

    @thehyperioncorporation8416

    5 жыл бұрын

    Zetos Stormrider the guy who is dissecting it is in an Xcom suit

  • @mustafahaithammohammedalha6194
    @mustafahaithammohammedalha61944 жыл бұрын

    this series is wonderful and I am eager to see the fourth section regarding british plans. Is there going to be a fourth episode in the series?

  • @Eastory

    @Eastory

    4 жыл бұрын

    Never say never, but at the moment I am focusing on making a series about the Western Front.

  • @mustafahaithammohammedalha6194

    @mustafahaithammohammedalha6194

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Eastory thanks for the response you deserve all support for your creativity!

  • @kolbasz3584
    @kolbasz35845 жыл бұрын

    Keep on uploading, great content : D

  • @RobinOnYew
    @RobinOnYew6 жыл бұрын

    this series is insane i am so glad i found this

  • @cornellius01
    @cornellius016 жыл бұрын

    Amazing to think that the Germans planned to overwhelm the Royal navy. The song "rule Britannia" had it's 200 yr birthday in 1940, should've been a clue.

  • @fernanF767

    @fernanF767

    6 жыл бұрын

    "Rule Britannia" was made for a war they lost badly.

  • @NoFlu

    @NoFlu

    6 жыл бұрын

    I mean you still got the German song "Der Deutsche U-Bootmann" (the German sub-marineman) which is basically a diss track aimed at Churchill, so there was atleast one good thing that came from this....

  • @mishkata348

    @mishkata348

    6 жыл бұрын

    You brits were lucky you had the USA on your side...

  • @GameFreak7744

    @GameFreak7744

    6 жыл бұрын

    Of course we were lucky to have the USA on our side. We'd probably have starved without the supply line, and would have had a hell of a time trying to make ground in France without the manpower. On the flip side, we're all also pretty lucky that Britain was dogged enough to hold off the Nazi war machine, because without Britain as a forward base for the US troops, and without the RAF for air cover the US would also have had *big* problems trying to make ground in France by themselves.

  • @Ben.....

    @Ben.....

    6 жыл бұрын

    The Germans never planned on "Overwhelming" the British navy. The video explained how the strategy was to literally starve Britain by destroying their merchant fleet. The video never even mentioned the German surface fleet.

  • @KingSlimjeezy
    @KingSlimjeezy5 жыл бұрын

    "a kingdom for some tea" lmfao

  • @CoriolanBataille
    @CoriolanBataille6 жыл бұрын

    Awesome content ! Can’t wait to watch the others 2 !

  • @MrDaanjanssen
    @MrDaanjanssen6 жыл бұрын

    Nice animation and a very enjoyable way of narrating, great video

  • @laughinsohard7888
    @laughinsohard78884 жыл бұрын

    Basically a constant "No u." contest.

  • @derived12
    @derived125 жыл бұрын

    This is a really amazing presentation! Thank you for contributing historical narratives that have been lacking in the present History Channel! Seems that channel has shifted to pointless shows like Ice Road Truckers -_- . Again, this is great! I look forward to seeing more videos!

  • @trycoldman2358
    @trycoldman23586 жыл бұрын

    This is a great video and I love the series!

  • @adamburjuva
    @adamburjuva6 жыл бұрын

    Dude these videos are wonderful. I subscribed and added this chanel to the adblock free list. Good job !

  • @sir_duckington1245
    @sir_duckington12454 жыл бұрын

    this whole war was: counter counter counter hey now we have a counter their just countering everything XD

  • @artvinnd5534
    @artvinnd55344 жыл бұрын

    I don't know why but I laugh so hard on : Nein!!! Where are you going?!

  • @chillout144
    @chillout1444 жыл бұрын

    Excellent video!!! I didnt know all that stuff!!! Well done mate

  • @janjankovicjahoda
    @janjankovicjahoda6 жыл бұрын

    Your vids are simple briliant and the animations are just awesome. :-)

  • @Nikolaj11
    @Nikolaj116 жыл бұрын

    It's scary how well war fuels technological innovation. The battles for the Atlantic are a prime example of this.

  • @erykstojek1101
    @erykstojek11015 жыл бұрын

    The polish man broke the enigna code

  • @b4nterontilt245

    @b4nterontilt245

    3 жыл бұрын

    3 guys

  • @erdy2558

    @erdy2558

    2 жыл бұрын

    Pierdole it was alan during

  • @Philip54622

    @Philip54622

    2 жыл бұрын

    Alan Turing wasnt polish

  • @pex_the_unalivedrunk6785
    @pex_the_unalivedrunk67856 жыл бұрын

    That was a pretty in depth (charge) lesson in ww2 submarine warfare! (Pardon the pun) Nice video!

  • @imborahey7568
    @imborahey75686 жыл бұрын

    Loving your videos, keep it up! Hope that youll get more views

  • @itsrockyiv8209
    @itsrockyiv82093 жыл бұрын

    Germany: Invents acoustic torpedo. Britain: **Plays boom boom pow behind the ship**

  • @Fif0l
    @Fif0l5 жыл бұрын

    Enigma! Polish guys broke the Enigma for the British. Just saying. WW2 was fascinating. As for U-Boots, I didn't realize how much of an issue resurfacing was. It's always stated in history books, but never explained.

  • @ahriman935

    @ahriman935

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, they don't teach us anything like that in school. Instead a whole horseload of unimportant dates. Basically submarines at the time were really more of a "small warship capable of operating underwater" rather than full fledged submarine as we know them today. They had to operate mostly on the surface and submerge only if in danger, sacrificing over 50% of their speed while doing so. Furthermore, the U-boot captains actually preferred to perform torpedo attacks while surfaced, under cover of night, in groups (famous wolfpacks).

  • @rosscof3660
    @rosscof36606 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic video. Very well done!

  • @TheMinocula
    @TheMinocula4 жыл бұрын

    thank you for this great review and illustrations! keep going you are one of my favorite channels! kind regards from switzerland (where we really neutral?) ;-)

  • @adamanderson3042
    @adamanderson30425 жыл бұрын

    0:56 "And the British lacked destroyers which could fill that role" How? The Royal Navy had more destroyers than anyone in the world. What COULD be the case and what you would be more accurate in saying is that perhaps the Home Fleet lacked destroyers and/or the British were spread out across the entire globe to the point that the amount of destroyers they could dedicate to fighting the U-Boats would be inadequate. But that's a very different picture than painting a picture where the Royal navy didn't have more destroyers than anyone in the war, which is the reality.

  • @Eastory

    @Eastory

    5 жыл бұрын

    I basically agree with everything what you say. If I remember correctly, then what I meant, was that they didn't have enough destroyers for both combat and merchant escort duties. I didn't mean that the problem was that the Royal Navy was small, but that the task put on it was very big.

  • @adamanderson3042

    @adamanderson3042

    5 жыл бұрын

    @@Eastory Thumbs up!

  • @nicocurti3478

    @nicocurti3478

    3 жыл бұрын

    I know this is years old, but you can have the biggest Navy in the world and still lack destroyers, but that might be too much thinking for nationalist assholes

  • @youraveragescotsman7119

    @youraveragescotsman7119

    3 жыл бұрын

    We had over 400 Destroyers by the end of WWI, but naval treaties and budget cuts forced us to downgrade to just over 110. Imagine if the UK still had that number of Destroyers.

  • @Vajperrr
    @Vajperrr4 жыл бұрын

    4:05 how many times do I have to repeat? Poles broke the enigma code.

  • @b4nterontilt245

    @b4nterontilt245

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@Michael_png 3 Polish guys broke the enigma first then they pass their research on Brits who finished it

  • @KemRod
    @KemRod6 жыл бұрын

    This is such a good series please finish it!

  • @alkalinelemons9239
    @alkalinelemons92394 жыл бұрын

    Very epic videos you make, keep up the good work!

  • @ZinfinityX
    @ZinfinityX5 жыл бұрын

    """Snorkle""" was adopted

  • @zethicalyt2406
    @zethicalyt24065 жыл бұрын

    2:03 (XCOM) Commander! we Have A New “Autopsy” Its Called The “Magnetic Mine Autopsy”

  • @bificommander7472

    @bificommander7472

    4 жыл бұрын

    "Commander, I would caution against using explosives." "... they ARE explosives!"

  • @sirierieott5882
    @sirierieott58825 жыл бұрын

    Found your channel via WWII, Indy & Co. Like you style. Subbed today!

  • @Eastory

    @Eastory

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for the sub!

  • @VytenisGavelis
    @VytenisGavelis4 жыл бұрын

    Thanks, I've really learned a lot from this video!

  • @kymer6696
    @kymer66964 жыл бұрын

    Hitler from 1939: *travels on a time machine* *Watches this video* Hitler: interesting

  • @jangelbrich7056
    @jangelbrich70566 жыл бұрын

    War technology is of course important to win a war; and Your summary is excellent. Resources of any kind are also important, and many documentaries are there about just that ... but You need something immaterial to win a war, but that is not "heroism" which German were best at in their propaganda ... they would have needed a just sake, and that they were lacking completely. Longing for hegemony (of any kind) AKA power is not sufficient, and has never been sufficient for any great power. In WWII, Germany completely failed (and never intended) to give the occupied zones anything good, instead there was purest exploitation and rape, especially on the Eastern front. Any empire based on violent power only will fall. Sooner or later. And so, the fall of the Nazi Reich was just a matter of time.

  • @TheGlenofKrokot

    @TheGlenofKrokot

    6 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, that's true I think if they was more like a "good guys, liberators also" they could've gathered more support in socialist republics or any other occupied lands so there could've been less sabotage and all that shit Buuut they've done what they've done. Dunno if it's "good" or "not".. :s

  • @jordandickinson5996
    @jordandickinson59966 жыл бұрын

    please keeping making these

  • @theinnerparty5295
    @theinnerparty52953 жыл бұрын

    Love your channel mate.

  • @davarus
    @davarus5 жыл бұрын

    "Schnorchel" xD

  • @blueartvix4353
    @blueartvix43534 жыл бұрын

    " *Blockade* " me in hoi4: *sends paratroopers and makes uk surrender*

  • @jordiedmond5744
    @jordiedmond57444 жыл бұрын

    You have done great research well done

  • @miniaturesandstuff5209
    @miniaturesandstuff52096 жыл бұрын

    Amazing and well done video!!!

  • @aniksamiurrahman6365
    @aniksamiurrahman63655 жыл бұрын

    Germany: I have a cunning plan. British Emp: As cunning as a fox, who's just appointed professor of cunning?

  • @hansgruber788

    @hansgruber788

    4 жыл бұрын

    at Oxford University*

  • @aaronpaul9188
    @aaronpaul91885 жыл бұрын

    To win the battle of the atlantic, the germans had to sink allied shipping. The allies only had to prevent that shipping from being lost. The allies could use air power to force the submarines to travel submerged, where they were too slow to get into position against convoys. Escort carriers were the real game changer as they extended air cover for the entire length of the trip. A submarine that could travel as fast as a merchant ship while submerged would have been enormously helpful, but was never developed.

  • @stealthyshadow567

    @stealthyshadow567

    4 жыл бұрын

    The axis powers had one job in WW2: don’t get the Soviets or the Americans involved. Thanks Japan

  • @onewhosaysgoose4831
    @onewhosaysgoose48314 жыл бұрын

    That ships-sunk graphic is pretty impressive, and helps quickly communicate the trends in submarine and anti-submarine operations.

  • @richardbecker697
    @richardbecker6976 жыл бұрын

    Good content! Keep it up!

  • @FredricF
    @FredricF6 жыл бұрын

    The British broke the enigma code, that's true, but they did not need an enigma machine to do it. In fact the whole point of the enigma machine was that the code was supposed to unbreakable, even if you knew the details of the machine. You should need the code books. Fortunately for the Brits, and unfortunately for the Germans, there where a few flaws in the enigma machine and the way it was operated that made it possible to break the code and that the Brits did. I highly recommend a visit to the Bletchley Park museum and The Code Book by Simon Singh to learn about this stellar achievement and other related stuff.

  • @blugaledoh2669

    @blugaledoh2669

    6 жыл бұрын

    FredricF interesting.

  • @wrednydziadzio687

    @wrednydziadzio687

    5 жыл бұрын

    if you were at the Bletchley Park Museum - why did not you see photographs of 3 Polish mathematicians who broke the enigma in 1934? .... as well as devices (including copies of enigma) donated to the British by Polish intelligence in 1939? all this is in the museum and the English are talking about it honestly

  • @Xick
    @Xick4 жыл бұрын

    This is kind of how it went for German tech in general: 1. Do a really unusual, really specific thing really, really well, 2. completely roll over the Allies with it for about a year, 3. Allies figure out some kind of spam that counters it for pennies.

  • @patrickholt2270

    @patrickholt2270

    4 жыл бұрын

    Germans couldn't do spam where it mattered, because of lack of oil. They never really needed more tanks, planes, trucks or subs than they built, because they couldn't keep the ones they had moving. Building more okay but reliable tanks and planes like the allies did (BREN Gun carrier: rubbish but works, make tens of thousands) would have been pointless, they would have rotted in the factory carparks. So trying to beat quantity with quality was their only option.

  • @viktordunaew5119
    @viktordunaew51196 жыл бұрын

    Please more videos. Its too interesting to watch them :))

  • @paliga9837
    @paliga98376 жыл бұрын

    cant wait for part 3 and 4!!!

  • @piotrwojcik6277
    @piotrwojcik62775 жыл бұрын

    its polish who decrypted enigma not british

  • @gewoonferroni2865
    @gewoonferroni28654 жыл бұрын

    the dutch plan: be neutral ok t hat didn't work plan b: fight them with your 100 year old army with cannons older then the generals controling the army and not get one of your cities carpetbombed well thats a fail lets just surrender guys this happend in 2 days

  • @speaklikeanative
    @speaklikeanative6 жыл бұрын

    I love these, please make more

  • @cantor0305
    @cantor03055 жыл бұрын

    i learn many new infos in 10min despite hours and hours of reading ww2. bravo

  • @Eastory

    @Eastory

    5 жыл бұрын

    Nice to heart that!

  • @tomfurstyfield
    @tomfurstyfield5 жыл бұрын

    Has no one mentioned SUBscribe at the end?!

  • @TheGamerASD
    @TheGamerASD5 жыл бұрын

    Mein fruher, there is a problem. I spelled führer wrong in the video.

  • @rascallyrabbit717

    @rascallyrabbit717

    4 жыл бұрын

    He can spell it mein fuckers for all we care

  • @rascallyrabbit717

    @rascallyrabbit717

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Abu Dabu every GodDamn day

  • @patrickpaganini
    @patrickpaganini2 жыл бұрын

    Awesome vid - thanks!

  • @drumshero03
    @drumshero036 жыл бұрын

    Please make more of these videos! They are awesome! The French one was amazing!

  • @drunkenleaf7854
    @drunkenleaf78545 жыл бұрын

    For anyone wondering, the Enigma was cracked by a bunch of code breakers in Bletchley Park, one man named Alan Turing is credited for heading the team and was treated horribly by his country after the war, ending his own life in 54'

  • @ryanpayne9119
    @ryanpayne91194 жыл бұрын

    A little known piece of history is what some civilians did in the U.S. after Germany declared war on us. A bunch of civilian pilots got together and started strapping bombs, depth charges, and/or guns to private aircraft and started attacking German U-boats. and by "strapped on," I mean held on by a piece of bungee cord that was cut to drop the bomb. This was the beginning of the Civil Air Patrol, which is credited with two confirmed kills in addition to several hundred merchant marine lives saved. Wilkommen zu Amerika, mutherf-kas.

  • @bobsagget823

    @bobsagget823

    4 жыл бұрын

    Completely WRONG. Imagine spewing completely incorrect propaganda. After the fall of the Third Reich, the records of the Kriegsmarine, notably those of the U-boat arm, were captured by the Allied forces. Analyzed in conjunction with the Ultra intercepts (decrypted German radio traffic), the Joint Army-Navy Assessment Committee was able to account for the fate of all of Germany’s 1,154 U-boats. Of the fourteen submarines confirmed sunk off the American Eastern and Gulf seaboards from March 1942 to August 1943, none were confirmed sunk by the CAP; indeed the committee did not assign CAP credit for any U-boats. The claim by CAP of damaging or destroying enemy submarines appears to originate from within CAP’s own national headquarters based on reports from the organization’s coastal patrol task forces. The U.S. military did not formally credit the CAP with the destruction or damage of two enemy submarines, either during or after the conclusion of World War II. The CAP damage or destruction claims are now known to be without factual evidence.

  • @blooddeath29
    @blooddeath296 жыл бұрын

    Very good video, please continue the series.

  • @blooddeath29

    @blooddeath29

    6 жыл бұрын

    Also your Estonian War of Independence animated was done brilliantly, please give us more

  • @SLAPPEDbyAhat
    @SLAPPEDbyAhat6 жыл бұрын

    This channel is great.