Some of the comments by people who show no understanding of the issue, but exceptional command of the caps lock key, just hurts my heart and make me despair for the human future

Debate? What a joke! All these people think the same thing. This shows that they are afraid of true debate, and Cox either lies about his 'uncontroversial' ideas and that all major political parties swallow his groupthink (UKIP don't) or never leaves his BBC bubble. A better title would've been "Climate Alarmist Circle jerk, with Brian Cox".

I gave this a thumbs up but I do not agree on the assertion that climate change is not an immediate problem and we got time to deal with it. Also, they were claiming (I don't think all) that this really won't hurt people any time soon. Those are dangerous and sad positions to be taking but I think it will be a nicer world the longer we live in denial. Once we realize the oncoming onslaught... things will change.

Why don't those convinced that climate change isn't going to have the effects predicted set up an insurance company, undercut the competition and make a fortune?

@Walsh2571

7 жыл бұрын

Nobody makes high risk investments in climate change impacts. Not when every model overestimates the effects.

@NapoleonGelignite

4 жыл бұрын

@@Walsh2571 - easy money. Just take a bet that next year won't be among the top ten hottest years ever - Thunderfoot has bet a kilo of gold. None of denialists are brave enough to take the bet though.....

Not enough agreement in the population. We need more education and more involvement. Thanks,very well spoken!

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

It's a scam. You were just educated.

@pauldurand4780

8 ай бұрын

These are the same kinda people back in the 70s saying we're heading into a catastrophic new ice age... and since China became an industrial manufacturing energy burning giant in the 90s the temperature has not risen significantly in the 2000s. They must be inhaling all the CO2 they produce.. And this year, and next, will be extreme because of a double el niño, just as the last few years were because of an extended else niña...But you won't hear that from the globalist media trying to get you to use less oil/electricity and water with dribble shower heads to save the planet while they build six man- and not a few children- sized water fall walk in showers for themselves in their private jets...

@donniebaker5984

7 ай бұрын

@@ricktd6891 would it be good to know that pulling all co2 from the air will kill our only source for oxygen and food or is that too insignificant to mean anything to anyone ????

@ricktd6891

7 ай бұрын

@@donniebaker5984 We don't need to take all of it out of the air to kill all life on Earth, just bring it down to 150 PPM and everyone dies.

@ricktd6891

7 ай бұрын

@@donniebaker5984 And yea, kind of important fact.

Why there were no Climate Scientists in a panel about Climate Change? A matematician, an ecologist, an astrophysicist and a writer? WHY?

@TheMobileHomestead

5 жыл бұрын

You don't need to have Climate Scientists on that Panel because Climate Scientists have already PROVEN that Global Warming /Climate Change is Real and Happening ... you have a biologist here who is doing her job of showing how bio-diversity is effected by climate change ...you have a famous physicist explaining how mathematics prove Global Warming /Climate Change is Real and Happening ...he also knows that his field has shown that the isotopic signature of carbon burned by mankind is the main driver of Global Warming /Climate Change ...how do they know that because you can measure it....

@davidmiriamnatashada

4 жыл бұрын

Boy Mr Homstead, you have missed the mark by a mile. They have not proven it, the physicist you speak of has not been able to prove it was caused by man, only that the CO2 he tracked is mostly man made. Learn the science don’t trust half truths .. omission of facts sways the impression learn all the facts then speak again

@TheMobileHomestead

4 жыл бұрын

@@davidmiriamnatashada here you go dipshit.. www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2004/12/how-do-we-know-that-recent-cosub2sub-increases-are-due-to-human-activities-updated/

@TheMobileHomestead

4 жыл бұрын

@@davidmiriamnatashada Also dipshit ...my post was not referring to only this physicist

@voteutah

Жыл бұрын

​​@@davidmiriamnatashada Brian disappoints me here. Watch Paul Beckwith, Guy McPherson, and dozens of others. We're headed down and the solutions we may have had in the middle of the last century are no longer. I call this the Endocene, but still wish to be wrong.

Climate change deniers have already downvoted the video...

Why isn't every new home being built furnished with solar roofs? Also, owners of electricity pylons could have double-helix wind turbines attached to them. The power harnessed would be slight individually but given the pylons already accommodate a ground space/area I feel the pylons as a whole would harness huge amounts of energy. Jobs would be created. It would be clean, it's already plumbed in to the current infrastructure... What's not to like or forge ahead with? I'd patent the idea but I think it's an idea that should be open for anyone to utilise.

Brian Cox - Please respond to Piers Corbyn's challenge / request for debate. You know what I am talking about.

@Alan62651

5 жыл бұрын

That is a debate I want to watch. Get to the meat of the subject, and leave the pseudosciences (Ecological Studies) and virtual realities (mathematical modeling) behind. Demonstrate with real physics how weather is generated.

@judyives1832

3 жыл бұрын

Debating that conspiracy nut bar would be ridiculous. He has no basis for his crazy claims. To debate him would only give him a platform for his non science nonsense rhetorics.

31:30

The question was asked "can we see the effects of climate change?" I recall the south of UK used to have definite snowfall each winter, it just depended when. Now we barely need thick coats each year.

@my_carp_life3424

2 жыл бұрын

Wonder what the wooly mamouth thought 🤔 when the ice started to melt in the northern hemisphere, probably blaming it on the cave man building a 🔥 in his cave.

So Brian, what was your Climate Change Views?

I live in North Carolina, USA. I moved here in 92. Not only have I noticed the change in weather, but we now have several new species that were once only found in Florida or Texas. The American Cockroach/Palmetto bug showed up around 2010, and are now everywhere. Stink bug swarms in spring started in 2017. American Alligator is now a common sight as of about 2019. Armadillo have began showing up in the last year. The new warnings for 2021 are of the migration of invasive snake species from the Everglades in Southern Florida. Species native to Asia, Africa, and South America. Are now right at home in the Mid-Atlantic states of North America... The fascists have withheld technology that would have ended our dependence on fossil fuels bc it would mean the elite lose their monopolies. They have poisoned us, the planet, all life on earth, for temporary personal monetary gain. For worthless paper. Imaginary 1s and 0s. Maybe the ET will save the planet before we destroy it completely

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

It's a scam.

@hg6996

9 ай бұрын

​@@ricktd6891 You are an example of the US educational failure

@ricktd6891

8 ай бұрын

@@hg6996 Clearly you're not paying attention, the commie schools are the ones abusing the children with these end of the world les. if you care about children being abused, you should get the truth.

@ricktd6891

8 ай бұрын

@@hg6996 How's your climate science knowledge? What deadly level of atmospheric CO2 are we closer to, the high deadly level or the low deadly level?

@hg6996

8 ай бұрын

@@ricktd6891 This is an irrelevant question. Lowering the amount from the preindustrial level would have brought us an ice age. This would be as bad as the currently warming planet. Humans have adopted to today's climate and every change is a challenge especially when it's going as fast as today.

Superb discussion, the question and answers were comprehensive so was the general consensus amongst panel of scientist that climate change is something we must take seriously.

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

No, it's a scam.

@simontunnicliffe2107

11 ай бұрын

​@@ricktd6891Thank god you were here to completely solve the climate change dilemma. Phew!

@ricktd6891

11 ай бұрын

@@simontunnicliffe2107 You could try asking questions instead of trying to be a smart ass.

@pauldurand4780

8 ай бұрын

Well..if we can harness the sun's outburst and the earth orbit then maybe wearing masks might be the answer... ps. Last time l did science class l was taught plants LOVE CO2...

@paulhogg2945

5 ай бұрын

@@simontunnicliffe2107 The man made climate change nonsense is just another rich mans trick Co2 is only 0.04% and if it drops below 0.02% plant life starts to die off.

Ok so light travels at different speeds through different mediums - so if we remove those mediums would light either do nothing or travel faster / instant?

@jimcook8933

4 жыл бұрын

If I have a car that travels at the speed of light and I turn the headlights on, does anything happen?

@ASDeckard

4 жыл бұрын

@@jimcook8933 The speed of light is always relative to the observer, and you are always traveling at zero velocity relative to yourself. This means you will measure the speed of any light emitted from a thing traveling with you as traveling away from you at exactly the speed of light.

This is interesting and the more data we collect the more we know about the earth it would nice to find out more how the rotation of the earth and the movements of the plates effect the heating of the earth, I am only a builder but I have a questioning mind. I think will will find out more as the time go's by I would love to know if the speed that planets spin at affects the temperature

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

It's all lies, the climate is fine.

@matty7758

10 ай бұрын

​@@ricktd6891oh thanks Rick i feel so much better now...

@ricktd6891

9 ай бұрын

@@matty7758 I'm glad you sarcastically feel better now but you should be asking me why. I'll be happy to tell you. CO2 doesn't control the temperature of Earth. CO2 isn't historically high, it's historically low. The Earth isn't historically hot, it's historically cold and the climate is not changing faster than it ever did before. It's all lies. Here's some proof. Search : "Global temperature and atmospheric CO2 over geologic time/graph/images." Also see "The Younger Dryas Event" to see global warming/climate change happening 10 times faster than it has over the last 200 years.

@pauldurand4780

8 ай бұрын

Uh..yeah...maybe just stick to building...But that makes me wonder if you should do that anymore...maybe try something where lives and 10s of thousands of dollars are not at stake...

@daaronk

7 ай бұрын

@@ricktd6891 why bother with science when there´s a random guy that settles the issue in 1/10th of a millisecond... :/

...(10:00),,... Holy Cow,,, Thats a crazy looking Cat !..lol..

@wildanS

5 жыл бұрын

Weirdest facial hair I've ever seen. What a delusional guy. I wonder if he really think that mess on his face looks good, intellectual or whatever positive trait he wants to convey.

you have to KNOW HOW WE KNOW WHAT WE KNOW. if you don't know how we know what we know, it's easy to think it's baseless, because you don't know the base. a lot if people are just WAY BEHIND in terms of knowing how we know anything.

@antiprismatic

6 жыл бұрын

Banter Space hahahahahahahaha yeah....

@PerJustert

6 жыл бұрын

Hehehe I know I know I know I wan¨t ....

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

I know it's a scam.

@matty7758

10 ай бұрын

You can't give a scientific explanation to someone who a.) doesn't understand the scientific process and b.) is willfully ignorant

Another great talk to listen to is this one with Paul Watson of the Sea Shepherd Society (Paul Watson talks Climate - KZread). Such a keen understanding of how important the oceans are to our and all life on the planet's survival.

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

Commies pushing a global scam.

@pauldurand4780

8 ай бұрын

The ocean land and sky are ALL important. And he quit Greenpeace when the left-handed lesbian albino midgets alternative lifestylers Infiltrated the org and made mankind, and particularly men, the object of their self righteous crusade..

Why are these things turned on 1/2 an hour before the event starts? Then not rectified? Too much science involved in that ?

Amaizing but why can't it so difficult to understand for many people

@johnsamson9680

2 жыл бұрын

It’s not, there is a lot of money pumped into disinformation and propaganda by the fossil fuel industry, their bought politicians and members of the public who don’t care about the issues only that their “team” wins.

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

It's a scam. The Earth is historically cold right now, not historically hot.

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

@@johnsamson9680 It's a scam dude, CO2 doesn't control the temperature of Earth. That's really all you need to know to debunk the hypothesis.

@tdevry

9 ай бұрын

​@@ricktd6891When the guy started with his steam train comparison I thought....bollocks. When the other guy started with his 130ppm million years story I thought, even bigger bollocks especially as we know that at 130ppm most lifeforms will struggle to survive. What puzzles me is that this lot can tell all these "facts" with so much enthusiasm and be so mislead. You are right, it is a scam. One can only get a grant if you want to convince people that they are evil and are causing climate change. As we all should know, climate is erratic, unpredictable and never consistent. But lo and behold, man can now control climate with......CO2......the stupidity of it all is mind-boggling. No wonder we have net zero and stop oil mentally scarred people running amok nowadays.

@jastrees

7 ай бұрын

@@ricktd6891 have you actually watched the video? at 15:30 a leader professor in climate science literally explains how CO2 absorbs heat.... therefore; more CO2 = more heat

I really love the scientific mind and way of thinking. How wonderful it would be if we could bypass all the middle men a.k.a politicians and morons and just go about things as it should be done and not by someones personal whims like corporations etc.

@MatteNoob

7 жыл бұрын

You don't think science is politicized and controlled by monetary incentives? Science is broken, totally broken.

@vikitheviki

7 жыл бұрын

Nonsense, then it's not science but monetized broken fake 'science' controlled by corporations.

@MatteNoob

7 жыл бұрын

kaxitaksi Yep, like global warming turning climate change. A gravy train.

@vikitheviki

7 жыл бұрын

You are kidding, right? This is why I like the mind of scientists and not the mind of morons.

@TheDragogiovanni

7 жыл бұрын

kaxitaksi You are confused because these people are "scientists" FUNDED AND CONTROLLED BY THE "middle men" morons. You are missing the philosophical principle of true science and data.

How can we limit warming to 2 degrees? We have another 40 years of co2 effects to encounter, if we stopped tomorrow, but we will continue to burn for many years yet. Youd have to be very political to think theres hope of 2 degrees, its frustrating to see they are being so conservative, and what appears to be very unrealistic.

This is not a debate though. For it to be a convincing debate, you need some of the prominent scientists with contrary views to have their bit, right? One can hardly call oneself objective if one will only present the portion of agreement. I believe it's often referred to as an "echo chamber", right? It's certainly not the case that it is hard to find credible professors in directly relevant fields with compelling, peer reviewed and convincing science to contradict very fundamental portions of what is assumed to be rudimentary in this, well, not debate but let's say, friendly chat and expression of agreement on one side of the argument. Just off the top of my head: There is professor Judy Curry, head of the climate science department at Georgia Tech. Professor Bob Carter. Professor William Happer of Princeton University. Professor John Christy. Professor Fred Goldberg. Dr. Richard Keen. Professor Matt Ridley. Dr. Jennifer Marohasy. Dr. Roy Spencer... who actually ran the NASA team collecting the satellite IR temperature data during the Clinton and part of the Bush administrations. Dr. Moore... Ecoscientist and co-founder of Greenpeace. Professor Richard Lindzen, senior climate science professor at MIT. Oh, there are many. Certainly not a majority or anything of the kind, but throw a rock in a bush and you hit three.

@MrRob1967

7 жыл бұрын

Who cares we've won anyway. Even the alarmists agree that Paris is meaningless even if everyone did adhere to it. (Not that any climate agreement from Kyoto on has ever gone anywhere.) Just let them talk and take symbolic action; it's all they want anyway. Like Michael Crichton said: "all you have to do is buy a Prius, drive it to an award ceremony and give it to the maid after a couple of months and you're done." Same with these people. All you have to do is agree: you don't actually have to do anything meaningful.

Questions, I understand that we can be exposed safely to low doses of radiation. We all know huge nuclear plants are very dangerous. So why can't we build tiny reactors and bury them near our homes for energy? Tiny meaning like the size of an average household washing machine or smaller ? Wouldn't small reactors be a safer,easier, way to handle this energy source?

@XPrezObamaX

Жыл бұрын

I mean the first thing that comes to mind is that, they will still be dangerous if the user dosnt know what they are doing... giving something like that to everyone would be horrible. The average person is to stupid to handle something like that in their everyday life... also the engineering needed to develop something like that...

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

It's a scam, the climate is fine. Use cheap oil when we get it back.

I presume Co2 absorbs solar energy as soon as it's released. So my question is this. From about 1997 to 2017 humans produced more Co2 during this period than in all of human history combined. But over the same 20yr period the world didn't warm up. Why?

@NapoleonGelignite

4 жыл бұрын

It did warm up.

@garyha2650

4 жыл бұрын

0.85 degrees C since 1880

@my_carp_life3424

2 жыл бұрын

Spot on

skip to 2:37 if you don't want the sales pitch

Dr Robert Holmes has formulated this equation T = P/(R.d/n) T temperature K P surface pressure R gas constant d density n mean moles. It seems to work on planets that have an atmosphere > 10 kPa to accurately determine their surface temperature regardless of the atmosphere's composition. If planetary surface temperature can be determine by pressure density and mean moles what does this say to the IPCC claim that temperature will raise by up 5 deg C with a doubling of CO2.

it's amazing how dilettantes will assume that they have found huge holes in the arguments of scientists, and that they know better than the consensus of the peer-reviewed scientific community. amazing ego and hubris!

Well we are currently getting a few tons of Methane from Fracking all over the uk and usa. Methane is of course 86% worse than CO2.

So many smart and articulate people addressing the wrong topics for the right reasons. It will become hotter and wetter (mostly) for a while. We must adapt to that reality, not pretend we can reverse it. Historically, we have proven very good at adapting and very poor at mitigative planning and implementation - lets go with what we are good at.

@TDashem

4 ай бұрын

Why couldn’t we adapt by reducing CO2 output?

@marcct24

4 ай бұрын

@@TDashem I think we are - dont you? a better question might be - do we actually need to? This topic is of significance. But is it more important than feeding everyone or removing plastic waste from our Oceans? I ask because as soon as we try to galavant the masses - we lose focus and fail. And I would argue that there are at least 2 topics (I think the UN agrees if you chack) more important

@TDashem

4 ай бұрын

@@marcct24 Yes, I do believe efforts have been underway to reduce CO2 emissions. I believe the reason is because, after reviewing the data from experimentation and study, experts in the field have determined it necessary. I bring this up because there seems to be pushback against these measures mostly from laypersons without credentials or accomplishments one might expect in order to speak with authority on such matters. I admittedly am no expert on climate and have not reviewed enough data to claim authoritative knowledge on the facts, however I have read over the reasoning of the majority of scientists on the effect of Co2 gas buildup causing increased global warming as well as correlation of CO2 spike with human industrialization. I also don’t believe the stance of authorities is that we can reverse the effect, but the aim is to stop the spike prior to reaching catastrophic levels. So the reasonable answer to your question would seem to be yes. We do need to reduce Co2 output, unless there is some other evidence based understanding that continuing along the path of excessive CO2 production will not produce catastrophic heat conditions in regards to human habitation on earth in the foreseeable future.

Problems,troubles, climate change, disease out break, shortage of food, increased conditioner in the air.....etc. are good for the species evolution because that is/was the basis for the evolution theory. Right? Thanks.

@kimweaver3323

7 жыл бұрын

Evolution isn't a "desired outcome". It's a result of stresses on populations of species.

@AsratMengesha

7 жыл бұрын

+ kim weaver i thought that stress was a killer. Are you discussing a myths (evolution) as science?

It's amazing that there was room for all those people with Cox's massive ego in there. No warming for 20 years...so much for the failed CO2 hypothesis.

Reference Timestamp 13 minutes: So a 1 million year ice core record somehow represents the entire history of planetary climate change? Why not show the ENTIRE history of atmospheric CO2 and the corresponding global temperatures going back say 3.5 billion years? Dinosaurs were around 65 million years ago, the Cambrian Explosion 540 million years ago. One million years ago is NOT a long time in planetary time scales. Lets for example use a relatively small timeframe of 540 million years. From a statistical sampling perspective if you had a room full of 540 people would you think picking one person who happens to be standing in the front row and then present their characteristics as being representative of all 540 people to be a sensible proposal? IMO this looks like an unethical and unbalanced presentation of "pop science" by a panel of four who are all in violent agreement with each other. Data is cherry picked to suit and promote an already determined dogma of anthropogenic climate change as being "irrefutable". There are tens of thousands of scientists who think it is refutable. Most people in the room will be blinded by the big number of a million years and think this is sufficient time based on their inability to compare their relatively short life spans with 1 million years. The most recent one million years pales into insignificance versus the 3.5 billion years of fossil records (i.e. this discussion is therefore pivoted on a data sample of 1 out of a population of 3,500).

I can't help thinking that one of the panel looks like Jeremy Corbin.

The truth is a small group like this can not possibly know enough to determine anything useful about Earth's climate. You would need a team of Hundreds of Scientists from Hundreds of different fields, each being open minded and dedicated to a life time of study and research to even come close to understanding and making accurate predication about Climate Change. Simply saying your a Climatologist and blaming so called greenhouse gas emissions is like saying your a Automotive engineer because you can put air in your tyres and petrol in the tank.

@Makrel94

4 жыл бұрын

Linz Earth. So.. By your own logic, all of what you wrote is nonsense.

Climb aboard the IPCC gravy train. Take a look to the left, take a look to the right. You will see the bad science that is all around.

This is a good example of bad science.

@rory7590

5 жыл бұрын

This is a good example of a non-argument.

royal society is a charity? what does that mean?

So you want the south pole to turn into a tourist centre? Planes, trains and automobiles roaming the poles? That in spite of the fact that the south pole is not a very hospitable world. But we talk about it again in 50 years and maybe you will have sunny beaches in Antarctica ;-)

He can't possibly think those sideburns are a good look lmao

@nylehaywood2471

3 жыл бұрын

Ya

@Caluma122

3 жыл бұрын

It's an interesting one for sure!

@AUTUMN-DARK

3 жыл бұрын

He wanted to he wanted to accentuate his otherwise subtle eyebrows

In the past, there have been much more rapid changes in climate than what is observed today. Species are forever adapting to changes in their environments. For example, 6,000-7,000 years ago, polar bears, walruses and penguins had far less snow and ice in their environment than today.

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

Yup, it's a scam.

Hi Why are we not allowed to travel to the South Pole?

@AsratMengesha

7 жыл бұрын

Good question: also why is that there is no visit trip provider company that provides transpiration and accommodation to tourists visiting south pole?

@kimweaver3323

7 жыл бұрын

No market? Plus Antarctica is covered by a special UN convention which would make tourism difficult, at best.

@VORZERO

7 жыл бұрын

Its a civilian no go zone, yet theres many bases there of different nations with military/scientific interest. The Nazis were the first I believe to go there, after the war the others went to see what they were doing there. Very interesting.

@dennistedder3384

7 жыл бұрын

It's easy. I've been twice. You're not going to book it online through Kayak.

@devanvelo3725

7 жыл бұрын

+Dennis Tedder yeah? How did you book, tell us more

Ok since I am hungry this is easier to watch than the other video. Don't watch videos about food when you are hungry.

Unfortunally the carbon cycle is about 30 years not 300 years en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating_considerations#/media/File:Radiocarbon_bomb_spike.svg

There is no Greenhouse Effect. Crack open a Physics textbook. it's pretty obvious the Hypothisis is totally flawed.

You can fret about Climate Change if you want, as long as no money leaves my pocket.

@Artman1

6 жыл бұрын

Do you get your crude oil from Islam and ISIS for free?

@alienscientist8893

4 жыл бұрын

At leastb25% of your electric bill is paying for this scam. .

@NapoleonGelignite

4 жыл бұрын

@@alienscientist8893 - how much of the rest of the electricity bill goes on gas and coal?

@alienscientist8893

4 жыл бұрын

@@NapoleonGelignite 25% Subsidise the shit windmills everywhere in the UK they run at a Los so you pay for that lost,, the 75% left of your bill pays oil and coal as well as tax. So without wind power our electric bills would be 25% less..

Maybe these folks could run a study on the effects of the unmarked planes that are running around with reckless abandon spraying whatever it is they are spraying on us and see if in fact they are not part of the problem!!

@judyives1832

3 жыл бұрын

If you really believe that it would be good to go get some mental health treatment. Rampant paranoia is not a good thing.

Rather see Brian alone. Too many cooks. But I'm a bit biased. I like hard science minus the pleasantries.

@nyali2

7 ай бұрын

He used to be reasonable, now he is an activist.. sadly

How many new species of life are being created by the increased climate change?

@johnbryan459

3 жыл бұрын

Bill Matthews life Will adapt but humans can not evolve that fast. We are only worried about ourselves.

@hexagon9895

3 жыл бұрын

@@johnbryan459 we will have to wear fire suits lol

Would any of you like me to show you how to make a dinosaur, when it gets hot enough?

And now 2021 nothing have happen, and remains is just talks, talks...

Could have had some actual climate scientists that have an alternative view. Peirs Corbyn has been asking for a debate on climate change for years.

@NapoleonGelignite

4 жыл бұрын

Piers Corbyn?? He is not a climate scientist of any kind.

@iancampbell6925

4 жыл бұрын

@@NapoleonGeligniteNeither is Brian Cox

@grippipethin2796

4 жыл бұрын

Andy P Piers Corbyn knows far more than Brian Cox will ever know about the climate.

Would have been more interested if the counter argument was also represented on the panel. I admit i am a layman and do not know what the truth is, but it appears that the climate change proponents do not like to be challenged.

I hope Brian Cox, Bill Nye Lawerence Krauss and others can all put their "man pants" on if/when they ever figure it out unless they already have and are just cashing in. I cant imagine that there in the dark on this one but I do hope they are !

@BusterDuglas

9 ай бұрын

Dumbfuckery + Illiteracy = not knowing the difference between Their, There, & They're..."I cant imagine that there in the dark "

And to answer the question on the boost for evolution by climate change. Yes evolution follows climate change but today the climate is simply going way to fast, species will not be able to adapt and will go instinct

@alienscientist8893

4 жыл бұрын

Total nonesence..

Humans depend on plants and insects to survive. If they can't adapt quickly enough there goes our food supply. Also, if we stopped depositing CO2 into our atmosphere there would be fewer particles in the air to create the umbrella effect (global dimming) that currently shields the earth from some of the sun's energy, resulting in an even faster pace of global warming as the "umbrella" dissipates. What we need to do is find a way to remove a significant portion of the CO2 that we have already deposited into our atmosphere. Absent that, global warming will continue with devastating consequences for all life on this planet.

@adrianfewster8391

2 жыл бұрын

Plants need more CO2 to do batter not less. CO2 does not drive climate, and we need more not less.

@matthewjackson337

3 ай бұрын

​@@adrianfewster8391 you saying that more CO2 is better because it's "more plant food" is like me saying humans should eat a lot more sugary foods as sugar is human food for respiration.

@adrianfewster8391

3 ай бұрын

@@matthewjackson337 That doesn't make sense, sugar is a energy food, that converts to fat if not utilised, and we are are not on the plantlife diet list. However plants are on our diet, and to feed the world more CO2 = more crop production. Try to keep up and understand. If CO2 drops below 150 ppm plantlife will die. Eventually real science will show the planetry movement reasons for real climate change, and show that CO2 is insignificant to climate. 1944 -1976 shows a drop in world temperature during a massive CO2 increase period, and there are plenty more example's in history.

Bring out suppressed technology.

we have reached PEAK FOOD

Stop chopping the bloody trees, rainforests and jungles down and replant on a massive scale. Problem solved.

@SevenEllen

4 жыл бұрын

And how long do you think it'll take 7.8 billion people to plant the TRILLION trees needed? On that note, it's probably more due to deforestation happening all the time and forest fires happening more frequently, undoing reforestation work already done.

@frankblack1185

4 жыл бұрын

Seven Ellen @Seven Ellen When people chop down trees. Flattern mountain ranges then dump the debris into the sea to create new islands, and pollute the seas and oceans it screws up the planets balance It's easyer to try to put the trees back and stop polluting the oceans than it is to put the mountains back.

@JasonSmith709

3 жыл бұрын

The planting of 1 trillion trees would only offset 20% of the CO2 put into the atmosphere so far. It would help, but it's not enough.

If those atoms absorb so much energy, couldn't this absorbed energy be used somehow? Kind of a carbon based solar panel in the upper atmosphere.

@ricktd6891

Жыл бұрын

It would be a waste of time. CO2 is a very weak greenhouse gas. CO2 caused catastrophic global warming is a scam.

@pgress1867

10 ай бұрын

Mostly not.

What is the point of having a panel and a questioner who All have the same opinion ? No argument so rather pointless.

I believe in Climate Change. But doing something about will be VERY costly in both monetary and social terms. To embark on such an undertaking, we must know EXACTLY what we are dealing with. Currently, we do not. We need to invest much more into developing a lot better climate models. See the equally esteemed Professor Tim Palmer's address to the Royal Society on the issue (also available on KZread). That is what I find perplexing - all these people proposing all sorts of measures without first advocating investing in much more powerful computers so we can answer this crucial question.

Things can only get better. *starts shufflin*

Call someone ''Sir'' and I start to take them less seriously.Part of a hierarchical,obedient,society.

Anyone?

That gezzers muttons!

A lot of talk for storage!

CowSpiracy (Netflix doc) ......thoughts on agriculture??

Brian Cox apparently doesn't understand physics. Amazing.

@TDashem

4 ай бұрын

Are you a physicist?

Why are there no climate experts on the panel a particle physicist and a bat expert 🧐

@alienscientist8893

4 жыл бұрын

Exactly..

I've seen no change ever and these two Danish chaps couldn't find any evidence on land or sea in their recent paper 03-18 -Temperature trends with reduced impact of ocean air temperature by Frank Lansner, Jens Olaf Pepke Pedersen

@ASDeckard

4 жыл бұрын

I take it you never read their paper? The conclusion was that there is much more warming seen in ocean wind affected weather stations than inland stations, but we've been counting them equal to each other, despite the overwhelming majority of Earths surface being ocean. They recommended increasing the weight we put on ocean effected area's to get a more accurate estimate, or consider the two area's separately and not add them together. Either way, if there paper is correct, the planet is warming *faster* than we've been measuring, not slower/not at all. Don't cite papers you've never read. It's just spreading misinformation, or at best a wild ass guess.

"planets system" That is non existent man! So your "research" is a lie, you just researched how to make lie..Right? thanks.

Solar #geoengineering is currently in full-scale deployment.

Problem is with renewable energy is it uses up just as much carbon and pollution to make and keep running as just just burning coal we also have to keep coal plants running incase the sun don't shine or the wind don't blow and the biofuel well I don't think burning trees is the answer to burning coal

Let's move to Mars so we can destroy that too.

They make anyone a professor now

But if you go to Eton, and can therefore be in the cabinet, why would you get a science degree?

Yes, it's been warming for about 300 years. Before that, it was cooling for several hundred years. What started the warming 300 years ago? Where's the data that shows the correlation between CO2 and temperature? What caused the ice age? What ended the ice age?

@nyali2

7 ай бұрын

There is data, precise calculations. Hence they won't show you... from 300ppm to 600ppm the forcing is 3,4 W/square meter.... just to put it in perspective we can measure 1361W/ square meter radiation from the sun. We estimate that 70% hits Earth, just imagine a 2% margin of error in that assumption, compared to the 3,4 increase at 600ppm. Joke

I expect a 2 degree C increase from base by September 2018 based on a 50 gigatonne burst of methane from the Arctic in 2017.

@JasonSmith709

3 жыл бұрын

Turns out you were wrong.

@zympf

2 жыл бұрын

Earth has been cooling since 2016 .. refer to the NOAA satellite data

@zympf

2 жыл бұрын

@Christie Malry NOAA satellite global temperature data: 2016 Feb 0.70C -> 2021 Oct 0.37C .. this is direct from the dataset, no opinions or theory, Earth has cooled since 2016

@zympf

2 жыл бұрын

methane is masked by water vapor .. this is alarmism

@zympf

2 жыл бұрын

@Christie Malry Thriving polar bears. Record coral cover. Stable ice-sheets. Bumper snow. Greening planet. Reduced wildfires. Increased Pac island land. Fewer hurricanes. Antarctica record cold winter. CO2 causation not proven. CO2 beneficial. What "climate change"? Its just SOCIALIST GROUPTHINK and TAX GRAB.

The echo in that echo chamber is deafening.

So climate change is not a problem to the species because they evolve. Right? Because evolutionists said that life came to existence through evolution which is "climate change" then why are you talking about climate change while you are bigbangistevolutionists? Thanks.

@alcom4112

7 жыл бұрын

The rate of warming today is much faster than we can derive from reconstructions of the past. We came out of the last glacial maximum almost 20,000 years ago. The warming to modern temperatures took 2000-3000 years. It has been warmer, but it has never changed so quickly. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/paleobefore.html 200 years is a blink in geological and evolutionary time for complex organisms. Species must migrate to survive climate change or they will go extinct. "Biologists suspect we’re living through the sixth major mass extinction. Earth has witnessed five, when more than 75% of species disappeared. Palaeontologists spot them when species go missing from the global fossil record, including the iconic specimens shown here. “We don’t always know what caused them but most had something to do with rapid climate change”, says Melbourne Museum palaeontologist Rolf Schmidt." cosmosmagazine.com/palaeontology/big-five-extinctions

@AsratMengesha

7 жыл бұрын

No no the temperature rise and every thing is due to humans activities. Close the factories then case closed.

10:50 I am sorry, but what in the world is going on in this mans face

Here is something not being mentioned Long Invisible, Research Shows Volcanic CO2 Levels Are Staggering (Op-Ed) by Robin Wylie, University College London | October 15, 2013 07:11pm ET

How long would their boss keep their funding going and keep them in employment if they did have data to say the opposite. Not very long I think. Ride that gravey train.

I think everyone who has a new home should buy Elon musk design on box homes good for the environment get a electric car or hybrid truck for get about the old days thay are gone including government houses 🏘

Ya

I just notice they have the same name…

video is out of sync

I think not.

Boring.... a bunch of people with similar view points on climate. Nothing new or exciting here. Move on.

Small Local Thorium Salt Reactors

bollocks.

imagine taking your car to the garage for service, because you don't know what's wrong with it, and can't fix it yourself, only to have a huge argument with the mechanics about what the problem is. how would you know what you're talking about?

@lukaswilliams5851

3 жыл бұрын

Imagine constantly getting taken advantage of everytime you have a problem and being swindled out of tens of thousands of dollars because you believe anyone blindly.

The agonizing sphere collectively spare because gymnast gradually deserve concerning a cooperative shoe. mighty, obnoxious air

dont the solar panels strip solar flares from the sun so dont you think that part of the cycle would be the shrinking of the sun but when the clouds repair themselves given chance the sun can grow, just a point to point out, not to be complacent but to carry on going, proffessor brian cox sorry about my dyslexia

Methane production could be massively reduced if we all go 100% plants only and stop farming animals. Unfortunately, while some cows can be reintroduced to the wild, most will have to be culled for maximum impact - not very ethical.

Ultimate anti-hero !

w

You will also see theory of relativity fall pretty soon. Or maybe it will not fall in my lifetime if they keep pushing it, but people will for sure become aware for themselves, data is pretty clear on that. They have been managing some pretty crazy mental gymnastics there in order to keep the wrong theory in phase with real observations. It's gonna give right calculations but that's not the point. We are not gonna learn anything if the theory is simply wrong to start with.

7 жыл бұрын

You're a brain damaged imbecile.

@antiprismatic

6 жыл бұрын

Trololololol I love you dude#!! the theory has fallen!!! look up the electric universe project and check out their relativity bashing. they fuck it sooooo hard!