Were you better with biology, chemistry or physics at school? Watch Sunday Brunch on All 4: bit.ly/2JOVlR6

@pbarc552

2 жыл бұрын

“It is on the law of God that the last great struggle of the controversy between Christ and His angels and Satan and his angels will come, and it will be decisive for all the world.... Men in responsible positions will not only ignore and despise the Sabbath themselves, but from the sacred desk will urge upon the people the observance of the first day of the week, pleading tradition and custom in behalf of this man-made institution. They will point to calamities on land and sea-to the storms of wind, the floods, the earthquakes, the destruction by fire-as judgments indicating God’s displeasure because Sunday is not sacredly observed. These calamities will increase more and more, one disaster will follow close upon the heels of another; and those who make void the law of God will point to the few who are keeping the Sabbath of the fourth commandment as the ones who are bringing wrath upon the world. This falsehood is Satan’s device that he may ensnare the unwary.-The Southern Watchman, June 28, 1904. - {ChS 155.2} Coming Events Our people have been regarded as too insignificant to be worthy of notice; but a change will come. The Christian world is now making movements which will necessarily bring commandment-keeping people into prominence. There is a constant supplanting of God’s truth by the theories and false doctrines of human origin. Movements are being set on foot to enslave the consciences of those who would be loyal to God. The law-making powers will be against God’s people. Every soul will be tested.” -Testimonies for the Church 5:546. - {ChS 155.3} American Author & God’s Prophet Ellen G White - written over 100 yrs ago The coming papal inspired worldwide economically church state enforced Sunday Law is the Mark of the Beast described prophetically in the Book of Revelation: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fJyVx6ukZdLZaNI.html A quick bible study that explains why the coming papal inspired worldwide economically church state enforced Sunday Law is the Mark of the Beast described prophetically in the Book of Revelation: kzread.info/dash/bejne/jHZ-z6Sfo7HShtI.html

@a-b-c123

2 ай бұрын

Cox enjoy's his well funded position as an unquestionable voice of '$cience'...

"I would rather have questions not answered than answers not questioned". Richard P. Feynman

He should cover the reason for C3 plants being optimized for growing in an atmosphere with a CO2 pressure of around 1200 ppm. C3 plants become more drought resistant at higher levels of CO2 - that's why the arid parts have been greening for a couple of decades.

One word comes to mind when I her Brian Cox: SMARMY.

Question about climate change at 5:27

@fifikusz

Жыл бұрын

thanks

The beauty of mankind: we spend a lot of money and effort to discover live on an other planet but kill in a very efficiënt way live on earth....

All my cars are old and still serving me well.....you cant get greener than that!

@Thefreakman8

3 жыл бұрын

Yes you absolutely can, if those cars run on petrol/diesel you can get greener by using public transport, walking, cycling, or buying an electric car. In fact given old cars have less efficient engines it may be true to say it is greener to manufacture a new petrol car even as the greenhouse gas generated by production may be offset by the lesser fuel usage. But that's not the point you should be using an low carbon transport.

@trstquint7114

3 жыл бұрын

I refused my whole life to drive a car..you cant get greener than that.

@frankblack7801

3 жыл бұрын

@@Thefreakman8 👤 🕶 Nonsense. A bus has to be at least 66% full of people to save on pollution and how do I take my work tools & get to the middle of nowhere on a bus anyway. It would also take multiple journeys to do my shopping on a bus. Cycle or walk everywhere. Get real. Electric cars run on electricity which has to be produced and 50% of the electricity is lost in transmission before it gets to the plug socket. Like I say, typical environment activist nonsense . . . 🤪

@hornytoad1978

Жыл бұрын

@@Thefreakman8 it takes 5yrs of the energy you would you use driving a normal car , just to create 1 electric car. 🤓

@arturoeugster7228

5 ай бұрын

When the question came up, he just replied in generalities, that shows he has no particular know ledge, probabilities,my foot. Then he talks about measurements,also in generalities. He could simply take a sealed container of Seawater warm it to 70C then open the valve and lead the dissolved gases into a CO2 analyzer, measure the expulsed quantity. Then he could have measured the alkalinity of the Seawater and the cooled deaireated liquid, which would have shown a PH value in excess of 10, typical of a mixture of salts dissolved in water. On the other hand the PH value of Seawater is 8.3 much less alkaline, which makes possible all life in the sea, and at the beginning of life. Plant life requires water, and abundant CO2 to generate the photosynthesis to make glucose, cellulose and lignin. The carbon dating community estimated amount of CO2 in solution in the oceans to be 91% of all CO2 . The solubility is high in cold water,and much lower in warm water. In tropical regions the CO2 is ejected the rich plant life in the tropics, the Amazon Jungle is the result. In contrast the polar near freezing water vehemently absorbs CO2 The rest is obvious.

Going on tour to US, Australia, NZ, Far Arctic, the O2 and who knows where else! And you are worried about Climate Change? You should be ashamed, Brian Cox.

What happened to your global warming Brian?

Does Brian Cox travel on airplanes? That is the question that all climate change alarmists should answer. If they say yes, then do they really believe what they are saying?

@Thefreakman8

3 жыл бұрын

Well first of all it's not a matter of belief. But that is not entirely fair, it's not about a persons Gross emissions produced its about the net effect of them. So for example, if Brian Cox goes on a lecture tour which thousands of people attend, if his lectures persuade people's behaviour to change their change in behaviour may offset the emissions produced by him travelling about to do the tour. Even though in fairness to your pov Greta Thunberg travelled across the atlantic on that zero-Carbon yacht so it is possible to have very low Gross emissions.

@slimpaco3561

3 жыл бұрын

@@Thefreakman8 Greta's maybe less hypocritical then others. Fair point about Cox's lecture tours, but how does he then justify the many other flights. I don't think he took a sailboat to meet Joe Rogen in California.

@Leafsdude_

3 жыл бұрын

Who cares? The evidence is clear and objective. It doesn't matter who believes what.

@frankblack7801

3 жыл бұрын

@@Thefreakman8 👤 🕶 It is absolutely a matter of believe. All snow & ice was supposed to be gone from everywhere on the planet by 2012. Has it gone? NO. Has catastrophic climate change happened? NO. Its a matter of believe. Cox can persuade people by videos like this or use a boat and a train if he has to. I bet it wasn't even a commercial aircraft but a private jet he was on. So again, get real. As for that utter hypocrite Gretta. Did you see the packaging polluting rubbish she had in her electric car? It was full of the stuff. The carbon fibre boat she was on produced 20× more carbon dioxide to manufacture than a regular boat. Aircraft crew had to fly from all over the world to man the boat for her. When you do the math that journey of hers produced as much carbon dioxide as 4 aircraft journeys would of, and thats just one way. Then there was another equivalent of 4 aircraft journeys worth of pollution to get the hypocritical idiot back again. That 8 aircraft journeys worth of pollution for one round trip in a carbon fibre boat. That 6× more pollution than was necessary to get there & back. Like I say, GET REAL!

@frankblack7801

3 жыл бұрын

@@Leafsdude_ Ha ha ha, keep telling yourself that.

```` TIME HAS RUN OUT !! John 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Don't ignore this message... REPENT NOW !! TRUST that God raised Him from the dead !! By FAITH accept JESUS's blood alone as payment for your sins unto Salvation, to escape what's about to happen !!

Very brilliant mind, but he's right he needs separate his emotions from his climate phobia.

@WeirdWackyWonderfool

3 жыл бұрын

Having studied atmospheric science and conservation ecology myself at university, he is justified in his fear.

@cantweallgetalong

3 жыл бұрын

@@WeirdWackyWonderfool What would you point to as the evidence, that anything we can do would significantly alter the reason for his fear? As a student, you might find this basic explanation inspiring. kzread.info/dash/bejne/amGuw7OQccS2cco.html

@jamesforbes2871

2 жыл бұрын

@@WeirdWackyWonderfool ,,, If so, you must have learned that CO2 is NOT the control knob of Earth's weather, nor is there any evidence that we need to panic. We are experiencing natural variation. Temperatures were already rising long before human emissions of CO2 could possibly have affected temperatures.

Brian Cox, of all people, with his extensive knowledge of how the earth's development has been influenced by the sun, by the other planets - Jupiter in particular, the changing tilt of the earth and by so many other factors over millennia, should realise that CO2 and methane have a miniscule effect on our climate compared to all these other forces. Has he been bought or is he funded by big tech?

Facts annoy people.

@lengthmuldoon

3 жыл бұрын

Certainly facts like the platinum standard of temp collation - USCRN - show no issue at all with temps ditto satellite data. Climate activists want to kill when facts like that surface they're only a step away from Charlie Manson

@frankblack7801

3 жыл бұрын

@Ryan G 👤 🕶 Nonsense.

@jamesforbes2871

2 жыл бұрын

I have to wonder what "facts" you were referring to.

@reinforcedpenisstem

2 жыл бұрын

@@jamesforbes2871 You can observe this effect for yourself.

@jamesforbes2871

2 жыл бұрын

@@reinforcedpenisstem ... How can I observe the effect when you have presented no facts? Your original statement is both vague and a hasty generalization. Which people ... what facts?

how can anyone believe the BS he spews??? LOL, sold his soul like all of politics, music and Hollywood, Bollywood, religion, nasa etc..

@frankblack7801

3 жыл бұрын

👤 🕶 👍

Sorry Brian, climate change is not a existential threat to humans or all life on Earth. As a scientist you should know better than to purport such balderdash.

@jamesforbes2871

2 жыл бұрын

He's shilling for the BBC. They have an editorial mandate to push any nonsense at all in support of AGW. The actual science is unimportant to him even if he does understand it (he doesn't).

@CaptanF0rever

Жыл бұрын

It could in the long term. I mean centuries from now of course. Not making some course correction before the damage is irreversible is important. I'd be more concerned about saving plantlife than driving combustion vehicles though.

Brian would do much better serving behind the pulpit. 'Big Bang' when he's referring to God. 'Meaning on earth' when he speaks of the gospel. 'Vast universe' to the glory of His creation... As to a democratic climate, well, enough said~

Simply put ... Bryan should know that the term "climate change" is nonsense. This planet doesn't have a climate. It has numerous climates. Trying to somehow average them all, when climate is already an average of weather, at a particular location, over time is silly. It has about as much meaning as an average telephone number. It's equivocation ... an appeal to ambiguity at best.

@BearRiots

Жыл бұрын

The issue is the rate of change. This guy does a great job of explaining milankovitch cycles and why human induced co2 is disrupting the natural process kzread.info/dash/bejne/p6Wr2MhvgpTFgbw.html

this prat loves the sound of his own voice, he is a politicised bluff scientist

@solentforest

3 жыл бұрын

Jealousy will get you nowhere 💗😜

@ArthurYuill

3 жыл бұрын

Brian look, you can always read a primary school geography book to actually get the facts across, there’s no shame in learning

@vendomnu

2 жыл бұрын

@@ArthurYuill Propaganda usually starts in the free school books or free initiatives that the school doesn't have to pay for.

@ArthurYuill

2 жыл бұрын

@@vendomnu ask any qualified scientist then if you wanna go that route mate

@joshualukebamford

Жыл бұрын

If that’s the conclusion you draw then there’s no hope for you. Or the rest of us because of people like you. Ah sigh.

When you watch back Brian a decade ago, he was saying a few hundred billion stars in a few hundred billion galaxies. Now he is saying trillions of galaxies. It seems that science is changing. Yet climate change is certainly caused by co2...ahhha.. I used to respect him.

@simontunnicliffe2107

Жыл бұрын

So you're denying climate change is real? if so, all's it seems to me is you're trying to do with statements such as the one I'm replying to, is to try a pick fault or find one little grain of "oh he said this once or that back then" to justify or back up a narrative of 'oh let's not give a s***t about our planet' and carry on polluting it because he or she said billions instead of trillions several years ago.

@nyali2

Жыл бұрын

@@simontunnicliffe2107 I am saying it is way beyond our understanding what is going on. There is no evidence that CO2 is causing the change we are experiencing. We don’t even know if it is normal or not. Yet this subject has been so seriously polarized, that asking questions is regarded as blasphemy. My example is only a proof that science has been rapidly changing, yet he has forgotten this tiny detail… I wonder why.. not really

@simontunnicliffe2107

Жыл бұрын

@@nyali2 It has been proven and I will link you a video explaining how they know. Doesn't seem too far fetched that dirty fossil fuels aren't good for the atmosphere. Also I could link you a clip in a science lab from BBC's Hot Planet documentary about 11 years ago shows you how Co2 burning heats up the atmosphere burnt. Will do both on my desktop comp later today.

@nyali2

Жыл бұрын

@@simontunnicliffe2107 don’t bother, I am familiar with climate forcing. They haven’t proven anything, we don’t have working models, we are at the stage of guessing. Yet we are about to change our social economical structures based on a guess, as it was a fact. It is about controlling you and your taxes in a post fossil era, which is near. What is telling in this story is, that scientists are ridiculed and sidelined if they don’t play ball, that is how you can tell it is a propaganda.

@simontunnicliffe2107

Жыл бұрын

@@nyali2 Nah. It has been proven using ice cores in the Antarctic. You just want to keep peddling the "it's nonsense" story. That's why 99% of scientists are in agreement about it.