Boeing Just SHOCKED Everyone Now At The Dubai Airshow! Here's Why

Boeing just shocked everyone at the 2023 Dubai Air Show.
For 5 days, aircraft manufacturers had deals for their aircrafts announced by numerous airlines and lessors. However, unlike the Paris Air Show conducted back in August, trends seemed to be reversed here with Boeing shocking everyone while Airbus surprisingly lagged behind.
Can you guess which one? Let’s find out!

Пікірлер: 153

  • @jw427
    @jw4276 ай бұрын

    The root cause of Boeing's problems are the result of putting the bean counters in charge instead of engineers, the way it had been for 50+ years. When they became more interested in the stock price vs producing a quality product, that was the downfall. Just like so many businesses before them, they took a stellar rep for quality, reliability and safety and flushed it all away for short sighted profit motives.

  • @vanguard9067

    @vanguard9067

    6 ай бұрын

    Agreed. The bean counters should be made to fly as passengers in the very first test flights:-)

  • @titob.yotokojr.9337

    @titob.yotokojr.9337

    6 ай бұрын

    ​@@vanguard9067Can't wait to fly both the 777X and the 737 Max. No need for the "bean counters" to test fly the planes because I volunteer. 😊

  • @buckwheat1070

    @buckwheat1070

    6 ай бұрын

    Thanks anonymous guy on the internet! Glad you had time to come and tell us all your vast knowledge about the aircraft manufacturing industry and Boeing in particular. We’re looking forward to your further astute and insider knowledge commentary. Sincerely, -The whole KZread community.

  • @cliffmorgan31

    @cliffmorgan31

    6 ай бұрын

    Buckwheat- You don’t need to be a Boeing expert nor aviation expert to know this is absolutely true. It is blatantly obvious to the casual observer. Also, bringing McD management aboard as management was a large step in the wrong direction. Buckwheat, being snarkey does not make you smart.

  • @jolness1

    @jolness1

    6 ай бұрын

    Agreed. McDonnell Douglas basically bought Boeing and their reputation with Boeings money.

  • @Stan7670
    @Stan76706 ай бұрын

    Glad to see Boeing doing well.

  • @othmarbrunner9639

    @othmarbrunner9639

    6 ай бұрын

    Agreed as a matter of fact it is nice to see that airbus and Boeing are doing well competition is the best thing to produce good quality of anything

  • @samku-uv5lo

    @samku-uv5lo

    6 ай бұрын

    Boeing was the best and the oldest and will be the best for ever They all copy what Boeing did in the past The queen of the sky That shocked the world 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @jolness1
    @jolness16 ай бұрын

    Boeing was testing a 777x-9 (BOE2) in and out of my local airport here in Montana. It’s a small airport but has an over 10k foot runway. Just happened to be there watching and they did 3 landing and takeoffs, was so cool. Hope they can get it launched, and really hope Boeing moves toward being more engineering driven. They should move management back to Seattle imo.

  • @Crazyuncle1

    @Crazyuncle1

    6 ай бұрын

    They should move management to the unemployment line.

  • @user-xs3ec1ci6x
    @user-xs3ec1ci6x4 ай бұрын

    Glad that Boeing is back!

  • @Inkling777
    @Inkling7776 ай бұрын

    Sounds like the ability to fulfill orders are the chief problem for Airbus and Boeing rather than orders. Airlines must buy now for deliveries years in the future. Both aviation giants need to expand their production rate.

  • @vicg5323
    @vicg53236 ай бұрын

    I love the 777 and even more the Dreamliner with mood lighting. Can wait to see how Emirates business class configuration will be?

  • @Dan.d649
    @Dan.d6496 ай бұрын

    I'm glad good things are in store for Boeing. If they don't have an MMA at the moment, that would be at the back burner right now. The 737-MAX-7, and MAX-10 are about to be certified, so all the deliveries for all those airplanes will presumably start with commitments from airlines that recently placed orders for them. The 777-9X will begin deliveries soon as well. This would put Boeing into focus on the new 787-10-IGW variant that's being closely looked at by American Airlines, United, and Etihad. It has an extended 500 mile range and increased gross weight, as opposed to the regular 787-10. This new airplane can be a big plus for Boeing in the future. I think they are on the right track now, so we'll see the outcome.

  • @reubenmorris487

    @reubenmorris487

    6 ай бұрын

    777-9X isn't ready for deliveries yet. Production is still at a trickle.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    @@reubenmorris487 no its not. production will resume next month!

  • @tomjoseph1444
    @tomjoseph14446 ай бұрын

    If Clark (Emirates) wants reliable aircraft, I am sure they are regretting the A-380. The A-380 is called the A-180 by mechanics due to the frequency of return to gate due to problems.

  • @happysavy9296
    @happysavy92966 ай бұрын

    Great to hear for Boeing. There has been some bad decisions in the past at Boeing that looks to have been fixed as it reflects in their sales and confidence back in their fleet. As for the 737 Max is probably the safest plane to fly right now as there has been so much focus to ensure that plan has no more issues and maybe some Airlines are getting a deal for max purchases for them. I flew the Max a few months ago and it was a great roomy plane for a 737.

  • @kevinwelsh7490
    @kevinwelsh74906 ай бұрын

    I'm totally shocked!

  • @jeno826
    @jeno8266 ай бұрын

    I can all most say,that the 777x is the sexiest looking among all this beauty’s !

  • @HoLeeChit11

    @HoLeeChit11

    6 ай бұрын

    almost, these beauties,

  • @tomc.2808
    @tomc.28086 ай бұрын

    Cannot shock anyone more than with MAX...👀

  • @GH-oi2jf

    @GH-oi2jf

    6 ай бұрын

    Yesterday’s news.

  • @gilbertfranklin1537
    @gilbertfranklin15376 ай бұрын

    Boeing is a great manufacturer, and they make good aircraft. They deserve these orders. Quit acting surprised.

  • @Seasherm
    @Seasherm6 ай бұрын

    Boeing became Lockheed when they bought Lockheed and the Lockheed execs started running Boeing. That's when the problems started. They farmed out too much engineering and didn't trust their own Engineers. Hence all of the problems since then. They are more interested in farming the Pentagon now.

  • @stevewallace1117

    @stevewallace1117

    6 ай бұрын

    Uh, it was McDonnell Douglas not Lockheed.

  • @stuartlee6622

    @stuartlee6622

    6 ай бұрын

    ​@@stevewallace1117Exactly, you're right!

  • @DJAYPAZ

    @DJAYPAZ

    6 ай бұрын

    Subcontracting too many subassemblies has caused a lot of problems for Boeing. In recent times Boeing has brought a number component and subassembly manufacturing back in house. Poorly performing subcontractors having been dumped, and not before time. While not the end of manufacturing difficulties it is a least a positive step towards better quality control.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    @@DJAYPAZ Airbus has done the same so what's the alternative for the two then?

  • @DJAYPAZ

    @DJAYPAZ

    6 ай бұрын

    @@nickolliver3021 Good question. There is no alternative, Airbus and Boeing dominate the global market for mainstream passenger jets.

  • @Yves_Ka
    @Yves_Ka6 ай бұрын

    Orders are made, altered and cancelled constantly. Boeing and Airbus are both light years away of keeping up with any orders. The new 777 have not even been certified.

  • @erichter66
    @erichter666 ай бұрын

    I love flying the 777. The A380 and the Dreamliner being right up there as well. But that may change, now that I will have to start flying coach :-(

  • @kingjames8283
    @kingjames82835 ай бұрын

    I would love to see a resurgence of the wide body tri-jets like the Lockheed L-1011.

  • @MSimmonsAZ
    @MSimmonsAZ6 ай бұрын

    Interesting they have a shot of Phoenix SkyHarbor at 7:54.

  • @MK-xc9to
    @MK-xc9to6 ай бұрын

    Well , the Orderbook from Airbus is full , new Orders will be delivered maybe 2026/2027 , there is still a backlog . Maybe Emirates dont wanted to wait ... From the 1056 Orders for a A350 ( total) there are currently 565 delivered ( 10/23 ) = 491 have to be build and from the A321 neo are 222 delivered (09/23) of a total Orderbook of 696 = 474 still have to be build source : Airbus , you can Download an xls sheet , there you can even see which Airline got which Plane in the Deliveries Section , the gross Orders and the cancellations

  • @jamesalexander6069
    @jamesalexander60696 ай бұрын

    Get them

  • @MrRockydee07
    @MrRockydee076 ай бұрын

    The last flight I took was in an Airbus A320. we were stuck on the ground for more than one hour because they couldn't get the plane started .😢

  • @simbacuty944
    @simbacuty9446 ай бұрын

    i like a350

  • @TheDwightMamba
    @TheDwightMamba6 ай бұрын

    Making the 747 into a twin would be so sexy.

  • @jimmy-et1pm

    @jimmy-et1pm

    6 ай бұрын

    They did....its called the 777x

  • @alejandroaston3821
    @alejandroaston38216 ай бұрын

    WOW BOIENG CONGRATS

  • @Howrider65
    @Howrider656 ай бұрын

    I wish they would make the 717 again.

  • @markiangooley

    @markiangooley

    6 ай бұрын

    A good plane from the remnants of McDonnell-Douglas. It’s pretty much the A220 niche, though, without the range and efficiency. I flew on them a lot when AirTran had most of them.

  • @steveb7429
    @steveb74296 ай бұрын

    I can’t help but notice that underlying subtext in the video that tries to appear neutral, but is actually pro-Airbus and anti-Boeing . Given the narrator’s British accent, maybe that’s not so much of a surprise.

  • @winoseti
    @winoseti6 ай бұрын

    probably due to waiting times

  • @gtmark1239
    @gtmark12396 ай бұрын

    I have not flown much but does anyone else have a problem with there being only one engine on each wing? That scares the crap out of me. I want a backup at least.

  • @user-le1te9hg4p
    @user-le1te9hg4p6 ай бұрын

    Sorry mate but the USA's FAA is the Federal Aviation Administration and not the Federal Aviation Authority as you said in the video! Am I pedantic? NO, I am an accurate researcher before I write or record videos.

  • @letzgobrandon5007
    @letzgobrandon50076 ай бұрын

    It’s no Catalina Wine Mixer

  • @stevenwagner9912
    @stevenwagner99126 ай бұрын

    Somebody named an airline " SCAT"? Glad I had swallowed my coffee.

  • @pasha_che
    @pasha_che6 ай бұрын

    So Emirates has both the President and the CEO. Let me guess why...

  • @edmundcasey7765
    @edmundcasey77656 ай бұрын

    congratulations!!! BOEING!!! I HOPE BOEING WILL NOT DISSAPPOINT. . . . LIKE 737 MAX. . . bring the 757 back, , ,

  • @MWS1960
    @MWS19606 ай бұрын

    Interesting I heard that the Airbus was the direction most carriers are taking and Emirates was on that order list. Reason why they chose Airbus was that airbus was 20M less and had a longer range. So they cancelled Boeings orders.

  • @garyhughes2446
    @garyhughes24466 ай бұрын

    What's the triple 7 gen x, Boeing has either been very lucky or the jet is actually as good as it is purported to be or both. But if Boeing can't get it delivered this time by the promise date it could be their downfall, customers will not wait forever, and I believe for Boeing it is almost forever. With all the problems they're having with the triple 7x you would think that Boeing has never brought a big multi-engine jet into service before. Joe Sutter one of the best; sure could use him now, may he rest in peace.

  • @johnwoodall3791
    @johnwoodall37916 ай бұрын

    Let me just clarify something. When i commented on the Boeing Product i based my opinion on past and recent reports by the FAA along issues it needs to follow to gain certification. I want nothing more than to see Boeing match and overhaul Airbus. I have always wanted Boeing to Succeed in all areas and if they get it all perfectly right then we can say Boeing has found their mark and its offerings are more than a match for Airbus Aircraft. It is important that the we have a Secured and safe product so as to ensure the future of the Boeing Brand. It is pretty simple to calculate what would happen otherwise.

  • @FeHu939
    @FeHu9396 ай бұрын

    Hate these long body cattle cars, can’t wait for the new 747 if it is like the old.

  • @lambertois11
    @lambertois116 ай бұрын

    I am very skeptical about the future of Emirate Airlines.

  • @ianplowman8689
    @ianplowman86896 ай бұрын

    All speculation regarding the Boeing.

  • @jakleo337
    @jakleo3376 ай бұрын

    And the comac C919 comes away with a whopping ZERO orders.

  • @jonlim1396

    @jonlim1396

    6 ай бұрын

    Mungkin mereka akan menguasai pasar domestik china. Seperti weibo dan tencen

  • @jonlim1396

    @jonlim1396

    6 ай бұрын

    😊😊

  • @markiangooley
    @markiangooley6 ай бұрын

    Rolls-Royce name their engines after rivers. I think they need to move on from the Trent name. Maybe it will have to wait for a sufficiently big change in design. I’m rooting for the name Ouse.

  • @daveh1081

    @daveh1081

    6 ай бұрын

    Hmmmmm.......or Swale???

  • @MrMopar413
    @MrMopar4136 ай бұрын

    As I’ve read some of the other comments. Boeing needs to develop a plane that fills the gap between the 737 and the 777. Boeing needs to fill the gap after dropping the 757 and 767 aircraft, big mistake. Maybe they could build a plane with a wider fuselage and 2 different lengths airframe and call it the 767-XB or something similar or the Boeing 800 series denoting a hole new aircraft family in the 200 seat capacity with double isle. The engine technology technology is on the shelf right now. I think it’s a matter of getting out pencil & paper and slide rulers and start brainstorming. If Kelly Johnson can design the SR-71 in the 60’s-??, why can’t Boeing design a new aircraft to fill the void that the cancellation of the 757 and 767 left. Those where and still are great aircraft. They are still flying but as rehabilitated freight haulers by all the big boys. Come on Boeing get to work. It shouldn’t be that hard.,I’d think most of the technology is on the shelf right now. With the mistakes learned from the 737 max debacle and the technology in the 737 max with a new 800 series aircraft all they need to do is design the airframe and wings and crunch the numbers and apply the philosophy of KISS - keep it simple, stupid it would rock the aviation world. In other worlds just get back to basics build a decent aircraft and it will sell itself. Like any human being nobody likes drama in their lives. It’s all about turn & burn over and over again. Downtime is a real killer to the bottom line . When it’s all said and done at the end of the day no matter what -!!! , it’s the bottom line in any business.

  • @jjgreek1
    @jjgreek16 ай бұрын

    If it’s not Boeing I’m not going!

  • @indridcold8433
    @indridcold84335 ай бұрын

    If it's boeing, consider not going. Fly Airbus, always looking out for all of us.

  • @russell7489
    @russell74896 ай бұрын

    So you mean flying high capacity "4 engine jumbo jet" replacments with just two engines results in problems keeping the double power engines on the wings? Who would have thought. Gov'ts even allowing over ocean international flights of twin engine planes is morally bankrupt. We are told they can turn up the one remaining engine and fly 1/2 way just on that but that engine has trouble staying on the wing, needs more maint so super charging it might push it over the edge of it's increased maint needs.

  • @haroldk724
    @haroldk7246 ай бұрын

    dubai.....will never see them

  • @capeko44
    @capeko446 ай бұрын

    Being AD

  • @johnwoodall3791
    @johnwoodall37916 ай бұрын

    Boeing have got to get it Right with the 777 Dash 8 and 9 and the 737 7 and 10 Series or its handing Airbus a Runaway Shot at the Market Place as well as the current 787 Series of Aircraft. Good Video, Was well Worth Watching.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    why do they need to get it right with the 77-9 and 8 and 737 7 and 10? they already have!

  • @johnwoodall3791

    @johnwoodall3791

    6 ай бұрын

    @@nickolliver3021 Simple, Look at the situation, they have had problems with the 737 max programme, issues regarding the 787 series and 777 series, i love Boeing aircraft of that you can be certain, the FAA reports have shown the reasons so with all due respects to yourself unless you have taken the time to read them i would suggest before responding to my comrnent about getting it right. The issues are clearly stated. Also we have seen independent non biased opinion. I have made an opinion based upon engineering fsctors. I am certain they will overcome this because i am sure that we all know that it is important to have aircraft that can out weigh airbus where it matters and thats the airliner order books.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    @@johnwoodall3791 So the fact you are basing this on tne 737max problems with tne program and issues regarding 787 series and 777 series? Have you not been keeping up or something or are you playing it down because you just base it on previous events. I just told you they have already got it right with the 777 program. I suggest you read some news articles published this year about the 777. The 787 issues are mostly supplier related and so has tne 737max program. The issues are clearly stated by FAA all relating to supplier related problems. The opinion isn't based on engineering factors. Its based on what has happened on tbe past and expecting it to still be problematic. Seriously. Wake up

  • @johnwoodall3791

    @johnwoodall3791

    6 ай бұрын

    @@nickolliver3021 As you should. Based upon fact that is all. No not on passed issues with the 737 Max. I have read the FAA reports right up to this very moment in time. I am not Down Playing Anything what so Ever. I am not a Biased Person. I am Wide Awake thanks all the same. Suggest you take a Cold Shower and Cool off. Seems to Myself that your Opinion is Based on what you believe as Fact and not that of anyone else. It was a Simple Statement. Why do you want to turn it into that of a major rebuke. The old saying that everyone is Entitled to an Opinion doesn't ring true with yourself. I have seen the papers yes. Nothing is as Clear Cut as you make it out to be Sir.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    @@johnwoodall3791 Yes definitely with the passed issues with the 737 Max. Oh you actually have read the FAA reports right up until this very moment in time lmao! That was obviously made up. It doesn't look like you are wide awake if you still believe that Boeing needs to get the 777 together yet they already have. Does that not make any sense to you? My Facts are based on current reports posted this year. And yours? It is simple to understand and find out for yourself from those reports/articles this year. Well sadly your opinion is not up to date sadly. its fallen behind with the rest of us who know what we follow and see that gets posted daily of these programs that have yet to be certified!

  • @bigboybuilder
    @bigboybuilder5 ай бұрын

    Shocked in so much as it didn't crash?

  • @jlmarc01
    @jlmarc016 ай бұрын

    Airbus only makes the A320s family that sells. Airbus needs to be ready to produce larger aircraft with greater consistency or they can really fall behind . Last gossip heard was the A330 Neo came out as a winner at the Paris show. Now I hear that’s not the case. So much misinformation by many fanboys here. Airbus had a tendency in supplying poor engines . Look at the weak Engines at A340s

  • @royrice8021
    @royrice80216 ай бұрын

    Try a barrel roll! 😱😱😳

  • @paulcloetens9582
    @paulcloetens95826 ай бұрын

    I fly often Emirats with Boeing 777 .

  • @mag-rat4060
    @mag-rat40606 ай бұрын

    Boeing is the most experienced airline ,, Never count Boeing out.. 👌👍

  • @Fyrfotaanders
    @Fyrfotaanders6 ай бұрын

    Pyjamaparty? 😅

  • @davidsheriff8989
    @davidsheriff89896 ай бұрын

    Positive Boeing News for once...

  • @BanditAviation
    @BanditAviationАй бұрын

    Well, at least Airbus made tougher bodies than Boeing. Boeing had body defects, which is 50x's worse. After the 2 737 max 8s? Boeing is still not doing well.

  • @r.k.purkayastha8796
    @r.k.purkayastha87966 ай бұрын

    We are getting news that Jamju jet Boing 747 which ha been remodeled or refined to meet ne requirment I the ne entrant in car market ,,,,,,,,ould ou let u know ho the plane I different from it earlier version

  • @wheelsofafrica
    @wheelsofafrica6 ай бұрын

    This report contains too much waffle and repetitiveness.

  • @Fly-Road
    @Fly-Road6 ай бұрын

    Airbus doesn’t seem to fall behind, check what was for example the Air France klm order for the 350-1000. Kind of pro Boeing video for sure

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    The fact they won the orders over airbus at the airshow tells you boeing are coming back!

  • @Fly-Road

    @Fly-Road

    6 ай бұрын

    I don’t think so, 787 issues 777x issues I don’t speak about the 737 max, it’s time for Boeing to improve quality and to make new aircraft and not making aircraft’s based on old concept just for money. Airbus is ahead in so many concept. The fms of the 787 is so old, the vertical path management of Boeing aircraft is so far behind Airbus. Flying qualities are very good i have to admit and electric compressor are great 👍🏻. That is the only advantage even cabin pressure is lower on the a350. Got it

  • @markrhuett

    @markrhuett

    6 ай бұрын

    ​@philippegervais3721 is that why airlines are ordering them in droves?

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    @@Fly-Road 787 issues 777x issues? What ones are you talking about? Boeing has supiets that are sending bad quality components in which boeing van only do so much about. The suppliers are the ones that need to improve their quality but how about airbus as they should be making new aircraft instead of basing new on old concepts just for money? Aurbus isn't always ahead in concept. How is the fms so old in the 787 compared to vertical path management of boeing aircraft is so far behind airbus? The cabin pressure is lower in 787 and 737 and 777. The a350 has the same. Its called modernisation

  • @Fly-Road

    @Fly-Road

    6 ай бұрын

    Not really at all

  • @yabbadabbadoo8225
    @yabbadabbadoo82256 ай бұрын

    The world population is raging faster than the rate planes can be produced at At some stage a 3rd major player will surface Nobody is taking about Africa yet, soon to be 2B people.

  • @nealrcn
    @nealrcn5 ай бұрын

    I hate when giant airliners do stupid maneuver's.

  • @JJ4213FL
    @JJ4213FL6 ай бұрын

    The 777X is a sexy plane. I absolutely hate any version of the 737. Boeing dropped the ball by further developing the 737 instead of the 757. Too cramped and an ancient obsolete design. The cattle car of the skies.

  • @fonkenful

    @fonkenful

    6 ай бұрын

    FWIW, I recently completed a trip from west coast of Canada to Montreal, Toronto to Bermuda and return, all on Air Canada. For some strange reason the shortest of a total of 5 legs of this group - Montreal to Toronto- was on a 737-8 with that still “new car smell”. While this is the first time we’ve been to Montreal, we’ve made the Victoria - Bermuda trip at least 10 times in the past 15 years, and until this trip I’d have agreed with your assessment of the 737 class; my preference would have been for either the A319 or A320 - but with the major interior update on the 737 Max8, I think Boeing has really got their shit together. Within the past 5 years, we’ve also been to Maui and the Grand Canyon (via Las Vegas) which has allowed us to experience single and twin aisled models from both makers. Given a choice, I’d take an A330 any day of the week, but the 737’s refresh was a huge surprise, but unfortunately that was on the shortest leg of the itinerary - less than an hour from Montreal to Toronto.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    go tell Boeing that all 737s are too cramped and obsolete design! and dropped the ball!

  • @fonkenful

    @fonkenful

    6 ай бұрын

    @@nickolliver3021 Considering that Boeing has been able to stretch the lifespan of the basic fuselage and wing design of the 737 for a period of almost 60 years, and that the seating configurations/ pitch in all makes and models is at the discretion of individual airlines, I’d be inclined to give them credit at least for squeezing as much juice from this citrus as they have. That said, when configured for 168, “cattle car” is a reasonable description for most iterations of this model I’ve encountered in my almost 40 yrs of occasional traveling . To a lesser degree, the same could be said for the A319 (120), )and A320 Layout 1 (146); Layout 2, on the other hand that Air Canada used for all business class is the same length, but configured for 70. Yup, the 777 is a totally different beast, but at almost twice the length and 67% wider, there’s certainly a lot more to work with. But if you want to talk flying school bus, there’s always the DeHavilland Dash 8-400 - fortunately we’ve only ever had to experience that as a 15 minute puddle jumper. Anyways, we now return to our regularly scheduled keyword bloviations. 🤭

  • @MrMopar413

    @MrMopar413

    6 ай бұрын

    You got that right

  • @roddychristodoulou9111
    @roddychristodoulou91116 ай бұрын

    I can only assume Boeing offered major discounts at the air show after accepting they're losing the race to Airbus .

  • @americanknow8232
    @americanknow82325 ай бұрын

    How much can you trust Boeing? Not much

  • @stephensmith1553
    @stephensmith15536 ай бұрын

    No matter how you try and dress this article up in favour of Boeing Airbus are still miles ahead on product and orders and always will be I wonder how much Boeing paid you for this push to try and make us all think that Boeing are even close to making a real comeback

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    The fact you say Airbus will be miles ahead on product and orders and always will be tells me airbus is better. Boeing is coming back dont worry because you dont see the reality here and believe Airbus will always outdo them!

  • @lebelge1910
    @lebelge19106 ай бұрын

    Lol like Boeing never have problems ;)

  • @zakobrien8764
    @zakobrien87646 ай бұрын

    777X is one of the "most troubled" Boeing aircraft?? What planet do you live on? The 777 has been one of the most SUCCESSFUL commercial aircraft ever developed. I'm not going to even watch the rest of this video past that idiotic comment. I think you were referring to the 737 Max, nimrod.

  • @IAmSpeaking4MySelf
    @IAmSpeaking4MySelf6 ай бұрын

    There can be no doubt, with those orders, scat is going to be flying all over the world. (dark humor)💩💩💩

  • @alevans51
    @alevans516 ай бұрын

    Not impressed.

  • @brunnoperlati8730
    @brunnoperlati87306 ай бұрын

    Electric engines ARE finally ready.

  • @hj8272

    @hj8272

    6 ай бұрын

    To power toilets?

  • @ajman031790
    @ajman0317906 ай бұрын

    The airbus boys are big mad 😡 Look at these comments 😂

  • @Rob-yj9ew
    @Rob-yj9ew6 ай бұрын

    Drama Queen Clark and Emirates are known for their way of doing business. Crying they can not get any A380 anymore after killing the program. The are know for playing with the manufacturers and for the fact they know more abut planes and engines than the manufacturers, wether is is boeing, airbus, GE, RR or any other. All airplane manufcturers have the same problems now, the engines...... And now they order extra 777X, BUT the first HAS to be delivered in 2025...... the plane is not even certified. So an easy out for them. Airbus and Boeing should hold their ground and otherwise Emirates can buy their planes by Comac.

  • @theoccupier1652
    @theoccupier16526 ай бұрын

    Yawn

  • @rosewhite---
    @rosewhite---6 ай бұрын

    When Jesus returns one third of all planes will fall from the sky. Fly at your peril.

  • @othmarbrunner9639
    @othmarbrunner96396 ай бұрын

    The 737 Max crashes could have been avoided with experienced pilots The faulty sensors could have been overridden and the planes could have been flown manually It is totally ir-responsible to blame Boeing for these crashes Videos which are always playing airbus against Boeing is counter productive since both companies make excellent planes

  • @ravennightingale1260

    @ravennightingale1260

    6 ай бұрын

    This is simply untrue. The pilots were told the MAX was just like old 737s, they didn't even know MCAS **existed**. It wasn't part of autopilot, "manual" flight was still subject to MCAS and therefore subject to being flown into the ground by a single bad sensor. Shocking negligence on Boeing's part to create a single point of failure, and they rushed it through certification and deliberately skipped the training to keep it type-compatible for money reasons.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    @@ravennightingale1260 it wasn't pure negligence on Boeings part. Okay we all know they made a mistake on this. Airbus has been skipping things too for sure for money reasons and has made planes with single points of failure and have rushed through certification of aircraft over the years

  • @GH-oi2jf

    @GH-oi2jf

    6 ай бұрын

    Boeing made a huge mistake with the MAX in abondoning their long practice of giving the pilots ultimate control of the aircraft, then compounded the problem by trying to sweep it under the rug, blaming the pilots. This is well documented today.

  • @nickolliver3021

    @nickolliver3021

    6 ай бұрын

    @@GH-oi2jf Airbus has done many things that they have swept under the rug! it runs in the industry and they get away with it! we should have the industry close for good that is well documented today!

  • @othmarbrunner9639

    @othmarbrunner9639

    6 ай бұрын

    False an independent French investigation clearly states that these two crashes could have been avoided with experienced pilots The faulty sensors could have been overridden and the planes could have been controlled manually This is pretty well understood in the industry by knowledgeable people and that is the reason why the plane is selling like hotcakes One of my son was a co pilot for the A220, Boeing 787 and now is a pilot on the Max 737 and he thinks this is one of the best and safest airplanes It is very dangerous and slandering to blame a company when not knowing the facts

  • @titshit
    @titshit6 ай бұрын

    Pure Propaganda ! It is of course Boeing that has the problems. Classic fact reversal !

  • @cameraman655
    @cameraman6556 ай бұрын

    Eh…just a fluke, Airbus will regain their rightful spot as the “Plane Maker To The World”. Boeing is now and will remain a distant second from the superior aircraft maker of the world “EUROPEAN STRONG💪…” America…weak…🤣. C’mon world, let's put these Yanks in their place…

  • @Howdydoody1878
    @Howdydoody18786 ай бұрын

    Let engineers do their job, everyone else needs to get in line..

  • @KrollDan
    @KrollDan6 ай бұрын

    NICE

  • @mwtechnologies8603
    @mwtechnologies86036 ай бұрын

    anybody buying China C919

  • @Tomwhite-gj4dp

    @Tomwhite-gj4dp

    11 күн бұрын

    No - let it fly in china for 20 years before anybody outside China would even consider it