777x : I am tired of standing ..anyone for a stroll? Van: yup I’m in!

@shhaabu

5 жыл бұрын

😁😁😁 dope

When they said the GE9X is big they really meant that its REALLY BIG

@shantanu925

5 жыл бұрын

Bigger than the car near it

@chriscota7337

5 жыл бұрын

Shunpo ITS HUMONGOUS THE 777X IS HUMONGOUS

@johnniechang0906

5 жыл бұрын

Bigger than my house...

@tyrael280

5 жыл бұрын

hope not that big that it needs a MCAS....

@camerongrant317

5 жыл бұрын

@@tyrael280 jesus christ....move on

Wow, she's a real beauty!!! Can't wait to see her fly and hopefully fly in it one day... Long live 777X💪💪💪

@j-c4997

5 жыл бұрын

Erwin Brzoska 50th like and yes I totally agree!

What a beast . Engine's made chase vehicle look like a toy.!!!

@azreenklose7976

5 жыл бұрын

That beast can suck the car and destroy it in no time.......

@38911bytefree

5 жыл бұрын

The jet will run over it without even noticing it. Like steping on a roach.

0:06 That folding wings is fantastic

Great Video mate! Thanks for sharing 👍🏻 JD

Dammm what a beauty thanks so much for sharing

who else doesn't feel too confident about those folding wings

GE9X...Those Engines!!! I'm in love!!

WOW that's fantastic . 777 always a king in widebody segment aircraft's

@38911bytefree

5 жыл бұрын

Well, A350 is trying to get where the 777 is now, but, the 777x is comming ... so ... Boeing will win this segment I think.

@nolenhughes2464

5 жыл бұрын

@@38911bytefree A350 doesnt quite have the pax capacity, I don't believe. A 777-10 would probably become the new superjumbo after the retirement of 747s and A380s.

@Racko.

5 жыл бұрын

@@38911bytefree Boeing has the Widebody Segment, A350 cannot meet the pax capacity and payload, Freighter and Passenger Capacity standard to be truly competitive to the Higher 777X Series in many aspects. Unless they're able to make a completely new Jet which they have a true 777X competition, otherwise it's the A380 and 747 which have been slaughtered by the 777 in the first place

Those ge9x engines look so great on the 777x.

@everettrailfan

5 жыл бұрын

Ikr. The crazy thing is, you can fit a 737 fuselage inside a GE90!!!

Omg what a beauty! And those engine those size compared to the car😱

@38911bytefree

5 жыл бұрын

If pilots touch the trust control a bit, this car will just get sucked. Gigantic engines for a majestic jet

Gorgeous plane!

Wow. The wing span is insane!!

Gosh those GE9X are thrilling to roar!!

Lets hope that Boeing go stright to the target with this beauty. What a magnificent airliner

@aviationismylife6814

5 жыл бұрын

Boeing ain't stupid they have to get everything right with 777

Poetry in motion👍

the Boeing 777 series is one of America's greatest pieces of art. I never used to give twin engines the time of day, but along came these beauties and I begrudgingly succumbed to them. Now I even enjoy looking at A330 and A350 as well.

That is one beautiful bird

Jesus!!! Look at the size of that GE9X. Beautiful aircraft.

Beautiful aircraft!

Now those are some massive engines right there.

Hope we soon have this amazing bird flying around the world!!

Those GE9X would work great on the 737 MAX. Just move them forward a bit and adjust the trim. Perfect.

@ndos4436

5 жыл бұрын

Caida Libre *MCAS has entered the chat*

@unassumingaccount395

5 жыл бұрын

*MCAS 2 is now in the works*

@anishskashyap5067

5 жыл бұрын

The width of the engine is same as the width of a 737 fuselage

@_SP64_

4 жыл бұрын

The GE9X is about as big as a 737 fuselage so good luck with that

777-X Really beautiful!! 😍😳😱🤤

The engines are HUGE

The 777-9X looks amazing idk why didn’t they have in the the red and white livery that they had teesed

Beautiful

That car is TINY compared to the plane And the engine oh man

@Lakay7

5 жыл бұрын

That's not a car, that's a full size Van.

@AJ-dx6bn

5 жыл бұрын

Have you seen an A380?

I was just wondering , they will have to include a “wingtips ... un-folded” in the before take off checklist , or something like that .

@nolenhughes2464

5 жыл бұрын

I'd be concerned if they didn't.

Are those the GE9X engines?

@sajith4896

5 жыл бұрын

Yes

@EthanPricco

5 жыл бұрын

Yep

@brettdemauna9994

5 жыл бұрын

Yep.

@futurepilot4372

5 жыл бұрын

E X A C T L Y

@muhammadivan3274

5 жыл бұрын

Well yes, but acctually YES !

Simply the most beautiful aircraft that ever existed

@alabama1413

5 жыл бұрын

Disagree. Concorde is the most beautiful civil aircraft ever designed.

@idaviation

5 жыл бұрын

Nope, Yakovlevs are the best planes on Earth!!!🤣

@hectorzambrano4092

5 жыл бұрын

Wait til you potentially see some fuel efficient 747 replicas in the future (Not tryna hate though)

Is Nice to see that the Boeing 777X is being tested out on this Video where watching now.

Jesus those engines are huge. I genuinely hope and pray they don't kill anyone.

It's beautiful...

The dark blue color on the lower part of plane fits it really well

My goodness that is cool.

Wow, what a giant! Really exciting!

Real beauty!

You could fit 5 of those vans driving beside it inside one engine, it's so big. The Ge9x engine is actually wider then a 737 fuselage.

Good to see they're testing the plane. Hopefully no surprises out of this one.

The landing gear is taller than the oldest version??

Oh my god so good looking

Man, this thing makes the 747 look normal size.

Anyone who makes a comment about the MCAS crashing the plane doesn't know about it. Do some research about it first. And Airbus congratulated Boeing on 100 years. Both companies say it's good to have competition makes better planes.

@riot2136

5 жыл бұрын

307 Wyoming 4F competition* not compilation bro lol

@wyomingadventures

5 жыл бұрын

@@riot2136 thank you! 😉

Can't wait to fly a PMDG 777X in FS2020 in about 4 years

@pilerks1

5 жыл бұрын

Itll be sooner than that. Just be ready to pay 100-150

@joelfernandes23

5 жыл бұрын

@@pilerks1 longer than thatmaybe

@theadventureinsider

5 жыл бұрын

Can't wait to fly on one IRL

@hectorzambrano4092

5 жыл бұрын

@@pilerks1 If it's that expensive, I'll just stick with FS2004 or FSX cuz it's free nowadays, otherwise I'll build FS2020 myself cuz earning cash takes way too much time :(

Okay that’s a beautiful bird 🦅

@KING 5 is it alright if I use this video on my instagram? If so, is there an account I can credit you at?

I like this one

0:15 just pause at the head on view. WOW. You could almost fit an entire 737 fuselage through one of those engines!!!

@zackz2006

5 жыл бұрын

ge 90s could fit a 737

“Lets go Boeing let’s go”

No affects but I hade the wingtip when it’s up I prefer it halfway or all the way down

I’m surprised there aren’t any chevrons on the engine to reduce noise

@kylenavarro1600

5 жыл бұрын

There were originally going to be chevrons. But they were removed from the design because they slightly increase drag and the designers found a way to reduce noise with some kind of addition to the engine cowling. Noise insulation or something.

What is that ball on a string hanging from the tail?

Hello, quick question here I am curious about the wing tip fold, is it because the 777 has a much bigger wingspan? Can somebody explain? Anyways, another impressive aircraft from the Boeing Plant.

@EthanPricco

5 жыл бұрын

Ian Garrett the Boeing 777X has a larger wingspan than the previous 777 models. Having a larger wingspan means that the plane burns less fuel because larger wingspan=more lift being generated. But due to the larger wingspan, Boeing decided to create the folding wingtips because the folding wingtips would shorten the wingspan on the plane to about the same length of the wingspans of other 777 models. This would allow the 777X to fit into any gate at an airport that a normal 777 can already fit into. This means that many airports across the world wouldn’t have to redesign their gates in order to allow the 777X to fit. I hope this helped.

@JundaComputersGmbH

5 жыл бұрын

Ian Garrett It's about ICAO category for airport terminals size of the aerodrome gates to accommodate which types of aircraft Category A (15 meter wingspan limit) Category B (24 meter wingspan limit) Category C (36 meter wingspan limit) Category D (52 meter wingspan limit) Category E (65 meter wingspan limit) Category F (80 meter wingspan limit) Category C is for A220, A320, 717, 727, 737 Category D is for A300, A310, DC-10, MD-11, 757, 767, L-1011 Tristar Category E is for A330, A340, A350, 777, 787, 747-100,200,300,400 Category F is for A380, 747-8 Boeing was kind of stupid in making the 757 with 38 meter wingspan, when the maximum limit under category D is 52m, 757 wasted 14 meter wingspan which could have been about 10% better fuel efficiency, same with 767 at 47 meter wingspan, wasted 5 meters, same with old 737 Classic with 28 meter wingspan, wasted 6 meters and old 747-100,200 had 60 meter wingspan which wasted 5 meters. The reason the Airbus A330 was much more fuel efficient than 767 was because A330 had 60 meter wingspan while 767 had 47, extra 13 meter wingspan made A330 much more fuel efficient and better range than 767 during high altitude cruise. Imagine if the MD-11 had 64.9 meter wings instead of 52 meter wingspan the MD-11 would have been much more fuel efficient and longer range that the MD-11 program would have been a commercial success instead having poor sales of only 200 planes sold out MD-11 could have sold 500+ units So the 777X with foldable wingtips and extra 7 meter wingspan makes the plane more fuel efficient during high altitude cruise and when plane lands the wingtip folds so it still fit under category E Airbus was also thinking of foldable wingtips on new versions of the A380, extending wingspan from 79.8 meter to 95 meter, extra 15 meter wingspan would make A380 10% more fuel efficient and greatly addresses its biggest weakness of poor fuel efficiency, and it will also be available to retrofit existing A380's to give current operators much improved range and efficiency and help Lufthansa, Air France and Qatar Airways into keeping their A380's instead of phasing them out early due to poor fuel efficiency, since 10% better fuel efficient makes the difference between loss or a profit for the A380, and help keep A380's flying for many years to come

@THYB737

5 жыл бұрын

@@EthanPricco fuel efficiency has nothing to do with the amount of lift being produced by a wing.

@hempelcx

5 жыл бұрын

Boeing's stated reason for the extended wing tips *is* fuel efficiency. Whether that's specifically due to more lift or if it relates more to pushing vortices further from the airframe I don't know, but overall it is to improve fuel efficiency.

@pilerks1

5 жыл бұрын

@@THYB737 well yes and no. More lift means less work for the engines, but theres more drag which means more work for the engines. Theres a median for the best efficiency

Look at all of those 737 max planes just sitting there.

Are those GE9x be without those serrated Chevrons?

All those 737s in the background, I bet they'll be glad when they can deliver them.

@apieceofdirt4681

5 жыл бұрын

I know right. You know they’ve GOT to be freakin out to put it mildly. I hope BOEING does the right thing if they are indeed responsible for those 2 MAX plane crashes because of poor software design. I think they will. Safety for the consumer should ALWAYS be paramount.

@apieceofdirt4681

5 жыл бұрын

Curtis Whyte Yeah it will for sure but they’ll get it back if they don’t do anything dumb like profits over safety.

Massive engines

The engine is larger than the cabin?

Oh she’s darling 🥰🥰🥰🥰

What is flying next to it? The shot that ends at 0:55 is cropped to hide it.

The Mammoth of the Sky 💪💪

0:06 Top Gun nostalgia

Avião lindo

On a lot of test flights l’ve seen there is something tied to the tail. Does anybody know what it is for? It must be some sort of sensor. You can see it at 0:18 and 1:00 .

@alexrichards1353

5 жыл бұрын

@Ken Taylor at a guess, i’d say it’s either a camera or a sensor package to measure airflow in the wake

When will be it’s files test flight?

Are those folding wing tips just for manoeuvring purposes or are they going to be used as winglets in flight also?

@destruct1214

5 жыл бұрын

Ground use only. The wings of the 777x are so large that they needed the folding wing tips so that the plane could fly to the same destinations as the 777 without needing airport modifications.

@riot2136

5 жыл бұрын

Wilbur Finnigan stop acting like such a smartass dude, you’ve gone on other comments calling people stupid when they were right.

I am always being fan

Like yo! Thats a van!! 2 of them can fit in that engine! Holly molly!

Engines are as big as the fuselage..Wonder if they come matched ??

@BrownWolverine

5 жыл бұрын

I read that those engines are roughly the circumference of a 737 fuselage.

Wow the GE9x makes the GE90 look small!

@mr-rio2819

5 жыл бұрын

@nightstalker Are you sure the GE9x is supposed to be the largest jet engine in the world.

@rickybrown5817

5 жыл бұрын

Me-rio is not small ge90 are largest engine 22 fan blade the Ge9x only 16 fan blade not many

@Real_ghostboi

5 жыл бұрын

@@rickybrown5817 The GE9X engines are bigger than the GE90s. The amount of fan blades has nothing to do with the overall size of the engine itself.

Such a beautiful airplane, I really hope Boeing get there act together

Cool

So beautiful

I love the wings of the plane, hope there is no MCAS software installed on this plane.

@crashcast_e6339

5 жыл бұрын

MCAS is a software limited to the 737MAX due to the installation of bigger engines that had to be mounted higher up on the wing.

@Racko.

5 жыл бұрын

People still Don't understand what MCAS even is

@PortlandAviation

5 жыл бұрын

@@Racko. I assume you mean still *don't* understand lol

@charlesjones6487

5 жыл бұрын

Its no use, Its clear that 99% of the people commenting on here don't know crap about airliners or how they work. They say things like I hope they don't put MCAS on it" and most don't know any more than what they here in the media which is usually inaccurate in the first place. The truth of the matter is that ALL modern airliners have MCAS in some form or another. It may not be called MCAS but it is still some form of flight management computer. On any fly by wire aircraft, what do you think converts the pilots commands to hydraulic muscle to operate the control surfaces? Computers! They also monitor the inputs and over ride them to keep the airplane in a protected mode of operation. This is especially true on Airbus fly by wire systems.The issue with the max is not the MCAS itself, but how it was implemented.

@Racko.

5 жыл бұрын

@@PortlandAviation Yea lmao

When will it make it's first flight?

@riot2136

5 жыл бұрын

Nolan The dab king hopefully within the next 4 months

What will happen if the wing tip gets ripped off mid flight

@johnhinson6958

5 жыл бұрын

Hopefully

01:03 LOT - Polish airlines

Huge engines. Folding wings and all

Would ya look at the girth of those engines 😍😍😂

Hope this can spark Boeing's big comeback, enough to get momentum for new midsize and smaller aircrafts.

Where is the chevrons?

Wonder how many aviation "experts" are comparing this to the 737 MAX.

@markduglaus5623

5 жыл бұрын

its funny, both are not related in anything

@damonreynolds6775

5 жыл бұрын

You just did

@38911bytefree

5 жыл бұрын

The 777 is a 90s development, made with the last techology and with far more room to accomodate any update. Same as A320 A330 A340 familiy. In fact, the 777 is most modern !!!. Surely they did a superb job on the 777x.

@nolenhughes2464

5 жыл бұрын

Approximately zero experts and many fools.

@saibattu3663

5 жыл бұрын

@@damonreynolds6775 good point, lol.

I love

I really hope this plane doesn’t have any problems when it starts flying

@wyomingadventures

5 жыл бұрын

Don't be a Debbie Downer

Boeing will be great again... I love Boeing

Will this be similar to the 787-9 in any way? Also, next to the 747, it’s the largest aircraft built by Boeing. It can be called “mini jumbo” for sure

@jeremysaban7529

5 жыл бұрын

What do you mean similar to the 787-9? Similar in what?

Hopefully the 737 MAX designers didn't tainted the design of the 777X

@RM-iu9bw

5 жыл бұрын

Weren't the 737 max issues software based? If so, design has nothing to do with it

@UbuhEats

5 жыл бұрын

@@RM-iu9bw The software was introduced because they cut corners in the design process. Basically the problem was due to software brought about by design.

@gledatelj1979

5 жыл бұрын

@@UbuhEats The problem is a 50 year airplane design and new engine. It's too much of a difference.The software is just a patch, not a feature.

@UbuhEats

5 жыл бұрын

@@gledatelj1979 the software has a bug where it forces the nose down when it doesn't need to.

@gledatelj1979

5 жыл бұрын

@@UbuhEats The software is covering up for something else

That GE9X is so massive...its visible from space. An alien watching will say "now we know how these lowly hoomans travel in hi speed..."

@camilmoujaber4813

5 жыл бұрын

lol

The 2nd biggest Boeing plane is the 777X, it's also the 2nd best Boeing plane

Engines are the same as other 777 .unless info i read was incorrect. Also said the power setting will be increased to acomadate the extra weight.

@riot2136

5 жыл бұрын

harry doherty no these energies are different, these engines are called GE9X, they are much bigger. On older 777’s they are the GE90’s

Sólo espero que este nuevo avión no tenga ningún percance como el 737-8MAX. si ocurre eso, sería el quiebre de una de las empresas más poderosas del mundo.

Hope nothing goes wrong..

Engines are as wide as a Boeing 737 fuselage.

What if the pilots forgot to extend the wingtips when taking off?

@shhaabu

5 жыл бұрын

Im sure the EFIS and announciator panel will advise the pilot prior take off

I saw there are many Max in there...

What a Goliath

Turkish 787 spotted! At 0:07!

@heyitsvos

5 жыл бұрын

Pradeep Shetty been waiting for it. I think supposed to receive in July

Still wished the engines had chevrons, I thought it was becoming the Boeing signature, shame