Enjoy our channel? Please SUBCRIBE, LIKE & SHARE. Thank you! For 750 AVIATION FILMS visit our DOWNLOAD STORE shop.justplanes.com/

@pesetamaya3509

3 жыл бұрын

Boys make sure you checked that 737 everyday we don't want another incident from Indonesia so the back wing that stands in the middle that thing gets stuck and it shoots to the right and I'll pull you down so be careful we always pray for you guys

Personally, I think the best thing about this video was the decision to concentrate on the PFD till very nearly the end so that we can appreciate what the pilots were seeing in taking the decisions they did and monitoring their outcomes. We've missed just how dramatic the low visibility was outside, no doubt, but under the circumstances the PFD was, in my opinion, far more important. Good call!!

@insomnia20422

Жыл бұрын

I mean low visibility is just you see everything grey when you look outside. Its nothing really special lol.

@lb_reflections

Жыл бұрын

@@insomnia20422 😆 You have a point too, yes.....

Oldie but goodie 😊 CAT II approach right down to 50' and a go around. Don't see this everyday. FO was so chill, even explaining what's happening during the missed.

This is one of the best videos. Good camerawork and explanations of the captain and copilot

Runway visual: 20 ft above the runway???????? Amazing!

Absolutely amazing video wonderful pilots. ..loved the view of the clouds ..brilliant filming thanks so much love an god bless x

More like this please, piloting with a situation

Excellent video and great information provided by the flight crew, fantastic to watch. 👏👏 Hell you could hardly see the follow-me vehicle, great landing👌👌

Yeah....I'm enjoying

Awesome video!!

Absolutely awesome video and this shows how poor the visibility was and how the crew dealt with this situation and completed an auto land. Great vid.

Amazing. Absolutely amazing.

great job, and great explication, thank you ein richtig schön gute Morgen!

Excellent discussion about auto land!

Fog landing videos are always so cool. It makes me anxious doing it in something like X-Plane, I can't imagine doing it in real life. Autoland still weirds me out to use.

Good to see the paper charts once again. Haven’t seen them in such a long time. Really takes you back quite a while.

JP......Hello! Love watching your trip.....Aviation is always amazing JP! Fantastic filming! Thanks for posting.....stay safe! See you tomorrow;) Greetings......Betsy.

@justplanes

3 жыл бұрын

Thanks very much Betsy, hope all is well!

Amazing technology! Very professional crew. Take care, Be safe.

Beautiful Autoland!

Nice video!

Good job Crew !

Love this movie my favorite DVD at home 😍

Beautiful :)

superb video,,showing displays for most of video gives you a better understanding

↻ great vid 2star

It's like floating on top of amazing clouds with a beautiful sunset ahead of you. I enjoy listening to and watching these pilots as they control this amazing aircraft. Just to see how things happen is amazing because you learn about it. Awesome landing that sounds amazing by these great pilots. Very very foggy, but these pilots did an amazing job. Awesome video, I love it.

♐ great vid 4star

WOW!What a quick climb.

Venice - - WHOA - - that is SOME fog !!!

➶ great video 7star

Just planes de très belle vidéo

Much appreciated video. Thanks to the crew. Few differences in SOP than what I am used to. CRMBBB was great approach set up procedures.

Outstanding 👌🇺🇸

Very Nice

Good Job

♐ great vid 1star

Fabtastic!

⇈ great vid 9star

True professionals make it look so easy.

Waiting

Looks like Fresno, CA, (KFAT), has a 3 month fog season

Hot approach? As in fast? One should be on speed and fully configured by the FAF?

This is one of the most amazing videos of the cockpit I have seen. To suddenly see the runway infront of you just as the plane is landing is quite shocking. I did not know that any plane had the ability to land in fog like that on auto pilot. As the pilot, I would find that extremely unnerving.

@dhakaboy1

2 жыл бұрын

Category III Zero-Zero visibility landing have been used since the late 60's and early 1970's !

@valicourt

2 жыл бұрын

The fail operational version of the 737 has even lower minimums. They don’t have a decision height at all in many cases and just need 75 metres.

wow, nice landing with such low vis.

An old one I guess? ;-) Germania on the frequency 👍🏻

⇪ thanks 2star

Plane: Marco! Airport: Polo!

@riadriad1412

3 жыл бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂

So powerful. 2:12 watching dis from here with my rock playlist crancked to 11 and this on mute. Metallica, Delta Parole, ACDC etc. LIT LIT LIT!

did they use auto speedbrakes ? or was it a manual speedbrake deploy ?

Good job! God bless you and have a great day.!🤗👠🤠

Why do you call it a HOT approach? HOT usually means an unstable either high or fast, this approach was neither. Excellent video thanks, training question; is it logical to do doing the after landing procedures whilst coming off a runway in LVO conditions? PMs primary role, in this situation, is monitoring and to make sure that the Capt doesn't taxi on to the grass or down the wrong taxiway or it an obstacle.

I LIKE how the german co-pilot trys his best to talk english

Great and informative. However, is this cat 2 or cat 3?

the closed captions interpretations like GHWBush on The JFK Dallas deep gov Job!

Love AP LANDINGS

Thank you for the video. Why not AUTOland on the first approach, if the capability existed? Would save fuel and time?

@cfg003

3 жыл бұрын

They were not allowed to Autoland since the minimum RVR was not met. Even with an Autoland you need a minimum RVR.

@buckbuchanan5849

3 жыл бұрын

@@cfg003 Thank you

@KuostA

3 жыл бұрын

@@cfg003 what does RVR mean?

@cfg003

3 жыл бұрын

@@KuostA it means Runway Visual Range. Its the distance you are able to see horizontally from the cockpit to the last visible runway light.

By the way, the fail operational version of this aircraft has even lower minimums. 75 metres in most cases.

At 4:50, If you really pay attention to 737 cockpit, you can spot the wearing down areas.

I do that all the time in my Piper Archer- what's the big deal?

why they do not use autoland?

Can anyone tell me why the automatic landing isnt the default procedure for airports that offer it?

@tomstravels520

Жыл бұрын

Pilots will loose their skills

👍👍👍

Wow that is foggy, have to make sure they don’t see another aircraft when taxing

A "hot approach" I do not recall that procedure in my 30 plus years of flying, 19 of the in the 7-3. LOL, I wonder what the check list says. "Hot Approach Checklist" don't recall that one.

@domc327

3 жыл бұрын

These days the kids call it a "spicy approach" get with the times old man

Always love these vids but would be great to see more outside the cockpit views rather than mostly instrument panel,especially on approach 8)

@larsw8776

3 жыл бұрын

Since it was a really foggy approach, filming the panel was the best decision.

@s1nb4d59

3 жыл бұрын

@@larsw8776 yeah i understand,just would have been cool to see the runway appear out of the mist,not that the instrument panel isn't interesting to watch 8)

@justplanes

3 жыл бұрын

Nothing to see out the cockpit, total fog... so you would have seen whiteness... and now you got to see the important instruments...

That was some thick fog.

The 737 is another thumbnail for another video. How u all not know that already

9:00 The described system is called fail-operational instead of fail-passive!

Missed approach in a 737 in low visibility scares me. Remember Flydubai 981?

@kallek5655

3 жыл бұрын

Sure, and they almost repeated their crash last year. But Armavia also had a similar crash with an A320. In the end, some basic piloting skills must simply be available. Also, in this video it was a fully automatic go-around.

Scary shit brah

But in the 787 Dreamliner doesnt work

I would leave the autopilot on as long as possible on rollout just in case your vis deteriorates .this was always a debrief item working as a check airman.

@joerch96

Жыл бұрын

The B 737 doesn't have an automatic rollout mode! The Pilot has to take over lateral control after touch down.

@tamefroggy

Жыл бұрын

@@joerch96 It does! only on CAT3B cetified ILS sytems like any other aircraft

@Hk-uw8my

Жыл бұрын

No you can do this. As we could see on the fma there was no rollout feature. The Autopilots must be disconnected immediately after touchdown.

@Hk-uw8my

Жыл бұрын

​@@tamefroggy no, most 737s just like the one you see in the video are fitted with a fail passive autopilot system, the autopilot cannot control the rudder. Only fail op 737s with a rudder channel have the ability to track the centerline after touchdown by relying on rudder, nose wheel steering and main gear tracking. And it can work even with a cat I ILS.

Boeing 737-700 ?? I see the Vref is very low just 132 knots

When Autoland system flares better then "buttery landing" sh*t instagram F/O's

Jeez the fog was so thick you could not really make out the sides of the runway!!

I even was being scared to watch this video when the airplane was approaching the runway. Pilots need to have steel balls.

@vladimirfromukraine419

3 жыл бұрын

@@jamescollier3 500' Are you alive?

How can they choose to autoland if the minimums are 50' RA??

@fbw_pilot

3 жыл бұрын

Only CAT IIIC don't have any minimum. CAT II and CAT III always have minimum.

@MartinNeep

3 жыл бұрын

The 737 in this video has a fail passive autoflight system, therefore they are limited to a CAT IIIA approach. CAT IIIA has a DH of not less than 50ft and reported touchdown RVR not less than 200m.

👍👍 #

And there a those people that think pilots aren't needed anymore. Weather like that, without a human pilot there, I wouldn't step on a plane.

Is 132kts typical for landing? I was under the impression that it was typically 140kts at touch down.

@AkiraAkiyama

3 жыл бұрын

Actually 737 has a higher landing speed if they use flap 30 compared to the other Boeing planes. But flap 40 can be used for shorter runways or during bad weathers/visibility. So they decided to use flap 40 and which gives them a slower speed for landing. Plus they were not heavy so 131kt is an appropriate speed for landing. If they are basically empty, the speed can drop down to 125kt or so.

@JohnnyRawks

3 жыл бұрын

@@AkiraAkiyama Thanks!

Is it was CATIII or CATII landing?

@md1400cs

3 жыл бұрын

that was a CAT III -- CAT II allows for visual references at DH usually approx 200' but not less than 100' as well as at least 1,200' for RVR (runway visual range) - CAT III does not (DH 50' RVR 700') . Pilots need to be trained for using either, aircraft needs the equipment as well as the runway ILS tech CAT installed. I've done a lot of CAT IIs when I was working in B737-200s - retired now -- CAT IIIs are another story. No CATIIIs - a bit scarier --- MJD

how you Programm Auto Landing

@Warka400

3 жыл бұрын

Put the ILS frequency in both NAV-Receivers and when on final activate the second autopilot (CMD A and CMD B). Now you have told the plane to do an autoland.

Ich hoffe nur, dass der eingestellte Luftdruck von 1013 HP (normalerweise der Standard Luftdruck ab 5 oder 6 Tausend Fuß) auch der aktuelle war .....

@kallek5655

3 жыл бұрын

Bei 7:18 sagt der Controller, dass das QNH 1013 ist, passt :)

Old times... when charts was on a paper.

Approaching minimums...50...10...

What's a hot approach?

@justplanes

3 жыл бұрын

That’s how the pilot called it and explained it.

Thats how you do that folks.

@justplanes

2 жыл бұрын

very true

"Alles gesehen" .....bis auf die Landebahn ...

TUIFly ex Hapag Lloyd.

Vis so low they needed an escort car to get off the runway.

Should've started filming the outside earlier, now the shot of the landing is way too bright. Can't really appreciate the low vis conditions.

Not a HOT approach. Cat 3 autopilot landing....

Please just post the video, enough with these premieres already, thanks

@suspicionofdeceit

3 жыл бұрын

Fancy BobbyBob Amen, not sure why channels are doing this, very annoying.

@brocanova

3 жыл бұрын

@@suspicionofdeceit Kind of posh, like baiting

@MusicAnirban

3 жыл бұрын

Agreed, its a horrible feature - premiering!! Hate it.

@danmcguire7728

3 жыл бұрын

It's what pays the bills, making money.

@justplanes

3 жыл бұрын

Our videos do better if we premiere them so obviously that’s what any creator on you tube would want however if you would give me so valid reasons I’d be happy to take them into consideration. Keep in mind some of our viewers enjoy being able to communicate with others during these premieres and have gotten used to this feature. Another good feature is you can see what’s coming up ans put a reminder if you wanna catch it but happy to hear what you dislike...

bloody youtube ads every couple of minutes

@justplanes

3 жыл бұрын

You can download the complete 3 hour film for $15 with no ads ;)

@kallek5655

3 жыл бұрын

Using the uBlock Origin addon here. Haven't seen youtube ads in ages :)

@jensaugust743

2 жыл бұрын

​@@kallek5655 havent paid a creator for their hard work in ages* There, fixed your comment

@kallek5655

2 жыл бұрын

​@@jensaugust743 Fixed? Lol, you didn't fix anything, as my comment wasn't wrong in the first place, you just added your own.

I eager to see outside the cockpit when they perform go around first time. How the actual condition looks like from above. And also the landing.

Why does tower say several RVR readings? Do they correspond to different runways?

@stefanzivkovic99

3 жыл бұрын

For aircraft to autoland, runways must have special equipment for measuring visibility. RVR stands for runway visual range. Autoland runways must have 3 separate visibility measuring instruments corresponding to thirds of the runway. When the controller says 175/175/175, those are readings from 3 separate visibility measuring machines at the beginning/middle/end of the runway. Hope this explains it somewhat :)

@Marcoli5

3 жыл бұрын

@@stefanzivkovic99 Thank you! Do the three of them have to be above the minimum rvr required to attempt the approach? Or with the TDZ RVR it is enough?

@kallek5655

3 жыл бұрын

@@Marcoli5 Only the relevant ones, which are the ones where you expect to be above 60kts. Let's say you approach a 3000m runway and your required landing distance is 1500m, then you can disregard the end zone RVR as it's not relevant for your landing, but the first two have to be taken into account.

He didn't have 200' visibility

4.6 on the fuel? Ouch.

@kallek5655

3 жыл бұрын

Why? They probably took a bit more to be able to hold for some time as low vis was forcast, plus they might have had to choose a more distant alternate due to weather conditions.

@a3300000

3 жыл бұрын

@@kallek5655 4.6 isn’t much fuel in those conditions.

@kallek5655

3 жыл бұрын

@@a3300000 Maybe we should agree on the unit first. This one's using the metric system, therefore having 4.6 tons in its tanks, which equals about 10140lbs.

@a3300000

3 жыл бұрын

@@kallek5655 I see.

Missed on the first approach...5400lbs of fuel...you go hold? Glad the weather improved.....

@RomeoJulietCharlie

3 жыл бұрын

5400kg. This is in Europe.

That gear was brought up too quick for a correct go around procedure Arnt you suppose to retract flaps get to a safe altitude before retracting landing gear?

@kallek5655

3 жыл бұрын

No. The only parameter you need is a positive rate of climb, just like on take-off. Only when you achieve a safe altitude you can accelerate and retract the flaps further (they're set to 15 for a dual engine go-around upon initiation of the go-around).