You explain that very well. You're a good teacher. So many people aren't who put up these videos.

Hi, just wondering why black didn't play BXg5 @4：22. Thank you so much!

@user-ii6xg1sj2k

16 күн бұрын

...because of Nd5...?!

7:00 when people consider good pieces they only think about attacking potential and disregard defending potential. That dark square bishop is a good piece. It both protects the king and the e5 pawn. Without it the king starts to feel naked.

Thanks for sharing your talents and insights in a straightforward way.

Nice video. Thanks. Well explained.

Sir, I got to this video reccomended by YT. Your way to explain is top notch, you gain a new Sub here 🤝.

Excellent commentary and excellent COMMENTS from your viewers!!😇

Certainly an impressive game and I struggle to apply this kind of skill to make small improvements against players that don’t seem to be making any mistakes

so well explained thank you .... swapping one advantage for another ... the KEY !!!

This channel slept on

Mr Dawg - Thoroughly enjoyed your explanation of this Fischer-Unzicker game, that is I n such a clear and simple manner,. A lot clearer than what was his 60 Memorable game on the same.

I can imagine Fischer thinking 20-30 moves before black resigns thinking to himself, black is completely dead lost!!

@bowlingmaster168

8 ай бұрын

yall creating this logic when you don't really apply it as a beginner

@Wally780

8 ай бұрын

⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠@@bowlingmaster168actually it more if a masters thinking logic about 2300-2400 elo rating players sometimes think like this in important games

@Wallyworld30

5 ай бұрын

Fischer said himself he usually only looked 3 or 4 moves in advance unless it was a common line where he forced opponents moves then up to 20 moves.

@keaton718

2 ай бұрын

@@Wallyworld30 Pathetic. Stockfish effectively looks at the whole possible game ahead with each and every move.

Am I missing something? Why not ..Bxg5 at 4:25?

@garys5175

6 ай бұрын

If black takes on g5, white will play his knight to d5 threatening the queen, which leads to white winning the exchange.

@siraf1234

6 ай бұрын

Bxg5 Nd5! Bxd5 Bxg5 and black is positionally busted and losing material if he doesn't find f6 Bxf6 Rd6

@The3rdTower

4 ай бұрын

The question is, why did this video fail to analyse it? The Stockfish chess engine says it is equal even if after Bxg5. This was a critical position and he should have given analysis.

Very good content. Can I suggest you to put accuracy of the players at the end of the video. 💪

@markiyanhapyak349

7 ай бұрын

What's that?

Thank you

Very good lesson and the more deeply you follow it the better your game. Mention the name Chigorin in your videos and I'll always watch them at least twice. Have you done Chigorin vs Lasker? The variation in this video is a great strategy. Ruy Lopez, Closed, Chigorin Defense.

Bobby Fischer annotated this game himself in My 60 Memorable Games .

Good pace

Great game 🎯

Enjoyed the video. Ignore these jerks in the comments. What the hell lol

I like your channel. Maybe it's because I'm about one generation underneath you and learned from my superiors at the time. Fischer is my idol even though he is a generation above me. I always played his favorite openings with the White or Black pieces and this is why I favor your channel. The only difference is that I try to go into more Modern Italian traps & lines as White...but I often play blitz games, so this may be my reason. I'm not sure what I would play in 10-30min games...perhaps I should look into the Ruy more. It has been since my scholastic days since I've played long games

Fischer the GOAT ❤

My brain is fried lol

Amazing……!!

Why bishop didn't take G7 pawn?

Why black didn't capture a poun with bishop in G5 on 4'25min?

g5 plundered a pawn and now one sees it ;-)

Would love to have seen Fischer vs Carlson.

@keaton718

2 ай бұрын

If you like to see a grown man cry, sure.

@bobbylenz3594

2 ай бұрын

@keaton718 not sure who would cry. They are both great.

@keaton718

2 ай бұрын

@@bobbylenz3594 Bobby is great. But he'd cry. And he'd be bugging, convinced he is cheating, unless he had the opportunity beforehand to research him and how computer training works. Bobby would be convinced that if it weren't for computer training in youth that Magnus would be worse, and so Bobby would refuse to play chess ever again, except maybe a rematch of someone who is worse than him.

The way Karpov crushed Unzicker with his Ruy Lopez was more impressive.

4:23 g5 Can the black Bishop capture this pawn after it advances? Restore my FishFaith.

@edwardwalsh4454

3 ай бұрын

Because the Knight is unstoppable in route to the f6 SQUARE as the Q supports the Knight's advance!

i'mma try try this on my homies tomorrow

I don't think spanish is the most safe way to play. Same with some other defensive strategy's. Pirc for example. If you know every move by memory ok you can play well. But why would you try to hold on with the back to the ropes to reach an end game with equal changes? I think Italian or Kings Gambit are more easy to play for white.

By putting together all of his chess knowledge, Bobby learned to slowly increase his advantage. Unfortunately, he also went insane. Sad story.😢

@MrMorlaf

6 ай бұрын

either he went insane or his super high I.Q. was allowing him to see things a bit clearer that the rest of us "sane" ppl? ;-)

@bobbylenz3594

5 ай бұрын

He never went insane. The man spoke the truth and exposed the hypocrisy of our elected leaders. He had courage. Unfortunately, western media is heavily biased to a scripted narrative.

@Wallyworld30

5 ай бұрын

@@MrMorlaf If you think he went super high IQ instead of crazy you also have lost your mind.

Unzicker was a legened!

Another good video. But in this day of advanced computer/engine analysis, "probably a mistake" (and other uncertain phrases like that) sounds rather weak.

4:21 what happens if he simply takes g5?

@norzangrabgye8917

6 ай бұрын

Then white has Nd5 . 1.if Bxd5 Bxg5 2.if Bxc1 NF6+ 3.Be7 Nxe7+ followed by Qf6 Bh6 white wins material.

@victor6010

6 ай бұрын

@@norzangrabgye8917 2.Bxc1 NF6 check, kingh8 Nxe8? if takes the knight you take the bishop ok... but if he saves bishop with Bg5, knight is trapped? and then black gets 2 pieces for the rook no? EDIT: Oh knight can go back to f6 actually right? so it's not trapped... hmmm damn, I would take that pawn and lose in every variant lol thanks gg

he single greatest strategy to beat almost anyone is to actually be Bobby Fischer.

You mentioned building the position with little DETAILS; then Fischer later plays P-g5 unprotected; AND, YOU MAKE NO MENTION ABOUT THE COMBINATIONS OF THE SACRIFICE! What reason do you have for giving an inexperienced player for that move to be justified; which, you should have talked about!

@chessdawg

7 ай бұрын

Yeah, I should have pointed that out. It isn't actually a bad move, it just isn't as strong as Nc4 played in the game. White does get a very strong attack if black takes the pawn though. One line after Bg5 is: 21.Nd5 Bc1 22. Nf6+ Kh8 23.Rac1 Rf8 24. Qg3(attacking e5) Qc7 25. Qg5 (threatening Qh6-h7mate) white has at least a draw, but can play for more with f4 incoming. But overall, Bg5 is a playable move, just riskier for black.

@SpaceCadet4Jesus

6 ай бұрын

Inexperienced players need more board experience, not told about combinations. Who can keep combinations in mind and only play the right one in game? Learn from watching the game and quit getting distracted by combinations that the GM did not play.

@davidabrams7784

3 ай бұрын

Yes, that question is the proverbial elephant in the room. But Fischer, in his 60 Memorable Games, was silent on that move as well.

😀

very well done, I am subscribing, you are a very good teacher. May Jesus bless you and your family. You are a prayer answered. I want to reach elo 2000, your video will I believe allow me to climb. Thanks. 😎😎😎

Nothing like having mid-roll video ads every 3 or 4 minutes. Really makes watching your videos more enjoyable! It's interesting that agadmator has 1.3 million subscribers and has NEVER placed mid-roll video ads in his videos.

@beirutleb1376

8 ай бұрын

😂🤣🤣🤣

@lefthandedfork3337

8 ай бұрын

He’s a small growing channel, I don’t mind the ads I appreciate his content he deserves to reap the rewards from his efforts.

@michaeltellurian825

8 ай бұрын

@@lefthandedfork3337Yeah, I do too. But that's not how you grow your channel, by annoying the viewer.

@noapology88

8 ай бұрын

What ads?

@carlosmarquez9375

8 ай бұрын

There's no ads

It's very irritating that he completely ignores key tactical issues. For example, when white played 33.Be1, there was no discussion of the fact that white apparently just hung a pawn. I the pace of the video, it had to see the critical lines in 5 sec. It is clear that after 33...Qxe4 34.Bf3 Qf4 35.Qxf4 exf4 36.Bc6 black cannot play 36...Rd8 because of the deadly pin after 37.Rd1, which will cost black a piece. But after 36...Re7 primitive 37.Ra7?? doesn't work for 37...Re1+ unpinning the Knight with a decisive advantage of black: 38.Kh2 Ne5 39.Bxb5 (39.Bf3 is a bit better but insufficient) 39...Ng4+ 40.Kh3 Nxf2+ 41.Kh4 h6 and the white King is hopelessly caught in a mating net. Also 36...Re7 37.Bxb5(?!) Nf6 is nothing special for white. But white still has the winning pin here: 36...Re7 37.Ra8+! (forcing the King to go to the 7th rank underpin) 37...Kg7 38.Ra7 with the win of the piece. It's easy to see, but please give the viewer of the video time to digest these subtleties of the position. There were many other examples in the game. In summary, it there is an apparent strong move for one of the players, spend a few seconds pointing out why the move is bad.

What is best chess game; with draw ending. Because I recently find that most chess game ended with draw. If both sides play perfectly accurate. ❓❔⁉️ ✋🖐👍

Yo Dawg

Like

First 😊

This video was mislabeled to death! It didn’t show any SINGLE strategy from Fischer…it just showed a REALLY GOOD GAME! CLICKBAIT!!!

@SpaceCadet4Jesus

6 ай бұрын

He said it a couple times. Building your position move by move into a structure from which you can springboard into an attack into weaknesses in your opponents position. Build a structure.

99% of these kind of videos is pure blabber, the valuable 1% is glossed over in 2 seconds. We all know how the pieces move. We need to drill down on the critical moves. I'm exaggerating to make a point.

Thank you