The Bill2 became the NLAW. Better upgrade, better name.

@intrametaarchi1015

2 жыл бұрын

New law, or No law

@ArmUkraine

3 ай бұрын

Bill would have been better ngl

This was an ad!?!?!!?! LMAO. Where can I buy one? Lol.

The best moment with those weapons is when you have shot, and you must not carry it around anymore.

NLAW uses same warhead as BILL2,and we have seen how effective it has been in Ukraine

wow 40mm... such a tiny little warhead but yet it can destroy a tank

Wow lol this is one of the best live fire demonstration's ever.

Terrifyingly beautiful, thank you mr munroe

My Goodness , What powerful weapon , I Love it .

I like the happy jingle at the very end....

Good work sveden !

I will have to get myself one of those, for road rage incidents.

Excellent Video #educational #intriguing #awesome

SAAB is Swedish aerospace and defense company, cars are being produced by its Automobile division 

@GraemeSPa ABBA is the most terrifying weapon of all, a weapon of terror. It's designed to completely demoralize the enemy, so that other weapons systems may not be needed.

Probably magnetic sensing (amongst other neat tricks).. been used since WW2.

one word, Damn....

@iviolin6211

3 жыл бұрын

BUY THIS FOR PET RUSSIAN!!! WHERE IS PET RUSSIAN!? XD

outstanding product.

Unbelievably crazy weapon !!

THIS IS SOOOO GOOOOOD😭😭😭😭

After range to target is found by laser Arming Bill 2 to detonate, say 4 metres further than distance of laser to target reading would cause it to explode over middle of tank Having a variable setting of when to detonate would satisfy most scenario's i.e, set 2 metres further then laser range & it would explode in centre of room This is how the shell from the XM 25 gun works Love the Excalibur artillery shell too If only u could make hockey players as good as ur military goods Kudo's from Canada

If you can't afford the entire weapon system and ammo for an initial purchase, Bofors now offers a point-of-sale system with a credit card scanner built in, only pay for the ammo you use.

@Laotzu.Goldbug

2 жыл бұрын

Will they accept my Ikea credit points

Man that was a very fascinating video and a very impressive device. How does the missile know when it is appropriately over the target to fire the war head.

@oldog2

4 жыл бұрын

they have very tiny mum dad and the kids inside with the kids saying are we there yet every 1/2second until dad just blows up

And both countries were among the most militarized countries in the world during the Cold War.

@Laessker Sweden is no longer neutral or non-aligned since we are in the EU and the Lisbon treaty made the EU a military alliance, among other things...

SAAB should build this level of reliability into their cars!😂

@Scurck

5 жыл бұрын

Saab sold the car making bits of the company to GM in 2000. In 2012 the Saab car company went bankrupt.

@azynkron

5 жыл бұрын

It's not even the same company. The 'muricans ruined the Automobile company when they took it over. SAAB Defence is still going VERY strong.

Awesome.

Ok I want 1. Does Walmart carry these ?

also, i think maybe....they would make the bill2 capable for using as a tank ammunition too.

impressive

I think I played a DOS game to that music!

Did that tank in the first 10 seconds shot a round after the missile exploded?

It did not work when it was fired horizontally at the sloping ERA tile. You get a totally different result when you fire it vertically straight down at the ERA.

@loki76

2 жыл бұрын

That was because of the ERA and it was only one charge used of the "tandem" charge in the Bill 2.. That said, it's designed for top attack. and there you could see it defeated ERA and easily go through 500mm armor.

@prandomable

Жыл бұрын

@@loki76 I was hoping they used MORE steel plates. And see how many plates it actually takes to stop the anti-tank round...I have 2.5 meters thick of AR500 steel plates that I REALLY want to try. However I have no access to anti-tank weapons nor a property to try it :( I am in Texas, USA and looking for this experiment.

@prandomable

Жыл бұрын

@@loki76 should check out this Russian KZreadr. This small sandstone boulder rock ate up 4 RPG rounds like it was nothing. Only cracked the rock from the 4th hit however it didn't seem penetrated completely. He later shot that "same" rock later on his channel and that same rock ate up MORE RPG hits. РПГ - 7 - Застывшая в камне кумулятивная струя

BOFORS has a long history of making lethal weapons. Their guns were mounted on American ships as replacements for the original guns during WW II. As a result, shooting down Japanese dive bombers became a whole lot more effective.

@readytodie7355

6 жыл бұрын

Michael Aitchison Yeah right...

@SMGJohn

6 жыл бұрын

That is hilarious story you developed there, reason why American AA guns were more effective than the Japanese ones were because America mass produced proximity detonating shells. Japan had them too but they were too expensive and came too late to really do anything, America deployed them mass scale on their warships. Basically these shells detonate close to their target so even if you miss an airplane but the shell flies close enough the force it has when detonating will still cause damage. This meant that AA guns no longer had to be pin point accurate and even smaller ships could have devastating effects on airplanes.

@Skroting

2 жыл бұрын

@@SMGJohn its called flak

@Skroting

2 жыл бұрын

and its not proximity, its pressure based explosion that reacts to altitude

@Laotzu.Goldbug

2 жыл бұрын

@@Skroting that is incorrect, it is radar proximity based on a very primitive vacuum tube transceiver

Good 👍👍👍 😲

SO A TOW LANCHER BUT 100X BETER AND CAN BE CARIED WHAT EVER COUNTRY MADE IT IS AWSOME

@MatteV2

10 жыл бұрын

Sweden, fuck yeah.

@dtiydr

10 жыл бұрын

And this was introduced a whole 7 years ago.. when other countries didn´t knew shit so Sweden, fuck yeah!

@Scurck

10 жыл бұрын

dtiydr The original BILL system entered service in 1985 and the upgraded BILL2 did so in 1999. This video was probably created by Bofors during the late 90's as a sales pitch for foreign customers.

@dtiydr

10 жыл бұрын

Scurck Yea of course its way older then 7 years I can clearly see that in the vid as its a -90 video. Have no idea where I got that from.

@inigo5460

5 жыл бұрын

11 years from now :D

510 mm armor plates clean through, sick.. and this was over 7 years ago.

@TheSuperHybrid80

5 жыл бұрын

old tech sweden stopped using it in 2013 comes from the late 90's

@TheSuperHybrid80

5 жыл бұрын

old tech sweden stopped using it in 2013 comes from the late 90's

@TeddyKrimsony

4 жыл бұрын

510 mm of steel armor, nobody uses steel armor anymore or in fact since the 80s

@tictactoe101

3 жыл бұрын

@@TeddyKrimsony Steel is the last barrier to protect the crew when both the arena system and explosive charge armour fail. Also you dont need complicate system to deal with gun rounds incoming but steel armour

Poli

The 800k was the army, ad about 200k of homeguard, navy (marines) and airforce troops to that.

@prandomable

Жыл бұрын

should check out this Russian KZreadr. This small sandstone boulder rock ate up 4 RPG rounds like it was nothing. Only cracked the rock from the 4th hit however it didn't seem penetrated completely. He later shot that "same" rock later on his channel and that same rock ate up MORE RPG hits. РПГ - 7 - Застывшая в камне кумулятивная струя

@prandomable

Жыл бұрын

Hi, where you are located? I'm in Texas, USA. I have 2.5 meters thick of AR500 steel plates that I REALLY REALLY want to try. AR500 steel is much quite STRONGER than RHA as well. I don't have anti-tank weapons, and I don't have a property to try it either. But I have access to all those steel plates. I was hoping you used MORE RHA steel plates in the video to see how many of them it actually takes to stop the anti-tank round. I'm sure my AR500 steels can defeat that anti-tank rounds or whatever you guys have ;) I'm located in Texas, USA. I would love to try it...

i think its more susceptible to being intercepted by an active protective system because you can just fire a trophy charge verticly and it doesnt have to intercept anything horizontally

@heyhoe168

6 жыл бұрын

Since most active protective systems designed for the classic AT missiles it will make them more expensive, complex and unreliable.

Just realised what I want for Christmas 🤔

Did IKEA make this?

Penetration capability is impresive. Looks like its designed to kill the crew rather than blow the tank. Commander & gunner in particular or may be try to get into ammo stock of the turret. How does the missile know its just above the target?

@Scurck

7 жыл бұрын

Magnetic detection.

@IndoLiberation

6 жыл бұрын

what if there was a obstacle that having a material substance like a tank ? will the magnetic sensors blow the shaped charge ?

@heyhoe168

6 жыл бұрын

Complete Absence Of Light, there is a guidance system too. It should affect the detonation mechanic, I believe.

Nice

That 4th mode for helicopters.

The interior of that tank looks like the taco bell drive through lane.

So an updated and miniaturised version of the Panzerfaust?

@bytesurfer8651

5 жыл бұрын

Wow, seems like you came from the stone age

@Scurck

4 жыл бұрын

No, an updated and miniaturized version of the Bill 1 system....

Quoting #fpsrussia any agressors would have a "very bad day".

@TheLaphalainen

4 жыл бұрын

@@fredklum3062 did he say he was?

"Anywhere, anytime, any tank" I need one. I hate it when there are tanks in my neighborhood.

Are these big enough to take down a moose?

Is this a advertisement for slavs?

can anyone tell me how the wire guiding the rocket doesnt break with the stress and speed. it looks tiny in size but must be super strong

@plazmica0323

5 жыл бұрын

I think its shot ahead of launching a missile so it doesnt create much tension on the wire and wire is rolled out quite fast but not enough to snap it.

@MrSickass

3 жыл бұрын

The wire is 2000 meters, but the misile fly 1 sec after wire breakes before self destruct. The wire can handle the stress, me myself once tok out a Leopard 2 tank at 2200 meters in training. Must be one of the longest shots made by Bill 2. Also tok down 5 Leopard 2 tanks in one fiering positon. As long as reactiv armour doesnt protekt the tank its a easy kill.

That’s why Sweden was never invaded

@TheSuperHybrid80

5 жыл бұрын

Sure and Finland was between you and russia LoL

can this destroy a Merkava 4 and abrams tanks ?

oh yeah i have seen same kind of test with explosive reactive armor

So basically it's a missile with sideways-facing shaped charges?

@jgtheman84

11 ай бұрын

Yes but the shaped charges are shaped differently to form a ranged EFP.

One hit of those can even one shot an abrams by side.

thats a harsh weapon

If era wasn't detonated with precursor than what's the point ?

Guy was showing off for the camera and probably broke both ankles on that landing

Killer tank..

oh crap i have not seen a 113 in decades

its a shame that was a classic tank.

HOLY SHIT O_O ALL 17!!!!!

@gosciu555 Yes, there is, but there is also an optical sensor that keeps track of the distance to the target, so you would have to trick that as well and the combination is very difficult to trick. A far easier solution would be to fire at the shooter. the missile is a beam rider, so if the shooter doesn't laze the target, the missile will self-detonate.

They still are neutral because they have the best weapons and military. Like the Swiss.

I don't want to be a tank driver anymore.

Optional on the SAAB for 2021

WTF!? how is that man landing at ~0:50 wanna wreck your legs ? ... im confused - first they show automatic ... then manual ?

those tanks were t 72 ! from where they have them ???

@jacc13b10

7 жыл бұрын

***** can you buy gun's like usa ??

@Scurck

7 жыл бұрын

Old East-German army stocks. Sweden bought a couple of hundred MTLB's and BMP-1's from Germany and got a couple T-72 on the side, for testing purposes.

@heyhoe168

6 жыл бұрын

tacfoley, rubberized tracks for T-72 do exist. They are just not mass-produced for some reason.

Why does it have that string attached to it?

@Scurck

3 жыл бұрын

The launcher looks at the missile and corrects its flight path through the wire.

@oldog2

3 жыл бұрын

so if you miss the tank you can pull it back and try again

I want one 😄😄😄😄😄😄👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

How is this even possible?

Great cars, great missiles and great aircraft..... Wot else can SAAB make 😳 k

@Scurck

2 жыл бұрын

Radars, ships and submarines 😁

' this bill2 must be HIT on the turret and not top above the turret

Okay Sweden, we surrender; you can have the keys to the Presidential Limo. But make sure you fill up the gas tank when you're done.

And just like the TOW, the disadvantages are you have to steer it into the target, maintaining line of sight through the entire firing to detonation, and it most likely will fail if shot over a body of water (lake, wide river) as it's guidance wires tend to short out if immersed.

@Scurck

7 жыл бұрын

Sweden makes wire guided torpedoes that obviously work in water. So we can only assume that the Bill2 wires are insulated as well.

@blownhemi What? A little looting and pillaging never hurt anyone! Besides, we mostly hit cloisters. :P

The hatch-ring that was hit can clearly be seen, and it is thicker then the rest of the roof. The result was that the Bill2 dug a hole under the tank... If the tank had been filled with ammo (as in a combat situation) then the whole turret would have been blown into the stratosphere.

i'm pretty sure (maybe?) that they would make some kind of anti-bill2 weapon lol

@cmdrantezscar3368

7 жыл бұрын

such defence system allredy exists, but many aren't using it, Russains have it, their is called Shtora, Israel kalls theirs Thropy, but strangly enough the US dosn't use it.

HOOOOOOOLYY SHIIIT!!!!! O.O

Why do they have it on a guide wire?

@Scurck

9 жыл бұрын

Lorenzo Pacheco So it is unjammable. The user aims at the target and the launcher generates a laser beam, the missile then flies 'inside' of this beam and the launcher keeps track of where it is and steers it straight by sending commands through the wire.

@lorez201

9 жыл бұрын

Scurck That's a really fucking cool idea.

@macieksoft

8 жыл бұрын

+Scurck Really? I was always thinking its SACLOS guided just like TOW (launcher seeks for flare at the end of missile and sends a commands trough wire to correct missile flight path).

@macieksoft

8 жыл бұрын

+Scurck Really? I was always thinking its SACLOS guided just like TOW (launcher seeks for flare at the end of missile and sends a commands trough wire to correct missile flight path).

@Dramigbaklanges

8 жыл бұрын

+Scurck The missile has a diode at the rear with a coded signal that the sight track and guide it to the target via wire, the system does not send out any detectable energy in form of a laser beam.

Ikea ain't bad either

@imightbearacist6613

5 жыл бұрын

Horse meat

Part of an alliance like NATO or WP = small token armed forces armed with whatever downgraded weapons USA/USSR allow them to purchase. Non aligned = big independent military and in-house capability to produce the necessary (tailor made) weapons to protect the nation against any threat.

@aluisious

3 жыл бұрын

"Big military" that's smaller than the NYPD in personnel and budget.

@Scurck

3 жыл бұрын

@@aluisious Sweden during the cold war was among the most militarized countries in the world. Out of 8 million pop Sweden could mobilize: 100.000 homegyard within hours, 1.000.000 within two weeks and an additional 1.000.000 as deep reserve. And ad to those numbers many hundreds of thousands voluntary civilians with wartime placements.

Isn't this the same concept as the Javelin system?

@Tanquista120

6 жыл бұрын

Hawk 777 No sir, this is designed to be used as a stationary ATG and the ammunition explodes directly above the target.

@Rudizel

6 жыл бұрын

The Javelin has many attack modes, one of them is a top down attack especially designed for well armored tanks. It does the same thing comes down and detonates a shaped charge. The javelin has two war warheads the same as the Bill2, one designed to defeat the reactive armor and the other to penetrate the hull. The part where the Javelin shines is that its a "fire and forget" system. Soon as you fire it you can take cover and the missile is equipped with infrared seekers to track the target. The Javelin can operate at ranges of 4,750 meters and can penetrate up to 800mm of armor, far exceeding what the Bill2 can do.

@StormBringare

6 жыл бұрын

Apart from the missile carrying tandem heat warheads there are very few similarities between the two weapon systems. The Javelin is fire and forget and guids itself to the target, BILL is wireguided and needs to be guided until impact. Javelin strikes from an angle by flying upwards and then diving into the targets roof, BILL flies straight and detonates as it passes above the target.

@benconway9010

6 жыл бұрын

Bringer of Storms so basically the javelin is better

@StormBringare

6 жыл бұрын

Ben Conway In many ways yes. At the same time I think the Javelin can be fooled with heavy camouflage like the Bofors Barracuda system and/or IR blocking smokescreens. A SACLOS guided missile won't.

Hull down? More like hull breached!

5:45 No way.

4:06 think of having that as a potato gun :) Damn all 17 plates of armor O.o

@TeddyKrimsony

4 жыл бұрын

17 plates of steel armor, nobody uses steel armor anymore or in fact since the 80s

The only true test of weaponry is live combat.

Great footage, Intro music is terrible. May I suggest "...And Justice For All" by Metallica.

I think too many people are getting Sweden and Switzerland mixed up. The Swiss are neutral, the swedes are vikings LOL

chinese military: we need to copy this shit

@iviolin6211

3 жыл бұрын

stop typing, racist.

@Scurck

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, that seems right as this was developed in the 80's and that is about the level of Chinese tech today.

@pagghr51

3 жыл бұрын

@@iviolin6211 stop replying chinese wumaw

RIP Russia

@markohrastinski7835

9 жыл бұрын

Then god introduced the ERA armor .

@sculcrusher199

9 жыл бұрын

Wintutos you think that because russia has more nukes then they are always gona be better ? mate, no country in the world has the fucking balls to fire a nuke in anger, if they ever do its nothing but globally mutual assured destruction. Also thats fucking bullshit, they are not "missile proof"

@sculcrusher199

9 жыл бұрын

Wintutos they dont have the tsar bomb any more u nob that was ages ago, they have the satan or some shit, and no they are not missile proof because - guess what, if someones makes an ICBM, someones gona make something to shoot it down, mate if 2 two missiles hit each other at supersonic speeds - they will fuckin discintegrate

@sculcrusher199

9 жыл бұрын

Wintutos Ok, well my grammar is irrelevant - however if it makes you happy then fine. The second an ICBM is launched from anywhere - it would get picked up everywhere, not sure if you are aware but there are counter ICBM bases literally everywhere surrounding Russia - Middle East like Irsael, Saudi Arabia I think, and quite a few in Eastern Europe, then obviously the ones on home soil - UK and in the USA. Anyway my original point was that to have these really sophisticated nuclear warheads and missiles is pointless because like I said, no country (USA, Russia, China etc.) has the nuts to fire one in anger, because it would be mutually assured annihilation.

@sculcrusher199

9 жыл бұрын

Wintutos Mate there tends to be quite a few of well educated people on the internet, but talking/typing in abreviated language is just easier - I would obviously not write like that in an English exam. Also I'll have you know, I am educated. (Not going into details.) Now, besides from grammar again, yes we are. However if it was to be nuclear warfare, it would literally be the end of the world as we know it. So if, gods forbid, there is world war 3, just hope that it is conventional.

where is bill3 ?

@Scurck

5 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/ZmZ1q6WiqtvTZrw.html

The Swede have and can maintain neutrality by having strong independence armament industry.

@WilfredIvanhoe

2 жыл бұрын

Industry isn't enough if you don't have an army to use its products. And Swedes have driven their defenses to the ground, and only started rebuilding them recently.

@blocksarefun1

Жыл бұрын

@@WilfredIvanhoe back in the 70 and 80 when this was made it was one of the strongest on the planet

top and bottom tank has thinest armor and usually not protected by reactive armor... if you use this weapon and aim at front armor... then you just wasted it.

@Scurck

7 жыл бұрын

You aim straight at the target and the missile then flies above your line of sight.

Kill Bill 1 was better than kill Bill2 But you should watch both

@diegoochoa572

5 жыл бұрын

BenTheeban no u

Cant wait till this is used on russian tanks

No wonder "SAAB" stopped working on cars when they make weaponry such as this!!!

great stuff in 1989...lol

Imagine if such ingenuity were applied ending poverty and exploring our galaxy instead. We are only a small step above warring chimpanzees.

@selfdefender8609

5 жыл бұрын

In the real world you will be destroyed by the same "poor" savages long before that.