Explore the limits of scientific knowledge with Bjørn Ekeberg in his fascinating talk. Watch the full discussion here: iai.tv/video/beyond-the-big-bang-bjorn-ekeberg?KZread&

@NathanOakley1980 sent me while reviewing your video 👍

@user-hf9jr1qm4i

9 ай бұрын

Let me guess, he thinks he’s debunked all of astronomy

Where do I find the rest of your talk was just getting interesting?

The apparently ad hoc fixes to the model sound strikingly like Kuhn's description of the demise of a scientific theory. Kuhn deserves a mention in discussions such as this; perhaps Ekeberg does so elsewhere but I didn't notice it in his presentations that I have watched.

Very nice video. Thank you. I would argue that CIG Theory is correct. An introduction to CIG Theory can be found by clicking on the link above. Specifically watch Part II but recognize that Part I is a primer for Part II. Basically, space is unfolded matter. Also read the new comments in the comment section.

One way to approach a remote immense and complicated structure is to model it from the most simple and basic components and to avoid the temptation of rushing into characterizing it. To save our time just believe that big bang, dark matter, dark energy, time dilation, space-time, black hole are irrelevant.

Any cosmologist alive would love to overturn the Standard Model either of the history of cosmology or just about anything else. They would become famous and rich. The only physicists that are known are known because they tore apart an old model and created a new one.

Brilliant

@sensualgoat3718

9 ай бұрын

Brilliant concessions more like. Any evidence of earth radius?

Electric universe?

Space is expanding ... except toward the Great Attractor where it is contracting on a cosmic scale for unknown reasons ... the behavior looks like gravity but there is no evidence of matter being compressed... is it a worm hole? A black hole? Exotic matter?

@sensualgoat3718

9 ай бұрын

Meanwhile outer space is fake. Unless you can demonstrate gas pressure without a container then I have no reason to assume the sky is a vacuum.

@DanielSamaniego-of5xl

9 ай бұрын

Space is a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics!

📍10:19 2📍5:29

I thought that was Dave Portnoy for a second

where are the gluons? could it be that thats the fundamental force and comes in two versions one the infinite forcefields the other the balls made by the BB 'which was not one point, but an entire phothonforcefield which transformed the hole field at the same time, this explosion broke the surrounding fields and made balls of energy in all siezes , the big ones are in the center of galaxies and the smaller inside all objects no matter the sieze of it !!! This force is much stronger than electromagnetism and all objects are suspended between the surronding forcefield which again keep objects in the way the force field was before some kind of flat.A general formula would be; the wavefunction X sinlogZ minus some lost energy = total Energy so this leads to that total energy increases , if not so the energy would dissapear and we would not be here .

VEM =0Msquared. It's right.

If you want to study the cosmos, just study the electric universe model.

plasma

I’m not convinced this guy knows very much. ChatGPT could put together a talk not too different from this.

The irrational apes are not humans (no doubt about that).

@NathanOakley1980 sent me 👍

This is becoming another TedX.

The CMB was a prediction that was found to be confirmed, so more than an interpretation.

@xecyc7951

24 күн бұрын

Except the CMB is also predicted by other models, not only that, the CMB experiment is far from infallible, it's known that it has been tampered with to fabricate reliability and accuracy, when everybody and their mother knows how many things can tamper with the CMB results, like CO2 emissions, bird dung, environment, weather. Even the big bang model can't explain certain patterns in the newer CMBs without bringing up dark matter.

@kevconn441

24 күн бұрын

@@xecyc7951 rubbish.

Seriously, at this point I don’t think there should be any funding for cosmology at all until we have some assurance that we are going to have a livable biosphere to admire the pretty pretty lights from. Until then its a total misappropriation of money & mind-power that could be spent on an exigent earthly purpose.

@thstroyur

11 ай бұрын

​@@Willful.MysticShare a better one, then; shitting on other people's ideas is easier than coming up with your own

Earth’s axial rotation (wheel = 2 π) alters observations by the sum of (a wheel + a wave) = (2 π + 7.640395578). The visual effects = Errors = all published, peer-reviewed, classical and modern astronomy and physics. Take your physics and astronomy and shove it.

"The greater the specialization, the greater the blindspot." Hilarious. Every religion is its own specialized singularity of imaginative nonsense, imposed on societies across time and anchoring real progress and understanding.

@joemahma3017

10 ай бұрын

Yes, you’re very smart and logical.

Cosmology isn't a science. It's a joke

God created the physics mechanism that caused the big bang.

@brokenradiators5507

11 ай бұрын

What do you think created God? If God doesn't need a creator, why does a physics mechanism need a creator?

@frojojo5717

11 ай бұрын

@@adamnsmartguy3574 Honestly, that makes no sense at all.

@gmw3083

11 ай бұрын

The big bang and genesis are similar myths

@thstroyur

11 ай бұрын

​@@Willful.MysticGod is simply that which grounds reality; saying "God doesn't exist" is ignorant crackpot nonsense spouted by people who don't understand what they're talking about. That said, there's still a difference between primary and secondary causes being equivocated here, as well.

@wulphstein

11 ай бұрын

A physics mechanism has all of the physics laws, constants and properties built into it in a similar way that a human fetus has everything it needs to become a human. Since we're dealing with complex things that can't happen by accident, a Creator is required.