Neil and Chuck are one of the best pairs in both Science and Entertainment! No disrespect to the other comedian, but Chuck really has soul and charisma, he is perfect for these explainers.

@ingGS

2 жыл бұрын

@@kamikaze20018 Hahaha, thanks! I have changed it to “pairs”, I am not a native English speaker, I still think “couple” is fine, but I get the connotation some people might give to it.

@irenaveksler1935

2 жыл бұрын

@@ingGS lol

@irenaveksler1935

2 жыл бұрын

@@oemglobal3535 true

@andrewjustice210

2 жыл бұрын

I love chuck… but it’s always a pleasure when Paul Mecurio is there because I feel like he has a genuine curiosity and tries to actually learn while he is there…. Like EARLY chuck…

@catmate8358

2 жыл бұрын

Well, the other comedian is not really a comedian, he's a boxer, but yeah, he's good at comedy ;)

Neil is so entertaining. Who knew that learning could actually be fun and exciting.

@justcallmesomething8089

2 жыл бұрын

Millions of people for centuries

@Purpletrident

2 жыл бұрын

This is what Neil champions constantly why schools are failing students. No one should be happy to finally get out of school, they should be excited to go back in. If I had teachers as good at teaching as Neil, I'd want to keep learning forever!

@Haze-vi6ng

2 жыл бұрын

Teachers been telling us for years but not like Neil

@Haze-vi6ng

2 жыл бұрын

@@justcallmesomething8089 something

@Purpletrident

2 жыл бұрын

@@demonwaterdemonwater4993 What kind of point are you even trying to make?

Finally a face-to-face sit down. I missed these types of interviews.

We who are about to...learn... salute you 🖖🏾

I could seriously see Neil doing standup with astrophysics. It would be insane!

@LukeSumIpsePatremTe

2 жыл бұрын

How about EPIC RAP BATTLES

@sureshkrjsl

2 жыл бұрын

@Gene Dowen - I guess you are just discovering Neil?? He has been doing standup(not exactly standup comedy but still a lot of fun talk on Science) for decades. Here - kzread.info/dash/bejne/qaRqxdCpYc7Acrw.html kzread.info/dash/bejne/nKN1tLqTkcq6pbA.html Have fun

@clintharris8818

2 жыл бұрын

@@LukeSumIpsePatremTe lol

@blkcyborg92

2 жыл бұрын

@@LukeSumIpsePatremTe he committed on a rap about the planets in our solar system. It was actually good lol, y’all should look it up

@fgjui2

2 жыл бұрын

No it would be astronomical

Everytime I learn something I leave a thumbs up, I've given a lot of thumbs, and I have a lot more to give.

11:17 Chuck and his analogies 🤣

I always like Paul Mecurio hosting appearances 😀 👏 👏 very cool

I love this man! Brilliant man! Very smart but also so fun! I love this show too. ❤

i was just talking to my friend about this literal subject and this popped up omfg so good

@glenncastro1922

2 жыл бұрын

Your NSA case manager heard you through your phone..

I love Star Talk not so much about the information I receive, but the fun I have receiving it lol, if you can get people to laugh you've won half the battle...

I love the "primordial soup" on the bookshelf behind Dr Tyson LOLOL

Love your stuff

Very well explained Neil.

@7:38 Excellent job Lord Chuck!

So is it possible that in one of those parallel universes we are shrinking instead of the universe expanding?

The Earth has no edge is an amazing way to describe the unboundedness of the universe!

@jacoblinares2403

2 жыл бұрын

Isn't the highest altitude mountain technically the edge of the earth

@cecilbrisley5185

2 жыл бұрын

Well technically the atmosphere is part of the earth and just gradually thins out. Still very fuzzy edge somewhere depending on what criteria you decide upon for the extent of that atmosphere.

@mikey162

2 жыл бұрын

Can’t have earth without oxygen

@JohnyG29

2 жыл бұрын

@@mikey162 Yes you can. The Earth didn't have any oxygen until about 3.5 billion years ago.

Are we back in the studio/office?!?! Yes!

i miss paul!!! rewatching this

wish thiss one was longerr

@joseimpact

2 жыл бұрын

or wait is this a old episode just a clip . seems familiar

Please enlighten me. Since something has to be measured and observed what if we as humans were blind always and could not observe measurements. Does the universe and it's properties exist at all? I nailed this question so hard! I can't wait for responses!

I just joked under another video about wanting to know whether it makes a sound and you answered it! You are too good NDT. Also another win for the youtube algorithm.

@shrooman777

2 ай бұрын

My money was on no sound, but only because nobody was around to hear it.

0:27 yes and when they name something it stays there forever even if it is wrong, there are more than one example we would rather imagine other things to go around the problem instead of rename or solve the problem I am curious why ??????

Chuck: Your chances of being in an accident are much higher in rural Kansas. Me: Actually, rural America has about 29% of the population but accounts for close to 50% of all accidents. Drinking, speeding, distracted texting, and being sleepy are all major factors.

One question, where is Chuck?!

Eagerly waiting for when Science can finally reveal to us whether there truly is an omnipotent benevolent benefactor or similar deity, or are we all just out here completely alone in the cosmos, trying to wing it, utterly at the mercy of the fearsome forces of an awe-inspiring universe...

@prschuster

2 жыл бұрын

If we could discover God through the empirical methods of science, we would be reducing God to a natural phenomenon, which brings up the question, "what do we even mean by God". Science has always taken things believed to be spiritual or supernatural and reduced them to natural events. Diseases were considered evil spirits before we discovered microbes. Stars were believed to have mystical powers to affect our activities on Earth until astronomy disproved the efficacy of horoscopes. The theory of evolution has falsified the creation story in Genesis. If there really were a God, it would have to be either beyond the reach of scientific investigation or else another natural phenomenon.

@eleycki

2 жыл бұрын

Do we need to disprove Happy Potter too?

@TheBananacoco12

2 жыл бұрын

@@prschuster I'll post one of the best arguments for God: the fine-tuning. For instance, the big bang, at its conception, was so fine-tuned that if every subatomic particle in the universe was a zero - the number still couldn't be completed. According to Roger Penrose, the odds of it being that way was one part in^10^10^123 (Keep in mind that this is for life of ANY kind.) Here is the quote: "This is an extraordinary figure. One could not possibly even write the number down in full, in the ordinary denary notation: it would be `1' followed by 10^123 successive `0 's! Even if we were to write a `0' on each separate proton and on each separate neutron in the entire universe and we could throw in all the other particles as well for good measure-we should fall far short of writing down the figure needed." Also, Keep in mind that it's estimated that we have 10^82 amount of particles in our observable universe (that's 1 with 82 zeros.) To get away from the uncomfortable truth, the atheist has to believe in a metaphysical concept: the multiverse. The multiverse hypothesis states that we are just one of an infinite number of universes - so it would make sense why ours is so incredibly fine-tuned. The only problem is there is no evidence for the multiverse - or any way to verify it. "Not only does our universe follow finely tuned physical laws, but laws which seem to be finely tuned to enable life to exist. The most common atheist answer is to assert that our universe is one of many others - the "multiverse" speculation. It is interesting that atheists who refuse to believe in an unseen God, based supposedly on the lack of evidence for His existence, explain away the appearance of design by embracing the existence of an unknown number of other universes for which there is no evidence - or even any effect for their evidence." Roger Penrose on the low entropy of the big bang: "I cannot even recall seeing anything else in physics whose accuracy is known to approach, even remotely, a figure like one part in 10^10(123). And it"s not just each constant or quantity that must be exquisitely finely-tuned; their ratios to one another must be also finely-tuned. So improbability is multiplied by improbability by improbability until our minds are reeling in incomprehensible numbers. Are you willing to go where the evidence leads, even if the ultimate destination is an uncomfortable one? I'll also include two videos that touch upon how miraculous the fine-tuning is. 1.) kzread.info/dash/bejne/d3lrmNCwmdDbhJM.html 2.) kzread.info/dash/bejne/o2eoyqaIZMjZhNo.html "The first gulp from the glass of natural sciences will turn you into an atheist, but at the bottom of the glass, God is waiting for you.” ― Werner Heisenberg

@prschuster

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheBananacoco12 Be careful what you wish for. The God referred to with this Anthropic Principle may be the God of an opposing religion which proves your own faith wrong. This God fits every religion on Earth, including the Higher Power of Pantheists and Agnostics. For religious people, this Prime Mover or Supreme Being does nothing to confirm your own particular religion.

@TheBananacoco12

2 жыл бұрын

@@prschuster The anthropic principle is a weak argument. I'm stating a fact that the universe is finely tuned. The question is: why? Also, my friend, Christianity is different than every other religion. Every other religion is man coming to God. While Christianity is God coming to man. Every other religion is doing works to "earn" salvation. While Christianity is about grace (Jesus did it all.) And, logically speaking, if God is perfect, then who else but God could save us?

My laws. . . I can travel at the speed of texting. . Facts. . Lol

The Main Event, yep, makes more science connection than The Big-Bang. It will stick Neil, delicious info, thanxx for the learning, brilliant as always.

Hi, question: Is the big bang the creation of matter from nothing or is it the expansion of existing condensed matter?

Paul Mecurio is smarter than I had given him credit for.

😂😂we got to the moon and back😂😂 that’s a good one👍

YAY!

With his edge of the earth analogy. I think a better example of an expanding universe. Maybe say “start at the center of the earth and walk out word. There is an edge, however related to the universe. We could never travel fast enough to catch up. Because of the expansion “.

where is Chuck? we want Chuck 😢😢😢

@Boba1702

2 жыл бұрын

In the second half of the video.

Imagine getting high with your friends, then out of nowhere, one of your friends explain what was before the bug bang and what was inside it.

Awesome! 👍😎🌲🔥🇨🇦⭐

We want to know more about the Webb Telescope.

i HAVE A SILLY QUESTION: Who is your favourite character on the tv series The Big bang Theory? PS: thank you for always sharing your knowledge in manner which everyone can understand!

@pfft_5782

9 ай бұрын

Penny

12:47 now I understand the cosmic-web (just a basic understanding)

If matter was formed after the expansion began then there could be no matter within the proposed dense singularity before its expansion, just exactly then what is energy density when energy does not occupy any physical space ?

I love the 'the stuff of life is created in the cubicles of dying stars", mike judge would enjoy it too I suspect but won't be asking for his red swingline stapler back any time soon. :)

I love main event. Fun place. I digress though. lol. Anyway, I think the BIG EXPANSION is more apt.

Neil could you have Dr Jordan B Peterson as a guest on your podcast? I think that would be an amazing episode

@kevinlively7804

2 жыл бұрын

I would love to see Michio Kaku!

@DLCS-2

2 жыл бұрын

I personally don't see the point. One is a physicist and the other is a psychologist/theologist .

Plus what’s crazy is what mass and density does in quantifying an element is, why a repeating variable can summarize the bulk of a phenomenon. And why is it consistent in calculation … 🤷‍♂️

The proof of the globe is easy! Kudos to the scientific method to check that out!

Who's the Running with the Wolves guy at the end?

Oh man I got sent. I thought this was a new vid..

"The universe is under no obligation to make sense to you." Wow! Ain't that the harsh truth?

Cool

I’m convinced Neil is a time traveler

@tylerlormand5644

Жыл бұрын

not possible go watch his video with hawking

It should be called "The First Event"!

@robertafisher7120

6 ай бұрын

Like, "In the beginning?"

At 12 mins Carter says we know what was present at the Big Bang but not how it happened.So what ingredients were present?

how can you call the universe an age when gravity and speed causes a localized time dilation? is there really a continuity in the calculation to say that or is it some kind of average using our local timescale as an outside observer/point of reference?

I wonder if the hadron collider replicates the same area of vacuum, pressure, and tempeture as space, if not we should try colliding them under the same enviornment as space

@crittjudge985

2 жыл бұрын

That is a great point . Any molecules would be slammed into so i think it must be free of everything but what they're planning on colliding.

@TJXD

2 жыл бұрын

@@crittjudge985 well at CERN they collide protons, im just wondering what kind of stuff we'd learn from smacking protons in space,maybe it was a barrage of not just protons but other particles as well? Im all for CERN in space xD

The textbook to Neil's left is: Cavitation?

is the guy at 11:30 Khan from Star Trek?

Ask Neil: How did Earth end up with so much water?

@ravishankarr3507

2 жыл бұрын

Many believe the meteriods hit the earth contained traces of water.

@jarettwagner8858

2 жыл бұрын

Water ice is not rare in our solar system, it is one of the most common substances, only liquid water is rare.

@ASK-hy3vn

2 жыл бұрын

No one will ever give you a concrete answer, but terminologies you would never comprehend.

@slow-mo_moonbuggy

2 жыл бұрын

I love how people think water asteroids can exist in a 10 to the negative 17 torr vacuum of space let alone gas clouds or gas planets.

@Agent47316

9 ай бұрын

It was already here like TOI-733 b

Lol, indeed I am college educated but I'm only here because in charming. LOL

cool, thanks for sharing! But why matter didn't collapse under its own weight like it does in a blackhole during the first moments of that bang? I guess expansion of space itself was faster ... but that expansion just happens unexplained .... as well as accelerating expansion that universe undergoes now. So will accelerating expansion once again tear apart black holes that already exist at some point in a far future? Why ppl saying that they will evaporate instead?

@ryanbaker7404

2 жыл бұрын

Look up the cosmological constant. That’s what prevents the collapse, but it’s still wildly debated as to why it is what it is.

@illiakailli

2 жыл бұрын

@@ryanbaker7404 thanks! So its dark energy that was preventing collapse. Will it tear apart black holes earlier than they evaporate?

@ryanbaker7404

2 жыл бұрын

@@illiakailli That’s a fabulous question! I am sorry to say I don’t know the answer to that. If you really want to expand your knowledge on these subjects, get on KZread and watch every Leonard Susskind video you can!

@observationduty

2 жыл бұрын

@@illiakailli Black holes don't collapse because of weight technically, it is because of the gravity that can't be repelled anymore. Because of the shortage of burnable elements - Hydrogen/helium etc at the end of a star's life it can no longer keep the balance between fusion going outwards and the gravity trying to collapse it inwards. The singularity cannot collapse on itself because there is too much matter/energy trying to expand. I am by no means sure that's the answer, just came to the conclusion after I read your question.

@illiakailli

2 жыл бұрын

​@@observationduty thank you for correcting me, I definitely meant 'mass' and not 'weight'. I'll try to make my questions a bit less vague: - why matter didn't collapse under its own mass during the first moments of Big Bang (inflation)? - will black holes be torn apart during Big Rip at the heat death of the universe due to ever accelerating expansion? Obviously, I'm not looking for certainty here, but only for explanations provided by widely accepted mainstream models. Thanks!

Hey Neil! What if the observable universe is actually just a piece of a spiral of an even bigger universe?! Any signs of the "observable universe" spiraling and moving in a certain direction!?

I get the universe is expanding so it makes sense that if you go back in time, it gets smaller and smaller until it came from a singularity. But i just dont get how everything came out of nothing. Its fascinating to think about but Unfortunately we may never know where everything came from. Could it be possible that the universe has always existed? Hard to grasp that idea because everything we know has a beginning and an end.

There are very few classes of learning that people love attending and making straight A's while learning, this is one of them.

Neil, can you host a show, about light being found behind a black hole? Also, the 1979 Disney movie “The Black Hole”

What does the universe look like at this very moment compared to what it looks like to us? In other words, if information (light) from a galaxy takes 200 my to reach us, is it in an entirely different area of the universe now, or is space so large that it really isn't that much of a difference? Like the erosion of a mountain over several hundred years (really isn't that noticeable in most cases)?

@KeljuIvan

2 жыл бұрын

I think you've got it. Space is so big that it doesn't really matter. For example, our galaxy, the Milky Way, is about 53000 lightyears in diameter. If space is expanding at the speed of light, it would just be a change of 200 lightyears, which is less than 0,5% difference.

@EmpyreanLightASMR

2 жыл бұрын

@@KeljuIvan Oh cool... are you saying our galaxy is technically larger than how we perceive it?

@felipaorfr

2 жыл бұрын

The expansion is something like 74.3 plus or minus 2.1 kilometers (46.2 plus or minus 1.3 miles) per second per megaparsec. A megaparsec is roughly 3 million light-years. So in the scale of a galaxy, like the milk way, is nothing, and gravity is stronger than the expansion. It is only noticeable in larger distances and structures. So a galaxy measurable at 200m lightyears away is much further from us right now. But the milk way it is not expanding, gravity takes over in this scale and the expansion is not happening at local scales.

@EmpyreanLightASMR

2 жыл бұрын

@@felipaorfr Yessss thank you! I struggle with the "per second per megaparsec" bit as I've never been good at imagining more than one "per" at a time. So is every 3 million miles in any direction stretching away at ~75 km per second?

@felipaorfr

2 жыл бұрын

@@EmpyreanLightASMR Yes, the farther two points are in the universe, the faster they are moving away from each other. It is space itself that is expanding, so the more space you have, more expansion you have. In fact, if you do the math, you will see that there is a sphere around earth where we can see thing. Outside this sphere, things are moving away from us faster than the speed of light. So light emitted from these objects will never reach us. That's the concept of "Observable Universe". It is a sphere with 93 billion lightyears in diameter around us, where we can still see things. Outside of this, the universe is hidden from us.

where is chuck ?

New name for the big bang: Spawnpoint

A hybrid of quantum space, this is the theory of ether + theory of quantum strings = quanta of membranes (such as rosebuds). It will turn out 1) the quantum Universe from chaos. 2) Universe from quantum fractals. 3) The visible Universe is on the border between fractal and chaos. Volume - the quantum space of the Universe, depends on the seasonally opening working quantum of membranes, so that any quantum particle through the chaos of the quantum of membranes is washed away simultaneously in the entire Universe, but through the fractals of the quantum of the membrane, smooth spaces, you can determine the place where the quantum is likely to very often be particle.

All i can think of is Reynolds vs Reynolds IASIP

I got one question for everyone, how can we possibly know how big a planet out in space is? If you know nothing from the start, you cant messure how far and you dont know how big? Cause the smaller, more far away, bigger = closer. And at the same time, if its far away, it will apper small. My english sometimes lol... Some will hopefully get it. Somethings not adding up

@HarryNicNicholas

2 жыл бұрын

pythagorus. i'm no maths or astronomy expert but you can measure the angles things make, ie the width of the moon, calculate how far away it is and then from the angle get the diameter. then apply that to any other object. you work out distance by parallax - two points of view will give you this distance to the object. like range finders on heavy guns, or binoculars - it works the same way as your eyes, your brain works out the angle between each eye and tells you how far away an object is basically.

Can anyone explain where the singularity existed? If space time and matter had a beginning then where was the singularity right before the Big Bang? Wouldn’t it need to exist somewhere outside of this universe if the whole universe was compressed in to this singularity?

Good to see Paul again. But... ...Where is Chuck Nice? Hello? Builler? Builler?

this theory is even more outrageous than any theory regarding a creator or aliens

Im very depressed..but its hard to know how to feel after learning we are just artificial intelligence in a simulation universe. My depression seems bottled up, without a way to release now? I cant be alone with this feeling??

@freddiereadie30

2 жыл бұрын

The technique is just to make the most out of your existence, and stop worrying about the things you cannot control because it's out of your hands.

@cecilbrisley5185

2 жыл бұрын

Why is that a problem? The terms "artificial" and "simulation" are pretty arbitrary. Artificial in what way? Reality is still reality. An artificial apple is still real. Artificial flavours still taste and are real. Artificial intelligence - artificial in comparison to what? What would artificial intelligence look like in comparison to "real" intelligence? Our intelligence developed naturally. Isn't that "real"? Same goes for simulation universe. A simulation is real. We can't simulate anything without using reality. If the simulation is the reality we exist in, what difference does that make? Simulation implies (but doesn't necessitate) a reality that simulation is coming from too. The problem isn't so much the information, but how you are processing it through the lens of depression. Get help with that depression. I was a bottler myself and it almost killed me. It made me physically unhealthy with ibs and back pain. Takes time and medications if needed, need to be tailored to your unique body. Hard to have the patience to do what you need to do with depression telling you it's hopeless. Worked for me. IBS is gone. Back pain is only what it should be for my condition and is no big deal. I got strong and healthy with the excersise. I was recently diagnosed with a very dangerous cancer, very low odds. Months in hospital alone through covid rules, huge life changing surgery and loss of all that muscle. I used to want to die and the negativity of that situation would have finished me. Instead I fought. Death didn't scare me, I wanted more life. I was having a good time and I would like more. Beating the odds big time with it now. I should be dead, but have about a coin toss chance of making it 5 years and my odds go up alot with each year that I will live a normal span. Try getting through that with depression! Simulation or not, you are important and you are worth it. Get some help.

@JohnyG29

2 жыл бұрын

We're not in a simulation universe. That's just a hypothesis.

Quantum for the very large? We're expanding and contacting at the same time. You'll never see the edge.

10:47 is rhis another atkinson role?

The edge of the Earth is where the ground meets the air.

13.8 billion earth's years to be precise. Maybe in other galaxies, the amount could be less. Maybe it just happen yesterday according to their measurements.

We think we are the "Crown of Creation". We constantly still are looking for the Creator in the same way as a child (programed) to look for meaning from our "Father". We assume by prejudice that there must be some anthropomorphic being behind the creation and the workings of reality and the Universe. Concepts like "what happen before the Big Bang" have no meaning as nothing happened at all. How long did it take before big bang have no meaning as there was no time before it. Time is one of the qualities of the Bang.

We should rename the "Big Bang" to "The Expansion".

🌲 🌳 trees I noticed from the tents 🏕 as shadow cast the acorn Tree from inside the canopy actually looks like the life stem veins of the autumn 🍁 🍂 leaves 🍃. I felt like a human microscope 🔬 Yet I saw 👀 for the 1’st time. The tree 🌲 🌳 lives thriving life . Yet It has help from ground root to top canopy including water 💧 including Ants 🐜 Including the squirrel 🐿 It’s a nice way to observe. Things we take for granted. For context. 🤷‍♂️😁👍

What is the universe expanding into ?

This is one of the questions haunting my brain & mind❕ 👻 🧠 : 🤔 🧐 Are you like me when this happen you think of the Big Bang you think of the probable Multiverse ❓

@DLCS-2

2 жыл бұрын

Are you talking about Dimensions or that there might be another group of universe at the edge of the current universe , kinda like galaxies ?

@Atom_Line

2 жыл бұрын

@@DLCS-2 Dunno why exactly you said ‘ Like galaxies ‘❕😐 I talk about minding a lot : each time I think about the Big Bang I think about How maybe there are another ones ❗️☺️ This was clearer ❔😃

@DLCS-2

2 жыл бұрын

@@Atom_Line i meant as in there are multiple universes in Our greater universe that exist in our time or Dimensions as in different times. Another example is : Imagine a sheet a paper and there is a hole in it .This is our universe . Now my take for (Space) is : Are there other "holes" in this sheet of paper or just one ? Or the other option : Do other sheets of paper exist with holes in them ( Time/Dimensions) ? Hope this was a clear alnaogy !

@Atom_Line

2 жыл бұрын

@@DLCS-2 Thank you for your reply❗️😐☺️ I think there are at-first parallel universes holding another versions of us. Then we can go higher into dimensions until seeing the Multiverse from its own outside by reaching 12 dimensions❗️😎

Question. Is light really the fastest thing in the universe? If so does that mean the expansion of the universe (dark matter) is happening at a slower rate than the speed of light? meaning eventually light will be quicker than time itself?

@GintaOtaku

2 жыл бұрын

The universe can expand "faster than light" because stuff inside it isn't moving FTL, but the universe itself is stretching. The space is stretching That's the reason we have an "observable universe". Anything after that observable horizon is "moving faster than light", so the light those celestial bodies emit will never reach us

@qasimakbar7939

2 жыл бұрын

@@GintaOtaku ahhh! cheers Julio well explained :)

Wait, so noise isn't necessarily sound. You hear all the time about line noise or electromagnetic noise so wouldn't the big bang have created noise but not sound noise?

@crittjudge985

2 жыл бұрын

The background noise of the big bang is static sounding if i remember correctly.

The 'Big Flash'!

Where is Chuck??????!!!

So I’m the last video did Neil turn into the blues brother or the metal god?

What was before the big bang? how did the universe begin? What was before that?

who's the cohost at the beginning?

@AndrewBrowner

2 жыл бұрын

Paul Mecurio! seen him do stand up a few years ago in Edmonton, was this a one time appearance on a podcast they did or does he work with Neil full time now?

Where is Lord Chuck? Still informative.

@Boba1702

2 жыл бұрын

In the second half of the video.

Can we possibly call it either "The Big Expansion" or "The Great Expansion"? I ask only because "bang" and "explosion" are not factually correct adjectives to describe the ever continuing event. Expansion fits almost perfectly.

Ah you guys left out the best explanation, where Niel is asked where did the big bang happen? Like in what place and do we know that place or something? And Niel explained that you can think of reality as a balloon, where the big bang, or the "theory of inflation" (as its the correct scientific name for the theory of the big bang) is literally like thinking of that balloon inflating... (With the difference that the surface of the balloon represents both space and time...). So where did the big bang happen? It happend everywhere! :O

Hey Neil, why did you say that earth is on the Sagittarius arm of the milky way on that morning show all those years ago?? Carl Sagan said that as well? When did it change to Orion? Please respond sir.

During the big bang, the elements were created from energy so the small point was basically energy and after it started to expand it created matter, no?

@crittjudge985

2 жыл бұрын

Via cooling . Yep i think thats right

2:26

Real quick my team of 6 invented. Oops. Created all that is. . And what will ever be. . . And we right here with you. . . Lol

Woohoo!!

🤷‍♂️😁👍 boomerang 🪃 💥 theory. 🤔 💭. Hmmm 🧐! ? Lots of swirling.💫🌎✨🪃 🌬 💨. Curve is steady also. 😁👍 a thought. However the boomerang 🪃 is really neat. 🤷‍♂️

Big Bang with no noise 🤣