We have a new 2024 CX-5 Carbon Edition. Absolutely love it!

Test drove both, bought the CX-5. Don’t really haul large items and like the higher ground clearance. Also like that it’s nimble and drives like a sedan. CX-50 is nice too, but more for those who need more utility.

@HiPlains1

18 күн бұрын

Plus the CX-5 does not have the cylinder deactivation. Believe me, that brings in a ton of potential problems down the road. Its not worth the small gain in MPG's In this case your lucky if you add 1 MPG. No thanks. People buy the CX-5 because they trust its reliability over time. Facts.

Another nice video, Jonathan. As someone who has had experience with both the CX-5 (2018 AWD and 2020 FWD) and the CX-50 (2023 AWD), both non-turbo I have to say that both vehicles have their merits. I enjoyed both CX-5's (the AWD was better regarding traction over the FWD model), but what I appreciate about the CX-50 is the longer and wider cargo area. Just the other week I had to bring an unbuilt bookcase to my daughter's house. It just fit in the CX-50, but would not have fit in the CX-5 (this is with moving the front passenger seat forward). There are some features of the CX-5 which I miss, such as the better side windows (I find there is more wind noise in the CX-50 over the CX-5), but the lower and wider CX-50 has less body roll than the CX-5. I say test drive both, and carefully consider what features are most important when choosing which model you want.

@jbrown4137

Ай бұрын

Love the CX-5. The 50 is a bit more than I need. I got the 2023 select it gives me everything I need and more. And longer trips off the interstate I can get 36 to 38mpg with the AWD version

I've had a 2018 CX-5 Touring, 2021 CX-5 GT, and now a 2024 CX-50 Premium Plus (all leased). I like the extra room and look of the CX-50, although now I feel the CX-5 is a better overall for me. The roofline is a little lower on the CX-50 and I kept hitting my head stepping in and out when I first got it, took a bit of getting user to. Also the added width and flared out fenders of the 50 caused me to curb my wheels a little a few times which I never did on my 5. But that's me personally. I do really love the handling of the 50. It seems to corner much better than the 5, could be due to the 20" wheels and wider tires, but the 50 feels more planted which is ironic for a vehicle targeted for a more off-road customer base, which I'm not. Next lease will probably go back to the CX-5, depends how Mazda updates it in a few years.

Thanks, Jonathan Since we already own 2 CX-5's (2015 & 2019) and are getting ready to trade/sell the older 2015 CX-5 for a new 2024 CX-5 Signature, and after looking at both, we still prefer the CX-5 over the CX-50. Although I'm really excited that Mazda will finally start making the CX-50 Hybrid later this year and will hopefully bring to the USA the new generation CX-5 in a hybrid model.

Outstanding Video! The CX-50 definitely the better buy. Honda needs to follow Mazda's example in sticking to what really works instead of manufacturing terrible CVT engines. Good job!

Jonathan in the end of the video you said it all, made in Alabama with cilinder deactivation. I'll the cx5 thankyou .

Bought a cx-5 premium plus. Love it!

I was edging more for the CX-50 except for one thing. Cylinder deactivation. It was interesting they also made that available on the CX-5 but then they removed that feature. IMO, the reason they removed it from the CX-5 was from customer backlash. Generally speaking cylinder deactivation brings more problems then the tiny MPG improvement it brings. Unlike start/stop tech their is no way to turn it off. In short, its a show stopper issue for me. And being the trusty CX-5 threw that out I think Mazda knows many of their customers want no part of that. I think I'd get the turbo though. 187 HP would be a bit sluggish pulling a 3800 lb car. Also like they still use that 6 speed auto instead of CVT. People buy the CX-5 because they don't want any problems. Price point is competitive and they have them on the ground unlike the Yota which IMO, are not as reliable as this. These things can rack up a ton of miles and take a beating.

Waiting for the next generation CX-5.

@jbrown4137

Ай бұрын

Then wait for at least the second or third year. First year is most likely to have issues with a new gen. Great company now with awsome record, but never trust first year of new gen from any company. Unless they give you a free 12 year 150k warranty bumper to bumper lol

Front left corner of the cx5 driver seat looks odd… is the Mazda cx50 seat curse spreading?? Love my meridian cx50 but others in all trims seem to be having the “leather” seats cracking. Mine is sharing to crease so cracking is next…

Cx 5 better made is made in Japan vs cx 50 in Alabama

I can't believe how much you get for the money in mazdas, if you want similar features in honda or Toyota it'll be probably be 40k + on a similar rav 4 or crv

@JSS

Ай бұрын

I know it’s unbelievable how high they have gotten.

None of the 2024 cx5 have cylinder deactivation?

We have a CX5 2024, love it. The fuel tank size is too small.. on both.. should be at least a 17 gallons, under thigh support for taller drivers as well.

I would choose a CX-5 over a CX-50, because the CX-50 looks sort of blocky-weird towards the rear IMO, & just more cheap/budget looking in-general due to more plastics & those awful front & rear cutouts. I would avoid any trims with the cylinder-deactivation tech added though regardless of what Mazda crossover I went with. Mazda shoots themselves in the foot IMO with certain awful/intrusive tech they force on consumers in order to meet fuel/economy regulations (cylinder deactivation & stop/start tech).

As always, Great car vid's. But.... Once again, Mazda misses the boat on Carbon edition. NO Sirius/xm. What is the deal with Mazda leaving this standard feature off the lower trims. Doesn't make sense. Oh wait, yes it does, you have to bump up thousands of $$ just to get a radio. More $$$ for Mazda.

@sosimpleandrew

Ай бұрын

There is a way around: I used my phone XM app while driving 23 carbon. I know that is not ideal, but worked well for me

@jbrown4137

Ай бұрын

Yeah better to have XM and a bad looking vehicle. If your desire to have XM is the ultimate decision you need ro rethink priorities. Or maybe you prefer ugly with XM, over no XM and a premium look. Oh and since XM isn't free, better to have it better looking than access to a paid service.

They should add those nice 19 inch black wheels on other lower trim CX5 models. The 50 looks great & rugged but only in its 2nd year of production & not built in Japan..

@scotth5132

Ай бұрын

I'd like to buy a 2024 Carbon CX-5 with 17 inch wheels. Different strokes . . .

Can you gloss black all the plastic trim front and back and also the emblem as an upgrade ?

@michael2275

8 күн бұрын

In Canada we get that as the sport design trim. Just bought a CX-5 turbo sport design in machine grey. It looks great.

CX50

@michael2275

8 күн бұрын

As long as you dump within 5 years that's ok. If you plan to own longer than that I think you will regret.

It's going to be the CX-50 for me.

@michael2275

8 күн бұрын

As long as you dump within 5 years that's ok. If you plan to own longer than that I think you will regret.

Cylinder deactivation wears down your engine faster than without it! I wouldn't be stupid to go with the activation! It wears out your starter, your fuel injectors, and piston rings! nah, stay a way from cylinder deactivation if you want your vehicle longevity!