Very helpful! People saying the P1000 wins, but the point is not by a huge margin. The cheaper scope is a solid option for people who don't want to break the bank. And, it has the benefit of never needing batteries (when used with your eye)

Very good comparison! You needed to lower the exposure a bit on the Nikon P1000 and the image would appear a bit sharper and better.

@Pracitcalscience

3 ай бұрын

Agreed 🙏

@zmjadigital8329

8 күн бұрын

Could you record a video to help out and share on your account?

P1000 win!!

@eljay5009

Ай бұрын

How so - IMO the Celestron looks sharper for a given magnification. The final image is not a fair comparison - since it's using the inbuilt digital zoom which gives the false impression of additional magnification. IMO they should have both been compared at maximum optical magnification only.

@user-yi5no6lg5x

Ай бұрын

​@@eljay5009in my opinion the Nikon wins too. If you look at the pictures from a bigger screen ( PC or TV) you will see that the iphone one might look sharper, but it actually has less detail. Also the digital zoom of the Nikon is pretty much crop. You can do the same with the other picture with a software( i did that) and saw that P1000's image quality is way better.

@philipchesleyiii

25 күн бұрын

​@@user-yi5no6lg5x There is a T-ring adapter for the Ultima. You can use any camera with it. So don't use a cellphone.

@Aneliuse

23 күн бұрын

Ok saved me 5 minutes

It would be helpful to do a digital zoom on the Ultima to make the video image the same size as the zoomed Coolpix so we can tell the quality apart.

Could you tell me the name of the tripod used for the P1000. Also did you use a quick release plate, if so, what was the it?. Thanks.

@Pracitcalscience

16 күн бұрын

Manfrotto MVH500A-Fluid head with a video tripod 🙏

Owning P1000, decent camera for bird photos, master the cam far enough you get some decent images.

Good comparison

@Pracitcalscience

3 ай бұрын

🙏

so 60x Celestron is the same as 125x on Nikon?

@Pracitcalscience

Ай бұрын

Can't be sure, but the observation is really confusing 🙏

@news7908

20 күн бұрын

Yes 😂

you did an excellent comparison thank you very { p1000 } :

@Pracitcalscience

Ай бұрын

🙏

300 $ is the price for a 90/900 mm Bresser or Skywatcher achromat with tripod and mount or even 102/1000 mm Bresser achromat with steel tripod and EQ3 mount, which I guess have a clearly better image quality.

Excelent video

@Pracitcalscience

3 ай бұрын

🙏

Thank you for this video, very interesting. So the 125x of Nikon is like 60x of Celestron? There is another video on KZread that suggests the same thing, digital devices tend to show objects further than traditional optics. Nikon wins thank to digital zoom, I've got TS 110ED and the power like 125 is very sharp, I'm curious if the additional digital magnification of Nikon is good enough to match the telescopes like mine. It seems that Nikon should double its optical power by digital zoom to be eqal to 125x of telescopes. What do you think? Will you do a comparison with your telescope at 125x or something like such a power? Am l right as far as visible power is concerned?

@Pracitcalscience

3 ай бұрын

Completely agreed with you. I will definitely try to make the comparison in the future 🙏

@Poshlivyvsenahuy

3 ай бұрын

125x - это не увеличение, это разница между 24 mm и 3000 mm на широком и длинном конце камеры.

@eljay5009

Ай бұрын

Digital zoom is pointless - it doesn't give you any additional detail. You should only ever compare optical systems at the same optical magnification. Once you start zooming digitally, you have no idea what processing the camera is doing to create the final image.

@lightcatcher590

Ай бұрын

@@eljay5009 It's true but it gives some aditional détails if optical zoom is very sharp because human eyes can't see perfectly the very small details. One must have a good basic image in order to use digital zoom, if it's not the case, the digital zoom gives almost nothing.

@eljay5009

Ай бұрын

@@lightcatcher590 But the lens on the P1000 is already at or beyond it's diffraction limit (particularly since, as I understand it, it stops down to F/8 at 3000mm).

Вообще для себя Sony ZV-E10 стоит брать или не стоит тратить и для дома (семейных каких-то посиделок дома или на улице под шашлычок) достаточно Canon EOS R100 с головой ? Просто в разбежке цен можно для R100 еще оптики докупить. Кто подскажет ? боюсь что R100 (условно) будет снимать также как мой пиксель или жены хонр. (формат изображения) RAW есть у обоих телефонов ! Просто что-то загорелось вместо Nubia Red Magic 9 Pro фотик взять ! Вот уже 4 день инет в поисках инфы переворачиваю

니콘 P1000 오토모드에서 10m, 20m, 50m, 100m, 200m, 300m, 500m, 1km, 2km, 5km 실제 인물 화질이 궁금합니다. 골프장, 야구장, 축구장, 야간 공연장 등에서 인물이 어느정도 화질이 나오는지 테스트 영상이 궁금합니다. 많은 이들이 제일 궁금해 할 내용인 것 같은데요~ 영상 제목을 이라고 만들면 될 것 같은데요. 인물 대신 털, 눈섭 까지 있는 큰 곰, 사슴 인형 같은 것도 괜찮겠네요 ~ 실제 야구장 축구장 골프잘(볼 날아가서 떨어지는 것 촬영 가능한지), 공연장 실제 영상이면 더 좋겠네요. 영상에서는 거리가 얼마인지가 중요한데 거리 보다는 중을 얼마 했는지에 초점이... 참, 메모리는 최대 512 까지 인식 사용 가능한가요?

Both Zoom is different

Now stack up the telescope in front of the camera to get the ultra ultimate zoom

Más alcance la nikon

CU + iPhone can cost some money too 😁

How about 4k recording can go 125x? Quality is ok?

@Pracitcalscience

3 ай бұрын

Till 125X(max optical zoom), it's fine, but digital zoom is horrible.

@jayesh5131

2 ай бұрын

Thanks 🙏​@@Pracitcalscience

@Pracitcalscience

2 ай бұрын

You're welcome. God bless 🙏

NIKON