Not much of an education if you cannot have your test marked and answers explained......

1 = a unsportsman like C4 2 = no travel, lost control, regained then took his designated 2 steps 3 = Offensive ilegal screen (he was moving, leaving a disadvantage to the defensive player. 4 = travel, slid his final step/pivot foot 5 = Very hard to call, he was there first, with both feet on the ground, was facing forward. with further review, i would call a offensive charge. went straight into defenders torso 6 = i see ball contact, then from the momentem of the offender arm contact was met. ether a no call or jump ball. 7 = cant hear what the coach is saying, if it was extreme, call the T with or if not too extreme give warning at next dead ball. 8 = ether a flop or foul, he was there first but deff didn't have both feet on the floor leaving him liable for foul. with the over exaggeration of the 'head knock' would be completely up to the reffs and to how the game has been played before. 9 = Big foul, almost unsportsmanlike. grabbing of the guernsey causing the unbalance. i would call foul, and quiet warning to the deff pulling the shirt 10 = no foul, straight up in cylender. off jumped into the correct deffender 11 = cant see too blind lol 12 = can see a slight draging of the foot but, still had a step

@wolfy478

Жыл бұрын

10 - it could have been either nc or def foul, as from this angle it does look like the defender did jump forward into the player which means he is out of his legal defending cylinder

I believe 3. Was an illegal screen

@Zbutter45

4 жыл бұрын

Yep, illeagal screen, definitely should have been called earlier but tgey made tge offensive

@Zbutter45

4 жыл бұрын

Call so it dont really matter

@CanttaketheHeat82

4 жыл бұрын

Your correct. And it's a offensive foul after the missed call.

@why-even-try-brotendo

3 жыл бұрын

@@CanttaketheHeat82 Defensive hold. Watch the defenders right hand grab a hold of the screener. He made it look like the screener was moving by pulling him.

Answers please.

1-unsportmanlike 2-uncurrect 3-doublefoul 4-travelling 5-defensive foul 6-foul 7-no call 8-block 9- foul 10 -foul 11- white player touches the ball 12-no travelling

1.unsportsmanlike foul 2.NO travelling 3.double foul 4.travelling 5. NO foul 6. foul 7. firt time call a warning and after that give a technical foul [ depends on interpenetration] 8. no call 9.bottom foul 10. yes, is foul 11. purple last touched 12. nope

12 is travelling due to the right pivot foot sliding forward. That's a good call.

there's so much situation in this 1 game. man i don't know what to say

1) Yes, if a "breakaway foul", in the context of this test, is an unsportsmanlike foul. But this IS a "2 and the ball" "intentional foul", as the official in the clip signals. 2) I can see why the call was made -- because it did appear as if the player had regained control to dribble the ball again after it went off his body. 3) Offensive. Ref couldn't see it at first, but Purple 14 has the arm hooked. 4) I think that was about four steps! Traveling, everywhere except the NBA. :) 5) Doesn't quite give the step. Blocking foul. Two things you look for -- giving the sufficient step and whether he's wider than what he is allowed to be with respect to his frame. 6) Foul, and a possible T on White 19 as well for the demonstration afterward. 7) If it's correct, it's close. There does appear to be contact with 7 White, but probably not enough to lose the advantage, as the play continues with the ball passed back out. That's not one I think the coach should argue, because it didn't seem like it disrupted the play's flow. 8) He's not set, so blocking foul. No flop. 9) Foul on White occurs first, he's grabbing the jersey. Otherwise, it'd be an offensive foul for the shoulder for position on 14 Purple. 10) This is one I think you could see changed. Many years, the call you see is the one you get. But the fact is, White initiates the contact by coming forward. Defending player has a vertical right from his body all the way up. 11) Purple. White ball. 12) That's a jump-travel.

@jonnyharris7

3 ай бұрын

You'd be a terrible ref. Normal foul. Attempting to play at ball. Ridiculous to see that as unsportsmanlike. Bad call. Ball came loose but bounced and recontrolled with bounce. That's a no call. Agree - offensive Clean. Stride stop. Pivot foot didn't move. Buy glasses. Agreed. Block. Offensive player had made move to basket. Defender not established. Agreed. Foul by both defenders. Not even close. No foul by defender. Bad take. Defender is allowed lateral and backwards movement. Defence was there first and was clearly hit in torso. Offence initiated contact with defender moving laterally in cylinder. Either no call or offensive foul. Jersey pull was first - agreed. Terrible take if you think that's even close to offensive. No travel. Just a jump stop and an awkward shot attempt. Bad call again. Tough one. But foul is correct call. Offence jumped forward into shot. If defender jumps vertically then that's a no call. However, defender jumps forward and obstructs offense in air and landing. Illegal. Can't tell from that angle. Tough to judge. Jump stop - would have been legal but he slid pivot foot slightly. Correct call. Travel.

basketball rules test for international basketball? cause they are playing with an international basketball

1. Normal foul. Attempting to play at ball. Ridiculous to see that as unsportsmanlike. 2. Bad call. Ball came loose but bounced and recontrolled with bounce. That's a no call. 3. Agree - offensive 4. Clean. Stride stop. Pivot foot didn't move. Buy glasses. 5. Agreed. Block. Offensive player had made move to basket. Defender not established. 6. Agreed. Foul by both defenders. 7. Not even close. No foul by defender. 8. Bad take. Defender is allowed lateral and backwards movement. Defence was there first and was clearly hit in torso. Offence initiated contact with defender moving laterally in cylinder. Either no call or offensive foul. 9. Jersey pull was first. No travel. Just a jump stop and an awkward shot attempt. Bad call again. 10. Tough one. But foul is correct call. Offence jumped forward into shot. If defender jumps vertically then that's a no call. However, defender jumps forward and obstructs offense in air and landing. Illegal. 11. Can't tell from that angle. Tough to judge. 12. Jump stop - would have been legal but he slid pivot foot slightly. Correct call. Travel.

did know one see in number 3. the clear offensive moving screen? lol how was that missed!

1. unsportsmanlike foul 2. legal play 3. double foul 4. travelling 5. offensive foul 6. foul 7. agree 8. blocking 9. travelling 10. Foul 11. Violet 12. Travelling

1. Intentional Foul 2. Not traveling but offensive player could possibly be called for charging 3. Starts with an illegal screen aka moving screen, which left uncalled leads to holding foul but the screener! 4. Hard to see from this angle but it looks like he already taking his two steps but didn't shoot = Traveling. 5. Charging! 6. No.8 did nudge the Purple 11 while driving, so the referee isn't wrong to call that, though I thought it didn't have much effect on Purple 11. Maybe it would a good no call and let them play. I thought White center had good block. Maybe a Jump Ball should be called instead of a foul vs. no call. 7. I think it's a no call. Not sure though if coach deserves a technical. I don't speak Russian xD 8. I feel it's a flop and because video replay backs that, I would call a block because I don't like floppers xD 9. Foul for pulling his shirt 10. To me it looks like a no call. But if I am there in the game and I hear a smack of the hands, i'll call it :) 11. Last touch, purple team 12. No travel there, to me. What a frustrating game it must be for these guys :/ Thank you for sharing!

1. yes (excessive contact caused from the defender on a fast break from the left side); 2. not sure if the left foot touches the floor for a second time, maybe the official is right; 3. perfect example what could be also illegal screening, late called; 4. absolutely legal action; 5. the defender takes a stationary position on the court before the offender and takes the contact on his torso - offensive foul (charging); 6. no foul; 7. I am not sure what is the protest of the coach about, but if it is for three seconds violation - he has right. Maybe the overreacction of the coach 'won' him the TF; 8. the defender is not in a stationary and legal guarding position, also we have an overreaction of the contact; 9. if it is a foul, it is an unsportsmanlike foul; 10. there is no illegal contact to the hand what the referee says after this action because the offender initiates the contact and shortens the distance; 11. from that angle is difficult to say; 12. 100% no travelling;

@JoeSourBauer

7 жыл бұрын

defender has both hands pressed on screener the entire time. whistle is late tho letting them play is ok IMO until defender finally wraps his arms around screener and he pins defenders arms forcing a call. depending on context in game a double foul could absolutely be correct

@EDgametr

7 жыл бұрын

6.absolutelu foul 10. Travelling right decision

@adomir19961202

7 жыл бұрын

EDministrator Please tell me where actually the foul is when there is a clear defensive play for the ball?! :)

@adomir19961202

7 жыл бұрын

EDministrator where is the travelling on 10???? 😂😂😂😂😂

@EDgametr

7 жыл бұрын

Alexander Peykov lol I mean 12 :D

If you think these are bad you should see the AAU games in North Carolina

good stuff there

Wow....so many bad calls in one game

number 12 is not traveling man, am I wrong?????

@pepijnkleingeld6882

3 жыл бұрын

zhiming zhou No I think it is clean aswel

1 yes 2 no travelling 3 double doul 4 yes 5 yes 6 no foul 7 correct desicion 8 block foul 9 foul 10 no call 11 purple last touch 12 no travelling

This crew doesn’t look terrible. They appear to sell their calls. But their judgement appears to lack. I did like the communication on the OB play. None of these calls appeared correct to me.

Well, they got one call right.....

Semma explain 👌👌👌

1. Common foul 2. No call, play on. 3. Defensive foul, hold. Watch defensive players right hand. 4. Travel, dragged pivot foot 5. Good blocking call, defender was late 6. Foul 7. Correct no call 8. Flop/no call 9. No call, play on. Left foot stayed planted 10. Very little contact, I would have played on. 11. Purple ball 12. Travel, right pivot foot slid

@ianismanolache6110

Жыл бұрын

3- is offensive foul for sure

All in forms of questions, with no explanations

1. just a foul, 2. should have been a foul call on the purple team. 3. Off foul, 4. traveling, 5. it could be call either way. blocking or charging. however the ref see it. 6. it was another judgement call. i would let them play, but another ref might call a foul. 7. i wouldn't call technical foul, because i have no i deal what the coach said. 8. block foul. 9. traveling, 10. yes, got him with the body. 11. the refs to get together and ask each other what they say. where the two refs that done it, could not really saw anything. they just call a jump ball. 12. should have been call at the beginning of the drive.... way slow all the these down. the refs can't slow it down like that.

where are the right answers?

Hello I’m Malaysia and this is my decision but not really think I’m correct all of this 1. Unsportsmanlike foul no doubt 2. No Travel now in 2022 maybe a travel at that time 3. Double foul for me illegal screen for offensive player and defensive player hooking the screener hip 4. Travel pivot foot sliding a bit 5. First impression Offensive foul 6. I would say a jump ball 7. No travel for the play but the coach side maybe see the coach if he arguing aggressively using bad word, bad attitude or keep complaining and judging referee decision otherwise maybe just give him a warning first for me 8. White shirt offensive player are flop but maybe just let the game smoother no call for me and the purple shirt defensive player are blocking foul for sure 9. Before the travel it should be a foul from the defensive side and if got IRS that time at this match maybe can upgrade to unsportsmanlike foul for me 10. This foul for me if want let the game smoother it will not counted as the foul 11. I need to see IRS for this play only can make a decision for this play 12. Travel right foot sliding a bit

5 was a block

1. Unsportsmanlike 2. No call 3. Moving Screen 4. No call 5. Blocking foul 6. No call 7. Can't comment 8. No call 9. Travel 10. No call 11. Purple touched it last 12. Travel Lemme know what you think!!

1.Yes because the target was not the ball but the opposing player instead

no foul

traveling

I only believe 3 and 4

#9 he traveled twice

its a simple reach in foul on the move wow you guys r blind

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Good call 6. Its travelling 7. Yes 8. No call 9. Good call 10. Bad call 11. I dont know 12. Good call

hard foul

Nag tan aw ko ser sa atong U B L Ako d I c Daniel migduyan Jr,

#!1 shooting foul.--

@adomir19961202

7 жыл бұрын

last defender makes a contact from the left, passed from the offender and you believe it is only a shooting foul?

Wow! Lots of bad calls

Answers plz 2

they should only call fouls on players in the game no one off the court that simply solves that

All good calls

1 no unsportsmanlike, the ball has been gathered so it's a simple foul on the shot 2 no traveling 3 if called in time it's illegal screen, if the whistle come after the defender grab the blocker should be double foul but the first infraction it's an offensive foul 4 maybe, in the video it's impossible to see when he gather the ball 5 charging (this was defensive foul maybe in the 80s) 6 no way 7 there is really nothing happening here, I don't know what the white coach is arguing about, so the t foul is admissible 8 this is charging, but if you call defensive foul the 5 you must call the same for this 9 I'd say traveling because he is already out of control but the defender grab the shirt so the foul should be acceptable 10 this should never ever and never again called foul. There is no technical disadvantage on the shooter 11 I really don't care 12 the pivot foot slips forward so that's traveling

who's here because of the subject

Wowza. Some terrible calls were made.

4:00 min in and only 1 call has been right so far. Had to just stop watching. This is un-educational to see professional officials do such a poor job.

offensive charge this is basic stuff