you've literally earned my respect for vividness, simplicity, and a bit of comedy infused with wits. wish teachers were all like this man.

Premise: Richard will do a video next week Minor premise: it has been four years Conclusion: the video must be around here somewhere Somewhere

Richard, I teach logic and I love your presentation. It's accurate, easy to follow, and pleasant to view. I hope you make more like this.

This guy was years ahead with the timestamps

Thank you Richard, you are simply brilliant for simplifying the basics...I look forward for more videos from you.

Great, clear and simple introduction to logic.

I loved my logic and Latin classes in high school! I need to brush up on both! I went to a classical Christian high school.

i've been trying to understand this topic for weeks but i get so confused. this video somehow opened my third eye. thank you so much! bless you

Nice

for a graduate from UofT with such high achievements... you're an outlier and i like it

@richardmin8694

4 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

You are a great teacher. I subscribed, liked, and here is my comment. Hope the algorithm serves you well.

@richardmin8694

6 ай бұрын

Thank you!

Excellent explanations! Thank you!

Very clean and correct explication of Reason . Thank You :)

Thank you. Short and sweet explanations are the best.

I like ur English as well as ur video

very helpful, thanks!

@richardmin8694

Жыл бұрын

You're welcome!

thank you very much! you earned a like and a new subscriber :D I love the little Latin lesson at the end part haha , definitely gonna use that a lot in our debates.

Amazing video

Such clarity !! Thank you

Man thank you some much every one else complicating things

Your adorable! Old lady student here. Getting my bachelors in social work😌😉

thanks that was very informative and clearly explained. Also funny, great job!

Clear and well-explained. Well done. Also, top marks for using recycled paper.

Thanks❣️ it was great and clear. I have learned something today.

I understood what my professor was trying to explain in 3 classes in 6 minutes . thank you!

@richardmin8694

4 ай бұрын

Thank you! Glad it helped.

Amazing. Make more such

Thank you so much. God bless you and all

Great 👍

you teach so well thank you so much!!

Thanks, this will help with my final

very beautifully explained my friend. God bless

@richardmin8694

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

I hope you're a teacher because that explanation was exactly what I was looking for

Thanks! This helped me with my homework. I read many articles but being broken down and examples that you gave helped me.

@richardmin8694

8 ай бұрын

Thank you! Glad it helped.

thank you random asian man. you helped me get an A for my essay.

Richard, I love ur videos, I subscribed, like and here is my comment, I look forward for more videos

Hey...hope you are still alive

Amazing ❤

Thank you!

Best! Please keep teaching us!

@richardmin8694

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

Richard i miss you come back

We need more of this!!

@richardmin8694

9 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it.

I want more videos on Logic, please!

Hey brother, I've watched a couple of your videos and I want to know how did you study the laws of logic? I am very interested in learning logic, and one-day teaching others, but I want to know a good place to start.

This Video is So good

Hi! Just saw this. Thank you for the simple explanation. Hope you'll continue making videos about logic :)

@richardmin8694

2 жыл бұрын

you're welcome! Thanks for the encouragement! I plan to start again very soon.

@angelbau10

2 жыл бұрын

@@richardmin8694 Sure! Will definitely support it :)

Thank you for this

You must continue this channel

Amazing way of teaching. That is a very simple and concise way of delivering lectures even a shepherd can get it instantly. When I saw your channel history, there were only two videos unfortunately. I would like to suggest you to come back to your channel and work on it. Thanks.

@richardmin8694

Жыл бұрын

Thank you very much!

Nice!

This was good.

It's easy to understand!

Nice.

Your jawline is so sharp it could cut a tomato

@richardmin8694

Жыл бұрын

Lol thank you

🔥🐐💯

I like videos. This is a video. I like this

@richardmin8694

6 жыл бұрын

lol nice application

@diobrandon8649

5 жыл бұрын

lol

@miontorus

5 жыл бұрын

He likes videos. This was a video. He likes this.

Bout to have an exam few days from now, this video helps me a lot, hope you doing well after all these times

This is helpful

Thanks man

Thank you so much man 🙏 really appreciate it

@richardmin8694

Жыл бұрын

You're welcome!

Bro helped my homework

Epic

cool video dude SHEEESH

Great video. Succinct

Thanks for the video

@richardmin8694

3 жыл бұрын

thank you!

You are explaining better...make video on deductive logic and also on logical fallacies

Nothing is better than love. Potato chips are better than nothing. Therefore, potato chips are better than love.

Thanks

good

So, the second vid isn't still out. After 4 years. Hehe ))) Maybe someday soon? 🥰

@richardmin8694

Жыл бұрын

Haha I hope to do so relatively soon

@eng2grow

Жыл бұрын

@@richardmin8694 I've heard it somewhere... Lol. Good luck 🤞😃

Hello, I liked the video very much. Who is the quote he said at the beginning and what is it exactly? Can you write here?

@richardmin8694

3 жыл бұрын

Thank you! Isaac watts wrote the quote.

Can you recommend some good authors and books that help teach logic for homeschool kids?

А Вы в курсе, что уже разработана (аналогичная менделеевской) таблица для ЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ? (см. 07-04. ПЕРИОДИЧЕСКАЯ СИСТЕМА ЛОГИЧЕСКИХ ЭЛЕМЕНТОВ (ПСЛЭ): kzread.info/dash/bejne/hWWNqtiSdc_LpNI.html ) и составлен список из 32-х типов суждений, включающих два понятия (две логических переменных)? (07-05. ПОЛНАЯ СИСТЕМА СУЖДЕНИЙ СИЛЛОГИСТИКИ ПСЛО-2: kzread.info/dash/bejne/g4OhzKOtcbG1prQ.html ) А тут - о совместимости понятий: 06-09. АЛГЕБРАИЧЕСКИЙ РАСЧЁТ СИЛЛОГИЗМОВ - ЭТО ПРОСТО! (суждения, кванторы, модусы): kzread.info/dash/bejne/k2x1laaCadS7ibw.html :-)

How did I land here,

This guy faces discrimination in China for having those eyes

😮❤

2:30 tongue click

Have you read Prior Analytics by Aristotle?

@richardmin8694

4 жыл бұрын

no i have not. But I really should! I've read his categories and some logic textbooks from the 17th century.

Bob/cheeseburgers , 'conclusion' does not necessarily follow from given premise

It's so great when people smack their lips or make that kissing sound when they want to punctuate a thought. Good God damn it if this video wasn't right with such. Amen I hope you learn to make your point with fewer mouth noises then just the words. Thank you for posting this video though.

Make more videos bro

hi how can i contact this guy

You said questions are not propositions, but you proceeded to ask a proposition question "how are you"... Answer can be true or false = proposition.

This is really helpful, can I ask you a question? is this a syllogism? All A is caused by B Therefore all cases of B result in A Is this a specific type of faulty reasoning? Hope you can help me, thanks

@richardmin8694

3 жыл бұрын

I think it's better if you work with "if p, then q" format. The words "cause" and "case" can be ambiguous. "if p, then q. Affirm p, q follows." Syllogism requires 3 terms.

@angelnebula8278

3 жыл бұрын

thank you

@lauramartins5953

2 жыл бұрын

All A is caused by B, but that doesn't mean that B causes only A. B can cause things other than A, so it isn't true that "all cases of B result in A". It may or may not be true.

You are so pretty 😊

Good explanation but too simple for every other collegiate subject to use unfortunately.

and socrates is also dead now.

You need pictures in background.. lol

This sounds an awful like variable assignment and memory pointers in Computer science.

خلاصة كتاب الرد على المنطقيين لإبن تيمية : قسم ابن تيمية المنطق إلى قسمين : القسم الأول : المنطق البشري ، وهو الذي يعرفه الناس قبل ارسطوا . وهذا لا خلاف بين البشر جميعهم في صحته . القسم الثاني : المنطق الأرسطي ، وهو الذي ابتكره ارسطوا . والمنطق الذي ابتكره ارسطوا هو أمران فقط ؛ وهما : الأمر الأول : الحد المنطقي . الأمر الثاني : القياس المنطقي . وهذان الأمران هما الذان تكلم عليما ابن تيمية في كتابه الرد على المنطقيين . فقال في الرد على الحد المنطقي : أنه يستحيل أن يُعَرَّف شيء بالحد المنطقي . وقال في الرد على القياس المنطقي ، أنه قياس صحيح ، لكن طريقة الوصول به إلى المطلوب عَسِرة ، ويحتمل الوقوع في الخطأ بسبب عسره . وخير منه قياس التمثيل الذي يستخدمه الفقهاء في الإستدلال ، ويتكلم عليه الأصوليين في أصول الفقه ضمن الأدلة الشرعية..............

A premise is a proposition that logically proves or supports a conclusion Conclusion is a proposition that logically follows from the premise Argument consist of a premise and a conclusion Syllogism consists of 3 propositions Major: All men are mortal Minor: Socrates is a man Conclusion: therefore, Socrates is mortal Show one of the premises is false Show that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises Non sequitur - it does not follow Notes:

The claim that the fundemental difference between Humans and Animals is a claim frequently espouced. It's abjectly fallacious, though. First of all 'Humans' ARE animals, so the distinction you're making between the two is erroneous. But, HERE'S the interesting part. There was a Gorilla named Koko who gained considerable notoriety due to her impressively extstensive vocabulary that she communicated through 'Gorilla Sign Language'. It is said that her vocabulary exceeded 1, 000 words. The words were not exclusively nouns referencing tangible objects. She learned adjectives to express 'abstract' concepts. Ok... So... That may or may not impress you, BUT HOLD ON... THERE'S MORE! Her trainer was a Woman named Francine Patterson. I've seen some videos featuring the pair where Francine shares anecdotes and facts Re/ Koko's language comprehension. There was one video in particular that impressed me profoundly! The video may still be on KZread, so don't hesitate to search for it. In this video, Francine speaks of Koko's Unbievable Ability to concoct 'COMPOUND WORDS' to convey something for which she had no 'signs' for. For instance, one day, Francine gave Koko a cookie or some treat that was 'stale'. Koko did not have a 'sign' to denote 'stale', so she 'signed' 'rock' and then 'candy'. Another example was pertained to a ring that Francine was wearing. Koko wanted to reference it, but she had no 'sign' for 'ring', so she ingeniously 'signed' 'finger' and 'bracelet'. So... You may or not consider the rudimentary 'signing' to qualify as 'reasoning', but surely you concede that her ability to CREATE HER OWN COMPOUND WORDS is proof positive that she was indeed using reason. That unbelievable feat cannot be accomplished devoid of the ability to reason. So... there you have it. I also recall seeing a video of an Orangutan picking up a saw and sawing a wooden board in half. The narrator explicitly mentioned that the Orangutan had NEVER seen anyone use a saw before. This wasn't was case of 'Ape See, Ape Do'. The Orangutan analyzed the properties of the tool and effectively reasoned that it would be suitable for 'cutting' boards into pieces. You might say, 'I think the narrator was lying'. Theoretically? But, why? What does some unknown, random narrator stand to gain by lying? Nothing. So, we may as well take him at his word. I'm very confident that you can find even more videos on You Tube of our Closest Genetic cousins (Chimpanzees, Bonobos, Orangutans, and Gorillas employing simple reasoning methodologies in order to accomplish very practical and downright impressive things. To put things in perspective, there are literally hundreds of millions of severely retarded humans who lack the cognitive wherewithal to not only create Compound Words, but to speak at all. So, don't downplay the intellectual advances of our Great Ape cousins. Yes, Animals are capable of abstract thought and using reason.

Not bad. There is clearly a shortage of videos about the logic at the moment, maybe because it is not so popular nowadays. But don't repeat things twice. Don't repeat things twice.

@richardmin8694

5 жыл бұрын

I agree with you there. Thanks for the feedback!

Nice so we can use syllogisms to prove God's existence as true: *All words exist* *God is a word* *Therefore God exists* It is not necessary to know all the words in the world for my premise to be true: it only needs to be understood that if one knew all the words in existence then that would only prove the truth of my premise. The etmyology of _word_ is from Proto-Indo European (PIE) _*were-_ "speak, say", therefore whatever one is able to utter in speech and make statements about must exist. If we look at my syllogism another we can say: *If God doesn't exist then neither do atheists: because you cannot be against that which never existed in the first place* *If God doesn't exist then Judaism, Christianity, and Islam do not exist since they all lay claim to the Bible* Trying to separate God from reality and the Bible is like trying to separate water from hydrogen and oxygen: it just doesn't work.

what is the latin for Martin does follow? Martin wants to sound smarter than he is =P HHAHAHA i love it...

@richardmin8694

6 жыл бұрын

lol

Except why are all syllogism examples so fantastically stupid?

Latin is good for being pretentious 😂

This sentence is false.

I hate this word syllogism, it's so hard to pronouce.

😕 why be pretentious? 🙄 wouldn't that make the other person feel bad. 🫤 is that the point of 'winning the argument'?

Thanks man