Great video showing both Eva and Spider.

GREAT WORK BLESSINGS

They are both needed, please.

Someone askes about the Go!scan, please mail me at the contact info in about-page on my channel. I accidentally removed your comment (was removing my wrong answer) and KZread won't let me re-active it or see it...

What would you recommend for a starting point, perhaps used one?

Is there a tool what you can use for comparison two or more scan objects how much identical they are between each other?

I have the 3d scanner artec spider. I can scan a person with the spider? or should i have eva ??? What can I do to make a person? can I change the settings on artec ??

When working with an optical scanner, a problem arose-it does not remove the edge of a thin part, the overall size is hard to catch. How did you solve this problem?

Vi har både Eva och space spider och precis som du säger så är dom bra på olika saker. Eva funkar bra till hängande handdukar medan space spider funkar bäst till mindre statyer. Blir mycket bra detaljer med spidern.

Hi Anton! I have a question for you... assuming you are scanning an artifact the size of a human head using both the Eva and Spider at the highest resolution possible, how long does such a scan take? (Assuming we have a super powerful computer so that the PC hardware isn't really a limiting factor.) Thanks!

@3DPrintTechDesign

7 жыл бұрын

Well... I imagine you have a limiting time with the artifact and/or want to know what you should prepare the customer to pay? It's not that easy at all... First off, preparing the scanning object can take time, aligning, securing cords. Setting up markers if needed on or around the object. Preparation and planning on site could take 30-90 min maybe? depends on how you want to calculate. The scanning (having the scanners blink) might be around 5-45 min for the spider (it performs best after 30 mins warm-up-scanning) and max. 5 min with the EVA, assuming you did good planning. So this means you have to decide if you want that accuracy that a run-in Spider offers, or if you're happy with the accuracy of a "cold" one. So yes, the spider is a bit slower, specially if you want to pre-heat/warm-up. Again, being time-efficient you can cut that down by doing it while preparing the object/setup... Difficult to say ;). Then don't forget to calculate the steps of securing data. With the spider you have more data and more details to go through before you can leave the scene with a good confidence. Soo.. to answer your question. Just looking at scanning the object and not calculating anything else, it's about 3-5 min for Artec EVA, and 5-15 min with a "cold" regular Artec Spider. Did that make sense? ;)

@crackyhoss

7 жыл бұрын

This is very helpful, thank you!

I wondering which one is better for our company... We need scan smaller objects and bigger ones, take measurements of objects and put 3D models to new desings.

Which one do you recommend for nice antiques ?

@3DPrintTechDesign

9 ай бұрын

Would depend on the size of the object. I think the aftec Leo would be a better generic scanner alternative when shopping for a scanner that handles different sizes. But up to 75cm cubed, the spider is at best.

I like the detail that the Spider can achieve, but I want to scan whole people in order to make scale models. At somewhere around $25,000 for one or other of these machines, it is impossible for a single person, rather than a big company, to purchase either of these. I hope the price drops significantly in years the future, so that they become more affordable.

@3DPrintTechDesign

5 жыл бұрын

To scan complete persons I'd still go with the Artec EVA or the new Artec LEO. The Spider is better at details, but if you're scaling down, I'm confident the Artec EVA will do you well. If you haven't, ask for a demo at a local reseller and get the files so you can scale down and have a look!

Thanks a lot, nice video, I have a question, what does prevent us to scan a real car for example ? can't I scan a car size stuff with one of these?

@3DPrintTechDesign

2 жыл бұрын

Great question! So, using the Artec Spider, it focuses on a smaller field of view per frame scanned, which is also why it's capturing more data per square centimeter for example. So if you would scan 1x1m area, it would be a ton of data to process. Scanning a car would be several Square meters and too much data for any computer (or the algorithms themselves) to handle. But that's actually not the biggest issue. Slippage, or percentage-error happens between every frame. Basically, the precision the software/scanner have to calculate where one frame is compared to the other is only "99,5%" correct. meaning that if you scan enough frames, that "0,5%" slippage between each frame will be enough to throw your scan off. For example, if you scan around the car, when you meet the old scan, you might be way of (we're talking several millimeters/centimeters) depending on scanner. Artec Eva has a listed "0.3 mm/m" deviation. that's in a optimal scenario with probably a "straight" scan in one direction.

@fardin5059

2 жыл бұрын

@@3DPrintTechDesign Thanks so much for your answer. it seems it is not like "getting a scanner and there we are" and befor I get a scanner there are things to learn.

@3DPrintTechDesign

2 жыл бұрын

Oh there is tons to consider! Please talk to a reseller, or manufacturers. Figure out what you need and how to use the data 👍

@fardin5059

2 жыл бұрын

@@3DPrintTechDesign Yes, I must. Thanks.

Hello Anton. Very nice video. I must Scan a car. What is the best option now in the market for the price range. And do you think that doing it with the Kinekt V2 would do a good job?

@3DPrintTechDesign

7 жыл бұрын

Hi Luiz, What are you using the data for? What's the goal with the scan? Usually a Kinekt V2 wont do the job. Atleast not for most applications. Do you have a budget as well?

Have mache is the Eva?

@3DPrintTechDesign

2 жыл бұрын

It's around 13700€ for the full texture version. The EVA lite, without texture is around half that I think.

Cost/

$30,000 worth of scanning hardware....

The whole 3D Scanning industry is weird. The equipment is grotesquely expensive and there are no scanners with software designed to work on Mac. This forces me to buy another computer. Been searching for over a month now and the best I can find is the Einscan pro 2+ at $8,000 and there isn't much else to chose from that doesn't start at $10,000. Yes there are still cheaper units and cheaper Einscans but they are older models and not likely to produce satisfactory results. Overall I'm very disappointed in the industry. You can do better.

@namm0x326

3 жыл бұрын

Focused mostly on businesses and the software and hardware needed isn't particularly easy to build, especially at the relatively low volumes of the market. You also need a very powerful computer, I hope you have nothing short of an imac pro or maybe a souped up (max ram cpu and gpu spec) 27" from at least 2017 to even get the computing power needed if you find a way to run it on mac.