I’m in the national guard and my particular unit is being disbanded and reorganized into a focused artillery unit in next 3 years. As I’m only a SPC, I am not able to really elaborate more about the details however this video explains why this is happening and in fact gives me a great deal of comfort knowing our army has not lost it’s edge in being the most advanced fighting force and the future’s security shall be maintained. I am even considering requesting through my coc that this video be presented to everyone in the battery cuz it made me want to extend my contact so that I can witness and be a part of the Army 2030. Definitely inspiring!

@Legionare

Жыл бұрын

"Lost its edge"? Just ask a Pashtun

@MarcosElMalo2

Жыл бұрын

@@Legionare Cope, seditionist and/or Ivan.

@tonyaughney8945

Жыл бұрын

All that and you're going to be sacrificed in a needless war for israel.

@johnd2058

9 ай бұрын

From a vet: hoo-ah, high-speed!

Very insightful! It’ll be interesting to see how these changes affect training and missions, specially training in garrison

Multiple, simultaneous, devastating, defensive, deep strikes!

We will learn a lot ! Thank you from Bulgaria !

Great info

Shoutout from NCD & NAFO, we are SO h... stood up right now!

I am glad that i have ARMY 2030 and strategy that guide me to winning good future.

Nice concept.

1:00 Not sure I like the US Army's predictions for the UK and particularly Wales in 2030 😱

Poor old Wales, didn't stand a chance

Myfamily loving

It is way point 2028. I want to see waypoint 2030's new organization.

My mind flying back to every war I've studied that mentions the generals fighting that previous war. Let's all hope we don't discover if this quilt and his ilk are evolutionary geniuses! 😂

I like This. Nice🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍

I’m terrified to see how bad the army of 2030 will be

NoP satellite wars, let’s go!

8:33 oof, made it half-way before I couldn't ignore that this is Pooling 2.0: AI boogaloo (tongue-in-cheek reference to a similar doctrine we used going into WWII, only to stop using it on first contact because of conditions on the ground. Lets not make the same mistake hoping AI and superior ISR will save us this time?) I would highly encourage developing TTPs that enable and empower Company-level commanders to maintain initiative with organic (not assigned) material and manpower across this new spectrum of warfare. This was part of our lessons-learned from WWII, Vietnam, and even the most recent OEF and OIF. It would ideally include material and manpower to conduct ISR, process, proliferate up and across, identify vulnerabilities, and exploit those to accomplish a dynamic piece of the commander's objective within scope of the domains available to the unit to action safely. A practical analogy to this would be soldiers deciding to become a step so another can vault a wall vs needing an officer to assign specific soldiers to be the steps and another to be helped up. The first example shows soldiers who share a common mission who communicate among themselves efficiently to negotiate how to approach and clear the obstacle. ISR, processing, and decisioning is collaborative and self-auditing with accomplishing the goal in mind. The second example centralizes ISR, processing, and decision-making, which ensures efficient use of limited resources, but has a single point of failure. Our maneuver elements will need to approach the level of intuitive cooperation shown in the first example in order to maintain the advantages of multi-domain warfare when comms inevitably get disrupted and units find themselves cut off from a very vertical command structure.

So whatever is happening is going to happen by 2030?

This wets my noodle

@acegentry9151

Жыл бұрын

Crossing This Video Made My Gap Wet

As much as I love having access to this stuff I hope it’s not teaching our enemies how to actually be good.

Love seeing the retired/discharged and boarded former members in the chat rant on things they're not read in on nor understand. Keep up the internet trolling while you complain at the VA, thank you for your 2-3 years of service, your opinion is valuable...

@OakInch

Жыл бұрын

That wasn't actually a defense of this awful PR video. The first thing you should have noticed in this "reorg" was the complete lack of numbers or actual capabilities given on any topic. This video was made for people who don't know anything about anything, and only they would attempt to defend it.

@brdd514

Жыл бұрын

@@OakInch That’s what manuals are for.. literally… hundreds of pages explaining in detail… The video is an intro, a preface, that thing you read at the beginning of a manual. It’s purpose wasn’t to spoon feed you everything, because that’s on you to do your own reading. Whether it’s at ILE or on your own. (Insert Reading Rainbow Music)

@OakInch

Жыл бұрын

@@brdd514 Your entire defense of this video is an admission that it is as uninformative and PR centric as everyone says it is. There is no doubt in my mind I would have to look elsewhere for any actual information. I rest my case.

@brdd514

Жыл бұрын

@@OakInch then why are you ripping on it? We agree it’s an intro, not suppose to have details. Were you expecting detail? Are you mad it’s didn’t have detail? Did you think they’d publicly release a video with detailed information? And that they’d sum it up in 15min? Why are you mad about it not meeting your unrealistic expectations? Are you that out of touch?

@jerrymiller9039

Жыл бұрын

Better than yours

1:49 that place got shot up? They made such good chicken shawarma there.

Infantry loves rainy situations

US army is very capable at proposing new theory, while PLA is very capable at making that from PPT to reality.

Nucklear submarines🇺🇸 important. İnşallah kullanmak zorunda kalmayız.

Probaly will be over budget and severely behind schedule if its not killed off by the lack of public will to fight another "forever war" or whatever near-peer means now.

@Charles-pf7zy

10 ай бұрын

People said the same thing when the army reorganized in the 70s after the vietnam disaster

We are using Aı good thinks. Medical, brain, future defense big operations. Dont worry we are good 🇺🇸people. Thanks🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 ❤👍

Decision Centric. Multi-Domain::OPERATION KONCKEPTSS.

@Doug-ki6ob

Жыл бұрын

NationalReserves...go...go...go

So US Army in 2030 will turn from ABCTs to Divisions to deal with threaths probably this divisions will be sent to europe in Poland and will be strongest power for Nato Response Forces to deal russian agression

@vatodanelia5411

2 жыл бұрын

But how can armu deal with such competition with 14 ABCTs which 4 arme from NG much more armoured brigades are neccesary to become more lethal force

@Dhouston1125

Жыл бұрын

NATO is the aggressor.

@MarcosElMalo2

Жыл бұрын

@@vatodanelia5411 I’ll point out three things: 1) NATO is defensive in nature and it’s deterrence value has always been its collective coordination. Forward stationed U.S. units have been a numerically small component for a while now. Not numerically insignificant, but not the bulk of forces protecting Europe. 2) The Russian threat is diminishing itself on a daily basis. The Red Army is a shadow of a shadow of its former self. 3) NATO is becoming less dependent on the U.S. at the same time it is experiencing a revival. This last point is a good thing for both the countries of Europe and the U.S. With Russia so weakened, the U.S. doesn’t have to be Europe’s shield (other than for nuclear deterrence and to a certain extent, air power).

@bermanmo6237

8 ай бұрын

Task and Purpose had a similar webcast called Pentration Division that had some of the same graphics.

@bermanmo6237

8 ай бұрын

Sorry, it is Battle Order

What happens if/when Murphy’s Law kicks in and this complex interconnected system breaks down, partly or even entirely? Hopefully, all this otherwise justifiable sophistication is not creating more potential for its many components to be essentially blind and helpless if something like a decapitation strike occurs. I assume we cannot simply try to power cycle this impressive system of systems for a reboot lol.

@Legionare

Жыл бұрын

Like when China knocks out a few of our satellites ?

@Charles-pf7zy

10 ай бұрын

Your exact question could have pertained to any time in history a military has reorganized. F

What a mess. One good crisis and all of this fragility falls like a piece of cards.

Ambitious or..?

Without quality people coming in droves to the recruitment offices, this awesome and ambitious plan may collapse from there being too few hands to support its establishment, internalisation and longterm martial enculturation of expert readiness. If the American economy should soon collapse further into recession and, God forbid, into outright depression (what, with the knee capping economic effect ballooning inflation and all) it may be possible that young people actually will enlist en mass just for the sake of a steady paycheck (+ benefits) and to offset their chances of university loan debt traps. And as for those of officer material (or at least those possessing a BA or nearly), the same could be said.

@Dhouston1125

Жыл бұрын

exactly - whites have woken up and will not again fight for ZOG

Pls heroes commanders add Aİ plan b🇺🇸😉👍

Why would you tell your enemies your future strategic goals and layout all your capabilities and to make it worst write it on a pamphlet to teach the enemies all that you have done and going to do? All this sharing of information just advanced your enemies capabilities and they're already working on technologies to counter everything yall just said... and then we wonder why our enemies are so advanced...

@Charles-pf7zy

10 ай бұрын

Field manuals have existed in western militaries for hundreds of years. The crucial details are classified. Being completely silent and refusing to engage with the public is a show of weakness and degrades the militaries goal of deterrence. That’s why China shows off every new toy in their military parades. Beating your chest is part of the game.

@beaumontgile5886

6 ай бұрын

They aren't telling them anything they don't want them to know or can use against them....they have teams of people who just go through possible angels against them all day all the time

Pls tell nato they are work different war tactics. Birimiz olmazsa öbürüsü hem şaşırtır(sağ gösterip sol vururuz)hemde de daha kolay kazanırız. R thanks🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 and Nato👍

Division size cant compete with peer brigade competers

Back to WWII. BCT = RCT.

Does army have any ammo left usa no industrial base left

@MarcosElMalo2

Жыл бұрын

Incorrect, Ivan. Check your facts before making blanket assertions.

@teeheeteeheeish

Жыл бұрын

Its about the only thing that we do still make

@origamimambo545

Жыл бұрын

Sure Boris, America is not like the drunks in Russia.

@Charles-pf7zy

10 ай бұрын

You have no idea world trade exists

Can drones and hypersonic missiles defeat usa army

@MarcosElMalo2

Жыл бұрын

No, Ivan.

@Charles-pf7zy

10 ай бұрын

Only if they stand in place and behave predictably like ai soldiers in a video game

@PochoNieves

6 күн бұрын

Hypersonic missiles are very expensive and are mainly for sea power. They can be adapt to ground but again very expensive and it doesn't make sense for ground campaigns. Drones can only carry so much payload and can be easily disrupted by EW.

You can organize your army as much as you want if you don't have the massive industrial manufacturing capacity base to mass produce equipment and ammunition to back it up in a peer to peer conflict that army is as good as dead in a long term peer to peer conflict. Right now you are spending $1 Trillion a year in your military and yet you are getting completely out manufactured by the Russians in ammunition and equipment even though they are only spending 1/10 of your military budget. Conclusion, Your military, and all your fancy high tech equipment, is meant to make money for defense contractors, nor fight and win wars. Furthermore, all your branches except the Marines corps are struggling to recruit personnel. A country's true military strength is not the strength of its armed forces, but it's industrial capacity base to mass produce equipment and ammunition in a very short amount of time and it's ability to mobilize huge amounts of men for military forces. Your equipment is over priced, your industrial manufacturing base is unable to mass produce large amounts of ammunition and equipment and you struggle to recruiting personnel. That is not sign of strength. That is a huge sign of weakness. In a peer to peer conflict you will lose huge amounts of equipment and men. You can have the shiniest most sophisticated equipment in the world you can't replace both your equipment and recruit in large quantities you are in deep 💩. Just some food for thought there.

Can army fight a conventional war if all satellites are jam

Clearly the Army isn’t ready for near peer conflict. Let’s hope this changes before we take unnecessary casualties for no reason because of old thinking, poor strategies & fighting yesterdays wars

Need lots of artillery like the russians

@MarcosElMalo2

Жыл бұрын

The U.S. doesn’t want to fight long protracted wars like Russia is doing, stuck in Ukraine. Air power gets the job done quicker. Thanks for playing, Ivan.

Infantry need 26 weeks good training get fat guy join 300 lb

2030 Great Reset

During vietnam war army poor traing

Bro, I can’t take this seriously. Watching this video be like another futuristic take from the army that never comes to fruition. “On Demand Resupply” 🤣🤣🤣. What is this? Squad? Amazon Prime? The Army & pentagon loves selling these programs that aren’t battlefield tested that will fail because someone gets a major kickback

@Sweetpuffmuffin

Жыл бұрын

On Demand Resupply is not a fantasy concept? There are multiple different technologies that could manage that in the future.

It is clearly Russia you mention when talking about great power adversary 😅 What happened with LGBTQ+ US army, why there were no transgender super soldiers in this video? 😂

On a non-technical note, one hopes the recent surge in wokeness and affirmative action does not lead to a decay in human capital quality, especially in the face of China's extremely competitive and ability determined selection process.

@catzor4795

Жыл бұрын

Slav vatnig bot.

@origamimambo545

Жыл бұрын

Your racist and sexist assumptions that only white eighteen year old boys can be effective warriors is just nut job propaganda. I'll still bet on our military over any others. Including the Chinese who have only fought war games unlike Americans.

what if the theatre commander is neither he or she? you excluded big part of the army, bigot!

@catzor4795

Жыл бұрын

Haha, low IQ vatnik.

More importantly fight the wokeness

parting#samuel post @