OMG, the military jargon has exploded into multilayered multisyllabic multidimensional fubar.

1:45 - I knew from that image alone that the Objective Cat was to be the Sahrani Airfield

@RHphoto

3 жыл бұрын

Being both in the Army and an avid ArmA player throughout the years, these videos are a treat.

@C.Brock3rdID

3 жыл бұрын

SLA is back and Queen Isabella is feeling the pressure...

@jkfilms6738

3 жыл бұрын

@@RHphoto I absolutely agree.

4:32 - Wait I thought the Army was no longer using the XM-25. Let alone in 2028.

@Cain-x

3 жыл бұрын

It is a shame too since it was a game changer for those who wielded it in Afghanistan. Engagement time were reduced significantly and no casualties during the time they were engaged with the weapon.

@Cain-x

3 жыл бұрын

@A dude with a flashlight There was a reported accident where the gun blew up and there were lingering reliability issues so they canceled the program. Funny enough, a new request for a similar gun is being sought by the Army.

@Trve_Kvlt

2 жыл бұрын

@@Cain-x It was also heavy, cumbersome, and a general pain in the ass to carry around. It quickly became something you just throw in the back of a humvee instead of carrying it around, like the AT4, Carl Gustav, etc. But I mean, when it worked it worked really well.

@theimmortal4718

2 жыл бұрын

That thing was a piece of junk. Airburst 84mm rounds are much more useful, on a proven weapon

Man, looks like Sahrani is in turmoil again.

Great video! Glad to see more content rolling out. Love it.

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

This is outstanding, thank you for your service.

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

Love the sendup to OP FP faces on "Atropian" Soldiers! Heart.

You are Excellent in your field.

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

So we're going to call our drones "Air Small Systems"? ASS? [EDIT]: Okay, now I know this is pure fantasy. I can tell because: 1. Soldiers riding on bench troop seats in the back of the open-topped Light Infantry Vehicle; not strapped down with Reflective belts. I could sense the disturbance in the Force as the entire corps of Us Army Sergeants-Major choked on their toaster strudels when they saw that. 2. An infantry rifle that is *not* an M16 variant. *It will never happen*. Otherwise pretty cool.

@thejetace42

2 жыл бұрын

Bro on the infantry rifle that is not the m16 variant is real bro and being advocated for the us milltary check the ngsw XM5 AND XM250

@ironstarofmordian7098

2 жыл бұрын

This aged well. Lol.

@Knight_Kin

Жыл бұрын

It's literally all happening, built and developed. It'll be years before it comes up to scale but it looks well apace.

@randomcoyote8807

Жыл бұрын

@@Knight_Kin Very true... but after decades of false promises, I won't fully believe it until the armorer is shoving a brand-new rifle into my sticky little fingers and making me sign for it. XD

An American IBCT from 2028 fighting a Russian battalion from 1994 doesn't seem like a particularly interesting comparison.

@s0r1ns3c

2 жыл бұрын

Well they’re not exactly meant to face a Russian motor rifle brigade head-on. Thats the ABCT’s job. IBCT’s are meant for low intensity stuff like this

@OrDuneStudios

Жыл бұрын

Well its downrigjt unfair to the russians for a modern one See ukraine war.

@sigis72

10 ай бұрын

it's realistic though. Russia, if it will still exist, will be extremely degraded and will have technologically regressed by 2028. They are already fighting with restored museum inventory. It's more like 1894-1964 equipment

@CheapSushi

7 ай бұрын

I'm surprised they weren't using modernized Chinese forces since that's what I thought the US was preparing for.

@nanzistnt2573

3 ай бұрын

I cant fathom how deeply delusional people must be to think Russia is a inept, outdated military when theyre pushing Ukraine to collapse and causing NATO to freakout on military and civilian fronts (economic/industrial capabilities).

bruh this is just mods added into an ARMA 2 scenario

@Allmightygreat

10 ай бұрын

You Fr?

@SIickTurtIe

9 ай бұрын

I read that For simulation training, the army literally uses software made by the same company that develops Arma, soo…

@antoniochalking

6 ай бұрын

@@SIickTurtIe there is a video of Chinese troops using Arma 3 to train lol

@dododostenfiftyseven4096

4 ай бұрын

What do you expect? It’s just a video showing the troops while the audio describes the plan.

@rifqitaqiuddin

3 ай бұрын

You are not wrong. Specifically, its VBS3 simulations made by Bohemia interactive for US armed forces, based on arma2 engine.

So even in 2028... The Marines must still at least take, secure, and hold, a beachhead. That's great news.

@flyoptimum

12 күн бұрын

The Army had 22 Divisions in the Pacific during WWII. The Marines had only 6. The largest contested beach landing in history happened at Normandy, with zero Marines present. There were more than twice as many Army divisions than Marine divisions present at Okinawa. Half the US regiments involved in the Inchon landings in the Korean war were US Army. The Marines' most famous victory at Iwo Jima still had an Army regiment present with them. The list goes on, and on, and on. So, sorry ace, the myth of the Marines coming ashore on a contested beach being something unique to them is an utter fantasy. The Army has done it more often, on a larger scale and completely without the Marine's support, which is something the Marines never accomplished without the Army. All that said, The Marines are largely abandoning the contested beach landing as a viable tactic because modern weapons have made it far too costly a venture. The Navy is moving towards a much smaller Marine Corps focused on seizing uncontested littorals, setting up and protecting air defense and long range precision fires to make space for the Navy's ships closer to the shore. It seems like a good mission for them and fills a critical need as blue water vessels become more vulnerable to long range shore based weapons. That said, by its very design, will attempt to keep the Marines away from combat, not fling them into it, so thump your chest a little softer m'kay?

Hvala dzstduet

I wish I could make something similar for the Civil Affairs BN CMOC & CIM

Can the army also field the new ABCDEFG IFV?

Cool!!!

nice!!!

Near peers defending positions with a technical. Don't worry guys, call up our next gen tank.

You use a version of Arma for this right? I recognize it anywhere,

Where is field artillery?

The updated East Germans didn't stand a chance.

THX the video! Which program was used to create the animations?

@FirstDagger

Жыл бұрын

VBS (Virtual Battlespace), you might be familiar with Bohemia Interactive's Armed Assault series of games this is based on.

We were told that as a brigade we were expected to kill a division before we died. So 3-4 times our size. To break even we had to kill 4 tanks for every one we lost. So far our kill ratio is about 25 to 1. That is a hell of a kill ratio.

I love this game

Ayeee I need those Aim Bot Eye Pro sent to my Unit ASAP!!

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

@scottc1857

3 жыл бұрын

Ivas? They're amazing... And cheap comparatively. Plus at least 100 degree fov color NV with thermal overlay

@scottc1857

3 жыл бұрын

Oh they're also lighter than envgb

Looking forward to what the US Army sees as the future for ABCTs, another video/O&O coming soon?

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

This strategy game looks neat. I wanna play 😀

@FirstDagger

Жыл бұрын

You can, VBS is the commercial version of Bohemia Interactive's Armed Assault series.

This would be appreciated to see in total war 🤷🏽‍♂️😂. Otherwise it looks cool

Send some To the anchorage units please

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

I'll be 16 Year in by then & more settle in a SBCT then a IBCT too

This is arma right?

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

Cool! No one ever shoots back.

Aren't those French army at 0:43?

Very nice demo. What would be REALLY cool would be throwing these hypothetical/new weapon systems into a game like Squad or Arma III and see how players use them. Could get some interesting insight before any time and money is spent building them.

@EvilTwinn

3 жыл бұрын

The program these visuals are from is the military version of Arma. Believe me when I say they already have. Additionally, Arma groups are too small to really have a lot of this stuff become a factor, this from a guy who plays platoon sized operations in Arma 3 every other week. You need to go to at least battalion level for most of this to be remotely relevant.

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

@@EvilTwinn kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

@gardnert1

3 жыл бұрын

@@EvilTwinn Very interesting. I think perhaps the Army should invest more in that kind of virtual training for actual personnel. Would kill two birds with one stone! As a member of the Army, I've always thought realistic FPS games like those I mentioned would be extremely effective training for certain aspects, namely communication and tactics. It'd basically be the equivalent of a flight sim like pilots use.

@EvilTwinn

3 жыл бұрын

@@gardnert1 Yeah, virtual training is undoubtedly the way of the future, the problem is coming up with ways for it to be as relevant for the infantryman as they want it to be and as economical as they'd like. Perhaps VR headsets can help with that at some point.

@BicyclesMayUseFullLane

3 жыл бұрын

​@@gardnert1 I mean, you are already seeing it. It's VBS 3, a "training simulator" built on top of the engine (Real Virtuality 3) that runs ArmA 2 (last time I checked anyway). One of the problem is that up until recent versions of ArmA3 (Real Virtuality 4), the control scheme is really clunky. Hell, even with improvement in controls and animations, it's still pretty awful. And I doubt "they" have backported the improvements back to VBS 3, given that BIS and BISim have officially separated. And because all o this training is obviously done on government computers, you can't have Joe messing around with settings, which means they are stuck with (I kid you not) controls and animations inherited straight from 2001. So what will end up happening is that you are forcing bunch of Joes to play a "video game" that has crap graphics, clunky animation that gets in the way (e.g. your virtual avatar insists on walking forward while throwing grenade because the walking animation doesn't stop even after you stopped pressing the forward key), awful control scheme that they are not familiar with, all while going through a scenario that is completely divorced from reality. The Joes will not care and get hemmed up, and entire training day was wasted. And at the end of the day, they'll go back to their barracks and play the newest version of Call of Battlefield Honor with fancy graphics, silky smooth animations and controls. And maybe, just maybe, some of them are motivated enough to play ArmA 3 (which has relatively modern graphics, animations, and controls) with a few realism mods (e.g. ACE3, ACRE2) with similarly motivated people online (whom may or may not even be in the military), and unironically get better training from that than whatever VBS 3 could offer. Let's not even mention "America's Army", which was another can of worms lol.

versatility & survivability of ground elements of IBCT are of paramount importance!!! especially the tactical capabilities in a unified network centric warfare!!! JLTV ain't suitable for this scenario!!! rather the AM GENERAL BRV-O® i-HYBRID 4WD + 5.0 in. Lift 6.3 TDI V8 / 90.0 kWh E-DRIVE 4-Dr Armoured Infantry Scout Vehicle (LHD) is a more appropriate ground mobility asset!!! armed with roof mounted 23 MM GAU-23/E rotary cannon & .50 Cal on a standard issue RWS, it could be absolutely lethal on the enemy!!!

Why you need MPF with the IBCT when you have Stryker IBCT?

@seanmac1793

2 жыл бұрын

To give the light formations more punch

@ht-sneakers80

2 жыл бұрын

@@seanmac1793 That's why we have Stryker brigade combat teams. Strykers can be equipped with 30mm cannon or the 105mm cannon. I have seen them in action in Iraq.

@seanmac1793

2 жыл бұрын

@@ht-sneakers80 because there are different standards for strategic airlift time and requirements. I can't remenber the exact numbers but IBCT supposed to a faster call in with less restrictions on airfield size

@OrDuneStudios

Жыл бұрын

@@ht-sneakers80 105mm has be retired. And this is Light Infantry with only a single Bn of tracks. So much more strategicly mobile.

oh boy oh boy a trolling we a going 🤜🏽🤛🏽

So the "enemy" doesnt have support battalions, artillery, drones, arial support, proper counterattack etc. Yeah you should have added nuclear strike in attacking force arsenal too since its so much fantasy

@audigex

Жыл бұрын

Yeah this is a brigade vs a batallion, for some reason? And the brigade has plenty of armor (despite being air-dropped nearby) but the "home team" doesn't have so much as a single tank? It's nonsense, may as well show a tiger beating up a puppy

They forgot to show cases of beer being dropped for the troops.

The ISV sure looks a lot like a puma…

Hold up that thumbnail is from arma 3

That 'IBCT' seems to have quite a bit of heavy armor...

@ht-sneakers80

2 жыл бұрын

That’s what I’m saying, that’s why the Army created the Stryker BCT to fill in the gap between a light infantry regiment and a armored regiment. Stryker = Fast mobile & a little fire power.

@paratrooper629

7 ай бұрын

One company of Mobile protected firepower 14 light tanks . For direct fire support to the Infantry. Not meant to go toe to toe with T-80s, 90s etc. Army selected GDLS MPF and is designated the M10 Booker. Given a long drawn out slugfest with Russia, China, Iran, Norks- take your pick of combos, the Army should also get the M8 Buford Armored gun system/ MPF, light tanks .

What about the enemy's mines and tanks? Not realistic

@coreyjacobs2718

2 жыл бұрын

The idea would be that those are taken care of by the airforce this would be mop up

I knew something seemed off by the video's picture, looks like fucking Arma...

5:10 is this Arma ???

@FirstDagger

Жыл бұрын

VBS (Virtual Battlespace), the military version of the software based on Armed Assault.

No Armor or Weapons.... sounds like a great idea

You don't mix tracked vehicles with light forces no matter how 'light' they are. You're either light or heavy.

@coreyjacobs2718

2 жыл бұрын

That is the whole point of having mpf its a light tank like the old sheridans

@username_3715

2 жыл бұрын

@@coreyjacobs2718 not c130 transportable, not air droppable, not sling loadable, not amphibious, so all of the fights it can get to, you could bring actual tanks.

@Knight_Kin

Жыл бұрын

@@username_3715 False, you can air transport 2 of them on a c130. It's the "General Dynamics Griffin II" that was selected as the new light tank MPF. It's 38 tons unlike the Abrams which is much heavier. The Army will have about 100 of them by the end of next year (end of 2023).

@username_3715

Жыл бұрын

​@@Knight_Kin you can fit 2 on a c 17. a c130 cantfit these or take off even if it could, their max load is like 20 tons.

Ok what the fuck is on the back deck of the light tank? That black R2-D2 looking thing? Anyone?

@Knight_Kin

Жыл бұрын

No idea, it's not on the real deal Griffin II tank.

why not just use Arma III for these videos, it'd turn out so much better

It's literally a Stryker BCT but with pickup trucks and shitty expensive, "assault rifles" that are really just battle rifles, thus throwing away everything that we've learned from decades of combat experience: "precision fire is a meme. Suppression fire wins the day, every day." I'll take my Stryker that can transport my squad WITH armor and firepower over fucking pickup trucks and MRAPs that flip over going offroad with horrible troop dismount ratios please. Thanks a lot military industrial complex for making even more useless shit we don't need for 4x the price it should be.

@steveaustin2686

2 жыл бұрын

Apparently, the Standard Division, Heavy will have Stryker BCTs and the Standard Divsion, Light is leg infantry with motorized transport. Evidently, they won't fight from the ISVs, but will dismount short of the objective to advance on foot. Now, whether that will happen in actual pratice, is something I doubt.

China: we copy that..

first,nice video

@user-vn4uv4zu5f

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/fZyKxNRpf9ynf6g.html

The MPF looks like a Panther...

Literally ARMA 1 lol

And yet none of this has been practiced in the field. Still stuck on insurgent doctrine, with a static FLOT.

To anybody watching that thinks about joining if your qualified just do it . This video is all non sense you most likely won't get to do any of these cool things in the video and might be sent to war with a broken weapon and have to buy your own sling with your own money. The reason is you will get to do stuff not in the video that will stay with you for your life . Also you get to retire at 20 years with a pension at 39 years old .

Mts mogu i kakvisufuj al stazio i eho itd hihihi

Looks like they're fighting the Chinese 😂😂😂 Taiwan conflict maybe????

None of this gear will make any difference if we keep doing the fighting an unwinnable war thing people won't keep enlisting for that shit either by the way

the camouflage of enemy soldiers is chinese and tanks are russian. lol. copy that.

@TheSynchronizer

3 жыл бұрын

No it's not, that's russian Flora or VSR one of the two from the 80s

@unitednationscommand9356

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheSynchronizer copy that

Bro if you think Cav scouts are going to ride in that death box you're high. WTF is that thing? StrykerX and StrykerX dragoon > LRV GTFO of here with that nonsense.

New COD looks like crap

China is stronger 🇨🇳 The dragon will awaken and eat the eagle

@jaystol7988

2 жыл бұрын

cool story

Certified “meh” Uninteresting and out of touch