I have been praying for Armenians. Our friends that Armenians are the most wonderful generous people and we love them. Can't wait to hear what you have.❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

I have Basque ancestry! Respect and love to my Armenian family.

@TenTenJ

2 жыл бұрын

Wonderful!

@briansaul4707

2 жыл бұрын

Not sure where this was presented, but I'm a bit surprised that nothing was mentioned about Fresno, California where there have been relatively large concentrations of both Basques and Armenians for many, many years. Coincidence, I suppose, but notable at the same time.

@TenTenJ

2 жыл бұрын

@@briansaul4707 that’s amazing, I had no idea! I have to learn more about that. Are you from that area? Do you notice the similarities between them?

@NA-nf2mf

2 жыл бұрын

Blessings to you, dear brother !

@jenniferirwin82

Жыл бұрын

Proud to have Basque ancestry as well. Still learning about the Basque People. 😍🙂

I’m half Armenian and a quarter basque! Love the connection!

@moonsquatch4478

2 жыл бұрын

DNA definitely adds some credit to the claims eh?

@vgjl1824

2 жыл бұрын

And im basque with hungarian ancestry! Love the connection!

@onlythetruth4039

2 жыл бұрын

@@vgjl1824 Hungarians are Turkic Huns, Avars mixed with Germanic Goths. Connection is there but weaker than the Basque/Armenian connection.

@vgjl1824

2 жыл бұрын

@@onlythetruth4039 Im basque man, what are you saying about mu ethnicity? We are more european than the germans and english peoples, we are PRE indo-european, 100% europeans, but i have hungarian ancestry, the magiars mixed with slavs

Am I Armenian too ? Vahan Setyan looks the spitting image in hair and face colour, as my grandfather! I am in Mid-Wales, but Grandad was from the south. I also cannot help wondering if Vahan is a form of the Welsh name Vaughan !

@michaelvanderkruis8729

2 жыл бұрын

Could be linked to Vaughan in some far away kind of way. It’s more likely the name Vahan derives from the very ancient name Vahagn, the Armenian God of fire. Which later the Swedes took over as Vagn, since they’re the same distant cousins of Armenians. The Germans also have this name but didn’t use it as a human name but instead used it to name their wooden carts after it, Wagen. Which later become a car and thus the term Volkswagen. That’s the history behind it.

My name is Anthony Acosta Aranguri. I am of Mexican decent. My last name Aranguri is synonymous with "Aranguren" which is of Basque orgin. The " Valle de Aranguren" located in Navarre Spain. Aranguren is a village in Navarre Spain...

@briansaul4707

11 ай бұрын

As a teacher (now retired) in the Lis Ángeles area, most of my students were of hispanic background. I knew that MANY of them have Basque surnames, especially those whose ancestors had lived in the Chihuahua and Durango, México area. I wasn’t surprised, however, because that general region is called Nueva Vizcaya. During the New Spain period, that was the first province in the north to be setlled by the Spaniards under the ægis of Francisco de Ibarra. It was named his homeland, the Bay of Biscay - part of the historic territory of the Basque people . Bizkaia, its official name. Basically V = B in Spanish pronunciation. The Euskara language is called Vasco in Spanish. Also, you may remember the names of explorer, first European to cross the Isthmus of Panamá and “discover” the Pacific Ocean, Vasco Núñez de BALBOA, which revealed the western coast of New Spain - prime for settlement and trade routes. Few students were aware of their Basque ancestry- much less a possible a Armenian linguistic link!

The songs that appear on the video are called "bertso", there are a form of improvised poetry that our "bards" (bertsolari) sing in our festivals. Usualy, a judge gives them a premise for the song and qualified theyr job by theyr sagacity, speed of answer and veracity. National winners (txapeldun) of those contests are consider as celebrities and honorable people in the entire Basque lands (Euskal Herria)

@soleaguirre100

3 жыл бұрын

Interesting thanks 😊 my grandpa came to Chile from San Sebastián to Santiago Chile when he was a young boy 17 years old Aguirre Echeverría. l have relatives in San Sebastián and Bilbao! greetings from Chile

@asierurteaga1227

3 жыл бұрын

@@soleaguirre100 Tu primer apellido es mi segundo y soy de un pueblo cercano a San Sebastian. De hecho un hermano de mi abuelo emigro a latinoamerica y no volvio. Por casualidad en los terrenos que compro tu abuelo encontro petroleo? Si la respuesta es si, somos familia.

@soleaguirre100

3 жыл бұрын

@@asierurteaga1227 Hola Asier mi abuelo llegó con 17 años primero a Buenos Aires luego fue a Montevideo y por último terminó en Chile; Trabajo muchísimo y logró tener su propia zapatería luego otras y hasta un restaurante en una calle muy importante del centro de Santiagp que en aquellos años era elegante pero no tuvo nada con petróleo aunque igual llevó una vida muy próspera.y es divertido pensar que toda mi familia mis ancestros han sido casados Vascos y Escoceses o ingleses yo también! 😊 Agur!

It's hard to believe the scholars of earlier centuries who worked out Semitic language trees and Indo-European language trees would have not worked out a language tree for Basque and Armenia, if one were possible.

Excellent. But where is the discussion of GRAMMAR, rather then just vocabulary. Compare the structure of these two languages, please!

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

@user-nw4tc3zv2d

3 ай бұрын

Surely the European vocabularies can be used in Basque's, but in GRAMMAR, especially the word order and the Agglutinative, the way to build vocabulary are very very similar to Korean Language! And when they dance, they raise the arms up. We Korean people also raise the arms up when we dance Falk Dance in group...

Dr. Setyan’s thesis appears to be built upon a logical foundation, I appreciated his frequent comment regarding his sources and urging his listeners to do their research and not to passively accept his information. Thank you.

Excellent! Need to watch it several times i guess!

Will you ever stop😂? Armenian is Indo-European language And Basque language has nothing to do with it.

Ridiculously grotesque association since Armenian is an Indoeuropean and Basc is a neolitic pre- indoeuropean language.The Bascs survived the last Würmian glaciation in one of the climatic refuges in northern Spain.

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

@sMm49

5 ай бұрын

Who said anything about Georgia?

Why is everyone commenting negatively without even reading the book??? For all you know all the undeniable evidence is in the book. You're all over here like the 7 blind mice on the elephant.

@patriot-ny5el

5 жыл бұрын

There is so much hatred for Armenians, that's why we get all the negative comments. Noah landed on mount Ararat and we are descendants of Noah still alive to this day!!!

@MrKmanthie

4 жыл бұрын

@@patriot-ny5el seriously??? "Noah"? What are you, 5? ha ha ha ha...every religion, going back far before fucking christianity have some sort of "flood" myth. And that's ALL they are: MYTHS.

@TheBelilu

3 жыл бұрын

@@MrKmanthie And guess what??? Almost all of them are centered around the same mountains or the same part of the world. Oh & another thing; Not all flood stories are of 'THE Flood' story.

My grandmas last name is Basque and what I learned is that basques are more common to have RH negative blood or something like that and my mom has that type of blood

@bojanstare8667

3 жыл бұрын

Me to and I`m Slav - Slovene. And some words are also similar with same meaning. How so?

@MacSherry

3 жыл бұрын

Also, lots have 0 type blood.

@bojanstare8667

3 жыл бұрын

@@MacSherry Also my father in laww.

@mariaxs777

3 жыл бұрын

Indeed. I am Armenian and have RH negative blood! That is meaningful.

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

@@mariaxs777 Me too- Armenian with O Rh neg blood, which I think was the blood type all humans had until mutations that protected against plague and other diseases were successful and took off, creating first the Rh (positive) factor, then becoming A, B and AB (both positive and negative.) I imagine that the Basques, living relatively isolated and self-sufficient lives in a part of Europe that wasn't as exposed to outside influences, were somewhat protected from the ravages of the plague, which did not wipe out the original population (O neg blood type).

Vahan! Dad did a DNA test and he showed up part Armenian! and Iraqi along with Egyptian, Arab, North African and Southern Spain. My Last name is Salazar and most of our family trees are Basque And keep in mind we are now Mexican Americans! wow

@pricklypear6384

Жыл бұрын

@@zaphodtrillian5237 Actually this silly vid proves nothing. Armenians and the Basque people have absolutely no lineage unless you married to someone that has this ancestry. Latin Americans are more likely to have Basque ancestry. Accept your bloodlines and move on.

@johnd2550

Жыл бұрын

@@pricklypear6384 lol you guys are really a bunch of crying weasels, the facts and evidence are more than enough to have a connection I don't know what else needs to convince you people.

@johnd2550

Жыл бұрын

@@pricklypear6384 so where is your counter argument proof to why whatever he say is silly instead of just saying it. The author of the book gave more than enough evidence to why there is a connection between the basque in the Armenian people on the other hand there's no counter argument to why it can't be can you provide it instead of crying about it

@johnd2550

Жыл бұрын

@@zaphodtrillian5237 says the guy with no counter argument

@johnd2550

Жыл бұрын

@@zaphodtrillian5237 haha, buddy pal, I get it you wanna say that you're this unique ethnicity that no one is related but that's not true, again simplify saying I'm basque and no there isn't any connections doesn't make it a good or valid argument or counter argument, we don't simply say there are 500 words that mean and are pronounced the same we prove it with linguistics, history and scientific DNA so again you can cry all you want but it doesn't change the fact that THERE IS SIGNIFICANT Evidence of basque and Armenian having a connection ahahaha, you're a imbecile

I have Basque ancestry on both my late Maternal 2X Great-Grandmother Rose Dazet,and also my other Maternal 2X Great-Grandmother Louise Cambas.The Basque surnames were Cambas,Castay,Cornibe,Dazet ,and Jazard.

Wow, I can't believe there are so few likes and comments on such important work

@alazarwanderer9806

3 жыл бұрын

cause this is a stupidity

@mariamadjemian2546

3 жыл бұрын

@@alazarwanderer9806 can you explain why is stupidity? Maybe you need some education?

So funny. I just remembered something from childhood. There were some Persian Armenians that used the word 'Horrena' for 'There it is'. We considered them peasants for speaking that way but we all know the so-called peasants are more likely the ones to speak the purest form of a language.

@patxi601

3 жыл бұрын

In euskara you have " horrela" that means "thus" in english, por lo tanto, in spanish.

@TheBelilu

3 жыл бұрын

@@patxi601 Ya. Coincidentally, just two days ago i got interested in this topic again, ended up seeing those words in your vocabulary & thought it interesting that they're all pretty much used in the same sense. Very interesting. Then i came across a video that talked about your people & your country. Loved the part where it said your people almost never litter the streets. I fell in love & started dreaming about living there. I wanna be amongst such people.

@patxi601

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheBelilu Yes, it's an interesting coincidence. Our cities use to be clean, nowadays that we can afford it. Come to visit when you want.

@TheBelilu

3 жыл бұрын

@@patxi601 I Checked the cities out on google maps. They look clean.

@lilalucia1554

3 жыл бұрын

@@patxi601 Barev! 😀Hi I'm Armenian from Sydney & when we can travel again, I'm coming to Spain. I have a cousin who lives in Valencia & after travelling in Spain, I'm definitely going to come to visit your beautiful Basque country. I have seen a lot of Basque travel videos which are lovely & your beaches look wonderful to holiday at in the summer too. All your food looks very delicious & I can't wait to try them. See you there soon, take care! :)

I love this!! Makes so much sense :)

Vahan Sarkisian (always alive for me) and his follower Vahan Setyan are making a great work to show that the relationship between armenia and basque country is undeniable. Ukaezina in basque. I am an independent researcher of the basque country, and nowadays i consider myself basque-armenian. I agree with them. Furthermore, I think that from the basque language we could "read" some names like ARAZ river, which means CLEAN, PURE, INMACULATE. We have plenty of araz erreka (araz rivers) in the basque country. I consider that these rivers, were to PURIFY, in orther to make the sacrifice of the lambs in the hill of the mountain, in ancient stones called ARA. This word is a key word, very important. In basque "ara egin" (make ara) means to offer something to gods. I have been studying the basque geography looking for ARA-s and they are usually nearly the top of the mountain, to offer and make fire and eat the lamb. The ARA stone is into a sacred space called ARAMA. This ARA is in ARARAT and ARAGATS for example. ARA means in basque "here you are!" It is related to the verb- AR-TU, take. (me=Iñaki-Vahan Bastarrika-Izagirre). A town in the basque country close to the capital Vitoria is called ARMENTIA. To be continued . The name ARA(T)Z in basque children is quite common nowadays. I believe that sheperds from Armenia came to the basque country coming down from 3.000 metres high to the 1000m o less of the basque land when ice began to melt, thousandas of years ago. The actual armenian language has no much similarity with basque, but urartian (2800-2400 before christo) must have. The armenians, in my opinion, lost their ancient language, and we, the basque are the only cousins that can speak and write. iñk

@varjovirta3085

6 ай бұрын

Interesting comment. I have heard many theories of origins of Basque and what it is and nobody has done real proper study on this until now. There's a trend among academy right now to link Indo-european languages Uralic languages but as a Uralist this has very little evidence, most basic words like body parts, wildlife, nature are totally different. And we know latest studies point out that Yamna isn't were Indo-europeans came from because male haplos didn't mach with Corded ware samples, also there wasn't such a big gene flow that previously thought. Well aswell Armenian has a lot to with Urartian, they have lots of words in common in them, even grammartical elements are similar. I have seen this myself, even some languages like sumerian and elamite maybe also Indo-european. Sumerian word for water is the same as on of the proto-IE water (h'ep) comparasion to sumerian ap, also proto-IE h'ek meaning to see, vision comparasion to sumerian igi meaning vision. So finally this new evidence drops all the weight from my shoulders and finally puts Uralic languages back to where it truly belongs which is ofcourse the controversal Ural- altaic languages. Many basic words are the same.

At minute nine in this video, Vahe Khachatryan says that Vahan Sarkisian's publications in Spain cannot be found. But the Spanish Hemeroteca Nacional always gets and preserves a copy of whatever material published in Spain. Has it been checked out?

What about the Basques that traveled north by sea after the last ice age 200,000 years ago and ended up in what are now Russia, Sweden, Scotland, England, Wales, and Ireland? British researchers found some West Irish with as much as 62% Basque DNA due to their isolation, and some English with as little as 2%.

@fercos33

4 жыл бұрын

way way outdated studies you are referring to, basque people differ little from their neighbors genetically, linguistically they are special. And probably not at all connected armenian (this video presents a fringe theory) which is indo-european like English etc

@Beruthiel45

3 жыл бұрын

Only high numbers of a specific blood type. Not genes.

Very interesting video. But why do I get the impression that Armenians are more interested in the idea and possibility that their roots are as far away from the Middle East as possible? Genetically aren’t they closest to Assyrians?

What did the lady who spoke at say was a river in both Armenia and in Basque? Then what did she was about Iran?

Where did this Presentation take place,please?Did it take place in a bookstore in Armenia,or did it take place here in America?Sorry to bother you,but I,m just reallly curious as to where this event took place.Anyway,Mr.Setyan's prsentation was quite thorough,and interesting.Kudos to him for this very excellent Presentation.

@CM-hn2tv

Жыл бұрын

Bookstore in Los Angeles

"Armenia words have the atomic elements, the numbers in the words"

Is this the Armenian version of we wuz kangz theory?

@ArthaxtaDaVince777

5 жыл бұрын

Lmao, I hope not. I am Armenian and I wont stand for this type of crap. Armenians are Hurrian/Urartian descendants, what the fuck do Basque have to do with this?

5 жыл бұрын

As I commented to someone else..rosihantu1 if you read the book..and see the science of it..not the opinions.and not the emotions...you may change your mind..We have to consider the time is history the influence occurred... Let me quote Ellis(1820-1885) 'Armenian conquest and migrations in Europe have been during pre-historic and pre-traditional times'. Quote from Robert Ellis (1820-1885)..from Ellis's book on the Etruscans and their beginnings....Other historians will agree..for example..also..from the book mentioned..H.V. Hilprecht(1859-1925) a Clark research professor of Assyriology and scientific director Babylonian expedition at the University of Penn. argue that the Hittite tongue is Armenian and the Hittites themselves were of Armenian stock...also from Ellis and other historians... (1861) through language analysis we observe that under the names of Phrygians, Thracians, Pelasgians and Etruscans spread westward from Armenia toItaly and Elis claimed that the closest affinities of the Aryan element are theArmenians ..other historians that agree are..Hellenthal, Busgy, Brand, Wilson, Myers and Falush...

@ArthaxtaDaVince777

5 жыл бұрын

hike oganessian Most scholars and historians can agree that the Hittites and Hurrians had a relation to Armenians. But so say that Hittite spoke an Armenian tongue, thats far fetched. Armenia was born from a culmination of tribes known as Hayasa, Nairi and Arme-Shupria.

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

@antikgayane9870

11 ай бұрын

@@ArthaxtaDaVince777 When they study the languages of the hitties, urrartu, and mittani, you can’t understand it if you don’t know Armenian. In other words, those languages are only understood by Armenian speaking people.

It doesn't start well... At 7:43: the map only shows the autonomous region of Euskadi (in Spain) - 3 provinces out of the 7 constituing the whole of the Basque Country, which also includes the autonomous province of Navarra (also in Spain) and the 3 basques provinces on the French side of the border. Doesn't bode well for the rest of the lecture... More than 21 minutes in and I'm still waiting for actual real data on the subject boasted in the title of the vid... I expected some syntaxe and grammar comparisons and not just words comparisons.

@johnd2550

2 жыл бұрын

Buy the book and you'll get all those answers, this lecture doesn't touch on the topic in depth as the book does

The similarities in a subset of the vocabulary are really astounding. But you have to consider that the grammatical structure of Armenian is Indo-European, while Basque is not. There could be a connection through Luwian/Lemnian and the Etrurian/Raetian group in Italy and the Alps. This definitely needs to be investigated further. To simply ignore the similarities would be foolish.

@ezzovonachalm9815

2 жыл бұрын

Guido Pahlberg There is no connexion between Etruscan and Raetian , the last being a semitic language. Linus Brunner, Alfred Toth.Die Rätische Sprache enträtzelt. St Gallen 1988

@lianaminasyan1783

2 жыл бұрын

Թռչունները Հայքից են նույնպես

@lianaminasyan1783

2 жыл бұрын

Էտրուսկները

@roflswamp6

2 жыл бұрын

@@ezzovonachalm9815 1988 lmao really bro

@ezzovonachalm9815

Жыл бұрын

Retic has been deciphered as an east semitic language near to Akkadian. Linus Brunner, A.Toth Die rätische Sprache enträtzelt. Kulturamt St Gallen 1989. The Reti venerated the mesopotamian godesses RITU or REITU , the goddess Estu and the god Kastor as the epigrafic testimonies in the retic sanctuaries establish. The retic language has nothing in common with the etruscan language.

Vahan Setyan is very good I will listen to this

Where did this lecture take place? It just says a book store not what country or state

@vahanari9013

6 жыл бұрын

There is one Abril bookstore and it’s in California.

@ETOMASSI

6 жыл бұрын

I haven't watched the whole video to see where the talk took place, but I think as Vahan below is indicating it took place at Abril Bookstore in Glendale CA USA. As for the book itself, Abril bookstore sells it and you can buy it online www.abrilbooks.com . It's $29.95 US dollars. The address is 415 E. Broadway, Suite 102 Glendale, CA 91205 (818) 243-4112 Phone (818) 243-4158 Fax. I also found it on Amazon but much more expensive. Just for clarification, I don't work for the bookstore or in any way related. This is just to help you out.

@Susanc06

6 жыл бұрын

Vahan Ari Thank you I would like to get in touch with him.

@ETOMASSI

6 жыл бұрын

If you clean up your sentences you will get a proper response since the sentences are not making sense. By the way who are as you put it "fucking, black Armenians? Who do you define as the "true white aryan"?

51:00 there is an error in the slide. Cooper in Spanish is Cobre like in Portugese. Cubre is to cover something and it is a verb.

Where can this book be bought? It’s not available on Amazon.

@hikeoganessian1482

3 жыл бұрын

April book store..glandale, ca

@neatchipops3428

3 жыл бұрын

XD

@tobyplumlee748

3 жыл бұрын

@@hikeoganessian1482 thank you. I hope you are continuing your research with near eastern Armenian farmer migrations into European regions. Do you have a website or KZread channel? Also what books would you recommend?

paracus skulls from Peru put them at the black sea and i think relate to this . Mt Ararat is near here and where humans spree out ... good presentation

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

Colchians (Georgians) were called Macrocephaloi (Macrons, Macrocephals) that means Elongated-Heads.

I did the second most obvious thing, which was to Google in Spanish and French for information about the book and the thesis it lays out - and I couldn't find a thing. I tried searching Google Scholar using the key terms "Euskara - Vahan Setyan" and I found nothing in any language to confirm, contradict or even mention Setyan's argument. To my mind this is bizarre, and I shall suspend all judgement until information is forthcoming from Euskadi itself.

@kh2375.2

Жыл бұрын

I agree, using Google translate I only found two words that have a correspondence between Armenian and Basque. That is the word (water) and (Balloon). Other than that no other word matched up. Secondly, he cites a source of a Spanish Basque historian who cited the Bible as evidence that the Basques descend from Tubal who came from Armenia. I commend that historian for his attempted contribution but that source that Vahan quoted operates in the prevailing paradigm of the time that the Bible is an accurate historical rendition for world history. Although, I do agree there is some relevant historicity in the bible but we must be able to confirm scientific studies with alternative sources aswell before coming to conclusions. Moreover, Armenian is traditionally classified as an Isolated Indo-European Language but Basque has been found to have no connection to Indo-European languages by scholars. So the raises the question.... Who's right and who's wrong? Do scholars have it wrong about what language family Armenian belongs to or which one Basque belongs to? Maybe Sarkisian clarifies this. So I too, for now, will suspend judgement on this matter until further evidence is brought forth.

It sad that a lot of old languages have been lost. I'm sure that many different things caused the loss. Has anyone ever looked at the voynich manuscript in relation to some of these languages. I might be far off in wondering if there is any relation. Does anyone know where that book came from? There was so much movement of people and so much mixed blood it's intriguing to wonder about how the languages were all mixed together in this movement of our people. ( our people meaning the whole world as one)

Basque language is NOT indo- European, but Armenian is indoeuropian. Basque language has similarities to Kartvelian languages ( current Georgian) as most scientists are proving. Proto - Georgian was spoken in Mediterranean area before indoeuropian people advance and conquered these tribes and assimilated with them.

Հայերը լավ կլիներ պարզեին իրենց ծագումնաբանությունը, կան տարբեր վարկածներ։ Հետո չեմ հասկանում սրա իմաստը, մենք արդեն թշնամացել ենք մեր բոլոր հարևանների հետ, հիմա էլ հասանք Բասկերին։ Ապացուցված է, որ մարդը ծագում է Աֆրիկայից, հետո ի՞նչ։

@alazarwanderer9806

3 жыл бұрын

ապացուցված չէ ! սա էլ նույն պես

I would love to find out where the rh- blood line came from and or what caused the mutation.

I think people should read the book before they show their hate..

@raymondfrye5017

4 жыл бұрын

Hate?...how did that get into the picture?

@tobyplumlee748

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, let history and research fall in place without ignorant prejudice or fear of having ones theory or academic reputation cross examined. Very interesting topic!! I love the research and have to admit even a fool should see thier is a distant connection with the Armenian region.

The similarities of Basque and Armenian vocabularies is very compelling. But to say that Armenia is the homeland of the Indo European family is quite a stretch. Some evidence must be presented to make that claim. You say that there are others making such a claim but without evidence such a claim is worthless.

@onlythetruth4039

2 жыл бұрын

I totally agree with you. I have heard the Turks came with a similar claim for native Indians. There was a Turkish scholar who came to the conclusion that Turks are related to native Indians because there are some similarities in the language, as ancient Turkick people originated from the Altai mountains region, which is the original homeland of all the Americas native ancestry. Problem is when I see a Turk, I only see a Greek,Armenian, Arab or Kurd person with a Turkick name. Only a fraction of Turkey has some sort of Altai ancestry. Turks look like eastern Mediterranean, middle Eastern or even European some time.

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

Im 35 years of age. I recently found out my last name Aranguri is synonymous with Aranguren and is a Basque name. I never knew the orgin of my last name Aranguri...

With the linguistic similarities, is their any ancient history of an exodus out of Armenia westward? Did they migrate by sea or land?

@zodiacmansions

3 жыл бұрын

Depends on who you ask...one says east, up and around the Caspian, the next says through the Cauausus up and aroound the black sea. yet another says west and up the Danube, yet another says thorugh North Africa and up into Spain. and the last say by sea through the Mediterranean. As if "scattered to the four winds" has no meaning.

@briansaul4707

2 жыл бұрын

It would have been interesting to hear what he would suggest was the motivation for migration from the Armenian region.

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

@@briansaul4707 Hi, Brian - he definitely connected the migration with the search for metals/gold to be used in metallurgy which he says places it during the Kingdom of Mitanni era around 4,000 years ago

Very interesting. What he says here makes logical sense. The same can be said about the Russian and archaic Sanskrit languages. I was very surprised to find endless parallels between Russian/Slavic and archaic Sanskrit languages. Look it up and see for yourself

For those that don't see the connections, you're not listening..also, it's everybody's history...all nations contribute to world civilization.

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

Very true! Plus there were no nations yet! Just people looking for an easier life...

I’m part Basque and I hardly doubt it! I just think that Armenians for whatever reason want to be Europeans so bad. But they are Anatolian. If you were to ask a Basque person if they are Armenian they would get really insulted. They are Indo-Europeans from that region and that’s it! I’ve talk to some of them and they consider themselves part French.

@j.a.400

2 жыл бұрын

As for me, personally, i do not give a fuck if they say we are armenians.

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

@MarieAntoinette1938_tmc

11 ай бұрын

They are part French. In my experience with the Armenian culture they seem to be want to be referred to as Arians but they are Anatolians also they have a tendency to say they invented everything like Duduk it's not an armenian instrument it's Azerbaijani that's where it was really found they say oh it was Armenian land but there's theories there too . Basque people are not Armenian.

@harmony5807

10 ай бұрын

​@@MarieAntoinette1938_tmcBasque people are not partly French, being in a Republic of France does not mean they are partly French, they are French only by their nationality, but the Basque are just Basque from both French of south west and North Spain, they are very old culture, ancient people, I like that they are a msytery and Armenians are just Armenians in that perspective, otherwise Basque are humanoids, Armenians too and You too!!! and Duduk in Armenian is Ծիրանափող, Ciranapoch which means blowing Apricot it is recognised by UNESCO and historians as a traditional Armenian Instrument not Azerbaijani !!! Cheers from Armenia my friend

@harmony5807

10 ай бұрын

@mexicanbeautyqueen7988 Hello, I will hardly disagree, Armenians are Armenians, We are not Asian, Not European, not Basque, not Middle Eastern, not Anatolian it just happens that we are at that part of the planet!! just as Greeks are just Greeks and not Europeans, Jews are Jews and not Middle Easterns, and Basque are Basque and not European as it is not an ethnic group and Armenians do not want to be European we have better values as a human, as mothers, as fathers, as children and elder people have you been in Europe?? Very little values are left, no giving space for pregnant woman in a public transport, not helping an elder to cross the street, the police does not even help to place you from one destination to another, so I strongly advise you to Visit Armenia and then JUDGE!! at the end of the day we are all living in the infinite space and an open heart is important for our well being as One humanity. Armenians are usually heart centered people and like a lot foreigners and are welcoming plus friendly which unfortunately I can not say abt the Basque people from French side as they do not like neither Foreigners and not French may be because of their history do not know... little sad for Basque people too as they had a hard history and are survivors though may be we are similar in that manner. Anyway I do not see similarities in characters but may be Historians know better and they check the Imigration of tribes, Dna etc to see the shared Genetics... The Northern Spain's Basque though are very warm and cute compare to the South west of France's side! So do not assume that Armenians like to be Europeans as there is nothing to like abt it, too much cold hearted people who are based on intellect but not to their Heart's center... At the end of the day only Love counts, love we have given to another who suffers cause one love can heal the entire Humanity!!! Shalom from Armenia

This is complete nonsense. Church in Basque is called eliza. It is nothing like the Armenian եկեեղեցի (ekeġec'i). However both are derived from the Greek Εκκκλησία. Cherry in Basque is gerezi, while in Armenian is կեռաս (geras). They are very similar with good reason, but not because the Basque word is derived from Armenian but because both are derived from the Greek κερασός (kerasós). When two words in two languages are similar, it may be by chance, because they are both borrowed from another language, or for other reasons. It is not an automatic borrowing. And when two words are a common borrowings from another language, they are often not similar because of the evolution of both languages. Armenian is an Indo-European language and will logically have many cognates in Basque, because Basque has borrowed a lot from Latin and Spanish - both Indo-European languages - although Basque has a radically different origin.

This is wonderful to hear . My Paternal Grandmother was Catherine Basque. We are from Norhern New Brunswick area. We are a very old family line.

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

The people who lived in spain and france ,on either side of the basque country , probably had another language before the romans brought latin. Maybe it was the basque language. Although basque are somewhat isolated , they still share much genetics with the surrounding populations.

@i.alegre9401

3 жыл бұрын

Romance languages do not stam from Latin

@ezzovonachalm9815

Жыл бұрын

Among the people who lived in Iberia as the Romans came are the preindojewroupean Ligurians and the Phenicians.

@real_name_

11 ай бұрын

@@i.alegre9401 oh, really?

The nuance of this is beyond my understanding

this is interesting to be available to learn more about the languages being connected. though making comments is difficult without speaking in person as I know my people originally spoke Arcado-Cypriot 17 generations before the Trojan War. The original migrations of pre-Hellenic times by Oenotrus and Peucetius leaving king Lykaon their father and other siblings. When they arrived across the Ionian Gulf into Oenotria (later named Italia) there were only a scattered number of people and they were pastoral as were the first migrators. They had a patriarchal government and pastoralism was the way of living, besides they were intelligent people which could build barges and knew how to mine and do metallurgy as well as agricultural techniques and engineering techniques from the knowledge imparted unto them by their fathers.

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

@ Thomas Furlano - Wow! You should write a book too - that's fascinating stuff! You actually have knowledge of your family that goes back 17 generations before the Trojan war?! (When exactly was that, anyway?) You're very lucky to know so much about your roots, and I'm sure many, many other people would love to learn more about such a distant time in our collective past. I knew nothing specifically about Arkado-Cypriots before reading your comment (and I've always been fascinated by ancient Greece and the Mediterranean.)

I became interested in the Basque People, Culture, History, and Ancient History when it came to my attention that Basque is predominantly the lineage of my Irish (County Kerry and County Cork lineage). DNA/Rh(-) I was born in Chicago, USA. Having lived in Nevada for 17 years, I also knew of the Basque through University of Nevada Reno's Basque focus. My degree includes majors in Sociology, Journalism, and History. I research a fair amount. I've a hypothesis that the Basque migrated East, then later many migrated West. This statement includes several subject points. I am seeking a reliable resource for the "Basque History, including Oral History". I follow the "Standards of Science and Research", therefore my mind is not distracted by a 19th Century Theory Paradigm. Facts and Value of Information handed down are resources that get my attention. There exists much in what's accused to be Myth. There exists much more than a linear Timeline in our Human History. Best Wellbeing ...

Wow!! Ty for this. I’ve subscribed 🥰

Great video, it's interesting that my Basque families did the same in renaming area where they move, my family founded Nuevo Leon in Mexico and just renamed everything from northern Spain there. My last name is Salazar, its Basque but we also have strong Jewish family roots also that the Basque came with to Mexico.

@abrahambaghdasarian8972

5 жыл бұрын

Sanasar and baghdasar is two brothers is Armenian name in atruscian salzar and baltazar in Tuscany whos build Roma and Arman is Armenian name too

@abanduazar2612

3 жыл бұрын

Basque is not of Armenian origin but Basque is of Berber origin

@tobyplumlee748

3 жыл бұрын

@@abanduazar2612 maybe Berbers share some of the same distant ancestors from the Armenian region as the Basques and many Europeans from the multiple farmer migrations from the near east. That seems very logical.

@TheBelilu

3 жыл бұрын

@@tobyplumlee748 It's actually been said that some Berbers are related to Armenians.

@derlingerardclair6252

2 жыл бұрын

@@abanduazar2612 It's possible that it may be of distant Berber origin.Only GOD knows how Basque originated in remote ANTIQUITY.

Something he didn't even discuss is the fact that Armenian is Indo-European whereas Basque is not. So then how would an Indo-European language be the same as a non Indo-European language? Also, why try to make a connection to the Basques and NOT to the Iberians who were more numerous and more widespread throughout Spain???? Their language was probably related to the Basque language. Rather than trying to connect Basques to a foreign culture (the Armenians), it would make more sense to connect them to a culture that were their direct neighbors on the same peninsula. I would think that in order to decipher the "mystery" of Basque people, it would require the study of the Iberians first and foremost. And yes I know that there isn't much information available on the Iberians. But it would be more logical to figure out who THEY were first (language, origin, etc) and see if there really was a connection to the Basque before trying to connect Basques to a people halfway around the world.

@redl1ner170

Жыл бұрын

Totally agree. There's a catalan linguistic called Antoni Jaquemont that has found out numbers in iberian are basically the same as euskera (basque). See this: kzread.info/dash/bejne/rH5nsqimfKWvYdY.html

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

This is wonderful, I have had a feeling Basque was not an isolate. Thank you!

Caucasian Iberia we also have and the germanic religion is also about Asir and Vanir (lake Van = Urmia). The germanic tribes arrived to the North sea and Baltic sea around 1000 BCE in boats. Probably 800 BCE. There are also connections between english and Basque. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Iberia

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

At 58:00 he mentions Atkinson and Grey and Armenian as the oldest living language since the last ice age. Can someone elaborate on that or provide a citation?

@NekoFilm

3 жыл бұрын

kzread.info/dash/bejne/iH6YqMuEqq-5aKg.html

@MarieAntoinette1938_tmc

11 ай бұрын

It's not true that's not the oldest language. The caldians and the Iraqi's were the first to have an alphabet and a language not Armenians

In terms of chronology I would love for Vahan Setyan to talk to Graham Hancock. They both have studied Portasar/Gobekli Tepe.

Personally, as an Armenian I don’t see anything special in establishing an ancient connection between Armenians and Basque people. So to all those butthurt Turks who think this is an attempt to steal something from Basque people, just a reminder that stealing is not a part of our culture. We all know who are the ones who came from Altay and stole everything! Now back to the subject, I would have accepted the arguments presented by this guy if he did it the right way. If he presented his book in Cambridge or Oxford in front of people who are expert of the field, it would make sense. But presenting it in a bookstore like this makes me think that it is basically just pseudoscience. You can’t just find a bunch of similarities and come up with a thesis like this.

@salomon813

5 жыл бұрын

So what are you saying is that you don´t believe because the book wasn´t present in a presticious Faculty? That make no sense

@raffiart5121

5 жыл бұрын

Salo Mon That’s not exactly what I said. I said experts of the field. The question is how many of those people sitting there know enough about this field to challenge him? Probably none.

@arthursirkejyan9607

5 жыл бұрын

For decades, Genocide denialism was based in one of the most prestigious universities on the east coast. I'm assuming you would accept the arguments of professors that said the Armenian Genocide never happened simply because they spoke from a prestigious pulpit with an audience of "experts". Secondly, you have no clue who the individuals in the audience were, perhaps if you were there you would have met a few historians like I did.

I feel a bit pity to such resources that is being wasted on meaningless theories that aim make „we“ the superior culture of all time. Highlights kept the culture away from being effected. That does not mean that everything is invented up on the top of the mountains. EDIT: This comment is not talking from an anti-Armenian prospective, kurds (upper kurmanjî and lower) share the identical culture (at the Hurrian period before the Aryan transformation). Later time it have been changed.

@MrKmanthie

4 жыл бұрын

"aryan" stories are long-discredited BULLSHIT.

4 жыл бұрын

the issue is knowing our past....human ego is always involved, however we want to know our grandparents...It's just that all our lives, we heard incorrect history...Rothman, quoted said...''All that was known in Mesopotamia came from Armenia and that Armenia is the absent fragment in the entire mosaic of the ancient world's civilization's construction

@amek1900

4 жыл бұрын

​@123ana123 Ur123 there is no evidence in the history that thousands of people migrated and replaced the original inhabitants. Migration can lead to complex scenarios but though it mixes with originals not replacing them. And yes, Kurds especially the Northern, have genetically a notable relation to Armenians. 
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274378/

The connection is with the Iberian Georgians/Caucasians, not with Armenians, That's a mistake.

@davexorus9836

2 жыл бұрын

Yes you are right. Since both languages are non indo-european

@EasternOrthodox101

2 жыл бұрын

@@davexorus9836 Yes, and they were not called both Ibres and both are connected with the Biblical name Tubal

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

@@davexorus9836 The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

@trwier

Ай бұрын

I'm a PhD linguist, and I can tell you certifiably that no serious linguist believes that Basque is related EITHER to Georgian OR to Armenian. This claim is full-on BS.

@EasternOrthodox101

Ай бұрын

@@trwier Language doesn't equal race, so get education, I don't care about PhD. Secondly, correct, Basques are just another Celtic sub-race out of many, nothing special about them & no genetic connection to Iberians, only other connections maybe.

57:24 disappointing to see him think that the Armenian language is not also based on a prior older language..

I did the second most obvious thing, which was to Google in Spanish and French for information about the book and the thesis it lays out - and I couldn't find a thing.

@Bran08Eman

2 жыл бұрын

Accommodating another "People" in a country is messy. Those governments best hide and commit cultural genocide before the word gets out. That's politics...

Pure shit !!! Kaka hutsa !!!!!

@elizabetharduain

6 ай бұрын

Horri Bera!

Good day. I am in the Philippines in the South East Asia, a country named by spanish explorer after Prince Philip of Asturias who become Holy Roman Emperor and Spain's King Philip II. I am the eldest son of the eldest daughter of Spanish or Portugueze Ricardo Calsis or Chalcis. When i was young i was in front of my grandfather and his eldest sister who argued when his eldest sister said "you are stubborn Ricardo you are indeed descendant of Aristobulus." Then my grandmother told me that my grandfather Ricardo is related to spanish family of Lainez, Jimena, Dequina, and de celez.

@josebulang7981

2 жыл бұрын

Then my grandmother told me that my grandfather is descended of Spanish Soldier who won his wife Princess by a local duel with local nobilities.Then when i become professional my aunt, daughter of sister of my grandfather who said my grandfather is descendant of Aristobulus, told me that my grandfather Calsis is related to families of Ochoa and Vasquez. Then i read in Antiquity of the Jews that King Aristobulus of Chalcis son of King Herod V of Chalcis, was made by Rome the last King of Armenia Minor until 97BC. I wonder is it possible that the sons and daughters of King Aristobulus of Chalcis settled in the Basque country, because my grandmother said that my grandfather ancèstors come from Gispuzcoa. And in biography of father andres ochoa de urdaneta, as spanish soldier who sailed to Moluccas, spice island in the far east in 1526, he fathered a daughter from an Indian woman who he left in Portugal in 1535. My grandfather told me "you must be industrious, do not rob, there is no honor of being called theft, better called a killer than a theft. You must have Honor without Stain." Now i read Honor without Stain is the Creed of Knights of Order of Santiago or Order of Saint James. Most if the explorers in 1500 who reach far east like Vasco da Gama, Sebastian Elcano, father andres de urdaneta are from Basque. And lastly my grandfather told me "do not be coward, you must have courage, our Champion is Charles Martel." Why Charles Martel. I read certain writings that Emperor Charlemagne grandson of Charles Martel is a descendant of Herod the Great and Cleopatra of Egypt. And my grandfather given me name Edroheno which when rearranged is Herod One. Just sharing my mother's familt oral tradition. Is it possible that descendants of Aristobulus settled in Basque from Armenia. Antiquity of the Jews said one son of Herod the great was vanished by Rome to Vienne of the Gaul in 7AD other son was vanished to Valentia Editania in 39AD.

@ninastar5833

2 жыл бұрын

@@josebulang7981 Very interesting - I hope one day you put it in writing and add it to our knowledge of history. Oral stories are very important.

Armenian it's an independent branch of the Indo-European lenguage, Basque it's not related to any linguistic group.

5 жыл бұрын

Have you read the book...are familiar with linguistics..

@annapetrosan2779

5 жыл бұрын

Gus Salas are they Alien)))

@patriot-ny5el

5 жыл бұрын

Hahahaha..suurre,NO CONNECTION (ALIENS)

@MrKmanthie

4 жыл бұрын

that's "LANGUAGE"...

@patriot-ny5el

4 жыл бұрын

@Hendrick Adakai .. Right...damn those damn Armenians!!!

Seems like the case is closed. Linguistics and DNA science unravels the mystery. Great work. Interesting how the geography is similar in both places. A chain of mountains spans a thin piece of land, with sea on both sides. Maybe the similarity in geography was part of the appeal.

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

This is extremely interesting. I have Y-DNA Scottish ancestry (R1b). A few years ago I used a series of articles published in the Russian Journal of Genetics to trace back a specific set of STR markers to Syunik province in southern Armenia. If I recall correctly the highest concentration of that set of markers was in Sisian. Also around that time the prevailing thought was that Celts of the British Isles had their origin in the Basque region. Now to find this presentation years later...almost a validation of my previous study. Although I'm sure there's plenty of academicians that vigorously object...lol There always is. We need to unlink tenure from the advancement of knowledge as it acts as a hindrance imho. People are afraid of losing position and/or status. At the time of this comment I noriced recently that they are pushing the region of origin for R1b haplogroup more toward this same region from further west in Turkey. Ironically now, my DNA testing company tells me I have 0% from the Iberian peninsula (Basque). Disappointing. LOL That has not changed my tracing to Syunik province however. I'm intersted to see where this leads as testing advances. There is a R1b genetic connection to the Bashkirs in the Ural mountains (cenentrated to the north of the area they are found) that should probably be looked at as well. A linguistic connection there would be equally interesting!

@MacSherry

3 жыл бұрын

Also, I am a Scottish... and like you my Basque heritage and Eastern European heritage has disappeared from my dna report. Tenure...has to go! Find the true!

@michaelcandido2824

3 жыл бұрын

wow for real that is sus, all scotts have basque blood.

@thetartanu1535

2 жыл бұрын

Im Assyrian with R1B group

@tracypaxton1054

2 жыл бұрын

Do the Scythians have any connection to the Armenians? They were centered around the Black and Caspian Sea area. Some Scots consider the Scottish people to have a Scythian connection or origin.

@zodiacmansions

2 жыл бұрын

@@tracypaxton1054 I haven't seen anything yet myself, but I suspect that there is something there. As far as I know there's been no loci that could be said to be indicative of "Scythian" origin. Yamnaya areas overlap Scythian areas very tightly, but they are separated in time by 2500 years and it's been another 2000 since about that time...that would be as good as it gets at this point, as far as i know...it's been almost a decade since I paid close attention to this deep ancestry and thing have changed alot since then. It's a place to start though...:) If I recall correctly the claim stems one of the Irish origin stories.

It's quite possible the connection between the Armenia & the Basque Country,because in the ancient times there was 2 Iberia the Caucasian Iberia (Georgia&Armenia) and the Iberian peninsula,so I think the basques came from an armenian diaspora.

@davexorus9836

2 жыл бұрын

iberia was a georgian state. and basques may be related to georgians not to armenians. Its a lie

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

right from the start "his first two books were a big hit" ... hmm yes try to find them in print?

Just looking at culture it’s pretty easy to see similarities between some of most persecuted cultures.(Armenian, Celtic, Amazigh, Tartars, Romani, Hungarian and Basque just to name a few) almost like a deliberate attempt of rape, murder, displacement, persecution, & most recently forced sterilization, towards a special type of people, just the thoughts of a curious construction work with a love for learning

That curious link make me so sensitive to armenian affairs. I would like to know more about armenian lenguage and history, even to visit Armenia some day... As basques for us is difficult to have a serious approach to armenian culture, both lands are situated in the opposite, eastern and western, lands of historical christianlands. As ancient "Iberias" both counties seems the alfa and omega around the last 2000 thousend years of world chronicle's. The very first that didnt know many about us are we, the basques. Our writen history just appears at XV century, just a strange moment that would be descripted like a civilizatory key to explain the birth of "western world", just as it is understanding nowadays, further of that everithing is silence and a dark smoke covering over us. I work in a hospital and recently i get a recent born armenian baby on my hands in intensive cares. Looking at him i wonded to my self in wich type of world will they live. Thank you very much for this presentation. Hartzazue besarkada handi bat lur puska honetatik.

i'm basque and i find this offensive

I think this is a perfect example of human migration. This is humanities treasure. I wish the powers that be could put there interest aside. Let humanities story be told.

I'm 11% Basque(~40% Andean, ~20% Andalusian, ~15% Galician, ~10% Irish/Welsh, ~4% Bantu). I'm very skeptical of this theory but I like it nonetheless.

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

@danythrinbell1596

Жыл бұрын

i'm a iberish as i can get i don't have nothing of basque but yes i have wales and Scotia DNA nothing of English or Irish , from the most remote ares of the isles my calculators , 50% halsttat la tenne -50% thracian , yes we are persians hittites mitani hurrians

👏

Nice! If you read Juan Goitia's essay, you will see that old Bask is the proto European language. That is, it was spoken in all Europe. Now I have learnt it was spoken in Armenia as well. Goitia's thesis is a study based on topography (toponimia). That is, the oldest names of geographical sites

This works well with young earth creationist viewpoint. That would put Armenians as descendants of Togarmah in genesis 10. Thus a descendant of Japheth who is associated with the indoeuropean language. After Babel they went to the area of Ararat and retained the limited agricultural skills of Noah had and developed new ones. The ice age would have pushed them to ice free areas of Anatolia and forced more hunting and gathering to supplement farms. It also forced Abrahams father to leave Ur in the Chaldees. Later as the ice melted some were free to migrate west along the southern glacial edge of the alps. You can move a long way with sleds on winter snow and ice. Hunter gathers of the ice age would have been moving around at the same time. Eventually they reach the Pyrenees, settle and mixed with the local population. I believe there were significant Paleolithic & Neolithic trade roots on both land, ice, river and sea. As other populations expanded out from Greece, Italy & the now flooded Mediterranean low lands, they would have militarily cut off any east west travel south of the Alpes. Of course the dates need to be all adjusted because of post flood Carbon12 changes and Vulcanic Carbon12 out bursts, like Minoan eruption. Even if Carbon 14 is constant big local carbon12 out bursts can shift dates thousands of years. That still puts Armenian first in most fields and the masters of domestication of both plants and animals.

Pretty cool.

I am Armenian and I have a question about this presentation. The RH- factor has fascinated me for some time as it has a tendency to trace back to royalty. Due to their anemic nature and rich copper in their blood which gives those with RH- blood types with the appearance of thick blue veins. This is why royalty bluebloods Back to this presentation; if the two groups are related, please explain why Armenians are not known to have RH- in such a high concentration which the Basque have? Even if I can palate the theory that there may be linguistic connection, which requires more research on my part, the RH- factor seems to be a blocker for me personally. Another issue I have is that there is a dogmatic viewpoint among Armenians that we are the descendants of Noah/Urartu. While that may or may not he true, I wont speculate here. However since this is a linguist presentation, let's break down the word Urartu UR was a city in Sumeria UR means city URU-Salima is the city of Salem aka Jerusalem URArtu is the mountains of UR My point here is that there is likely an older root people that connect the Basque and Armenians. However that connection doesnt stop there. Whoever the root people are connect many peoples. And that's where things get complicated. There were so many migrations that took place westward. The Sythians via land, the Phoenicians via sea just to name a few major ones. Also the Tartars seem to never be discussed and were the largest empire in history. There is sure to have been an impact on our history by them. Lastly, how sure are we that Noah was the only survivor of the great flood? Upon reading ancient flood myths, it seems apparent that every history talks about the one survivor of the flood but his name is not Noah. There is two possible explanations to this. Either each peoples is referring to Noah by different names or each nation had their own regional Noah thus there were multiple or even many survivors of the flood. Food for thought.

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

Pure Armenian here and I'm O Rh negative

@MuktiArno

2 жыл бұрын

@@troubadude you are probably royalty. My guess. Possibly assyrian decent? Do you know

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

@@MuktiArno I'm Armenian.

"Fields of Sanaar" sure sounds a lot like "Plains of Shinar". I'm not religious but this sounds like a Tower of Babel event.

The first known people which lived in the Basque region date back to approximately 200,000 years ago. Armenians may have eventually moved into those areas and may have mixed with whomever had been there before them; or it could be the other way around. Trade only happens bi-directionally. Was it trade or conquest (or both) that may have brought Armenians to the Basque region? Many people have occupied the Basque region over time. It would not be accurate to define the Basque people as Armenians. The reason the Basque people don't know where they come from is because they have always been there. Languages do not define genetics, necessarily. For example, I speak English because of where I was born, but I have very little English heritage. And it is a fact that the Basques spread out into Ireland and the regions where the Basque language is no longer spoken. The Basque people occupied a much larger geographic area than they do now long before the Armenians may have integrated into the Basque region. So, there may be some relationship between the Basques and the Armenians, but Basques do not originate with the Armenian people.

I wonder if it is related to old European languages. Old England was once written as Hen Ogledd (“hen” meaning “old” in Armenian): en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hen_Ogledd

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

Old in Armenian is hin or heen, not "hen" - pronounced very differently

@kingkakig

2 жыл бұрын

@@troubadude That's what I meant

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

There's another interesting connection there: there's an ancient stone structure in Armenia very much like Stonehenge (but predating it by 8,000 years), called Karahunge. "Kar" means stone, but the meaning of "hunge" is lost. Still, its linguistic similarity to "henge" is undeniable.

@SleekMinister

2 жыл бұрын

@@troubadude Å hegne means to enclose, and innhegning means enclosure in Norwegian. The Etruscan glyph for 1 looks like an enclosure with a wall, for separating animals and humans, and the name is tun, which means (farmhouse) grounds in N.. One of the earliest cave pictograms looks like an H with lines on the top and bottom, and the small H in Greek is n. The letter for no in Japanese looks like E. 1, and the word means brain. don't sleep with the animals, people

@SleekMinister

2 жыл бұрын

Also, a hinge connects a door with a wall, and Hegnar (someone who encloses) is a wealthy Norwegian family with a lot of clout.

The amount of coinciding words cannot be overlooked, however Armenian in not a layer or a foundation it is just an imput, belonging to the Neolithic. Basque is much older than its interaction with armenian considering it is ergative and aglutinative and shares more primitive words with many other eurasian language families.

there are slavic people who claims the same.

Next video in this series: "Elvish Origins of Armenian: a presentation by Arwen Evenstar Undómiel."

There have been proposed links between Georgian and Basque... Armenia is right next door,makes sense that when the Original europeans were travelling out of Africa some pockets remained in the Caucasus mtns, while other parts of that group went on to people Europe and become the progenitors of the Basques. It seems like every mountain range in the world has that effect, they form protective bubbles for older cultures, people who otherwise would have been mixed and assimmilated with the dominant culture. The Caucasus in particular because of its location it formed a bottleneck for people coming from Africa. That makes sense to me but im not an anthropologist

Thank you for working to save our ancient history! Armenian and Basque people are indeed similar in their personalities and looks as well! What does quackadamia gain from all these lies???

Was original Armenia at the same geography as today Armenia?

@harmony5807

10 ай бұрын

Hello my friend, not really, it has become smaller it was a queit large Kindgom in the past BC, and the human Ego called Aliev and Erdogan wants more and more of Armenia and more and more!! Never enough, you give those 2 the mars and infinite Universe they ll want other dimensions😂

It's a history of people in Europe today

armenian language must be clasified with their cousins, persians, midians, parthians. any other story is a lie

@ramirochavera2437

Жыл бұрын

Yes, Thank You!!!

Given that we have hunter gathers side by side with farmers in many parts of the world today, the idea of agriculture following and displacing hunters is ahistorical. We even have places where society went from farming back to hunter gathering in Amazonia, Europe during the plagues, and even in the Yugoslav Wars of the 1990s. We also have parts of the world that once had mines and metallurgy but lost it as the mines played out and foreign armies looted the precious metal artifacts. Ötzi, the Ice Man found frozen in the ice of the Alps had both a copper axe and Neolithic tools. Ancient man was never less skilled than us just different. I have tried to knap a blade. Its hard.

@christian78478

Жыл бұрын

The question of the origins of the Basques is answered This question is often asked: it is clear that we see great similarities between Georgians and Basques that it is difficult to ignore and deny, but the fact is that, for example, Basques have 0% Caucasian (both North and South Caucasian, i.e. Georgian) local genetics in autosomal genetic research, while their Y-chromosome studies show that most lineages are of the Indo-European "R" haplotype. And this is true, a fact. The answer is as follows: Basques have up to 85% autosomal genetics (complete, total genome) of the Early Neolithic Europeans (EEF), that is, Anatolian hunter-gatherers, whom I personally call "proto-Georgians" for clarity, because their genetics are preserved and spread today in Western Georgia more than in all regions of the world, in Europe the largest percentage of the autosomal genome of these peoples are also Basques, Spaniards, Italians, Sardinians, Corsicans, in general Southern Europeans (up to 80%) and Central Europeans (approx. 80-50%). ), and the least - to Estonians (30%). Here's just what's happening: although both Basques and Georgians have common ancestors - "early European farmers" (EEF) - Anatolian aborigines (EEF - Early European Farmers; Anatolian Aboroginals), Georgians stayed in the Caucasus and Anatolia, and the ancestors of basques stayed there, in the mountains of Western Europe, and for the last millennia Georgians and Basques did not mix with each other. During the autosomal research, they take into account such an old distance and no longer call it Caucasian or Anatolian genetics and refer to it as local European. For example, if tens of thousands of people leave Georgia and settle in the mountains of China, but so that they mix little with others or almost not mix at all and almost exactly preserve their genetics, after a few thousand years their genetics are no longer called Caucasian in a certain category of autosomal research (which is not oriented in order to detect the ancient archeogenetic lineages in the genome), but to the local people because after a long time, so many mutations accumulate in the new generations that you can no longer refer to them by the same name and call them, for example, the mountain people of China, because they are considered local due to living there for several millennia. This happened with the Basques as well. All the similarities that are recorded between Georgians and Basques are caused by the preservation of our (Georgian and Basque) populations of our common ancestors - early European farmers' (EEF) traits. Therefore, from a scientific point of view, it is important to continue the research of Basque-Georgian connections - in this way, we will determine the characteristics of the early European farmers (Anatolian aborigines), which they possessed, but could not be determined by genetic, anthropological and archaeological studies. Such characteristics are, for example, linguistic and cultural characteristics (the custom of polyphonic singing, traditions, shared pre-Christian beliefs, mythology, etc.). "EEF ancestry in modern Europe ranged from 30% in the Baltic States to 90% near the Mediterranean Sea. (Lazaridis et al. 2014, p. 411.) This particular sentence is written here, google it: Early European Farmers - Wikipedia; Then see the subsection of the said article: 3.1 Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Some people also say, that Basque is an isolate language, and connections to Georgian have been disproven. In reality, If 2 languages are not in 1 language family, that does not mean, that they can not have great similarities. I will give you one simple example. From Siberia to Americas migrated ancestors of aboriginal Americans - in approx. 14,000 BC. They were one tribe or very related tribes. probably they spoke in 1 shared language. From about 10,000 BC, after they dispersed to the territories of the North America and the South America and took over such a large area (land larger than two Russias), they lost close contact with each other, and as a result, one initial language formed over the course of 100 centuries: 22 Language families of North America, 51 Language families of South America, 15 Language isolates of Northern America and 28 Language isolates of South and Central America. In total, by the time of the discovery of the Americas by Columbus in the 15th century, there were about 2,000 different languages on both the Americas, thus divided into numerous language families. In fact, Western Eurasian language families, such as Kartvelian, Basque, Sumerian, Hurrian, Urartian, Nakh, Circassian, Old European language families, and the Indo-European language family itself are very related to each other. Caucasian hunter-gatherers (Proto-Georgians) provided 54% genetics of the first Indo-Europeans in the period of their formation in the Yamnaya culture. Then they mixed with the early European farmers still in the Pontic-Caspian steppe (they were also the closest relatives of the proto-Georgians - G2a people). And the ancient Europeans themselves, the Cro-Magnons from Anatolia-South Caucasus, were spread in Europe 24 thousand years ago. Today's Europeans and Georgians are actually one people. Especially Southern Europe, where the genetic and cultural influence of the first European farmers is colossally high.

GAITZ also means "very big".

Surely the European vocabularies can be used in Basque's, but in GRAMMAR, especially the word order and the Agglutinative, the way to build vocabulary are very very similar to Korean Language! And when they dance, they raise the arms up. We Korean people also raise the arms up when we dance Falk Dance in group...kzread.info/dash/bejne/iJxss9WPmdK2pLQ.htmlsi=f5MBZ2Pim3RFXy0F

I'm cuban-american with Basque ancestry and Rh negative blood , Basques are the group of people who have the most rare Rh negative O blood , then the North African berbers and then it's all Europeans , Sardinians and more . Too many theories to go by , no one knows where they came from , we are all mixed .

Place names last longest everywhere.

@briansaul4707

2 жыл бұрын

I've often wondered about GALICIA (Kingdom of... in today's Ukraine, I believe) and GALICIA (NW Spain).

@briansaul4707

2 жыл бұрын

Gaul ?

@troubadude

2 жыл бұрын

@@briansaul4707 And Galicia and Cilicia (hard C), an area on the Mediterranean coast of modern Turkey which was once an Armenian kingdom (in ancient times!)

I'm from the Rio grande valley of Texas I'my DNA test 35 Spanish 28 native American and 11% Basque

The Basque Country (Euskal Herria) is the "far west" of the former Armenia. In urartian period there was no relationship between the two brother o sister countrys. While urartu was a rich civilization due to the canalization of water and agriculture, with written language, etc, the basque land was habited by sheperds and fishers, in a simple way of life, apart from the middle of the civilization (more than 20 civilizations have existed in tigris-eufrates area, one of them urartu-biainili). The irrigation sistem came to the south of the basque country in X. century (1000 years ago, thanks to the muslims that conquered spain). But if we compare megalitos of 7.500 years ago in armenia (zorats karer) we see the same style of stone circles than in the basque country, but much bigger. It seems that all in armenia is tree times bigger than in the basque country (Ararat mountain 5000 metres high-Aralar mountain 1500metres high). Astronomical knowledge was much better in armenia, in the basque country the clouds are often in the sky. We could study too the possibility of ships by sea for the relationship, through the mediterranean sea. Regarding to sheperds, I calculate that a group of sheeps could be guided from basqueland to armenia o viceversa in one year and a half, 4500 kms, 10 km/day.