Anyone else that Belegar shouldn’t have an Age of Reckoning until he takes Karak Eight Peaks? He is a dwarf so focused on one grudge that others think he is crazy. His grudge to retake Karak Eight Peaks should be his one and only goal.

@Morris_Minor

19 күн бұрын

true, if not this then other grudges should be partly mitigated until you resolve his main one karak eight peaks. It would definitely also set his faction apart from other dawi factions which I think they should do, otherwise they'll be too samey. But yeah I agree with ur comment

@Loj84

19 күн бұрын

He’s already punished pretty hard before taking Eight Peaks with the 50% extra upkeep. Considering the second stage no longer has any negatives, removing AoR would almost certainly punish him even more relative to the other dwarf factions. If anything, it’d be cool if he got special themed grudges on the path to eight peaks rather than the standard ones everyone else gets.

@sprintstothebathroomdaily2429

19 күн бұрын

It makes sense but I think it'd make his play rate even lower If I were a betting man I'd say Belegar is probably one of the least played lords (might be different post patch)

@ojphoenix7

19 күн бұрын

Definitely worth considering, but it may be too early to tell. I look forward to giving it a swing

@ashesofaranea

19 күн бұрын

@@sprintstothebathroomdaily2429 i think ever since wh3 people prolly play more beleger, his campaign is not nearly as hard imo as it was in wh2

Do not shame your ancestors dawi brethren 🗿

@Battleseyttv

19 күн бұрын

Khazukan Kazakit-ha!

@joshuahandlen9885

19 күн бұрын

@@Battleseyttv I'm disappointed that Google lied about it's ability to translate this.

@4dealliance598

19 күн бұрын

​@@joshuahandlen9885 "The stoney people are upon you!" "The Dwarfs are upon you!"

This is great news. The control debuff was a massive pain, especially on harder difficulties and on top of that, with the growth debuff, I couldn't build up enough control buildings in the settlement to offset the control debuff, so you ended up having to just turtle along with armies in your settlements sapping up any extra gold you had.

One thing I'm curious about is Thorgrim's ability to buff his army against enemies with 1000+ grudges. If enemies accrue less grudges overall, is it less likely that the conditions for his ability will activate? Does this unintentionally nerf that ability?

@Croltown

16 күн бұрын

if u play on VH, VH difficulty. the grudges i've seen accumulate on settlements and on enemey armies are well above 4000+

@TheAussieBlue

5 күн бұрын

On normal difficulty, if an enemy army sacks three different level 3 settlements they'll easily be in the 1000+ range.

High quality patch review, thank you soo much sir

Once you complete the age of reckoning goal, it should bypass the extra turns and give you the benefit the next turn. Also, remove the doubling grudge costs dor confederation of minor non LL factions, It makes dwarfs quite isolationist with their own kin, and could make the campaign more annoying

@Loj84

19 күн бұрын

Agreed on the second part. On the first one, I like it, but it’d be a bit hard to make the grudge settler armies work with that. If the first army goes away when you complete the goal and a second one spawns, that could really screw someone over if they needed that first army right away. But if a second one spawned while the first one was still running, that could be a bit too op.

@kingmike_gamingvods

19 күн бұрын

@@Loj84 I didn’t think of that, maybe just simply continuing the grudge count would be sufficient

@tobiasnenseter8044

19 күн бұрын

@@Loj84 What about giving the Public order and growth immediately? That would incentivize building up you provinces while waiting for the turn timer and new age of reckoning to get your new grudge army and grudge settler units. It would be kind of 3 phases, where phase one is "campaigning/grudge setteling", phase two is rebuilding while waiting/preparing for a new age and phase 3 is for getting new recruits and a grudge army to then go to phase 1 again.

@Loj84

19 күн бұрын

@@tobiasnenseter8044 That could work, but it doesn't address the issue of how it feels counterproductive to clear grudges when you're already at 100%. I did think of one potential solution after writing that comment. They could start a new age immediately, but instead of despawning your existing grudge settler army and spawning a new one, they could simply refresh your existing one. Extend the timer on it by 15 turns, bring every unit to full health, replace any lost units, and maybe add on a few elite units as well as a reward for completing the age early.

They still haven't fixed Slayer pirates.They don't always shoot, even if they do the animation while moving.And they still don't have proper death blow where they do one attack when they die like normal slayers .Is that just me?

@DrunkenManic

19 күн бұрын

The deathblow issue applies to every slayer unit that doesn't have dual weapons.

@Unknown-lf2kl

19 күн бұрын

@@DrunkenManic Giant slayers who are not dual wielding still, thus the last blow like The slayers would dual axis. I also noticed that the doom seekers don't do it, so it's most likely a glitch for the new units. Unless you know something, I don't.

@khelgarironfist3301

19 күн бұрын

It took a while for giant slayers to get it, which just use the regular dual-wielding animations of normal slayers, which looks janky af.

@Unknown-lf2kl

19 күн бұрын

@@khelgarironfist3301 But why do the new Slayer units not get it?I don't mind a little janky This makes sense for the new Slayers to have that too.

@Unknown-lf2kl

19 күн бұрын

@@khelgarironfist3301 Also beautiful profile picture.

No, but it's an improvement. Don't think the grudge increase for confederations with minor factions was fixed and the Oak of Ages landmark could also use bonus damage for Bolt Throwers. Belegar's personal skill line is kind of shite when he's all about tunnel fighting but doesn't provide bonuses to Irondrakes. Should take that off Grombrindal and give it to him and instead give the Ranger stuff to Bugman once we inevitably get him in the game. There also seem to be inconsistencies with the Wards of Grimnir passive for Slayers, depending how it worked on the tabletop. Found an excerpt from 7th edition that said ALL Slayers could get it, but nothing conclusive for 8th. Could also use even more landmarks like one in Zhufbar that affects cannons or a special port in Barak Varr and so on.

What i would love to have still changed: Grudges collected shown as a resource between Oathgold and the AoR meter. Grudge settlers bought by grudges and not money. if you chose to end the AoR you can force start a new with some grudges costs depend on how many turns left to a new AoR If you get 100% the AoR ends immediately and you can choose a new one or to end it as if the timer ran out.

I normally play on hard/hard and up the difficulty once I'm late game. I played 80ish turns of Malakai Makaisson and never got past the 3/5 age of reckoning usually I ended it 2/5 getting debuffs. I prefer having only a few armies and building tall while still pushing consistently with my few armies. Glad for the changes even if the legendary power gamers feel it will make things too easy. I love the dwarves and had to stop my campaign partway because it was so frustrating so this is welcome news.

Okay first game after the patch, turn 33, checked how many grudes I need as Karaz-a-Karak, 32'700 grudes...

I started my Malakai campaign yesterday with new patch 5.03. It feels good after like 10 turns. My only objection is RNG. When I defeated initial Nurgle foe, I wanted to strike Skavens, but they didn't want to be catched with pants off, so I reloaded save multiple times. Every time it changed grudge dilema to declare war between Kislev, Chaos, or Skaven. I ended up with additional save reloading till it turned to Skaven.

I know this isn't relevant to the age of reckoning changes, but to the dwarfs atleast. Regarding the whirlwind of death changes for doomseekers, what does "explosion force" do? It seems like mostly a nerf across the board for the ability unless this is a relevant positive change.

This is just me this is my chill game I like to play while high and watching something or listening to music. I use some modes but it's nice to have things easier just for the confederation for me. I play campaigns into the 100's over time and enjoy to be able to easily do things. When I want a challenge I slide the bars up or make a new campaign with that as a goal.

12:40 About a carryover mechanic, what about it giving you the rewards immediately and then start a new age next turn? Maybe that would be to snowbally :/ Or it could give the Public order and growth bonus immediately, incentivizing you to build up and lick wounds for a few turns, without making you feel like you are missing out? I would also prefer it if the grudge army would be able to replenish as it is supposed to last for 15 turns, and it can not be buffed by lords and heroes. I am ok with the grudge settler units costing to recruit, but I wish the armies did not have such small unit capacity for grudge settler units, as they promote player agency in the early game and give variance

I am an absolute dwarf fan by any means! I still decided to wait for the fix too and just started my first Cathay campaign with Yuan Bo. :D Can't wait to start my next dwarf campaign.. but its difficult.. Malakai cuz hes new? Ungrimm cuz he's the slayer king? Or maybe my all time favorite Belegar. :3

@fizzbrew

19 күн бұрын

Malakai for the story element and getting the boys from the start

Good video thanks.

Came here to check if minor faction confederation was still being punished as it wasn't mentioned. Sad to see the answer is yes, but thanks for the good coverage of the update! On the scaling with difficulty, it might be CA being aware of the issue that come with having fewer fights on easy campaign difficulty and wanting the mechanic to work for everyone. Not sure, but it looks like it could be good change.

@anon4854

19 күн бұрын

Confederating minor factions is one of my favorite things to do as Dwarfs. It feels like making the Dawi Empire whole as opposed to letting them die out. Especially playing as Thorgrim.

@arthanor9631

19 күн бұрын

@@anon4854 Indeed! I also like to do that, as most factions. I guess now you gotta maintain the "independence" of the minor dwarf holds until you get all the legendary lords. Military alliance and gifting settlements so they get at least a whole province it is until then! (or until you confed all the LLs)

@anon4854

19 күн бұрын

@@arthanor9631 AoR has sadly put me off playing the Dawi entirely. They were my favorite faction as well which is why I'm so tilted by the changes. Luckily I still have TWW2 installed.

@arthanor9631

19 күн бұрын

@anon4854 it's a weird thing to apply so much pressure on the player to play a certain way. Many a dawi campaign was slow and purposeful, which was fitting. Now, alternating between being aggressive then passive (because killing targets or talking settlements while not in the age feels like a waste of potentially good grudges) seems more like a moody slaaneshy cultists raiding then enjoying, not a very deliberate dawi. I think the turn thing is all wrong. Too short and it doesn't work, too long and it locks you into a playstyle you might not want. Maybe it would be better as a dynamic thing, sort of like how public order is now. 0 at the center, you gain (negative) unsettled grudges every turn, meaning your people get grumpy if you do nothing. Settling grudges (positive) either helps to keep you in the stage you are at, or pushes you further towards a higher tier. Could use exactly the same interface: Leftmost: Control debuff, unsettled (negative) grudges accumulate slowly as people lose faith and move on. Diplomatic bonuses as you are easy going. More income from trade. Construction cost bonus. (Apparently you struggle, so the game makes it easier to get allies/stay out of wars and get/save some money) Center left: minor control debuff but recruitment cost buff (people are grumpy, but that also makes willing to fight). (You're doing OK, just need a bit more of an army!) Center: no effect Center right: growth buffs, minor upkeep and construction time reduction (people are happy, the armies are motivated so require less to keep them standing, builders are also motivated so work gets done). Chance of grudgesettler units added to pool every turn, like warrior of chaos. (The you're doing well tier) Rightmost: People get vindictive, upkeep and recruitment cost bonus, oathgold production bonus, more grudgesettler units overtime and the possibility to summon an army with some cooldown. Unsettled grudges accumulate fast as people let nothing pass, knowing their king is an avenger. Diplomatic penalties. (You're doing too well, so here are tools to get things done, but you might have to do it alone, which is quite alright, and might get more enemies, which you can probably handle, the rampaging/challenge/Legend tier). Overall, each tier has its uses, with the two right tiers being most desirable and the last one being good but not free.

@garymcjerry

19 күн бұрын

⁠@@anon4854ngl, I really don’t get why people don’t just ignore the system. I understand it can be a bad feeling loop, but if you take a step back, it’s just numbers. It didn’t *actually change much. Still the same dwarves really imo. I get that you guys “feel” like you have to be this aggressive expansionist empire, but you don’t. You can totally sit and grumble in your holds until T4 if you want. It’s just now you feel as if you could get *more* if you were aggressive. I’m not going to lie tho, that’s the game. You did better as old dwarves by being aggressive too. There’s never going to be a faction that’s more beneficial to be defensive in campaign (defensive on battle 100%, but not campaign). It’s all about resource management technically at the end of the day. You want more, you want everyone else to have less. Idk, feel free to give your take on why it doesn’t work anymore. Genuinely curious. Anyone feel free to give a take really. Would be cool to get the other side’s perspective.

Please tell me if it makes any sense or not: Take the turns away completely for the build up and make it harder to reach the age of reckoning. Then let the ‚Age’ of reckoning last for some rounds while getting extra bonuses for smashing gobbos and chorfs (or anyone whispering „short“ somewhere). That way everyone can play at their own pace and are incentivised at certain key moments to fight others to overcome challenging opponents. For balancing, maybe get like a soft cooldown that weakens the next age of reckoning if reached again too quickly. Otherwise I'd just suggest that AoR kicks off as soon as you are at 100%, make it stronger the earlier you reach it and let it have a debuff/decline phase after that like scaling down other grudges, since you’ve already grudged a minute ago.

@l.m.srensen4559

19 күн бұрын

I’d maybe suggest a 3-5 turn delay if you finish your AoR early. The previous version of AoR actually made it so I never even once got the 100%, so I don’t even know how long this temporary army lasts..?

@SunlessSage

19 күн бұрын

​@@l.m.srensen4559 Those armies lasted 10 turns, assuming they're around that long since they don't replenish out of combat.

Does Malakai still have his arcane item slot?

Will this work for existing campaigns or do we have to restart ?

Love the feature of confederating endgame scenario dwarfes with the book to get free upkeep armies 7/10 feature

OUR CLANS WILL SHUN US!

The thing that age of reckoning is now last for15 turns just doesn't mean anything. Why? Because the total score of grudges that you should complete has been increased as well. So, it changes the only thing, that player should be aggressive not for 10 turns but for 15 now. Right now playing for Thorgrim is hell. Because for turn 30 I should close 15000 grudges, when my score in previous age was 3500. The system is still awful AF. We need some limit on maximum amount of grudges and proper grudges number for enemy's settlements so it won't be 30000 by turn 50 when all nearby settlements have 100-200 grudges cost at best. P.S. Everything in dark lands cost 3 to 100 grudges. Wtf, are chaos dwarfs friends to dawi now?

I still believe that they should just copy the orcs mechanic and let dwarfs declare an Age of Reckoning against a faction and we just settle grudges againts that race/faction instead of the timed system we have now meself, be more Lore friendly and fun to manage.

As Belegar you HAVE TO confaderate the 1st settelment. That's the only way for you to get a grudgethrower.

Consider one grudge satisfied

For sure system gonna need some more polish, but it will be much better now. Bugman's for all!

@anon4854

19 күн бұрын

Still forced time pressure which sucks. It needs to be changed to the Waaagh system so players have agency rather than feeling pushed to play the game a certain way. Declare an AoR on a target, fight war, receive rewards, cooldown, repeat. Tried and true.

@morgothbauglir8706

18 күн бұрын

@@anon4854 the game is called total war warhammer its surely not that bad to get couple of battles in that 15 turn to get out of negative seriously whats wrong with yall

With Malakai I went from never hitting the max AoR to hitting the first 2 fairly easily. But Malakai is a bit more aggressive because of his adventures.

ahhh shame that i already started a malakai campaign... seems like the changes didnt carry over

Suggestion for a buff: Dwarf Miners do 50% more damage to Gates. The description from the Miners says "Good Against Gates" but I see no differences between Miners and other dwarf units

CA should also add a button to reset the grudge once u maxed it for player who want a more aggressive game, well I guess mod would solve it.

I NEED MY THUNDERBARGES AS THEY WERE THEIR RANGE IS SHIT NOW

Nice to not be punished for getting trade agreements lol

Only thing lacking in this patch is fixing hero's/lord's traits. Not bad.

Honestly? Having played a bit of the new system now i cant help but think about how different it could have been though... A point shop if you will? A system much like the one we have now. Kill things get grudges all that good stuff. But instead of a tired "you get this if you do this much" It would instead be a page where you could SPEND grudges on the buffs. Oh want more growth ok thats 5k. Grudge slayers? few hundred. Iron drakes maybe 1k or so. That way you still have to WORK for the stuff you want and the powerful stuff but it isnt this time sensitive thing at all. It REWARDS you for striking the grudges but if you take a turn to consolidate its no big deal because lets be honest how many years has the status quo been going on now with them? Another year wont hurt while i build a school.

Belegar needs better faction buffs, same as grombrindal and thorgrim.. Malakai has very good faction buffs, and mechanics of his journey while belegar Has leadership when in tunnel warfare? Has some lame bonus after getting K8P , that's not even close to what Malakai Has or empire did get ..Cmmon.. Grombrindal with his 50/60 procent more distance to ally armies lol .. They need to rework them like they did with Empire.. Elspeth, Karl franz and gelt get quite good reworks

@tobiasnenseter8044

19 күн бұрын

Do not forget Grombrindals extra hate for elgi! Defiantly very good for the whole campaign and not just a fluffy thing

@Loj84

19 күн бұрын

I’m not saying you’re wrong, but I think you’re being a bit unfair to grombrindal and belegar. Unless they’ve nerfed it a lot since I last played him, belegar does not have “some lame bonus” for taking K8P. It’s a pretty big bonus. He could use some love in other areas but that part is nice as is. And Grombrindal doesn’t just get +50% extra reinforcement range. His unique skill line includes factionwide boosts to campaign movement range, unit recruit rank, and more. It’s arguably the strongest skill line the dwarfs have.

@nikodemborowski796

19 күн бұрын

@@Loj84 you Missunderstand what I had in mind I think, Those factions have so useless bonuses its better to play other faction to confederate them, why I should start grombrindal when I can start malakai and confederate grombrindal, belegar using him. I have grombrinal factionwide skills and I dont have to play lame faction. If you played a lot you should get it. Everyone who played dwarfs a lot gets it. You only Maybe Play them for the lore mostly or their campaign location , not for their mechanic or faction bonus...

@Loj84

19 күн бұрын

@@nikodemborowski796 Trust me, I have played dwarfs a *lot* -- they're like 80% of my playtime from WH1-WH3. Again, I'm not saying you're wrong in your conclusion (I'd agree that they could use some love), I'm just disagreeing with the extreme that you're going to. Grombrindal's bonuses are far from useless. You're ignoring the living ancestor mechanic. It's not an interesting mechanic and it's not as good as most of the others, but it does have meaningful bonuses. And, considering how early you can get Grombrindal's strongest skills, simply having access to him from the start is a significant bonus as well. As for Belegar, I just looked it up halfway through writing this comment and apparently his bonuses for taking K8P have been nerfed. I can't find what they were changed to, but I'll concede that one. He had some pretty strong bonuses in WH2 at least.

@nikodemborowski796

19 күн бұрын

@@Loj84 yes but you talking about Grombrindal himself, I talking about factions. Malakai has even better bonuses organ guns with 50procent more range( journey) And end of discussion lol. Only empire got rework so good that I actually prefer to play now empire more than dwarfs. Bc gelt, elsbeth and Karl have great bonuses. I Play each campaign separate bc Its fun and they have their bonuses actually good. Tbh now I only play Malakai in dwarf faction bc of his mechanic, buffs to artillery in his journey.. His faction bonuses are great, mechanic great, lord himself is good.

I was using a great Age of Reckoning mod that I really enjoyed... Made grudge totals needed for new ages based on % of the previous age... I'm guessing that's broken now. F.

@Loj84

19 күн бұрын

I was using that as well and thought it was an improvement, but a bit too easy. I’m happy to try this version now.

They're just short of being perfect!

I'd like the ability to spend grudges to shorten AoR time.

System doesn't fit with Dawi. They don't wander the world settling grudges. It forces too much aggression for Dwarf's counter to their actual Warhammer lore.

@kristof6472

14 күн бұрын

Isnt the fourth period of the dwarves the age of reckoning where they go and kill all the umgi around

i'm afraid you'll get too much now and it would be too easy / wasted. I started my Malakai campaing on 5.0.2 and the only moment i got less than tier 3 is when i traveled from north of kislev to kill vlad (he had like 10K grudge in total to claim) and with just him i finished 2x 10 turns with tier 4 reward. I don't know if other dwarves faction are having it harder than malakai but for me it was very easy. Turns 1-20, WoC, wulfric, throgg, azazel 20-30 finishing norsca & took several turn to get close to vlad & drycha (when i got tier 2 > -1 autority) 30-50 vlad the the grudge geyser. (+ a bit of dried up wood for campfire called drycha) 50-60 the vegans extremist near bretonnia 60-80, skryre clan alone funded my whole campaign money & grudge requirement 1k to 1.5k per battles, it goes up fast when they bring 4 stack to my malakai grapeshot doomstack. thanks for being skavens, skavens. I'm on turn 80 right now and wurzzag will give me 2k grudges per settlement & army.

If you maxed out your grudges it should auto start the next one immediately.

@brentonherbert7775

19 күн бұрын

Which then lands you RIGHT back where we were before with non stop warring because there's very little time to stop and breath if you actually want to get those higher ranks.

@morgothbauglir8706

18 күн бұрын

@@brentonherbert7775 how is that a problem when the game is called total war you can upgrade your armies on the go

@brentonherbert7775

18 күн бұрын

@@morgothbauglir8706 Because we dont all play forces of chaos. Or Beastman. And... you know... Organising armies is GENERALLY an important thing? What kind of dumb smooth brained question is "HoW Is ThaT A PrOBlEm" you HAVE played the game yes?

@morgothbauglir8706

18 күн бұрын

@@brentonherbert7775 you can still do that in dwarves doesnt mean its broken because you are dumb tired of these no brainer whinings of yall

@morgothbauglir8706

18 күн бұрын

@@brentonherbert7775 at this point i shouldnt even argue with you brainless whiners i could wait another 50 years and you guys still would find a way to whine because of your own dumbness keep playing on easy and brain storm "organising armies" this game isnt that complicated bro

For me i play campaigns until about turn 200ish.

Surely that's true to the lore, you are being punished for being a dwarf 😎😘👉🏻👉🏻

Finding the new Dwarf Campaign a bit boring. I think i should of picked another Lord.

I want to play Dwarfs, not bloody Khorne!

I like it that they are listening to feedback, but some stuff still need work. Slayer pirates feel bad at everything they do, and kinda don't really have a spot even in campaign. Belegar has no real specific buffs for grudge settler units, so his campaign might be the least favored by the mechanic, even more now that grudge settlers aren't free. And most importantly, doomseekers are way too overpriced right now, and don't even get enough value back when fighting their ideal targets. Dragon slayer hero also feels a bit useless for the dwarfs in multiplayer, and bring no unit buffs in campaign

@techelitesareadisease8816

19 күн бұрын

Slayer pirates are good in MP. Doomseekers are decent as well, use them like monstrous inf by inundating them inside other units like miners or warriors. Not great but elite inf is rarely all that impressive.

@nelsonelloi3770

19 күн бұрын

@@techelitesareadisease8816 doesn't work that well, they dont have the mass to work like monstrous infantry in the middle of chaff

@techelitesareadisease8816

19 күн бұрын

@@nelsonelloi3770 Very true. In general elite inf is just a very difficult archetype to make work for MP. Being expensive and immobile (compared to cavalry, monsters, flyers, etc) tends to mean they just get shot to pieces or fight some expendable chaff a 10th of their cost for half the battle

@nelsonelloi3770

19 күн бұрын

@@techelitesareadisease8816 it tanks your balance of power, since you pay so much on squishy units that lose health so fast and can't get their value back, unless you spend a lot of precious micro

a 100 mb hotfix patch destroyed 30+ of my active mods... They really gotta stop pushing out their updates and start making it optional..

I feel like any dwarf settlements that tied to non dwarf settlements should be split 8:56 like Karak Angazha should be separate from Akendorf because of the climate debuff or they can make the dwarfs only be able to fully colonise dwarven settlements and have certain buffs to it but other settlement can only be a outpost, similar with the Warriors of Chaos Dark settlements and outpost

In a word: No

I’m thinking I am the minority but I just don’t like the age of reckoning mechanic at all. I preferred the old mechanic. If they kept that but added in all the unique rewards you get for finishing the legendary grudges, I personally would have been happy.

@morgothbauglir8706

18 күн бұрын

yes you are

I hate this patch. It broke my mods. 😞

@arthanor9631

19 күн бұрын

Did it really break them, or do they just list as not updated? Because the vast majority of the patch is dB changes, except for the AoR stuff, so it should be quite mod friendly.

Personally I think the dwarfs are still terrible to play, unlike their chaos cousins they have nothing good going for them. They feel like a generic faction with something not great added on. The new dwarf racial mechanic really isn't that great compared to other races.

The system is still a complete joke of a rework. A discount version of a waagh clone on a timer. Yay. I will never understand how CA could fumble the Dwarf rework so badly.

@hugon3895

19 күн бұрын

The funny fact is that I play dwarfs because I prefer to play defensive faction instead of aggressive one. I never played Greenskins and never will but CA makes me play "them" while choosing dwarfs :|

@jakubs.5966

19 күн бұрын

@@hugon3895 STOP SHAMING YOUR SLAYER ANCESTORS!

@hugon3895

19 күн бұрын

@@jakubs.5966 :D

@morgothbauglir8706

18 күн бұрын

@@hugon3895 the game is called total war warhammer its surely not that bad to get couple of battles in that 15 turn to get out of negative seriously whats wrong with yall

Talking by getting punished only by existing, where is the growth hero for dwarfs?🥲