"Amir Al Bahr" , became "Amiral" in French and " Admiral" In English

@SABDBL

Ай бұрын

This is an example of loan words

@MohammadAslamMagsi

Ай бұрын

In Sindhi an Indian language we call it mir bahar

@mirtalpur739

Ай бұрын

@@MohammadAslamMagsiin Sindhi it’s also Amir Al bahr but after Baluch conquest it became Mir Al bahr

@MohammadAslamMagsi

Ай бұрын

@@mirtalpur739 bro our elders narrate stories. They call it mir bahar. Wallah Allam

İn Azerbaijan language (azerbaijanian turkish) 60 % may be even more are Arabic . There for it is easy to remember new words for us . Elhamdullilah

@ramiz313

Ай бұрын

Niyə yalan danışırsan axı hardan altmış faiz oldu? Özünüzdən rəqəm uydurmağı elə sevirsiz ki

@inamplanet7796

19 күн бұрын

@@ramiz313 ailə, zəif, səadət, müəllim, sual, maaş, bədii, mətbəə, aləm, məna, elan, xüsusi, səliqə, rəng, rəsm, rəssam, rəf, məktub, vəfa, ticarət, sirr, həll, hiss, xətt, tibb, hədd, nəsr − nasir − mənsur; şəkil − təşkil − mütəşəkkil; eşq − aşiq − məşuq − məşuqə, məktəb, məktub, kitab, katib, dərs, tədris, mədrəsə, sinif, elm, Allah, rəbb, islam, peyğəmbər, məscid, müsəlman, inam, səcdə, ilahi, həcc, axirət, cənnət, şeytan və ilaxır... adlardanƏkbər, Zəhra, Ömər, Cəfər, Həsən, Əli, Fatma,..........

@inamplanet7796

19 күн бұрын

@@ramiz313 dilçilik elminilə maraqlanın. Burda yazdıqlarım sözləri hər gün istifadə olunanlardı. Ərəb mənşəlidir. Və burda heç bir qəbahət yoxdu. Sözlər daha çox var. Maraqlıdırsa elminkitablara nəzər salın və ya özünüz elmə üz tutun. Salamat!

@ramiz313

19 күн бұрын

@@inamplanet7796 mən demədim e ərəb dilinə məxsus sözlər az işlənir Azərbaycan dilində mən dedim ki 60 faizi hardan aldın Hansi kitabda yazılıb axı o faiz?

You are talking specifically about the connection between Arabic and European languages. A lot of Asian, African, Aboriginal and Native American languages have nothing to do with Arabic.

@egs3470

Ай бұрын

Yep. Just look at the languages that never had contact with Arabic and the Middle East and you’ll see how baseless his claims are. I’d love to see him try to show how Chinese or Korean words come from Arabic roots - there just isn’t any relation at all

@user-yn1ur5us8r

25 күн бұрын

I am Somali and I assure you that many Somali terms are derived from Arabic, and some terms have disappeared and the Arabic term remained, such as “time” which is “waqti” = وقت.

@LyingOstrich

25 күн бұрын

Thank you.

@frankeinstein719

25 күн бұрын

@@user-yn1ur5us8r of course, because Somali people had lots of interactions with Arabs. But I’m not talking about you.

@egs3470

25 күн бұрын

@@user-yn1ur5us8r Somali is related to Arabic, but thousands (yes, literally thousands) of other African languages have no relation to Arabic at all

30% of Urdu is Arabic … it truly elevates the Hindi into a beautiful poetic language

@IDKWhat0

Ай бұрын

30% Persian AND Arabic, more common words are often from Persian because Arabic words are from Persian, not directly Arabic

@SabeerAbdulla

Ай бұрын

Urdu is much older than Hindi and Hindi borrows a lot from Urdu.

@xandercage6944

Ай бұрын

The standardized form of Urdu is older than the standardized form of Hindi.

@blackrock_cock

Ай бұрын

@@IDKWhat0 Bassam Al-Rabiah, professor of Persian literature at King Saud University, contributed that “The Persian Language Academy in Tehran confirms that the Arabic language constitutes about 60% of the vocabulary of the Persian language.”

@blackrock_cock

Ай бұрын

@@IDKWhat0 There has been a literary and cultural exchange between Persians and Arabs since pre-Islamic times, but for every foreign Persian word there is an Arabic word that corresponds to it in meaning, and there is not a single foreign Persian word in the Qur’an.

Although Arabic is a very beautiful and rich ancient language, especially Quranic Arabic, which has influenced many other languages, it couldn't be the case that all other languages originated somehow from Arabic, because the Arabic language can't be older than the prophet Ibrahim or Ismail pbut and from modern historical science we know that these prophets lived approximately 5000 - 5500 years ago. Moreover, even when the prophet Ibrahim left Mesopotamia (Iraq) for Palestine, he spoke the language of his fathers, the Mesopotamian language, which is different from ancient Arabic of the times of prophet Muhammad pbuh or ancient Hebrew of the prophets Musah and Harun pbut.

@neohybridkai

Ай бұрын

Yes I also believe that the origin of language is far older than Arabic and it may no longer exists now, and that doesn't lower my respect toward Arabic as the language of Qur'an

@someone_7233

Ай бұрын

No Who told you arabic is not ancient or that it didnt exist before the time of ismail peace be upon him? Jarham , the first arabic *tribe* to live in makka , after asking permission from hajar , the mother ismail himself , jarham was speaking arabic (an ancient way of arabic that died eventually) and ismail learned it from them Also , there was Thamod and A'ad (with the mighty city of Erum), two great people of arabia who existed well before ibrahim ,Erum itself was mentioned by Phoenicians almost 10 thousands years ago , theyre known btween arabs as the "arab bae'dah" or extinct arabs, theyre the forefathers of arab civilization and theyre ethnic arab Fyi , arabs are divided into 2 categories, 3 are subcategories: 1)arab ba'edah or "extinct arabs" (extinct arab tribes like A'ad, Thamod, and the nabatians).... 2)arab arebah or "arab arabs" (the arab tribes who still live to this day and age, those who can trace their lineage back to known ancient arab tribes) those too are ethnic arabs who the language was born in their communities and civilization 2) arab musta'arebah or "arabnized arabs" the arabs that werent ethnic arabs but their mother language is arab, like alot of people in north africa or some minorities in different areas around the arab world ... Being an ethnic arab or an arabnized arab doesnt really make a difference tho , scholars argue that if your mother tongue is arabic , then youre an arab , regardless of your lineage

@nureke-dp1nw

Ай бұрын

@@someone_7233 as far as I know Arabs consider themselves as descendants of prophet Ismail pbuh and his twelve sons. If so, how could his ancestors be Arabs and speak Arabic? Those ancient nations you mentioned were not Arabs, but nations who lived in the Arabic peninsula or in the Middle East. Maybe their languages were close to later Arabic, but those languages were not Arabic. Don't be like Jews who claim that prophets Ibrahim, Nuh, and Adam pbut were Jews and spoke Hebrew. Probably, all Sematic languages originated from the language of Mesopotamia, where prophet Ibrahim pbuh was born and grew up.

@flowerinkplant

Ай бұрын

As far as i know, Ibrahim was praying in Quran " i settle my offspring in the uncultivated valley, close to your sacred house, ... Make people's hearts turn to them." This means there was tribe live near that Area, that was the Arab Musta'ribah

@nureke-dp1nw

Ай бұрын

@@flowerinkplant it doesn’t mean it was a tribe there. Prophet Ismail’s mother couldn’t find any water in the area for a while and ran between the tops of two hills Safa and Marua to see if there any water sources in the area, while the baby was crying. At that time, prophet Ibrahim pbuh had already moved to the modern Palestinian land from modern Iraqi land, and he was quite old. When his second son, prophet Ishaq (Isaak) was born, he was too old.

I'm not an Arab, but subhanallah arabic is the greatest language in the world, I mean God the almighty picked it for the final revelation.

@FactsWithActs

Ай бұрын

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhIt is literally the richest language in the world, cry

@thecoolnewsguy

Ай бұрын

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh🤡

@zeirabalhabob7458

Ай бұрын

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhjust because you don't understand it and find it hard doesn't mean it's the same for everyone, it is the richest language in the world that's a fact and it's very easy to speak, and it's the language of the Holy Qur'an and what People will speak in heaven insha'Allah... Indeed it's a superior language above others!

@africankidd3642

Ай бұрын

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhIt’s the richest language definitely. English is dry and full of stolen words. Guess what language is the original of most of the stars in the sky’s names.. Many Arabic texts cannot be translated to weak English. And the script is its own art.

@larsapher

Ай бұрын

@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh came together with Arabic... when Greek girls wanted Egyptian property on the Nile and the only way to get it was to industrialize conflict... the original sin of property ownership

"[Proto-Indo-European] is hypothesized to have been spoken as a single language from approximately 4500 BCE to 2500 BCE [...] though estimates vary by more than a thousand years. Wikipedia Languages evolve so fast that no language spoken at the time of classical Arabic could have remained similar enough to be considered the same language since proto-Indo-European began to be spoken.

@MAbuRowais

Ай бұрын

You never know.

@egs3470

Ай бұрын

@@MAbuRowais Yes, we know, lol. You can look at the historical record, ancient inscriptions, old texts, and see how different the language used was from the one we have today.

"Tall" didn't mean tall until about 500 years ago. Its similarity to an Arabic word is probably coincidental. Though one can speculate whether the change in meaning was influenced by Arabic. "The sense of "being of more than average height (and slim in proportion to height)" probably evolved out of earlier meanings "brave, valiant, seemly, proper" (c. 1400), "attractive, handsome" (late 14c.), also "large, big" (mid-14c.), as sometimes in Modern English, colloquially. The sense evolution is "remarkable," says OED (1989), but it notes that adjectives applied to persons can wander far in meaning (such as pretty, buxom, German klein "small, little," which in Middle High German meant the same as its English cognate clean (adj.))." Etymonline

@NeoYas

Ай бұрын

Altus (height) is a latin word, from arabic Al-tul الطول, which gave us alto in spanish. In sanscrit we have uttAla with the same meaning, at-tula. الطول.

@anderslvolljohansen1556

Ай бұрын

@@NeoYas Pronounced At-tul because ط is a sun letter.

@anderslvolljohansen1556

Ай бұрын

@@NeoYas "Latin word altus comes from Proto-Indo-European *h₂el-, and later Proto-Indo-European *h₂életi (To be nourishing.)" Cooljugator

@NeoYas

Ай бұрын

@@anderslvolljohansen1556 Yes I know, that's the official hypothesis.

@anderslvolljohansen1556

Ай бұрын

@@NeoYas What makes you believe Altus came from Arabic?

40% of words that are used in my language today are either Arabic or from Arabic root. And not just similarity, they are literally same words. Also, we're only counting ones used in modern days not the whole 14 centuries.

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

Subhan Allah, which Language?

@somaliislamic2460

Ай бұрын

​@@Krassertyp7 I think that is my language which is somali

@starlonga

Ай бұрын

Probably because your language is semitic, or spoken by people who are muslims, and have been for a long time. YOUR CLAIM PROVES NOTHING!!! The claims presented in this video are OUTLANDISH and not backed up by ANY sources.

@jk-gb4et

Ай бұрын

Maltese?

@ladtm

Ай бұрын

I'm gonna guess Turkish

This is a bit over the top in my opinion (im arab by the way), the reason of similarities could be that in the golden age of islam baghdad (the capital of iraq) was the place for science and everything was written in arabic back then so the students in every part in the world used to travel to baghdad and translate books to transfer the knowledge to their country, and over time they got affected by some vocabularies (not everything could be tranlated) and it develobed overtime to become actual words Similar to whats happening now in the arab world we use lots of english words in our daily speech because everything now in English and anyone who wants to get education he must know english and some of these words actually made it to the formal language like "Computer" = "كومبيوتر" (i know this isn't a good example)

@MAm-tf4bx

Ай бұрын

حاسوب حبيبي😅

@Tomato_League

Ай бұрын

@@MAm-tf4bx عارف ي حب بس انا مش فاكر كلمة تانية 😅 حاسب آلي او حاسوب او كمبيوتر

@victoremman4639

Ай бұрын

@@Tomato_League "Computer" = "كومبيوتر" is a very lazy translation, from ignorant of arabic. The arabic word should be مِعددة or مِقسمة . So the weird word كومبيوتر is not from any linguist.

@Tomato_League

Ай бұрын

@@victoremman4639 it has multiple translations like حاسوب ، حاسب آلي ، كمبيوتر (اسم أعجمي), I just didn't have a good example

@victoremman4639

Ай бұрын

@@Tomato_League Even what you propose in not accurate, because the translation you gave took the morphem -er of computeur as a Doer, so the alif in حاسوب . In latin languages we say Ordinateur, means Ordinate so root صفف could be another way to name Computer. If you considere a Computer in not an A doer, so the arabic prefix should be Mi-, a tool, not a Doer.

@Arabic 101 This is a very flawed claim: Three major problems: 1. having more root words does not make a language the source of another language with lesser roots.. a language that has been influenced by multiple other languages will also have many roots and often those roots have similar meaning, example; English being influenced by Romance (latin) and Germanic (anglo-saxon) has more roots than either. 2. Why no mention of years, places and time periods when discussing language history (etmology) the oldest evidence of the existence of arabic is not much before Islam.. Arabic belongs to the Semitic group of languages of which Aramaic and Hebrew are much older. Semitic languages themselves belong to Afro-Asiatic languages which are much older and have been the origin for many languages across Africa. 3. The words with similarity to english have developed less than two thousand years back and mainly after the Islamic conquests and via Arab traders. If Arabic is the origin of these languages why are there no words before these influencing events??

@DinoBryce

29 күн бұрын

In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects. (I know I have commented this like 10 times but it's still important)

Arabic was the only way supposed to be the ship able to carry greatness of holly Quran

@LyingOstrich

25 күн бұрын

🤦‍♂️ No. That goes against the words of the Qur’an. It states that it was revealed in Arabic because that was the language spoken by the people of the Prophet. Had the Prophet been from France (for instance), the Qur’an would have been in French.

@ahmedharajli189

16 күн бұрын

No?

@imadmezigheche4414

10 күн бұрын

​@@LyingOstrichit's hard to believe your claims with a username like yours, besides where's your evidence from the Quran to back up your statement, think before you talk, that's if you're a real person and not just another fake account.

@LyingOstrich

10 күн бұрын

@@imadmezigheche4414 The fact that you actually think I’m untruthful just because the word “lying” is in my handle speaks volumes about how stupid you are. Anyways, here are the ayats that support my claim: 14 : 4 44 : 58 12 : 2 41 : 44

بعشق دروسك الماتِعة. زادك الله علماً ونفع بك.

Thank you for mentioning the resources. Please keep us informed about your resources in every video so we learn more from them

سبحان الله ، اللغة العربية هي اغنى واثرى لغة في العالم ، في الماضي وفي الحاضر. سبحان من اختارها لكي تكون لغة الوحي والرسالة الاخيرة لبني آدم

@darkprince6953

8 күн бұрын

in reality the video is literally him fanboying over arabic the claims are terribly wrong and contradict previous claim+ any linguist will find the video laughable

as someone who speaks a sinitic language, I don’t think arabic has influenced it much, but southeastasian languages all have had similar influences from sinitic languages. sometimes abrahamic religious people tend to have a euroasian perspective on the world and forget that there’s more to just that part of the world. but I love arabic and it was still a nice video to watch :)

@DinoBryce

29 күн бұрын

In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects. (I speak Zulu and Chinese besides English so I can confirm)

@chrissy4957

28 күн бұрын

@@DinoBryce well said! and wow so happy to hear that you speak chinese besides english and zulu 🥹🙏 that’s very cool

may ALLAH reward you❤

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

Ameen

@zaikaplates

Ай бұрын

Ameen

Subhan Allah. The Arabic language has always been one of the richest, if not the richest language in the world.

@maktabati_

12 күн бұрын

Anime is haram. Stop watching it.

@MaskedGuyCh

12 күн бұрын

@@maktabati_ The One who decides what is haram or halal is Allah (S.W.T), His messenger, and the people of knowledge (high scholars of Islam), not some random user on youtube. Also my avatar is not from an anime. Delete your comment.

Great effort! Hope you talk more about the origins of languages and the 10 Qira'at.

@FactsWithActs

Ай бұрын

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhYou haven't proven that they are lies with your theory

@AceLegend-vv5ty

Ай бұрын

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh Ye he said so many lies for examples: ... what lies, kid? bet u keep crying cuz he has no proo- nvm, maybe cuz it is stup- nvm, ur just crying because it has a link to Islam bro, man up and be Muslim.

@starlonga

Ай бұрын

@@AceLegend-vv5tythe claims in this video are OUTLANDISH. Look up the etymologies of the words in the video. Harbour is a germanic word-claiming that it’s related to Arabic is madness. Look it up yourself!!!!!!!!!

@User_00128

Ай бұрын

He did say that tho and he also went further back to its origin. Do your own research man.

@AceLegend-vv5ty

Ай бұрын

@@starlonga i cant see what my original comment said so i am unsure what ur talking about due to my poor memory but it is still a theory with some claims and facts but u don't have to accept it.

Brother, with all due respect, this video is misleading. You can believe that Arabic is a wonderful language, and acknowledge the ways in which it has heavily contributed to the vocabularies of many languages, while still being scientific about this. Firstly, every language changes. Every single one. Arabic included. Arabic as it was 1400 years ago itself was the product of millenia of changes, as is every other language. Contribution of loaned vocabulary words IS NOT the same as being the "source language" of another tongue. That's why the Persian language, for all its Arabic loans, is incomprehensible to an Arab who doesnt speak Persian. Language is more than vocabulary. It's a system that is made up of syntax rules, morphology/grammar, and phonology. Vocabulary is one portion of the system. Also, this completely goes out of the window when you compare Arabic to any Sinitic language, any Andean language - basically, anywhere not in contact with Muslims or Romans.

@stevesmith4901

Ай бұрын

The internet is filled with this sort of pseudoscience. The guy cites one obscure book by an unknown author. These people do a disservice to Arabic by making such outlandish claims. Stick to tajweed I say. Don't try to branch out into the science of linguistics if you know nothing about it.

@HOLLOWMOONLIGHT

21 күн бұрын

Exactly!

Jazaak’Allaahu khaira brother for this invaluable insight 🎉

Absolutely amazing!!! خزاك الله خيرا

@zeirabalhabob7458

Ай бұрын

*جزاك*

This video has inaccuracies. أرجو (I request, I hope) does not mean "rego" (to rule, to guide) كنس (to hide/to retreat/to sweep) does not mean "cinis" (ashes, embers, ruin, destruction) نقص (to decrease) does not mean "necesse" (necessary, needed) Anglo-Saxon ورى (creation, to kindle) does not mean "wara" (an inhabitant, to care, to guard) هون (easy) does not mean "hwon" (a few, a little) ورد (watering hole) does not mean "wyrt" (plant, vegetable, herb) English صنح (cymbal, harp) does not mean "song" هب (thinking, to move suddenly) does not mean "hop" رج (to shake) does not mean "rock" ... 75% of Latin verb roots and 80% of Anglo-Saxon verbs does not have Arabic origins. Latin and Anglo-Saxon have distinct roots in the Indo-European family, while Arabic belongs to the Afroasiatic family. Arabic has influenced European languages through trade and cultural exchanges, but not to this extent. The word "سكر" (sugar), cited as an example in the video, originates from Middle Persian (𐭱𐭪𐭥), which, in turn, derives from the Sanskrit word "शर्करा." Like all languages, Arabic has borrowed words from other languages, a process that is a natural part of linguistic evolution. Arabic isn't unique in this regard, as linguistic exchange is a universal phenomenon. The claim that words stem from Arabic instead of Latin due to the greater number of Arabic roots is logically flawed. A language having more roots doesn't imply that specific words in another language originated from it. Language development is complex, involving various influences that cannot be explained by sheer volume alone; historical interactions, trade, and cultural exchanges play a crucial role. As Muslims, we need to move beyond the idea of Arabic or Arab superiority. Arabic is a language like any other, not inherently more divine. If Allah willed, the Quran could have been revealed in any language, just as easily. To claim that Arabic was uniquely necessary for this purpose undermines Allah's boundless power.

@Omroqurba

Ай бұрын

You must be the funniest in a party, what you here said IS ALSO A THEORY. I don't know if you understand how etymology works and that everything is based mainly on suppositions because we don't have text that goes back to pre-history. He literally just showed another theory with its proofs, just say that you are an Arab hater.

@MixtureGuy

Ай бұрын

@@Omroqurba Please let me know how I am an "Arab hater" for saying Arabs aren't superior to other Muslims and if the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) was also an "Arab hater" for saying, "Verily there is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab or of a non-Arab over an Arab..." Ahmad (22978).

@Omroqurba

Ай бұрын

@@MixtureGuy WE ARE SPEAKING ABOUT ARABIC, THE LANGUAGE. AND YOU ARE ACTUALLY HATING ON ARABS, WE SEE HOW THE WEST BRAINWASHED YOU

@DinoBryce

29 күн бұрын

​@@MixtureGuyWhat you say is true! In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects.

@ahmedharajli189

16 күн бұрын

@@Omroqurbaokay first of all just because he said it’s a theory does not absolve him from critiques of this theory, and that does not allow him to blatantly lie about things in order to support it

Guys please watch the video before jumping to conclusions lol, although not all of the information here is accurate, the channel doesn't claim Arabic is the original language, he just wanted to share a theory by a researcher. Many languages in the world have been proposed to be the "original" language.

@calleha01

Ай бұрын

yeah the theory is usually referred to as proto-world. meaning a reconstructed language that branches into all languages we have today. claiming that Arabic in its current standard form is the same language as proto-world makes little sense given the changes that all languages inevitably go through. Arabic, too, surely underwent many changes before and after its standardization. It could be argued that most word roots from proto-world were preserved and passed down in Arabic though, under the assumption that the proto-world theory is correct

@Omroqurba

Ай бұрын

all the information is actually accurate, please this neutral hate shit is out of season

@calleha01

Ай бұрын

The video is trying to claim all languages come from Arabic. Which makes no sense considering the fact that there must have been a language before Arabic. Each language has a specific time period; it is impossible to keep a language alive without changing it unless it is only kept alive as a written language (which is the case with both Fusha Arabic and Latin, for example). The time period for spoken Fusha Arabic is approx. 600-800 AD and if you count Old Arabic which is a different language(s) the time period goes back to maybe 900 BC. It is clear that the author has heavily studied Arabic and has a great deal of appreciation for the language, but it doesn't seem like he has studied Philology, which is needed to understand a topic such as this one. Word cognates are expected to be found across most languages in the world, whether all languages come from the same source or not. Trace back Arabic far enough, and you get Proto-Afro-Asiatic, which the "oldest" reconstructed language in the world, in other words the oldest language known to exist. Look into that language instead of saying "Arabic is the oldest language". Think about it, if every language comes from the same source, then it logically follows that EVERY language in the world is the oldest language. You guys haven't studied this and it really shows. Maybe read about it before taking some guy's personal fringe theory as truth. Islam never claims that Arabic is the original language of humanity btw. If you believe that every language came from the same source, then every language that exists today is some kind of dialect of that original language, including Arabic. This is no "neutral hate", this is Philology. Have any of you studied Philology?

@aq4356

Ай бұрын

@@Omroqurba there's mistakes in the video.

@aq4356

Ай бұрын

@@calleha01 good analysis on the proto world

Indonesian has a lot of loan words from Arabic. Even the names of the days of the week

@am3nnet

Ай бұрын

With the exception of Sunday, it used to be called ahad, but nowadays commonly called Minggu

@niggogado

Ай бұрын

​@@am3nnet ahad. minggu is also another name. both are applicable

@arizuanprinceleece

27 күн бұрын

yaa... bahasa indonesia/& Melayu banyak pinjaman daripada bahasa arab... Minggu pinjaman daripada bahasa Portugis - Domingo... mcm itu lah... 🫡🫡🫡

In Malay Arabic script we used to maintain some of the Arabic spelling ❤

@ariapinandita9240

Ай бұрын

Yups... Aksara Jawi... Modified Arabic script to write bahasa Melayu and several local languages in Indonesia...

First of all, it’s pretty obvious you have never studied linguistics. Indo-European languages, such as Greek, Sanskrit, Russian, English and even Bulgarian come from Proto-Indo-European, not Arabic because there has been done a lot of comperative linguistic research on the protolanguage. It is true, that languages can borrow terms and words from other languages, which was shown in your video. However, it seems that you have cherry picked examples for your video and did not go into semantic and pragmatic meaning of the words you discussed. Arabic comes from its own family, from which Hebrew, Coptic and other Semitic languages derive. What you did was basically to take words that ‘sound’ similar to Arabic and it is not a valid evidence for concluding that all languages come from Arabic. I would like to know about how Chinese, Greenlandic, languages of Africa, South American languages, languages of Oceania share, according to you, the common ancestor of Arabic. The same logic that you have used could be applied to make the claim that it is Hebrew, that is the protolanguage. So far, this video seems to me as poorly researched and heavily biassed.

Masha Allah. This discovery is outstanding. Jazak-Allah khair

@LyingOstrich

25 күн бұрын

It’s false. Arabic is not the origin of all languages.

YOU BLEW MY MIND YA AKHI!

May Allah reward you! ❤💚🤍🌹

@zaikaplates

Ай бұрын

Ameen

"thats just a theory, a language theory"

@darkprince6953

8 күн бұрын

bro trying to take mat pat's niche

Assalam alikum Jazak Allah khair for very interesting and informative video my friend👍🏻 thank you so much🤝

Thank you for this informative video. 😄

Brother may Allah bless you and reward you the highest levels of paradise for the effort you put in teaching the Arabic tongue, and I especially love how you teach Arabic through The Glorious Quran.

JazakAllahu khair 🤍

Subhan’Allah…..Great work …..your way of explaining is beautiful and inspiring ❤❤❤❤

This brother has taught us a lot of things about the Quran Recitation and Arabic language that we didn’t know so he is our teacher and we should respect him and if he has made any mistakes in this video or tried to teach us some “facts” about the “superiority” of Arabic language over other languages and made some mistakes then we should point them out with proof with due respect to him. Thanks.

@urielamauri7633

Ай бұрын

I agree; Arabic is a unique and fascinating language just because of the facts we know beforehand (the most conservative Semitic language and still preserved today). However, the Arabic language cannot be used as a source to Indo-European languages; just the way they work when creating words (a root word system vs an agglutinating word system) are very different.

@darkprince6953

8 күн бұрын

there no fact about a language superiority he made a very outlandish video he has a lot of baises and that very disrespectful to non arabs

سُبْحـانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْـدِهِ عَدَدَ خَلْـقِه، وَرِضـا نَفْسِـه، وَزِنَـةَ عَـرْشِـه، وَمِـدادَ كَلِمـاتِـه!🌟

May Allah bless your work Thank you brother for your work👍

everytime I watch a new video about arabic language makes me love it even more, and I used to love english more even so arabic is my mother language

I was watching a young autistic boy in the Muslim faith who was raised watching and reading the Quran.. now he is a master of the Quran he might still ? Display autistic tendencies...but he is an excellent teacher on the Quran. I could not help but be fascinated over the fact that if everyone in the world was given a Quran to learn in their own language as well as in Arabic we could all learn the same language based on our knowledge of the same words. On top of this the Arabic language or the Quran look like sheet music have specific tones and amounts of specific beats to be enunciated. What a beautiful learning experience school could be if you learn the Quran and then went to music and then went to science or art or anything else that you had to do how you would embace everything in the language of God. SUBHANALLAH

@thecoolnewsguy

Ай бұрын

Musical instruments are Haram by the way

@larsapher

Ай бұрын

@@thecoolnewsguy that would go for the voice also.. from what I've read it said that as long as the music is upright and righteous it is okay

@ibn_abdirrahman

Ай бұрын

​@larsapher , الس لا ام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركته. The hadith is clear in prohibition of musical instruments in general without any specification about truthfulness or piety of the music they are used for. Also the narrations from sahabah regarding the Quranic verse are clear. Also the speech of people of knowledge states the same fact, that musical instruments and music are prohobited. And some big scholars of madhahib even said that to say, that music is halal - is a disbelief. And Allah knows best. May allah bless you, my brother. Be aware of such sources that make it permissible to listen to any music. [There is only one exception for one specific musical instrument in one specific situation]

@larsapher

Ай бұрын

@ibn_abdirrahman what I did find was conflicting because it said that drums were considered okay tambourines were considered okay violin was considered okay if appropriate and pleasurable music as long as it was righteous and upright and not against the morals which much music in the west is negative and derogatory that is easy to see why it is around celebratory music I'm very vague .I will guess God will forgive us for dancing and enjoying music if we ask for it🙏🏿inshallah

Wallah qasam! Only Allah Almighty can rewards you with dissemination of our deen along the globe 🌎 Masha Allah Tabarakallah 🙌🤲🙏

This video seems to completely neglect the development of the English language. For example, look up the etymology of the word "tall" - late Middle English: probably from Old English getæl ‘swift, prompt’. Early senses also included ‘fine, handsome’ and ‘bold, strong, good at fighting’. It's very unscientific to take the modern definition of a word and compare it to classical Arabic whilst ignoring the history of the word and how it has evolved and the meaning has changed. The methodolgy is all over the place. You accept the modern meaning of "tall", but you go have to old German for "Harbour". And even this denies that the habour is traced back to two words harjaz, meaning army, and bergo, meaning protection. I can't find a reference for "hunan Berg" This is the definition of cherry picking. Not to mention that Classical Arabic itself has its own history, with other semitic languages like Hebrew and Akkadian having a far earlier attestation. Any meaningful analysis would have to take place at the level of the proto languages. Just because things are similar that doesn't mean they are related. Sorry to say, but this video flies in the face of literally everything we know about linguistics. Allah knows best.

@victoremman4639

Ай бұрын

Nop. You just show you believe the western etymologists whom invented the PIE. I made etymologic investigation, and many proves that linguists of the 19th century made speculations without root. One thing important to keep in mind : the words are borrowed, so we don't know when "Tall" came in english, it could be in the 14th century, when jews were expelled from Spain, and reached netherland and later on england. So my point here : the protosemitic langue is the source of the PIE. I wrote many articles for demonstrations, going deeper than this video. The word Earth is semitic : أرض. Try to deny :)

@Mehmet_Fateh

Ай бұрын

@@victoremman4639 The claim that a tiny immigrant population of Jews could have influenced the majority of farming peasants in Western Europe to start using the words "earth" or "tall", something that they would have used on a daily basis, is frankly, absurd, especially when you consider that the Sephardic Jews themselves didn't speak Hebrew as a daily language. But feel free to demonstrate, using textual evidence, the evolution of these words from Ladino into Dutch and or English. I'd be happy to read your article for a deeper conversation.

@victoremman4639

Ай бұрын

@@Mehmet_Fateh I show you again what is absurd in your reasoning : the Jews came from Spain, the country with more knowledge in these time, and knowing also the written, when your farming people were illettrated. I know the people like you, firm believers on feary tells PIE invented language, knowing so little about anthropology or nothing. Try to prove Earth is not semitic. Wait serious argument from you. You may see : my coms disappeared in yutub. Found ""The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif"", many demonstrations. I just had try to explain further Earth and its origin, so again : أرض compound by etyma Rdz = compression, so the Earth front the Skies. You have here an exegesis aswell. The prefixed Hamza means Causality, aswel First. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa. My hypothesis fit with history and geopgraphy, middel age in north west europa. Foolish to follow an invented PIE.

@victoremman4639

Ай бұрын

@@Mehmet_Fateh I add this : the word أرض carries the etyma RDz wich means Compression, so the Earth front the Skies. See, the semantic analysis joined Theology and exegesis, semitic one. The A prefixed to archaic root RDz means Causality, is an archetyp meaning aswell First : Ardz. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa . So my hypothesis fit with the historical datation of its use, geography too, middle age in north west europa, when jews spread within europa. Foolish to follow the track of the invented PIE.

@victoremman3089

Ай бұрын

@@Mehmet_Fateh Issue with yutb, again and again : @Mehmet_Fateh I show you again what is absurd in your reasoning : the Jews came from Spain, the country with more knowledge in these time, and knowing also the written, when your farming people were illettrated. I know the people like you, firm believers on feary tells PIE invented language, knowing so little about anthropology or nothing. Try to prove Earth is not semitic. Wait serious argument from you. You may see : my coms disappeared in yutub. Found ""The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif"", many demonstrations. I just had try to explain further Earth and its origin, so again : أرض compound by etyma Rdz = compression, so the Earth front the Skies. You have here an exegesis aswell. The prefixed Hamza means Causality, aswel First. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa. My hypothesis fit with history and geopgraphy, middel age in north west europa. Foolish to follow an invented PIE.

Jazak Allahu Khairun! 🇷🇴 ❤❤❤

16505 is about 75 percent of the allowable combinations of two and three letters if there are 28 to choose from and the first can't be doubled but the second can. 28×27×28+28×27=21924 Assuming Alif, ا, can't be one of the root letters, but hamsa can. I'm also assuming that waw, و, and yaa, ي, can be root letters. That means any non-Arabic word with two or three consonants has a high probability of having consonants sounding similar to Arabic just by coincidence. Some combinations may be difficult to pronounce and therefore avoided across different languages, increasing the probability. I'm not an Arabic speaker, so take what wrote about the number of possible roots with a grain of salt. I also read there are some 4 and 5 root letter words, but that those are rare.

I'm an asian learning arabic and this is true. I'm so impressed by how easy for me to learn Arabic since many of the word seems could be related to my own language.

"From the very beginning of Indo-European studies, there have been attempts to link the Indo-European languages genealogically to other languages and language families. However, these theories remain highly controversial, and most specialists in Indo-European linguistics are skeptical or agnostic about such proposals." Wikipedia

May Allah bless you my brother/brothers for the video

جزاك الله خيرا

I think this language sounds very beautiful because it has both powerful and soft tone it . 👍

Thank you bro ❤

European languages might have gotten the word for sugar from Arab traders, but the Arabs themselves got it from the old Persians and the Persians from the Indians ( शर्करा • (śárkarā) in Sanskrit)

It's a really interesting theory but it's very tough to prove, even while being hypothetical

Bro what? Arabic is like 3000 years old only, and modern Homo sapiens are like 250,000 years old.

@DinoBryce

29 күн бұрын

They don't believe in evolution

Great video.

Amazing video

Does anyone know what's the name of this app the brother uses for the illustration?

That's an interesting theory considering the fact just how similar the syntax of Semitic and Celtic languages is

Jazakallah khairan

can you please tell us the source for your claims about roots count?

@muhammadelmezayin3135

Ай бұрын

U didn't even watch the video man !

@darkprince6953

8 күн бұрын

​@@muhammadelmezayin3135he literally did

Asalaamu alaykum everyone

@save_sudan_and_palestine

Ай бұрын

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي الكريم

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

@FactsWithActs

Ай бұрын

وعليكم السلام

@Muslimcat980

Ай бұрын

Alaikuma saluma warahmatullAhi wa barakatu

@TinaHani-qh4lp

Ай бұрын

@@Muslimcat980 omg I love your cat 😭 I showed it to my brother and he laughed.. the hat & the sibha prayer beads ☺️🥹

Allahumma barik

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

Ameen

You should stick with Arabic lessons...

@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156

26 күн бұрын

With this, what can kind of ᶜArabic is he teaching?!???!

Thanks

Arabic has had a huge influence on the vocabulary of many languages around the world, but this video is highly misleading in promoting a pseudoscientific hypothesis on the origin of Indo-European languages that is not based in sound historical linguistic methodology. I encourage anyone watching to read up on the vast world of historical linguistics and the comparative methods that allow us to reconstruct the relationships between languages. Nationalist and religious movements have a long history of promoting their favored language as the origin of all others, but you are missing out on the fruits of an incredibly interesting field if you elevate these "theories" to the same level of centuries of critical, evidence-based investigation. The truth is so much more interesting, I promise.

Please explain the comparison between Arabic and Sanskrit and Tamil.

Is this based on research?

This is so true. Thanks for the excellent material. I wonder what would be the similarities with chineese, because I believe that Islamic civilization is the origin of western civilization, but is chineese civilization was really different and isolated

Do you have Arabic books for tajweed?

I love you and your content you helped me a lot Keep on❤️

@SavciSV

Ай бұрын

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh didn't understand, he lied in what??

@yorunohikari4369

Ай бұрын

​@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh If you're going to accuse him of lying, then give us a flip notes of the truth so we could search the rest.

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhhow did he lie????

@FactsWithActs

Ай бұрын

H​e didn't, that dude is just coping

@SavciSV

Ай бұрын

@@FactsWithActs copying from whom

Asalam o Alaikum brother, i wanted to ask you about Surah al Isra

Thanks.

My dear brother, i hold your tajweed, quran, and arabic grammer in the highest of esteem. If i doubt a certaon pronounciation in quran, i refer to you since it is clear to me that you have mastered this science beautifully and are very trustworthy and knowledgable in this matter. Having said that, it is a known fact that both anglo saxon and latin as well as french, russian, persian, pashto, hindi, bengali and thousands of others are indo european languages originating north of the black sea and central asia, whereas arabic, hebrew, somali, hausa, amazigh, and all these are afro asiatic, altogether unrelated to indo european, uralic, bantu, turkic, and other language families. Arabic is the most beautiful language in my opinion, since it is the language of the quran, and the prophes sallallahu alayhi wasallam and the three favored gereations radillah anhum, and no other can match its depth, eloquence, and beaty but that does not mean it is the oldest. Please, be either more thorough or truthfull, whichever is lacking in this video. Understand we value your content specifically because it is great quality, close detail, authentic, and you are knowledgable in this, so when you make these kinds of rediculous claims, it does not benefit either you nor us, so that disbelievers do not think of us as fools. Please kerp making the good videos you are used to making and we are used to seeing. Salam

Well, this is Exactly the Problem, the fact that there’s no such a scientific theory doesn’t negate the claim or the fact that Arabic is the source of All language, The Arabian peninsula mountains and valleys full with different Arabic Writings styles and script pre date any of its ‘sisters lang’, the fact that these findings not been examined and the claim or standard use by University’s or modern linguistics to determine an origin etc of a language is merely suspicion and conjecture , Not forgetting bias towards Arabic For known reason, And to determine this claim veracity not only on linguistic basis but Also archeology And anthropology, its scientific to claim Arabic is the source of All language and pre date any other language.

Barak Allahu feek

brother = baradar in farsi = bhrata in bengali borg = borgo meaning fort in bengali = qala3a in arabic = alcala in Spanish mead = mod in bengali bog (God) in Serbian = bhog-oban in bengali God = khoda in farsi tripoli = tri (three) + polli (villages) in bengali tyre = teer meaning shore in bengali que meaning what in spanish = qui in bengali kuru in japanese = koro in bengali shinto in japanese = shindhu in bengali meaning sindh = hindu

@urielamauri7633

Ай бұрын

Bengali is an Indo-European language, this is why we share a lot of common vocabulary.

@truthdisseminator

Ай бұрын

@@urielamauri7633 It's also undeniable there are thousands of Arabic words in Bengali, as well.

The proposition, however interesting, lacks foundation. Firstly, you should put the translations of each of the words into English next to them. You also forgot to include other Indo-European language families, such as the Balto-Slavic branch and Greek branch. I sincerely doubt you will find much similarity there. Thirdly, you should link each word to Arabic by showing us the whole chain, and at each step of the chain you should put a translation of the roots.

Another example I've noticed in French: "We" in Arabic: نحن (nahnoo) "We" in French: nous (noo)

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

Subhan Allah

@starlonga

Ай бұрын

Doesn't prove anything ... Use your brain ...

@user-fu9mk8vp3l

Ай бұрын

@@starlonga I'm pointing out something that I found interesting. Don't worry, my brain function very well, Al-Hamdullilah.

@starlonga

Ай бұрын

@@user-fu9mk8vp3l Okay Ma sha Allah

@phoenixk4328

Ай бұрын

​@@starlonga what a corny response

commenting to stay on islamic fyp

@hikmatussalafiyyah

Ай бұрын

follow me akhi

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

Ya Akhi, I am not saying you are, but Wallahi be carful of showing off your good deeds

@ibnmadiyar03

Ай бұрын

@@Krassertyp7 in short, i copied this comment a while ago and pinned in a place where you copy and paste 1) when i comment, the islamic content is promoted more and gets more reach 2) the more i comment under islamic videos, the more islamic videos I receive in my FYP I truly believe that you wrote the comment with good intentions and I appreciate it, may Allah reward you Just writing to make it clear that it's not a "show off" move to impress people, but just my contribution to the islamic world and for myself

This is true in Uganda specifically Luganda language we call sugar sukaali

Wildly inaccurate video with loads of mistakes. Very odd for this channel. European languages are indo-European and have practically no linguistic relation to Semitic languages like Arabic, beyond the existence of loan words. Also a language can have a significant percentage of words that are loan words from an unrelated language. Persian and Arabic are COMPLETELY different languages with different roots but Persian has a ton of Arabic loan words. “Tall” to choose *just one example* from this video comes from proto-Germanic Talez not an Arabic word. PS: if there was a connection between Arabic and Latin (and there isn’t) it would be the other way round as Greek and Roman culture had a huge influence on the northern Arabs . eg. The Nabatean architecture in Jordan and Saudi Arabia is based on Roman architecture but built by Arabs. Also before the arbs had their own alphabet they used other alphabets including the Greek alphabet. To suggest pre-Islamic Arabs influenced Latin makes no sense.

Love this explanation could this be because prophet Adam spoke Arabic?

Latin and Arabic belong to two completely different language groups; Indoeuropean and Semitic, respectively.

@ErenAlpErtem

Ай бұрын

you mean afroasiatic?

@anderslvolljohansen1556

Ай бұрын

@@ErenAlpErtem Yes. Semitic is a subgroup within the Afroasiatic language family. I found out after posting and wrote some comments about it.

@Satoshi-yd7lj

Ай бұрын

Proto Latin and proto Semetic shared the same root, as do all languages on their timelines. This theory is wrong, however. Islamic history even accounts for the development of Arabic from proto-Semetic by naming a man y3rob يعرب as the first to speak Arabic, descended from Qahtan who was the origin of the Arab ethnicity within Semetic peoples. Just as it accounted for how languages developed over time, Islamic history here also accounts for how ethnicities as social structures arise over time. The lineage of the prophet Muhammad for example is مستغرب meaning Arabized since the paternal lineage of the Quraysh is traced to Ismaiil, who was from the loins of Abraham and settled among the Arabs becoming Arabized. Arabic has certainly changed less over time because of the Quran and the cultural value of eloquence pre-Islam prepared the language as a medium for revalation. The ayah that he mentioned where Adam was taught all names, which then became the basis for all languages is most correct. Allahu 'Alam

@anderslvolljohansen1556

Ай бұрын

@@Satoshi-yd7lj Latin is Indoeuropean. The common origin of the Indoeuropean goes back around 6000 years (+-). Arabic probably didn't exist back then. Semitic is a sub-group within the Afroasiatic languages.

@anderslvolljohansen1556

Ай бұрын

@@Satoshi-yd7lj Languages change so fast that shared origins of major families beyond several thousand years is difficult or impossible to determine from similarities, because some similarities could be entirely coincidental.

Brother, please make video of Sana manuscript problem.

Pseudo science, Hindus say Sanskrit is the origin of languages too. Both theories are not good

@niccolopaganini1782

28 күн бұрын

Thank God, someone understands.

@user-mz1gi7hq8h

27 күн бұрын

أنت تتكلم بالعاطفة فقط ، و الحقائق العلمية و التاريخية ، لا تثبت بالعواطف ، بل تثبت بالبحث العلمي ، و بالدراسة في الكتب المتخصصة ، و بالأدلة العلمية.

@darkprince6953

8 күн бұрын

​@@user-mz1gi7hq8hthe one speaking emotionally is the hosd of this video

akhi sorry, but with this video you have made too many wrong implications that were baseless, for example when you said harbour came from arabic huna burj, or tall from arabic tal. If you look at their actual etymologies they are completely unrelated and come from complete distinct roots. I do not want to conter the fact that arabic is the best and chosen language, but you do not help showing it by using such inaccuracies

@africankidd3642

Ай бұрын

But you do know that most languages have atleast a little Arabic influence you know. For example in English: Algebra or Alcohol or in many Indonesian languages: Musibat. Spanish: Camisa and the article “El” etc

@manssurmedia

Ай бұрын

@@africankidd3642 Of course I know that there are words that came from arabic to other languages, the same as words from other languages came into other languages and arabic as well, but that’s not what he talked about. He theorized about arabic being somehow the root for all languages and used completely wrong assumptions and implications.

@viperapps2114

Ай бұрын

I checked harbour and it's exactly as he explained no need to comment without actual knowledge

@_Cura

Ай бұрын

Akhi sorry, but with this comment you have made too many wrong implications that were baseless. For example, you say that our dear brother made: “TOO many bad implications” when you only cite 2 of these bad implications, out of the more than 60 examples of words cited in the video. Furthermore, you say that the words Harbor and Tall do not come from the words Hunan Burj and Tal, and that in reality these words have completely different roots, you don't even mention which roots are different and don't even mention where did this information come from, what are your sources, what book did you get this information from? Finally, you seem to ignore all the arguments used in this video to justify these reflections (such as the historical facts with the Turkish texts which have changed over time, passing to the origin of Arabic, or the origin of word harbour with the invasions of the United Kingdom by the Vikings, which supported the fact that harbour came from hunan burj, or the fact that Arabic has more than 16,000 roots while other languages ​​have 20 at 8 times less, or the interpretation of certain verses of the Qur'An or the names of Adam, his wives and his children which have letters exclusive to the Arabic language and so on etc...) While you don't cite any arguments.

@_Cura

Ай бұрын

​@@viperapps2114 Fact

Assalamu Alaikum brother, I saw your silent recitation video, but in the mosque where I pray, the fans are running so fast that I can't even hear my recitation, what should I do?

@yarnmisery

12 күн бұрын

what happened to asking politely

Very cool

Here in kenya we say sukari and am somalian in our language we say sukor!

The language taught to Adam (A.S) was the original language and the main source of all languages, Arabic is the Direct descendant of the said language.

@calleha01

Ай бұрын

I mean technically all languages would be direct descendants according to this hypothesis.

Fantastic video about the Arabic tongue perhaps being the original tongue of all languages. I'd like to add that not only Anglo-Saxon and Latin languages share roots with the Arabic tongue, I also noticed that Asian languages do too, for example, the Japanese language shares striking words with Arabic, like the word (sama) in Arabic, which means (sky, or something exalted or high) is the same word with a similar meaning in the Japanese language. Another example, the word (anta) in Arabic, which means (you) is the same in Japanese and has the same meaning, also, the word (yadd) in Arabic, which means (hand) is similar in pronunciation to the Japanese word (ude) which means (arm). I'm not a linguist but I have interest in the Arabic tongue and its relation to The Glorious Quran and other languages old and new, and I find it fascinating how numerous are the examples that point to The Arabic tongue being most likely the original tongue!

@SomeofThisSomeofThat

Ай бұрын

Factually your statement is illogical … there are literally languages and peoples more ancient than Arabic. Akkadian, Sumerian, Egyptian…and those three are only the languages with WRITTEN records. What we do know is that the first languages were spoken not written, so there are languages that are more ancient than the languages that are known to pre-date Arabic.

@Abu7asan27

Ай бұрын

My statement is not illogical because I did not say the Arabic tongue is for a fact the original tongue of all languages, rather I said it perhaps and most likely is, and I'd given examples that support what I'm saying even with hard to relate with languages, like Japanese! In addition, what you've stated doesn't prove anything, because -and I'm sure you know this- at any moment, archeological discoveries can prove that Arabic is in fact older than all the languages you've mentioned, also, as for now, it is a fact that the Arabic tongue is way richer than all the languages you've mentioned, thus the fact that such archeological samples exist does not prove that those languages were older than Arabic or that Arabic did not exist before them. I don't know if you're a Muslim or not, but as a Muslim myself, and with the concrete evidence that The Glorious Quran is factual and truthful, I am standing on solid ground when it comes to discussing such a topic, an even more solid ground than any academic studies and research. With good intentions, I invite you to study The Glorious Quran and the Arabic tongue, then I'm positive you'll notice the numerous observations that make the Arabic tongue a superior candidate for an original tongue, because at the end of the day, there has to be an original tongue that all languages came from either directly or indirectly.​@@SomeofThisSomeofThat

@SomeofThisSomeofThat

Ай бұрын

@@Abu7asan27 Again, your curiosity to consider whether Arabic is the oldest language is unfounded and quite literally makes no sense. Ill never understand why the world around white-washes or brown-washes human history when time after time after time all evidence points towards Sub-Saharan Africans being the first peoples. Maybe you should look to the original people and explore their languages. Then maybe you’ll find the original language…but you certainly wont find the answer from somebody whose bias is to prove Arabic as the “original” language. Arabic is an Afro-Semetic language particularly from the Semetic branch which is pre-dated by the Afro branch. The Afro branch found in the Horn of Africa is pre-dated by African languages the further south in Africa you travel. Khoisan languages with the clicks consonants are estimated to be 60,000 years old.

I'm from Pakistan and I speak urdu which mixture of Arabic, Persian and Turkish languages.

great

👌 Well, no one knows the reality of such topics but it was somehow a convincing theory, thanks for bringing it up. I'm not an arab, after learning 7 languages besides my mother language, and still keep learning more, I also saw similarities & differences between languages, maybe someday a genius/some geniuses will find factually the origins of languages with considerable proof. I don't think it matter much but knowing it, will help us understand the humanity's journey from the linguistic dimension of life on 🌎.

Very informative MashaAllah. The word "earth" and the arabic word "ard" is also so much alike.. It can olnly be that arabic is the oldest language and the origin of all languages.. It is very very odd and at the same time we muslims get why no one is really talking about this.. It is too obviois that this information can be a door for people to want to investigate this language, and further more the book of Allah SWT and discover that Islam is the true religion that Allah SWT chose for mankind.. SubhanAllah wa ALhamdulillah...

Where are you from, akhy al kareem?

Please make video on inheritance law in Quran

😂 Trying to تعريب every thing in the world is a huge problem ...!! This video full of misinformation and ignorance . 1: sugar is derived from sanskrit not arabic 2: those similarities don't necessarily mean that those words have common source, it means languages have limited sounds and letters to represent words. 3: english (+ most indo-european languages) are not root based languages as arabic and Semitic languages; so, your comparison here is misrepresentation (and root system doesn't mean richness, it's just how a certain language function). 4: camel has more 50 words doesn't mean arabic is rich, is just mean camel is existed and raised in the arabian peninsula ,, for example, you can see the opposite with an animal like pig; hundreds of names in english regarding pig and just one word (خنزير) in arabic. 5: first people who ever exist (حواء، آدم، قابيل، هابيل) these names have their roots in Hebrew not arabic and they neither sound arabic nor have unique arabic sounds originally, they just got arabicized as countless of other Hebrew names (إسماعيل، إسحاق، إبراهيم) and so on. Arabic is just a language like any other language !

@blackrock_cock

Ай бұрын

You are wrong about one thing: pigs also have more than one name خنزير خَنْزُوَان النَاخِر خِنزِيرَة خِنَّوْص - دوبل

@darkprince6953

8 күн бұрын

finally someone with braincells

This is blowing my mind away honestly.... shocking

@hikmatussalafiyyah

Ай бұрын

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh Yo're wasting time pulling hairs out for a KZread video, he's getting his bag and you're not lol

@wb1847

Ай бұрын

I'm well aware of proto indian European, the possible reconstructions and proto semitic, and also the modern theory on these. But there's important and relevant claims, examples here. They need to be investigated and can't be accepted as is, but can't be dismissed either with research. For example, the claim on a large portion of the roots of Latin somehow matching those of Arabic needs a reference + more looking into

@wb1847

Ай бұрын

Just a note, Indo-Semitic is a real consideration though not mainstream.

@Krassertyp7

Ай бұрын

Really

@starlonga

Ай бұрын

Because it is not true, it’s armchair research, it’s made up, NO ONE believes this. A random guy made it up. Look up the etymologies of the words presented in this video, and see for yourself. This video is shockingly shallow.

I was listening to a Muslim teacher give the definitions of the first three words in the prayer Bismillah Al raham Al Raheem. Roughly translated to English is there is only one God .God is the most merciful entirely merciful.. what bismillah means in the beginning, rakman translate to the root word of the womb and El Rahim broken down to in the afterlife therefore the translation is closer to there is only one God he was there in the beginning at the womb, and he will be there in the end in the afterlife .this is why we should live in fear of Allah because he will be judging us if we want to go to Jannah we will be good extra good..what # hedith in the Quran so can I study it