A tip for installing the 82mm inlaid ring... clip it to the Revolution lens cap first, then hand screw it onto your lens; it will screw in without cross threading (plastic tool can then be used to snug as needed). I have a 16-35 lens and it makes a huge difference compared to the standard ring - at 16mm using the inlaid ring and any single filter there is barely any vignetting. Give it a try and see if it works for you. And, thanks for the great video; always thorough and very educational!

the Kase 112mm wolverine kit is wonderful. I got mine a year or so ago after your recommendation and never looked back. I used this in the Galapagos to great affect last year on the z70-200mm f2.8 using the UV and polariser primarily. AWESOME. Thanks Hudson

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for sharing!

Nice to hear that the 112mm filters are more compatible in their fitting between the two series. 😎👍🏾🙏🏾

Thank you Hudson! ordered 49-82mm step ring for my Wolverine 82mm filters to use on Q2...

Thanks for this - I have the 82mm Wolverine kit, since my biggest thread was 82mm (14-30 f/4) - I realised the recommendation was 95mm to avoid vignetting when stacking, but stacking is rare for me and this was an extra £100! 112mm would be financially prohibitive, but I know one day, when I eventually get the 14-24, I will find this a painful need...

Incredible insight. Really considering the kit. But quite expensive for the 112mm. However, like you said, it covers all cases!

Thanks for the lighting fast shipping, I also need the 72-112 step up

@HudsonHenryPhoto

9 ай бұрын

We've got those too. :) thanks for the feedback!

I'm totally with you on the use of UV filters.

@robgerety

Жыл бұрын

My thinking now is that it makes practical sense to put a screw on UV on most of my lenses for protection and leave it there most of the time - maybe take it off for the moment when I am taking a shot or when I am sticking on an ND type filter. So, just a good quality glass plain screw in UV filter with screw threads on both sides that will hold my standard pinch type plastic cap is where I think I am ending up. I'll use my 82mm Kase set on all my lenses which are 82 and under and I already own them. I will likely sell my 77mm Kase filters. Should have listened to you from the get go. Frankly, I wish I went with 95 or bigger from the get go.

Hi can you please do a small section on the new Nikon hoods somehow find them very difficult to put on and off

I bought your 112mm set and they work great. Even bought an extra HB97 hood. Not sure I would change just for the color coding but nice idea. By the way, what are three color rings for on your tripod? Ever thought of an Alaskan workshop? Thanks as always.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

We will get to Alaska. I've spent a lot time from ANWR to Wrangel and the Alaska Range. I use that colored gaff tape to mark my tripods from all the other identical ones in my sprinter on workshops. Everyone loves them and once someone tries one out they bring one on their second or third workshop. :-)

In the first couple minute you mention that kit lacking a Night Sky and UV option. I'm sure you already know about the Maven Magnetic filters. They have those filters as well a larger variety of filter sizes.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

I prefer the color rendition from Kase. The Revolution line is brand new and just fleshing out. The only thing missing for me is a 112 night and it's coming. For now the older wolverine line works fine and it's the exact same glass. The 112s are fully interchangeable.

@robgerety

Жыл бұрын

I think I saw the Kase does have the night filter in the Revolution line. Could be wrong?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

I've got them right here: shop.hudsonhenry.com/collections/filters

Thanks for introducing these fantastic accessories I have ordered a lens cap for my 800mm, can't wait for it to come. A chance of you lobbying Nikon to update their software so the Pro Capture works with Raw files instead of JPEG ?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

Malcolm. I dream of them listening to me... :-)

Damn wish canon had a universal hood like that!

I go with Kase over other filters because the adapter rings actually freaking hold Nikon lens caps snuggly. No other filter set does this (even Maven), the lens caps easily fall off the adapter rings. In addition, the magnetic lens caps are flat for EVERY brand and can’t be pinched to remove off, this is really annoying when you have a magnetic lens cap on a lens with a longer hood. I don’t know why more people don’t complain about this but they don’t. So, I find Kase superior because I can use the magnetic lens cap OR my original lens cap and it fits perfectly on the adapter ring. This is HUGE for using your camera day by day while keeping the adapters on all your lenses at all times. I have no idea if this is something Kase filters do my a happy coincidence, or if they designed it this way, but they’re the only ones I know that allow you to attach a traditional lens cap over the filters and filter rings.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

They sometimes listen to people like you and me when we give feedback, not always, but sometimes.. :-)

I have the Z24-70mm f/2.8, Z14-24mm f/2.8 and Z50 f/1.2mm and I bought two extra Kase Wolverine threaded adapters, two extra Kase 112mm lens caps, two extra HB97 lens hoods so all three lenses are outfitted with the same system without having to hot swap...of course the Z85mm f/1.2 doesn't comply so an 82-112mm adapter is in order.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

Yeah I was bummed to find that with the 85, but It's been amazing in Havana this week anyway. Dream portrait lens. ;-)

What do you think of the Kase circular polarizer CPL when compared to NISI CPL ?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

I tried the NiSi first. They sent me a set of 112s to check out when the Nikon 14-24 launched. Thier glass is great. I think the Kase is more durable and many times simpler to use. The magnetic system just slays any standard threaded system. You'll never go back. Kase's revolution and wolverine system are my preference after testing just about everyone's offerings. I left my Hoya ambassadorship to work with Kase after testing them.

As always, a PHENOMENAL coverage of a photo topic. I have two questions: 1. Unless I missed it, there was one thing I did not hear in this video, "Why do the Revolution filters exist?". Said another way, "What is Kase hoping to achieve with this new filter line that improves on the Wolverine line?". 2. The one thing that keeps me from tossing my bespoke lens-size specific threaded filters in exchange for a single large universal-size magnetic filter as you suggest is the inability to use them with the camera manufacturer's lens hood. I typically keep my lens hood on all the time and do not use lens caps at all (the lens cap stay in the lens's original box until I eventually sell the lens). This is space inefficient in my backpack, as the hooded-lenses take up more space, but is super efficient when changing lenses, especially as all my lenses are primes and I am constantly changing them. One thing that keeps me from using a lot of filters in general is the need to remove the hood and screw the adapter ring or the filter itself to the front of the lens each time I want to use them. I can't leave the adapter ring on the lens, as the hood won't fit. In fact, sometimes a filter's knurled ring is too big for the hood, even for filters that are the correct size for the lens (big polarizers, for example). One thing I learned from this video is there a super low-profile magnetic ring adapter that fits inside the screw threads of the lens. I know you don't like the super low-profile magnetic ring adapter, but it sounds great to me. My idea would be to purchase one super low-profile magnetic ring adapter for each of my lenses and keep them in place all the time as they would not interfere with the hood. It would then be a simple matter to remove the hood when filters are needed and attach a single large universal-size the magnetic filter as you suggest, but only IF there are magnetic lens-size adapter rings. So that's my second question, are there magnetic filter-size adapter rings that are magnetic on both ends (lens side AND filter side), or are the adapter rings magnetic on only the filter side (ie, still need to be screwed into the lens)? In the case the adapter rings still need to be screwed into the front of the lens, I fail to see the value in magnetic filters, as the whole cross-threading thing is still an issue. Thank you in advance for your help in this matter.

@ronawood

Жыл бұрын

I've got the same question about the super low-profile ring. It seems to make sense on the 14-24 F2.8 lens with the 112mm filter sizes because that doesn't require a step up ring. On the 14-30 F4 lens, a 82mm inner ring would also make sense. Other than that you would just screw in a magnetic step up ring when you wanted to use filters. My guess is that the inner ring is only for super wide angle lenses where vignetting would be an issue. The regular step up rings would be sufficient for all other focal lengths. Of course that doesn't help with being able to use the native lens hood. The option I guess is to just use the normal stepup ring and just remove it when your not using the filters.

@robgerety

Жыл бұрын

I find it very fiddly to use a lens hood when I am setting up a shot with various ND filters etc. Its off and on over and over. PIA. I am probably just going to leave my lens hoods in the lens boxes.

I am looking to purchase the 112mm filters for the 12-24/2.8 (I also have the 70-200/2.8 and 24-120/4). I was leaning towards the Revolution series since that is the way the company is heading. I also want the neutral night filter and can purchase that separately. Alternatively I could buy the more expensive kit but that is not a Revolution series. Would really like your input. Thanks!

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

If you have time, I'm pushing them hard to get the night filter added to Revolution and get me kits with them included. I'm not sure how long it will take. Till then all the 112s are fully interchangeable, so you could buy the smaller kit and add it. I wish I had more options, but they don't yet exist.... Remember if you get 3 Kase items in my store you do get a discount applied automatically, so with an adapter ring you'd be there.

Hi this was an interesting video I have the Wolverine filters I am only just learning how to use them. Would you be able to tell me if I needed to use the CPL, ND, & GRAD filter can they be used together if so what order please. 😀 I am new to these so just not sure 😀

@HudsonHenryPhoto

9 ай бұрын

I'd advocate never using the grad filter at all. Bracket and combine exposures instead without adding an unnatural contrast line through the center of your images. Search my channel for "high constrast" for more on that. Grads do far more harm than good. You can add ND atop a cpl whenever you want the polarizing effect (to add contrast or control reelections), but be careful with ultrawide angles not to differently polarize the sky.

@angelathomas2117

9 ай бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhotoThank you I only was going to use the GRAD filter since I am not so good at photoshop

@HudsonHenryPhoto

9 ай бұрын

Watch this: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fpap2I-EgtOberA.html It's a few clicks in lightroom to create a file with all the bracketed images' combined dynamic range. Simple

Hey Hudson. What are your thoughts on the Kase clip in filters over the revolution filters?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

3 ай бұрын

REVOLUTION all the way. The clip ins are a huge pain in the ass. HUGE. Once you try the Revolutions you will never go back to another system. I tried the internal clip in's way back when the Z6 / Z7 launched thinking they might be cool. I used them a couple times. I think they're still in a box somwhere in the studio. :-)

I tried the 77 mm inlaid ring on my 17-40 Canon L, The Kase filters sit right without putting the inlaid ring on the lens. once I put the inlaid filter on the lens, I use the Kase CPL to make sure the ring sits right, the Kase filters do not sit flat. I tried this 3 times now with the same results. Has anyone run into this problem?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

Again, the first thing I did with the inlaid ring was round file it. It's fabulous in 112mm for the Nikon HB-97 hood. Put it in and the hood is a magnetic holder. For lenses with the smaller sizes, I can't advise you to use them. Use the standard threaded external magnetic ring. It's fabulous. I don't agree with stacking UV and specialty filters. Take the UV off before mounting a CPL or ND. Using the inlaid only reduces the magnetism and risks damaging the lens. Added to the lack of need is the single filter thread somehow incorporated into the new Kase Revolution filters. They're still as thin, but now you can use a pinch cap on them. :-) Love it.

Do you have thoughts on the 100mm Kase Armour system and Grad ND usage?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

8 ай бұрын

Yes. It's the best of the systems available for people who continue to insist on using graduated filters. I see no reason on earth to put an artificial contrast line through the middle of an image, darkening trees and mountains rising above the contrast line and leaving highlights overexposed below the contrast line. Why do that when we modern photograpghers can so easily bracket 3 frames, 3 stops apart and blend them into a single linear raw file with all that rich exposure lattitude to raw process framewide? I used graduated filters all the time 20 years ago. A dozen years ago on Art Wolfe's advice, I started bracketing and blending shadow detail in using a soft brush on photoshop layers. Now I bracket 3stops apart and click merge to HDR in lightroom. BAM framewide boost of 6 stop exposure lattitude before I start processing the raw shadows and highlights. It even works handheld. When I see graduated filters in the field I shake my head these days...

Did you happen to test for vignetting on the 14-30 or 24-70 when using the 82mm inlaid adapter?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

Again. I would never use the 82mm inlaid adapter on one of my lenses. The inlaid 112 is great in the HB-97 hood. I found the new 82 inlaid suitable for round filing. I no longer use either of those lenses, but I never had an issue with the 24-70 F4 vignetting with the wolverines and the standard threaded adapter before I traded it in on the 24-120. For the 2.8, the HB97 with 112s is magic just like it is on all the 2.8 zoom S lenses. Hope that helps.

@tooki3698

Жыл бұрын

@Hudson Henry Photography Sorry, I wasn't explicit. I'm actually a Sony shooter, so the 112 kit isn't really an option for me. I'm more just trying to get an idea if the inlaid ring will solve vignetting on wide zooms (e.g. the 24-70 GM II, 16-35 GM) because I tried the 82mm wolverine filters (non-revolution version) and found the vignetting unacceptable. I could go up to 95mm, but I'd much prefer to avoid that extra bulk and expense--especially if I'm putting adapter on my smaller primes. A small prime adapted to 82 mm isn't that much larger than a prime without the adapter, but a small prime with a 95mm adapter will no longer fit nicely in my Pelican case, and is prone to getting caught on the bottom of dividers in my bag.

The biggest lens I have is an 82mm. So, Im thinking of going to a 95mm. One thing I wish they had was a step-up adapter built in with the magnetic adapter. Sucks that for my 70-100mm (77mm) and 24-70mm (82mm) lenses, I need an adapter to go to 95mm and then add the magnetic adapter on top. Would be better if it was an all in one system. Also, if I get a 16mm, wondering if these 95mm's will be good when double stacked. Would you recommend the Clear UV filter to be threaded on and never removed, then a step-up ring and the magnetic adapter. Or perhaps a magnetic Uv filter that's removable?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Ай бұрын

I think that in practice you'd find that super annoying. I LOVE the fact that the revolution design has just enough edge to trap a pinch cap so that I don't have to use magnetic caps. Why? It's very hard to pull the cap without taking the filter off too. The same would be true of magnetic adapter rings. You'll find the rings spin on in 2 seconds every time. Keep them in an easy to access pocket in the bag and spin them on as you pull the lens out. It's like taking off the cap. NO, ABSOLUTELY NOT. Consider a threaded UV like a protective 2nd lens cap to catch dust and grime. Pull it before shooting your best images, esepciallin backlight. If you're adding another fitler, it's useless and can only serve to degrade image quality. Yep, you'll be fine with stacking with a 16mm. It's fine stacking the 95s in front of Nikon's 14-30. :-)

@michaelfrymus

Ай бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto I don't want to use magnetic lens caps. But it would be nice if the step up rings were also magnetic, allowing for both. So, if I'm correct, I'll have to get a step up ring with a magnetic inlet ring. But, I'm still debating on the size. My 24-70mm is an 82mm diameter. I would prefer not to go to a 95mm if I don't need to. But, worried it may vignette. I don't have a 16-35mm yet, so I can test vignetting - but I think it's a 72mm diameter

One thing I ask when the discussion about using UV filters comes up is if I show you a picture can you tell if it was taken with or without a UV filter?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

Not a good one like Kase's MC-UV or the Hoya HD3s I used to use.

Does using filters make the lens coatings insignificant since the filter would need to be cloated to prevent glare?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

No. You want the filters you use in high-contrast, backlight (only ND for me) to be coated sure, but my advice is to pull any protectivr uv or polarizing filter before shooting into high contrast backlight (say a sunstar or sunset with the disc rimming) to leave only your perfectly clean coated front element and avoid little ghosts from dust and lack of uv filter coatings. The best uv and cpl filters like the Kase wolverine/revolution line in my store and Hoya's HD3s are so well made and coated that they do not cause any ghosting themselves, but they will get dust and schmutz on them that cause it. Think of them as way to keep your actual front element clean and ready for high-contrast, backlit scenes.

If the Revolution are smaller, would it be possible to stack filters on the 14-24 without vignetting at 14mm?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

The 112s are identical. Only the smaller filters (ie 82s) are ever so slightly smaller. The 112s for the 14-24 are fully interchangeable with wolverines as I show in this video and I've stacked three on that lens with zero vignetting. :) www.hudsonhenry.com/kase

I would appreciate some advice I will be spending a month in Nepal In November to early December I have a Z9 and the my 3 go to lens 14-24 24-70 70-200 all coming with me my filters are lee which i have updated over the years but weight on this trip is going to be a big issue and looking at changing to the Kase 112mm set but i do like my graduated filters can you assist with what would work best we will be hiking for 3 weeks over the 3 passes and EBC 160 Kms and over 5500 meters in height.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

11 ай бұрын

Sounds like a great trip. Wish I was coming. Here's my honest take. If I can do anything to convince you to abandon your graduated filters, please consider it. I did about 10 years ago and never looked back. Graduated filters in this day and age do far more harm than good. A simple bracketed set of 3 images 3 stops apart will allow you to capture all the tonal contrast of using a 6 stop neutral density filter through every single bit of your image. No more artificial contast line with half of a tree dark and half of the tree light. Forget stopping down incorrectly and carefully placing the filter. Simply turn on bracketing and shoot. Check out this video to see what I mean: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fpap2I-EgtOberA.html

Excellent information - do you use the night filter much? I do quite a bit of night photography and actually never considered it before

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

Yes and it is fabulous. I had them make special wolverine kits for me with the night filter included I love it so much. I have them over at my store as well as the night filters separate. It adds contrast to the night sky and filters out significant amounts of light pollution. www.hudsonhenry.com/kase

@stevenkornfeld6804

Жыл бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto thanks and keep the podcasts coming. Hope to do a workshop with you someday

@Nickporter17

Жыл бұрын

​@@stevenkornfeld6804 which tripod is that?

@stevenkornfeld6804

Жыл бұрын

@@Nickporter17 if you're asking me it's a gitzo 2542 with a RRS bh-30 head

@Nickporter17

Жыл бұрын

@@stevenkornfeld6804 I'll check it out on your website

Can you screw the inlaid magnetic ring into the Kase R-MCUV-Filter? This would keep the UV filter on securely while removing any other magetic stuff, even the magnetic lens cap.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

3 ай бұрын

You could sure, but I would never, ever stack a filter over UV. UV is a front element protector and dust catcher. When I have a shot that really matters, I pull it off to have the perfectly clean element beneath. If I'm using a creative filter like a cpl or ND. I pull the UV before mounting every time. The front element is now safe behind the creative filter. With the magnetic system doing this is a breeze. I just mount a magnetic ring or magnetic adapter ring on whatever lens I'm using and snap the uv or other magnetic filter in place when it leaves the bag. Simplicity itself.

@DominikW

3 ай бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhotoYou are absolutely right about stacking on top of UV, of course. I was thinking about the magnetic lens cap. I fear that removing the magnetic lens cap while using Kase's magnetic UV filter will pop off the UV filter as well. Or will this hold on enough that I can remove the lens cap indivudally without much fiddling?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

3 ай бұрын

The new revolution filters have a single filter thread in thier thin case that coincidentally allows the use of pinch caps which I vastly prefer for exactly that reason.

I think using the inlaid ring will work fine if left installed on a step up ring, none of the fear of wrecking glass or lens threads.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

8 ай бұрын

Certainly an option in a step up, but a pain to remove is you need to adapt the step up further. The magnetic step ups are amazing and much simpler.

Does the light leak on the HB-97 bother you at all? Would you change to the Nisi replacement to clear that up?

@gosman949

Жыл бұрын

what is the HB-97?

@zZola_Photography

Жыл бұрын

@@gosman949 thats the threaded hood that comes with the 14-24/2.8 which takes the filters

@Jedduh

Жыл бұрын

I bought the nisi HB-97 replacement and it works with the Kase filters

@gosman949

Жыл бұрын

@@zZola_Photography does Kase have a solution for the leak too?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

There isn't any leak in that hood. Not that I've been able to discern in 100s and 100s of long exposure images in bright daylight even using 16stops of ND for noontime 120s exposures. I really think the complaint is bunk

Is it possible to use the circular or rectangular graduated ND filters with the 112mm system?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

If there is any way I can urge you to try bracketing instead... I specifically had sets of filters created by Kase excluding graduated filters since I believe they do far more harm to modern imagery than good. A well captured set of 3 images 3 stops apart. -3, on the meter, and plus 3 will give you all the tonal range you need. The camera can capture 14-15 stops these days. That technique gives you 20-21 stops of exposure latitude frame wide with a simple click in your editing suite of choice. Now you can recover shadows and highlight detail frame-wide without a darkened line across half your frame. :-) Here's a video I did a while back proving the point: kzread.info/dash/bejne/fpap2I-EgtOberA.html I stopped using graduated filters except very rarely for timelapse or video over a dozen years ago and I lived by them in the film age. I had the full Galen Rowell Singh Ray set. I've been given Kase's Armour system to test and their K9. In both cases, I liked the K9 for square filter aficionados. Light and simple, but I had them create me a kit without any graduated filters in it. ;-) www.hudsonhenry.com/kase

@ronawood

Жыл бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto Thanks for the reply. You don't have to sell me hard on not using graduated filters. I'm really trying to just keep it simple and I'm thinking about just starting with a CPL and ND filters. I was just wanting to see if in the future, I found a need for a GND filter, I would have the ability to use one with the base setup I go with. I'm trying to decide between the 82 and 112 Revolution sets. I don't have a need for the 112 filters yet, but think I may buy the 14-24 F2.8 in the future. However, if I went with the 14-30 F4, I could just stay with 82mm filters.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

That's sort of true. I found the 14-30 vignetted with any 82mm filter up to about 18 or 20mm. It does accept the hb97 112mm filter hood along with all three 2.8 S zoom lenses and the 50 1.2. I can also get custom ordered 95mm filters with one extra day lead time in my store. Www.hudsonhenry.com/kase the Kase distributor conveniently lives across town. :) If you were to use grads later, Kase makes them, but a 100mm square system is really much much better for that (like the k9 system in my store). I've never found round grads good for much, even back in the days when I used grads.

@ronawood

Жыл бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto Can you get the Kase KW Revolution Mega Set (82mm)?

I just discovered I can install the 82mm inlaid ring into my Nikkor 14-24 2.8S. You just press it it into the built-in petal mini hood. It has some circumferential kind of threads (not really threads). The ring sits about 1 mm inside the mini hood. When it is there, there is no vignetting. I use a Kase cap. When you add ONE filter, there is a small vignetting that disappears at 16mm. If you add two filters (an ND and a CPL), there is vignetting up to 18 mm. Seems to me that it can be handled in post. So that you guys know. For some trips it would allow me to travel without 112mm filters.

@HudsonHenryPhoto

6 ай бұрын

The 112 system in the hb97 hood is simplicity itself. Add that the simple hood snap clicks onto the 24-70 2.8 S, 70-200 S, 14-30 S & 50 1.2 S, and I really see no reason to jam a piece of metal up next to that special front element of the 14-24 S in order to use filters that vignette. I would urge people fortunate enough to own the 14-24S to use the 112 system as intended. I personally advocate tossing the smaller inlaid rings from Kase. I certainly won't use them.

@luisdiegosalas

6 ай бұрын

Yes, I agree,@@HudsonHenryPhoto . I just did a bit more testing and that vignetting is awful. I am about to remove that ring and invest in the 112mm filter set (soon).

hi Hudson,i have since two years the 112mm magnetic kase for nikon z 14-24mm but to my surprise my filter has a different code printed on it,it says BJ23 instead of AK23 and i cannot find any information about it,do you know anything about it,all info appreciated..🤭to be honest i am using it more intensively last month and i see really little effect when rotating the filter,i always use polarizers on other camera's mostly sony a7rIV with hoya and B&W and these filters have much more impact,am i missing something?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

11 ай бұрын

I really don't know. I think they change the numbering in different production runs.

@spaski3

11 ай бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto i checked with Kase and it turns out having to do with a certain period of giving the batch a code..thanks for your response..so production runs indeed..🤗i forgot to mention it was about a CPL filter but i have to say i am a bit dissapointed with the effect..with hoya hdx and b&W polarizers i definetely see the effect when rotating the filter but with the kase..nothing..that's also why i contacted kase customer service but they don't respond to that fact..sorry if my english is a bit sloppy but i am dutch..

@HudsonHenryPhoto

11 ай бұрын

I find the polarizing effect at least as effective as the Hoya hd3 filters I used as an ambassador for them for nearly a decade before kase developed what I consider this better product. Your using a wolverine or revolution filter? Ultra wides do show less effect throughout the frame as the polarizing only affects the portion of the sky at 90 degree angle to the sun (ie north and south, not east or west). I think you'll find with practice that the Kase has a more neutral color balance, but just as strong an effect as any other top brand. Before chosing to switch to Kase I compared the Wolverines to Hoya, NiSi, Breakthrough and B&W. NiSi and Kase were the best of the bunch and Kase's simplicity of use broke the tie easily. :)

@spaski3

11 ай бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto hi Hudson again thank you for your time and response,i use polarizers for as long as i take photographs because my first subject was always skies..and ofcourse i know how to use them,it is the wolverine version..i will make a final thorough attempt to see if i can use it more optimal..

@spaski3

11 ай бұрын

polarizing effect is much more subtle than with the hoya HDX..so was probably a little prejudgemental because Hoya effect much more obvious..

I scratched the front of my sigma 135 1.8 and i cried, i now use uv filters threaded on every lens i have

so if I got this correct... A wolverine (say a 82mm Neutral night filter) will fit on a Revolution 82mm magnetic ring but the other way around (a Revolution 82mm filter won't fit on a 82mm wolverine ring). ???

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Ай бұрын

opposite. The new Revolution 82s are slightly smaller. They fit fine onto a Wolverine, but the Wolverine is too big to put on a Revolution.

Does anyone know the difference between the Skyeye and the Revolution filters?

@HudsonHenryPhoto

Жыл бұрын

There's a reason I don't carry skyeye in my store. Www.hudsonhenry.com/kase They have a full filter thread in front to catch a traditional filter. You can't stack other magnetics with them, and they become thick and bulky with potential vignetting. All the great advantages of the revolution line are negated.

@PharaohMan007

Жыл бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto ah! Thanks for the explanation!

@PharaohMan007

Жыл бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto I have a set and can stack magnetics with them but yes, there is a thread now I see.

Hi can you put me a kit together 112mm with 3 stop 6 stop 10 stop and polarized filter with all the step down ring I need them to work on all the newest and the best z lens I would appreciate you putting me a kit to do it all thanks

@HudsonHenryPhoto

9 ай бұрын

That's all easily available at www.hudsonhenry.com/kase. You can email me if you need more help, but I'm in and out of data range in Yellowstone running a workshop so be patient. hi@hudsonhenry.com

@Jwitherow1964

9 ай бұрын

@@HudsonHenryPhoto thanks this was helpful I am looking forward to my order

Much prefer Maven over Kase filters!

@zZola_Photography

Жыл бұрын

Michael the Maven is good ppl! I love his kit

@mluu83

Жыл бұрын

What makes you prefer the Maven? Did you compare them side by side?

@zZola_Photography

Жыл бұрын

@@mluu83 i have both kits granted my kase are 82mm and my mavin are 112mm, but the mags are much stronger and i actually really like the textured identifiers on maven. And lastly maven is a small brand by a single dedicated down to earth photographer and I really like that aspect

@TimvanderLeeuw

Жыл бұрын

I love my Maven filters, but have no experience with the Kase filters! I really like the colour coding on the Maven filters and also the knurling that helps quickly see the type or strength of filter.

@gosman949

Жыл бұрын

@@TimvanderLeeuw which is cheaper? Prices have got to come down!