www.suncatchersolarstore.com

You said you would test these in a day or so and you did! Weird how they're showing different power draws for the same load in the same conditions.

I have the max also, it higher in watts than my other generators. The solar input is the benefit with the AC200MAX i put 1200-1300 though pv.

@gieb6428

Жыл бұрын

I thought the max solar only input was 900w

@zfontain1975

Жыл бұрын

@garygiebler6428 charge enhanced another 500 watts and it work well.

Great video.BTW, do both unit put out 120V when running the A/C? May be one has lower AC output Voltage than the other thus not the same result for the Wattage.

thanks for the no bull comparison, you put it in la-mans terms.

which one do you like better the anker 767 or delta ecco flow pro

@Suncatcher-wt2od

10 ай бұрын

I don’t have any experience with the Ecoflow. I personally use the Bluetti AC200max as our backup for power outages. Not that I chose it over Anker but because it was first to come out. They both have there pros and cons. The Anker 767 seems a little more efficient because the inverter doesn’t seem to use as much power as the Bluetti Ac200max But the Ac200max can be expanded with 2 expansion batteries tripling watt hours. Compared to just one expansion battery for the Anker 767 doubling watt hours. These are just a few of the pros and cons. Bluetti AcC200max gives you a larger section of solar panels to choose from when getting panels for it. It can take up to 150 volts and 900 watts solar input which makes it easier when shopping for different solar panels other than the Bluetti brand. Anker 767 can take up to 60 volts which makes it a little tricker when trying to find panels outside the Anker brand to max it out to it’s rated 1000 watt solar input. If at all possible I would recommend get the panels that are recommended by Bluetti and Anker for their products but I know this isn’t always the case. I use different brand panels without issues just have to make sure they stay within the voltage range. The Anker 767 has the super fast wall charging. It chargers at 1400 watts with a wall outlet so the power station can be charged back up from 0 to 100% in about 2 hours or less when charging it with wall outlet. The Bluetti takes in about 450watts from the wall so charge time is at less twice as long or longer when charging with wall outlet. I like that the Anker 767 isn’t touch screen it has buttons Ac200max is touch screen. I prefer the buttons. Haven’t had any trouble with the touch screen just like the buttons better. Anker 767 has ups feature Bluett ac200max doesn’t You can charge with solar and wall outlet same time on Bluetti Anker 767 you can not it’s one or the other. The wheels make it easier to move around for the Anker. Both of them way around 60 pounds. Those are some of the bigger differences I can think of, there are a few other but those are the bigger ones I’ve noticed. I’ve tested both of them out a good bit without any issues. Either one would be a good choice in my opinion.

@venegascapital

10 ай бұрын

@@Suncatcher-wt2od Great info. Thanks for taking the time to respond