Animation - Leonardo Da Vinci Mechanism

Ғылым және технология

This Device For Grinding Concave Mirrors by Leonardo da Vinci used for example to weld sections of
enormous copper sphere of the dome, the cathedral Santa Maria Del Fiore in Firenze, Italy.
The aim of this animation movie was to understand how this machine designed to work, and bring it to life.
Credits for the music:
Mike Oldfield - Oceania
Infected Mushroom - Shakawkaw
Pipeline - the alan parsons project
Blackmore's Night - Fayre Thee Well

Пікірлер: 460

  • @vincentrobinette1507
    @vincentrobinette15073 жыл бұрын

    There is one thing missing from this animation: A mechanism to raise the turntable as material is ground away by the disc.

  • @pod9363

    @pod9363

    3 жыл бұрын

    Leonardo Da Caprio confirmed for ding dong :O

  • @james_bond1869

    @james_bond1869

    3 жыл бұрын

    I was looking to see if anyone noticed that too. Also it appears the vertical gear between the two horizontal gears is redundant. Rather you could have both horizontal gears spin as a single unit which would reduce part count and inefficient power transfer

  • @james_bond1869

    @james_bond1869

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Green Lizard right, it's just that spinning the opposite direction isn't needed as it will make a rounded mirror either way.

  • @james_bond1869

    @james_bond1869

    3 жыл бұрын

    @noxxi knox lol, i get your point though. I thought about how supporting a long gear like that may not have been as simple but i am thinking not. He didn't have all of the design that we have now to go off of though. If you think this stuff is interesting, then you should check out the game "Besiege." I have a few videos of some of my creations.

  • @knuffelbaer1971

    @knuffelbaer1971

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@james_bond1869 maybe it depends on the rotational direction of the mirror that there is this vertical gear involved. it inverts the rotation direction...

  • @brucerogermorgan2388
    @brucerogermorgan23883 жыл бұрын

    Interesting but very slow, I almost fell asleep watching it. Da Vinci was certainly a genius hundreds of years ahead of his time.

  • @reasonablespeculation3893

    @reasonablespeculation3893

    3 жыл бұрын

    Slow is better if you want to see the connection points and direction of each part...

  • @reasonablespeculation3893

    @reasonablespeculation3893

    3 жыл бұрын

    @juggliar Agreed

  • @Awesomes007

    @Awesomes007

    3 жыл бұрын

    Bruce Roger Morgan maybe he invented it as a cure for insomnia?

  • @sgtben88hun17

    @sgtben88hun17

    3 жыл бұрын

    Well, the Romans had used steam, to power machines. The world had to wait 2000 years to reinvent it. In India, they were thinking about Atoms, way back.... Just think, how many inventions lost due to time. Worlds first cars, were actually electric cars. History repeats itself :)

  • @brucerogermorgan2388

    @brucerogermorgan2388

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@sgtben88hun17 Worlds first cars were not electric. England was building steam busses in the 1800's, Karl Benz built one of the first petrol powered cars at the end of the 19th. century. USA, Europe and Britain were building petrol cars at the end of the 19th. century and the first few years of the 20th. century, all before the first electric cars were made.

  • @dionyzus2909
    @dionyzus29093 жыл бұрын

    didn't expect to hear infected mushroom here

  • @tunnelsnake627

    @tunnelsnake627

    3 жыл бұрын

    I love infected mushroom. What you're favorite album?

  • @Leo_Davis_

    @Leo_Davis_

    3 жыл бұрын

    Shpongled

  • @thomashughes4859
    @thomashughes48594 жыл бұрын

    The glass is placed on the table wheel and the gap between that table and the crank wheel and its radius determines the size and pitch of the convexiture. Great animation!

  • @TheCleverJoker
    @TheCleverJoker3 жыл бұрын

    The animation was drawn out so much more than it needed to, do we really need to see every peg go into every hole 1 by 1

  • @alexbard4437

    @alexbard4437

    3 жыл бұрын

    yes

  • @randymagnum143

    @randymagnum143

    3 жыл бұрын

    And also.......yes.

  • @quantumleap4023

    @quantumleap4023

    3 жыл бұрын

    Geez whats your guys problem? You are witnessing the work of a master artist who devoted millions of hours of his life to creating amazing peices of work... that are now recreated and rendered digitally, turned into full assembly instructions, animated to show functionality and delivered to you via KZread for free... honestly one of the coolest things you could ever watch... yet you still have the audacity to complain about the lengthieness of a 4 and a half minute long video. How absolutely pathetic...

  • @quantumleap4023

    @quantumleap4023

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Repomeister ok.

  • @matthewg1789

    @matthewg1789

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@quantumleap4023 da vinci only lived for 600,000 hours or so. He didn't spend millions of hours on any thing....idiot.

  • @imdeplorable2241
    @imdeplorable22413 жыл бұрын

    I liked this animation. Easy to see and understand. Well done, sir. Well done.

  • @wildbillfirehands
    @wildbillfirehands3 жыл бұрын

    I see we didn't get all the way to grinding mirrors, but Vinci was beyond brilliant, and the computer graphics are astounding. Well done.

  • @saa82vik
    @saa82vik3 жыл бұрын

    One has to provide for height adjustment of the mirror as the grinding process makes it more concave...

  • @vincentrobinette1507

    @vincentrobinette1507

    3 жыл бұрын

    Exactly! I noticed the same thing.

  • @pirobot668beta

    @pirobot668beta

    3 жыл бұрын

    And how to compensate for the grinding wheel losing material?...That reduces the radius of the wheel, changing the focal length of the ground mirrors. Or do we get a new grinding wheel for each mirror? Can't just move the bits closer together, the radius of each mirror is gonna be a bit different from any other. I doubt the grinding wheel was diamond coated steel...

  • @NCF8710

    @NCF8710

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@pirobot668beta The grindstone was probably a lot harder than glass. Wear, however minor is inevitable.

  • @saa82vik

    @saa82vik

    3 жыл бұрын

    Greg Gallacci indeed, using the 'dry' stone method what you say it's inevitable: with this method you produce curved mirrors (not perfectly spherical) but this as with everything is a question of approximation. I'd say that for the applications and the technology of the XV century, it would have been enough. Besides wear off of the average surface, this method would have give a rather coarse ground mirror tho. On the other side, wetting the stone with a slurry in which you disperse ground quartz-based stone fragments that will do the grinding reduces wear and will produce a better result. Also, progressively reducing particle sizes will also decrease surface roughness down to the desired optical quality. These are advances made mostly in the XVII-XVIII centuries tho. similar techniques are used today in optics grinding and polishing

  • @marcushendriksen8415

    @marcushendriksen8415

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@saa82vik XVII - XVIII centuries? What a fucking tool, the rest of the civilised world would call them the 17th and 18th centuries

  • @peters972
    @peters9723 жыл бұрын

    Concave mirrors were in desperately short supply at the time and they were looking for a way to ramp up production.

  • @Northeagle66
    @Northeagle663 жыл бұрын

    So well done and very instructive.

  • @whyohwhy357
    @whyohwhy3572 жыл бұрын

    Thank you!

  • @jameseddy6835
    @jameseddy68353 жыл бұрын

    amazing animation. really shows how things worked

  • @atheefmuhammad6705
    @atheefmuhammad67053 жыл бұрын

    You are awesome man you made this before 7 years Respect

  • @smeeegheeeed1
    @smeeegheeeed14 жыл бұрын

    Great job! I think there must be more to it as the distance between the grinding wheel and the target look set and would need the ability to drop or raise the target but gets the concept across nicely, well done

  • @1islam1

    @1islam1

    3 жыл бұрын

    🔴 What Is Islam? ⚠️ 🔴 Islam is not just another religion. 🔵 It is the same message preached by Moses, Jesus and Abraham. 🔴 Islam literally means ‘submission to God’ and it teaches us to have a direct relationship with God. 🔵 It reminds us that since God created us, no one should be worshipped except God alone. 🔴 It also teaches that God is nothing like a human being or like anything that we can imagine. 🌍 The concept of God is summarized in the Quran as: 📖 { “Say, He is God, the One. God, the Absolute. He does not give birth, nor was He born, and there is nothing like Him.”} (Quran 112:1-4)[4] 📚 🔴 Becoming a Muslim is not turning your back to Jesus. 🔵 Rather it’s going back to the original teachings of Jesus and obeying him.

  • @webjohn

    @webjohn

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@1islam1 wtf this is NOT the group for the anonymous muslims

  • @TheAechBomb

    @TheAechBomb

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@1islam1 while I believe in education, thus is a pretty odd place to put your message

  • @GroovesAndLands

    @GroovesAndLands

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@1islam1 I hope you're saying this to all the islamists that believe in "convert by the sword" and other forms of submission to the Caliphate. To my eyes, Muhammed was a crazy pedophile, and islam is about submission to islam - by any and all means necessary. Much improvement needed in your religion of "peace".

  • @carlthornton3076
    @carlthornton30763 жыл бұрын

    Very Good!!!

  • @keefsmiff
    @keefsmiff3 жыл бұрын

    Infected Mushroom... nice music choice ..class

  • @Tadesan
    @Tadesan4 жыл бұрын

    Infected mushroom. Nice.

  • @juanmanuelvelazquez101
    @juanmanuelvelazquez1015 жыл бұрын

    very good animation

  • @zdjparty
    @zdjparty6 жыл бұрын

    Cool

  • @sakura_pompadour
    @sakura_pompadour3 жыл бұрын

    Omg I'm such a fan of his work, wish I could get an autograph!

  • @handmaderestor
    @handmaderestor3 жыл бұрын

    *Your work is outstanding, impeccable. Love it when you use another Gressel vice to fix the other*

  • @gralfca
    @gralfca4 жыл бұрын

    spherical

  • @the_original_Bilb_Ono
    @the_original_Bilb_Ono3 жыл бұрын

    I fell asleep last night watching this. Lol.

  • @GrantBeardsley
    @GrantBeardsley5 жыл бұрын

    Very interesting 👍

  • @user-ux9fo8dq2k
    @user-ux9fo8dq2k5 жыл бұрын

    Nice& cool

  • @creativsi83
    @creativsi83 Жыл бұрын

    Great job and good value for money

  • @SwarthySkinnedOne
    @SwarthySkinnedOne5 жыл бұрын

    I guess Da Vinci was some kind of a mechanical genius. I read in a 1961 US Air Force text book for English Comp classes that Da Vincci was a very strong man. Said he could bend horse shoes out of shape with his bare hands. Sure wouldn't want him to ask me to step out outside into some back alley with him for pissing him off. Anyhow, I really dig that "Assembly" music. All electric man:). Actually the animation is quite nice, goes swell with the music. How'd you do all that man???

  • @kerbodynamicx472

    @kerbodynamicx472

    3 жыл бұрын

    He is a very intelligent man too... did he use his hands, or some lever mechanism?

  • @Amipotsophspond
    @Amipotsophspond5 жыл бұрын

    so something with medieval plans was the engineer would leave things out. the plans would be given to worker then the craftsman would finish the parts that made it work well. this device is grinding mirrors, it could be also used as millstone that rotates as it spins. however to make it grind a convex thing you need some way to move the bottom gear up. this could be done by making a separation of the two gears then putting something on top of the lower gear that pushes the work piece up or by making something to rise the lower gear such as gear cage that tilted at 45 degrees and can pushed towards the lower gear's center. the wooden materials might require more then one of these slanted cages but that would give finer control. or you could use sand in a that you pore below the axis of the lower gear, the sand would be contained in a pipe that also keeps the axis straight. this would give fine control and support the heavy lower millstone. but your lower gear axis would need to be replaced and lower pipe as it is eaten away.

  • @bobbrenna9507

    @bobbrenna9507

    3 жыл бұрын

    Just raise it slowly with a lever.

  • @kayhankurul4113
    @kayhankurul41135 жыл бұрын

    Congrulations! It was very good animation. I am wondering, With which book I can learn best about Da Vinci for himself and its inventions?

  • @backtobasic9167

    @backtobasic9167

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thank you, there's so many, i don't remember from which book i learned about this machine

  • @davidcarbonnel6396
    @davidcarbonnel63963 жыл бұрын

    Love that Mike Oldfield song

  • @manoelj1951
    @manoelj19514 жыл бұрын

    parabens por postar coisa util que agrega na vida dos jovens. grato

  • @_Hound_
    @_Hound_3 жыл бұрын

    If Da Vinci was so smart, then why didn't he just buy concave mirrors at the concave mirror store?

  • @Seventhsu

    @Seventhsu

    3 жыл бұрын

    from above Cause the store only sold flat mirrors, he had to make his own concave mirrors

  • @Kayden-bb9zt

    @Kayden-bb9zt

    3 жыл бұрын

    He was a cheap ass

  • @karldavis7392

    @karldavis7392

    3 жыл бұрын

    Because they're cheaper on-line?

  • @Seventhsu

    @Seventhsu

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@karldavis7392 The USPS doesn't exist in French, I reckon he had to use the FSPS or something to deliver it to his house

  • @theludonarrian
    @theludonarrian3 жыл бұрын

    Where's the part where rhe glass is put in and ground?

  • @derrickshepherd3472

    @derrickshepherd3472

    3 жыл бұрын

    The glass is on the bottom bro

  • @derrickshepherd3472

    @derrickshepherd3472

    3 жыл бұрын

    At 1:22

  • @theludonarrian

    @theludonarrian

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@derrickshepherd3472 seeing as its the same color as the grindstone, I don't think thats the glass. Why wouldn't it be clearer?

  • @squirrelly1375

    @squirrelly1375

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@theludonarrian glass is transparent you are seeing the grindstone through the glass

  • @XVAwin
    @XVAwin3 жыл бұрын

    Huge thanks to youtube dev for made those "Playback speed"

  • @ChicoPulpo117
    @ChicoPulpo1173 жыл бұрын

    This can be done to generate electro static?

  • @DarkMoonDroid
    @DarkMoonDroid3 жыл бұрын

    I think Leonardo was my favorite scientist.

  • @gangadharpinapatruni4963
    @gangadharpinapatruni49635 жыл бұрын

    Amazing work, may I know what is the tool used.

  • @backtobasic9167

    @backtobasic9167

    5 жыл бұрын

    Thanks it is made using Microstation

  • @Bean-Time

    @Bean-Time

    3 жыл бұрын

    Screwdriver

  • @haidafella8651
    @haidafella86513 жыл бұрын

    There’s an issue.. the wheel could not rest on the glass surface, and as is would run its elf out of material almost immediately. Can’t imagine DaVinci missed that.. there must be some other mechanism

  • @alexp6013

    @alexp6013

    3 жыл бұрын

    Da Vinci didn't try a lot of its inventions, and a lot of them have such flaws.

  • @Mezzo_Roo

    @Mezzo_Roo

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@alexp6013 the second cyllindrical gear is very long to accommodate a piece of glass, then over time as the glass is ground, the platform is raised to slowly remove more material. It didn't show it here, but the edge of the grinding wheel would have to be rounded in order to get a nice concave surface.

  • @greasemonkey7221
    @greasemonkey72213 жыл бұрын

    *_Daa'VinKi?_*

  • @YC-xr6si

    @YC-xr6si

    3 жыл бұрын

    the man who painted the mona lisa

  • @tindurleskin5851

    @tindurleskin5851

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yes! I have found it!

  • @greasemonkey7221

    @greasemonkey7221

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@tindurleskin5851 *_!Congratulations!_*

  • @greasemonkey7221

    @greasemonkey7221

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Loona The Hellhound Da who?

  • @user-pv5yh4de6f
    @user-pv5yh4de6f Жыл бұрын

    좋은정보 감사합니다

  • @surendra1990
    @surendra19907 жыл бұрын

    Should be taught in all the schools and to an every student.

  • @sasa76564
    @sasa765645 жыл бұрын

    Bello

  • @thanhtubemechanical3637
    @thanhtubemechanical36375 жыл бұрын

    good

  • @olivermendes5696
    @olivermendes56963 жыл бұрын

    actually there is no need for the side cog, only a longer cog is needed for perpendicular change of rotatory motion.

  • @AnshuSingh-rh2vz

    @AnshuSingh-rh2vz

    3 жыл бұрын

    It works as the gear.

  • @theophilhist6455

    @theophilhist6455

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@AnshuSingh-rh2vz but perhaps works it more like an idler pully/stabilizer...if the rpm speed were to be greater

  • @alvarodavid9566

    @alvarodavid9566

    3 жыл бұрын

    Let's suppose Leonardo wanted to feel himself secure while making this.

  • @user-us7ib3je2c
    @user-us7ib3je2c3 жыл бұрын

    Please name the animation program

  • @joeyjazz4013
    @joeyjazz40133 жыл бұрын

    Can't help but get mad at the misaligned pins at 1:42 .

  • @adriansue8955
    @adriansue89552 жыл бұрын

    Why did he have the two 'squirrel cage' gears? why not just a single tall one? Was the direction reversal of having two important in some way?

  • @gunner4lyfe723
    @gunner4lyfe7233 жыл бұрын

    What I'm interested is what the process was to grind the mirrors into a concave shape. Never showed that.

  • @swamifb975
    @swamifb9753 жыл бұрын

    Even at x2 playback speed, it is slow.....

  • @ItsRaitisLV

    @ItsRaitisLV

    3 жыл бұрын

    No, your attention span has dropped significantly due to the constant overstimulation from the internet.

  • @swamifb975

    @swamifb975

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@ItsRaitisLV Is it ?. Very interesting .

  • @jeffcampsall5435
    @jeffcampsall54355 жыл бұрын

    I understand that the large grinding wheel approximates a parabolic curve on a small lens. There is nothing in da Vinci's drawing to describe how the grinder is lowered (or the lens platform raised) as the lens is ground? I would think it would be easier to raise the lens platform on its axis rather than lower the grinding wheel like I read some where else. The large gear on the right is not depicted in his drawing.

  • @Girotra20
    @Girotra203 жыл бұрын

    2nd roter will get blocked. 1st and 3rd will work fine. One has to redesign the project.

  • @Teagle

    @Teagle

    3 жыл бұрын

    What r u talking about, if all the rotors r independent it works fine

  • @judebarrett17

    @judebarrett17

    3 жыл бұрын

    Davinchi worked designs that did not work unless you knew what the flaw in the blueprints worked, he did this because patents were not a thing then.

  • @revimfadli4666

    @revimfadli4666

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@judebarrett17 that kinda makes sense, though some like the "helicopter" were probably mere illustrations/concepts?

  • @sirnikkel6746

    @sirnikkel6746

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@revimfadli4666 Yes. But I think that if you invert the helicoidal thing and put it inside a funnel you now have a powerful air injector for forges.

  • @lukasmodry196
    @lukasmodry1963 жыл бұрын

    Amd what was it for???

  • @kerbodynamicx472
    @kerbodynamicx4723 жыл бұрын

    Is the focal length of the mirror equivalent to the radius of the grinder?

  • @timh.6872

    @timh.6872

    3 жыл бұрын

    I beleive so, since only rays through the center of the grindwheel produce an image when reflected by the mirror. Not sure how useful this is, since those rays then leave the mirror along the same path they hit it, producing no useful magnification. Perhaps for increasing the effective light of candles without changing their spread?

  • @georgewaring7168

    @georgewaring7168

    3 жыл бұрын

    That what it's called for a spherical mirror (which is what this produces). But it's not the focal point. A mirror that focuses to a point - like that used in a telescope - has a parabolic shape, not a spherical shape.

  • @NCF8710
    @NCF87103 жыл бұрын

    Good way to make a spherical mirror.

  • @tigerseye73
    @tigerseye735 жыл бұрын

    Just a simple reversing gear. How do you get smooth concave movement?????????????????????????????????????

  • @backtobasic9167

    @backtobasic9167

    5 жыл бұрын

    It's part of the algorithm, I programmed it to ecalarat and decelerate, its nice that you noticed :)

  • @christopherrice2004
    @christopherrice20043 жыл бұрын

    Problem is, this mechanism creates a spherical mirror, which has spherical aberrations. This is why early telescopes made use of lenses, instead of mirrors. They did not care to pay the expense of the necessary corrective lenses on top of the cost of the mirrors. These days, we know how to make corrective lenses cheaply, but it's a lot easier to do it in software.

  • @StealthTheUnknown
    @StealthTheUnknown3 жыл бұрын

    Haha, nice choice of music. Shakawkaw by IM😎👌😁

  • @gerry343
    @gerry3434 жыл бұрын

    Why the reversing gear drive to the mirror? It would work just as well without this complication.

  • @mdtalhaansari1096

    @mdtalhaansari1096

    4 жыл бұрын

    My thoughts exactly.

  • @blackpurple9163
    @blackpurple91633 жыл бұрын

    I liked the animation, how did you make it, in learning to make such animations starting with simple ones, so which softwares did you use?

  • @idrisemregoncu4220

    @idrisemregoncu4220

    3 жыл бұрын

    It's solidworks

  • @stevesyncox9893
    @stevesyncox98933 жыл бұрын

    Point of contact would be relatively small, in this size of stone, grinding that size mirror would take a much larger stone wheel.

  • @mig_21bison
    @mig_21bison5 жыл бұрын

    How the grinding done...?

  • @TheAechBomb

    @TheAechBomb

    3 жыл бұрын

    the large vertical wheel is a grindstone, and the mirror is mounted on the lower rotor

  • @gandatube
    @gandatube3 жыл бұрын

    This would produce a spherical concave mirror. I was wondering if, by simply tilting the grinding wheel, the result would be parabolic.

  • @spacenoodles5570

    @spacenoodles5570

    3 жыл бұрын

    It would be elliptic, close but not quite a parabola

  • @ErikB605

    @ErikB605

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@spacenoodles5570 I wouldn't be elliptic. The outer edge would steepen as you tilt and a protrusion would form in the middle.

  • @vikapm

    @vikapm

    3 жыл бұрын

    That's clever. The question is what is more similar to a parabola (at least that small portion used as mirror), a segment of an ellipse or of a circle.

  • @ErikB605

    @ErikB605

    3 жыл бұрын

    ​@@vikapm A sphere is technically an ellipsoid. If you Imagine a sphere and stretch it it becomes more recognisable as one and at the same time you realise that you now have a problem because you stretched the focal point as well. If you want to mimic a parabolic mirror use the spherical one and get the biggest possible focal distance. At infinity you will approch a parabolic mirror.

  • @spacenoodles5570

    @spacenoodles5570

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@vikapm an ellipse is closer, since a parabola is an infinitely stretched ellipse, and an ellipse is a stretched circle

  • @galuhramaditya13
    @galuhramaditya133 жыл бұрын

    Sorry, can you explain what that mechanism for? Is it the first gear mechanism idea?

  • @janibert1437

    @janibert1437

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yes exactly looks like it doesnt do anything

  • @whyohwhy357

    @whyohwhy357

    2 жыл бұрын

    It says in the title that it is for grinding mirrors.

  • @minhhoangbinh5005
    @minhhoangbinh50053 жыл бұрын

    To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first, and call whatever you hit the target

  • @benztheprotogen3502
    @benztheprotogen35023 жыл бұрын

    Satisfying tho

  • @deep-seeker
    @deep-seeker3 жыл бұрын

    What is the purpose?

  • @gonzalofabiancastro1306
    @gonzalofabiancastro13062 ай бұрын

    Hola, muy buen trabajo, con que software realizaste el diseño y animacion?

  • @andreafraschetti2213
    @andreafraschetti22133 жыл бұрын

    Tutto molto bello... Ma quale dovrebbe essere l'uso finale?

  • @alekscvetochkin1924
    @alekscvetochkin19243 жыл бұрын

    Что ни говори а это был ГЕНИЙ всех времён и народов.

  • @rtrojosh

    @rtrojosh

    3 жыл бұрын

    uhh.. blyat?

  • @bode_fuceta
    @bode_fuceta3 жыл бұрын

    *Show! Mas pra que serve essa "engenhoca"?*

  • @brettzolstick989
    @brettzolstick9893 жыл бұрын

    Whats the purpose of the lower vertical gear? Wouldn't it be simpler to just have one longer one going from top to bottom? It seems all it does is reverse the direction of the bottom plate.

  • @danielclasson1879
    @danielclasson18793 жыл бұрын

    Infected Mushroom!

  • @rizaldolah4282
    @rizaldolah42824 жыл бұрын

    What software you use to design thies??

  • @andantino03
    @andantino033 жыл бұрын

    Tiktok guy: "Davingci?!"

  • @anjo7465

    @anjo7465

    3 жыл бұрын

    funny

  • @andantino03

    @andantino03

    3 жыл бұрын

    @Dr.Cemong most of it

  • @bone1264
    @bone12645 жыл бұрын

    Genius Art 👌

  • @johnpossum556
    @johnpossum5567 жыл бұрын

    In minute 2 to 3 that is really the music of Alan Parsons Project.

  • @MichelJosephCardin

    @MichelJosephCardin

    4 жыл бұрын

    Had one of his tapes when I was a kid and remember loving it; only had a few tapes. LOL

  • @johnpossum556

    @johnpossum556

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@MichelJosephCardin He's awesome. You can listen to most of his stuff free right here on YT. He's undoubtedly one of the musical geniuses that many people only barely know.

  • @MichelJosephCardin

    @MichelJosephCardin

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@johnpossum556 I did re-visit and didn't like it anymore but will try again right now

  • @amyvari4462
    @amyvari44624 жыл бұрын

    Which software is this??

  • @user-dc7lv2nb8m
    @user-dc7lv2nb8m5 жыл бұрын

    А зачем сие устройство?

  • @nativeafroeurasian
    @nativeafroeurasian3 жыл бұрын

    1. Why was this invented many hundred years after the gear weel? 2. Why do you shift the energy so often if you could just connect the first and the last weel (for opposite turning a third inbetween) instead of using 5? 3. What do you need it for? (It alone, I understand you would build it into machines but I guess it's not an extraordaniry invention since everyone would have that idea)

  • @skygamer874
    @skygamer8745 жыл бұрын

    What's the name of the software which you used to create this mechanism?

  • @backtobasic9167

    @backtobasic9167

    5 жыл бұрын

    Microstation

  • @mdarman-wg6ph
    @mdarman-wg6ph4 жыл бұрын

    What is the application of this mechanism. ...???? Please reply. ....!!!

  • @alexanderstohr4198

    @alexanderstohr4198

    4 жыл бұрын

    grinding glass or other items to concave shapes - for examples for lenses used in a telescope.

  • @GianfrancoFronzi
    @GianfrancoFronzi4 жыл бұрын

    I have seen many videos on DaVinci inventions and I find that most don't know completely how the invention works and mistakenly leave out parts or have the wrong movement. Sometimes I believe DaVinci could possibly be doing it on purpose to confuse the people, a form medieval patent you could say.

  • @alexanderstohr4198

    @alexanderstohr4198

    4 жыл бұрын

    that might be true. but do you see anything in this machine that would classify in such a way? (something that needs to be added or changed to make the machine really work with success - in contrast to the original drawings.)

  • @sirnikkel6746

    @sirnikkel6746

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@alexanderstohr4198 Making the central axle of the gears not directly connected to each other.

  • @alexanderstohr4198

    @alexanderstohr4198

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@sirnikkel6746 What if... the handle of the crank was never meant by DaVinci to be on the grinding stone axis?!? A very fine location for a turning handle would be the very far aside gear that grips into the two vertical cylindrical gears. Why? Because a permanent hard push and pull on the grinding stone axis would bring it out of balance and thus reduce the achievable quality of the grinding quite noticeably. when putting the "rough" force to the outer gear it would be much lesser in its damaging impact. other than that - with the two sided force on those the "reversal" gear balance of masses is also much better.

  • @markgoddard2560
    @markgoddard25603 жыл бұрын

    I’m sure leonardo would never have been able to think of this with such awful background music going on.

  • @WryGrass100

    @WryGrass100

    3 жыл бұрын

    Thank you. I just can't figure out what music has to do with these types of videos.

  • @drumrollplease631

    @drumrollplease631

    3 жыл бұрын

    I was about to say, “hey, It isn’t that bad” then it kicked in

  • @kevincaruthers5412

    @kevincaruthers5412

    3 жыл бұрын

    But he might have thought to turn the sound off, like I did. :)

  • @jestnutz

    @jestnutz

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@drumrollplease631 yeop me too, listening twice hits different

  • @rongarza9488
    @rongarza94883 жыл бұрын

    Rotating a disk laying flat atop another will make one concave and the other convex.

  • @notsoancientpelican

    @notsoancientpelican

    3 жыл бұрын

    That is an elegant solution. However the wear rate producing the abrasion would vary with the speed of the radial point, which would be a linear relationship. It seems this would produce a spherical section, rather than a parabolic one. Also the disks would have to be separated periodically to remove the detritus of the abrasive process, the accumulation of which would act to deform uniform wear and thus affect the shapes of both the worked and working disks.

  • @pawel1465
    @pawel14653 жыл бұрын

    Gościu był super, wymyślał rzeczy które obecnie są w stanie wymyślić zwykli uczniowie szkoły podstawowej...

  • @w.binder-freecadchannel
    @w.binder-freecadchannel4 жыл бұрын

    What is it good for?

  • @harnoorsingh2866
    @harnoorsingh28663 жыл бұрын

    What is its usage?

  • @CDP5872
    @CDP58725 жыл бұрын

    Good but can anyone state use of that vertical gear like wheel on right side.

  • @SmashCrunch

    @SmashCrunch

    5 жыл бұрын

    Changing gear ratios between the two horizontal gears, and also to withstand the torque so it doesn't all have to transfer through the thin vertical piece connecting the horizontal gears.

  • @alexanderstohr4198

    @alexanderstohr4198

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@SmashCrunch - really? not evident and neither depicted. making the vertical axis as thick as needed is not a problem at all. expecting extreme loads for needing a thick vertical axis is neither true.

  • @SmashCrunch

    @SmashCrunch

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@alexanderstohr4198 It reverses the direction of the horizontal gears and helps bear the forces of turning the bottom platform. AKA changing gear ratio from positive to negative.

  • @jamesamatrais234
    @jamesamatrais2344 жыл бұрын

    How do u make such videos

  • @SI-GOD

    @SI-GOD

    4 жыл бұрын

    I have a few video projects that could definitely benefit from wherever program you used to make this. Please share a link to where we can get it.

  • @ErikKnear
    @ErikKnear3 жыл бұрын

    Wouldn't it work fine with just the two wheels?

  • @CesarGC76
    @CesarGC763 жыл бұрын

    Could not figure out what this contraction was for. What is it used for?

  • @ClubPenguinMaster88
    @ClubPenguinMaster883 жыл бұрын

    Very nice, but why does it reverse direction on the shaft downwards? It just seems like a useless loss of energy.

  • @maybehesbornwithitmaybeits9318
    @maybehesbornwithitmaybeits93183 жыл бұрын

    this guy was awesome in the revenent!

  • @MetrologyEngineer
    @MetrologyEngineer3 жыл бұрын

    I don't understand how it works... It's confusing how the large wheel and plate on the bottom are interacting. Still very interesting; I thought it was cool how the pegs functioned as rudimentary gears.

  • @Gorgutek1
    @Gorgutek13 жыл бұрын

    1:45 the pins aren't in circle. They dont fit the holes

  • @sawnyone

    @sawnyone

    3 жыл бұрын

    Реально автор провтыкал правильно связи указать ))

  • @0yah0yah06

    @0yah0yah06

    3 жыл бұрын

    whete did youngte yhat frm

  • @0yah0yah06

    @0yah0yah06

    3 жыл бұрын

    where did you get that from?

  • @Gorgutek1

    @Gorgutek1

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@0yah0yah06 get what? you really don't see it? :D

  • @TheAechBomb

    @TheAechBomb

    3 жыл бұрын

    yeah, looks like a problem in the animation, two of them are offset

  • @enesyurtsever
    @enesyurtsever3 жыл бұрын

    What is the purpose of this mechanism?

  • @jatwangismyname900
    @jatwangismyname9003 жыл бұрын

    I still did not understand. Someone please enlighten me, what this device does

  • @jesuschristcunt8469

    @jesuschristcunt8469

    3 жыл бұрын

    Usually used for rocket fuel on board ISS but in this case it was used for the storage of rat/rodent death by beheadings.

  • @NCF8710

    @NCF8710

    3 жыл бұрын

    Used to make a mirror for a telescope, most likely.

  • @jesuschristcunt8469

    @jesuschristcunt8469

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@NCF8710 wrong

  • @mithileshkumar_official
    @mithileshkumar_official5 жыл бұрын

    Where this mechanism can use

  • @backtobasic9167

    @backtobasic9167

    5 жыл бұрын

    See an answer in the comments

  • @iulianzagan779

    @iulianzagan779

    3 жыл бұрын

    It's used for grinding mirrors but I believe it's not properly drawn. Lital baruch, very poor quality answer you provided, actually it's the definition of a non-answer! Is this the way you usually help people? Too bad!

  • @xsAMOR

    @xsAMOR

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@iulianzagan779 Totally agree! He made animation, then took his time to answer, but give a lousy one.

  • @IronMan-yg4qw
    @IronMan-yg4qw6 жыл бұрын

    hey. the gear teeth on the far right gear is going through the middle gear, to the left of it,.

  • @Docv400
    @Docv4003 жыл бұрын

    Why does the mechanism need the reverse drive part, surely it would work with the disc turning either way?

  • @HogTieChamp

    @HogTieChamp

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sure, it helps to turn the lower platter in opposition to the direction of the grinding wheel, but if true, you would need that complicated 3-gear "reverser" gizmo. Just lift the take-off gear to the TOP of the grinding wheel! Of course, in this animation, it doesn't make sense either way. All this thing might do is put a 1/4-inch dimple in the middle of the surface. Makes no sense.

  • @Docv400

    @Docv400

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@HogTieChamp I don't see it, the relative motion between the Grinding Disc and the Lens is identical in either direction, as there's contact on both sides of the Axis (of the Lens). The Lens would obviously be on a moveable mechanism, to raise it as required, this is just a basic representation of the machine to show the idea.

Келесі