Another great video! Guidance please, if I am shooting 35mm Nikon film cameras while traveling- landscapes, portraits, PJ- and don't want to carry all the beauties you just showed, which two or three would you suggest man? Thanks in advance!

Hello Ken, love all your videos, keep up the good work... For sure I agree with you with respect to the Zeiss Milvus line. However I have the Zeiss 25mm F/2.0 and I must say it's one of my favorite lenses, love the quality, a really nice lens. Anyway, as I said, keep up the good work...

Very very useful review. Have been wondering whether to sell some stuff to get the planar 85 and/or the 50 1.4. Have used ( and still use for film ) the planar 85/1.4 and the 50 ( 1.7 and 1.4 ) and dist 28/2.8 on contax bodies for 20+ years. I assume that these ZF/ZF.2's are basically the same lens formula ? In C/Y form the planars give really beautiful results - but I haven't had much else to compare them to. Never really took to the Sonnar 135- preferred the old SP adaptall2 70-210 3.5 until I sold it ( don't know why I did ?? ).

Hello, my friend. Great video, as per usual. Quick question - what are your thoughts on the zeiss contax lenses? They seem to be dirt cheap on eBay and have a good reputation.

hello Ken, I have the Zeiss 25/1.2 and I can say it's one of my favorite lenses, really love the quality coming out of this lens. Anyway, love your show, keep up the good work...

Which is the best professional prime lenses for Nikon D7200?Please suggest in details

what do you think is the better Zeiss for black and white portraiture: The 85mm f1.4 or the 100mm f2?

I get that you don't like the Distagon 21mm, but could you please be a little more specific as to *why* you feel that way about it? I ask because I've been contemplating getting one, and other reviewers online (photozone.de, the-digital-picture.com, b&h customer reviews etc.) doesn't exactly share in your disapproval. Hence, I would like the specifics of your experience with it. Great site you have, by the way :) Thank you.

I noticed you store your lenses with a fully closed iris, is it better to do that then leave it wide open? Does it matter? Same with storing sideways to upright, does that even matter? Thanks for your videos! :)

@kathodosdotcom

7 жыл бұрын

depends on the aperture, some are at rest open (mostly old ones).....

@simongardiner1070

7 жыл бұрын

Thanks mate, thanks for your channel!

Hi Ken. Just watched your review of "All Zeiss Lenses", from Oct. 3, 2015. Very helpful, but you never mentioned the Zeiss 50mm. Macro Planar. Would you rate it as highly as the 100mm. Macro Planar? I have a chance to pick up a used one for a good price.

@kathodosdotcom

7 жыл бұрын

tokina 100mm 2.8 is easier to use, has AF, much cheaper, and plenty just as good

How does the 135mm Zeiss compare to the 135mm 1:2 Ai-S Nikkor?

I only have a Nikon f3hp with planar 50mm and 85mm. I want you set someday :D

I've commenting in a lot of videos, but is there any difference between the Zeiss Planar that's does not says ZF 2 and the only that's only ZF? The ones ZF are a bit cheaper than the ZF 2 that you show in this video

@TheGreatLoco

3 жыл бұрын

The ZF lenses are AI-S lenses, so no S or P modes (unless you use the FA or maybe the F4, but I'm not sure about the second camera) and no aperture control by camera rocker, only by the aperture ring. ZF.2 are like AI-P lenses that Nikon made a few. Full PASM control, no need to setup non-CPU lens before using and aperture control by camera's rocker. One thing ZF.2 lenses miss is the aperture prong used by some pre mid-70's film cameras. Though, you could glue a dendalion chip to a ZF/AI-S lens which once programmed with the camera, will became a ZF.2/AI-P lens. But I would bother, honestly. Basically, ZF or ZF.2, it's the same thing. But if you want to sell a ZF lens, it may be complicated.

Want to ask you one question: is Zeiss 25mm F2 (or even F2.8) will be really better then Nikon 24mm F2.8 Ai, if I usually shoot at F5.6 or F8, and use it for black and white photography with my D3s? Nikon cost about 170 USD, Zeiss 25mm F2 cost about 750 USD, Zeiss 25mm F2.8 cost about 450 USD. What you will reccomend? Is it there really big difference between that lenses as we see by prices? Thanks in advance!!!!

Will the older version zeiss 85 1.4 T planar identical to this ?

@Funktrainer

3 жыл бұрын

Yes, of course. You only loose the CPU contacts. Best 85mm 1.4 ever made.

Have you tried out the Zeiss 135mm f/2 APO Sonnar T* ZF.2 (Nikon)? Do you recommend that lens?

@TheGreatLoco

3 жыл бұрын

Says it's not as good as the Nikon 135mm f/2.0 DC AF-D

Hey ken how about a video about how to store lenses and cameras. I see you use some kind of plastic case with custom foam? What type of foam is it? What case would you recommend for good price/quality ratio?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Marko Posavec ive made many such videos already :)

@markoposavec9240

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis Thanks, I got lost in all the videos and didn't notice that you already made them :)

Hey I found a Carl Zeiss 85mm 1.4 planar t for $500 brand new? Should I just pull the trigger and get it? Is that a good price still? Thanks.

@bijosn

8 ай бұрын

Yes

Hey Ken. The Zeiss 15mm F2.8 Distagon ZF2/ZE is made in Japan. The ZM 15mm, F2.8 is made in Germany and costs $5000.

hello, why did you put filter on all those lenses? what kind of filter? thanks

@Mischkovonik

3 жыл бұрын

Your question is one year old, but maybe you - or someone else, reading this- finds it helpfull: I think these are uv filters, they have as good as no effect on the image. However, they protect the frontelement! Even when you have insurance on the expensive stuff, its still easier to replace a 10€ filter, than a lens. And there are actually ireplacable lenses, where no insurance in the world can bring them back...

I have been going back and forth between the Nikkor 20 mm 1.8g and the Zeiss 21 or the Zeiss 18. I know you do not like the Zeiss wide angles as much as the nikkors. Just curious why? I have looked at many photos on flicker and the Zeiss lenses produce stunning images, closer resembling my older nikkors in color rendition and depth, just better. The newer nikkors images look flat and I always thought the colors were not as good as the old nikkors. So why do you like the newer Nikkor wides more than the Zeiss with the fabulous all glass micro contrast. I know the newer nikkors are sharp in the corners but I find it hard to believe the Zeiss would suffer in this area, especially at apertures used for landscapes. The detail from the Zeiss lenses always seems to be just amazing, true to life, not overly saturated. I know the Nikkor offers autofocus, but who cares when one concentrates on a still image, I actually prefer manual focus. I have an old d Nikkor 24 2.8 to carry around, small, compact, sharp enough at f8 or 11 to work around town with, plenty sharp and better colors and contrast than the new ed glass flat images. But for serious photograghs, the Zeiss wide angles seem perfect. What is it you do not find appealing in them?

Are the ZF and ZF.2 Planar 50mm f1.4 of the same optical design?

@TheGreatLoco

Жыл бұрын

Yes, Zeiss changed the 50mm 1.4 optically for the Milvus line.

I have the classics ZF.2’s 2/25, 1.4/50, 2/100 and 2/135. Was thinking about the classics 1.4/85, 1.4/35 and 2.8/15. I enjoy using those lenses and they have fine optical quality. I also use the Voigt APO 125mm 2.5 Macro SL. Was thinking about the APO 90mm 2.8 and 58mm 1.4, but one is rather slow and the other very similar to the classic 1.4/50.

@Kylegreigwalker

6 ай бұрын

Yeah I was thinking about the Voigtlander 90mm f2.8 but I can't find many reviews or pictures on flickr

Ken, quick question, i'm always bothering you with these sort of questions. Sigma 35-70 f/2.8-f/4 mf lens for about 40 bucks shipped. Good Deal?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Domenic Quarato for $40 you cant go wrong, not even with a nasty sigma :) IF it works that is

@MrDomq22

8 жыл бұрын

Words from the man him self. I'm going for it, for 40 bucks, it's worth a shot. Thanks!

Can you do a review of some of the otus lenses please?

@kathodosdotcom

7 жыл бұрын

i have, they SUCK AZZ, theyre only sharp, and sharpness is not everything, unless someone is an idiot who does think it is

@Bredddi

7 жыл бұрын

Theoria Apophasis I enjoy lots of your videos and have gained insight from them, thanks for all you do and most specifically for your presentation style. I still laugh at the gear sniffing video. Before your videos, I didn't know about and how to identify micro contrast - I earned a degree in photography and it was never covered :( so you're the man for helping me take my understanding of the dark art to a new level! I was turning into one of those stuffy shirt and tie wedding photographers and realized while watching your videos to just be myself when working with clients, I stopped covering up my body art and and decided not to be ashamed of being a gear head, I realized that it doesn't make me any less of an artist to want awesome gear as long as it truly is awesome and it's not just for appearances. Cheers mate thanks for the liberation!

any thoughts on the zeiss 50mm f2 Planar?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Maverick Yabut yeah, no way, it doesnt impress for nearly twice the price and F2 no less. Zeiss is smoking crack on that lens.

@loupbab3132

3 жыл бұрын

You don’t know anything if you say the zeiss Makro planar is bad. It is the best lens I’ve ever own. So beautiful, incredible 3D rendering, color rendering and outstanding sharpness even wide open. It’s so versatile too as it is a macro lens with a 50mm focal length (you can get nice compression when shooting close to your subject). You are way way off on that one

How do these stack up against modern lenses? I confess I have the Distagon 2.8/21, Distagon 2/35 and Planar 1.4/85.

@jharrelphoto

5 ай бұрын

The lenses you have are in a league of their own imo. Amazing character, color rendition. I’ve used the 20mm f1.8g he mentioned and yes it is great but I like the 21mm distagon more. It really depends though. If you prefer sunstars for landscape then the Nikon 20mm. But I love the flare on the zeiss 21mm. It looks way more natural to me.

@Bernard-ux2eb

5 ай бұрын

@@jharrelphoto They're all leftovers from my Pentax days, the 21mm being a Leitax converted mount. I tested all the lenses including the three Pentax FA Limiteds (31, 43 and 77) and D-FA* 70-200, 15-30 and so on and the Zeiss won hands down, so they remained and all the Pentax gear was sold off. I attach them to an A7RIII (an underwhelming experience, but awesome sensor) via a Rayqual adapter and they shine. Added a Carl Zeiss Contax Sonnar 2.8/135 for small money and a remarkable lens, a TTArtisan 1.4/50 ASPH in E-mount. It's 99% like a Leica Summilux but for pennies. Truth be told, the TTArtisan brings me the most joy (for the£109 as new, open box deal).

Different focal lengths aside, Zeiss 50mm 1.4 vs Voigtlander 58mm SL II 1.4 ? I can only do one. Best bang for the buck over most circumstances. thanks

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+charlatan19 most circumstances???? the Voigt 58mm can be had for mint used $400 or less, the Voight

@charlatan19

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis My needs aren't at the extremes, praying you'd say that. Thanks guy

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

there isnt even 1% quality difference between Voigtlander and Zeiss not even 1 Fing % winks*

oh have you checked out polarr.co/lens yet? they only have on comparison up so far but the zeiss 50mm 1.4 looks real soft.

ATG says to buy fine manual lenses, get ATG, Nikon AI, Samyang or Voigtlander lenses.

Hi AP, I just used the 100mm zeiss today . Bought on your recommendation. Did some portraits, first time I've taken pictures in ages!!.. WoW!!.. amazing !! I've found a new lease of life for photography, God , I hope it's not going to cost me too much money, Jeez this lens makes you feel like you can compete with the big boys!!

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+David C Haaaaaaa, that lens sure is "cheap" isnt it (NOOOT) Hahhahahaha.

I really am interested in buying the 35mm Zeiss. But I'm confused where to buy it because their is so many different prices, and places to get it. Any suggestions ?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Cole Baur ebay Japan, some other places.....WHICH zeiss?

@colebaur9602

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/2.0 ZF.2

@justinbassan

8 жыл бұрын

+Cole Baur I have this lense and I got it from Amazon. It's the best lense I've ever used yet. I use it when travelling and it's so sharp. It's just getting use to using manual focus.

What is it with the 50 1.8...so good.. so sharp.. so cheap...I don't own one but maybe ......i should...I have the 1.4...misty at 1.4...(which can be a good effect actually sometimes) ...great after F2......seems the factory have nailed it......should i buy one?considering i have the 1.4?

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+David Walton should you snag a 1.4 Zeiss planar? its not cheap, but its worth it

@davidwalton40

8 жыл бұрын

Yannick Khong That's a must buy then...thanks fella...don't tell the wife

@davidwalton40

8 жыл бұрын

+Yannick Khong ok can sill drink beer as well Result

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

wait till you see my next video uploading, RIOT!!!!!!!!!!!

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

Yannick Khong wait till you see my next video uploading, RIOT!!!!!!!!!!!

Love Your videos 👌 already sent You some donation 😉✌️

how about trying those Samyang lenses, they are quite afordable...

Pervert in a sex toy factory!! EPIC hahah.... Want to grab the 35mm Zeiss next, loving my 50mm. Did some street photography yesterday and I picked up the rocker technique within a couple minutes (thanks to your other vid). Easy peasy and great look to the images. WOW.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Mike S (bsodmike) Taaa Daaaaaaa :)

@Loganberriez79

8 жыл бұрын

Yup body sway focus or feet focus technique

@Loganberriez79

8 жыл бұрын

Yup body sway focus or feet focus technique

The Nikon 135 spanks the Zeiss? I’ve got the zeiss but can’t see how it’s possible Nikon could best it.

@leroy5007

5 жыл бұрын

I take it you're thoroughly impressed with your 135 mm Zeiss?

@dhexistentialist5215

5 жыл бұрын

@@leroy5007 I wouldn't swap it for the Nikon put it that way. I have the Milvus version rather than the previous gen though.

Sometimes you can find 15mm distagon in mint condition in China for 1000-1200 USD, but today I saw whole Internet and just 1 seller has 1pc, for Canon mount. 15mm Distagon is very rare lens.

@carbon6372

4 жыл бұрын

I found the Milvus version for about $1300. Not sure if I want it, as there are mixed reviews about it being pretty soft in the corners, and there generally aren’t many reviews about it. There are probably better options, but I just like look of the lens, feel and look of the images. This might sound like a weird combination, but I will use it on my Sony a7R IV. I would love to just stick to a DSLR with it, but it’s harder to manual focus and Canons generally have lower dynamic range. For my use, I want better dynamic range. I don’t like Nikon lenses or the aperture rings for Zeiss lenses on Nikon, so I would never go that road. But if I could live with the dynamic range of the Canon 5DSR or 5D Mark IV and find a way to focus properly at most times without changing the prism, I might just go back to DSLRs. Just love some of the Zeiss lenses and also a lot of Canon lenses. I also care a lot about how the setup looks, and it would look stupid to log around with an adapter and Zeiss lenses on Sony.

Ken, I wish I could afford them all, but I can not. I have ordered new the Zeiss ZF2 35 and 50. (I have also the 58 Nokton Voigtlander and Nikon 20 f.1.8). My question is, IS THERE ANY SPECIALLY GOOD FOR MIDRANGE ZOOM lens FROM Zeiss? And now , the most important part. After all these divine lenses, I WILL FORCE myself TO LEARN MANUAL. I am looking forward. Hope you support my decisions. I love excellence and quality and do not mind about learning effort.

Digitalrev reviewed the new Zeiss lens, Ki seems happy. He is usually on the mark with his reviews.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+John Valatos Ki is an idiot. Nah, hes not. :P

@johnvalatos4073

8 жыл бұрын

Hehehe, you made me laugh. He loves playing with lens though, like they were his you know what.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

i know, hes funny too , hes like the 3 stooges of photography

Seems like a lot of Zeiss hate going on.

+Theoria Apophasis The 15mm ZF.2 is made in Japan, not Germany. Only the 15mm ZM is being made in Germany.

I'd like to hear you reasoning for dissing the 21mm Distagon, a lens that is widely accepted as one of the finest wide angle lenses ever made...

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+bollusc because it SUCKS ASS. widely accepted? not a chance!!! ROFL I know of at least 20 lens gods that admit it blows......in fact the Nikkor 20mm 1.8G is the ONLY Nikkor lens to blow the hell out of Zeiss (their 21mm). ive owned almost all the Zeiss lenses, and used them all.......the 21mm sucks donkey nuggets :)

@aLittlePal

2 жыл бұрын

@@kathodosdotcom reasoning?

Having tried some of these lenses. All I can say is that these need to be kept away from children.

But they are Zeiss. The name is worth something?

You said Zeiss 135 Apo was a loser?

@kathodosdotcom

7 жыл бұрын

relative to............ its a great lens, overpriced, bad value, better exists from Nikon on 135mm f2 DC

@YasserSultan

7 жыл бұрын

It's the only lens I regretted selling. It's amazing, extremely sharp, no CA, great colors. I couldn't live without for more than 4 months, so I bought another one :) ... Used for 1k... not bad at all.

you cant do review without pictures

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

says who.

@Dune00z

8 жыл бұрын

Even the pictures I have seen on review videos showing how great or poor something can be manipulated or taken poorly or are tested in impractical ways. The reviews provided by TAP are unlike the others you see because you either trust him and try it yourself, or you don't, which is why I enjoy these reviews and opinions more than any other. If you need samples, google it or rent it. Trying it yourself is really the only way to know if it works for you.

this is the dreamy case!!

get a canon so you can compare canon lenses to nikon and zeiss.

@kathodosdotcom

8 жыл бұрын

+Ryan Daugherty ive owned canon, their glass blows :P

@Loganberriez79

8 жыл бұрын

+Theoria Apophasis funny, a lot of people on KZread tout that canon glass is superior to nikons. They're all on crack

@rydaug79

8 жыл бұрын

Some of Canon's lenses are better

@backfilms1953

Жыл бұрын

@@rydaug79 🤣🤣🤭 never seen one good canon lens

@paulhenry7

Ай бұрын

@@backfilms1953 Ever tried the FD 135mm f2? Or the EF 28-80mm f2.8-4 L (mini-magic drainpipe)?