What about Muslim brutes from Turk & Ottoman Empire conquering & destroying Hindus in India for centuries?

@KP-bc2wt

15 күн бұрын

and Bhedings kllngs of non blivers in africa...the list goes on

@musirikrishnaswamy7670

15 күн бұрын

Islam brutalized India much, much more than British ever did.

@GabbarSeTakkar

14 күн бұрын

No Turkish invaded India. You need a history lesson. It was people from Persia which is a different country altogether.

@musirikrishnaswamy7670

13 күн бұрын

@@GabbarSeTakkar I definitely don’t need lessons from you on Indias history, which is as much mine too.. Our old scriptures from lord Ranganadhaswaky temple, speaks of ‘thulukkas’ (Turks) who invaded south. Go learn more before you talk..

@handsomemonkeyking5299

12 күн бұрын

⁠​⁠​⁠@@GabbarSeTakkar ouch crash and burn.. you were way to confident for someone who never even checked the history books. How childish and irresponsible. You need to do better.

Britain did colonise other countries... But name one country that isn't doing better now than their neighbours due to the laws and ideas that Britain brought to those countries.... Why do people love to bring up the history of Europe, but fail to look at the things their own countries have done...

@thugmonk9837

16 күн бұрын

Omg! 🤦🏾‍♂️ this is what happens when you're not intelligent enough to question the things we're taught in school or the things we read in history books. You set the countries you colonised back hundreds of years. India was one of the richest countries on earth before the British looted everything, caused famines and killled tens of millions. Now you want to say you did them a favour? They still haven't recovered fully from what your ancestors did. So do your research before you say such foolish and insulting things.

@ber2a

15 күн бұрын

💕🇸🇬 S'pore salutes Britain 🇬🇧💕

@leevan2332

15 күн бұрын

Yes look at the turmoil Hong Kong is in now after being handed back to China!!

@sharonhyde7735

15 күн бұрын

Alexander the great, Attlia the Hunt, Vikings, Romans ect they harp on about the past! Most of us ancestors were working class and just had to put up and shut up in them days! But not so much now thanks to you! 😊

@GabbarSeTakkar

14 күн бұрын

Pakistan?

What about the Ottomans who conquered more of the world than the British empire ever did! And the Ottomans took many slaves, including white Europeans.

@bconni2

15 күн бұрын

that's not true. the British empire was much bigger. but i get your point, anyway.

@kevinadamson5768

15 күн бұрын

The British empire was the biggest one ever. 😊

@ApostleOfZeus199

15 күн бұрын

​@@kevinadamson5768But the Muslim sl@ve trade was much bigger and lasted way longer.

@sabrewolf4129

15 күн бұрын

@@bconni2 It is true. Where do you think the word SLAVE comes from? Slav, they where WHITE people

@kevinadamson5768

15 күн бұрын

@@ApostleOfZeus199 they are still doing it today in some parts.

Arabs and Berbers held Portugal from the 8th century to the 14th century. Arabs and Berbers conquered Spain in the 8th century and were finally expelled in 1492. The Ottoman Turks conquered and held the Balkans for 400 years. The border between the Archdukes of Austria and the Ottoman Sultans was 50 miles south of Vienna for over a hundred years, The conquered and held Sicily for two hundred years. Cyprus and Crete for 400 years. The Crimea for 300 years. The Algerian pirates raided the shores of Christian Europe, all the way into the English Channel and across the Atlantic for 350 years. The Arab Jihad conquered and forcibly converted through the sword and social, political and economic oppression areas which had been Christian for over 300 years. Egypt, Libya, North Africa, Judea, Syria, Asia Minor were all part of the Roman Empire. Syria, Judea and Palestine became a battleground between the Arabs, Kurds and other Muslims and the Christian Eastern Roman Empire from 625-1097 CE. The Sassanid Persians, who had been fighting Rome for 400 years was driven under by the Great Jihad in a hundred years. The Crusaders were COUNTER-OFFENSIVES by Christian Europeans to recover these lost lands after the Eastern Roman Empire lost them for good with the Battle of Manzikert in 1097. The Crusades lasted less than 300 years. The death of the Caliphates in Baghdad and elsewhere in the Middle East and the destruction of the Arab world wasn't due to the Crusaders who never got closer than 500 miles to the city. It was the Mongols and Tamerlane that destroyed the cities, villages and irrigation systems of Iraq. The occupation of Algeria by the French in the 19th century was a reaction to the Algerian pirates and their raids and selling French, Italians, Spaniards, Portuguese captives into slavery when they couldn't be ransomed. The French occupied Lebanon and Syria in 1921 and left by 1949. The British occupied Egypt in 1888 and left by 1951. Palestine in 1921 and left by 1948. Iraq in 1921 and gone by 1954. Italy occupied Libya in 1912 and left by 1945. The heart of Islam was never occupied by the Europeans. The idea that Christian Europeans somehow conquered and held areas of the Middle East which were originally Muslim is flawed, because except for Saudi Arabia and the coastal enclaves on the Red Sea, Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf, the lands the Europeans occupied had been themselves conquered and occupied by Muslims, lands that had been part of a Christian Roman Empire.

@chantellelowe2168

10 күн бұрын

Great breakdown of world history thanks I have been trying to learn more 😊 so I can understand the many arguments today..

@franciscoqme3420

10 күн бұрын

In Spain we have a saying, "there are moros* on the coast" (Hay moros en la costa), which means that you have to be prudent and cautious in the face of more than certain danger, or this other one, "There are no moros* on the coast" (No hay moros en la costa), which means the opposite, there are no dangers in sight. Both sayings are the result of the innumerable Berber raids that the Spanish coasts suffered for centuries at the hands of the Berber and Muslim pirates of North Africa in order to capture the Spaniards of that time to sell them as slaves in North Africa. The Muslims for centuries were magnificent slave traders, until the Europeans banned slavery in the 19th century. The author of Don Quixote himself, D. Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, was a slave in Algiers for five years until his family, with financial help from friars, could pay for his release, they had to pay 500 escudos of Spanish gold. Piracy was supported by the Ottomans. *Moro or moros in plural is a person who professes the islamic religión.

@Lestibournes

10 күн бұрын

"Judea and Palestine" - Palestine is the Roman misnomer for Judea.

@koutetsusama2498

10 күн бұрын

Man, knowledge right there. Empires rise and fall, for many reasons. Just think if we had more records from ancient Persia and Greece. There's always atrocities, and civilizations have always had to deal with it, and move on.

@TheFredmac

9 күн бұрын

​@@franciscoqme3420your comment is very interesting. The great lakes in North America are connected to the Atlantic Ocean. Because of this there are Ocean going ships that dock in Detroit. Part of Detroit has a large Muslim population. I live 4 hours away from Detroit but I understand the feeling behind "Hay moros en la costa". I recently learned of Saint James the Great, it's an inspirational story.

Every comment I've made asking Palestine supporters to condemn Hamas terrorists over the past 7 months has been met with fierce pushback; they defend rather than condemn.

@jerrebrasfield4231

15 күн бұрын

You should point out that there is no such thing as palistine. The original nation was destroyed by its neighbors, taken over by Egypt, and then was given to the jewish people after ww2. All that with the fact the land belonged to the jewish people before palistine even existed.

@Ilforever1124

15 күн бұрын

@@jerrebrasfield4231 True

@Hellndegenerates

15 күн бұрын

Hamas are just a fake group created by Israel, Hamas don't exist as a fighting force.

@sharonhyde7735

15 күн бұрын

Thank you for explaining!

@georgeprchal3924

14 күн бұрын

You should point out that even if Israel vanished the Jordanians and Egyptians would just take the land back.

Once again, Douglas Murry gives true historical fact.

Middle Eastern colonizer: 🥰 European colonizer: 🤬

@ZONE-fj8ly

13 күн бұрын

Name me one Middle East military force that is invading and occupying a Western country?

A pope in the 1400’s had the correct answer he tried 4 times to excise Islam. Too bad he was unsuccessful.

It's about time the British🇬🇧 stopped the guilt trips they were put through in the name of colonisation It has weakened them and they have become a soft target for immigrants all in the name of colonisation

As a Turk I totally agree with Murray

@lisbetsoda4874

3 күн бұрын

Thank you

People from the Middle East and Africa run to Europe and the UK, because things work in these countries. Then instead of emulating the culture of the West, they bring in their values and soon the once thriving communities are overwhelmed and slide downwards. It is as if the immigranrs are not capable of upliftment and progress but just indolence and turpitude. Similar trends in the USA and Australia and New Zealand. It is also a fact that countries in Africa clonised by Europeans, in general are worse off than under Colonial rule. Only in Southern and Eastern Asia are there countries that are progressing into shining examples of real growth.

Douglas Murray is awesome the best

Turkish empire was a complete horror show as can be worked out simply by looking at Turkey today.

@wiseonwords

10 күн бұрын

And then there's the Islamic Empire - expanded by aggressive war.

The woman who spoke against the motion also claimed that the European colonial powers stole the wealth of their colonies. That is technically correct, in that European imperialists did steal things from the foreign countries they ruled, but so incomplete that it is really false, for the simple reason that, on balance, the European overseas empires transferred wealth from Europe to the overseas empires, considerably more wealth than they took out. And this is easy to prove: when Britain, the biggest of the European imperial powers, was broke and desperate for cash after World War Two, what did they do? Liquidated the empire. If the empire had been a source of wealth for Britain, that would have made no sense: why give up the empire when you most need it. But it makes perfect sense if, as was the case, the empire was a drain on its resources that Britain could no longer afford. But also, consider that the European imperial powers were building railroads, bridges, paved roads, modern port facilities, telecommunications, factories, mines, and other modern facilities throughout their overseas empires. That was enormous transfer of wealth to the empires from Europe.

@johnmontoya8160

10 күн бұрын

Good points. Very balanced and nuanced.

@redrackham6812

9 күн бұрын

@@johnmontoya8160 Thank you.

@mikolajtrzeciecki1188

9 күн бұрын

If those nations were so rich and magnificent, why it is that poor and nasty Europeans could conquer them and enrich themselves?

@helgaioannidis9365

7 күн бұрын

It's also interesting to see in what state European countries were after the Ottomans left their territory. The Ottomans left hardly any infrastructure or industry in the countries they had colonised. Not to mention the genocide the Turks committed against Armenians and Greeks and how they're treating the Kurds even today.

@getlost3346

2 күн бұрын

What wealth? And from who? There was never any details to this.

Can we talk about what the Turks did, since we’re talking about others crimes.

@godssara6758

15 күн бұрын

How much time do you have?

@georgekustner3440

15 күн бұрын

The Albanian genocide

@rogerdodger8813

14 күн бұрын

And still deny the Armenian genocide.

@TheSicarius92

11 күн бұрын

Oh you mean the traitors who abandoned their religion and oppressed their former christian brothers at the behest of an alien invader? ​@georgekustner3440

@maryalex1401

11 күн бұрын

We will stay here for ever.

These guys are the original slavers of Europe and Africa.... For thousands of years the silk corridor was also the slave corridor... long before Europe became what it is. Long before the Roman Empire they were already at it. Even today, if you know where to look, the slave markets still exist.

@TheFredmac

9 күн бұрын

There are more slaves today than at any point in history. I don't have a source just something I keep hearing.

Just walking around my town today it's blindingly obvious that it isn't my hometown any more....& I'm old enough to have seen the difference.

My god people need to stop being victims when they themselves are not

Muslim claim their religion is holy. Talk and act only. Where the prove of holiness. Holiness means: not creating trouble, racist rebellious. Holiness : real humbleness.

@earlymorningtwilight9119

14 күн бұрын

holy trash

@johnmontoya8160

10 күн бұрын

When Muhammad died his last words were to kill atheists, Jews, and Christians. Jesus' last words were, "forgive them father, for they don't know what they do." Which one sounds more loving?

Europe was staggeringly wealthy compared to the rest of the world going back to the time of Rome. When Europe went a colonizing they found the majority of the world’s population living in the dark ages and having lived that way since the beginning of history. All modern technologies come from Europe. And the Europeans brought their wealth and technology to the world, not the other way around.

@de22bock

10 күн бұрын

You must not be aware of Chinese history.

@RunFromCities

10 күн бұрын

​@@de22bock civil war, civil war, brutal dynasty changes, technology and knowledge but no real will to use it to full capacity beyond the aristocracy.

@TheFredmac

9 күн бұрын

​@@RunFromCitiesso China today is pretty much the same as China of the past.

@Steven9567

6 күн бұрын

you mean exploring settling and conquest

Thanks for presenting Luminous Douglas Murray , I love his veracity.

The problem isn't so much immigration as much as it is that said immigrants refuse to assimilate but expect the host nation to do so. That equation equal trouble

Ovet a century ago a British merchant came to my slice of Borneo and defeated the local pirate warlords at the behest of the Muslim Brunei kingd. He was given the whole region and became the first fo the 3 White Rajahs. The Rajahs let in Christian missionaries and slowly the pagan worshiping portions of the country converted. Over a decade ago the Muslim federal government was going through waves of internal religious "enlightenments" as numerous young policy makers were returning from their studies in places like Pakistan and the Arab countries. They didn't like my state's Christian-majority population so they started sending their Muslim teachers under the guise of filling in the severe lack of teachers. Initially, they sent a couple of hundreds per year. Then, one day they declared that they will start sending in tens of thousands of their teachers to "help" us every year. We, local Muslims and non-Muslims alike, saw the scam right away and rejected their proposal.

They very carefully selcted and implant the word colonialism in to the young peoples mind.

@PGHEngineer

6 күн бұрын

Only Australia, New Zealand and the Americas were ever colonised. It has precious little to do with Islam.

European colonies thrived. American colonies thrived. The issue appeared when leftists began to subvert the accomplissements of Europeans and Americans.

At the risk of sounding frivolous, is there such a thing as “joie de vivre” in Muslim society?. Anyone?

@mikolajtrzeciecki1188

9 күн бұрын

At the risk of sounding frivolous, is there such a thing as “joie de vivre” in a Calvinist society?.

@Kitsunekone

6 күн бұрын

@@mikolajtrzeciecki1188 Which is exactly why America separated itself from religion. That the church doesn't hold power politically, and its citizens run on religious freedom so that they may choose to follow whatever religion they'd like so long as it doesn't infringe upon the rights of others.

Almost every country the UK colonised is better off today than had we not colonised them, or. has had the opportunity to be much better off, but has fallen back to their own corrupt ways to ruin the structure we built up during our colonialisation. By structure, I mean the rule of law, democracy, equal rights, freedom, industry, trade, railways, etc. etc. Some are like ungrateful children who have left home and are constantly moaning because they found the World is not the benevolent place their home used to be.

@Steven9567

6 күн бұрын

drop the , democracy part , democracy doesn't make a nation good look at current day europe

The Ottomans had a monopoly on trade from Mumbai to Europe and Britain. This started the drive to find India. A positive effect was colonization of Africa and Americas. The financial collapse of the Ottomans in 1920 is the root cause of the decline of Islam and strife in middle east

@slapdashdumper

10 күн бұрын

just think - if it wasn't for discovery, drilling, refinaries, export tax payments by Europeans and then the stealing of the oil plants by muslim countries where would the Middle East be today ? well the Sphynx would STILL be buried up to it's neck in it for a start.

Well said sir 🫶🙏

Murray❤ 👏🏽

GOOD ON YOU MATE!!!

Somehow I don't think Islam spread thru the middle east, North Africa, Eastern Europe and Spain with a gentle knock on the door!

And why we never talk about happenings after 7th century? What would have happened to the rest of the world if Europeans managed to keep their intentions to themselves?

@Briselance

10 күн бұрын

What would have happened? Well, that is a most-interesting starting point for a uchronia.

@vilastamhane2219

9 күн бұрын

@@Briselance I made a serious mistake. The word is INVENTIONS and not INTENTIONS. Now we can talk.

Knowledge is power

I really like this young man's presentation. Remember, he's speaking in a language that is not his own. Outstanding. I'm going to be following his other you tube videos for sure! My ear will get used to his accent and it will become easier to understand everything.

Diversity is good but apply buy the rules.. i drive on the left other countries drive on the right.. if we don't obey the rules what is the point in left and right

Ultimately, it boils down to this: in today's world, those who criticize colonialism are often the descendants of those who engaged in it and, to use a common phrase, have lost. No longer able to take what they want, they now request reparations and concessions that have been previously granted and utilized. We have been addressing the consequences of colonialism for centuries. Moreover, we continue to aid many of the same nations that now express dissatisfaction and demand more. In most instances, these countries have prospered more from our involvement than they had prior. It is also notable that many critics of the West have worse records on human rights and infrastructure due to their own shortcomings. These nations are often embroiled in conflict and violence, which they attribute to the West, despite a history of internal and external strife. It is somewhat ironic that while they criticize the West, they also aspire to partake in and benefit from the advancements it has fostered, which is both laughable and pathetic.

Colonialism was good and the benefits of being colonized by the British Empire far outweighed the negatives. You can thank the Empire for ending slavery in Africa and for ending the custom of burning widows in India.

And, of course, what about the Roman Empire? Nobody is suggesting Italy pay reparations for her previous crimes. Like Douglas pointed out, almost every race has had its turn at colonizing, and all are guilty of crimes. That was in the past. You can't hold current generations responsible for the sins of their ancestors. Oh, and one final point, which very few reparations protagonists mention. Who finally abolished slavery, on a global scale? Yup, the British Empire, at massvie cost to themselves, with thousands of Royal Navy sailors dying in battles with slavers of nations not yet willing to end their abominable trade.

Lets start a discussion about the Ottoman empire!

The Reason European countries are 'punished' for their histories is because they have money. It is argued that the Europeans are wealthy because they stole money. Maybe that is how poor countries work but European countries made wealth with new farming and industry.

@PGHEngineer

6 күн бұрын

The East India Company was about as big as BP is today, and it went bankrupt. I'm struggling to see how there was much money made in the whole of the sub-continent by imperialism.

@stephenskinner3851

6 күн бұрын

@@PGHEngineer Once the steam engine appeared it was game over for traditional empire models - control of a commodity or two and using force (horses and men) to expand and defend. The Newcomen engine was 20hp. Following that Watt's early engines were 200hp. Each subsequent improvement by whoever increased horse power while the numbers made increased exponentially. It is better to understand wealth by how much horse power a nation can generate and in the case of Great Britain we quickly surpassed all previous empires combined - we were then surpassed by others that were able to copy our production methods and so create wealth. We still measure engines using horse power. Dangerously the eco-zealots are working very hard to end modern farming and the deliberate production of power.

@PGHEngineer

6 күн бұрын

@stephenskinner3851 I entirely agree with you. Increased wealth is a product of increased production. A 200hp engine is considerably more productive than a man generating less than 0.2hp.

Murray good good

Muslim slave traders made hay in East Africa, while the Europeans plied the slave trade in West Africa.

@slapdashdumper

10 күн бұрын

Mali and Mauritania is pretty much West Africa

@briannobin5437

10 күн бұрын

@@slapdashdumper But you got the drift.

Remember, Barbary slavery was already a thing before Europeans set foot on any exploration boats that colonized other countries. And besides, even if Europeans made some bad decisions, does that mean that muslims now can make the same mistakes? Did they learn nothing from history?

When native pepole have to change there customs to match the new pepole

There is plenty of blame to go around. Let's grow up and try to be good people from now on.

If any Muslim speaks such a way, it will be treated as hate speak.

Good man.

That is why the morals and culture of America is like a sinking ship.

I for one am happy that my country (Italy) has been spared from this nonsense, every country engaged in slavery, colonialism and a thousand more horrible crimes throughout history, it doesn't mean that we have to pay for it hundreds of years later, especially when the hypocrates who are asking this are absolutely not better than us, muslims in particular absolutely need to be put in their place when it comes to conversations such as this by reminding them of all the crap their countries did in the past and what they continue to do to this day.

I didn't see a Muslim scholar, I saw a Greek guy asking a question. Apart from that, well done.

I read the comments and I have to say I am very impressed by everybody's historical knowledge........knowledge being something the "other side" continues to ignore.

If one group of people are going to be "punished" for the past of the country, it is onlu fair to call out every country / group of peple who did the same / similar. Otherwise a similar debate could be having 1 white, 1 black 1 Arab 1 Asian, all commit a crime that results in the loss of many lives. BUT only the white bloke is put before a court, the others being let off. This is where the "blind" justice should come in, do not look at colour, race, religion etc only look at the who, why, when...

@slapdashdumper

10 күн бұрын

Lefties always have trouble with all native american indian tribes owning slaves, doesn't fit the narrative too well

Past wrongs are always getting in the way of social progress! All countries have done wrong in the past...why harp on the wrongs when the future begs for clarity...

Thank You 👍🏾❤🌿🌹🌿❤

The Greek guy who asked the question "why are you worried about one or two or even a thousand people who want to live here> Well his math's were out by more than seventy Million. yes. 70 million and climbing. Wake up Europe .

We have to engage in colonization to get even for past colonization. - The stupid mindset of the girl question asker.

EVERY ABSURDITY HAS A CHAMPION TO DEFEND IT THERE,S SMALL CHOICE IN ROTTEN APPLES

I agree. & what's funny is that the people who push for more diversity in Eurocentric nations would be appalled and scream racism if Europeans were still invading and dominating other countries and their cultures. But it's perfectly fine to them to have that done to European countries. Hypocrisy never births good things.

Long winded questions.

2:35 If Greek people feel that they should pay for the sins of colonialism, let them. We people of Central Europe didn't colonialize anybody and do not feel compelled to pay for the presumable sins of Westerners.

The facts appear to have eluded many of these students thoughts surrounding slavery, it’s been around forever and would seem that the emphasis is on the African continent, it was recognised that there were long standing events of kidnapping within the tribal groups throughout their communities and enslaving them, you really need to educate yourself in these issues.

She’s right about the EU being a colonial power.I’ve never made that connection before, yet it’s so obvious.

@michaelsnyder3871

12 күн бұрын

BS. A colonial power has military, economic and political power over lands not originally held at any time in history by the people who have created this colonial power. The EU is primarily an economic bloc that is loosely politically aligned. Unlike the Chinese, Russians, and several other nations, the EU has no occupation forces anywhere in the world. The EU has never invaded a neighbor for economic and political gain. Not like China and Tibet, Inner Mongolia and Manchuria. Or Russia and the Crimea or the Caucasus or Ukraine. And don't blabber about the US. The US has not added to its core territories since 1898 while granting independence to the Philippines and mandated islands originally occupied by Japan. US troops are stationed in a number of countries at the INVITATION of the host country's government or because such a government doesn't exist to exercise national sovereignty over territory being used by non-state actors engaged in anti-Western terrorism, like the Algerian pirates.

@nonope1715

11 күн бұрын

Absorbs states regardless of the will of their electorate & rules with unelected elite? The lack of an armed force is not due to lack of trying, one of the issues people have with the EU is the European army being formed, at least one attempt to form it made the news a few years back.

@rup54

11 күн бұрын

Britain isn't a member of the EU.

I’m for inclusion but there is a limit ! When you can’t recognize your own neighborhood that is past the limit !!!

Islam dies without lies!

I would like you to migrate to Sweden then we would have at least one person with sensible views on migration

No one here of the Ottoman Empire? No colonialism there?

Is there a country on Earth that wasn't created through violence of some sort? Pick any country in the world and examine its origins. I love how people take a snapshot in time that favors their own narrative.

@musirikrishnaswamy7670

2 күн бұрын

India.India was never violent. Never created thro violence. Even today India is non violent.

@Tampahop

2 күн бұрын

@@musirikrishnaswamy7670 You are kidding, right? Early history started with tribal units that grew into warring empires and dynasties. Turks, Muslims, and Mongols all had their shots at what is now India as well, so please don't tell me India was built without violence. What about Pakistan? Was the British rule of India peaceful? Honestly, it only took a few minutes on Wikipedia to prove you wrong.

@musirikrishnaswamy7670

2 күн бұрын

@@Tampahop yes in India violence was started thro both British Christians & Islamic Mughals aka Turks Mangoks etc. Not by Hindus never by Hindus.

Very true!

Young man, you make a lot of great points.

Almost like every place ever has invaded or been invaded

What angry Muslim,didn't see one

WEF. stop supporting it.

I generally agree with Douglas Murray, but he relies on rhetoric a bit too much. Like his question "Why is it European colonialism that people are against and not Turkish colonialism?" It's pretty obvious, that the reason is that European empire/colonialism, namely Protestant Chirstianity, is the foundation of the existing world order, and international law, and it's that order that people want to topple. Can't have a global caliphate if the foundation of the law globally remains Chirstian. It's also the case that these anti-European arguments are made by nations with over population issues that want to spread into the territories of Europeans and their descendants, so it's convienent to use colonialism as a means to shut down any vocalized opposition to such an agenda. Why is one or two people threatening? How many missionaries were sent into various nations and tribal people? One? Two? And now we have billions of people who follow from the changes those one or two people made. Any number of people is threatening when the intention of those people is to subvert, assimilate, dominate, and augment the group that they've entered into. One well placed bad actor can make all the difference.

What about the Arabs from the Arabian peninsula who's colonialism and slavery literally caused the creation of an entire language, still spoken, along the length of the East Africa coast, swahili.

Brilliant from Murray as always...but please mr youtuber your commentary lacks depth and understanding. Its not about allowing vast numbers in your country which in itself is a problem but looking for cultural similarity and not a pluralistic society. You should identify key shared fundamental principles of the people coming in.

The reason countries and borders exist in the first place is because of our differences. We've spent centuries sorting ourselves out so similar peoples can live together. If we all thought alike and had the same values, fair enough, countries without borders could work, but just look at the internet, it proves we can't even co-exist with people of different opinions. Start trying to mix us up and we'll just sort into culturally similar groups again, probably by fighting.

He’s just great !

YOU SHOULD ONLY ALLOW IMMIGRANTS TO COME IN WHO WANT TO JOIN YOUR CULTURE. YOU SHOULD NOT ALLOW THOSE WHO WANT TO BRING THEIR CULTURE AND IMPOSE THEIR DIFFERENT CULTURE ON THE CITIZENS THAT ARE ALREADY THERE.

Islam was on a crusade from Arabia (~700) through to Spain and Austria where they were turned back in the 1500s and 1600s. A sense of history is required, not convenient post modernism.

I love the mind of Douglas Murray!

India colonized southeast Asian countries for centuries. Korea, Japan, China all colonized and conquered. Thailand right now holds land that it colonized from the Khmer and Bagan empires. Is someone demanding Thailand to give those lands back?

Invaded because of the barbary pirates

Imagine being God and watching all this insanity for decade after decade

02:36 "They were exploited, so we cannot say now that we don't accept them". Yes, we can. And we must. 🙂 Acceptance? On a case-by-case basis. Or small numbers. As any country would.

Havoc is already the norm in the West because of the aliens.

Serbia, Bosnia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Bulgaria, Romania, Albania, Greece and for a short(er) while Hungary, Moldova and Croatia were also "enjoying" Muslim rule 😂😂😂

well done Douglas, showing these idiots the truth

Where is original video?

That girls voice is hard to listen to 🙈😂

She’s incoherent.

That guy gets it’s

What about the arabs who conquered Africa, Asia and south europe and the balcans?

The reasons are simple, the west preach human rights, accountabilities, accepting and saying it's dark past out Loud and most important of all the are Rich!!! If poor there is no reason to demand don't you think.

Didn't allow Islamic conquest? What is wrong with that??

Islam was invented abt 1400 yrs ago and is an offshoot of Christianity. Christianity was formed abt 2024 years ago and is an offshoot of Judaism. Lots of religions have come and gone.

note: of the African nations that were once European colonies, those that adopted communism failed and those that adopted capitalism succeeded; the latter do not suffer one bit from their former state of colonialism (and so the condition of the former cannot either blame colonialism for their poor states).

Islam stay in the middle east. Such a wonderful religion that helps nations grow. Just look at Iran. Great place to live for my Islam lovers.

Basic British common law has lifted the chains of many peoples. Remember they stopped slavery first. Not all colonial ideas are bad. Of course many countries were abused by colonial powers but just not European ones.

@Steven9567

6 күн бұрын

people really need to stop with the word colonial a colony is territory not attached to the main body of an country how it got that way doesn't matter a lot of lands call what it is conquest or settling if no one owned the land

Carpet bomb gaza