As a kid I used to spend all my summer and winter vacations in Ararat valley with my grand parents. To think that Noah and his family lived there when they first came down from the Ark😊 And there are still plenty of vineyards:)

@maryhinson3262

20 күн бұрын

Wow! ❤

@maryhinson3262

20 күн бұрын

🎉

Arkiologist. Dad joke alert.

@kellyhudspeth1736

2 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@telasmith2997

2 ай бұрын

😂🎉

@hrhtreeoflife4815

Ай бұрын

😂 ❤ good 👍 one

@natashamiller4860

Ай бұрын

Dad joke…for the WIN!! 🏆

@Thenoobestgirl

14 күн бұрын

But what's the point of putting the alert after the fact? 😭

I’ve been fascinated by Noah’s ark since becoming a Christian 54 years ago. I find the geology of the Grand Canyon very compelling evidence of Noah’s flood as there is little or no erosion on the top of each layer. If there were thousands or millions of years between each layer, it seems that there would be significant erosion. However, as the flood waters swept across the area and laid down sediment, there wasn’t time for erosion of each layer.

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

There never was a Global Flood. The bible is a pack of lies.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

How would you know the upper surfaces of various layers were eroded or not? Over eons of time tons of slow erosion could take place.

@76sherie

Ай бұрын

It can happen very fast! Mount St Helen’s pretty much destroyed the “millions of years of erosion to create it” theory 😊

@maylingng4107

Ай бұрын

@@76sherie That is not true. You are just repeating the lies of Steve Austin, a liar and a young earth creationist. The eruptive history of Mount St. Helens began about 40,000 years ago with dacitic volcanism, which continued intermittently until about 2,500 years ago.

@rickyweeks9144

Ай бұрын

​@@plainsmanThere were geological studies done on the Grand Canyon in 2017, completed in 2024, that released scientifically peer-reviewed papers confirming that these layers were deposited rapidly by flood waters and not by the process of billions of years. There is literally Zero scientific evidence confirming any life existing past 10,000 to 15,000 years ago.

I took part in an expedition to Mt Ararat in the early '70's. There have been several books (all probably out of print now) that have documented eye witness accounts of ark sightings dating back to the 1800's. The unrelated eyewitness accounts detailed in the various books all appear to describe the ark as still being intact and encased in ice, with small or large sections visible depending on seasonal temperature fluctuations that impact how much of the ice cap melts. Mt Ararat is somewhat unique in that it has a permanent ice cap down to an elevation of about 14,000 ft. This is significant because if the ark is there and inside the ice cap, this would help preserve it and not tear it apart over time like being inside of a moving glacier would. Our expedition initially focused on exploring the Ahora Gorge region of the mountain, since eyewitness accounts seem to have increased after the 1840 earthquake that greatly impacted that area (It destroyed a monastery at the base of the gorge which is where our base camp was). We speculated that maybe at the top of the gorge near the ice cap things might have changed with the earthquake exposing part of the ark. We concluded that the ark would have a low probability of surviving intact anywhere near the Ahora Gorge. We then shifted our search to another section of the mountain, but were eventually robbed at gunpoint by Kurd bandits at 12,500 ft, and lost all of our climbing equipment. That put an abrupt end to our expedition. My personal opinion is that the ark has been preserved by God for revealing at a time of his choosing. The discovery of Noah's Ark would certainly have the worldwide significance and impact discussed in this video by Drs McDowell and Kennedy..

@cecelialeroux4408

2 ай бұрын

Ron wyatt already found it

@hoganhogan3

2 ай бұрын

how did noah, his family and all those animals get off the mountain being three miles high?

@wsmc14

2 ай бұрын

@@hoganhogan3the unicorns flew them down

@Soonerking

2 ай бұрын

That was a faulty expedition.

@dougmartin9120

2 ай бұрын

I have a friend, an archaeologist, who 15 years ago showed me a video of her entering the ice-submerged structure there. The structure's configuration that I saw could have plausibly been from some kind of floating structure.

why is there no mention of Ron Wyatt and his possible find of the Ark?

@GatgerGaming

2 ай бұрын

Because Ron Wyatt is laughably spurious

@markmcflounder15

2 ай бұрын

Hello Leroy B. I have to agree with Gatger. Ron Wyatt is not trustworthy.

@NYC1025

2 ай бұрын

I wonder what about Ron Wyatt is not trustworthy?

@Oissst2012

2 ай бұрын

This channel is sus--picious ..I cannot believe these 2 is dismissing the Turkish governments archaeological findings, the scientific collaboration on u.s. labs and findings for strong evidence with r0n wy@tt .. this channel is a big sus--pect for me. be--ware of these 2.

@duncanfeyd4056

2 ай бұрын

Ron Wyatt is a proven fraud. He claimed he would reveal The Ark of The Covenant to the world and died without doing so. Scripture has a phrase for that: False Prophet.

This was really cool. I also enjoy watching Professor Kramer’s content. Seeing Biblical narratives and archaeology matching up is so fascinating.

@mirandahotspring4019

27 күн бұрын

Problem is they don't.

what about Ron Wyatt? He was pretty sure he found it in the 70s?

@klouis1886

2 ай бұрын

He was a liar and idiot

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a member of the Seventh Day Adventists cult --- he lied for a living.

@sarahpfeuffer1396

2 ай бұрын

Yes! My question exactly!

@alchemenergyacademy6231

2 ай бұрын

They’re about 60 years late

@andys3138

2 ай бұрын

I think the site he said was limonite or whatever and was the “wrong” length is the one Ron Wyatt explored but I feel like Ron Wyatt’s documentary explained those objections adequately. He believes the cubit used by Moses was the Egyptian cubit which was longer than the Hebrew cubit because he grew up in Egypt and based on that cubit the length is correct. As far as the iron deposits, he did a scan showing the outline of the site and there are iron deposits regularly spaced relatively evenly that wouldn’t be consistent with a natural rock formation.

Its interesting to me as well. Thanks for both of your work.

It is such a blessing to have a fair assessment of this topic. One of the many reasons I love this channel. Thank you both for your work! Very edifying.

@statutesofthelord

Ай бұрын

Ron Wyatt basically discovered the real ark.

Sean and Titus, I very much appreciate your scholarliness and time given to this fascinating subject. I heard Titus refer to the ark as well short of 500’ for the length of the ark. I understand that as Moses, who is said to have written Genesis, was raised in Egypt he would have used their royal cubit measure of ~20.6-20.8”, not Greek/Roman 18”. Titus has implied the ~18” cubits x 300’ when the ark probably was the greater length of about 515+’. A detail but well worth regarding in searching for this massive boat…whatever may be left! Thanks

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

We are given relationship of the length-height-width measurements too, so using just that, one could make a strong case.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Let’s face it, whether the alleged ark was hypothetically seaworthy or not, there has never, ever been a wooden boat nearly as large as the ark. The closest was built in the nineteenth century, a 449-foot boat (and this included the jib and the boom; actually it was 329 feet). This is yet another indication that the original readers of Genesis would have realized they were dealing with a figurative description of a boat.

@statutesofthelord

Ай бұрын

@@plainsman Your god that you have created in your mind is quite weak.

Great conversation! Always interesting to hear what’s happening in the world of Biblical archeology and to know that it very much an active and bustling field of study!!

Any and all biblical archaeology would be fantastic! I have a bachelor's degree from the University of Arizona in cultural anthropology but was focused also on Egyptology under Dr. Richard Wilkinson and archaeology as a part of that degree. Thanks for having this show!

I'm interested in hearing more about the city of Tyre. It is mentioned so often in the OT but rarely talked about in commentaries.

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

It got a flat.

@tianarhastings8372

Ай бұрын

Mike winger talks about it ☺️ it’s one of his favorite prophesies fulfilled

The problem is that the survivors will use the ship they were on to building their shelters, and later, people's will take stuff from abandoned things to use for other things. We find this in Egypt building, and saving is not a high priority.

@marcj3682

2 ай бұрын

Why? The 8 survivors would LIVE on the ark, post flood, then repopulate accordingly.

@Randylayhe001

2 ай бұрын

@@marcj3682 repopulation with first cousins marrying and having children? As I remember reading the Bible says “all flesh” perished.

@Gutslinger

2 ай бұрын

​@@Randylayhe001Yeah? All flesh outside of the Ark perished. Context matters.

I’d like to hear Titus do an IN DEPTH discussion of Joshua’s altar on Mt EBAL and Adam Zertal’s work and also the curse tablet found by Scott Stripling’s team.

This is great! One broadcast that covers all my friends questions about finding the ark. Thank you both Sean and Titus!

@statutesofthelord

Ай бұрын

Ron Wyatt discovered the Ark, or should I say, put a lot of work into researching the site he mentions at 18:00. It is the actual ark, but this man with letters after his name doesn't like the fact that Ron Wyatt discovered it already.

Dr. Finkle talks about translating cuneiform tablets relating to the Ark however, it is round in size. His tablet's date back 3000 BC to the Sumerian. One of the last expeditions to Mount Ararat was by Dr. Randal Price and Dr. David Graves. No sighting of the ark nor after doing core drilling in the ice was anything found. Dr. Graves lectures on a podcast called Bible Interact.

Ancient historians mention the Ark in their chronicles because it was still a pilgrimage site for many cultures.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Hundreds of years of research in geology, paleontology, biology, and many other fields have produced abundant evidence that the earth is billions of years old and that fossils and geological features formed through many processes over eons of time. Relying on a theory of post-Flood animal evolution in which species diversify at rates many times faster than any known biological mechanism is delusional.

I love this type of video. Anytime I can learn about the bible and the current events around it's historical and archaeological evidence... I'm all in. Thanks.

Enjoy listening to the various forms of evidence and assigned credibility, especially ancient documentation.

Sean, please have Dr. Kennedy back on your channel. I look forward to hearing him discuss any topics of archaeological importance. Thanks so much!

Very interesting! Thank you

Dr Kennedys videos are Always so interesting!

Id love to hear about Nineveh, as well as tyre/Sidon. I’d also love to hear about more anthropological topics like the 10 tribes dispersed and how that applies to the Bible as well, especially the New Testament as Paul journeys through the diaspora to plant churches.

Fascinating!

Do all the cities! I think it'd make a really cool series doing deep-dives focused on geographic regions!

I really enjoyed this program!

Loved the video Sean. Great info and perspective.

Dr. Kennedy's demeanor is highly laudable. Love how kind and soft his manners are.

@markmcflounder15

2 ай бұрын

Right! He is so chill and laid back. Blessings to you CSmoviles! He has some issues with his work (you'd have to check out his debate with Dr. Falk). In contrast, I love how calm & collected he is: his "demeanor is highly laudable." I wanna be more like him.

@portialancaster3442

2 ай бұрын

The survivors would definitely need shelter, not to mention the animals with them.

@statutesofthelord

Ай бұрын

Be careful. Eve was deceived by someone with kind and soft manners. The facts are: The ark was basically discovered by Ron Wyatt. It is the true site that this man with letters behind his name rejects.

So interesting! The Tower of Babel site has some different theories, I wonder what he would think of that

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

We say of a strong young man "he is a fine lad," and in India that word "lad," or "lat" (T and D are the same letters) means the "male organ" or "phallus," as " Asoka's Lat" is a famous iron column or phallus. remember Asoka as endeavoring to introduce, as a universal religion, the teaching of Siddhartha, to unify nations and bring peace. The same word "lad" or "lat" is used as the name of the mountain in which the Ark rested after the Flood. R and L are identical in many languages; for instance, in ancient Egypt, China, and Japan, and the sacred mountain is called to-day by the Arabs "Allah's Lat" (or male organ), which is the same as “Arah's Rat," or Ararat. So, the Ark (the fertile female) rested on Allah's Lat, and brought forth life, an account of a sexual creation. It was 284 days on the "waters," the period of woman's gestation, when "life" issued from the "Ark.". Babel is two words of bab (gate) and el (god).

@duncanfeyd4056

2 ай бұрын

Babel is Kailash. "Mt. Ararat" was named in Ano Donine as an omage to The Flood. Neither that mountain, The Tigris(which is NEVER written ANYWHERE in the original Hebrew), nor the modern river they call "Euphrates" are described in Genesis. The rivers actually described run through the mid-oceanic trenches and terminate in The Phillipines(Ophir/Havillah). Scripture used to even say that Paradise was there. "Ararat" literally just means "High place". The description of The Flood leaves no other place The Ark could have come to rest but Everest. Why is it not there now? The first thing Noah did was offer burnt sacrifices(which required dry wood, and the only dry wood on Earth was The Ark). The people traveled EASTWARD, not the misinterpreted "from the East" two days walk to Shinar(which evolved grammatically to become "China"). Babel was Kailash, and Nimrod is the same person the Hindus called Shiva. I wish people would stop reading the bastardized King James crap and listening to the white pagan in Rome.

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

@@duncanfeyd4056 Shinar is from shan (sun) and naar (boy). Ham = Siva and the four signs/sons of Leo thru Scorpio. Canaan, the fourth son of Ham, is Scorpio. See Isaiah 9.14-15, where Israel (summer) is described as having the head of the noble/royal one (Leo) and tail of the liar ( Scorpio). Scorpio is also called Lud, when Shem (winter) is made out to have five sons (aka Scorpio thru Pisces). These same five signs are found in Revelation 9.5.

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

@@duncanfeyd4056 These four rivers are not confined to Paradise, or summer; they were also the four rivers of Hell or winter. The four river heads of Eden, then, correspond to, and are the four cardinal points. East = Pison, West = Euphrates, North = Hiddekel and South = Gihon. In the early ages, the East and the West points of the horizon must have first engaged the attention of mankind - the East as the first to appear in the morning; the West as the last to disappear at night. Accordingly, we find the East (Pison = that which shows off' proudly) first named; the West (Euphrates = the region of fruits = autumn) is the last named. Hiddekel, as all agree, is the Tigris, which word means an arrow, the symbol of the North. Gihon, literally the breaking forth of the Sun, is the South, the point whence the Sun is seen to begin his annual tour to the North. (Gen. 2:11, 14.) It was upon this river Gihon that Homai, the fabled mother of mankind, "committed her son Darab, the Persian Moses, in a little wooden ark," to be picked up and educated by a dyer, to whose place (the morning of the spring equinox, which is dyed red) the little vessel drifted. (Geo. Stanley Faber, Pag. Idol., vol. 3, p. 183.)

@duncanfeyd4056

2 ай бұрын

@@harveywabbit9541 Astrology has absolutely zero place in Judaism. Keep your pagan sorcery out of this.

Absolutely fascinating! Titus, we have so much in common! You Rock! & I’m dumb as a rock! But THANK YOU for your devotion to study. Your knowledge inspires & magnifies JESUS. Stay amazing!

I always love the interviews with Superman…I mean Dr. Kennedy 😅

I am wondering to what degree the "pitch" on the outside would have preserved the Ark? Of course it was only on the outside, so as the top-side disintegrated, the inside would be exposed to the elements. Not to mention earthquakes, glaciers, etc...

@Mr05Chuck

2 ай бұрын

Genesis 6:14. Tells us the ark was pitched both on inside and outside. Some ( Chuck Missler) think this was done to preserve the ark for later discovery

@bobthrasher8226

2 ай бұрын

@@Mr05Chuck Yeah, thanks, I read that after my post... I can't think why he would apply water proofing to the inside, except that God told him to. Inside water proofing doesn't work against the hydro-static pressure.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Hundreds of years of research in geology, paleontology, biology, and many other fields have produced abundant evidence that the earth is billions of years old and that fossils and geological features formed through many processes over eons of time. Relying on a theory of post-Flood animal evolution in which species diversify at rates many times faster than any known biological mechanism is delusional.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.

Love this type of video! I appreciate all you do!

When I was 28 in early 1980's, I went (drove) up Pike's Peak, played in snow in June there, and NOT used to such altitude, and ended up getting altitude sickness (very bad headache, fatigue) slept 14 hours straight on return to Colorado Springs. Pike's Peak is similar height to Ararat. If Kennedy or anyone else goes to Ararat, and wants to visit the top of it, I'd suggest becoming acclimatized to increased altitude first, long enough to allow oxygen carrying red blood to thicken, or you will not be able to stay there more than half to one full daylight period before contracting altitude sickness. It's not a "day trip" sort of experience.

Loved it. Would love to have Joel and Titus at the same time!

Great interview. I’m going to grab Dr Kennedy’s book on biblical archeology. I finished Joel Kramer’s and am ready for more!

Hang on a minute why are u dismissing Ton wyatt discovery of Noahs Ark That all seems good

@davidjanbaz7728

2 ай бұрын

He's a total Charlatan!!!

@markmcflounder15

2 ай бұрын

ohhhhh..... 'The first to speak sounds correct until the second speaks' Prov. 18:17. There are serious problems with Ron Wyatt. To reference Frank Turek's ministry, you gotta do you cross examination.

@MrDavidLambert81

2 ай бұрын

Ron Wyatt found the ark

@alancooke1131

2 ай бұрын

@@MrDavidLambert81 Nah!

@hanlisteenkamp1437

2 ай бұрын

Yes Steve, I wanted to ask the same questions. And if Ron Wyatt was such a big Charlatan, it's even more strange that neither Titus nor Sean mentioned him - neither bad or good. Just nothing??? Tháts indeed stranger than fiction.

Years ago when the ice melt was very low, didn’t a Sherpa like person claim to see the outline of a huge boat even claiming to see cage like bars or separations. I remember seeing a special or reading about this person. Do you remember that ?

Thank you for this video. Very interesting regarding locations that are very interesting to learn more about. God Bless

I love this type of content! Archaeology is truly amazing stuff!

Mount Ararat is not a single mountain but several

@shulamiteKINGSbride

Ай бұрын

Two side by side Agri Dag in eastern Turkey

@ez2u1

Ай бұрын

@@shulamiteKINGSbride it is a groups of mountains

Hi Sean ! I love watching your channel, especially when Titus is on 😊. In watching this latest episode about Finding Noah's Arc with Titus I had a question about fossils found. This is probably a stupid question because I don't understand but why is there never mention of human bones found after flood, or is there? Stupid question I know, just trying to understand. 😊 Thank you! Robin

I would love to learn about Ur, or Perses. Why the Romans were so adamant about that border, when i have heard next to nothing about it.

How did they catch polar bears and penguins? Or grizzly bears?

@hambam7533

2 ай бұрын

they didnt have to catch anything the animals came to him because that is what God willed, if he can create all things he can bring animals to noah ,God does what he desires if he couldnt do that he is not all powerfull therefore is not God

@letsgobrandon416

2 ай бұрын

@avgmasgter1 If you are going to criticize, at least criticize the actual telling of the story, and the actual claims. Not your strawman ignorance.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Hundreds of years of research in geology, paleontology, biology, and many other fields have produced abundant evidence that the earth is billions of years old and that fossils and geological features formed through many processes over eons of time. Relying on a theory of post-Flood animal evolution in which species diversify at rates many times faster than any known biological mechanism is delusional.

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

Maybe with help, like Daniel in the Lion's Den? Or consider Balaam's donkey and what they and the angel talked about.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.

Ron Wyatt found it ....... :)

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a hustler who snookered investors with his fraudulent videos. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries have ever made an appearance in any science journal requiring peer review of actual hard data.

@Sean McDowell from the comments it looks like Titus needs to address Ron Wyatts claims specifically.

Sean and Titus, do look into where the best Grapes in the World come from (ask the French) and what the Ancient Egyptian word for 'Grapes' is.

I would like to know if someone has found the Egyptian army remains from the crossing of the red 🌊.

@michaels6466

2 ай бұрын

Look up Ron Wyatt and a great book by Johnathan Gray named Ark of the Covenant, trying to disprove his findings.

@biddiemutter3481

2 ай бұрын

Would bones or anything else survive in the sea? Surely it's more likely that anything would be washed far from where they crossed within minutes of the waters returning?

@klouis1886

2 ай бұрын

​@@michaels6466scammer

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

Dead bodies float after 3-5 days from gases building up in them. So that army wouldn't all end up located in a tight group of skeletons.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

After a century of excavations trying to prove the ancient accounts true, archeologists say there is no conclusive evidence that the Israelites were ever in Egypt, were ever enslaved, ever wandered in the Sinai wilderness for 40 years or ever conquered the land of Canaan under Joshua’s leadership. To the contrary, the prevailing view is that most of Joshua’s fabled military campaigns never occurred - archeologists have uncovered ash layers and other signs of destruction at the relevant time at only one of the many battlegrounds mentioned in the Bible. The ancients never intended their texts to be read literally. People who try to find scientific explanations for the splitting of the Red Sea are missing the boat in understanding how ancient literature often mixed mythic ideas with historical recollections. That wasn’t considered lying or deceit - it was a way to get ideas across.

Very very interesting!!

I can appreciate that a decent sized chunk of the Ark would have been used for shelter, wagons, barns, for vineyards, etc. over the course of a couple hundred years. I'd like to think there is something left somewhere near the mountains of Ararat, but not a full ship. And I liked the discovery of an old, old vineyard. Cool.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

There is abundant empirical scientific evidence that there was never a global flood, and consequently no ark. The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science. As for that natural rock formation in Turkey frequently misidentified as a boat, any professional geologist would recognize that as a doubly plunging syncline, and nothing more. Additionally, a major warning sign of pseudo-archaeology includes discoveries pitched directly to the media. The pseudo-archaeologist knows his or her claim will not stand up to scrutiny by actual archaeologists, nor will their dubious "data" ever be able to pass the rigorous peer review required to achieve publication in an independent science journal, so it gets pitched directly to the media in one form or another.

I don't think God would want it to be found, for the same reason He hid Moses' body. It seems like he has veiled all the possible articles that we could worship, the ark, the serpent/staff, etc

@WisdomThumbs

2 ай бұрын

It’s visible on one of the slopes of Ararat, just in poor condition. KZreadr “Gerrit Aalten” filmed two videos in the Ark’s frozen interior. The Ark is in Turkey, a protected historical site discovered by WW2 pilots, and preserved under a mudflow caused by volcanic eruption. It’s surrounded by drilled anchor stones for hundreds of miles, full of petrified wood (some of which is visible construction, some of it reduced to patterned dirt), and also full of *aluminum and tungsten rivets, braces, and slag in the hold.* The alloys were tested in Los Alamos decades ago, and Los Alamos thought it came from a rocket crash… Nope, it came from a mountaintop ship thousands of years old, and all of this is documented. The volcanic mudflow itself is thousands of years old. It fits the dimensions described in the Bible if you use the Royal Cubit. Some of the wood is made from planks glued together with pine pitch (gopher wood, apparently). I see no reason to doubt these findings… Unless someone just hates Ron Wyatt or astronaut James Irwin, in which case the doubt seems irrational to me. Since the structure is undeniable once you’ve seen it, and seen how the research was performed… It’s either the real Ark, or a perfect reconstruction in the bronze age, predating the mudflow. Since mankind didn’t rediscover alloys like tungsten and aluminum until the current era, I’m leaning toward the site being authentic. Feel free to present a case otherwise and I’ll read it with hopes of learning more or otherwise! People often assume the Ark would be repurposed for houses. But the lumber would be unfit for houses, especially when stone and mud bricks were plentiful and easier to clean.

@rayross997

2 ай бұрын

I agree with you. Read Jer.3:16 in regards to the ark of the covenant. Some people would make it an object of worship. I think God would never allow the ark of the covenant to be found. And maybe it no longer exists. Everything in the ark of the covenant pointed to Christ.

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

Moses is a personification of Aquarius. Just like Ganymede.

@doreencaputo2942

Ай бұрын

@@harveywabbit9541 can you elaborate please?

@harveywabbit9541

Ай бұрын

@@doreencaputo2942 After the children of Israel had avenged themselves of the Midianites, and captured their young virgins for future use, Moses was "gathered unto his people" (Num. 31.2), i.e., leaving the Sun, "he went and returned, and dwelt" with the Sun - he completed the circle of the zodiac, or year. Having thus looked upon the Promised Land (summer), Moses died, and buried himself in a valley in the land of Moab (water-father = Aquarius = Moses), "but no man knoweth of his sepulcher unto this day" (Deut. 34.6). Although one hundred and twenty years old, " his eyes," it is said, " were not dim (his stars shine as brightly now as they did then), nor his natural force abated (the rainy season still comes on every year) " However, the people wept thirty days, i.e., during the passage of the Sun through Aquarius, the Wash-pot (Ps 60.8), or the rainy month of January.

I am no archeologist so I speak from a layperson's perspective. If Noah and his family came out of the ark to a completely destroyed world, wouldn't they have needed to dismantle the ark for building and living supplies?

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

Seems they at first lived in tents, if you read story about Noah, and the conflict with Xam (Ham) and how the other 2 sons took care of the problem. Remember where Noah took his nap, after a bit too much wine? A tent.

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

We say of a strong young man "he is a fine lad," and in India that word "lad," or "lat" (T and D are the same letters) means the "male organ" or "phallus," as " Asoka's Lat" is a famous iron column or phallus. remember Asoka as endeavoring to introduce, as a universal religion, the teaching of Siddhartha, to unify nations and bring peace. The same word "lad" or "lat" is used as the name of the mountain in which the Ark rested after the Flood. R and L are identical in many languages; for instance, in ancient Egypt, China, and Japan, and the sacred mountain is called to-day by the Arabs "Allah's Lat" (or male organ), which is the same as “Arah's Rat," or Ararat. So, the Ark (the fertile female) rested on Allah's Lat, and brought forth life, an account of a sexual creation. It was 284 days on the "waters," the period of woman's gestation, when "life" issued from the "Ark.".

There have been several “Mt. Arrarats” in history. One of the most credible places for the ark is Mt. Judy (sp?), where they have found some of the oldest writing in the world (that mention the graves of Noah and his sons) as well as possibly the tomb of Noah himself. I’d like to see some more information on that.

I believe there would have been some sort of significant flood, considering the other ancient flood narratives that are similar to the Bible account etc. I’m just curious though, that if a mountain of that elevation is continuously covered by ice and snow, if water was covering mountains that high, wouldn’t the temperature be freezing? Also has there been enough water on earth to cover mountains that high - did the excess water all go underground or evaporate? Because that’s a lot of water. I’d like to know if there have been any geological studies in the area of ancient Mesopotamia for evidence of ancient flooding and how flooding impacted the geology. Regarding fossils at high elevation, some are due to plate tectonics where mountains are pushed up, thus marine fossils appear on the tops of mountains because they were once under the sea before plate tectonics formed the mountains.

De pigeon with the olive leaf returning to Noah in the ark explains the area where the ark landed. Olivetrees grow not above approx. 1500m. The area nowadays of about 1500m. is at least 300km southwest from Araratmountain.

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

Ararat means allah's phallus.

@biddiemutter3481

2 ай бұрын

The only thing about this is that birds are able to fly very long distances without landing. So the water would have had to go down below the level of the olive, but it doesn't show where the Ark was because the distances between the tree and the ark would have been no problem for the bird.

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

Flood washed a lot around, uprooted a lot, and left sea things on mountain tops, so possible an olive tree washed up on a mountain. It's also possible air was thicker in those days, allowing greater growth and at higher tree line altitudes than today.

If there's a part 2, I would be interested if LiDAR or other aerial technology would be a viable route to identify an ark imprint or the altar mentioned in Gen. 9? Given that there is a possibility that volcanic, glacial, or seismic activity might have erased any evidence, not finding anything would not be conclusive evidence against it.

@brettwheeler7753

2 ай бұрын

Satellite imaging has been used to uncover ancient Egyptian buildings and monuments that were buried, so the technology does exist. Egypt of course is dry and artifacts last extremely long in that environment. Is actually be surprised if it hasn't been done already, i.e. satellite scans of Mt Ararat.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.

Please talk about Mount Zion Dig. Thanks and Blessings

I love learning, so this was really interesting to me! Thanks! If God wants us to find the ark, we will!

Did he say "popular command?" 😆

@brianclark528

2 ай бұрын

I mean, I love this stuff. I'm a Bible believing Christian. Etc. but "popular command?" That's ridiculous.

I've seen in other documentaries, the Turkish government is very strict letting excavations done in the mount Ararat area, so we wonder what is the plan. Maybe the world does not want us to find out the truth.

@appaloosa42

2 ай бұрын

It’s not “Mount Ararat”… it’s in …”the MOUNTAINS of Ararat.”

Interesting!

Given the land must have been deluded of any building material at all there is surely little chance of any remains because it would have been utilised for building material and much else.

It is fairly logical to think they would have reused a lot of the wood from the ark to build their settlement. Hard to imagine anyone would find anything useful to dig up from this.

@jeremycoleman318

2 ай бұрын

I literally just had that thought for the first time and then saw your comment. That's a massive amount of building supplies and they would be complete morons to spend time chopping down new trees when it's already in board length.

@vanmanrick1

2 ай бұрын

Not to mention after a huge flood there would have been no timber

@mattd624

2 ай бұрын

Good point. If the ark landed high enough on a mountain, it seems to me it would not be worth trying to haul it in part or in whole, down the steep and rocky terrain. But they might not have landed high. It seems reasonable to think that if they landed anywhere near these 2 mountains, they’d say they landed “in the mountains of Ararat”. It could have been a flat place they landed and were able to settle right there at the landing site, in which case, yeah, they would have used the wood to build a city, I’m sure.

@brunovbc

2 ай бұрын

There's a tradition that a Bishop was going to look for the Ark but an Angel stopped him telling him not to go and the angel gave him a piece of wood from the Ark.

@sh4dow2788

2 ай бұрын

​@@brunovbcinteresting... Makes me think of when the rich man said to lazurus in hell across the chasm to paridise/Abrams bosom. He said for him to tell his family about this place and I believe Jesus said they have Moses and the prophets. Basically saying that it wouldn't help even if he did tell his family about that place. Makes me wonder if God even wants us to find definitive history. Maybe it undermines faith. Also Jesus said blessed are those who don't see and believe.

This guy needs a Red Bull or something. It's a fascinating subject but the way he talks makes Bueller's teacher seem like James Earl Jones.

@Mr05Chuck

2 ай бұрын

Just put the speed on 1.5x and you will not only save time but your health will be better.

@amberstarrfaw

2 ай бұрын

Bahahahahahahaha

@jerrybessetteDIY

2 ай бұрын

I watch most videos at 1.75 speed. I don't have the patience for normal speed.

The video was very informative. In terms of what your request on what I’d like to see someone address: 1) Is the “Village of Eight” in Turkey possibly linked to Noah’s ark or is that place a fraud; 2) why was there a Jewish Temple on Elephantine Island in Egypt during the Babylonian exile; 3) was the Ark most likely hidden by Jeremiah in Israel or could God have permitted it to be destroyed; 4) what do you think of David Rohl’s theory on the location of Eden (or is there a better one); and 5) who was Theophilus. (Always thought the idea he was a high Roman official was credible, but recently heard there was a Jewish high priest by the same name who might have converted to Christianity and moved to Antioch.

Curious if Dr. Kennedy has thoughts on The Ark and the Darkness movie that recently came out. I found the movie and this episode equally compelling and in congruence.

Ron Wyatt found it why don't we talk about him

@victorvixxjorge4095

2 ай бұрын

Whats exsactly what i was thinking

@davidgardner863

2 ай бұрын

, Because he didn’t find anything but a lot of gullible people.

@markmcflounder15

2 ай бұрын

Yeah, Ron Wyatt is not trustworthy. He found a lot of things buuuuut did he produce any evidence thereof.

@markmcflounder15

2 ай бұрын

ahhhh man! There are multiple people referring to Ron Wyatt. That is painful. Wyatt is not credible. I mean,....where is his documentation and, or evidence???

@NYC1025

2 ай бұрын

What about what Ron Wyatt found is not evidence?

Very surprised to find Sean taking the Noah story literally. As an atheist/agnostic, I find it very frustrating as many Christians laugh at atheists who bother to argue against the flood story but here we see Christians taking it very seriously. Christians, get your house together so we can stop trying to nail jello to the wall. One point- shared/similar stories across cultures does not mean a common event, but more likely borrowing and varying narratives and tropes, especially in an area where intellectual exchange was common.

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

Noah means earth at rest. Earth was thought to be both male and female. The ah appended to No/Nu is female. Same with the ah appended to Terra which became Terah/Torah.

@BigIdeaSeeker

2 ай бұрын

@@harveywabbit9541 which has what to do with what in terms of evangelicals being literalists?

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

@@BigIdeaSeeker Fairy tales should not be read or interpreted in the literal.

@TinusTegenlicht

2 ай бұрын

The same happens vise versa, so I don't get your point at all. Borrowing stories? Really? From South-America to China they all exchanged stories, even with the Vikings?

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

@@TinusTegenlicht Moses, the lawgiver is also Huitzilopochtli, the solar and war deity of sacrifice in Aztec religion. He was also the patron god of the Aztecs and their capital city, Tenochtitlan.

I'm just starting the vid but I would guess the wood is long gone right? Shouldn't it have rotted into nothing? Either that or Noah's family stripped it and used it for homes.

Interesting and helpful! Is this a dumb question?--> If the high altitude of Mt Ararat is always frozen over and not conducive to human flourishing, might God have rested the ark on one of the lower mountains in the Arafat region instead?--or even "nestled between mountains"? Does the original language explicitly say the ark rested on the peak of the very first mountain to be exposed when the water receded (and therefore the highest)? Thanks for this! Biblical archaeology is fascinating and faith-affirming

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

All we know is he eventually ran aground somewhere in Ararat mountainous region. LOL, wouldn't that have been a bad day if he'd landed on top of a volcano, and then it blew up.

Wooden structures don't last long when it's the only source of building material, I would be very surprised if a whole Noah's Ark!

@user-sq4jz9up6g

2 ай бұрын

It was covered with pitch for water proofing

@WisdomThumbs

2 ай бұрын

Check out the historical site researched by astronaut Steve Irwin, Los Alamos, and Ron Wyatt. It’s either THE Ark preserved by a volcanic mudflow, or it’s an expert reconstruction made long ago. Either way, we know the volcanic mudflow is quite old. The site features tungsten and aluminum rivets, fastening plates, and slag ballast in the hold. So I’m leaning toward “authentic,” since those metals were only invented (or rediscovered) relatively recently.

@biddiemutter3481

2 ай бұрын

@@WisdomThumbsyes, there's definitely no mention of aluminium in the Biblical account!

@WisdomThumbs

2 ай бұрын

@@biddiemutter3481 There are no mention of the anchor stones, either. Or most of the mothers’ names in genealogies. Or Jesus’ siblings names, save one. EDIT: Biddiemutter corrected me on this example, we know the names of multiple brothers. What IS mentioned is that the pre-Flood world had a lot of tech and knowledge, which was given in trade for wives. So, knowing that only critical details were put in the book, we have to make deductions.

@biddiemutter3481

2 ай бұрын

@@WisdomThumbs Mathew mentioned four brothers by name, not that it's vital, but just saying. “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? Mathew13:55

My problem with Wyatt is that he claims to have discovered so many things that it gets preposterous.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

The only thing Wyatt found was how to snooker investors into funding his outfit, but none of these investors ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence supporting Wyatt's claims because all of his videos turned out to be carefully constructed frauds.

@Gutslinger

2 ай бұрын

One of my problems is that I don't think a lot of them are closely examined with the full context of scripture. They might cherry pick from a few verses to make the locations seem legit, but when you use all of the scriptures, there seems to be some unresolved problems. Like his belief of the Red Sea crossing location. Or the location of Jesus' tomb. I was strongly leaning towards all of his "discoveries" when I first came across those videos, but then I watched videos of other locations in which they add more scriptural and historical context, which seem to debunk some of Ron Wyatt's claims. Could he be right about some of the locations? Possibly. But some have issues that seem hard or impossible to reconcile. But a ton of people have watched videos about his "discoveries" and believe his claims like it's the Gospel, and go after anyone who discusses a different location. Or if someone discusses a location that Ron Wyatt had made claims about, they go after them for not bringing up Ron Wyatt's name and giving him credit. It's almost cult-ish behavior.

@shulamiteKINGSbride

2 ай бұрын

Scripture tells us where all these things are. None of it is lost, or ever was.

@margiehelberg4594

Ай бұрын

Ron Wyatt was really the trailblazer in the late 70s through the 90s and most of his finds have been followed up by subsequent archeologists and confirmed. It isn't really prepostorous

@Gutslinger

Ай бұрын

@@margiehelberg4594 Which ones have been confirmed?

Also interested in what evidence of the Mosses stories and the 40 years in the wilderness

One place that does not get much attention is Glastonbury England which is a place where Joseph of Arimathea visited and possibly young Jesus with him on his trade routes.

I was skeptical myself, seeing the video come up in my feed, but I am glad for the evenhanded approach of both yourself and this archaeologist. I am aware of the constant claims that the ark has been found in. It just seems unlikely to me that it would be, even though I do believe literally in the story of Noah’s ark.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.

@statutesofthelord

Ай бұрын

Ron Wyatt basically discovered it. They talk about it in this video around the 18:00 mark.

Ron Wyatt found it!

@rigavitch

2 ай бұрын

I really like Ron Wyatt RIP

@davidjanbaz7728

2 ай бұрын

Actually NO!!!

@brunovbc

2 ай бұрын

No he didn't.

@nozrep

2 ай бұрын

who is that and why do some people say he did and why do some people say he did not

@markmcflounder15

2 ай бұрын

Ron Wyatt is not credible! Unfortunately, he's like the Christian version of Zeitgeist: the Movie

Everyone seems to be overly interested in where the supposed ark settled post flood. Are there any interest in finding the area where the ark was actually built? How likely would it be for any remains to be discovered at such a site as well as where the ark supposedly settled after the flood?

So the part about the Durupunar site. He says the ark is about 450 feet long and the site is 538. Answers in Genesis has the ark being about 510 the difference is how long a cubit is, ~17-18 inches to ~20-21 if you take 21 times 300 you are at 525 feet. Difference of 13 feet.

Yes, by Ron Wyatt.

@markmcflounder15

2 ай бұрын

Where? What evidence did he show?

@Oissst2012

2 ай бұрын

​@@markmcflounder15This channel is sus--picious ..I cannot believe these 2 is dismissing the Turkish governments archaeological findings, the scientific collaboration on u.s. labs and findings for strong evidence with r0n wy@tt .. this channel is a big sus--pect for me. be--ware of these 2.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a hustler who snookered investors with his fraudulent videos. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries have ever made an appearance in any science journal requiring peer review of actual hard data.

Alice in Wonderland.

@robertdelisle7309

2 ай бұрын

Like abiogenesis?

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

@@robertdelisle7309 Because "poof!goddidit!" makes better sense than a chemical reaction causing the formation of self-replicating molecules.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

@@robertdelisle7309 Because poof!goddidit! makes more sense (cough).

*_Urartu (Ararat)_* expanded and contracted over time, that is, some of its rulers made conquests taking its boundaries a little further than what most maps show, so there could possibly be a place which could fit the requirements of *_altitude, geological age and location,_* since in the _mountains of Ararat_ not only *_Mount Ararat_* fit these points, there were some others _(کوه)_ wich actually did. We just have to take a look at the list of the *_mountains_* within the boundaries of the _mountains of Ararat,_ and delimit some of them which even have had reports from alleged eyewitnesses of sightings, some of these very ancient and others more recent, less than fifty years ago.

I’m interested in learning about Thessalonika and Berea

@SeanMcDowell

2 ай бұрын

Thank you!

It is sobering to see two highly educated men talking seriously about a historical Noah’s ark. Yikes.

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a member of the Seventh Day Adventists cult --- he lied for a living.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

No, it's embarrassing.

When searching for artifacts to The Hebrews crossing the Red Sea with Noah, people unrealistically expected to find intact 3500 year old intact items from Pharos army. The truth however was that they found at the assumed crossing site, distributed small coral groupings, some of which appear to resemble chariot bits. Fact remains, it’s not reasonable to expect to find 3500 year old intact wooden chariots, strewn about the sea floor. Wood simply is not going to survive that long. … I would think it more beneficial to look at the fossilized remains of water borne creatures and elements, which makeup part of the Ararat soil, over its heights, as the results of such a study, could clearly testify to the flood event.

@JoeZyzyx

2 ай бұрын

Have you ever picked up driftwood along an ocean shore? Have you read of Roman first century ship discoveries 2 thousand years later?

@JohnC-nw3uu

2 ай бұрын

You mean with Moses right? They crossed with Moses. Not Noah.

@statutesofthelord

Ай бұрын

You can see the videos of glittering golden wheels on the floor of the Red Sea.

@JoeZyzyx

Ай бұрын

Ever hear of "Otzi"? Body found, on a mountain, after 3500 years.

At the baes of a mountain, and along a river bed, some scared smooth mountain rocks with slight traces of pitch, maybe some iron deposits, that's all can possibly be expected from the ark.

Doesn't Sean have a PhD too? Do it Dr Kennedy, hope you do it! Please at least do the survey. Exciting! Love that these guys are pure class. Smooth. These brothers are just facinating. Always fun when Titus visits Sean. Great fun gentlemen. I love archeology. Near mesmerizing. Good times!

Everyone knows Ron Wyatt already located Noah's Ark which is why a replica is in KY. He also located The Ark of the Covenant, the place where Israel crossed the Red Sea, and where Moses and the children of Israel wondered in the wilderness with proof. It's

@s.d.melcher

2 ай бұрын

Yes, indeed!

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a hustler who snookered businessmen and TV producers into investing in his "investigations" in return for film rights. No one who threw cash at Wyatt ever saw a shred of actual empirical scientific evidence supporting his claims because all of his videos were carefully constructed frauds. A major warning sign of pseudo-archaeology includes discoveries pitched directly to the media. The pseudo-archaeologist knows his or her claim will not stand up to scrutiny by actual archaeologists nor will their sketchy "data" ever be able to pass the rigorous peer review required to achieve publication in an independent science journal, so it gets pitched directly to the media.

@scottieledford9371

2 ай бұрын

Isn't it ridiculous how much evidence Ron shared and how these so called experts ignor it like a bunch of idiots!😊😅😂😅😊 It's sad actually when people can see a 500 cubit boat outline on the mountains of Ararat exactly where the bible says it should be.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a hustler who snookered investors with his fraudulent videos. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries have ever made an appearance in any science journal requiring peer review of actual hard data.

Well hell yeah it has been found. The same guy that found the Ark of the Covenant found it. He said the blood ran down to the Ark of the covenant from the cross in such a manner which its path made a map of the Ark location. He also said if you look closely at the shroud of Turin there are some geographical coordinates for the Ark in the DNA sequence of the blood. He did warn other treasure hunters that he had a problem looking for the tree of life and that the Cherubs tried taking his head off. He said if he tried again for that tree he would parachute down to it. He said if he can take a bite of the fruit before the Cherub sword makes contact to him, he will survive.

@geraldbritton8118

2 ай бұрын

The reason this vid doesn't discuss the supposed discover is that it doesn't pass critical analysis.

@kristinwright6632

2 ай бұрын

🤣🤣🤣

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a hustler who snookered investors with his fraudulent videos. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries have ever made an appearance in any science journal requiring peer review of actual hard data.

Good video many thanks. What about Ron wyatts findings in the 70s ? Your obviously dismissing this but why?

The Durupinar site is not 530' it is 500'. This puts it right at the 20" Egyptian cubit conversion range Moses would have likely been using. I have yet to see convincing evidence that this is not it.

@maylingng4107

2 ай бұрын

The site is just a rock formation; a religious made up hoax.

Ron Wyatt has found the Ark many years ago....

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a hustler who snookered investors with his fraudulent videos. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries have ever made an appearance in any science journal requiring peer review of actual hard data.

Didn’t they find it already 😂😂😂

What about the buried structure that Ron Wyatt’s found?

Jericho and Ninevah would be fascinating....actually, many of the ancient cities and the verificty of their existence, ways of destruction, location...

As long as we are looking for things that never existed, could someone do a search for the Golden Fleece and for Excalibur?

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

The Golden Fleece is yours for the taking. The constellation Aries dares you to try.

@chaseparish1791

2 ай бұрын

Why are you on this site? Go troll somewhere else.

@Army4Runner

2 ай бұрын

How do you know they never existed?

@harveywabbit9541

2 ай бұрын

@@Army4Runner Hercules carried them off to the Heavens.

Ron Wyatt found it.

@sh4dow2788

2 ай бұрын

Sorry to say it, Ron Wyatt is a self delusional fraud unfortunately. I believed his discoveriea for a long time. After founding out he was a 7th day Adventist I dug deeper and he had many holes and inadequate proof. Most likely he was seeing things he wanted to see.

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a huckster who snookered investors with his fraudulent videos. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries have ever made an appearance in any science journal requiring peer review of actual hard data.

“Flood Fossils” is a must read for fact based, archaeological & scientific approach to The Flood. Includes fascinating section on Noah’s Ark, size, shape, historical scholarship & a careful analysis of modern eyewitness testimonies on greater Ararat.

Ninevah! Please! I'm in the middle of a Jonah study.

Ron Wyatt found the ark Noah rode on and the ark God had Moses build.. stop being arrogant...

@plainsman

2 ай бұрын

Wyatt was a huckster who snookered investors with his fraudulent videos. Not ONE of his alleged discoveries have ever made an appearance in any science journal requiring peer review of actual hard data.

@shulamiteKINGSbride

2 ай бұрын

No he found something. The Ark is ON Agri Dag Mt Ararat. Two mountians side by side. The Ark is in the glacier. Just like scripture says.