Alpha radiation makes sparks, detects smoke, and eliminates static cling

Ғылым және технология

Interesting applications of a strong polonium-210 alpha radiation source. The half life is only 140 days, so the Staticmaster brushes must be replaced every year or so.
Great technical article on ionization smoke detectors: circuitcellar.com/wp-content/...
Staticmaster refill: www.amazon.com/Static-Master-...
Ionization chamber: www.aliexpress.com/item/32838...
Carl Willis' video on spark gap detectors. (check out his whole channel) • Spark detector for alp...
Polonium poisoning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoni...
sci-hub.tw/10.1088/1361-6498/...
Mightyohm geiger counter: mightyohm.com/blog/products/g...
Applied Science on Patreon: / appliedscience

Пікірлер: 1 100

  • @ASCENDANTGAMERSAGE
    @ASCENDANTGAMERSAGE4 жыл бұрын

    Blowtorch is definitely one of most enjoyable ways to light a candle

  • @Hopeless_and_Forlorn

    @Hopeless_and_Forlorn

    4 жыл бұрын

    Atomic powered blow torch actually. I believe that will be the subject of the next video.

  • @nullvoid3545

    @nullvoid3545

    4 жыл бұрын

    i found the spike upwards on the multi meter when the blowtorch was lit rather intriguing.

  • @DrakkarCalethiel

    @DrakkarCalethiel

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@nullvoid3545 That meter is so darn sensitive that it detected the bloody piezo igniter in the torch. Impressive!

  • @TheExplosiveGuy

    @TheExplosiveGuy

    4 жыл бұрын

    Pretty satisfying lighting a candle with a laser though as well...

  • @rkan2

    @rkan2

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yeah, just what you want near your polonium, apparently.

  • @TOASTEngineer
    @TOASTEngineer4 жыл бұрын

    I love how happy he sounds when he says "polonium is actually very volatile"

  • @NicolaiSyvertsen

    @NicolaiSyvertsen

    4 жыл бұрын

    Nervous laughter

  • @MonsieurLeBoucher

    @MonsieurLeBoucher

    4 жыл бұрын

    at 11:09

  • @cathyerley3057

    @cathyerley3057

    4 жыл бұрын

    Nicolai Syvertsen nah, I don't think so. Been really does get a kick from some of the crazy stuff he deals with, and always with good safety practices.

  • @Jamesvandaele

    @Jamesvandaele

    4 жыл бұрын

    It's very volatile, so much so that it has to be gold plated, so of course I am going to wave this broken piece around that has had its shielding compromised. Nothing bad can happen...

  • @mrchangcooler

    @mrchangcooler

    4 жыл бұрын

    I think he's near laughing at how bad the stuff is. Its like a joke at how bad it is to handle it, that not only is it so poisonous that they don't want to physically touch ot handle it, but it *also* will poison you just by the vapors it releases.

  • @tiberiu_nicolae
    @tiberiu_nicolae4 жыл бұрын

    Applied Science in quarantine: I have a piece of Polonium 210 on a stick!

  • @tiberiu_nicolae

    @tiberiu_nicolae

    4 жыл бұрын

    It would be cool if you tried to do N95 filter material

  • @aliksashka

    @aliksashka

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@tiberiu_nicolae With polonium to kill the virus :)

  • @ColonelAngus101

    @ColonelAngus101

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@tiberiu_nicolae Actually, that's a good video idea: homemade n95 mask out of everyday household materials.

  • @unlost117

    @unlost117

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@tiberiu_nicolae Tech Ingredients did. He demonstrated last week how to deposit copper onto a substrate (which kills bacteria apparently) :)

  • @NapoleonGelignite

    @NapoleonGelignite

    4 жыл бұрын

    Unlost117 - virus can remain active for 4 hours on copper.

  • @Screamingtut
    @Screamingtut4 жыл бұрын

    that Staticmaster brush was used mostly in Photography to brush the dust off negatives. My dad was a Photographer in the 40's-70s we had it in our darkroom when I started to take photos back in 1967.

  • @ColonelAngus101

    @ColonelAngus101

    4 жыл бұрын

    Wouldn't that fog up the negative?

  • @aerogfs

    @aerogfs

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@ColonelAngus101 Not after the film is processed

  • @RobinDobbie

    @RobinDobbie

    4 жыл бұрын

    I wonder if it would be beneficial in cleaning digital camera sensors. It's always a chore.

  • @TheScarvig

    @TheScarvig

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@RobinDobbie i guess its not exactly a good idea to shower a highly sensitive photoreceptor with ionizing radiation...

  • @RobinDobbie

    @RobinDobbie

    4 жыл бұрын

    That's a good guess! I sorta megaderped regarding ionizing radiation and electronics.

  • @adamdapatsfan
    @adamdapatsfan4 жыл бұрын

    Any excuse to use "transmutation" in a sentence about real-world manufacturing is a good one. We're living in such an awesome universe.

  • @paulbuswell6566

    @paulbuswell6566

    4 жыл бұрын

    All those poor old alchemists must be spinning in their graves!

  • @Marci124

    @Marci124

    4 жыл бұрын

    It reminded me of alchemy as well, never heard about it being an integral part of any industrial process before. I recall some experiment where they transmuted lead into gold basically as a demonstration and I imagine to finally close that chapter in the book of alchemy.

  • @Leadvest

    @Leadvest

    4 жыл бұрын

    To them it was generations of obsession and failure. To us it's so utterly pointless, I don't even remember where they ended up doing it(probably Dubna or something). We can transmute matter, whoopee, go transmute me a taco.

  • @renakunisaki

    @renakunisaki

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Marci124 the catch is, sure you can turn lead into gold, but it requires so much energy that it costs more than the gold is worth!

  • @Camwize

    @Camwize

    4 жыл бұрын

    I usually use my Horadric Cube!

  • @jmpattillo
    @jmpattillo4 жыл бұрын

    I used one of those staticmaster brushes to eliminate static from a pump when I was doing physiology experiments in grad school. My patch clamp amplifier was picking up periodic noise that corresponded with the movements of the pump. I finally figured out that it was static from the pump rubbing on plastic tubing. I rigged the brush polonium source to a lab stand and pointed it at the pump. Worked like a charm.

  • @gesamtszenario

    @gesamtszenario

    4 жыл бұрын

    Holy shit, man! For my Master thesis, I did some very simple membrane potential measurements on leech neurons, under a constant flow of saline. I had periodic noise (~ 1 Hz) in my electrode amplifier. I couldn't find the source, and ultimately just ignored it. Peristaltic pump, static. Doh! Yeah, so that's what that was. Thank you for the epiphany, but you're 9 years late.

  • @spike4850

    @spike4850

    4 жыл бұрын

    gesamtszenario that’s so cool

  • @upupina90

    @upupina90

    4 жыл бұрын

    well done :)

  • @jmpattillo

    @jmpattillo

    4 жыл бұрын

    gesamtszenario That is so cool!

  • @upupina90

    @upupina90

    4 жыл бұрын

    How did you find out that it was caused by static charges?

  • @Tyler_0_
    @Tyler_0_4 жыл бұрын

    @7:40 You are probably detecting the x-rays generated when the high energy beta particles hit the metal Geiger tube.

  • @zachreyhelmberger894

    @zachreyhelmberger894

    4 жыл бұрын

    bremsstrahlung?

  • @iainmackenzieUK

    @iainmackenzieUK

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@zachreyhelmberger894 no thanks, I just put one out.

  • @szymon5438

    @szymon5438

    4 жыл бұрын

    Tubes like SBM 20 or STS 5 were designed to detect gamma ray and hard beta according to their data sheet. www.gstube.com/data/2398/

  • @Tyler_0_

    @Tyler_0_

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@szymon5438 Thanks for the link. That tube is very thin, only 50um thick. A significant number of betas from Sr90 (~1Mev) are likely to penetrate inside to be detected directly.

  • @MLGJuggernautgaming

    @MLGJuggernautgaming

    4 жыл бұрын

    Yeah I was gonna say, I don’t think a tube device like that can detect gamma rays directly. You need a photomultiplier setup

  • @HyperIonMake
    @HyperIonMake4 жыл бұрын

    A product that uses transmutation to be manufactured. Damn. That's amazing.

  • @noreason2701

    @noreason2701

    4 жыл бұрын

    What a pointless comment

  • @gytux0258

    @gytux0258

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@noreason2701 what a pointless comment

  • @illidur

    @illidur

    4 жыл бұрын

    What a @@noreason2701

  • @HyperIonMake

    @HyperIonMake

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@noreason2701 The irony is killing me.

  • @lstein8670

    @lstein8670

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@noreason2701 oof someone sounds a bit cranky, have you taken your nap

  • @scottwilliams895
    @scottwilliams8954 жыл бұрын

    "I'm gonna light this candle..."

  • @MrJef06

    @MrJef06

    4 жыл бұрын

    Loved that too! Prrrrroooofff!

  • @Rajamak

    @Rajamak

    3 жыл бұрын

    I was hoping for a massive Cuban cigar.

  • @DrorF

    @DrorF

    3 жыл бұрын

    That was so funny 😆

  • @p_mouse8676
    @p_mouse86764 жыл бұрын

    When having an alpha source, I would HIGHLY recommend redoing the Rutherford experiment. Ideally from his original papers. It's such a good example how dangerous it is to have expectations when starting a certain experiment and how wrong you can be.

  • @redoverdrivetheunstoppable4637

    @redoverdrivetheunstoppable4637

    4 жыл бұрын

    that seems a mildly easy experiment, i didn't know about that, cool

  • @p_mouse8676

    @p_mouse8676

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@redoverdrivetheunstoppable4637 Yes, it is, back in the day they were basically fully convinced about Thomson's plum pudding model. Simply this meant a "positively charged soup". Rutherford very clearly showed that this was not the case.

  • @vivimannequin

    @vivimannequin

    4 жыл бұрын

    What's the Rutherford experiment?

  • @nibblrrr7124

    @nibblrrr7124

    4 жыл бұрын

    ​@@vivimannequin Around 1910, it revealed the internal structure of atoms. It showed that the positive charge & mass were concentrated in a tiny dense nucleus, surrounded by a cloud of electrons on the outside, but with lots of empty space in between. This contradicted Thompson's "plum pudding" model, which said that atoms were made of large positively charged spheres that contained the electrons. @Kris Curkovic explained the details well; just wanted to give a broader context of its importance. ;)

  • @higamitakaro

    @higamitakaro

    4 жыл бұрын

    I'd recommend not to have business with Po-210. Use Am-243 instead.

  • @marcmarc172
    @marcmarc1724 жыл бұрын

    "Sold on Amazon" ... for about two more hours! It says they have two left in stock.

  • @assadasdasdasdasable

    @assadasdasdasdasable

    4 жыл бұрын

    Such an advertisement!)

  • @LutzSchafer

    @LutzSchafer

    4 жыл бұрын

    its ridiculously expensive CDN$ 171.52 already ...

  • @azzajohnson2123

    @azzajohnson2123

    4 жыл бұрын

    KGB brought all their stock..

  • @pilifx
    @pilifx4 жыл бұрын

    That's one hell of a meter being able to still quite accurately measure in the nA range

  • @AsymptoteInverse
    @AsymptoteInverse4 жыл бұрын

    I'm always a little awed every time I'm reminded of just how vicious polonium-210 is. Some back-of-the-envelope math says that a 1-cubic-centimeter chunk of fresh Po-210 (about the size of a sugar cube, and massing about 9.2 grams) would output the same power via decay heat as a hair dryer or electric kettle (circa 1 to 1.3 kilowatts). More than enough to boil itself. And toxic enough to fatally poison something like 10 million to 100 million people.

  • @0118uhauha

    @0118uhauha

    Жыл бұрын

    Who knows , maybe the dude in Moscow is going to use his special "sugar cubes" in Ukraine. His friends ( who are now high ranking officers in Russia ) once used this kind of "sugar" in a pot of tea in London.

  • @mannys9130
    @mannys91304 жыл бұрын

    That production method is genius! So cool!

  • @dnmr

    @dnmr

    4 жыл бұрын

    man i hope they reward people who cooked it up with some sort of a prize... maybe handed out by a king or something

  • @fleetinggerbil
    @fleetinggerbil4 жыл бұрын

    This is definitely one of the more interesting uses of a guitar string I've seen.

  • @glasslinger

    @glasslinger

    3 жыл бұрын

    Sure beats the music from some of the guitars it could have ended up on!

  • @OzgurAgcakaya
    @OzgurAgcakaya4 жыл бұрын

    I need to find immortality just to keep this man alive.

  • @jakenkid
    @jakenkid3 жыл бұрын

    This is one of my absolute favorite things to watch. Not just on YT, but amongst all sources. There's never anything but information. The way he presents is just so pleasant and enjoyable, and so far, most topics are things I would have some active interest in, but occasionally, he will do something and I'll think, "Oh, meh. Not really interested.", but I have to remind myself who the presenter is, and every. Single. Time. I have been open minded, I have been wonderfully surprised! THANK YOU BEN!

  • @bearindawoods6399
    @bearindawoods63993 жыл бұрын

    I have three of those brushes. They are used on film negatives for eliminating static. I knew they are radioactive but never knew the radiation source.

  • @superdupergrover9857
    @superdupergrover98574 жыл бұрын

    Angry helium.

  • @Yrouel86

    @Yrouel86

    4 жыл бұрын

    He he he he

  • @paulculbert1281

    @paulculbert1281

    4 жыл бұрын

    Super PO'd. Buck naked and down two electrons.

  • @SouseMouse

    @SouseMouse

    4 жыл бұрын

    An alpha particle isn't angry- it has no negativity at all! It's manic helium!

  • @bruceanderson7762

    @bruceanderson7762

    3 жыл бұрын

    Yeah ..angry helium ...c-4 is angry Pla Doh ...lol.

  • @theshuman100

    @theshuman100

    3 жыл бұрын

    helium. but fast

  • @JohnRineyIII
    @JohnRineyIII4 жыл бұрын

    Any product manufactured by "Nuclear Products Company" is sure to be interesting. Maybe good, maybe horrible, but definitely interesting.

  • @HuygensOptics
    @HuygensOptics4 жыл бұрын

    I tried to make an estimate of how much Polonium is actually in there by using the intensity of the neutron beam of a commercial nuclear reactor (4.5E+10 cm-2.s-1) and an exposure time of the bisbuth of a few minutes. It amounts to approx a few hunderd picograms of polonium max, much less than 20 nanograms. So you can safely eat the strip (although I would not advice you to ;-))

  • @Leadvest

    @Leadvest

    4 жыл бұрын

    The atoms are also basically individually encased in metal thanks to the manufacturing process. I personally feel iffy about eating radioactive material, so I'll pass regardless.

  • @renakunisaki

    @renakunisaki

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@Leadvest yes, if you eat radioactive material, you'll probably pass... and if not, it will.

  • @Asdayasman

    @Asdayasman

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@renakunisaki You are hereby required to cease.

  • @HuygensOptics

    @HuygensOptics

    4 жыл бұрын

    @hawkturkey But like Ben said, Alpha particles generally don't make it through the very top layer of skin, let alone through a relatively thick layer of.. ehh.. whatever is in your digestive system. So if no Polonium gets into actual tissue (where the Alpha particles CAN do a lot of damage), the risk is relatively small. I think that is why it got admitted in a consumer product.

  • @arthurmead5341

    @arthurmead5341

    4 жыл бұрын

    What do neutron beams have to do with it?

  • @rinner2801
    @rinner28014 жыл бұрын

    I love your videos, you remind me of my physics teacher way back in secondary school. He once gave me detention for messing around with an expensive antique CRT (the cross), but during detention he showed me how to set it up and how it worked. That was the day I became a scientist.

  • @cgflyone
    @cgflyone4 жыл бұрын

    I had at least one Staticmaster brush specifically for photography use in the late 60's-early 70's (junior high-school and later; H.S. class of '72). I did a lot of (mostly) black and white printing from (mostly) 35mm negatives. I might even still have it packed away somewhere, along with my Durst enlarger. Brings back a lot of fun memories, including getting up before school and going into my home darkroom to finish a photo class assignment. 😊 I had the 1" model. I'm amazed that they are still made!

  • @michaelslee4336

    @michaelslee4336

    4 жыл бұрын

    I’ve seen some pictures and I swear they used a Dust enlarger.

  • @Mister_Brown

    @Mister_Brown

    2 жыл бұрын

    @escorpiuser because you use it on developed negatives prior to printing, also basically anything stops alpha probably even the coatings on the photo paper

  • @burpleson
    @burpleson4 жыл бұрын

    Thanks for another great video. This reminds of some work I did many years ago. We were considering the use of mercuric iodide (HgI2) crystals as room-temperature x-ray detectors, and we wanted to look at its sensitivity to radiation damage. The crystals would be irradiated with electrons, then their properties would be measured. When checking the collection of electrons, I could use our standard x-ray sources. However, the hole mobility in HgI2 was much lower, so I had to use alphas from Am241 as a source, so that sufficient charge would be generated. BTW, the alphas didn't penetrate your detector for the same reason that they generate ionization in the air. Their stopping distance is very low because they plow into the material and produce so much charge.

  • @feha92
    @feha924 жыл бұрын

    10:40 transmutes

  • @feha92

    @feha92

    4 жыл бұрын

    @hawkturkey well, yeah. But I'm still happy when fantasy-esque words gets to be used in a mundane manner

  • @vivimannequin

    @vivimannequin

    4 жыл бұрын

    Transmutation time

  • @nibblrrr7124

    @nibblrrr7124

    4 жыл бұрын

    "Rutherford, this is transmutation!" - "For Christ's sake, Soddy don't call it _transmutation._ They'll have our heads off as alchemists." (Actual words spoken in 1901, according to Soddy himself. :D)

  • @nibblrrr7124

    @nibblrrr7124

    4 жыл бұрын

    I wonder how many stable Au-197 atoms Seaborg's team produced in their 1980 collider experiments?* Apparently they used gamma ray spectroscopy to measure yield for each Au isotope, which only works for the unstable ones (whose half-lives Also, the yield is stated in terms of... cross-section area in millibarns? Any way to translate that into # of atoms? (more precisely than "probably a couple" :P) ... How high is the energy bill for a cyclotron, anyway? :D * _Akelklett et al. (1981) Energy dependence of 209Bi fragmentation in relativistic nuclear collisions_

  • @SamBebbington
    @SamBebbington4 жыл бұрын

    “I’m going to light this candle” *grabs blow torch* qwkwkkwkwwk

  • @KingNast

    @KingNast

    4 жыл бұрын

    I lost it when he did that

  • @AureliusR

    @AureliusR

    4 жыл бұрын

    what does qwkwkkwkwwk mean

  • @KaizerPowerElectronicsDk

    @KaizerPowerElectronicsDk

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@AureliusR its the sound of the burning flame

  • @michaelslee4336

    @michaelslee4336

    4 жыл бұрын

    Aurelius R Actually saying the word out loud made me laugh stupidly to my self and my wife to look at me like a needed a padded room.

  • @CpTnlAw
    @CpTnlAw3 жыл бұрын

    Your channel is so intellectually satisfying... Thank you for taking the time to explain all of these different phenomena of so many different scientific fields.

  • 4 жыл бұрын

    2:23 print many different models? What happened to the good old stick enough paper under it until it's fine? ;)

  • @cometboy1
    @cometboy13 жыл бұрын

    The video is quite good and I enjoyed it. One question that I had concerned the method of producing the polonium in place by bombarding a gold plated film of bismuth. The neutrons would also activate the gold film and create a source of beta rays when the Au-198 decays to mercury. Are there any beta emissions from your static master source? Edit: I searched and found that it also has gamma emissions. Another Edit: I had a long talk with a guy from NRD, who make polonium anti-static devices. It was really interesting. Long story short, bismuth is irradiated in a reactor, the polonium is separated by vacuum distillation. The polonium is alloyed with a mixture of silver/bismuth. The polonium forms a eutectic mixture with the silver. The alloy is passivated with layers of gold and nickel. Cheers.

  • @cassandra2860

    @cassandra2860

    2 жыл бұрын

    thank you I came back to this video to figure out how Po-210 was made because I thought that making Au-198 would absolutely not be wanted by the people who make Po-210.

  • @cometboy1

    @cometboy1

    2 жыл бұрын

    @@cassandra2860 I agree about the Au-198. One thing I remember from reading about polonium engineering during the wartime is that the stuff was amazingly mobile. Early shipments of the stuff for the Urchin initiator would arrive at Los Alamos and be alarmingly spread out. From Richard Rhodes book; 'Thomas shipped the Po on platinum foil in sealed containers, but another nasty characteristic of polonium caused shipping troubles; for reasons never satisfactorily explained by experiment, the metal migrates from place to place and can quickly contaminate large areas. 'This isotope has been observed to migrate upstream against a current of air,' notes a postwar British report on polonium, 'and to translocate under conditions where it would appear to be doing so of its own accord.' Chemists at Los Alamos learned to look for it embedded in the walls of the shipping containers when Thomas's shipments came up short.' Cheers.

  • @Alexander_Sannikov
    @Alexander_Sannikov4 жыл бұрын

    1:13 i like the knob on the end of the wire you're using giving away the fact that it's a guitar string :)

  • @4.0.4
    @4.0.44 жыл бұрын

    Every video of yours makes the world seem more interesting and rich in adventure and wonder. Thank you and hope the quarantine is treating you well.

  • @cylosgarage
    @cylosgarage4 жыл бұрын

    I watched this before my online classes today. I guarantee this is the most educational thing I’ll see all day.

  • @electronicsNmore
    @electronicsNmore4 жыл бұрын

    Always great videos.

  • @kestergascoyne6924
    @kestergascoyne69244 жыл бұрын

    "But then they pass the whole sandwich through a particle accelerator..." LOL

  • @nunyabusiness8538
    @nunyabusiness85384 жыл бұрын

    you always come up with amazing video ideas and your intuitive knowledge surpasses everyone else i have watched on youtube

  • @TurkishLoserInc
    @TurkishLoserInc4 жыл бұрын

    As usual, every video you publish is an absolute pleasure to watch. Thank you.

  • @ianluedke
    @ianluedke4 жыл бұрын

    Omg yes this is exactly what I need tonight. Not having a good night. Thank you for all the good times!

  • @ShainAndrews

    @ShainAndrews

    4 жыл бұрын

    OMG... what ever...

  • @AdamChristensen

    @AdamChristensen

    4 жыл бұрын

    ​ Shain Andrews Huh, that's weird. I thought the same thing, but it was when I read your nasty comment. 😂

  • @eddievanhorn5497

    @eddievanhorn5497

    4 жыл бұрын

    Wow, same here man.

  • @UpcycleElectronics

    @UpcycleElectronics

    4 жыл бұрын

    Washed out on the bike today. Took out a rib (I think/not going to beer19 land to find out proper), and added a new layer of battle scars that are just now starting to make themselves nice 'n warm. Still, pedalled 13 miles home in a head wind with 1 arm and blood everywhere. ...was actually doing my physical therapy routine bc I'm already partially disabled from a car hit in 2014... U? :-)

  • @ianluedke

    @ianluedke

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@UpcycleElectronics Definitely not as bad as you my guy. Thoughts and prayers. I just got dumped by my girlfriend of almost a year. :/ KZread is here to help tho.

  • @Neptunium
    @Neptunium4 жыл бұрын

    Polonium has a weak gamma at about 800Kev visible on gamma spectroscopy. The beta from Sr90 are not directly detectable by your geiger but the Bremsstrhalung effect in the glass, plasctic and shell produce xrays .. always loved your videos!

  • @inductivelycoupledplasma6207

    @inductivelycoupledplasma6207

    8 ай бұрын

    This isn't true. Sr-90 betas are more than energetic enough to penetrate the walls of the GM tube. They will travel up to about 1.5mm in steel, and the GM tube has much thinner walls. The amount of bremsstrahlung produced by a small source like the one in the video is essentially undetectable. You're right about the weak gamma line from polonium however! I bet you could easily detect that on a sensitive spectrometer with a 500uCi source.

  • @Neptunium

    @Neptunium

    8 ай бұрын

    @@inductivelycoupledplasma6207 1.5 mm in steel????? Never heard of it in beta radiation!!!!!! 200micro meters (o.2 mm) MAX in living tissue is what I learned and nothing passed a thin sheet of aluminum... but maybe I was missinformed? Maybe more people can weigh in?

  • @blueninja115
    @blueninja115 Жыл бұрын

    We need more science teachers like this guy. Don't tell me, show me. It's so much cooler to see in action too.

  • @threadtag
    @threadtag4 жыл бұрын

    Applied Science No 1 science youtuber! Quality and Clarity of the experiments ensured

  • @albygnigni
    @albygnigni4 жыл бұрын

    So you actually built a ionisation chamber using air as ionising medium. This is actually the basic of some particle detectors (wire chambers). While for the 90Sr source, it is true that the electrons are stopped by the metal shield, but their interaction with it produces photons via brehmsstrahlung and those are being detected.

  • @hyper6500
    @hyper65004 жыл бұрын

    We truly live in the future when you can casually buy some Polonium on Amazon.

  • @vaj1414

    @vaj1414

    4 жыл бұрын

    yeah i think he's the one selling it lmao

  • @duncanw9901

    @duncanw9901

    4 жыл бұрын

    United nuclear used to have a listing for 2kg of weapons-grade plutonium-239 for 250k back in like 2014

  • @ThatDamnFosterKid

    @ThatDamnFosterKid

    4 жыл бұрын

    Think we can use it to power the time circuits in a DeLorean?

  • @hyper6500

    @hyper6500

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@ThatDamnFosterKid FREE 2day shipping from Libya!!!

  • @Muonium1

    @Muonium1

    4 жыл бұрын

    I mean...the people in the 50s were buying down at the corner drug store for the same devices...

  • @dwaynezilla
    @dwaynezilla4 жыл бұрын

    Oh damn, always great videos! Love your test rigs you put together, the explanations along the way, and the little demonstrations (or big demonstrations too!). Keep up the great work!

  • @137bob3d
    @137bob3d4 жыл бұрын

    what a thoughtful & stimulating video to stumble across first thing in the AM

  • @ErikBongers
    @ErikBongers4 жыл бұрын

    That quiet day at the NSA: "Hey Jack, remember that guy that build a Röntgen source in his garage..."

  • @semireality
    @semireality4 жыл бұрын

    10:17 that is a hell of an elaborate way to make a brush...

  • @jamesanderson6882
    @jamesanderson68824 жыл бұрын

    I think this is a great way to get vans with innocuous sounding company names printed on the side to park outside your house and helicopters to follow your DeLorean to work. Keep up the great work.

  • @BuckJolicoeur
    @BuckJolicoeur4 жыл бұрын

    So fascinating. I could see how it's properties can be very useful.

  • @Krzys_D
    @Krzys_D4 жыл бұрын

    I love your videos learn something every time!

  • @byronwatkins2565
    @byronwatkins25654 жыл бұрын

    Only neutrons are used for transmutation. Trying to use protons would be 83 times harder than fusing two hydrogen nuclei.

  • @AppliedScience

    @AppliedScience

    4 жыл бұрын

    Hmm that's a good way of looking at it!

  • @RobotN001

    @RobotN001

    4 жыл бұрын

    low speed neutrons

  • @rogueanuerz

    @rogueanuerz

    4 жыл бұрын

    high energy proton

  • @byronwatkins2565

    @byronwatkins2565

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@rogueanuerz High energy is relatively easy today. Hitting an attometer diameter target is very, very hard.

  • @Kirillissimus

    @Kirillissimus

    3 жыл бұрын

    With nice big syncronous accelerators available today giving ionized hydrogen enough speed to penetrate pretty much anything is entirely possible too.

  • @josephmagniez9580
    @josephmagniez95804 жыл бұрын

    I don't know how he's doing but every single video is more surprising and interesting than the previous one ... Congrats! And thank you so much for all that physics :)

  • @nicoalmachannel
    @nicoalmachannel4 жыл бұрын

    Can't stop watching your videos man... great stuff

  • @OlefinTheHusky
    @OlefinTheHusky4 жыл бұрын

    Interesting that at 5:14 when the blowtorch is lit the ion current goes way up by orders of magnitude...

  • @leocurious9919

    @leocurious9919

    4 жыл бұрын

    Its just a spike from the piezo ignition spark.

  • @leocurious9919

    @leocurious9919

    3 жыл бұрын

    @escorpiuser Yes, thats correct. He ignites it twice at nearly the same position, but the 2nd time nothing happens. So piezo noise could be ruled out fairly certain. But its hard to see where he is pointing the flame... maybe its really the ions in there. Would have been great if he just did that for a few more seconds, waving the flame around.

  • @klydolph2
    @klydolph24 жыл бұрын

    Ive noticed that the older style ionic smoke alarms sometimes gives off a small beep when a lightning strikes nearby. This beep may also come a spilt second before the lightning strikes. Guess it comes from the extreme electrical fieds that are active during a thunderstorm and the way they interfere with the charges partices in the smoke alarm. Maybe this could be used for a protection system that disconnects sensitive equipment just before the lightning strikes.

  • @xw591

    @xw591

    9 ай бұрын

    That's really cool to know

  • @MrWiseinheart

    @MrWiseinheart

    6 ай бұрын

    Hey man that's a good idea

  • @chrissscottt
    @chrissscottt4 жыл бұрын

    Very cool. I'm amazed that such a product is available to buy and fascinated by its properties and how it's manufactured. Thanks.

  • @asvarien
    @asvarien4 жыл бұрын

    Wow that is a super clever method of manufacture.

  • @technobird22
    @technobird224 жыл бұрын

    Awesome! Thank you so much for your amazing videos!

  • @technobird22

    @technobird22

    4 жыл бұрын

    Basically a horizontal spark chamber!

  • @No-mq5lw
    @No-mq5lw4 жыл бұрын

    Right from the get go, I immediately thought of one of those -old- staticmaster brushes. Now I know why it mentions Polonium on the plate. Good stuff as always! Edit: 1:33. Knew it.

  • @Sunny-hc1bf
    @Sunny-hc1bf3 жыл бұрын

    You are a great teacher, I learned quite a lot from you!

  • @avejst
    @avejst4 жыл бұрын

    Wow, another practical physics that I didn't know the background of. Thanks for sharing :-)

  • @KarbineKyle
    @KarbineKyle3 жыл бұрын

    Very nice! This is a great video! I have about 500 μCi of Americium-241, but no fresh polonium-210 sources currently. Am-241 emits a decent amount of low energy gamma rays with a branching intensity of about 36% for 59.5 keV gamma rays and 5.4% for 26 keV gamma rays. The rest of the over a hundred gamma ray energies are less than about 1% and more, so they hardly contribute to more gamma radiation. Po-210 does have a fairly high gamma ray energy, however it's branching intensity is so low, only about 0.001%, so it's often negated. Po-210 only has a half-life of 138 days, so it has to be used fairly quick. Too bad they can't just use Pu-239. It's a nearly pure alpha emitter, and your brush wouldn't need replacements. Ionizing radiation is fascinating! I love this subject! Thanks a lot!

  • @inductivelycoupledplasma6207

    @inductivelycoupledplasma6207

    8 ай бұрын

    500uCi of Am? That's a lot lol

  • @ronniepirtlejr2606
    @ronniepirtlejr26064 жыл бұрын

    You would be the best neighbor to have! I guarantee you, I would be knocking on your door, wanting to watch you & soak up some of that knowledge! You are one awesome guy!

  • @dandeeteeyem2170
    @dandeeteeyem21704 жыл бұрын

    *international spy here* - thanks for the timely advice, you're a life saver! 😅 You remind me of Phi-Loh from "The Vidiot From UHF".. ... Today we are going to make plutonium, from common household items. Haha.. I have learnt 100 times more science from your videos than all my high school teachers combined! 😁

  • @MLGJuggernautgaming
    @MLGJuggernautgaming4 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating video to keep me sane during quarantine

  • @andredepaulagomes
    @andredepaulagomes4 жыл бұрын

    Wow, the current spike after you light the blowtorch (5:13) is just crazy! I think some plasma from the blowtorch got to the plates, and that lowered a lot the air resistance. Please, try to do the high voltage experiment with a bug zapper, that would be nice to see. Btw I think that's what happens when you let those things charged up and they randomly spark; some background radiation ionizing the air could explain the zap after it has been sittig still for 5 minutes

  • @JesusisJesus
    @JesusisJesus4 жыл бұрын

    Fun fact, that brush is made from the hair that fell out of the worker’s head as they assembled them.

  • @ernestoterrazas3480
    @ernestoterrazas34803 жыл бұрын

    Super interesting your video and your comments as always, thank you very much for shearing your big knowledge.

  • @austindale3129
    @austindale31294 жыл бұрын

    Fascinating demonstration, Thank you!

  • @eat_ze_bugs
    @eat_ze_bugs4 жыл бұрын

    This is one of those rare times where I actually need 60fps on KZread.

  • @jhonbus
    @jhonbus4 жыл бұрын

    5:13 you can see the sudden jump in conductivity when some ionised particles from the blowtorch flame get involved. Which is how the other, other fire alarms work!

  • @stuartcoyle1626
    @stuartcoyle1626 Жыл бұрын

    This is the second best use of a guitar string that I know of.

  • @alexoftheway8169
    @alexoftheway81694 жыл бұрын

    That's genuinely fascinating! Thank you for sharing this vidio.

  • @martinsalko1
    @martinsalko14 жыл бұрын

    Wait so I just need a particle accelerator and bismuth to make polonium... I might be able to do that, I mean I won't I'm not stupid, but ye particle accelerator is on my list of DIY projects

  • @xponen

    @xponen

    4 жыл бұрын

    I am seeing a guy that look like Tony Stark making a material for his Arc Reactor using particle accelerator in his house....

  • @Kirillissimus

    @Kirillissimus

    3 жыл бұрын

    You probably already have a particle acceletator in your house. It is located in the back of one of the big boxes you plug to electricity when you want to watch some new stupid show for free. The accelerators are pretty good but not very powerful or versatile as they are. But with enough dedication it should be possible to upgrade one up to the required level. Pretty much the only thing you need to do is to cut off the scteen, to modify the electron gun to allow for local discharge and slow gas introduction, to replace the magnetics, to build a semi-sealed chamber with enogh space for accelerstion pathways and target, to add a vacuum outlet and to design new beam control circuits. It is not a single weekend project but I belive that you can have a personal particle accelerator if you really want it bad enough for whatever reason.

  • @pierretremblay9378
    @pierretremblay93784 жыл бұрын

    I'm very curious to see what would append if you put this source inside a plasma ball.

  • @redoverdrivetheunstoppable4637

    @redoverdrivetheunstoppable4637

    4 жыл бұрын

    nothing actually, the power is too low at the end

  • @joe7272
    @joe72722 жыл бұрын

    amazing how that material is made!

  • @squib308
    @squib3084 жыл бұрын

    Great explanation, I would have otherwise thought the smoke make the air more conductive. I tried to make one of these (spark gap detector thing) but I don't have an alpha source handy; thoriated welding electrodes didn't seem to do the job. I spaced the grid out with pieces of cut up old hotel room keys that I had laying around for misc projects.

  • @masonp1314
    @masonp13144 жыл бұрын

    I'm now more intrigued in the particle accelerator being used to make polonium.. like, so you know for certain you're holding something that MAN created an element inside that. Ancient alchemists would be in awe of the fabled converting one thing to another. I just always found it amazing how elements can turn to other elements with radioactivity

  • @Pcat0

    @Pcat0

    4 жыл бұрын

    ...And then sell it on amazon for $60

  • @noreason2701

    @noreason2701

    4 жыл бұрын

    What a stupid comment. Any ancient person would have been in awe of absolutely anything in the modern world. Stop making stupid comments kid.

  • @xametic2248

    @xametic2248

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@noreason2701 don't say that you salty 12 yo

  • @maximeruys1460

    @maximeruys1460

    4 жыл бұрын

    no shit and also if you mean with "man" made by like putting togheter with adding neutrons, elektrons and protons than your wrong. They just shot at an element with like a highly energetic neutron or something to make it unstable and start to decay and turn into polonium or something.

  • @666Blaine
    @666Blaine4 жыл бұрын

    Now you just need a bit of beryllium and you can initiate your gadget.

  • @radioskeptic5498
    @radioskeptic54984 жыл бұрын

    Wow. Awesome demonstration!

  • @deltabeta5527
    @deltabeta55274 жыл бұрын

    Cool way of lighting the candle!

  • @Spirit532
    @Spirit5324 жыл бұрын

    The company behind these strips(and StaticMaster brushes) will happily sell you a 500 MILLIcurie source after you sign a waiver. It's nuts.

  • @kg5168

    @kg5168

    4 жыл бұрын

    Heck, you can buy tritium-powered radioluminescent flashlights (used by the military to read maps and such at night) online for around 100 bucks, some of them contain a 1.9 Ci tritium source in a fused quartz ampule.

  • @archer9338

    @archer9338

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@kg5168 They also use Tritium powered rifle scopes on all their M4 rifles. The M4s cost $900. The scopes cost $1,500.

  • @Spirit532

    @Spirit532

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@kg5168 Tritium activity is far less dangerous than polonium. Most keychain tritium sticks contain >1Ci. 1Ci of Po-210 would give you contact burns within *minutes*.

  • @alexa.davronov1537

    @alexa.davronov1537

    4 жыл бұрын

    Did you know that you can buy knives and kill someone with them?

  • @Spirit532

    @Spirit532

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@alexa.davronov1537 Knives don't evaporate and smear everywhere if you mishandle them. There's no knife residue you can inhale that will kill you.

  • @jimsvideos7201
    @jimsvideos72014 жыл бұрын

    7:50 Secondary emission?

  • @spacetheory831
    @spacetheory8314 жыл бұрын

    Had to come to the latest video and comment this; your channel is a gift, and I'm eternally grateful for you! Subbed and will continue to follow your content

  • @tsm688
    @tsm688 Жыл бұрын

    this man demonstrated how a spark chamber works in 50 seconds. Nice job

  • @StefanGotteswinter
    @StefanGotteswinter4 жыл бұрын

    The process you describe at Minute 10 sounds incredible complex for a really stupid novelty item like that brush.

  • @MatthijsvanDuin

    @MatthijsvanDuin

    4 жыл бұрын

    I'm pretty sure most antistatic brushes are used professionally. using it to clean LPs sounds like a minor side-market to me.

  • @impeandroid2554

    @impeandroid2554

    4 жыл бұрын

    It is easy to make, probably a couple of minutes of exposure to a commercial cyclotron. The total yield will be ridiculously low. 500uCi is some small fraction of a nanogram.

  • @extrastuff9463

    @extrastuff9463

    4 жыл бұрын

    A few other comments here also mentioned using it for photography to remove dust from negatives. And compared to many other things integrated in our stuff today, probably not that bad really. Produce enough of it at a decent scale and many things can work out to economically make sense.

  • @biswajitjun
    @biswajitjun4 жыл бұрын

    Interesting, Could you show the "Staticmaster brush" working?

  • @symonf1966

    @symonf1966

    4 жыл бұрын

    Not now i'm guessing.

  • @NipkowDisk
    @NipkowDisk4 жыл бұрын

    Many years ago I had a Staticmaster brush for cleaning photo negatives; it worked great. The refills were not cheap, though!

  • @tymonkalbarczyk1456
    @tymonkalbarczyk1456 Жыл бұрын

    Great demo, thanks.

  • @jrmbayne
    @jrmbayne4 жыл бұрын

    Could you use this at a nuclear power plant to prevent someone contaminated with radiation from walking out? "Please walk between the electrified prongs, if they vaporize you you're contaminated."

  • @dustinbrueggemann1875

    @dustinbrueggemann1875

    4 жыл бұрын

    A very Aperture Labs approach to the problem but a conceivably viable one if equipment is less expensive than employees.

  • @Pants4096
    @Pants40964 жыл бұрын

    You should get another cheap geiger counter without a metal shield around the tube so you can detect alpha. My orange fiesta-ware dishes with uranium-oxide glaze are great alpha emitters! Now I want to get a HV power supply and make an arc detector like this!

  • @irukard

    @irukard

    4 жыл бұрын

    LND712 tube has a special window to detect alpha particles. Tube itself cost about 55USD.

  • @Hexalyse

    @Hexalyse

    4 жыл бұрын

    You can also get soviet SBT-11A (СБТ-11А) geiger-muller tubes for less than $30 on eBay. They are great at detecting alpha, and can be hooked to any geiger counter (if the voltage is right)

  • @insightfool
    @insightfool4 жыл бұрын

    Holy crap, that was great! Thanks Ben!

  • @f00z129a
    @f00z129a4 жыл бұрын

    Solid usage of a guitar string. :)

  • @John_Ridley
    @John_Ridley4 жыл бұрын

    2:30 - Print different versions or...just add shims under the magnets.

  • @leocurious9919

    @leocurious9919

    4 жыл бұрын

    Talk about solution in search of a problem :D

  • @frac

    @frac

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@leocurious9919 3D printers are like that. Last week I printed out 4 taco holders (basically plastic trays shaped like sine waves ;-) ). A trip to the dollar store probably would have got me a pack of 10... but I have a 3D printer... why take a 5 minute drive when I can print them off myself in only 5 hours...

  • @leocurious9919

    @leocurious9919

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@frac Hahaha, nice! I higly doubt that I would be any different if I had one. But so far there was no "need to have" moment where I needed one :D

  • @ilyadorokhov7827
    @ilyadorokhov78274 жыл бұрын

    7:30 this is why doctors of the poisoned Russian agent couldn't detect the source of a poisoning for a week, until they started doing alpha-spectrometry. There is a great read on that, google "inquiry into Litvinenko poisoning" Also, are they delivering to Russia?

  • @tiporari
    @tiporari4 жыл бұрын

    Fantastic experiments. Seems obvious once you've seen it, but it never ocurred to me to use ionizing radiation as an arc initiator. Great stuff! Love to see this with a plasma globe, or some light emitting gas under extrmemly low pressure.

  • @themonkeymoo
    @themonkeymoo4 жыл бұрын

    I love that one of the electrodes is clearly a guitar string

  • @xcofcd
    @xcofcd4 жыл бұрын

    Now I know exactly what Saul Goodman was crushing in these smoke detectors and how they work...

  • @HaydenHatTrick

    @HaydenHatTrick

    4 жыл бұрын

    That scene got me upset because he pretty much guaranteed himself cancer

  • @SafetyLucas

    @SafetyLucas

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@HaydenHatTrick Maybe he can start a meth empire if Cinnabon doesn't work out.

  • @cappuccino3444

    @cappuccino3444

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@HaydenHatTrick smoke detectors only emit alpha radiation which cannot penetrate human skin. The only realistic way for it to harm you is by eating it

  • @HaydenHatTrick

    @HaydenHatTrick

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@cappuccino3444 or breathing it. The fact is he got it all over his cloths and body. He then didn't go home right away, therefore introducing the dust into the guy's house. Then risking any dust blow up during the day from the stunt. Then he probably gets in his car to go somewhere. Even if he goes straight home, when does he put his cloths in the wash? Does he have a shower right away? Honestly, I don't imagine many scenarios where he doesn't inhale it or ingest it once he got it all over himself like that.

  • @cappuccino3444

    @cappuccino3444

    4 жыл бұрын

    @@HaydenHatTrick Oh I haven't seen the clip I just assumed there would be a solid lump in there. Dust is cancer for sure

  • @944play
    @944play4 жыл бұрын

    I seem to remember a Staticmaster or equivalent nuke-dusting brush in my college photo lab, and I'm almost POSITIVE it claimed to work through the magic of THORIUM. Any concurrence?

  • @T3sl4

    @T3sl4

    4 жыл бұрын

    Is thorium even hot enough to do anything?

  • @DanBader

    @DanBader

    4 жыл бұрын

    Um... I'm old enough to have used thorium in high school physics to make shadow cast photos on photo paper. I wouldn't want a whole lot of thorium in my darkroom.

  • @dontaskme9047

    @dontaskme9047

    4 жыл бұрын

    You were probably more positive than you realize since the brush ripped away your electrons.

  • @nefariumxxx

    @nefariumxxx

    4 жыл бұрын

    Nope, you just confused the two.

  • @pierre8588
    @pierre85884 жыл бұрын

    Hi! Thanks for this awesome video! Side comment as to why the Geiger counter detects your strontium sample - Beta decay is almost always accompanied by (secondary) gamma radiation, as it is a way for the daughter atom to release extra energy from the transformation. Alpha decay can also be accompanied by gamma radiation.

  • @Momfasa
    @Momfasa4 жыл бұрын

    Wow, just wow! Thanks for this video!

Келесі