I want 'Thus spoke Zarathustra' next part. ❤

Fun Fact: There are multiple definitions of the English word 'Religion'...so the question is: What is YOUR definition of that word?

@MRRGEGAMER

Ай бұрын

Religion = restriction

@priyanshubarot6582

Ай бұрын

Ye karlo pehle

@joysonbaretto3690

Ай бұрын

Belief system is a good term to use

@pratibhaMourya-kb7iw

Ай бұрын

Hame pata hai is comment scetion ka prayog healthy talk ke lie hona chaheye lakin Ham baar baar ek he chij puchete hai Bhaiya kya aap kabhe women philosopher ke baare me nahi bataige kya????😢

@KingOfGamesss

Ай бұрын

@@joysonbaretto3690 ...not interested in terms...but direct answers to direct questions is awesome

Honestly your videos are amezing. I have watched some English philosophy videos prior but the problem with them is, their native English accent is difficult to understand for me. So I used to lost interest in the middle. But even if it's English, I like to listen to Indian youtubers. Their accent is so comfortable to listen. Thanks for the video

@rencevakkachan2284

Ай бұрын

Read Continental philosophy it also depends but i think from generally it is easy to absorb than anaylatical

Subscribed ✨🤗

video on nihilistic feedback loop. plz

Please make a separate video for nihilistic feedback loop

Nihilism suggests that all beliefs and values are ultimately subjective and arbitrary, and that there is no objective truth or value in the world. Therefore, it is inherently personal, and one cannot label someone else as nihilistic. Furthermore, if someone believes they are nihilistic, they are paradoxically acknowledging their belief in something, which contradicts the essence of nihilism itself.

@Melodiousvoicess

25 күн бұрын

Bro phir aise yoh duniya mai koi nihlist nhi hai

Here are my attempts to answer the two questions posed in your video: 1. "Can we safely say that religion comes out from an instant of time which is nihilistic in nature?" It's difficult to definitively state that religion arose directly out of an initial nihilistic state. The passage describes a hypothetical scenario where people first experienced a "nihilistic gap" or loss of belief systems after confronting events that shattered their existing beliefs. It suggests religion may have emerged as a new belief system to fill that nihilistic void. However, the origins of religion are complex and multi-faceted. While nihilism may have played a role by creating a need for new meaning, other factors like our human tendency to find patterns, the desire to explain natural phenomena, and the advantages of social cohesion likely also contributed to the rise of religious beliefs and practices. So while an instant of nihilism may have occasionally catalyzed the formation of new religions in certain contexts, it seems an oversimplification to say all religion emerged directly "out of" a purely nihilistic state. The reality was likely more nuanced. 2. "Does believing in one idea and not believing in another mean that we are always in a nihilistic [state]?" No, simply holding one belief while rejecting another does not necessarily imply being in a nihilistic state. Nihilism involves a rejection of all beliefs and meaning - a complete skepticism toward value systems. When a Christian rejects the beliefs of Islam, or vice versa, they are not rejecting the entire notion of religious belief itself. They still maintain positive beliefs about their own religion's tenets while disbelieving others. This is not nihilism, but rather an affirmation of certain beliefs over others. Questioning specific beliefs while still maintaining an overall system of meaning and value is part of the human experience. It does not automatically reduce one to a nihilistic state of complete meaninglessness and denial of all value judgments. So in essence, the mere act of believing some ideas but not others is not inherently nihilistic. It is when one rejects all beliefs and systems of deriving meaning that true nihilism arises.

@LalBal-hu5fv

Ай бұрын

Its looks like you have a nice skill to breakdown or describe a topic properly. I have some questions It will be great if you talk to me and create them. If you gimi permission the I would like to talk in Insta

@preetamrawat4939

25 күн бұрын

@@LalBal-hu5fv Sorry bro I don't have insta. I can give you my discord id we can talk there.

What I think on first question is that, "The relationship between nihilism and religion is more nuanced and dynamic, with various philosophical, cultural, and historical factors shaping their interactions and developments over time. Both concepts continue to evolve and influence human thought and behavior in complex ways. So yeah, we can say that first the Nihilism came and then Religion came." and on second question, "Believing in one ideology over another can simply reflect a preference or alignment with certain beliefs, principles, or values that resonate with the individual. And in case of believing in one deity over another simply reflects a specific religious belief or affiliation rather than nihilism. It's a matter of religious faith rather than philosophical nihilism. People may have various reasons for adhering to one religious belief system over another, including cultural upbringing, personal experiences, or theological convictions." So yeah that's just my point and I know it has some flaw but yeah that's what I came up with.

@harsh-on-lost-boat

Ай бұрын

May I ask which "interactions" (philosophical, cultural, historical) between religion and nihilism are you talking about?

23:115 Did you imagine that We created you without any purpose, and that you will not be brought back to Us?"

@elegantlyradha

Ай бұрын

Yes purpose of man in his 50s to r**e ayesha in her 9 year old

great sir

Very Nice. Sir app live debate karte he atheism par .aghar app karna chahate he plz reply kare.thanks

In last vdo I asked u I've read Sophie's world.... what to read after this ...... u didn't reply

One person who is muslim and one who is hindu (example). Both should respect each other religion ki during there nihilistic stage they find meaning in that. Aur also have trust on that person ki vo koi text ko literally nahi lega and also he must put it into todays context.... And know ki humanity is above all.. And that ki we have made this systems to just fave the unknown and derive power from our ancistors story

How should a beginner approach philosophy ? How should I start with learning about more concepts

@user-ws7wt9fg8v

Ай бұрын

just question everything with you and around you. try to know it source

Please make a video on the psychology of extremism in some other religions and why Humans are not able to realise the evil of their ideology? Btw people are still killed for blasphemy in some countries

plz make vdo on free will vs predestination

1) NO I see it this way. From primitive belief systems evolving to polytheism to monotheism, the concept of divine entity has gotten more abstract. Now, nothing can get more abstract than this. It's almost the final stage of divine entity and meaning people "attached" to it. Thus, the fall of religion in West consequentially meant nihilism. Let's return to East, Buddhist thought was nihilist in some sense. If given above, nihilism of rejecting surroundings/materialistic life has evolved to nihilism of rejecting meaning, morality etc. I personally don't think religion came out of preexisting nihilistic stage. The other factors were main driving forces, it may have incorporated some aspects of nihilism - that emerged from society itself. Example : Greek/Roman philosophy influence on Christianity. Thus, nihilistic character existed in collective thought /belief of society that was absorbed by religion. By this assumption, nihilism existed all along. We humans seek meaning and rebel meaning at the same time. It's innate biological feature perhaps. So think of religion and it's evolution as a map, where the collective thought of society has projected meaning onto the map as ideas themselves became more abstract. Collective thought itself has nihilistic character. 2) NO Belief itself means to consider those "religious assertion" as bedrock, to never question or reason them. Academic Theology in different traditions have attempted to rationalize their religion and how world operates inside the framework of those beliefs. Again let's generalize the question beyond religion to any ideology. Here the question gets interesting with NO CLEAR ANSWER. _My ideology X is inconsistent with other ideology Y. Some assertion in X are right and some in Y are right. How shall I update my ideas to make it consistent? Could it be possible that Y is right given some corrections made to it? Or we both are wrong?_ Unlike a belief system with believers, an ideology has thinkers. Those thinkers try to remove illogical underpinnings of their ideology - by evidence, reasoning, debating etc. Now let's get to world's most successful ideology - that is not even an ideology! It's science or scientific world view. Before returning to question, Karl Popper, a philosopher of science, put forward concept of **falsifiability** or "trying to prove something false". In scientific research, scientists constantly try to test their theories in seek of better one. In other words, trying to challenge/falsify the theories. In this manner, science doesn't at all have nihilist character - because it assumes there exists a truth (like theory of everything) that one day we will eventually reach. Going against my last paragraph, given "falsifiability" science may incorporate "epistemological nihilism". For example... ~ What if universe is too complex that human civilization will never be able to understand it? ~ Do we assume that given there is final theory of everything implying our our current knowledge is false? So for 2nd question, if applied to beyond religion, answer is NEITHER YES OR NO.

@harsh-on-lost-boat

Ай бұрын

SOMEONE ASKED TO WRITE IN HINDI... AS WELL 1) नहीं... मैं इसे इस तरह से देखता हूँ। primitive belief systems से लेकर polytheism से monotheism तक... ईश्वर/भगवान का concept abstract होता रहा है। अब, इससे ज़्यादा abstract कुछ नहीं हो सकता। यह लगभग आख़री stage है - ईश्वर/भगवान (divine being) का और अर्थ (meaning) का, जिन दोनों को लोगो ने जोड़ कर रखा है। इसलिए, पश्चिम (west) में धर्म का पतन nihilism के उदय में ही हुआ। वहीं पूर्व (east) में भी बौद्ध विचार में कुछ nihilistic विशेषता/प्रवृत्ति भी देखने मिलती है। हम ऊपर देखते हैं - वो प्रकार का nihilism जिसमे हम अपने आस-पास (surroundings) को या materialistic चीज़ों को reject करते है... बदल जाता है.... उस nihilism में जिसमे हम और भी abstract चीज़ो को reject करने लग जाते हैं जैसे नैतिकता (morality) और meaning (अर्थ/मकसद)। मैं व्यक्तिगत रूप से धर्म को पूर्व मौजूदा nihilistic stage से बाहर नहीं आया मानता हूँ। अन्य कारण (factors) रहे होंगे हर धर्म के विकास में जहाँ धर्म ने ही समाज (society) से उन nihilistic विषेशता को absorb किया या अपना लिया हो। उदाहरण: यूनानी(Greek)/रोमन(Roman) philosophy का ईसाई धर्म पर प्रभाव। इस प्रकार nihilistic विषेशता तो पहले से ही मौजूद थी, सामूहिक विचार/मान्यता (collective thought/belief) में जिसे बाद में धार्मिक मान्यताओं ने स्वीकार (accept) कर लिया। अगर हम इसे सही माने तो फिर nihilism तो हमेशा से था। बल्कि हम इंसान "अर्थ / मकसद (meaning) की खोज" और "अर्थ / मकसद (meaning) का विरोध" एक ही वक़्त पर करते हैं। शायद ये एक जैविक/प्राकृतिक खूबी है। धर्म और इसके विकास को, आप तुलनात्मक रूप से, एक नक्शा (map) के रूप में सोचें, जहां सामाजिक विचार (collective thought) ने विचारों के अर्थ / मकसद (meaning) को उस नक़्शे (map) में परियोजित किया... जैसे-जैसे विचार खुद ज़्यादा abstract हो गए। इसलिए मुझे लगता है... सामूहिक विचार (collective thought) में nihilism स्वयं मौजूद है। 2) नहीं... "आस्था" (belief) शब्द से ही यह स्पष्ट हो जाता है कि उन "धार्मिक दावों" (religious assertions) को मूल्यशिक्षा माना जाये, कभी प्रश्न नहीं किया जाए या न ही कारण पूछे जाये। विभिन्न परंपराओं में शैक्षिक धर्मशास्त्र (academic theology) ने अपने धर्म और आस्था को तार्किक बनाने का प्रयास किया है - कि वह इस दुनिया के अंतर्गत काम कैसे करता है? अब चलें ले इस सवाल को और भी सामान्यीकरण (generalize) किया जाये। धर्म से उठकर कोई भी विचारधारा को इसके घेरे में परखें। यहाँ पर सवाल और भी मज़ेदार हो जाता है क्यूंकि इसका कोई "स्पष्ट उत्तर" (clear answer) ही नहीं। चलिए माने _मेरी धारणा X किसी और धारणा Y के साथ असंगत (inconsistent) है। X में कुछ दावे सही हैं और Y में कुछ सही हैं। मैं अपने विचारों को संगत (consistent) बनाने के लिए उन्हें कैसे सुधार करूं? क्या यह संभव है कि Y सही है अगर इसमें कुछ सुधार किया जाए तो? या फिर हम दोनों ही गलत हैं?_ वही जहाँ मान्यता (belief) के साथ मानने-वाले (believers) होते है, उसी प्रकार एक विचारधारा (ideology) में विचारक (thinkers) होते हैं। उन विचारकों की कोशिश होती है कि उनकी धारणा में "अतार्किक आधार" (illogical underpinning) को हटाया जाये - प्रमाण, तर्क, बहस आदि के द्वारा। अब चलिए... दुनिया की सबसे सफल विचारधारा का चिंतन करें - जो कि वास्तव में एक विचारधारा भी नहीं है! यह विज्ञान (science) या वैज्ञानिक दृष्टिकोण (scientific worldview) है। सवाल पर लौटने से पहले... कार्ल पॉपर (Karl Popper), एक विज्ञान के दार्शनिक (philosopher of science), ने "falsifiability" या "हर assertion को गलत साबित करने का प्रयास" के concept की प्रस्तुति की। वैज्ञानिक शोध (scientific research) में, वैज्ञानिक निरंतर अपने सिद्धांतों (theories) का परीक्षण (testing) करने की कोशिश करते हैं। अन्यथा कहें तो, सिद्धांतों का चुनौतीपूर्वक (challenge) परीक्षण करने / गलत (falsify) साबित का प्रयास करते हैं। इस प्रकार, विज्ञान में कोई भी nihilism नहीं है - क्योंकि यह मानता है कि एक सच है (One Single Scientific Truth exists)... जैसे कि सब कुछ का सिद्धांत (Theory of Everything) ... जिसे एक दिन भविष्य में हम अंततः प्राप्त करेंगे। मेरे पिछले paragraph के विपरीत, "falsifiability" को ध्यान में रखते हुए, यह भी कहा जा सकता है ... विज्ञान "ज्ञान-शून्यता" (epistemological nihilism) के कुछ पहलुओं (principles) को अपने में शामिल कर सकती है। उदाहरण के लिए... ~ क्या ब्रह्मांड (universe) इतना complex है कि मानव सभ्यता हमेशा इसे समझने में असमर्थ (incapable) रहेगी? ~ क्या हम मानते हैं कि अगर एक "सबकुछ का सिद्धांत" (Theory of Everything) है, तो इसका अर्थ है की हमारे वर्तमान ज्ञान (current understanding of universe) गलत है? इसलिए दूसरे सवाल के लिए, यदि धर्म के पार विचार किया जाए, तो उत्तर "हां" - "नहीं" दोनों नहीं है।

Subscribe kardiya bro😊😊❤

Great

The first question : Do all religions have come from nihilistic state? We can not say when was the first person born because Sanatan dharma says, the world has existed a very long time ago and it has continued to existed again and again, if we agree on the above line then we are not considering the existing of the world 1400 years or 1600 whatever according to Islam and 2000 or 2500 years ago the world existed according to Christians. So, all religions came into existence due to nihilism? this question brings another question when was the first person born? what were his thoughts? did that person even knew the place he is living is his home? or what is home?, do i need god? what is god? what is good or wrong? why the person is born? Now if we considered this questions then we can say the person didn't had any belief or any intellectual and was there seeing around and merely knowing he is living according to logical conclusion but then if we see every religion and their claim for superiority of claiming the title we are the oldest is on going for everywhere. Let's say sanatan has the oldest book i.e. Rigveda known to human kind, my question is what was before the book, what was earlier then we have verbal knowledge transfer from one person to another about human life and God so if we say God, when was the existence of the word God or religion. Now it is something we can only think of because we can't get the answer by people that we had earlier because they are religious people. So the proper answer to this question is based on existence of mankind and the first thoughts they had because if their isn't any life then how would we know what has happened, humans need religion animals doesn't need it. The existence of life with a intellect is a must to know the origin of religion because concluding answering to such as a question will be a fallacy because we don't know the existence we just know what is written or what has been said to us. The second question :Muslim believing in Islam and not believing in Christianity does make him nihilist and wise versa fir Christian, Hindu, every other religion? From Pov of each other both are just existing and not living the life by knowing Allah or Jesus or not realizing the love for God. The answer to this question i won't say is nihilistic but a inferior feeling against each other is their. Love is dead among each other establishment of superior God is a ongoing fight between both so i would rather say every person belonging any religion considers himself better than because of the religious perks, benefits. I maybe wrong but the question is about one person believing into something and believing into something does make him nihilist i would say no because nihilist doesn't have a believe system but here we are taking about two religion's. Please let me know if I'm wrong and if anyone is reading this than thankyou so much for your time.

@harsh-on-lost-boat

Ай бұрын

Interestingly what you pose in first part is anthropological and biological in nature. Your question indirectly translates to "When did consciousness first emerge? And what happened after that?" [1] While still debatable, the researchers have found "ritualistic behaviors" (not religious behavior) in animals that might explain something like "proto-religion". Then proto-religion predates evolution of Homo Sapiens. [2] Next origin of language, different bird species, whales, insects, primates are known to communicate by natural sounds, gestures, body language etc. very much like us humans without a proper language. Thus language evolved as result of interaction within animal social behavior. Note language is closer to thought as it helps express them. [3] The evolutionary perspective suggests that consciousness evolved gradually, starting with simple behaviors in unicellular organisms. Basic behaviors, such as sensing and responding to stimuli, predate nervous systems and evolved over billions of years. Nervous systems enabled organisms to regulate behavior more flexibly, leading to the emergence of consciousness. _"we don't know the existence we just know what is written or what has been said to us"_ What if we consider above empirical scientific evidence? [1] Proto-religion [2] Origin of Language [3] Emergence of Consciousness I think one can conclude answers.

6:43 I don't know Much about philosophy. But whenever We use The Word God. It points our focus Towards a certain Direction. A Image of a Being more Precisely anything that this word is Connected to an Individual comes In our Mind.And One Cannot Imagine that they don't know of. So,by following this Line of Thinking 1.If one say God Exist. Then They are referring to that Image of The Entity or Whatever they mean by God can Be fulfilled by something. 2.If one say God Doesn't exist.Then they mean whatever The Image They Hold Of God. Couldn't be matched by Something. But they Believe in That Image. So Can't it be Like that God Exist and those Who don't believe it don't have Enough Knowledge or experience about what They are talking about. Or have unrealistic imagination 😂. Jokes aside Who believe that God doesn't exist believes That Whatever don't Exist is God. And then When They Die they Don't go anywhere.Means They Are where they Believe God is. Maybe God is What you think God is.

Nahilism is a state between confusion and belief.😮

According to your definition of Nihilism, it's inevitable in every human.

1-->Well, if you are pre assuming that religion came due to nihilism at some point in history, it just means that the religion is MADE UP to cope with that nihilism, then the entire argument is vague . There has to be a set definition of religion. Lets say that religion is basically a belief in God or some supernatural power which is cause of all causes and behind this creation. So, if that is true then nihilism at this level disappears right, and yes assuming religion emerged solely as a response to nihilism oversimplifies the complex historical, cultural, and various deeper factors that contributed to the development of religious beliefs and practices.

@harsh-on-lost-boat

Ай бұрын

Exactly, I think misunderstanding arises from this point. People often argue the lack or void of meaning in life compels individuals to take refugee in some religious belief. Now, that alone can apply to some individuals. And might not to society historically at large. Forget religion. Even we if say transition of one belief system to another undergoes a "nihilistic state" - it's too subjective in my opinion. It undergoes "paradigm shift" for sure. Although I would prefer more clarification on meaning of experiencing "nihilistic state".

@runajain5773

17 күн бұрын

​@@harsh-on-lost-boatyeh like Jewish and parsis also resistance against other religious or other belief systems if you know history of Islam you found that in pre Islam religion the way Islamic scholars discriped that how pre Islamic religion fail where slavery is normal religion gathering is stupid party so you can Islam very nilistist against pre Islamic society same other religions

Saying that Christian don't believe in what Islam preaches and All religion contradicts with each that proves moral nihilism is a bad answer. It's like an anarchist asking that I believe in one less system.

Bhai tameez k dayre mee rehke nhi bolenge toh kya hoga please tell bahut curious hu😔☝

@DesiPhilosopher748

24 күн бұрын

Khud soch aiso k saath kya hona chahiye?

Convert free will till Divine Will

Shabd ❎ Shabd ✅

Hi, I enjoyed watching your video. There is one thing I would like to point out, 14:02 you said that our country is not moving towards modernization, and our country is like a bird in a cage. But the way you said it seemed that you want us to accept the western world. My question is why are you conveying that we can't grow because of our culture I am sure their is a way to do both. Also, their many problems with the western world, by that I don't mean we should turn blind to our problem. Despite that I love your videos.

All things apart why is the name desi philosopher. As what's desi in philosophy??.

@DesiPhilosopher748

Ай бұрын

The method of articulation

@Neuraltrades

Ай бұрын

@@DesiPhilosopher748 Well articulation might be misleading cause philosophy translate to search for wisdom and specifying oneself to a particular ID sounds more counter intuitive to the fundamentals. You know it just forwards an traditional “Akhand ” type symbol.

India is the best example of a modern state with religion and cultural cohesion... being modern doesn't mean leaving your Dharma or culture

@unknown_5107

Ай бұрын

Keep boost your ego.

@sdsanyal372

Ай бұрын

Dhrama kind of Drama, business of fear

@CrazyPanda.000

25 күн бұрын

​@@sdsanyal372You are not educationally qualified at this point if you think dharma is for fear, dharma talks ultimate reality which you certainly lack to understand

Bro. How can i grow my beard like you. I'm 22 and still not getting thick beard.

@princekumaryadav1932

29 күн бұрын

@@JayDadhich897 it's a genuine problem bro. Kisse puchhu?

Let me tell, hum sab logo ko modernization ke taraf roke ja raha hai wo hai diversity we are surrounded by different people's different religions ppls and different belives, in foreign countries jyda se jyda 1-2 religion aur fir ek religion east side dusra west side in masses. Aur as in religion unmai conflict nahi hota but in india different ppls different religions so different philosophies and tark-vitark aur i am glad i born in india, sabse stable ab india he country hai usa mai dekhlo lgbtq wars, uk mai dekh lo conflict but india in my pov stable hai aur jo jo countries modernization ke taraf gayi hai unki halat dekh lo, hamara divine and historical culture he hai jo hume bacha raha hai thanks alot to Shri Krishna,allah, Jesus, gurunank. Jay shree Krishna 🙏

@unknownboy7723

Ай бұрын

Religious conflict to hr country m hote h except countries like N. Korea jidhr god 1 hi h aur koi against jata hai to god use punish krta h.

@multinogaming07

Ай бұрын

@@unknownboy7723 there's human god, KIM JONG UN, waha ke log uss environment mai comfortable ho chuke hai agar wo india rahe 1-2 month aur wapas korea jaye to unko korea ka environment toxic lagega, un logo ko pata he nahi freedom hoti hai kya actual mai they are comfortable in their environment

Beautiful work lots of love and support, new subscriber bro ❤❤❤❤

Hey bro I'm now admired with Fedrick baba

Nice and best video and thank 🌺🌺

[QUESTION] There is something that makes us valuable or gives us essence. For example, we use a pen until its ink runs out, then we discard it. The ink is what gives the pen essence or value. Without the ink, the pen loses its meaning and is thrown away. Similarly, there must be something within us that we should cultivate so that we gain value or essence. But what is that thing that gives us value or essence? I think our essence is of two types - outer and inner. For the outer world, the essence is material things like money and possessions. A poor person is often discarded by society, so in the outer world, material wealth is seen as the essence. For the inner world, the essence is morality and ethics. A person who lacks morality and does immoral things ends up discarding their own self-worth. The outer essence (material) and inner essence (moral/spiritual) can affect each other. A saint may lack material wealth (outer essence) but have great spirituality (inner essence). A rich person may have material wealth but lack inner moral essence. If someone loses their outer material essence, they can become depressed or cynical, resulting in a loss of inner moral essence too. If someone loses their inner moral essence, like becoming greedy, they may squander their material wealth, losing the outer essence. But if someone loses both the outer material essence and the inner moral/spiritual essence, what is left? Then what would give meaning or justification to that person's existence? If we strip away money, possessions, ethics and spirituality, what core essence remains that makes human life truly valuable?

@raskolnikov7034

Ай бұрын

Morality and ethics is different for different people

I think the first question answer is yes and the second question answer is no

@DesiPhilosopher748

Ай бұрын

Second part post ka question nahi hai :)

❤❤

❤

Make a video on j krishnamurti

Bro upload that register kro scam over here

@DesiPhilosopher748

Ай бұрын

Naa bro Faraz Khan vale channel pe upload krunga, idhr bss philosophy

Do hi chzen ho skti hain ya to Ye kainat ye insan khud bna hai yaani khud hi apna Khuda hai ya phir ye kisi ne bnaya hai agr to ye qainat ya insaan khud hi khuda hai to Khuda ko maut nhi aaskti jbke insaano ke hth ma uski apni mait bhi nahi hai hmen nhi pta kb hmen maut ajani hai aur kab ye qainat khtm ho jani hai to jis shkhs ke control ma khud ki jaan hi na ho kya wo khuda hoskta hai? iska mtlb hmari jaan aur kul kainaat kisi ke control ma hai air whi to khuda hai aur yhi hmaari fitrat hai

Ap mufti yasir wajidi se debate kro

❤❤❤

Good quality content

Only two possible philosophies come into play when defining the meaning of life: Islam or Nihilism. Apart from Islam, believing in fighting for something beyond mere survival-whether it is freedom, truth, ego, or peace-in the name of nationalism, secularism, religion, or race, could all be considered illusions. These are vagaries of perception and temporary constructions of feeble human intellects trying desperately to justify their existence, which is viewed as lacking meaning and purpose. Nonetheless, humans persist in their pursuits, often resulting in conflicts and threats to humanity in the form of war and genocide.

Think about your opinion about this...Why did God create the earth and world?

I dont like to read i just attract to curious ideas thinking

Mere khayal se 1 cheez pe bhi vishwas hone se nihilism khatam ho jati hai

Nope i donot thinnk so, Rejection of something is not Nihilism. It is just outright rejection, it's just uou want to escape from something which may/not be true, which is giving you an ICK by being against of your belief, challanging the established authorities, authorities estd. & recognized by you only. that would be a form of EScapism, a form of Philosophical suicide. its just not getting out of comfort zone, sitting on cliff & not jumping & embracing the Abysss, or you are resorting on iCEberg so much so that it will take you to your destination & wherever its taking thAT WOULD BeMY DESTINATION. NIhilism is jumping in that ocean, jumping from the cliff despite all natal desires to be loved ,to be comforted, to resort, to capture the moment, to fix everything, and BE safe BE sound BE secure, that manifest dilectically in accepting a faith [A], albeit rejecting some other faith [not A]. nihilism is the solutionn of that dilectic, that paradox, being THE THIRD WAY

mai shyd isi time period me nipat jaunga 😢

Thats why agnostic atheism.

Please Share your personal philosophy abt life also, and are you also an atheist?

@Sami02

Ай бұрын

he has already made a video on his personal philosophy

In my opinion Religion is very very imp in india as well as the world because it gives the ideal way to live a life or to live a society if everyone understand and know that there's is no god and these belief is just waste and just made up by ancient people and no sense then violence,murder,crime,thief,rape is become common because not every one is bhagat singh in this world because if someone only pray God , worshipped, not break rule , give all respect,and help people because he/she afraid of god ,think that god is watching us we go to hell and not heaven but when he/she understand god are not Present in this world then they forget and become rebellion and when they become rebellion then every thing is destroyed b/c human kill human , human become racist to other human, humans not setting with other human ,human make fun of other human, some human are god to other human, human worshipped other human, human make weapons to fear other human, every human is different from other human , some human are get best facilities but some are not ,some human are poor but but all human are same by only there consciousness and consciousness is god and I watched a interview of elon musk he say that he always wonder in child that what is meaning Of life and god and he said we can't understand because our technology is not that much to understand what is consciousness If we fully understand about our consciousness then maybe we can say god is present or not . Human are only have limited memory, intelligence , physical strength to understand who is god because in future these all things are more advance in Ai or humaniod robot but they only don't have conciousnes and that thing I think is god and thats why we say that inside us we all Present God and evil but we have to find out it inside not outside b/c 5 senses are not able to find God/ understand God But but Some understanding people become atheist like bhagat singh and know we Have make hard work for ourself there no one came to help me then they are god of him self to improve the life of himself and can that lead to improve in technology sector ,space sector and about every sector and give boost to figure

@Xulqar-nain

Ай бұрын

💯

Quality is immense...

How does Sanatan dharm see Nihilism??

@forrreal.

Ай бұрын

The nihilism is shunyatavaad ani nairatmyavaad in Buddhism

empathise

Bhai yr hindi m bhi likha kro sab cool banne k chakkar m English jhaad dete h bss.

Ray brassiere nihil unbound

9:17 exmuslim sahil se Islamic philosophy pe debate kr....🤣🤣 Tumne Islam ko criticise hi nhi kia Jo bilkul intolerant he.... apostasy Islam me allow nhi he...India me charvaka philosophy h jo nhi manti existence of God ko....yhi farq he....tumhare or humare me....

please make a video on ADVAIT VEDANTA!!!!

15:51 U r wrong that we are totally blank slate at birth we have ancestral evolutionary memory about our past.

@DesiPhilosopher748

Ай бұрын

If you would have gone through the whole lecture (before commenting 'wrong') there was a word used which is 'PHENOMENOLOGY' We are not talking about DNA data trails or evolutionary blueprints, both of them are different things

@narendrasomawat5978

Ай бұрын

​@@DesiPhilosopher748I'm taking about blank slate theory of John Locke that we learn everything from calture. 'Nebutalarasa'.

@narendrasomawat5978

Ай бұрын

​@@DesiPhilosopher748what's your opinion about Jordan Peterson?

@Anshu-qy6pv

Ай бұрын

You are right, we have it in our DNA but it decides that what we would look like and how do we grow.... that's not something that we are concious of when we born..

@narendrasomawat5978

Ай бұрын

​​@@Anshu-qy6pvno it's not just about physical growth it's also about our spiritual, caltural, polical growth I'm not hardcore determinerist but I think social construct, state of nature or blank slate theory which is propagated by liberal or leftist thinker is highly wrong. This guy is talking about that blank slate theory.

Well i wanna debate u. Bhagat singh ji astik the. Unke guru bhi

@TheStrangerGamer7

Ай бұрын

bhai unhone khud ko nastik kaha tha

@zazaid3462

Ай бұрын

Are you high on something 😂 bhagat singh literally wrote a book titled "why I am an atheist"

@kafka1343

Ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂claim need evidence not gapod

Kabhi puri tarah chup baith ke dekha hai. Yek bar kar ke dekh hi lo aur mujhe bhi batana, kya pata chala.

Gayan ka bhandar

Bhai I want to see your podcast with Kushal Mehra of Charvaka podcast he is awesome dude Philosophy me bhi tagda hai hit him up tumdono ka convo mst hoga.

आपकी भाषा समझ में नहीं आता है,या तो पुरी हिंदी में समझाये या English me

Nihilism isn't a philosophy it's state. And beliefs have evolved read Jordan Peterson maps of meaning how beliefs have evolved.

@beast5912

Ай бұрын

Kisi state ko jab articulate kroge toh vo philosophy hi bann jaati hai bhai!

@narendrasomawat5978

Ай бұрын

​@@beast5912no it's like saying happiness is a philosophy.

@beast5912

Ай бұрын

@@narendrasomawat5978 Obviously it is a philosophy? Wth do you think it is? A pretty lady with red dress? Seems you are just commenting to keep your point across without understanding what you are trying to say! Also liking your own comment 🥲

@narendrasomawat5978

Ай бұрын

​@@beast5912😂. It's not philosophy it's state of society or individual.

Abe I challenge you to do "Kakaradi Kali sahasranam" in the Chaitra Navratri. With Gud and red dress to kali ma. And rest we'll discuss later.

I am a hindu but still watches

Length Kam karo

❤❤

Make a video on j krishnamurti

@sajid279

Ай бұрын

J krishnamurthi was a non-dualist philosopher... Non- dualism has its own advantage and it's own limitations philosophically

@aaaahdead

Ай бұрын

@@sajid279 true but it would be great if he makes a video around his philoshophy

❤❤

Make a video on j krishnamurti