Please watch to the end. I really want to know your answer to the questions.

@ThisIsNotADrell

5 ай бұрын

Perhaps someone will help us make it first?

@Sarjanafm

5 ай бұрын

Thank For Uploading

@WilliamDye-willdye

5 ай бұрын

At 16:35 the closed-caption currently reads "A photon is composed of..." when it's describing a proton. Not a big deal, but since it's in the captions, is there a way to fix it post-release?

@JustAnotherCommenter

5 ай бұрын

_Are TSC-1, TSC, TSC+1 and everyone else the same person?_ I believe that all the TSCs are the same person, even though it only looks like TSC-1, TSC, and TSC+1 are the only same people, and that the others (TSC-2, TSC-inf, TSC+2, TSC+inf) are different people from other universes. The singularity connects multiple universes, so it connects multiple TSCs with different consciousnesses but are technically the same people in different time periods inside (TSC, TSC-1, TSC-2, etc.) AND outside (TSC+1, TSC+2, etc.) the singularity. _Who came to singularity "first"?_ I also believe that nobody was a true "first" to the singularity. The others TSCs came from other universes, right? If we're talking about TSCs in the same universe, then the future TSC (TSC-1) definitely "arrived first" even though he had already been there from the previous time loop. But that's the intuitive answer. Come to think of it, they "arrived" at the same time in the same universe, as TSC-1 seems to come out of nowhere (although we know he came from a different universe) already standing in the singularity, and TSC has just finished falling from the inner horizon. _How did he do it without help?_ TSC always had help from a future TSC in every single universe. Imagine TSC+inf, he would've received help from TSC+inf-1. There is no universe that he made it all the way to the black hole without help. And even if there is, it would be a totally different reality. _Is it destined for TSC to safely arrive singularity?_ TSC is living in a universe without freewill, as he is stuck in a big Bootstrap and Predestination Paradox. Therefore, yes. _Will we make it? Or did we make it?_ I don't think this question is answerable rn....

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Great catch!@@WilliamDye-willdye Unfortunately no. I will collect a set of corrections/new discoveries and pin them later.

"Will we make it? Or did we make it?" completely changed the way I think of theories, this is mindblowing!

@qhelios

5 ай бұрын

I know, right? It's fascinating how the video portrays the concept of universes being connected by each and individual black holes.

@cewla3348

5 ай бұрын

@@qhelios it's actually einstien-rosen bridges which are properly good and functional theories for black holes (wormholes)

@6lack5ushi

5 ай бұрын

the factory that built the factory....

In case someone didn't catch it, when TSC waves his cowboy hat while riding a rocket into the black hole, it's an homage to the ending of the movie "Doctor Strangelove". Also, I'm surprised there were no references to spherical cows (unless I missed it). They even had a cowboy hat to go with it.

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Awesome! This is my culture blind spot.

@JaneXemylixa

5 ай бұрын

Exactly! We have a perfectly frictionless surface, so where are all the spherical cows??

@JoshRiolu

5 ай бұрын

@@JaneXemylixa Depends on whether or not he initially landed on a milk planet, I suppose...

@chanhenglizhonghuass3251

5 ай бұрын

The scene where he enters the hydrogen electron orbital is a reference to another Stanley Kubrick film, 2001 a space odyssey

@JaneXemylixa

5 ай бұрын

@@chanhenglizhonghuass3251 Every wormhole travel scene ever is a reference to that somehow. The man just about codified it xD

I think the white flash in the beginning was the portal from Animation vs Math. I think that Euler tried to send TSC home but it instead sent him to the physics world.

@warriorsabe1792

5 ай бұрын

My thought too. Now, which world did the einstein-rosen bridge through type iia superstring theory go to?

@bluecrayfish2081

5 ай бұрын

@@warriorsabe1792 Maybe chemistry.

@InstinctDynamite

5 ай бұрын

Damn this is so thoughtfully interesting ❤️🔥

@Pickled_Poet

4 ай бұрын

​@@warriorsabe1792 Alan mentioned creating a whole Animation v. Education series, so it could be opening to the large educational multiverse

I view the story of Animation vs. Physics as essentially a bootstrap paradox. The effects of the events of AvP's story are ultimately the events' own causes. The original Terminator film, when viewed outside the rest of it's franchise, is an example of a bootstrap paradox. Kyle Reese was sent back in time to save the mother of humanity's resistance leader before the titular machine can assassinate her, and Kyle ends up conceiving said resistance leader with this woman. The effects of the past are ultimately their own cause. Trying to trace these events back to a definitive origin point will trap you in this time loop, because this time loop has no specific cause which created it. Similarly, AvP is a time loop where TSC is a helped by a future version of themselves to reach where the future TSC is, who in turn, teaches the present TSC how to help their past self. It's a bootstrap paradox: the events are self-existing, nothing happened to cause them other than themselves.

@noppornwongrassamee8941

5 ай бұрын

I agree. I read this video's story as a boot strap paradox. A sign of a good boot strap paradox is that although the chain of events creates a single endless loop, no single object or person in the loop loops indefinitely. And I don't think anything in this video loops indefinitely. TSC himself enters the loop, loops around at least once to meet and supply his past self with stuff, and then leaves.

not only am i glad that alan becker is making animations that can be educational, but also that this person has explained both this video and the math video, making them easier to understand. you are making masterpieces of explanations, +1 sub

The modes at the end near the Einstein-Rosen bridge is a reference to the 5 types of superstring theory which are consistent with our observations of the universe. They arise as limiting conditions of M-theory. More on Ads/CFT correspondence: It states that 4+1 string theory in Ads space (empty universe with negative cosmological constant), including d-branes, is equivalent to Conformal Field Theory (supersymmetric yang-mills theories), more precisely QCD of the strong force. It is the most accepted proof of the holographic principle, which states that the most bits information in a space can be found by maximum number of bits on the boundary.

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for the input! I will include this in the description for sure.

Gravitational slingshots are just "additive" to your speed, but there's another cool effect at play: Oberth manoeuvres, which are multiplicative - since no matter what your speed, the fuel needed in a vacuum to add 1 m/s to your speed is the same, when TSC is very close to a planet and his speed is maximised for "free," his rocket's fuel adds a lot more kinetic energy! Since the gravitational slingshot also counts, it's known as a powered slingshot. Also a nice thought: if you think of it in terms of a stable time loop (because there's time travel), you can see it as there being only one TSC! He helps himself and then goes on to his next adventure :) Very good video, thanks!

I don't agree that the cowboy hat is useless actually. In the sense of physics, yes, but as a visual aid, it is crucial. It allows us to see the way that TSC is facing when they are a 2d stick figure who you'd otherwise be unable to determine from

@bigolnoob5491

5 ай бұрын

He did say "useless"

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Great catch. I was only thinking from a pure physics perspective then.

@SpamMC

5 ай бұрын

Also to distinguish between present tsc and future tsc

@Darwin-sd1gt

5 ай бұрын

it's also a reference to _Dr. Strangelove._ kzread.info/dash/bejne/paKIw7WDm5PUj7w.html

Y'know, I'm pretty proud of myself for correctly identifying most parts of the video when first I watched it on Alan's channel. Like, I knew I enjoyed physics, but the fact I could at least semi-accurately identify every concept before it was stated on screen (up until the string-theory section) despite having zero physics education outside of one semester in high-school years ago, makes me happy :D I will say, though, that I didn't learn the majority of this in school. Sure, I learned the basics about gravity, velocity, magnetism, so on and so forth, but being able to identify a linear particle accelerator visually does not fall under the "basics" 😅 Having an inquisitive mind willing to ask questions, and having unlimited access to the collective knowledge of our civilization in my pocket is what did that. It's a shame so many people get put off by (or are simply satisfied with) the incomplete education they're given in school, and proceed to stop actively learning :/ That's why I love stuff like this - it makes learning fun, and might even convince you to ask questions you didn't have the words for before!

@laaaliiiluuu

4 ай бұрын

Exactly. I got waaaaaay more interest in learning and understanding the world through KZread than I ever had in school.

the hat isn't useless, it helps us distinguish the alternate tscs from each other

2:00 he likely wanted to illustrate the independence of the components of movement in space and just marked the horizontal arrow with F instead of v

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Probably

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Agree from a visual perspective.

Also at 1:48, Force (*not actually force) vector makes angle θ with the horizontal, so F*cosθ should be horizontal, but Alan has switched sin and cos.

@ayannibirkaushik7501

5 ай бұрын

Ya this is a big mistake

I’m fairly certain that the star system in the start is a reference to the TRAPPIST system. Both are systems with several earth-sized planets and a red dwarf at the center

Imagine how much we would be capable of if all of the values for reality were visibly indicated like in this video.

15:07 im probably overanalyzing, but its probably because he reached faster than light speed for a brief period of time

Your commentary added so much value to the video, def deserving of a like

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

How about a sub bro?

@stephen_2091

5 ай бұрын

@@ron-math-lite yeah sure mate

2:55 its probably referencing the old "frictionless ice floor" science problems in schools. you know, the "assuming that there is no friction on the surface" or smth like that

I’m honestly flabbergasted on how simple and still accurate you were explaining this stuff especially Quantum physics ones. I honestly had no idea on most of them. And I have an opinion about the 2 TSC That’s there’s no TSC-2,TSC-3…and so one, I think the “first TSC” have placed those but at the same time I think there’s also No “first TSC” like since it’s an infinite loop it’s like thinking of a bunch of people sitting in a circle-shaped table, like it’s still going there’s no first or last, like they were placed already all of a sudden It’s still interesting to think we have a lot of questions and not answers and that’s what makes us keep going forward and sparking our curiosity Also you deserve better you made such a good video.

Beautiful commentary

Hey you, you're finally awake. Thanks for this man.

also at 7:03 him putting on the hat and bumping the rocket with his legs is a reference to horse riding, as that's exactly what you do on a horse to tell it to speed up

There is no cut-off between X-ray wavelength and gamma ray, both can exist at the same wavelength. The only differentiation is the source they originated from. X-rays are produced by the sudden acceleration of electron charges, and gamma rays come from accelerated nuclear charges. X-ray vs gamma is just a naming convention, the light particles at a given wavelength are indistinguishable.

Near as I can tell, TSC-1, TSC, TSC+1, et al are all the same individual at different points in their single subjective timeline. The only universe they are seen altering is their own, meaning there would be no 'first' TSC who would have no help; TSC is the first to make the trip, and the last - all the assistance is retrocausal, provided to TSC by TSC (as TSC-2) while TSC (as TSC-1) observed, which ensures TSC arrives to observe as TSC-1 replicates TSC-2's actions and then departs, leaving TSC to repeat the loop for TSC+1 before himself departing as TSC+2 arrives. The entire timeline, in this scenario, would be effectively both self-generating and self-contained. To me, this seems suspiciously intuitive; quantum physics has never come this easily to me, and the fact that this concept does means I'm not sure if I took a short-cut somewhere in my reasoning. Then again, I'm probably wrong on some fundamental level I'm unaware of; my background isn't in physics but speculative fiction, where solutions only have to be inspired by the actual science rather than dependent on it. So what do I know?

@zardrevos

5 ай бұрын

So, the total mass and energy in the universe stay the same? Even with multiple TSC sharing the same space at the same time

At 5:33, two things. 1. TSC pulls down on the ball while inside the slope, giving it way more starting kinetic energy than shown. The ball should not stop at the top, but should continue to slide away from TSC due to the added energy he added. 2.TSC is already inside the slope so he will experience less acceleration than the ball. If the ramp was a flat line, then they both would accelerate at the same rate. Once TSC reaches the bottom the ball will slowly start to close the gap and run over him, well before he reaches the rope also due to the first error. You can think of it like a rollar coaster about to go down the drop, the front car really wants to go and is pulling the rest of the carts, but because it is already within the slope it has less velocity at the end and needs to be 'pushed' by the rear carts to make it over the hill.

Another two errors I think there are are that the rocket thrust should be constant, not accelerating just because of the speed boosts, and that the relativistic speed boosts should decrease and change the speed relatively rather than absolutely. Also another person pointed out that blueshifted light sources should be much brighter than redshifted ones. And the torch also seems useless to me, like it's only there to stuff in some demonstrations of light physics

@TheBakingYeast

5 ай бұрын

When he jumped off the rocket to get the magnet the rocket should still be accelerating

@FireyDeath4

5 ай бұрын

​@@TheBakingYeast Oh yeah, I noticed that as well

@jem5636

5 ай бұрын

​@@TheBakingYeast true, and there are plenty of moments where the physics falls apart slightly to make a more coherent narrative, but in that moment the ship and orange are already going so fast that the minor speed boost of the rocket would not make as much of a difference.

Thank you so much for your work explaining everything! It was very interesting, esp since I know almost 0 about string theory other than that it exists lol Very thought provoking questions at the end there! I'll let you know if I find answers XD

22:20 bro, all those questions befuddled my brain even further 😂

Ok, the questions let me speechless for a minute or two... The best analysis I've watched, loved it

i was waiting for you to make a video about this you earned a sub

A beautiful Explanation of a Beautiful masterpiece... Thanks for this Grand Masterpiece... +1 Sub : )

Very veryyy nice explanation.. The things about black hole's theories of that video.. I couldn't relate myself with that as I didn't know the theories.. Now you told these,explained it and now I can undestand the story completely.. thanks a LOT!! but I still can't understand How can anyone relate himself with these and made a story out of it?!.. Alan becker is a GENIUS!!! HE MADE ME CURIOUS ABOUT THIS..

@FireyDeath4

5 ай бұрын

No it's Terkoiz who's the genius, kinda

@anybodyk3524

5 ай бұрын

@@FireyDeath4 who's terkoiz?

@FireyDeath4

5 ай бұрын

@@anybodyk3524 Lead animator who did the scriptwriting for the Animation VS Education videos Alan says more about it in the pinned comments and descriptions

21:45 the modes of the wormhole are the types of universes that superstring theory allows, plus the model described by supergravity. these first 5 models are all possible candidates to be our universe, if we wish to describe it with superstrings, while the remaining supergravity model is composed of "branes", rather than superstrings, amongst other key differences, such as number of dimensions needed to be described. supergravity allows 10 space dimensions and 1 time, while the superstring models allow 9 space and 1 time. however, it's possible to approximate any given model to another with a few tricks. for instance, we can take one of the space dimensions of supergravity and "compactify" it by curling it into itself to form a really small circle. after this, we lose one space dimension, and the branes start behaving like superstrings, specifically like the ones described by superstring theory, specifically the IIA model. many such "dualities" have been found that connect all 6 models to each other. these dualities allow to transform hard calculations in one model into easy calculations in another. these models have allowed to describe cool stuff like the entropy of a black hole (in perfect agreement with hawking radiation's formulas) and the AdS/CFT correspondence (i.e: certain types of universes can be described as holograms of their surfaces). it's unclear which of these models describes our universe, they're all candidates. M theory is a model based on the idea that the dualities suggest that these models are all approximations of a grander, more general model. formalizing M theory has proven to be really really hard.

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Thank you very much for the input!

There is also a thing called causality paradox where an event was caused by itself

The beginning of the video is a connection to the last one, he was brought out of the "math"s real by an equation/portal and boom, there he is

Let's go you made this video ! !

Amazing video.

i loved the breakdown! I am a physics enthusiast even though i am in medical field. I would love to pursue higher physics study someday. Something i take from this video is 'we were The Gods all along'. I loved your work, seems like you have a very deep knowledge and i appreciate it, This video needs more views :) .

Very insightful vid!

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it

Just remember the fact that this is made by an animation team known for minecraft animations... Yes, a game instead of educations. (Also it's very funny how this animation was the result of a lead animator being a nerd positively lol) (Also the ending, i assume, might be a time paradox by the fact it loops itself over)

I think they added the closed strings to allow things to move from one universe to another as well, not being bound to this universe via open strings.

The part where you said that their first mistake appears to be, it appears it’s analyzing different forces and how they act on two dimensional plane; only possible in inaccuracy might be the horizontal force not degrading slightly as the next scene would indicate friction is playing a part of that example. I had struggled in physics, so this observation may be wrong; however, there are two different models/lenses to view physics through, one through algebra, and the other calculus.

Amazing explanation thank you! At the end, it cannot be done without ANYONE's help, I mean literally. That is why it is a theory.

you created much more questions then the actual video did

Ngl, the dot at the start implies that TSC came from Animation vs Math.

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

I thought the same!

@idk54756

5 ай бұрын

​@@ron-math-litealso at 20:46 TSC is likely waving, possibly to e^iπ from animation vs math

I would like to point out that the hat is used to TELL the direction TSC's Face is facing because it would soon become confusing

Understanding this video makes me feel smart

21:44 one piece reference?

See you, Space Cowboy

Just a funny thought I had while watching, although I have no clue if it’s a real thing or not. If we go back in time to change our past, does that not mean we only cause our current present? The paradox of tsc’s is just so brain wrinkling. I love this animation so much

At 17:37, TSC approaches planck's length which is the smallest possible distance observable in the universe.

i read somewhere that an apple did not actually fall on Newton's head, but watching several of them fall inspired him. oh, i just remembered: in the "death gate" stories by Margaret Weiss and Tracy Hickman, Magic worked by altering probability waves! the "death gate" itself was something like a rotating black hole, and at the climax of the story, the protagonists "close" the "gate" by making it STOP rotating!

I am waiting for KZread recommending me a video like: "EXPERIMENT: Moving on an Ice with a Rope and Ball - like in Animation vs Physics Video"

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Check my channel in about one month when it snows.

Truely a Masterpiece

I stopped having any clue since he started to approach the black hole, that was my limit of understanding, i feel dumb?

@rumaneogi3787

5 ай бұрын

You're not alone bro I lost it there too😂

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

You are good :)

I wrote the following in the original video, and I wanna add on below this (will be quite long): "This feels like the plot for the infamous Interstellar. Below are spoiler: Both have their main protagonist went into the blackhole, but instead of dying, they discovered something that's unknown to current science. While during those discoveries, they realised everything that happened in the past does indeed get interfered by some unknown being, and those being ended up to be themselves. Despite with the paradox of Information Loop, they closed the circle while didn't break the rules cuz guess what, informations in theory can't escape blackhole." As I mentioned, we know that this essentially causing the time loop paradox, The Bootstrap Paradox, The Grandfather Paradox, or those who watched Loki it's the Ouroboros Paradox or whatever. But, since we don't know much about Blackhole, and even Kurzgesagt have a video about information paradox caused by blackholes.... Welp, paradox counters paradox I guess.

thought i was the only one who noticed the light wavelength mistake lol

Few mistake/misunderstandings in the end. In the End since Singularity is in the future, our guardian TSC throws stuff to the past which makes the actual TSC arrive at the Singularity. When TSC arrives and guardian TSC leaves, our TSC becomes the new guardian. Its a time loop with two TSC only (three when in the end that our TSC also gets to see the start of another TSC because events somewhat overlap.) One more notable mistake is that you counted around 5 TSC when the wormhole turns but its just one TSC, our guardian TSC. So the timeline(timeloop) is as such. - Things started and somehow our first TSC reached Singularity. - Our guardian then began throwing stuff to the past which makes the past TSC arrive easier. - The past TSC arrives and two stick figures stay for a bit, the guardian leaves and our TSC becomes the new guardian. Shortly after the past TSC that was seen arrives and same things happen. Its a timeloop that guardian TSC leaves and the next TSC becomes the guardian only to leave once the new one comes.

I think the TSC's placing the objects through the wormhole weren't different ones but it is TSC- who was rewinding and we are just seeing how he helped TSC get there. Since TSC- rewound everything he stopped on himself (TSC-) before he entered the blackhole and lured himself him with the apple so TSC can repeat the porcess for TSC-². (I think). My thing is when TSC repeats this process for TSC-² will they see TSC interacting with TSC- when he rewinds the wormhole? Ohhh and before TSC- jumps in the wormhole he basically saying "see you space cowboy" 😂

Hope we did make it.

He really shouldn't be able to accelerate using those magnets, unless those were electromagnets, and were shutting off whenever Orange passed them.

A personally I think all the TSCs are the same and this is a stable time loop

19:11 can the way TSC-2 was running towards TSC-1 but not outrunning him be the "turtle and the athlete" dichotomy?

physics is fun

Not even all the math from Animation vs Math could prepare TSC for what he was about to see (and calculate)

Dude is a god now

Thanks

@smugloozr2524

5 ай бұрын

?

@Sonnic_Aditya777

5 ай бұрын

@@smugloozr2524 ???

@JustAnotherCommenter

5 ай бұрын

huh cat be like:

"tsc-1 is effectively a god" nah, I'm pretty sure TSC actually is just a god.

15:06 very likely only for visual effect 15:20 pretty sure that's his hand wrapping around the apple

I think the perfect answer for now is "Yesn't" Nonsense answer for nonsense questions till it proved. But if that really can be true... its cool to think like there's exits "the other me in the other universe" and you can't be the "other" you because what defines "you" right now is you and what you did. (Man that's sound special) Maybe the other you is happier than you or vice versa. Life is so amazing! But at the end. Are we will make it? Or did we? "We can only imagine".

THX SOUND EFFECT

There is a mistake in the magnetic coil acceleration part, According to the video, The magnetic fields of the coil and the rocket ship, They are polar opposites, however, when TSC passes through the coil his speed should Decelerate as after he passes the coils the opposites in the magnetic fields line up, so according to that logic, the speed should stay the Same, however there is a way to make the illustration of the video possible, when TSC was travelling through the coil, he should have deactivated his magnet, and so his speed would accelerate, repeat the process and the video becomes more accurate.

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Check this one: kzread.info/dash/bejne/m62qm6mhkay6fqg.html

thankyouuu

1) why did the apple grow when TSC entered the inner horizon? 2) what the hell is tsc standing in the singularity? 3) where did TSC-1 go?

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

1) likely a visual design choice so we can see inside stuff 2) 3) Don’t know. Like the math one, sometimes I am not sure whether it is a visual choice or scientific accuracy. Finding the balance is difficult.

@dibbidydoo4318

5 ай бұрын

1)Because objects appear bigger from inside the inner horizon. 3) type 2 multiverse with different physical constants from mark tegmark's classifications.

@laitraptrensonga7366

5 ай бұрын

@@dibbidydoo4318 could you please explain further 3)? I have been reading about types of superstring theories (too technical), I can see that he will go to IIB from I but what will happen exactly?

@JustAnotherCommenter

5 ай бұрын

​@@laitraptrensonga7366It's likely that TSC-1 became TSC-2, then became TSC-3, and so on eternally. It functions as an actual "multiversal" time loop. The mode that he switched to is probably to go back to the same "place" (the singularity) and not to drop somewhere else (e.g. above TSC+1's head, which would, btw, break causality and create a timeline branch). So to answer #3, he might've went to the singularity's "past", which is also the "future" of other TSCs in the other timelines. In fact, I believe that TSC-, TSC, and TSC+ are the same person and that TSC-2 appeared as a ghost while rewinding time because the cylinder was spinning. TSC-2 even waved back as if he was interacting with TSC (idk about that part).

@laitraptrensonga7366

5 ай бұрын

@@JustAnotherCommenter I thought of a solution, because moving along the cylinder would create a CTC, so the TSC- would become the TSC at the start of the video, falling from the sky like the ropes, so an infinite loop with a finite numbers of TSC. But where would the cowboy hat be and can switching the string theory break the loop, bring TSC into another universe?

The real physics was the TSCs we made along the way

@cason7543

5 ай бұрын

What’s TSC?

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

The second coming.

16:34 just to clear something up, "photon" was meant to be written as "proton"

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Thanks! I fixed the mistake in the updated version.

Thank you for all the explanations. But I still cannot wrap my head around time and space dilation. Sure, it will look like things behind you slow down and things ahead are moving faster, but does it really changes the time and space, or just your perception of it?

@A-Rod1337

5 ай бұрын

It changes the perception based on POV. Time exists the same everywhere. What changes is your perception of it relative to your origin point. Same thing about entering the black hole. In reality we'd be dead from spaghettification long before hand but as the video said, you will see TSC turn red and stop whereas TSC will see all light refract and curve around him until he sees nothing. For time, the tree will be long dead and fossilized over a period of seconds perceived by TSC if he returns to the planet. This is why space travel is such a conundrum. If we were to go to just mars. We would calculate time differently due to the location of the planet relative to the sun. We dictate that there are 24 hours in one day(how long it takes for the planet to rotate) and 365 days in a year (how long it takes to orbit the sun and +1 for every leap year). Mars, for example, would have 32 hours in a day and 405 days in a year relative to location. But time goes by the same everywhere. A second is a second regardless of where you are. What changes is the perception of it.

@RMX7777

5 ай бұрын

It's not that it speeds up ahead of him and slows down behind, time will slow down in all directions. Along with this, distances will contract making the universe smaller. It's not simply a matter of perspective, our universe is capable of being placed into multiple coexisting states. The reality is that time is both moving at normal speed to an outside observer, and at reduced speed to the near light speed observer. An example of this that can be demonstrated here on earth is electric charge vs magnetism. Take an electromagnet, from an outside frame of reference it appears to have a net zero electric charge (same number of electrons vs protons). When the electrons flow through the wires of the electromagnet, that net charge is unchanged. Now look at it from the electrons perspective. Because they are moving, space appears to contract. This causes the protons to become more dense than the electrons, creating an imbalance of charges. This is why magnetic fields can alter the paths of charged particles, because magnetism is actually electric fields from a different frame of reference. Both the neutral charge and unbalanced charge exist within the same space simultaneously.

@A-Rod1337

5 ай бұрын

@@RMX7777 what I mean though is that his body will age normally compared to another back on the planet. I do see your point however. If my body is 30 years old and my brother is the same and I leave earth at light speed for 10 seconds and return, my brother will be dead and I will still be 30 years old in my time. But according to earth I will be well over hundreds of years old no?

@RMX7777

5 ай бұрын

@@A-Rod1337 Traveling at exactly the speed of light, you would not experience time at all. Assuming you spend 10 seconds of earth time traveling away from the earth, and then 10s returning, your brother would be exactly 20s older than you. If you are traveling at nearly the speed of light, you will experience only a fraction of the time that passes on earth, but regardless of speed the time that passes on earth will always be 20 seconds. As I'm writing this, I realize you probably meant 10 seconds of time for the traveler, in which case yes, you would experience 20s and earth would experience many years. Due to the contractions of space, you would have traveled a distance of hundreds of light-years instead of 10 light seconds. From Earth's perspective you would have looked like you were moving near the speed of light, and it might take them a hundred years just to see you breath, as your time is slowed down from their perspective. They would see you travel near the speed of light for a distance of hundreds of light-years, and it would take you hundreds of years to get there.

@A-Rod1337

5 ай бұрын

@@RMX7777 that is what I was getting at yes. And that is what I meant by time being the same anywhere. It's always counting the same it was just a matter of perspective in that sense

7:42 i think c roughly about 300000000m/s

I think there is an issue with the accelerator. Would the magnets not have to be turned off after he went through? If they were permanently on he would just get sucked backwards until he had the same velocity as before going in.

@ron-math-lite

4 ай бұрын

This is a very interesting question that I tend to agree with you. But I also saw experiments using permanent magnets doing it. See this one: kzread.info/dash/bejne/m62qm6mhkay6fqg.html When I got more time, I will do more investigation. Thanks for pointing it out!

The author, the first mistake was made at 1:31, when for some reason the mass had a vector. This weight has a vector, but the mass does not.

I think the hat was just there so we didn’t get them mixed up at the end

This was fucking insane, holy shit im dead

letsgo. thanks for decently explainig the last part of the video

13:40 misspelt ''Doppler'' as ''Dopller'' Also the rocket's acceleration is vastly inconsistent. it begins accelerating at 1ms^-2 but towards the blackhole its ***accelerating itself at many hundreds, even thousands of times faster.

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Fixed the Dopller in new version

literal peakness

Is the 2B on the Wormhole meaning the kardashev scale?

Wouldn't you get a force decelerating you from the magnetic ring behind you once you passed through it? would this not cancel out the gain in speed?

@A-Rod1337

5 ай бұрын

The video portrays this in the red and blue arrows. Think of it like the accelerator on a hot wheels track. One side of the ring draws you in and the other throws you out. Your comment would be true if the polarity was reversed. In that case both sides would be pushing against you but all rings were the same polarity and thus increased his speed through every ring.

@RMX7777

5 ай бұрын

​@@A-Rod1337 Incorrect, watch the animation closely. Opposite poles attract, when entering the ring and when exiting, you will see that opposite poles are facing each other. As aissurteivos suggests, you would experience deceleration upon exiting, returning your velocity to its starting point (plus the speed gained from the rocket thrust). To make the accelerator function, the magnetic field of the rings would need to collapse at the moment TSC had converted all magnetic potential energy into kinetic (the center of the ring).

@A-Rod1337

5 ай бұрын

​@@RMX7777 would you say that the speed he gains is greater than the force pulling him back then?

@RMX7777

5 ай бұрын

Certainly not. The rocket is shown to only increase his speed by a few meters per second, where the magnets brought him up to 80% the speed of light. As currently depicted, his velocity with the magnets would be exactly equal to his velocity without any magnets to begin with. To gain speed, one of the magnetic fields would have to collapse at the point of maximum velocity. That is how all electromagnetic accelerators work. Without a magnetic field collapsing, the physics would mirror the example of the boulder rolling down the valley. The magnet gains speed as it descends the potential well, building kinetic energy, and then ascends the potential well after passing through the ring, converting the kinetic energy back into potential. The total kinetic energy is the same as before entering, plus what he gained from the rocket. This would be the exact same change in speed if the magnets hadn't existed at all.

@A-Rod1337

5 ай бұрын

@@RMX7777 then it most likely happened without being shown in that case.

Shouldn't the black hole in AGN with its jets and accretion disk be oriented so that TSC would be facing one of these jets or am i missing the gravitational lensing at some point?

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

I think the visuals are serving the story in the later half, mostly.

Can someone pls explain how TSC uses the Horseshoe magnet to magnetise the solenoid like that and amplify it?

15:20 that is TSC curling his arm around the apple its just hard to tell

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

You are right. I was looking it as if an arm penetrates the apple.

Where did TSC, the one who left from the wormhole go to? Who are all the people before that came that made the accelerator, the magnets? I assume they are all just points in the past, present, and future. I don’t think there are other universes.

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

I bet $2 it is going to the animation vs engineering or animation vs chemistry world.

Question, in the magnetic flux part, does tsc suppose to speed up there? Becuase after it went in, should the magnetic force attract to each other after it pass ring? The back side of the rocket is red while the left side of the ring is blue. So if it supposedly attract each other then does that mean tsc's velocity should decrease of the attraction?

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Hey! Great question! The animation didn't show it precisely but I found you a video to demonstrate the idea by changing the distances between the rings: kzread.info/dash/bejne/m62qm6mhkay6fqg.html

The greatist question: where did TSC get all that stuff to put in the space to help other TSC ?

@user-ct5zg2gu8j

5 ай бұрын

He made it From quantum strings

1:55 - I agree, there is a no horizontal force (didn't even notice before). Also the vertical force should change. Imho, the vectors just present the velocity components. 6:12 - here, "F" is also mistakenly used to call the velocity. There is no force perpendicular to the rope. 7:57 - I didn't even notice :D

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

This what frame by frame means my friend.

I don't think the cowboy hat is useless...my take is that the "stick" man represents information, and the hat helps in the space-time wormhole part to reference whether information is lost or not...the hat represents additional information that is gained, lost, and transfered.

7:40 c / speed of light is roughly 300,000,000 m/s, not 3,000,000.

12:50 It will be, nothing, not even Light can escape

3:44 what the fu** How did Alan not realize that?

Is the last bit where TSC chooses the wormhole “mode” still physics or is it made up? What do the shapes and 2b mean?

@ron-math-lite

5 ай бұрын

Please check my updated version of this video. It does mean something from superstring theory.

I like how a stickfigure can easily reach world record speed without much sweat.