The absolute worst decision EVER by SCOTUS was Kelo Vs City of New London which allowed government to take private property and give it to a corporation if corporation can increase the tax revenue of said property.

@josephpadula2283

6 ай бұрын

Charlie The land was taken but the project was never built !

@charlieruns7953

6 ай бұрын

@@josephpadula2283 I know, right! As if taking private property wasn't criminal enough, the reason they took it never happened. Disgusting

@user-gz9uk4rn5p

6 ай бұрын

awful

@willmont8258

6 ай бұрын

You are correct. I also consider that one of the worst. The Court changed the words "for public use" into "for a public purpose", and that now means anyone can have their property taken just because the city wants someone else to have it and increase the property taxes paid on it.

@heatherhall7899

6 ай бұрын

That was a horrible decision also.

‘Hard to believe’ the US government is ‘working against its own citizens’: Texas AG

@karlfowler3742

6 ай бұрын

I hope Trump makes Ken Paxton his AG. He has the motivation needed to bring the traitors to justice

@themrkkohler

6 ай бұрын

Hard to believe... Our government is corrupt beyond repair...

@lizerdmonk

6 ай бұрын

Hard to believe an American President tried to change the outcome of an election just because he lost and than tried to force a rebellion to stay in power when he scam of manufacturing fake electors didn't work and he was not convicted for Treason?

@labtechtech

6 ай бұрын

@@karlfowler3742Yes, why not have everyone in the Executive branch be criminals. Wonderful idea.

@patricknugent6651

6 ай бұрын

I’m not a democrat but neither am I a traitor to America. I might or might not agree with a president, or a parties policies or point of view, but never would I ever agree to, partake in or support any person or party that would PHYSICALLY attack the United States government on the orders of a President trying to cling onto power. They ordered an attack on the backbone of what makes America stand out in the world at americas homes of homes the United States Capitol Building by trying to destroy Americas democracy & its constitution. And if you don’t think that trying to overturn an election by force isn’t treason then I don’t know what is. This was carried out for one persons idea of what he thinks America should be & by a party that continues to lie to the American people on a continuous basis, when the evidence is there to prove them wrong. Everyone’s on edge at the moment & blaming the Biden administration for what’s happening to Trump, but you see it’s not the Biden administration that’s causing all of trump’s problems, it’s American democracy & the constitution fighting back because it was attacked by Trump & the Republican Party while they were trying to cling onto power anyway they could. its just coming back to bite them that’s all. You attack America you pay a price end of story. You see this is why American democracy & the constitution is there, it’s to protect anyone that tries to attack America or her people. It doesn’t make any difference wether you are a Republican or a democrat, the American constitution & its democracy, was, & still is, being attacked on a daily basis & America needs everyone’s help both republican & democrats to unite to stop the carnage. It can’t be allowed to continue, because America as you know it now, for better or for worse, will be disintegrate by foreign bodies that don’t agree with the American constitution as it stands. They only want to install their own party rules & laws by getting rid of what’s there already & which has protected all American people this far. Sure, fight like cats and dogs in the streets over the border & the likes, that’s politics & political bullshit because they want to get one over on their opposition, but no political party should ever be allowed to PHYSICALLY attack the United States Capitol Building, American democracy & the constitution on anyone’s orders. That’s not politics anymore by a party, that’s someone starting an internal war in America. That’s an attack on every American, man woman & child world wide. This attack on January 6th needs to be destroyed so deep into the core of American politics, that no person or party will ever ever consider the idea again. People have to be held accountable for Americas sake. If you don’t put out all the flames of a fire properly first time round, those embers just might gain momentum when you’re being distracted by something else, destroying everything in its path. Right now as it presently stands, American democracy & the constitution are the foundation of the American people’s laws, which in place binds all Americans together all over the world. If you decide to let that go, you are really letting American go, as you are turning your back on everything that has been achieved since the foundation of the United States of America. At this present moment in time the evidence shows that a majority of Republican Party members & supporters were the people who, planned, supported, partook & executed the attack on January 6th under there leader Mr Trump. To this very day they are still attacking Americas democracy including the constitution by words & actions on a daily basis. Yet to date, not one republican senator or member that took an oath of office to protect the same, has been arrested, removed from office or held accountable for their involvement in the January 6th attempted overthrow of the American government. Not one.. Next time it could be democrats, or maybe republicans again, god knows, but whoever it is, the American people cannot allow its democracy & constitution to be attacked or destroyed by any one person or party. It’s not about republicans fighting democrats or democrats fighting republicans, it’s about all of the American people fighting against anyone who attacks America, and especially its democracy & the constitution. Fight & vote for the right reason and not a party or person. In other words fight for America. For those who understand, No explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, No explanation possible .

Was Trump ever charged or convicted of a insurrection? No

@michaelgibbons2556

6 ай бұрын

The Constitution doesn’t require a conviction, genius.

@danguest5379

6 ай бұрын

He has been convicted for sexual assault , but you're ok with that ?

@soundkillr

6 ай бұрын

Nor does it apparently define what an insurrection is. It's a shame people hid behind that in the case of this witch hunt propagated by the left in an effort to devide us even further​@@michaelgibbons2556

@davidisenberg125

6 ай бұрын

@@michaelgibbons2556 ok einstien, how many rioters were charged with insurrection ???? would you got to a REAL overthrow with a bullhorn and a flag ????

@HeinzGuderian_

6 ай бұрын

@@michaelgibbons2556 it requires an actual crime. Trump was never charged with one while president.

I thought the supreme court was to enforce the law not make new laws

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

The Judicial Branch including SCOTUS does not enforce the law. That is the job of the Executive Branch. The Legislative Branch makes the laws. The Judicial Branch interprets the laws when there are questions or controversies. So what new law do you think SCOTUS made?

@domcizek

5 ай бұрын

SORRY, THE CONSTITUTION SAYS TRUMP IS NOT ELEGIBLE, BECAUSE HE CAUSED THE INSURECTION

It would be nice to have a little background on what the hell they are talking about. What decision?

@marcusmaddox2176

6 ай бұрын

The secretary of state of Maine has decided that Trump is disqualified from the primary ballot because a the Supreme Court of Colorado decided he has committed " insurrection" but without a jury conviction. So Trump has been denied a jury trial but that doesn't matter to these insane Democrats BTW there is a beautiful picture of the Secretary of State of Maine standing very to Biden ( just the two of them ) Biden has one of his hands on her shoulder and he has her hand clasped tightly to hers in a palm to palm grip Still this woman didn't think this should a reason to recuse herself from this decision, which was hers alone

@TheFrogfeeder

6 ай бұрын

They are discussing the Trump ballot Maine case, but he is saying the bush gore case was the worst ever… Dershowitz is on the Epstein list

@dandybufo9664

6 ай бұрын

@@TheFrogfeeder and Trump flew repeatedly on Epstein's Jet.

@theowl3756

6 ай бұрын

The background is too embarrassing, and that's why is being ignored. They know it is stupid to say that if engaged in insurrection, only Congressman and Senators will be disqualified to run for office. But the president and vice president can engage in insurrection, and still can for office...LOL

@jeffanderson8165

6 ай бұрын

Good question. My anger is a little high, so please bear with me on this. MY UNDERSTANDING (so it's kinda weak) is that, because this judge in Maine believes MSNPC when they say, "Orange Man Led Insurrection to Overthrow US Government," he's not entitled to run for President of the United States based on the Insurrection clause of the fourteenth amendment. Problem is he's not been convicted and we are supposed to live in a country where someone is presumed innocent until proven guilty by a jury of his/her peers. The Bush v. Gore case was with regard to the 2000 election, where in four districts in Florida (of eleven, if memory serves), Pro-Gore vote counters went through the punch cards to ascertain what they THOUGHT the person was saying with their vote. This meant that in four districts, a subjective analysis of the official vote card was used while in the other seven (again, my memory; this was nearly a quarter of a century ago) a different standard of analysis was used. The Bush legal team won before SCOTUS based on the two different standards of analysis was a violation of the fifteenth amendment (or maybe fourteenth amendment) granting a completely *equal* (emphasis important) vote to every man (at the time; amended later to rightly include women).

Mr. Dershowitz says going through the court system is a terrible thing. Yeah, I believe that.

@ostlandr

6 ай бұрын

When he said that, my first thought was "Wot fresh douchbaggery be this?"

@9rivers

6 ай бұрын

@@ostlandr I see you have never been in the system .

@misterr50

6 ай бұрын

hopefully he will go through that court system he so firmly believes in, for others of course

@johnsummerhill8323

6 ай бұрын

This is one of Epstein's buddies.

@frankmartin8471

6 ай бұрын

But we have that pillar of justice and righteousness sitting on the Supreme Court bench. You know, the Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas.

What the hell is going on with American justice system? when they proceed to convict individuals on name alone

@robthom09

6 ай бұрын

LOL, trump is not pursued because of name nor party. If he had been exactly the same person, but ran as a democrat, NONE of these republicans would be defending him, and he would already be in prison.

@michaelwimberley6695

6 ай бұрын

We have never had a justice system. It is The criminals justice system. Justice for criminals.

@sophiaestella5611

6 ай бұрын

@@michaelwimberley6695 Is that the same as Trump's Derangement Syndrome ?

@keithziegler8881

6 ай бұрын

Let us be very clear here. Trump is not been convicted on name alone. Trump is going to go to prison after he's convicted for the crimes he committed Just because you won't admit he's guilty of crimes doesn't mean the real Americans don't know he's guilty, have not seen the crimes he committed, and don't want him held accountable.

@huemann7637

6 ай бұрын

It’s called corruption. How do you think unconstitutional drug prohibition laws have been on the books for over half a century when we already have the Supreme Court decision on the repeal of alcohol prohibition. It clearly states that they repealed prohibition because the federal government lacks the authority granted by the constitution to ban things because they get you intoxicated.

What a cool guy. Im sure he loves plane rides to special places.

@danaday7266

6 ай бұрын

if it's his client

@lionheartmerrill1069

6 ай бұрын

Alan "Epstein Island" Dershowitz

Boy the level of shadow banning on this thread is astounding.

Old Alan is a vote blue no matter who individual. He’s so partisan he can’t see the New democrat socialist party is not the same democrat party he grew up supporting. He so partisan he forget how the National Socialist Part in Germany treated the Jews.

@imaouima

6 ай бұрын

“You have no right not to be vaccinated… And if you refuse to be vaccinated, the state has the power to literally take you to a doctor’s office and plunge a needle into your arm.”-Alan Dershowitz

@brothermac9719

6 ай бұрын

Alan believes the DMC is still the same as his dad's.

@Aki-OB1

6 ай бұрын

Definitely a MAGA believe he defended him in both impeachments

@garyleewhite

6 ай бұрын

But the weird part is that he says over & over again is that he would never vote for Trump. Something just doesn't add up with him. @@Aki-OB1

@rickydee5863

6 ай бұрын

New democratic socialist party .?you are talking about the current democratic party right?if you are and beieve the socialist democratic part of your comment you are obviously delusional

Its probably best that Alan D keep a low profile soon with the release of the Jeffery Epstien flight logs being revealed

@lockwoodpeckinpaugh9252

6 ай бұрын

It means nothing really. Epstein had lots of money and he covered his tracks with powerful people. He wasn't sharing his little girls with anyone.

Its time to reassess our governments ability to make rational decisions for the people not; themselves, major cooperation's, elites and Foreign parties/entities!

Remember the latest judge didn’t know what a woman is. These are not our best and brightest

@lingyjennifer8399

6 ай бұрын

It appears many MAGA don't actually know that.

The $upreme Court is supposed to decide on principle, but it's always been political, which is why we had to beat back FDR's attempt to pack it with Democrats who'd follow his orders.

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

So it is ok to pack the court with federalists who will follow Trump’s orders. But I agree that SCOTUS should decide based on law and the constitution.

The lawyer of a child ❤️ er. This lawyer is a monster 👹

I agree that the people decide politics and not judges however I disagree with stalking judges over politics too.

@mikewurlitzer5217

6 ай бұрын

It is perfectly fine to stalk a judge as long as Chuck Schumer says so.

@robthom09

6 ай бұрын

Yes, and the threats, and stalking are crimes incited by trump which is yet another crime committed by trump.

@combatmedic91-b76

6 ай бұрын

Schumer sucks😅

@jacuzzihot

6 ай бұрын

Yeah of course. But without integrity and INDEPENDENT oversight of judges and police, justice is hi-jacked by the rich.

So....let me get this right, burning down police stations and neighborhoods, hurting and killing people is NOT an insurrection or a crime, but having your cell phone and a cardboard sign at the capital, while being allowed into the capital building, is an insurrection WORSE than the Civil War?

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

Burning down buildings by itself is not an insurrection, but it is a crime. Having a cardboard sign and your cell phone at the Capitol building is not an insurrection. Using that cardboard sign to attack people at the Capitol is a crime. People are claiming they were allowed into the building forgetting all the violence and tearing down barriers on the way to the doors; of fact that they attacked police who were trying to keep them out; of the windows that were broken to gain entrance; of the offices that were broken into; of the vandalism that the insurrectionists perpetrated; and most importantly of the official proceedings that were interrupted as Congress and the VP fled for their lives. This was an attack on our country!

@BMAGA2

6 ай бұрын

Y. Yes🤪

@chrisbraswell8864

6 ай бұрын

All those undercover agents that were there could have stopped it all, So could the National Guard that Trump offered could have stopped it too. It was planned to happen. By many underhanded people.@@froglady7491

@ExploringCabinsandMines

6 ай бұрын

​@@froglady7491 LMFAO suuuure it was.The Buffalo guy almost took over! Baaahahahahah! glad we dodged that one.

@Dude_Slick

6 ай бұрын

@@froglady7491 We saw plenty of footage of police waving the crowd into building. The barriers were ripped down by the implanted feds of which there were many.

0:53 - 'In America, we don't follow the Constitution.' Brilliant lawyering, Dersch.

LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE ... LET THE PEOPLE VOTE WITHOUT CONNIVED INTERFERENCE

@james_b1279

6 ай бұрын

Exactly what potus 45 is fighting for.

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

So you want every question to be decided by the entire voting population of the United States? Are you willing to in hear all the evidence for and against Trump or have you already made up your mind?

Just because they are supreme court justices does not mean they are honest at their jobs.

@leczorn

6 ай бұрын

The same is also true with scientists and medical doctors, as we particularly learned during the COVID tyranny. We must always be free to examine evidence and make decisions for ourselves.

@user-fn7pm1dd8u

6 ай бұрын

Someone should grill John Roberts on why he was attacked and hit over the head in June 2020, right before Harris’ eligibility came under fire. Maybe ask him about the Indian immigrant Chief Judge of the D.C. Court of Appeals who denied a hearing of Robert C. Laity’s very solid and very valid case against Harris in September 2020 too! It’s so odd considering Kamala Harris, Vivek Ramaswamy and Nikki Haley were all born citizens of India!

@yessir6399

6 ай бұрын

​@@leczornEXACTLY!

@jacuzzihot

6 ай бұрын

Exactly. Everything supreme ends up getting away with everything because they can act with impunity having no higher court to challenge them and they are not going to challenge themselves....well even if they did....it is like the police investigating the police...anything may come out of that. Besides candidates are not selected for their personal values....

@kmg501

6 ай бұрын

Incompetence is incompetence.

So Dersh is saying the courts should not resolve disputes re: legal interpretations of Amendments to the Constitution. Sure, Alan.

@oldrrocr

6 ай бұрын

Dersh lost all credibility when he represented trump in one of his impeachments.. yeah, I know, for the money.

@user-oo9tw1cb2c

6 ай бұрын

....and his a lawyer ??????? lol

Worst decision was for him to be on epsteins Island

@gringott12

6 ай бұрын

He claims there was no happy ending. Just a massage in his boxers.

The 2000 Florida votes were meticulously recounted AFTER Bush was inaugurated and deemed that he truly had WON so I disagree with Dershowitz on this one.

@AlanRoehrich9651

6 ай бұрын

Exactly. Dershowitz is wrong this time. No one is perfect.

@rbm6184

6 ай бұрын

@CulpeperMortgage I agree 100%.

@Milkmans_Son

6 ай бұрын

why would they count votes after it was over? that makes no sense.

@marksolum1794

6 ай бұрын

The butterfly ballot was the problem where Gore votes went to Pat Buchanan, but there was no way to correct for that so they just had to stand.

@JackCarlock56

6 ай бұрын

I believe that Dershowitz is referring to the 500,000 more votes for Gore over the idiot prince nationwide.

We the People need a President with the most indictments 🇺🇸

@rosemariemello6675

6 ай бұрын

False ones at that 😂

@chrislapp9468

6 ай бұрын

indictments are nothing. But please hold your breath waiting for a conviction. If any.

Let’s clarify something. According to every liberal Florida newspaper (Miami, Ft. Lauderdale, Tallahassee, Tampa, Orlando), at no point did any vote recount have Al Gore winning FL in 2000.

@9rivers

6 ай бұрын

It never changes when you recount the same corrupt votes. Duh

@scottelkin562

6 ай бұрын

Let's also remember, The League of Women Voters was caught, on camera, stuffing ballot boxes with ballot's that had no other election vote than Al Gore for President. This was the "hanging chad". Those ballot's were punched with a paper punch. They were still counted, which led to that whole farce in the first place.

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

But at the same time, there were so many irregularities in the voting process. We heard daily of something new. SCOTUS actually stopped the last recount.

@rjgib1016

6 ай бұрын

LIES

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

@@rjgib1016 Whose?

Anyone still not convinced that the swamp is real???🎉🎉🎉🎉

Democrats: Republican redistricting is disenfranchisng minority voters! It is unacceptable! Also Democrats: "Let's disenfranchise millions of Republican voters by unilaterally removing the leading opposition candidate from the ballot. That's totally acceptable!" 🤡🤡🤡🤡

@compulsiveviewingmaterials

6 ай бұрын

He tried a coup.

@ostrich67

6 ай бұрын

Repubicans: "What about law and order?" Also Republicans:

@RockSmithStudio

6 ай бұрын

@@compulsiveviewingmaterialswhich he has yet to be convicted of in a criminal procedure

@SicketMog

6 ай бұрын

@@ostrich67 Watching the US fall apart from the outside it's pretty clear it's not republicans that are the most whacky ones... That feels VERY weird to say about people who, generally, believe in an invisible, all-knowing being in the sky morally judging you...

@compulsiveviewingmaterials

6 ай бұрын

Yet he has no desire to try and clear his name. his goal is delay and try and pardon himself. The amount of evidence against him, he is toast.@@RockSmithStudio

Here's some questions I'd like answered, The DC Police requested additional support 17 requests in 78 minutes, who refused those requests? Trump offered National Guard to help Police the area, who turned that down? Why barricades were removed and the crowd ushered towards the Capital Building? How many Federal Agents where in the crowd and what intel and operational plans did the FBI have? Why was a side door opened to allow protestors into the building and a DC Police Officer said "I may not agree with this but I respect your right" when that door was secure? This is why Trump will never get indicted for Insurrection because it will expose Democrats as either compliant in their lack of action or incompetent and will expose the FBI having Agents and agitators in the crowd and that it was a false flag operation exonerating Trump on this insurrection charge.

@Joshua_Froschauer

6 ай бұрын

Fucking exactly

@GNFLYER

6 ай бұрын

He already has been indicted and will go on trial in March 2024.

@matthewdoyle3628

6 ай бұрын

@@GNFLYER He has not been indicted on charges of insurrection.

The supreme Court had to step in and Bush versus Gore because there was more than three recounts and the people couldn't decide and it kept going to court and finally the supreme Court had to say enough. Now while some may find that controversial one could truly speculate that we'd still be in court to this day because the Dems couldn't figure out what a hanging chad was.

@chrisbraswell8864

6 ай бұрын

Democrats like recounts until they win.

@maizie9454

6 ай бұрын

you know nothing about the Florida recount

@retirednavy8720

6 ай бұрын

Not quite. Close but not quite. The Sec of State for FL called the election in accordance with FL election law when time ran out. Despite numerous recounts Gore never had more votes counted than Bush. Gore appealed FL calling the election because he wanted more recounts. SCOTUS ruled for FL because Article 2 of the Constitution allows states to make election laws and the FL Sec of State was following the law in FL. By the way that election law in FL was put on the books by the DEMs.

@retirednavy8720

6 ай бұрын

@@maizie9454 The Sec of State for FL called the election in accordance with FL election law when time ran out. Despite numerous recounts Gore never had more votes counted than Bush. Gore appealed FL calling the election because he wanted more recounts. SCOTUS ruled for FL because Article 2 of the Constitution allows states to make election laws and the FL Sec of State was following the law in FL. By the way that election law in FL was put on the books by the DEMs.

@J4sse

6 ай бұрын

Yes

If you don’t like a provision in the Constitution in this situation you are basically saying that the Constitution should be disregarded because in your personal belief the voters should decide ? Like it or not, we have in place an Amendment to the Constitution that bans Insurrectionists from taking office. The only legitimate question is what form of Court proceeding should used to determine whether Trump committed insurrection.

@lorettathomas3994

6 ай бұрын

He hasn't had a trial, but the Colorado AG has convicted him and is desperately trying to remove him from the ballot. Maine is also swirling down the same toilet. That's not justice.

If Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is "self-executing," without the need for a conviction, does that not constitute a bill of attainder prohibited by the Constitution? Article I, Section 9, Clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. “Bills of attainder . . . are such special acts of the legislature, as inflict capital punishments upon persons supposed to be guilty of high offences, such as treason and felony, without any conviction in the ordinary course of judicial proceedings. If an act inflicts a milder degree of punishment than death, it is called a bill of pains and penalties. . . . In such cases, the legislature assumes judicial magistracy, pronouncing upon the guilt of the party without any of the common forms and guards of trial, and satisfying itself with proofs, when such proofs are within its reach, whether they are conformable to the rules of evidence, or not. In short, in all such cases, the legislature exercises the highest power of sovereignty, and what may be properly deemed an irresponsible despotic discretion, being governed solely by what it deems political necessity or expediency, and too often under the influence of unreasonable fears, or unfounded suspicions.” --Cornell University of Law Is this not what we are currently seeing being brought to bear against Trump?

@mikewurlitzer5217

6 ай бұрын

Obama openly admitted his hatred for the Constitution and since we did nothing about it, democrats have felt free to ignore it at every turn.

@retirednavy8720

6 ай бұрын

Sec 5 of the 14th amendment states only congress has the authority to act within the provisions set forth in the amendment. Congress has not taken any action therefore the 14th amendment does not apply. Go read the whole amendment.

@jimpeel

6 ай бұрын

@@retirednavy8720 Tried to respond but it went to the wrong thread above. I have read the entire Amendment from Section 1, Due process; to Section 3, Insurrection; to Section 5, Exclusive Congressional power to enforce.

Daily reminder. The last time the supreme court interfered with our ability to choose who to vote for was Lincoln. This also led to the civil war. 🧐

If judges can decide if a pregnant woman lives or dies - Dobb's decision - then, as the CONSTITUTION states, a President who cited an insurection can be removed from the ballot. The people must be protected! Not everything should be decided by a vote.

@sqae8398

6 ай бұрын

The constitution in no way makes him ineligible to run. Just saying and making these things up and then hiring marketing firms to promote those ideas doesn't make them legitmate. The demonstrable coup in November 2020 is what the security state is trying to hide.

Very disappointed in Allen. If he was really for the constitution he would never be for the dems

But it’s okay for the lower court to make PARTISAN decisions, right Alan?!?!?!

What decision???? They never mention which court made a bad decision??????

@Elite59

6 ай бұрын

They are talking about the SC decision made in Florida, back when Bush ran against Gore. Dersh believes Gore won Florida and should have been elected president.

Since half the country seems to think he’s already guilty, declare a mistrial, he can’t get a fair shake.

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

And half the country thinks he is as innocent as a new born babe.

I don’t watch TV. Who is the woman with the Emmy? I like Alan in nearly everything. The Gore thing was a joke. Keep counting until we get the results that we want.

The worst decision was when The U.S. Supreme Court lifted restrictions imposed by lower courts on the ability of this adm to encourage social media companies to remove content.

What decision? Have they even reviewed Trump’s appeal regarding the so- called insurrection?

@malenurse1999

6 ай бұрын

There is no appeal as he has never been charged with insurrection

@diegojines-us9pc

6 ай бұрын

which is a criminal charge. the 14th is about being qualify. like being 35. is he charged with not being 35?

@The1stDukeDroklar

6 ай бұрын

@@diegojines-us9pc If there was an accusation that he was under 35 and they would not accept his birth certificate, then yes, it would go to court if they wanted to prove he was ineligible.

@carolluther1625

6 ай бұрын

​@@malenurse1999there is an appeal filed because of Colorado removing him from the ballot by the ACLJ.

@glenpaul3606

6 ай бұрын

The accusation of insurrection against Trump is absolutely ridiculous and 100% unwarranted. This is simply another attempt by the corrupt Democrats to interfere with the upcoming 2024 election which they know they cannot win against Trump. Those who brought these charges should be arrested, charged and imprisoned. SCOTUS should dismiss this charge and order all states to leave Trump on the ballot. THIS IS WHAT WE THE PEOPLE WANT AND THEY ARE IN PLACE TO SERVE US...NOT THE CORRUPT DEMOCRAT PARTY.

Upholding Obama Care was a pretty bad decision.

@mikewurlitzer5217

6 ай бұрын

The CACA legislation was CACA from the beginning, passed by people with CACA for brains, before anyone could read all the CACA. {CACA=Can't Afford Care Act}.

@nicasio1979

6 ай бұрын

Do you have a health care that is better than obama care? If you have then that’s not a problem.

@user-jv5cu4hz3q

6 ай бұрын

Obamacare, Romney care, is working well.

@granolafunk6192

6 ай бұрын

@@nicasio1979 Your question does not make any sense. He literally cannot have any other than obamacare.

@benobeno9203

6 ай бұрын

what do you have against Obamacare.Dont just hate something just because you are miserable. Obamacare is saving millions of your fellow Americans. Nobody asks you to get one if you don't want it

Lmao but the Democratic leaning Supreme Court of Florida in 2000 wasn't partisan. Got it....

@Milkmans_Son

6 ай бұрын

What's your point?

@joespinella7773

6 ай бұрын

@@Milkmans_Son Alan's a hypocrite

@Rmc3591

6 ай бұрын

Supreme Court is corrupt partisan and have no care about America. They are concerned about themselves

@sandym4839

6 ай бұрын

They were more moral then. Now almost all the top leaders in the Democrat party and every institution are Satanists.

@easygoing2479

6 ай бұрын

Was the composition of the Supreme Court justices in 2000 the same as it is today? Did the SCOTUS in 2000 include, for instance, a justice who is so out-of-touch that he/she doesn't even know what a woman is?

He won both times. Can we just stop pretending he did'nt?

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

The facts don’t support that conclusion. You know the adage that say if you tell the same lies often enough then people will start to believe it.

@todd8155

5 ай бұрын

@omniproductions8471 - If you are referring to Trump, first time 2016 he lost the popular vote, but won the office based on Electoral college. The 2nd time (2020) he lost both the popular vote (by almost 10 million), as well as the electoral college. So no we aren't going to agree that Trump won both times because the objective facts don't support your personal beliefs. I hope that's clear now.

Why would you criticize our supreme court who ruled that corporations are people, and money is free speech? In my view the court is illegitimate with several conservative justices who should have been liberal, but the president at the time was not allowed to choose them. When a correct decision is reached it is appealed for eternity until the decision is overturned. It's too bad our justice system isn't about justice. It's about technicalities and lawyers. If I did any of the illegal things that rich people, and our congress have done I would be in prison before I could take a breath.

The most important thing to remember. or learn, is that many representatives of the southern states actually voted in favor of succession or insurrection. It didn’t require a conviction because they had, by their own signature or affidavit, admitted to it. Trump never advocated anything other than using the constitution itself to dispute a questionable result.

@totostamopo

6 ай бұрын

He advocated staying in power despite the vote of the people!

@michaelalbert8474

6 ай бұрын

@@totostamopo Who??

Those days with his partner Jeffery Epstein will stay with Alan forever.

Allen is a Proud Liberal Democrat, He is Responsible for this. They all are.

@heatherhall7899

6 ай бұрын

I wouldn't go that far. There is a breed of older Democrats who use the word liberal to mean that they support the Constitutional freedoms - freedom of speech, religion, assembly, etc. RFK Jr. is another one. Our job is to open the eyes of those Democrats and help them see how illiberal and corrupt their party has become. Wouldn't having the Democrat Party reformed from within be preferable to having to run against the corrupt party they are now for the indefinite future?

@diegojines-us9pc

6 ай бұрын

but made a living off guilty right wing republicans in court. and he lost more than he won.

@seveglider8406

6 ай бұрын

What is Dershowitz responsible for? Be specific!

No Representation!!!!

Excellent point, Courts stay out of the election process! Let the people of the U.S. FREELY elect the person that they (the people) want to elect-PERIOD, END OF STORY!

@Sarah-im3lp

6 ай бұрын

Not as long as we have a Constitution!

@mikelee6936

6 ай бұрын

@@Sarah-im3lp As long as the constitution is upheld.

@atticusfinch3931

6 ай бұрын

Because he will win and everyone knows it . Up hold the constitution ya ok until it comes to their right to bear arms then the constitution goes out the window then free speech that to goes out the window . Democrats only want the constitution when it benefits fits them , didn’t they say it’s a two hundred year old piece of paper it needs to be re written ? Yes thy did

@stalker7892

6 ай бұрын

El Chapo for president.

@michaelthomas9243

6 ай бұрын

The people DID vote for whom they wanted in 2020. But Trump refused to accept it and what a mess for the country. What makes you think if Trump loses in 2024 he will concede then?

Never changed, never convicted.

@theowl3756

6 ай бұрын

You are misinformed. Trump has been indicted for 91 criminal charges in four different jurisdictions.!!! In addition, he has already been convicted of sexual assault and has to pay at least $10,000,000, with the possibility of much bigger punitive damages in the next trial.

@richardmesser1091

6 ай бұрын

Coming soon

God Bless you Alan .

Dersh own college students are laughing at him 😂 the guy flip flops more than a flounder out of water

@diegojines-us9pc

6 ай бұрын

sad he is training kids to go to jail for trump.

@FreeKhazaria

6 ай бұрын

@@diegojines-us9pc You know he is very anti-Trump, he just thinks it's incredibly dangerous and wrong for states to determine who eligible for a Federal election

@robthom09

6 ай бұрын

I remember during OJ hearing, he literally made stuff up to confuse juries, as though the murders were possibly gang related.

In Bush v Gore SCOTUS was ruling on legislated recount procedures, not unconstitutionally inserting itself into resolving a disputed election. At the time Bush v Gore was addressed by SCOTUS the FL election ballots hadn't even been counted yet so there wasn't yet a disputed election to begin with.

@garyjackson3531

6 ай бұрын

That's not even remotely true.

@curtismatsune3147

6 ай бұрын

@@garyjackson3531 Translation: "I got nuthin' except mindless butt-hurt over the truth."

@DavidFrisch

6 ай бұрын

Dems wanted certain areas recounted and not the whole state which is by law

@heatherhall7899

6 ай бұрын

Bush v. Gore was a good decision. Dershowitz is biased. Here's the problem with Gore's position. He wanted to count hanging and dimpled chads as votes and he wanted to throw out butterfly ballots as confusing. BUT, he only wanted to count chads and toss out ballots in deeply Democratic districts. SCOTUS correctly said that you have to count the whole state or no district. Quite right!

@chordsofgratitude2073

6 ай бұрын

ALL preplanned .... leading to this, Tyranny

I have to disagree with him. They are guidelines and requirements to hold the office of the President. That is clearly written in the Constitution. You have to be at least 35 years of age and you have to be a natural born citizen. And according to the 14th amendment section three there is another Qualifying requirement. Now the real question is did did trump violate this requirement. How can you be taken away? A person right to choose when the person you want To choose is not eligible in the first place. This will be determined by the supreme court.

@theowl3756

6 ай бұрын

Dershowitz says just let the voters decide..!!! So, according to Dershowitz, all the criminals he defended can run for president, regardless of Date of Birth, Place of Birth, and Criminal Record. And this guy supposedly has read the constitution. ..LOL

So, if I understand correctly, he thinks justice should be left in the hands of the citizens, not the courts. Does that include mob lynching? Is that theory valid for all citizens? What if you committed a crime and you're not on any ballot? Does he imply a two-tier justice system, one for the ordinary citizen and one for the politicians?

Citizen's United case gave us the end of bipartisanship in Congress. Would call that case the worst decision. All hail the mighty donors and their special interests!

Dershowitz is a expert on law. But dems don't want anyone telling them the law.

@bonnenaturel6688

6 ай бұрын

he better be, he has to defend why he was on Epstein's plane.

@larryroberts4984

6 ай бұрын

@@bonnenaturel6688 he was Epstein lawyer

@stansmith4511

6 ай бұрын

How rich!

@user-oo9tw1cb2c

6 ай бұрын

Alan is not an honest man swings with the Wind a hypocrite if ever I've seen one. He knows it is for the courts to decide.

@sophiaestella5611

6 ай бұрын

@@larryroberts4984 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣A perfect example of massaging the facts...

THANK YOU! In a democracy THE PEOPLE decide who is president!!!

@AlanRoehrich9651

6 ай бұрын

Fortunately, the United States is *not* and never has been a democracy. The United States is a Constitution based representative Republic.

@totostamopo

6 ай бұрын

Yep the people- not a president that doesn't like that the people voted for his opponent and so whines that the vote was rigged and begins corruptly trying to get states to change their votes!

@user-ho2ej5lx8d

6 ай бұрын

We are a constitutional republic, not a democracy.

@ericgranberg8893

6 ай бұрын

America is NOT a Democracy.

"I don't even like massages" - Dershowitz.

This man flew the Epstien express.

You are isolating "judging someone guilty" before due process. Could he have done it? Sure. Do you KNOW he did it? No. Then why are you trying to punish someone that hasn't been found of wrong doing? These democrats bro I swear...

This could lead to the electorate being invalidated.

No one mentioned the 150 F B I AGENTS IN THE PROTEST EXCITING ALL UNARMED PROTEST

Citizens United was the worst decision the court has made in modern times.

As a lawyer, he knows perfectly well that we put legal decisions before judges and juries, not up for a vote by the whole population of the US.

@rosc2022

6 ай бұрын

He's not talking about LITERALLY putting Trump's guilt or innocence up for a public vote. As much as I wish it could be true that Americans wouldn't vote a known criminal into office, sadly, the voters of DC elected Berry back into the mayor's office after he served time for smoking crack (as mayor). I still can't believe that DC voters thought he was their best option. But just look at the effort the DA's are putting into creating the President Trump circus. How can that not get a lot of Democrat voters' attention that something is off?

@freezingcathedral

6 ай бұрын

​@@rosc2022because anybody that votes is an npc.

@BM-uk3sh

6 ай бұрын

@@rosc2022 - Well, Barry was prosecuted right?. What is your problem with Trump been prosecuted?. Both committed crimes. You seem to be against that. Is a world of contradictions if a person is a felon he cannot vote, some say that once you become a criminal regardless of paying back you should not be able to vote, but an indicted or even convicted Trump should be able to not just vote but run for the presidency. Can you see how stupid we look to the world?. 14.3 doesn't say anything about past crimes except for been an insurrectionist that was/is a public official and swore an oath. Because Trump attempted to stop the legal transfer of power ordered by the Constitution he is an insurrectionist. On Jan. 20, 2017 he became a public official and swore an oath. So 14.3 applies. And just to be clear 14.3 doesn't requires a conviction it only needs participation or supporting. And for the moving of the goal post been made by stating that a conviction is required, well, it is not. Ex-Rep. George Santos was just removed from Congress without a conviction. He was removed because there is evidence that he violated his oath and or the ethics/conduct of his office. He has trials scheduled this year just like Trump and George Santos was an elected sitting Representative and he was expelled again without a criminal trial or conviction but just on the available evidence. With Trump there is already plenty of evidence.

@eugene7518

6 ай бұрын

Innocent till proven guilty in a court of law

@jacuzzihot

6 ай бұрын

However, with money buying judges and not even an ethics base line present and no other agency recognized with oversight, that would be a very toxic and unsanitary attitude. We have the proof that morality alone cannot keep this judges's hands out of the cookie jar. ANY judge should refrain very far from widely recognized acts of bribery or blackmail. The Supreme Court should never be in any situation even remotely suggesting possible corruption. WITH EXTRAORDINARY POWERS COMES EXTRAORDINARY RESPONSIBILITIES Likewise policemen should be held to a much higher standard. Police immunity is no longer justified, seen the overwhelming cases of police abuse and the continued police brutality that so typically starts with a traffic violation and ends up with a handcuffed person dead, after being assaulted by several cops, eager and trained and equipped to kill. A case like Tyre Nichols could only happen if there is a general attitude that cops can get away with murder, rather than will be held to a higher standard of accountability. It is absurd to see criminals roam free and innocent people targeted for murder by police. This is what happens when there is lack of oversight and lack of enforcement of "code". If the public does not trust the police, we have a problem. Besides Superior Judges are not selected for their integrity, but for their non-integrity, willing to bend towards a political agenda. So unless we do stand with impunity and not with impartiality or integrity of judges.....well if that is the case, then let's put a sign in front of the Superior Court, that this is what it is, without pretense. The sign could read: "Impunity, neither Integrity nor Impartiality", preferable in Latin. If the public does not trust the judges, we have a problem. In either case of police or judges, we are talking about public servants, paid by tax payers money. So if these entities become self-serving, we have a serious problem. Inaction is not justified. Suggestion that the public should not protest is inherently undemocratic. We need these entities to be widely respected to have a practical balance of powers. If not, an insurrection would be a much desired solution.

Gore was like a god. He predicted the end of the world in 2000 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

@astronautical1082

6 ай бұрын

No, he just made empty-headed conservatives feel ignorant, selfish, and narcissistic.

@jeffreyforeman5031

6 ай бұрын

you made that one up

@aj-2savage896

6 ай бұрын

Now THAT'S an inconvenient truth.

@marcusmaddox2176

6 ай бұрын

​@@jeffreyforeman5031You never heard of Y 2 K ?

@user-sz5pb9lq1n

6 ай бұрын

What happened?

What is happening to America and the Supreme Court. HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU, AND YOUR FAMILY PROFESSOR DERSHOWITZ.

Citizens United: Democracy for sale.

What could be more insurrectionist, and actively attempting to overthrow a government. Than a select few denying the _people_ to equally vote for whoever they want to...as is our right. Our civil rights, as retained by the people, have been horribly and blatantly violated. And yet what mechanism is there to criminally punish those who are actively doing it?

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

It is not your right to vote for whomever you want. It is your right to for any eligible candidate that you want.

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

@@Aireck174 What are you talking about? The Democrats’ primary has multiple people on the ballot

@Aireck174

6 ай бұрын

@@froglady7491 There could be 500 people on the ballot and it doesn't matter when democrats cancel the primary. Democrats already canceled the one in Florida.

@ravenslaves

6 ай бұрын

@@froglady7491 No. I can still vote for whomever I want to _as a right_ . If they're eligible to assume that office is another matter entirely. And let's not forget that political parties are private organizations. They're perfectly free to forego the primary process altogether, and choose their candidate any way they choose to. A caucus just being one example. Either way, trying to derail a political party's _choice_ of candidate certainly has to go down as a low point in our Republic, and it certainly sets out to interfere with an election.

@froglady7491

6 ай бұрын

@@ravenslaves Oh you can vote for Santa Claus if you want to, but your vote won’t be counted. If the candidate you vote for is not eligible, your vote won’t be counted. And if the Party’s candidate is ineligible, do you really want to trick people to vote for him by putting him on the ballot, knowing that he can’t be elected? Don’t you want to get this question answered before voting starts so that the Republicans have a valid choice. Or do you want it decided after the primary vote is already decided?

Let the people decide? Don’t follow the constitution, let the voters decide. That is difficult to square.

That's exactly what i said when they first started the BS they are getting the cart before the horse FJB

Like the way the cultists are so selective with which Constitutional Amendments they respect.

Trump said, “You have the right to PEACEFULLY protest.” HOW IS THAT AN INSURRECTION? Short answer: IT’S NOT!

@cfb1923

6 ай бұрын

I'm pretty sure "fight like helll" did not help Trump's case

@totostamopo

6 ай бұрын

Yes, peacefully protest the completely legal election that I just lost. Do you not see that total corruption and illegality in that? He lost the election and knew it. He is a liar.

@robthom09

6 ай бұрын

No those words are not, but those words are not the issue. He was excited about the violence he incited and he knew that his words were welcoming those wanting to kill Mike Pence, and he did nothing to stop it. Only 3 hours later did he say anything to defuse, but now he lies and pretends that he tried to defuse hours earlier.

@willmont8258

6 ай бұрын

@@cfb1923 He said "peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard" That is not an insurrection.

@willmont8258

6 ай бұрын

@yamamoto2221 Who carried a gun into the Capital? That is another phony claim.

Overturning Roe v Wade was not one of the worst decisions when the case that was overturned was itself THE worst decision in the Court's entire history.

@keithziegler8881

6 ай бұрын

Actually you're wrong. There was nothing wrong with Roe V Wade as it helped to recognize what women already know and new and that's it they have the right to an abortion and people like you have no say in the matter The Supreme Court overturning of that was a travesty and it was a clear attempt to steal the human rights of women an attempt that is now blowing up in their faces, and Republicans are going to continue to pay for that CRYING in every election that is to come

My only comment is that there shouldn't be a discussion about so many "democratic" justices voted one way and so many "republican" justices voted another way. It implies that they, the justices, are only "voting" based on their politics. Justices should be known for how they defend our rights enshrined in our Constitution. Truly sad if one party is against Constitutional rights and one is for them...

It’s ridiculous the millions of dollars it takes to run for political office. Publicly fund all viable candidates equally and may the best man or woman win period.

Here in America we live by the Constitution and the rule of law.

@ericgranberg8893

6 ай бұрын

Not according to Trump supporters.

@combatmedic91-b76

6 ай бұрын

WRONG TRUMP SUPPORTERS LOVE CONSTITUTION REPUBLIC NOT LEFTIST TROLLS. LEFTIST THINK AMERICA IS A DEMOCRACY WRONG AND THEY ARE LIARS. WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY.

@retirednavy8720

6 ай бұрын

@@ericgranberg8893 Name the law Trump broke. Can you do that?

@ericgranberg8893

6 ай бұрын

@@retirednavy8720 Insurrection.

Interesting that Derschy would ignore the Florida Supreme Court's disgusting decision while calling the US Supreme Court's reversal of that decision 'not their finest hour'. Pathetic.

Notice that he didn't criticize the Florida supreme court when it ruled in favor of Gore.

Dipshitowitz should be more concerned about his own problems at this point.

A good decision on election uncertainty is to order a new election. Electing politicians regardless of office is NEVER urgent. If the repeating elections took six months that saves voters from bad political decisions and wasting money paying them. Only politicians believe they are important and essential. If a politician appeals to voters they will win on the first round otherwise give the voters ample opportunity to make a decision backed by the majority.

@keithziegler8881

6 ай бұрын

Well there was no election uncertainty with the 2020 election. Trump tried to stir election uncertainty amongst his sycophantic followers but the facts did not support a claim of uncertainty therefore the claim is dismissed

The following is what the Supreme Court in Utah said and in 1968 about The U.S. Supreme Court. > The United States Supreme Court, as at present constituted, has departed from the Constitution as it has been interpreted from its inception and has followed the urgings of social reformers in foisting upon this Nation laws which even Congress could not constitutionally pass. It has amended the Constitution in a manner unknown to the document itself. While it takes three fourths of the states of the Union to change the Constitution legally, yet as few as five men who have never been elected to office can by judicial fiat accomplish a change just as radical as could three fourths of the states of this Nation. As a result of the recent holdings of that Court, the sovereignty of the states is practically abolished, and the erst while free and independent states are now in effect and purpose merely closely supervised units in the federal system. < Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d 266 (Utah 1968)

How does a sitting president throw an insurrection against himself?

@cfb1923

6 ай бұрын

I guess you missed the part about how all the violence occurred during the electoral count certification. It was interrupted and delayed which was the first lack of complete peaceful transfer of power in history. All based on lies. Trump lost in over 60 courts some with Trump-appointed judges. Why? There has never been one iota of evidence to suggest that there was fraud that swung the election to Biden. That was just Trump grooming the masses.

@seveglider8406

6 ай бұрын

When he or she tries to prevent a president elect from taking office after he or she won a fair and free presidential election! Quit whining! Trump LOST!

@willmont8258

6 ай бұрын

@@cfb1923 Strange how the normal checks and safeguards against mail ballot fraud were suspended (because of COVID) at the same time many States sent out millions of mail ballots, even though mail ballots are the easiest way to cheat. And no one was even allowed to check for fraud, because that would be "voter suppression".

I agree

🚫🗽 🇺🇸 No freedom of speech here , Good bye Forbes 👋👋👋♦️♦️♦️

@realtruenorth

6 ай бұрын

We see your speech, sooo, what are you talking about?

@DavidLouisLouis-qh9ni

6 ай бұрын

@@realtruenorth My comment was 🚫 erased , I'm not wasting time repeating it, , I'm being systematically shadow boxed everything is In 2 's.

@realtruenorth

6 ай бұрын

@@DavidLouisLouis-qh9ni probably somebody flagged it, not youtube, just another person.

1:07 Supposedly they did 2020, take the vote away from "We the People".

@mikewurlitzer5217

6 ай бұрын

As every bulk mailed ballot is 100% unverifiable once separated from it's envelope, there is one thing for certain about the 2020 election. JUNK MAIL gave us a JUNK MALE for president.

I'm not sure why Forbes wants to keep giving a platform to an apologist for Genocide. Sick.

Nothing this lawyer said is in anyway a legal argument

What was the ruling????

@raptango_na6199

6 ай бұрын

I think the Colorado scouts pulling Trump off the ballot

@emmacharlenewilliams1460

6 ай бұрын

@@raptango_na6199 Thanks. I wish they’d be more specific. I couldn’t believe the national Supreme Court would do that.

Alan you could say that about every 5-4 decision

@jasonwhite6463

6 ай бұрын

Maybe but every 5-4 vote doesn't decide the outcome of a presidential election like it did in 2000.

I am one of those on the political right. Having said that I believe Alan Dershowitz is one of the best thinkers in America today. He would be a fair and honest person to serve on our Supreme Court. An honest honorable man.

I'll vote when I get one of those electoral ones. Until then, it's a waist of time

Even worse than overturning roe v wade was the actual roe decision itself

@heatherhall7899

6 ай бұрын

That doesn't make sense. If Roe was a terrible decision (and even Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg admitted it was), it should have been overturned.

@thegreatbambino3358

6 ай бұрын

@heatherhall7899 oh I agree it should have been overturned. Dershowitz was saying overturning roe was the worst decision, which I disagreed with

@seveglider8406

6 ай бұрын

Every Woman should have the right to control their own uterus. It's their decision, not Your decision or any legislative branch of government to make!

@thegreatbambino3358

6 ай бұрын

@@seveglider8406 Oh yeah that's written in the constitution. I forgot.

@raymondaten2179

6 ай бұрын

​@seveglider8406 most women who want abortions already did have control of there uterus when they opened there legs.

Since we vote for criminals all the time, why is Trump being singled out?

@bryanoliver5550

6 ай бұрын

Donald Trump is Donald Trump we know it , they know it , but they are scared to death (not literally) of him being President , it`s true . Vote in 2024 Presidential Elections , in November . Remember now .

@totostamopo

6 ай бұрын

A criminal who abides by a free and fair election is not the same as a criminal who refuses to do so.

@willmont8258

6 ай бұрын

@@totostamopo Why was it fair, when the usual safeguards and checks against fraud were suspended just for the 2020 election? If there was ever a election where fraud could have made the difference in the outcome, it would be 2020. Millions of ballots mailed out with no security checks first, even though we have been told that mail ballots are the easiest way to cheat, yet instead we are told this was the most secure election in history?

Amen!!!

The court is compromised. Which one of the justices ?

The term "insurrection" is only used by a tyrannical and corrupt governing body historically. What does that say for the current governing body?

@johnwattdotca

6 ай бұрын

It says you need to look up "insurrection" in a dictionary.

@Sarah-im3lp

6 ай бұрын

It says NOTHING!

@user-qm8bc4bu1t

6 ай бұрын

But it's weird as you are going against the veto system. If people voted for Biden then a group of people decides that it is not valid and threatens through an insurrection it is scary as then it means you don't care about the votes.

@YZ250W1

6 ай бұрын

Donnie only needed 11780 votes to win like a traitor. Fake electors for everyone!

@granolafunk6192

6 ай бұрын

@@johnwattdotca Insurrection is defined in the constitution. That is the only definition that applies here.

Politics and Law dont mix

Dude cites Debbs' prison sentence for insurrection and then with a straight face says we don't do that in America.

As bad as Bush was, it would have been worse under Gore.