I hope everyone can learn from this line “the male urge to own someone in a conversation against your own self interest.” Learn from that one well kids

I am never more pogged than I am when react court is posted

Getting offended that someone doesn't like a food you've prepared is so petty. You can give them a little jab for being picky and once they leave say "Wow can you believe Janet doesn't like carrots??" but if you're having a stern conversation with your son because his wife hates gravy you need to get some real problems

NL's capacity to balance out relationships and knowing how to keep people on the respective teams is insane to me. He has it all figured out.

oh boy! a hot steamy new episode of "I'm glad I'm not these people"!

When people refer to their mom or dad as just "mom" like "and then mom came home", it always sounds like they're some omniscient being that were all aware of. Always makes me giggle.

1st guy got NL to defend a picky eater, and that means a lot.

One member of my family is vegan. On holidays we simply make one or two vegan dishes for her, its not that difficult to fix. People just look for conflict

having a trusted person have a spare key could be very useful in the future and if his mom won’t just go in there whenever she wants and they don’t have bad relationship then idk what’s the issue.. tho him thinking he is the sole owner bc she was loving enough to pay for both of them is INSANE

I'm pretty sure that 92.6% of AITA posts are the other person, playing the role of the OP and telling the story completely from their own point of view and bias. The other 86.2% are complete fiction. Unrelated, but math is awesome kids!

“Do not stand at my grave and cry

24:52

I'm usually not looking at the screen when watching these videos so when NL reads out a certified reddit response like at

I sometimes think about what it must be like to just get absolutely eviscerated on AITA. I couldn’t bear reading all of that sort of stuff (insane personal attacks, etc)

35:26

that wedding one was such clearly fabricated rage-bait lol

NL the law does not usually work like you were suggesting. In fact, it is extremely common for contracts to be nullified due to hiding something in fine print or other duplicitous means and any "ridiculous" terms in an EULA would not hold up in court. A court would also almost certainly look at the totality of the evidence in regards to determining ownership rather than just saying "one names on the title, my hands are tied". This obviously varies by jurisdiction but holds generally true for NA.

i’ll never understand people who invite couples then they say “plus ones” like who is the plus one? someone in that couple is an after thought??? just say we invited couples and didn’t allow plus ones

Regarding the house key discussion: Something I've realised is some people make a conflict out of "principles". "It's not that bad that my MIL has a housekey but I'll keep defending this point because I'm annoyed I wasn't asked before or (in this case) because I don't like it and want to win this fight no matter what".

insane man who says he saved up on his own then tells us he didn’t have to pay for anything.. how is he missing it