Aircraft Carrier Air Defense System Shooting Down Missiles, Jets - Su-34 - C-RAM CIWS - Simulation
[Zone 3000] Aircraft Carrier Air Defense System Shooting Down Missiles, Hostile Jets Su-34 - C-RAM CIWS in Action
This video is a simulation.
Minimum required PC configuration for running simulations (previously used setup):
Graphics Card:amzn.to/45A8umy
CPU:amzn.to/47NV9cu
Good value for money!
Current dedicated PC configuration that I am using:
Graphics Card:amzn.to/3YHFXJu
CPU:amzn.to/44kL8QN
※All of this is based on my actual usage experience. If you're interested in simulations, feel free to take it as a reference. It's also great for running the latest games smoothly. Thank you for your questions and comments~!
Subscribe for more videos: bit.ly/3m4yy5w
I love to make military simulation videos. I hope you enjoy!
If you're reading this and enjoyed the video please leave a like & remember to subscribe!
Thanks for watching!
Пікірлер: 398
Jim Powell speaking. This is truly amazing. As a Navy vet who served in a fighter squadron on the USS Ranger in the late 60’s, we had nothing on that carrier like they have today. When you have an investment of billions of dollars, for just one carrier, and that does not include all the aircraft, you must protect it. Great to see the innovation and commitment of the Navy.
@garypadilla4408
2 жыл бұрын
I AGREE GARY A PADILLA USS RANGER UNDER THEN PRESIDENT BUSH SENIOR CREATOR OF SG1 STARGATE TO JIM POWELL AWSOME FOR THE NAVY!
@dustinmurphy5557
2 жыл бұрын
This is a video game
@seadragonyt5391
Жыл бұрын
Uh oh.
@laff__8821
Жыл бұрын
@James Libby it's still simulated as precise as possible
@randalcook325
Жыл бұрын
I agree with Mr. Powell. The navy would not spend the money on these massive war machines if they were not able to successfully able to defend them and the naval personnel that man's them. God Bless the United States and our Armed Forces.
Your channel is always a joy to watch
So beautiful, I want to play modern warships again :
@sarancha_yt
Жыл бұрын
Точно
@keptspace4694
Жыл бұрын
Yes
I could watch this forever lol I just love it.
This is actually a good way to waste the enemies C-RAM bullets so that the jet fighters have a better chance at attacking
@Brutalchaos2
Жыл бұрын
C-RAMS (Counter rocket, artillery, and mortar) aren't used to take down jets, they would use SM type missiles.
@Keatoil
Жыл бұрын
@@Brutalchaos2 ik this is just a game lol
I literally thought this was real for a minute until i noticed that shading was off for clouds showing "depth" and the smoke from destroyed aircraft.....i sure hope you are either independently building PC wartime simulation games or are working with members of game manufacturers in the likes of DCS and Vtol, outstanding job!!!
@tommybestonso6509
2 жыл бұрын
Imagine if you took out all existing coms to a major fleet/vessels & then convinced the country/commanders with high-tech grafix that they experienced catastrophic loss of assets in battle with great video of their best assets destroyed & helpless long enough to promt a successful surrender before they realize they had not realized they hadn't lost most their fleet & were watching a damn good movie... what's that old saying warriors win battles, logistics win wars ! What would a commander do that believes he has nothing left to command ?
China has adopted the doctrine of saturation attack: not one cruise missile or suicide drone at a time, but 80 or 200 -- because they are cheap while the target value is high.
@bighands69
2 жыл бұрын
And what you think US battle groups will not be saturating the battle space? Those C-Ram systems saturate volume space they are not a direct hit fire line.
Been looking everywhere, how do you get the Cram to shoot red tracers I stead of the vanilla white Tracers?
You got a LOT more improvement that has to made to become video game puppet master.
Hell of a light show performance from our military.
@TomeSouza-dk7xj
6 ай бұрын
military (Hell of a light show performance from our versalsour ats wordy que lovas biode youns mode con't odo evexeandado ekos angour hiogs tos poor not my tems is song os wdoly Just juss zisa 5:00
one simple Poseidon takes care of the whole fleet. These high speed guns are toys for video games.
we never had that many cwis on the nimitz , now and days they have nato sea sparrow missile system ... CWIS is ship based and CRAM is land based.. EXCELLENT SIMULATOR THOUGH
Wow Amazing :)
@alexblinoff5241
2 жыл бұрын
Ещё ни кто не погиб на симуляторе...
@rockstargaming951
2 жыл бұрын
@@alexblinoff5241 🙂
Nice CGI. Almost got me ;)
@TCDdpa
Жыл бұрын
Got to be kidding!This is game console CGI. Not even on the same planet with Hollywood CGI🤣
10 minutes of pure American freedom
Puisant tir
Wtf they dropping them jets like flies!! 😱
Add lasers and then you will have a total defense systems
all are technology and contemporary weapons knowing easy ways this is amazing for us.
DAMN !!! I want a gun like that !!!!!
If laser defense system can work,it will crush incoming attacks almost 100%。
@Not-TheOne
2 жыл бұрын
yeah, if you could have them up 24/7 with with enough power and enough cooling, it'll be amazing. With enough power you could take down almost anything. Never need any kinetic or chemical weapons (as in explosive), except for very far off targets like long range attack planes, as lasers wont be effective on very long range due to crap like dust in the air bringing down the power. Railguns would also be great, but not guided at long range, though, I've always wondered if, say, you launch a projectile via a railgun and then the last few kilometers, have a small rocket or electrically moved fins to guide it for fine movement.
@qtamnguyen
2 жыл бұрын
We will make submerged laser ∆∆
@sagartech4622
2 жыл бұрын
Laser defence system only have India
@salmeza85
2 жыл бұрын
What if you send...200 planes.
@user-md5ps2og9v
2 жыл бұрын
Забавное заблуждение.
Están bonitos los muñequitos esos
Wow
i see the ships bridge has a nice flashing light at the top of the mast, a nice aiming point? lol
@bighands69
2 жыл бұрын
If the enemy can see that light they are in serious trouble.
Nice game ...
ありがとうございます!
If you sank a US carrier the next thing you would see is a stealth bomber
@Madmok128
2 жыл бұрын
Next to impossible
@Sandhill1988
2 жыл бұрын
You wouldn't see it... that's the point.
Imagina cuantos barcos se necesitan para parar todos los misiles. , es un sueño huagiro ,
I wonder how many incoming missiles would it take to overwhelm these phalanx systems. The simulation basically showed concentrated fire on one missle at a time.
@scoshyg5133
Жыл бұрын
They were literally firing at multiple missiles and aircraft at the same time. What a video where are you watching?
@emptyforrest
Жыл бұрын
wouldnt take many anti ship missiles to saturate the phalanx system.
Now I call that a buzzsaw
Buena SIMULACION... JEJEJEJEJE DEBEN INCLUIRLA EN CALL OF DUTTY
Nice video game
Is this real or computer generated? Doesn't look real at all. I'm sure they're capable of it, no doubt there.
@pid__5234
2 жыл бұрын
I think it's made in a simulatior, but i may be wrong.
@Charly214
2 жыл бұрын
But the C-RAM is real
@sathishd8453
2 жыл бұрын
Yes bro
This game it's realy Nice.
As i remember we only had 1 cwis and that was portside aft of cat 3 & 4
Isso aí é pareo pra mísseis hipersonicos?
Kenapa kita tidak mengunakan kecerdasan kita untuk perDAMAIan di Bumi ini???
Ist that Combat Action,or Tests ? Are the aircrafts flight by real pilots ? Amazing firepower sweet Video thanks
@Lerxn
Жыл бұрын
No sir that is a simulation on a game
Se observa defensa para vuelo rasante tbn. Queda la opción sumergido rasante.
Whoever hears a voice should treat it as a servant.
Os lazeres são mais ágeis e eficiente
Genial los saludo yo el facha dj pitty mendoza
La verdad que se puede decir , hay qué bonitos , los fuegos artificiales , hasta cantan la hora * .
Que cantidad de armamento .de misiles y munisiones tiene un portaaviones tiene y que tiempo puede defenderse de ataques aereos y de misiles enemigos
Hope that works in missile saturation attacks, which the fleet is likely to face in a war in the Pacific ocean.
@bighands69
2 жыл бұрын
Battleships in a war will not be on their own they will be part of battle groups and they will have aircraft in the air as well. And the volume that they will unleash will be far greater than the video game shows. Those C-Rams are not a single line of fire they fill up the volume of space with explosive rounds. Those tracers you are see are one in every ten rounds.
@juniorleslie4804
2 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 Yes I know tracers are one in ten rounds. But even with a 4500 per minute rate of fire for the C-RAMs?; will it be enough, to prevent saturation attacks from overwhelming the point defenses of the CIWS?
Dibujos animados presenta!!....
That's the sea Ram Gatling gun in action but that's like four or five maybe six of them
Needs the NEW LAZERS.
¡¡¡ faaa, loco !!! Buenísimo éste video juego. ¿ dónde lo consigo?
Bonita la película gringa
Why in the Hell would a warship have its lights on during combat at night?
@tosti23
Жыл бұрын
Its a PC Game.......
We have a dead mall in Bradenton FL
That's at Liberty Bell it rings loud don't miss
It's kinda pretty.
India should adopt this technology.
El piloto de un avión de combate dispara un misil desde unos 10 km y no tiene necesidad de acercar a la defensa aérea.
@amaurimartinez5900
2 жыл бұрын
Si y te recuerdo también q este barco lleva a bordo un escuadrón FA18 y uno F35 q avioncito se podrá pegar a 10 km de este portaaviones jjjjjjjjjjjjj
@gerardoa.uzcategui.8937
2 жыл бұрын
Igualmente es neutralizado 😄
@justiciero35
2 жыл бұрын
Estos aparatos modernos alcanzan 30 kilómetros
El motor de un fuera Borda ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️🛫🛫🛬🛬
Good job america
Single. Missile. Air. Carrier is. Goin down
que buen juego nintendo
système anti-missile de quel pays?
Los misiles hipersónicos que Rusia tiene pueden alcanzar velocidades hasta de veces la velocida del sonido
@jorgeserrano2240
2 жыл бұрын
Los aviones de quinta y sexta generación vuelan a tres y cuatro veces la velocidad del sonido según fuentes especializadas.
@gerardoa.uzcategui.8937
2 жыл бұрын
Adónde leíste esa propaganda?🤔
@manuterae9377
2 жыл бұрын
Hijo! Con la Mary Jane. Ves pasar todo rápido!
@fernandoboggiano4408
2 жыл бұрын
Estados Unidos tiene misiles que viajan hasta 9 veces la velocidad del sonido.
@eybicavi4535
2 жыл бұрын
Cuando quieras disparar a un misil hipersónico ya va estar destruido todo el barco
This is JUNK! CARTOONS
Watch it several times then you will realise it’s cgi at its finest. When the aircraft explode then plummet to the ground or sea why does the smoke trail follow them
@Circle_Sphere
2 жыл бұрын
Duh it says "simulation"
@stevemclennan2459
2 жыл бұрын
Duh. It does now it didn’t when I first watched it.
@yancysummer8467
2 жыл бұрын
Its a video game bro
Z tego co widzę jednak zwykłe działa potrafią zrobić cuda a nie te wydumane delikatne rakietki. Chyba żeby poszła nawała tak z setką pocisków na różnych trajektoriach. Ja to mówią mądrzy ludzie i Herkules dupa kiedy wrogów kupa.
Tự mình phải có vũ khí để bảo vệ chính mình, mới gọi là đệ thất hạm đội,
why do they look inefficient? is it because i am unfamiliar with the difficulty of shooting down something like that?
Cuándo derribe un misil hipersonico le creo..
Phanlans do not hava such ammo capacity.
Brasil🎉😂❤😢😮😅😊
Only in simulations you would have the option on/off (Or a cheat code) unlimited Ammo :) In reality the enemy (Russia) have installed in their Su's a Jamming device which was put into practice against an American warship. One split second: "No power".
@darcskies777
2 жыл бұрын
Still believing the Russian propaganda after what you've seen in Ukraine? Lol
@pathosofmine
Жыл бұрын
That's to assume if they still bother to maintain those systems
Much more accurately set fun to return fire.
ese portaaviones esta bien chingon me pregunto de quien es ese portaaviones bien diamadres China rusia europa o la potencia mas poderosa del mundo soyedinennyye shtaty Ameriki
This is a best case scenario for the enemy with traditional means. In close, stationary, no aircraft or escort fleet. You could I guess overwhelm it. But it would still take a lot of kit to kill it.
Why does a radar guided gun need tracers?
Esto es real o ficción ?
I hope the c ram can run day and night 24/7 continuously.
@bighands69
2 жыл бұрын
US battle groups are capable of remaining in battle for long periods of time. Think of how large the ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry.
@ringofasho7721
Жыл бұрын
That's some double redundancy there
Consulta cuantos peces mueren en estos sistemas de defensas?
@reyeskali3529
2 жыл бұрын
Te preocupas más por los peces que por los seres humanos que cosas no ?
@edgarramirez3283
2 жыл бұрын
Si podemos decirle señor al ese psicópata no le importa nadie, sino el poder y nadie se atreve a eliminarlo, sería lo mas justo ya que no ha tenido compasión con civiles, mujeres, niños etc.
Que pasa si los pilotos atacan volando a baja altura, digamos volando por debajo de la línea de cubierta?
@lemuria4684
2 жыл бұрын
A media/larga distancia no importa , el problema sería si el avión estuviera muy cerca ,en cuyo caso ni al avión le quedarían chances de maniobras , se estrellaría , o al menos eso pienso yo
@eybicavi4535
2 жыл бұрын
O atacan en forma de cruz... ya estan listos los barcos
They live in a very dreamy world. They're going to attack from all those targets, and that aircraft carrier is going to survive😄
@bighands69
2 жыл бұрын
US Aircraft carriers are extremely tough and would require massive missiles to actually hit them. In a real battle it would take constant hits from artillery that is by the way far more effective than a missile to take down those carriers. Here is the thing that most people do not realize is that carriers in a war would be part of a group and if a major world war was to break out the US would have a thousand of them active.
@KannanKannan-xw9jj
2 жыл бұрын
ஈஎ
@carlospalacios3115
2 жыл бұрын
@@bighands69¿ me entero! q estados unidos tienen mil portaaviones y q el fuego de artillería es mas efectiva q los misiles, mínimo vives bajo una piedra para hacer semejante comparación de fuego y precisión o eres estupido ya q todavia no e visto ninguna artillería con mas poder destructivo y precisión q el de un misil hipersónico con capacidad nuclear o un misil telmo bárico o misiles nucleares normales pero bueno segun tu logica los misiles no sirven contra un portaaviones por q me imagino q cuando le lanzen un ataque a esos portaaviones les lanzaran misiles relleno de flores y misiles de juguetes porq la única potencia con armas de verdad es estados unidos entonces y los demas paises son simples moscas en comparación a estados unidos q tiene según tu miles de de estos grupos de portaaviones jajajajajajajajaja a y respecto a si se llega a desatar una nueva guerra mundial de poco le servirá a estados unidos si tiene 11 portaaviones en servicio 66 de echo es el numero máximo q a construido estados unidos de los cuales muchos de ellos ya están inservibles o descontinuados y de esos 66 solo 11 están operativo y activos hoy en dia asi q no se de donde sacaste q estados unidos tiene mil portaaviones activos en espera de la próxima guerra mundial a otra cosa países potencia como rusia y china tienen en su arsenal misiles hipersónicos con capacidad nuclear capaces de destruir portaaviones enteros incluso muchos de los navíos escoltas de dicho portaaviones resultarian destruidos y muchos otros con daños irreparables sin hablar de la total perdida de las vidas humanas q serán carbonizadas al instante y los q no morirán por radiación y todo ese daño tan solo con un misil hipersónico con ojivas nucleares.!
Target practices with live fire
Wait wait.
is it animated?
I need stock in the co that makes this beautiful machine.
Ese sistema derribara tambien Planetas lejanos a años Luz, como el planeta pluton jaja
Es real. Broma. Nilo puedo creer
Question for anyone familiar with the iron dome defense system, could you theoretically link say( 4 )carriers (destroyers , even Ohio class ) & replicate a iron dome style defense between them ? It seems to me if possible you could severely cut in a lot of potential threats, Just wondering ?
@lindapowell117
2 жыл бұрын
I can say this, every aircraft carrier has great defenses around it and under it. So, all you need not worry about any carrier in dangerous waters.
@stuwest5862
Жыл бұрын
Putting 4 carriers in the same location would be a stupid idea.
@emptyforrest
Жыл бұрын
phalanx are rather short range. the probability of a hitting what they are shooting at drasticly decreeses the further away it is.
Que notre bon DIEU ET PUISSANT VOUS GUIDE ET VOUS DONNE la super puissance contre les ennemis un amazhigh musulman
En los simuladores derriban todo la realidad no se sabe porque no ha ocurrido
The defensive firepower on an aircraft carrier is awesome but how long can this coverage be sustained in the event of a concentrated multi-pronged attack? And what are the defenses against underwater threats..mines, torpedoes etc?
@bighands69
2 жыл бұрын
US battleships are part of groups. So that means the US right now can form about 11 such battle groups with each group able to put over 100 aircraft in the air. Think of how large those ships are now think of how much ammunition they can carry and unleash. Each Carrier group will have its own battle squadron that on its own would be impossible to take down never mind a carrier being present. In WW3 the US will have about 1000 carriers active.
@puny-tinsucks5102
Жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 the US navy has like 12 carriers, let's not get carried away here....lol
@fgm1197
Жыл бұрын
A carrier is never alone
@_samtakoi_
Жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 ну они величие свое на дне будут показывать после одной ракеты кинжал, запущенной с расстояния на котором авианосец даже об этом не узнает)
@_samtakoi_
Жыл бұрын
@@bighands69 100 самолетов 800 вертолетов 4 звездолета и это только на одном звездатом авианосце, а да еще шубы норковые три и два видемагнитофона))) Эпоха авианосцев уже похоронена, их можно потопить с российской базы на американской базе, даже выплыть не успеет)))
I love my india
and Poseidon swims under water
Potencia Rucia
درودبرشما خیلی هم ممنون از زحمات عجب ناو هواپیمابر وحشت ناکی😱
Baru di lapis kembali dari depan : 1. Di depan Sumba atau Sumba besar 2. Di depan sabu atau sawu 3. Di depan Rote atau roti 4. Di depan tsemau 5. Di depan TENAU ATAU KUOANG DI LEDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL PETI KEMAS, DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL KARGO, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL PELNI, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAOAL TENKER, DILEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL BATU BARA, DIELDAK KAPAL LAUT KAPAL SELAM DI LEDAK KAOAL LAUT KAPAL CURAH 6. DI DEOAN ATAPUPU SAMA SDA 7. DI DWOAN DILLI 8. DIDEOAN SEREWARU 9. DIDEOAN KAKABAHI 10. DIDEOAN PURA 11.DIDWOAN TEREWENG 12. DIDEOAN MARGETHA.13. DIDEOAN LEWOLEBA. 13. DIDEOAN ADINARA 14. DIDEOAN KARANTUKA FLORES TIMUR 15. DIKEMBALIKAN DIDEOAN KUPANG 🕋🕋🕋🕍🕍🕍🕋🕋🕋🕌🕌🕌🕋🕋🕋🏰🏰🏰🕋🕋🕋👍👍👍👍🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
un misil ipersonico no lo ven llegar
Yeah, like we’re gonna shoot directly at our own ships. 🤣 Plus we have lasers now anyways
Похож на видео игры
Well animation 😂
Missile command