I do not have a problem cocking the rifle, all you need is a quick swift pull on the cocking arm and bingo. I am 82 years of age and I also have two Weihrauch HW 97K rifles. Regards Mick.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @michaelhicks708...if it works for you, then that's all that matters. Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

I'm the proud owner of both the TX200 HC Mk3 "walnut stock" and the HW97K in blue laminate. I bought the TX200 on the advice that it was easier to service. I have found that the TX200 is easier to load although it only has a 3 quarter breach. The underlever i find easy to pull back and because there's no button to press a much easier loading mechanism. Shooting wise i prefer the blue laminate "smooth" stock and feel. I would say they're both very accurate and on a par. The HW97 is in my eyes better quality and comes much cheaper than the TX200. I wouldn't part with either.

@tatarugabriel4328

5 ай бұрын

Hello sir. This might sound odd but I like to push my airgun to it's limits, shooting beyond 100 meters. My first airgun was a Hatsan break barrel, quite a simple, cheap rifle. I was wondering if underlevers like the TX200 are more accurate to distance because the barrel is fixed. Or is it the inevitable curse of the springer air rifles that they inevitably loose accuracy to distance because of the double recoil (PCP's don't have it and are far more long range capable)

@awolwakefieldyorkshire

5 ай бұрын

@@tatarugabriel4328 I'm shooting at 30 yard max with the TX as it has a short barrel. I'm not sure if the fixed barrel is as important for accuracy as long as you have a decent engineered break barrel. If i was hunting vermin I'd use my PCP's but love the challenge and feel of the springers

@bratarnolda1014

5 ай бұрын

​@@awolwakefieldyorkshireshort barrel means nothing in sub 12.

@awolwakefieldyorkshire

5 ай бұрын

@@bratarnolda1014 Probably the same with a blue laminate stock which i mentioned. I won't mention any of these details in future as not to offend anyone

@paulwatson9217

Ай бұрын

@@awolwakefieldyorkshireactually the short barrel actually works in your favour. The barrel is only to get the projectile/pellet in this case on its way and start it spinning. An air rifle at sub 12 foot pounds is slow .22 five hundred and odd fps and .177 seven hundred and odd. So compare that to my 17 HMR doing 2550 fps the pellet spends much longer in the barrel and that means longer for the guns movement recoil and your hold to affect the shot. The only way to shorten that time in the barrel is to shorten the barrel, you can’t speed up the pellet because your gun would be over the UK legal limit. Believe me you can shoot the TX200HC at 50 meters or 55 yards with great accuracy with practice. The only benefit of longer barrels is with pcp it will increase air efficiency therefore increasing shot count and the longer barrel doesn’t affect accuracy as it’s a dead gun (no recoil) hopefully this helps I’ve been shooting half a century and yes I’ve got a sub 12 foot pounds TX200HC it’s an excellent air rifle but to be fair I’ve also got HW77k and the hw97kt to mention but a few of my collection.

Dear Mark, I will have to disregard your view on accuracy, because, sorry to say, your shooting technique is lacking. To begin with, the table looks quite unstable. Also, the support under the fore end has a cushioning over the wood that to me looks much too thin and therefore too hard. Springers do not like that. Also, putting the rifle on the curved top of that support makes it very unstable. At least, put a towel between the flat top part of the wooden support and the fore end, and / or use your leading hand wearing a shooting glove for extra cushioning, to get better results. The TX has at some point in time gotten a lengthened piston stroke which increases "lock time" and many find the shot cycle sluggish. That decreases accuracy and makes soft support and very precise follow through necessary. For the rest I agree with your views, especially your comparison with the HW 77 / 97, which handle, cock and load a lot easier. PS: Not very long ago, somebody gave a few good tips for shooting a spring - piston air rifle here: kzread.info/dash/bejne/aIV624-bm9Czhqg.html Happy New Year to you and keep up the, generally speaking, very thorough work.

@matthewleighton4994

6 ай бұрын

One of the fairest/most reasonable disagreement comments I’ve ever seen on KZread. Fair play to you for the respectful discussion.

@24745037

5 ай бұрын

I agree, the platform is not stable enough to shoot rifles off, especially 177 as its a harsher cycle.

@bear_chills

4 ай бұрын

I think he was trying to compare it as if it was a PCP... TBH, I thought the gun shot well considering it's a springer..agree with all the safety, like pain in the A. You won't beat a TX and an HW97KT for springers

@endurosl20081

4 ай бұрын

I think the gun fired surprisingly well, on a platform it is very hard making the springer bounce. The rifle was not resting on the balance point. The fact that the platform did not absorb recoil caused vertical dispersion on almost all targets.

@bear_chills

4 ай бұрын

@endurosl20081 Yes, you after let the springer naturally move

I have 5 Spring Rifles: HW95, HW97 and HW98. A Pro Sport and a TX200 HC. I like all of these guns and all are accurate. However, I have used the HW98 and TX200 in HFT competition for a couple of years before I finally decided to focus on my HW100. I've never liked the balance of the HW97 as it's front heavy and found the HW98 easier for me to shoot. Overall I found the TX200 better balanced of all the guns and much easier to service when needed. I also found that there are more after market parts for the TX which allow them to shoot nearly as smooth as a PCP!! I have recently short stroked my TX200 mark 3 with a mark 2 piston and spring which has made for less recoil and an easier gun to shoot.

@sustorres765

5 ай бұрын

So what do you think of your Pro Sport, only I’m thinking of getting one, thanks

@Happy-Me.

5 ай бұрын

@@sustorres765 It's a well engineered gun but I find the stock wider at the trigger so not as comfortable as the TX and a bit unwieldy to cock. I prefer the TX200 to be honest.

@sustorres765

5 ай бұрын

@@Happy-Me. thank you for the reply and the insight 👍

Enjoy your reviews and look forward to the new year's series happy new year and take care 😊❤

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Thank you! You too!

You can see the rifle bouncing off the rest. One time ur holding it the next u ain't. Not a fair test at all

Your comments are very interesting. I have toyed with buying a TX for quite a while but have not been convinced by all the praise surrounding them. (No shortage of second hand ones for sale). I recently bought an HW77 full length built 2005 in fabulous condition, cocks like a dream, 11.6 ft lbs and incredibly accurate. I have five Weirauch rifles, all springers and absolutely love shooting all of them. I just bought an Air Arms SE90 in immaculare condition but find it a completely different animal to the Weirauch rifles. To date i cannot find a nice non carbine at sensible money. The 77 was incredible value at £250-00.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @majorscope...sorry for the late reply. I have heard a lot about the TX and if it was my first gun, I would get to shoot it well, but it's not and in my opinion Weihrauch does it better. Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

An honest review, thank-you. Having run out of air during Covid lock-down, I decided to add a springer to my gun cabinet. I checked out both the HC and full length TX200. I bought the full length which has a longer cocking arm and is consequently easier to cock - I personally don't recommend the HC/carbine length. I found the lock time slow and it took me a while to get used to it (being more familiar with rimfire and PCPs). I eventually fitted a short stroke kit which improved it. (Rumour has it that it is currently designed as an 18 ft-pounder for the US market and we get the same gun with a softer spring.) Short-stroked its easier to shoot and groups now on a par with my AA S400 (i.e. very good - much better than the results in your video by a considerable margin). My only criticism now is the auto-safety which I hate. Not a criticism specific to the gun, I just hate auto-safeties. If I had been more patient and learned the gun's handling characteristics it would have been fine. The faster lock time from the short stroke kit makes it handle more like a PCP or rimfire. As modified, this gun is a keeper. Friends at the club who have tried it agree. As ever, your mileage may vary.

Well. Short barrel on a springer isn't a bad idea, actually it's a very good idea. There is a reason why Theoben made an 8" barrel airgun ;) As for TX vs HW97/77 both systems are very accurate, both have a great triggers. AA is way easier to service on your own, HW is cheaper.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

Faster lock time 👍

@charlesoutdoors2424

2 ай бұрын

I was going to say the same thing. People get the idea that a longer barrel is better and for PCP's this is true in most cases. Springers don't have much air volume so they only need a barrel that allows them to reach max velocity. The faster the pellet is out of the barrel the less effect the spring recoil will have. As far as accuracy I fail to see an advantage. The barrel being in the shroud works the same as a long barrel when it comes to making it easier to point and stay on target. Open sights will have an advantage with a longer barrel because the father the 2 sights are the better for aiming.

@paulwatson9217

Ай бұрын

It’s true Theoben Fenman had an 8” barrel and was very accurate.

First of all I would like to thank you for the video and wish you a happy new year. I can only judge air rifles that have 7.5 joules because I live in Germany. Personally, after many tries, I only have spring-loaded rifles because they simply offer me more of a challenge and fun when shooting. After over 35 years of experience in air rifle shooting, the Weihrauch brand compressed air rifles are the measure of all things and I will not give any of my nine pieces back! *laughs* I look forward to more of your honest videos in the new year - please keep it up! Kind regards Matthias

Fantastic honest review! I would love to see your HFT journey please post if you do.

At many HFT competitions across the country including the "Worlds" the TX200 and HW97 are the go to guns in the Spring rifle class.

In all reviews I have seen so far give the HW 97K and the TX200 as equivalent rifles as far as the accuracy is concerned. All reviews I see point out the fact that, in order to take it apart, one needs to remove the scope on the HW while on the TX it is not necessary and would lead to quicker, no hassle, maintenance. Both rifles have a ton of tuning possibilities out there. Both seem to be superb rifles.

You make some very good points regarding where the TX200 is made. I think the prices now are ridiculous and you could purchase a really good PCP for the price.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

I think the price seems fair considering the walnut stock is like a custom stock and the action is like a tuned action?

@Happy-Me.

6 ай бұрын

@@redpillnibbler4423 It's nearly a £1000 for a laminate stock model with the same action as a normal TX200!!

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Hi @Happy-Me. Sorry for the late reply. I wouldn't mind the pricing if the rifle was fully constructed in the UK, but it's not. Stock made in Italy, barrel in Germany. It's simply put together in the UK. Shame really as we could do with local craftsmen with apprentices reviving the industry here. All the best. Happy New Year.

@sergentcolon1

4 ай бұрын

@@theGunLockerlots of Weihrauch stocks are also made by Minnelli and lots of other manufacturers use Lothar Walther barrels, it’s fairly normal practise in manufacturing all round. I’ve owned a TX200 carbine and a Pro Sport in the past and currently own a HW97K .22 in a beach sportier stock and a HW95K .177 also in a beach sporter stock. All are superbly accurate, far more so than most shooters. Getting the best out of a springer requires a good technique.

The tx200 was my second choice on my shortlist behind the hw90k, I was unsure about the cocking mechanism and you have just confirmed that it looks to be a pain and as you pointed would become tiring quite quickly. It's about time AA came out with a break barrel rifle.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @Lander76, thanks for watching and posting your view point. I really struggled with the cocking of that rifle. The length of pull on the carbine is just to short so you don't get enough leverage to make it easy to cock. Kids and ladies will struggle. All the best and Happy New Year to you.

@andybrown8293

6 ай бұрын

Totally agree, AA should do another break barrel and yes loading the tx is a pain, it’s on the wrong side.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

@@andybrown8293 The breech cutout is on the wrong side for me - I’m left handed and cock my 77 with left hand and load with right hand,but the left hand tx has the cutout on the right 🤷‍♂️

@Mike_P646

5 ай бұрын

Cocking these rifles is easy, it's just about giving it enough power and going all the way back in one motion. More of a knack to it than anything else. Agreed,kids and ladies might struggle.

Nice review. If I may suggest to make a follow through with your trigger squeeze in order to tighten your groups. That is a micro slow squeeze all the way back while looking at your point of impact. I can see your finger jerking even before hitting the target. This method will work wonders as our TX200 is designed to average half inch or less at 25 meters and 1 inch or less at 50. Cheers from Canada. Former Olympic style match rifle competitor here.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Thank you. I intend on making some changes...but first I need to rectify my breathing. I felt my pulse as I was taking the shot and that put me off. I need to get fitter. Once that's under control, I will work on my trigger finger. All the best and Happy New Year to you.

@eagleace67

6 ай бұрын

@@theGunLocker Happy 2024 too my friend and more power to your reviews. Keep shooting!

There is sod all difference in accuracy between the tx and the 77/97 fact. You can't rest the front of the gun like that and you can't grip the rifle at all they don't like it!. The shot cycle on the tx is slightly slower than the 77 which is why a soft hold is required. As far as cooking is concerned the full length version is far easier.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

Slower lock time on the tx?

Hi Mark, another great review as always. Would now love to see a review on a Diana Mod 54 Air King Pro Laminate

Excellent air weapon. Mine loves anything 4.52, particularly the webley mozzies. Try it with the plenum adapter to quieten it down, makes a tangible difference.

Interesting evaluation of a 2nd hand rifle. You was concerned about the accuracy with the moderator fitted; did you fit the plastic plug that comes with the TX200 when you removed the moderator? This plastic plug forms part of the AA design to reduce noise, it has an elongated tube of about 50mm that sits in the end of the shroud close to the barrel end; My TX200 HC gives a consistent 80db at 1mtr from the muzzle. This could indeed affect the accuracy of the rifle as well, and may be a good reason to carry out further tests. I have another observation of your testing that causes concern; All of your accuracy tests show POI off to the right, indicating a poor zero with your chosen test pellet, also you cannot review a trigger mechanism if you are not prepared to adjust it to suit your preference, after all these are designed to be adjusted by the user and should not be marked down because of not wanting to adjust. I do enjoy your reviews in general and you have a good presence, but you will need to get some fundamental rules for conducting testing that embraces the design characteristics of each rifle. For the record, I have rifles from many manufacturers, including AA, Weihrauch, Brocock, BSA. Keep up the reviews and have a very good New Year.

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Hi @DigifilmShooter...sorry for the delayed reply! Regards the plastic plug - simple answer is no as I didn't have one. This is a used rifle and given to me as is. The zeroing of the scope...that was down to me and trying to get some footage before light failed. It was close enough to make adjustments in hold and get a general idea. Let's not forget that POI was between 4mm and 11mm from centre of red cross at 30m. That said, thanks for taking the time to comment and a Happy New Year to you to.

interesting for sure i have the tx and a 98 shot many 97’s and 95’s and a fair few other spring guns all shot very well . the tx i have is the full rifle but it is blisteringly accurate out to 55 yards if i do my job right (which is not all the time 🤣🤣🤣) shot a few hc versions and we’re all pretty good a lot used the qys pellets which seem to work very well . mine is not mega pellet fussy but at distance it likes the qys or the jsb 5.1 head size . however i have knocked the power down to 11 or there about’s but that’s my preferred power with a spring gun .

The HC has a barrel length nearly 80mm shorter than the Mk111, hence a little extra cocking effort. As a matter of interest anything over 10 inches is a waste of time. So said Tony BeIas on an episode of Hot Air a few years back. ( A series well worth watching ). Volume of air, length of stroke etc. etc. The pellet should have gone etc. etc. Who in the Airgun world would argue with him on technicalities ! I have short stroked both my Mk111 and my 97 KT with TBT kits. Lock time is reduced, both are better for it. Both are now running at 10.8 ft/lb. The problem I encountered was that neither rifle, if fed quality "brand" pellets , was very fussy. Took me months too convince myself which pellet suited which barrel. Without spending stupid money my TX is now, near perfection as far as I am concerned. The 97 is just very, very good. Nice video by the way.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @stephengamble9388...actually regards your comments concerning Tony Belas, I know one RFD who would say very different and has done so on many an occasion. He knows Mr Belas personally and has nothing good to say about him other than he's a salesman. I don't know the gentleman and have never met him, so I'll reserve judgement. But as I said in reply to another post along the same lines. If anything over 10 inches is a waste of time, why have the likes of FX developed so many barrel/liner options out to 800mm. It comes down to a balance of power loss against twist rate and stability of flight. Ensuring the pellet spins at the right rate through flight is a combination of many factors. Granted all this is more relevant to FAC / full power rifles. If you want to see a proper explanation of how it works, watch Matt Dubber's series instead. He has far more credibility in my opinion. Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

@gavinwilln7571

5 ай бұрын

PCP's and springers are very different beasts concerning barrels, lenght, twist, etc.@@theGunLocker

Very good review, that rifle is so accurate. You should fire 1 pellet of each kind of pellets after changing the pellet type outside of the target, then go for the grouping with the intended type. When changing from type to type of pellets, the rifling will accomodate with the new type of metal the pellet is made of with the 1st shot. I have noticed this with many rifles and dozens of pellet types and brands i have tested, you can even observe it in your groupings in this review.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

Excellent point,just wondering if it would take a fair few shots for the rifling to bed in to a different pellet hardness,not just one? Genuine question. It does take time to find the right pellet for a barrel,short term reviews are a guide only.

@aliabbas4756

6 ай бұрын

@@redpillnibbler4423 Thanks, and yes it is better for the barrel to shoot a few, say 3 or 4 pellets of some kind before testing its accuracy with a group. For instance, H&N use more antimony than JSB in the mixture, so they have harder pellets. Both are very good, but the rifle will handle each one slightly different than the other. There are off course other factors.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

@@aliabbas4756 Thanks,interesting.I’d have thought at least 20 or 30 would be needed before the barrel settled in but honestly I’m just guessing.

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Thanks @aliabbas4756. Time constraints and cost of pellets restrict me from doing a truly in-depth review. I work with what I'm given. All the best. Happy New Year.

@whiskeykilmer1866

5 ай бұрын

@@theGunLocker Cost of some pellets are ridiculous, but aren't you the owner of that multimillion pound estate you film from?

I’ve got a 97 & 77 and love them, the TX is a brilliant gun and after shooting and being very happy for years with the results using jsb 4.52. Ive been blown away 4.50 H&N FTT. To the point I’d say now it just beats my HWs (for now)

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

There's certainly not a lot between them but for me the HW77K is top

Ive got a 2nd hand TX200HC and I dont have a cocking problem. I slso use the artillery hold. Being 2nd hand you have to consider that the internals have been possibly tampered with which vould be affecting the cocking. Accutacy wise 20p groups at 35yds. But fair play you said it how you found it. Keep up the videos

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Hi @tjsnapper1953...thanks! All the best and apologies for the late reply. Happy New Year.

I just bought an Air Arms Pro Sport. In description they it noted It had a Lothar Walther barrel as a selling point. I believe it even said 8 strand. I got the walnut stock and it also stated that was made by Minelli which is another selling point. I have an HW97K and a Walther LGU along with the Pro Sport. Both the LGU and the Pro Sport have bushings and such so there's no metal to metal contact and they both allow the spring to rotate as it uncoils to help the shot cycle. I'm not saying my 97K isn't smooth or lacking because it doesn't have this, but that's something that some people pay a tuner to do. My 97k buzzed like usual until I installed a tin bum tuning kit. My LGU has a slight buzz. My Pro Sport which I just got today has no buzz or twang so I don't need to buy and install a kit to get rid of buzz. My 97k takes much less effort to cock than the Pro Sport and is much smoother than the hidden underlever. My guess is it will vary from gun to gun and what's been done as to which is more accurate when. I know my LGU is much easier to shoot tighter groups with than my 97K. We'll see where the Pro Sport fits in. My HW95N will most likely still be my favorite to shoot. I like them all though and may end up with a TX200 also.

Merry Christmas Mark, I own a Hw 77k and a Hw97k but don’t own a Tx 200hc, I think they use a short 9” barrel in the hc because it shortens the time the pellet is in the barrel in the shot cycle so is less affected by gun movement making it more accurate than it would have been. I am almost too ashamed to admit that I have taken the bear traps off both my Weihrauch’s just so I can put the safety on or off as many times as I want and also this lets me de-cock the rifle as well but I never ever let go of the cocking arm when loading. I just have to emphasise that fact to anyone picking up my gun.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

I had my 77 one removed too but wouldn’t recommend it.

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Hi Stephen, apologies for the late reply. Merry Christmas to you too! Be careful with that safety! Happy New Year.

Thanks for another great review, even if I disagree on a few points. I'm lucky enough to own a tx200 a hw77 and a LGU I honestly could and wouldn't want to pick between them. They're all great guns and I like them all for different reasons.

Bought a second hand TX hc a couple of months ago,first few times of use I could not get it to group even after using a wide range of quality pellets. I persevered,using a very light hold and a Caldwell rest,and my groups were very good at 30 yards,I also have a Prosport in the same .177 calibre,which I believe has the same internals,and I can hold it loosely or a vice like grip and it still shoots accurately! I guess it's finding out what each individual rifle likes and adapting to the gun. I do prefer the HW97k and the HW 77k to shoot,but prefer the Air Arms trigger,I found the Weihrauch rifles to be easier to cock,load and shoot,but that is just my opinion,AA are quality guns,no mistake.

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Hi @alanwilliams4569...apologies for the late reply and Happy New Year to you. It really does come down to personal preference and mine is for the HW77K. All the best and thanks for taking the time to comment.

I just bought a tx 200 hc . The cost of the gun was 1250 canadian plus 5% tax and 70 dollars shipping.

Hw77 for me, but I love the look of the tx

Thank you for your review. It's nice and in depth, which is how they should be. You are, however, basing your scores and forming your (slightly biased) opinions based on this singular TX200hc that you've borrowed for a short period of time. I do understand this, as you won't have the time or the means to test several different rifles extensively, which is the only way to reach a fair conclusive result. I would also never have tested it with the moderator on, as you can get massively different results, depending on what moderator you use, and this is not how they're intended to be shot, so when you removed it, you should have left it off for the testing, or done the full test both ways. Also, I know people have said to you in the past about your hold being wrong, which I don't completely agree with, if it's how you feel works for you, however, if you want to get the best out of a rifle, you need to experiment with the hold, as every rifle prefers to be held a different way. You might argue that Air Arms being so hold sensitive is a negative, but most people don't switch between riffles all the time like you do, and instead, invest the time and effort to learn their rifles, to get the best out of them. I think your video is proof of this, as your first group with the JSB Exacts is considerably better than your second attempt with them and on your second attempt, you were resting the rifle about 3 inches further forward on that hard rest. Finding the right pellet for the barrel is also very important and seen as though two of your chosen test pellets were 10.65gr, when springers generally prefer lighter pellets, you didn't really give it a fair chance. You would have been better off trying some different head sized JSB Exacts or some RWS Super Fields or something similar. Also, a shorter barrel doesn't mean less accuracy at all, that's just simply not true. With regards to cocking the rifle, you need to be a bit more forceful with it, it's well made, it won't break. If you find it too difficult, then the carbine version isn't for you and you would be better suited to the full length version. I personally find the HC version fine to Cock and at 70kg and 5ft 9in, I'm not exactly the biggest bloke in the world. You can also use the safety indicator to check if it's fully cocked. As for the trigger, once adjusted (which yours clearly needs) I find it to be on par with the record trigger. Just to be clear, I own both Air Arms and Weihrauch springers and love them all, but before tuning my Weihrauch rifles, they were nowhere near the standard that my TX200hc was straight out of the box. So from my experience, the Air Arms wins hands down from new, but once the Weihrauchs have had a couple of hundred spent on tuning, they are roughly equal. I would never say that one brand is better than the other, based on the small amount of data that I've gathered. What I will say with absolute certainty, is that Air Arms rifles come from the factory better tuned than the Weihrauch rifles do, which is where some of the extra money goes. These comments aren't meant as a dig at you, I just wanted to point out some things, as people may be making decisions based on your videos and some of the data you're giving and showing is just not true, whether it be by mistake or not. If you get the chance in the future, I would strongly suggest trying to get yourself a new TX200 to try out, as you never know what's been done to this one or how it's been maintained over the years. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised if you do. I hope you don't take these comments the wrong way, as I do enjoy watching your videos and thank you for taking the time to produce them. Hope you have a Happy New Year 👍

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @StyleAL. Thanks for taking the time to write such a comprehensive reply to my video. As for being truthful, I go on what I find and do not intend to mislead. I am limited to the short amount of time that I have with the rifle as I am with all the other rifles that I've reviewed, so there is balance there of sorts. Glad to hear that you enjoy watching the videos and thanks the well wishes. All the best and Happy New Year to you too!

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

Agree with you,short term reviews should be viewed as a guide only,viewer discernment is needed.

Early tx’s had rekord triggers( yes I saw one in the flesh) and the firepower-khamsin series action used hammerli barrels. I find the tx AB is nothing but a pain however working on a tx is a pleasure and much easier to strip.

I picked up a mint HW97KT in .177. My lad is left handed and left eye dominant. I sold my walnut TX200hc .177. The HW is twangy and average by comparison as standard. The TX would shoot ½" groups at 45 yrds with always less than 5 FPS spread just sub 12. I'd choose the AA every time in 2024. Paid £375 for the HW which is what I would value at new.

Great video, I shoot a TX rifle in .177 as standard it was great I've now had a Tony Leach 21mm conversion it will easily rival a pcp out to 45yds using jsb exact 4.51. I agree with the cocking not being as smooth as a HW77K as I shoot one of those aswell, which do I prefer? At the moment the HW77K just because the cocking is smoother, regarding the trigger I prefer the TX 👍

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @paulknowles9745, glad you liked the video! Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment. All the best and Happy New Year to you.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

DIY job?

@paulknowles9745

6 ай бұрын

@@redpillnibbler4423 I sent it to Tony Leach

Hi, I agree with you on the effort to cock the rifle and to cock fully. I can say however you do get used to it. I have had my TX200hc for a couple of months now and as a target 25m shooter can honestly say it is quite sensitive to hold and what rest you use. It is extremely accurate with AA or JSB 8.44 pellets but only using the artillery hold and on a softish front bag. Without using the artillery hold on a hard rest it is all over the place. I think as you say your shooting style suits the HW77 better.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

Would you say it’s more hold sensitive to any other spring rifle eg.hw 97?

Just an observation but you didn’t touch on how twangy the HW97 or 77 are out of the box compared with the tx, nor did you touch on the fact that with very limited tools you can strip the tx200 in the field or the fact that the tx200 doesn’t have to remove the scope when you strip it so you don’t lose zero, you can change the main spring or add and remove power washers in less than 10 minutes anywhere and be back shooting immediately or the fact that the tx200 is also running on Delrin But I get you prefer the HW’s to be fair to each their own I’ve got all and love all three of them wouldn’t bash any. Without the HW77 the HW97 and TX200 would never have been made the HW77 is a legend from 1983 and a real blast from the past, that is still relevant today.

Slightly off topic Mark, have you tried h&n excite econ 2 pellets? I have had good results with them and at £5.70 for a tin of 500 they are decent value.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @Lander76, as yet no but at that price definitely worth looking at!

I own two weihrauch k97 one standard and one thumb hole synthetic and the tx200 hc and the accuracy is superb this shooting was so unfair I also have the pro sport witch is a absolutely fantastic masterpiece

@theGunLocker

2 ай бұрын

I'm happy for you and your experience, but mine is obviously different and my comments or opinions are based on them. All the best

I have a HW 97, a TX200HC and a full length TX200 ultimate springer. The HW97 is a bit twangy, the TX200HC is hard to cock but the full length TX is just right🙂

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Each to their own! Ha! All the best and thanks for watching. Happy New Year.

Out of the box for me goes to the TX and only because of the set back trigger and slightly less twang. After professional tuning not much in it and both seriously good. With some stock mods (hamster etc) I prefer the HW90 gas ram, no tuning necessary.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

It really is a matter of personal opinion and what you get used to. Thanks for watching and Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

My tx preferred pellet is jsb heavy’s 10.34. the shot cycle seems more smoother to me with thease ,mines better with the mod on reduces muzzle flip,and the gun or any springer I’ve shot seems most accurate when not shot in quick concession,10 shots max then rest it I put it down to heat build up but when I’m on form the gun will match any pcp I’ve shot to 35 yards.keep with it and it will win you over but it can frustrate you for sure.

@redpillnibbler4423

6 ай бұрын

Interesting point.

Hi I own AA TX in both.177 and .22 plus HW 97 my favourite is the TX in .22 I had the same issue with the last bit of cocking stroke not engaging the safety catch easy cure was take out the front pin of cocking lever and a couple of strokes with a file on the elbow were the pin goes through as for you saying that the gun was very loud you did not have a plastic plenum in the end were you unscrewed the silencer this plastic plenum is supplied with the gun when new also the did not mention that the TX can be de cocked you can’t de cock the HW . I find that the TX seems more refined than the HW I have never found the cocking effort a problem just saying 😜. By the way love your reviews many thanks

hello Mark , i suggest that you shoot from a bag with a sand filling . a heavy one is the best . that keeps the gun steady and the recoil can get parallel , a airsbag under the sholder stock also needed. i do not think you can not shoot ,but every springer is different and some dont bother how the hold is but others shoot like shit . try a hatsan 135 carnivore .30 on a hard rest that will tell you yours peter ps i like also the hw 77/97 better then the airarms , the airarms is more luxe, but that shoots not better

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hello again Peter. You will see some changes over the coming months as I train for an HFT competition. Stance, hold, breathing and trigger technique will be fine tuned. With regards to my reviews and the shooting that you can see. That's not my best performance as I'm always rushing to perform for the camera and never truly concentrating on the shot. In truth, I'm probably shooting at 75% of what I can do. All the best.

It's used a lot hft to great effect 👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

barrel lenght . at some point you do not can get more speed in a barrel. . a shorttest barrel is more stabil and less swinging . thats good . and in breakbarrels its adding the barrellocking system . a long heavy barrel is not as good staying closed . long ago i must look at a hw 35 and tune it ,(no output restriction ) and discovered that a 3/5 the pellet was not contacting the barrel , so i shorten the barrel new crown not only the accuracy was top the output energy also , it wass tuned to 19 joule and then it was 21 in 22 cal

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @peteralexben...I agree to a certain extent especially regards power loss as it makes sense that the longer the pellet is in the barrel the more energy is used to expel it. But you also need enough length to stabilize the projectile in flight and that comes down to twist rate as well. There is a fine balance between the two. You only have to look at FX and the numerous barrel / liner combinations that they offer. Barrels up to 800mm in length...take a look at the Panthera. Sacrifice power for a more stable flight pattern. Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

What do you think of wasp pellets out of Hw97k cud you let me no plaes

you may have a bad tx200 ? ive got a tx 200, hw 77 and hw97 among other guns. had them all from new and i find the tx200 easer to cock, but i do understand having to fully cock the gun but it has never caused me a problem. when the triggers are set up correctly they are excellent . For me when they are both set up correctly there's not alot between them and i would rate my tx slightly higher. Im not a hw hater i own 6 of them

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

It comes down to personal preference...for me it's the HW77K. Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

Hi, my first comment on your videos which i enjoy watching, have not subscribed yet but will do after typing this, i have around 40 air rifles, honestly lost count 😅, I love the 77 and 97, and the TX and Prosport. These rifles are all capable of shooting identical groups, your grouping on this video is not impressive, what i can say is the pellets you used are mainly not great, even head size is vitality important for each and every barrel, with the right pellet and a more stable platform i guarantee you would get grouping as good as any PC, obviously one has to master every rifle, they all shoot different. Yeah the loading on HWs is much much easier and cocking the TX carbine is not as easy as the longer brother. Keep up with the videos, don't agree with everything you say but hey its all very subjective. Always entertaining and people must realise the gun you checkout is not the gun they own.

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Hi @24745037...apologies for the delayed reply. Thanks for subscribing. Spoiler Alert! Some of that's going to be covered in the upcoming series...stay tuned. All the best and Happy New Year to you.

Hey mark try the b40 Chinese clone for the tx200 b40 is best all round gun just saying

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

Apologies for the late reply...if I can get my hands on one, I will. All the best.

Had the 77s when they came out,got the mk1 tx when that came out and tbh thoughtvit was better than the 77,bought the mk2 tx and this was my favourite,don't like the later ones and can't justify the price.Just to put a cat amongst the pigeons,walther lgu is better than both 😉

Your ergonomics score is wrong in my opinion. AA make both left and right hand models of this rifle. If you are left handed you buy the left handed model, if you're right handed you buy the right hand model, simple. They make these dedicated rifles for a good reason, they are simply more tailored to you. I do enjoy your videos but I think your shooting rest could be vastly improved upon for shooting springers with looking at your shooting style.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Hi @brynybach7741...I look at ergonomics in a completely different way. The true definition is how adaptable an object is to the user after they have acquired it, and not the design process in creating it. Think FX and how adaptable their air rifles are. The arca rails, the fully adjustable butts, the interchangeable barrels / liners, interchangeable grips, ability to add weight, harmonizing, the ability to increase air capacity, etc. That's ergonomics. Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

How can you give this rifle such a low score 🤔

Hi Mark not a fair accuracy review on a patio table built a proper shooting bench. And use the gun rest you have in your summing up and not a piece of wood.

Over priced and like they say.."rip of Britain"... I'll have my 97 any day....

@theGunLocker

5 ай бұрын

I wouldn't mind the price so much if every part of the rifle was made in the UK but most of it is made abroad and simply put together in the UK. Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment...all the best

@Kurt_Steiner

5 ай бұрын

Very fair review and well presented 👍

Nah, nowhere near as good as my HW97. No comparison at all.

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

I have to agree, but I'm biased! Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

1 click L?👍

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

I went straight from the pellet test to the accuracy test without re-zeroing the scope. I was holding under and slightly to the left. Problem was I could feel my heart beat and that was affecting my shooting. Too much rich food over Christmas. That said you're right! Thanks for watching, and taking the time to post. Happy New Year to you - all the best for 2024.

@terryjobity43

6 ай бұрын

@@theGunLocker Many happy returns batch, anyway ,I also do cropping, just to see consis. of pel. then go for z, it really makes no sense to z. a non- perform. I'm having a hard break out with Ben.XL 1500, but getting their slowly . Happy sniping.

Shame that ratchet sounds terrible

@theGunLocker

6 ай бұрын

Yup it does! Thanks for watching and taking the time to comment. All the best and Happy New Year to you.