Again Boeing? It's a 30 year old airplane. This has nothing to do with Boeing.

Lotta people confusing airframe issues with what is obviously maintenance related.

@thefreedomguyuk

13 күн бұрын

All these malfunctions are intentional!

@TobinTwinsHockey

13 күн бұрын

Exactly

@mikecournoyer

13 күн бұрын

The title is more click bait. It should say “AGAIN MAINTENANCE”?

@wmmccoy01

13 күн бұрын

@@thefreedomguyuk 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I Agree! Stop the speculation! That's a maintenance issue NOT a Boeing issue!!

The aircraft is 34 years old. Beside this and a birdstrike back in 2016, no other incidents recorded.

@hefoxed

14 күн бұрын

Creator is probably trying to feed into the algorithm with the again Boeing title, KZread is a tough mistress However, a delta plane also had a slide deploy a couple weeks ago while in ground and hit a catering truck iirc. Also older plane. So probably should be again delta 😅

@MrCubflyer

14 күн бұрын

Well they did run one out of fuel and land on an abandoned runway in Canada, not the fault of the aircraft though that was pilot error and ground crew .

@richardjohnson455

13 күн бұрын

@@hefoxedI saw a video here about that slide deploying and hitting the truck but I can’t find it now. Do you know how to find it? Thanks.

@richardjohnson455

13 күн бұрын

@@MrCubflyerI believe that was later given the name “The Gimli Glider,” from landing the Air Canada 767 safely on the abandoned RCAF military airfield runway at Gimli, Manitoba. It was a metric vs. Imperial units conversion miscalculation during refueling. The pilots eventually were given an award for airmanship for both a very long glide and safe landing. The Captain had previously been a very experienced pilot flying real gliders. One article is here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimli_Glider

@richardjohnson455

13 күн бұрын

@@hefoxed I wrote you a long Reply about the other Delta 767 Exit Slide hitting the truck, but it was deleted inadvertently during an Edit. It was April 15, 2024 at Gatwick. Several news reports on it via standard Google search. My fault - 72 y/o with bad vision, fingers and probably cognition. Thanks for mentioning it here.

Again Boeing? What a dumb header as Delta has been flying 767's for 41 years and it has an amazing safety and reliability rating. STUPID headline

@charlesmoore1762

14 күн бұрын

Thank you! Seems piling on to Boeing is “all the rage “ now. Not meaning to slap Delta, but this was a maintenance issue!

@eddieflxible379

14 күн бұрын

agreed. These folks are outta control ripping on Boeing without knowing the facts of this particular flight.

@davidrichards1302

14 күн бұрын

RIght... and it's not surprising that parts are starting to fall off 41-year--old Delta aircraft. ;-)

@andrewforsythe7240

13 күн бұрын

Extremely stupid headline. I have flown the Delta 767 transatlantic 10 times, excellent aircraft and crew ! But clearly a maintenance issue here.

@typhoon2827

13 күн бұрын

😂 tell me you're a shareholder without telling me you're a shareholder

Delta maintenance not Boeing!

@classicalroach

14 күн бұрын

Thanks Boeing simp!

@BeerMetal58

14 күн бұрын

Relax, man. Boeing only kills whistleblowers, not internet commenters. At least, so far.

The 767 has an excellent record. This is a random, albeit bizarre, maintenance event. Boeing is an easy target, I know, but at least know your problematic aircraft, guys. The 757/767 line is proven and becoming missed as they age. This is pure clickbait.

This is a maintenance problem not Boeing.

@AEMoreira81

12 күн бұрын

Or an age problem. The plane is almost 34 years old and with only around 10,000 hours of life left (the Boeing 767 has a life limit of 60,000 flight cycles or 150,000 hours, whichever comes first).

This plane is over 20 years old. Clearly a maintenance issue.

@AEMoreira81

12 күн бұрын

Try nearly 34 years old. It has been with Delta since it was delivered new in 1990.

As many have said below, it is important to distinguish between engineering issues (737 Max) and airline maintenance issues. The mainstream media likes to 'pile-on'.

@douglasthompson2740

13 күн бұрын

Well they have good reason with the poor job of the regulatory agencies. Three strikes and you are out. Boeing was long given the benefit of the doubt for far too long and look where it landed the traveling public. I would argue that "piling" it on in the media has done more to put Boeing and its stockholders on notice than anything the FAA or NTSB have done. Boeing deserves all that it gets and more. Lives have been lost and the culture remains the same. Keep the light shining on Boeing until its management has been thoroughly changed.

It's fairly apparent the media has it out for Boeing for some reason. If there were any real journalist/reporters left you would have been told that this (as stated in so many comments) is NOT A BOEING issue as it is a maintenance/inspection issue.

So far no word as to where on the ground the slide landed...

Has nothing to do with Boeing and there planes. It 30 plus years old. It all up to the airlines maintenance center or a part failure. It happens.

The plane left Boeing 20+ years ago. Do better.

Professionalism on display for both pilots and controllers.

Edit: For those who didn't see it, the original title was "AGAIN, BOEING?" or such, then the rest of it as seen. Obviously they've changed the title. That's why you see so many of these similar comment here. Commentary otherwise left unchanged from my original an hour ago: Unfair to Boeing here. So many 767s flying with this system. It's had one other incident, a bird strike. C'mon do better. Not gonna watch, not gonna like, but had to comment. Worst case this is Delta, but even then I do not think they pack slides, they swap them out. Slide company may be the problem here. But not Boeing, not until there's a rampant issue with these.

Ignorant headline on this. "AGAIN BOEING?" Folks, this airplane is 34 years old and has been through so many maintenance checks since it was first built and has so many new parts on it its barely the same airplane it was when it left the assembly line. No one in their right mind can pass the blame for this incident off to Boeing. This is purely a Delta Maintenance issue.

@douglasthompson2740

13 күн бұрын

And where do you think those "new parts" came from? And who would install the more important systems? When you buy aircraft you buy their parts and their service manuals among many other things. When major overhauls come around a lot of work is contracted with the experts from the manufacturer. So much has been hidden, covered up, and glossed over by Boeing and its 'close' relationship with the FAA, Congress, etc. that we will never know what glitches caused what problems in the past and importantly in the future as long as the culture remains unchanged. The heading is quite appropriate and well deserved. In three or four years the FAA may deem to let us know what caused the problem or they may not so in the meantime I will go Airbus.

@88SC

13 күн бұрын

@@douglasthompson2740 it’s on the airline. Period.

@TMccrury

13 күн бұрын

@@douglasthompson2740 Delta has their own repair facilities and most of their own maintenance including heavy maintenance. This issue has zero to do with Boeing other than it’s a Boring jet. It has everything to do with Delta Tech Ops not doing something correctly.

The reporting of this incident has been downright poor. Most people associate an emergency exit slide with those mounted on the inside of an entry/exit door of an airliner. This Emergency Exit slide is one which deploys from the fuselage near the trailing edge (the rear end) of the wing to allow passengers using the "over-wing emergency exits" to safely get off the wing and onto the ground.

The FAA cannot let these mechanical issues slide.

@bbayerit

14 күн бұрын

Pun intended? I liked it whether or not you planned it!

@thefreedomguyuk

13 күн бұрын

They will !

@FloorItDuh

13 күн бұрын

​@@thefreedomguyukthey won't. It will be investigated and changes made where needed as has been for the past several decades. Stop your slander.

@RHINOTEJAS

13 күн бұрын

@@bbayerit Yes! 😀

@bbayerit

13 күн бұрын

@@RHINOTEJAS Fantastic! Still grinning over it!

I was questioning what part of NY or Long Island Sound did the emergency slide detach and drop off this flight? It's a big and bright integral component to go unnoticed. There was no mention as to where this may have happened

@richardjohnson455

13 күн бұрын

I just asked the channel owner of FR the same thing. The Delta lawyers must be on overtime.

Coming straight in has a totally different meaning to me

Someone got a free slide for the summer!

Well at least no one lost their phone to decompression this time... probably.

@wmmccoy01

13 күн бұрын

Stupid and uninformed statement.

@richardjohnson455

11 күн бұрын

@@wmmccoy01 It’s just vindictive useless sarcasm to diss Boeing with no constructive purpose or reference to evidence.

@richardjohnson455

11 күн бұрын

@@wmmccoy01 A much more immediate and serious issue is where the slide fell off and whether it caused ground casualties.

@wmmccoy01

11 күн бұрын

@@richardjohnson455 since there's been no reports of that ( and that would have been all over the news) I guess there was none.

time out! that title is a bit unfair. old ass plane and how about the maintenance team, failed to reinstall it properly. I expect that caption from news media.

@hefoxed

14 күн бұрын

It can also be part failure/fatique Not sure from Delta, but have heard that some airliners are reducing maintenance checks/testing. So could also be management.

Damn Boeing, You cant get anything right, Your brand new Boeing Airbus B767-3neo's are all falling apart.

Ouch.

it used to be enough not to fly, now you can't live near an airport for 💩 falling off planes. Disgusting

Fly Airbus, see the World, Fly Boeing, see the next one! Even if it was a maintenance problem, why do they happen more and more often? Good maintenance requires well-trained technicians, given enough time to do their job correctly. All costs money, but what pricetag has a human life? German maintenance guys get educated over a period of 3 years

@wmmccoy01

13 күн бұрын

I'm sure you don't know this but Boeing airframes are 44% of those in the sky, where Airbus, 22%. Does that help any?

KC-46 which is a Boeing 767 derivative was known to have these issues, sounds like it's an engineering problem

@davidmoser3535

14 күн бұрын

no

@sharonshoop495

14 күн бұрын

read it again it is an old plane.

Was the slide recovered?

@Raiders33

14 күн бұрын

It's gonna be a ride at Coney Island when it opens in May. 😉

If it’s Boeing, I’m not going!

@wmmccoy01

13 күн бұрын

Good, more room for me when I'm flying 757 to ATL. Dumba$$.

at about the 2:00 mark, is he reporting the # of passengers (pax) onboard vs the # of souls?

@wmmccoy01

13 күн бұрын

SOP

33 year old plane

@douglasthompson2740

13 күн бұрын

If it is a danger because of its age, then it shouldn't be flying! When they design it they give the number of flight cycles it is rated for. If it hasn't reached that number with proper maintenance, then it is a design problem and still resides with Boeing. Sorry, no get home free cards for Boeing. They have used them all up!

@claycassin8437

13 күн бұрын

@@douglasthompson2740 It is not a danger because of it's age. The 767 is an excellently designed and built aircraft. Boeing used to build them well. It is still within it's design age. I'm sure Delta keeps up with it and it's cycles. This was a friggin' SLIDE, man. It happens. I lost one once(on the ground). I also lost the tailcone from an MD-82 on climb out departing from PHL. That was not a Boeing...but it was a black eye on our maintenance department. Amazingly, neither event made even the local news, because nobody had an agenda to try and make money. This video is embarrassing clickbait.

Not everything that happens on a Boeing is a manufacturing defect. Many items can be traced to airline maintenance failure. I see a trend in your content that wants to blame Boeing for everything

Obviously facts don’t convince thickets. Boeing builds great airplanes. Customers maintain them.

Where over the sky did the emergency slide detach from this flight? No mention of it in the radio transmissions between flight crew and ATC…

@pyme495

13 күн бұрын

Over the sky? How high do you have to fly to get over the sky? 😉

@richardjohnson455

11 күн бұрын

Does anyone yet know when and where it fell? Any casualties?

@Flight_Records: it’s only been a short time since this incident, but you’ve already been asked >2 times about the fate of the missing slide. Would you please at least answer about where it fell and what happened to it, or at least if you know any more about it? I imagine Delta and its lawyers and investigators started scrambling to locate it starting the moment they learned of this. Thank you, Dr. J

@the_flight_records

13 күн бұрын

Apologies for missing some comments. I saw the incident on Avherald website and immediately checked for if the atc audio on LiveATC. I couldn't get to some parts initially, but I managed to obtain them after uploading the video. However, the video was already up. The pilot reports an issue with the emergency exit slide at 17,000 feet. I believe that's when the incident occurred.

@richardjohnson455

13 күн бұрын

⁠​⁠@@the_flight_recordsMany thanks, TFR! I found nothing more from any news or social media networks about the slide outcome as of a few minutes ago from several news videos found via Google. Did you get any idea of where the plane might have been at that 17,000 feet report? Dr. J.

@the_flight_records

13 күн бұрын

I guess over Westchester County Airport.

Hey, something fell out of the sky! Oh, a Boeing must have overflown. They have a super effective weight shaving program. Didn't know that maintenance designed the aircraft!! But it makes me all warm and fuzzy that the FAA is on the case! Maybe they will reattach the parts for Boeing? Seems Boeing is hiring people to root for them in the comments. So far we do not know what the cause is but we do know that Boeing has an overwhelming number of causes. I will just go with the odds and not fly with them. Most likely we will find it was a design flaw enhanced by poor quality replacement parts with poor maintenance guidelines and manuals that have "disappeared". Just one more "quality escape" in Killer Calhoun's view, nothing to worry about.

The female controller sounds like the same one from the BA 747 stabilized approach/speed video.

ATC wants to know the hours of fuel on board not the quantity. 72K lbs on one aircraft could be 5 hours; on another it could be 2 hours, not that it really matters. If it is only 30 minutes of fuel then yes it matters.

@dragon_ride_r7528

12 күн бұрын

Fire fighters need to know the quantity of fuel on board. ATC pass on this information.

Surprised that the controllers flight strip didn't show that the acft departed JFK meaning he had to ask

Interestingly enough we have the ability to pick a doctor, dentist, lawyer, auto mechanic, plumber, heck even a dog walker but can’t pick our pilots or type of aircraft when we go traveling thru the atmosphere at 70-80% of the speed of sound. We can’t even see the age of the plane or see the background of the pilots who are in the business end of the plane.

@richardjohnson455

13 күн бұрын

You CAN apparently pick your aircraft type on some, possibly many, reservations services. I’ve read several reports of people choosing their flight aircraft to avoid 737 MAX airframes.

@wmmccoy01

13 күн бұрын

@@richardjohnson455 I flew the 757Max all over Mexico. Smooth and comfortable flights.

@richardjohnson455

12 күн бұрын

@@wmmccoy01 I’ve never flown on a 737 MAX to my knowledge, but I reported my comment above after reading that some airline passengers have begun to select their reservations very carefully to avoid certain airframes they don’t trust, specifically various 737 MAX variants and perhaps other Boeing models. I believe it was reported starting some time after the original 2 737 MAX crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia attributed to MCAS. Did you mean 737 or 757 in your comment about flying in Mexico? Were you a pilot or passenger? Thanks.

@wmmccoy01

12 күн бұрын

@@richardjohnson455 yea, fear porn will do that to ignorant people. BTW, I don't mean ignorant as a insult, most are just ignorant of flying and what it entails.

@wmmccoy01

12 күн бұрын

You most certainly get detailed information on the aircraft you're flying, down to its ICANN code.

If it's a Boeing, parts will be going...

@BlueSkyUp_EU

14 күн бұрын

Listening to European ATC, I lately run into quite a few Airbuses diverting due to smoke & fumes in the cockpit or cabin. Should I go to Airbus incident videos and say "If it's Airbus, it will fry us"? 😅

@wmmccoy01

14 күн бұрын

You probably don't realize that 43% of the planes in the sky in the US are Boeing whereas 21% are Airbus. Overall, Boeing has a good record except with the fear porn crowd.🙄

@beyondEV

14 күн бұрын

@@BlueSkyUp_EU 1 Airbus but well over 15 Boeing / Donald Mc Douglas Planes have been lost due to in flight fire. Bad example.

@TeemarkConvair

14 күн бұрын

thats not necessary

@silmarian

14 күн бұрын

@@beyondEVAnd when was the last one for any of those?

Is it a Boeing issue or is it a maintenance issue with airlines. How are planes regularly inspected

This has nothing to do with Boeing. I use to respect this channel but your decision to title this video that, has seriously decreased that respect

@claycassin8437

13 күн бұрын

I'm glad I don't subscribe.

should be ok...things falling off aircraft is normal...

😮Did the slide land on a random professor's lawn too? Avoiding flying Boeing like the plague

@thefreedomguyuk

13 күн бұрын

They want to stop all flights !

@wmmccoy01

13 күн бұрын

Good, more room for me.

boeing doing their ford impression.deliver the junk & get your money FIRST. then do all the repairs thru recalls.

@nickv4073

14 күн бұрын

This plane is 34 years old, dummy.

The title is unfair. This aircraft first flew in November 1990. We should be asking why is a major flag carrier still operating a 33+ year old aircraft? Boeing certainly bears responsibility for many issues but this is not one of them.

@idunnoanymore2870

13 күн бұрын

Lack of new a/c coming online so using old a/c in the interim?!

Way to go Brandon… oops! I meant Boeing!🤦🏼🤦🏽🤦🏿

Who still flies 767???

@SpottinPlanesForLife

14 күн бұрын

Best plane ever

@wmmccoy01

14 күн бұрын

Really!? One of the most successful airframes to come from Boeing.

@alphamaccao5224

14 күн бұрын

Man you gotta love with the ignorant and stupid decide to announce to the world exactly how dumb they are.

@claycassin8437

14 күн бұрын

Delta and United, with 66 and 53 in their fleets respectively. That is because it is a fantastic airplane, even if it is near retirement. Enjoy them while you still can!

Nothing out of the ordinary there for Boeing.

So sick of these old airplanes being Boeing's fault. Is it Toyota's problem if a door falls off of your 3 year old car. Get over it. And don't call me stupid!!!!!

@bobw53jrma

14 күн бұрын

3 years old? Probably their fault.. 30 years old.. no, not their fault.

@kentuckybowl-o-sticks

14 күн бұрын

Shirley you're joking...

@sharonshoop495

14 күн бұрын

@@kentuckybowl-o-sticks No I am not joking. Same old thing the American way now, Blame it on someone else!!!!

@kentuckybowl-o-sticks

14 күн бұрын

@@sharonshoop495 That was an "Airplane" joke... SHARON. Remember: " ...AND STOP CALLING ME 'SHIRLEY'!" SEE? I called you "SHIRLEY", not "STUPID"... oh, NEVER MIND 😂

@douglasthompson2740

13 күн бұрын

Yeah, it is Toyota's problem if the steering fails, the engine explodes, or the doors fall off. Where have you been living? If a door falls off a three year old car the manufacturer is going to have a very major problem. It is called product liability. A product must perform as it was intended and that would include getting from one airport to another with all the parts on board. Planes are sold with a lifetime measured in landing takeoff cycles. They had better be able to accomplish them with appropriate maintenance or the company is liable.

When you’re in the most abundant aircraft flying, you can’t blame Boeing. Try labeling the airline instead.

Too bad you think you have to title the video implying another Boeing issue. You deserve thumbs down .

@claycassin8437

13 күн бұрын

He got one from me.

Awesome job on this video! Another month, another Boeing part falls off

@davesilver5493

13 күн бұрын

Nothing to do with Boeing.

@claycassin8437

13 күн бұрын

This video is terrible. Pure clickbait.

@richardjohnson455

13 күн бұрын

@@claycassin8437No, the video is very interesting and worth watching. The title is not the best.

If its Boeing the door is going.

Amazing the preflight walk-around didn't catch the loose panel

All the simping for Boeing in the comments is....funny. Cheer on girls, cheer on.

@JAMESWUERTELE

14 күн бұрын

You wouldn’t know the difference if they took out the cards on the seat back.

@alphamaccao5224

14 күн бұрын

what you call simping is pointing out reality. Pathetic and stupid when people like you think that ONLY negativity should be pointed at a company. Not even sure why we allow animals with your mindset to continue living tbh.

@Tom-zi9xw

14 күн бұрын

@@JAMESWUERTELE Sick burn. Sick. 🤣

@Raiders33

14 күн бұрын

@@JAMESWUERTELE Could literally use a Lockheed Constellation Safety Card from a Connie.

@michaelhorne8366

14 күн бұрын

Imagine being the sort of bell end who parrots hot takes on a topic they have no idea about. Boeing did not perform the three yearly remove, inspect and replace of this slide. Delta did. Boeing did not mess up that process, leading to this incident. Delta did. You need to go back.

Because...accountants.

@POVwithRC

14 күн бұрын

I'm not convinced of that. Look deeper.

@6StringPassion.

14 күн бұрын

@@POVwithRC Fair enough.

@williamedwards1528

14 күн бұрын

@@POVwithRC The bean counters have been in charge there for the last several years.

@DeweyCheatumNHoweLLC

14 күн бұрын

@@williamedwards1528 Delta's accountants, maybe.

@thefreedomguyuk

13 күн бұрын

Because.....Stop climate change, and instate our NWO ! 😮

everyone talking about how boeing is not to blame; DEI hiring is to blame. the fact that boeing embraces DEI hiring practices indicates that boeing only cares about 1 thing. money. and we all know that money's value follows a simple formula known as TVM, and boeing are the only ones who seem to really care about the current value over future value, except for the city of chicago. Let us not forget that Boeing writes the manuals and recommends the training of the maintenance crews. these things are expensive to do perfectly. so their money grubbing racist brains half ass the recommendations instead of just not doing it, because if an airplane company decided to not send over a manual for the planes, it would be bad for the stock.

Delta is getting as worse as United Airline.

I wouldn't trust Boeing to give my lawnmower a service.

Of corse boeing

@nickv4073

14 күн бұрын

Relax. The plane is 34 years old. Its a Delta maintanance issue.

This is the result of accountants not engineers running Boeing……sad

@silmarian

14 күн бұрын

This is a Delta maintenance issue, not a Boeing one. The plane was built over 30 years ago.

@nickv4073

14 күн бұрын

Hey, Dummy. This plane is 34 years old.

@claycassin8437

13 күн бұрын

A slide failure on an otherwise excellent 33 year old 767 is an accountant's mistake? Huh? Do you know anything about aircraft maintenance and WHO is responsible for it?

@daviddenham1511

11 күн бұрын

@@claycassin8437 no, I know nothing, only 17 years as a navigation officer, safety officer, ops controller and instructor……go away you ignorant prat

In that case it was not the fault of Boeing. Either it was an installation or maintenance error or simply a failure of the material.

This is a maintenance issue with Delta. It has nothing to do with Boeing. Too bad you dont report ALL the issues with Airbus. You would have a video every single day, maybe more often than that. Talk to the real experts. We pilots know the difference between quality and crap.

@wmmccoy01

14 күн бұрын

Yup.

@wmmccoy01

14 күн бұрын

...and Boeing has twice the number of airframes flying in the US over Airbus.

@markhancock6694

14 күн бұрын

@@wmmccoy01 Yes, and Airbus planes are in the shop for unscheduled maintenance 6 times more than Boeing. Pilots have nicknamed them "Airbust" which says it all.

@Raiders33

14 күн бұрын

Delta's maintenance contractor's contractor. 😛

I don’t think Boeing is at fault for a door falling off of a 34 year old 767. Do better.

@Perich29

14 күн бұрын

767 uses powered operated door just like on the DC-10, and Lockheed Tristar.

why do people still fly boeing??? its not safe!

@Raiders33

14 күн бұрын

I wonder how many fatalities there have been in Mercedes automobiles...

@nickv4073

14 күн бұрын

This plane is 34 years old, dummy..

@Perich29

14 күн бұрын

I'm never flying on Boeing.

@bbat2159

13 күн бұрын

Please don’t comment on some thing you’re not educated on. It is a maintenance issue with Delta. Not a Boeing product issue. Big difference.

@claycassin8437

13 күн бұрын

The 767 is perfectly safe. So is the 757. Boeing's problems are type and age specific, as in their newer ones suck. These older planes were built when Boeing still knew how to build them. I will get on one any day. I will NOT get on a 737 Max, 777, or 787.