Caminho gardado pelo so ajnjos do senhor jesus birgado

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

GREAT FLIGHT BOBBY WOW SHE FLEW LOOKED AND SOUNDS AMAZING. THANKS FOR FILMING JEFF. SUCH A COOL JET. 🇬🇧🇺🇲🕊️✌🏼🤩🤙🏼👍🏼

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

I really like this Jet too!

I really like the 6 AF 105 mm EDF's that I purchased from Banana Hobby. I fly off a 440 for asphalt runway and the planes use about 275 feet. Landing a little less as I use the brakes' Please keep posting your videos and great job of narrating. I prefer the 105's over any other size EDF's for visibility and stability.

Wow it really looked like it was struggling to take off. A beautiful plane but it kinda cured my need for anything larger than my 8S 90mm freewing planes. I have to admit I did not expect that it was going 122 mph, guess because it was so big. It definitely sounded cool! Good job, I really like that you guys show the bad and the good. I suspect that a lot of reviewers use a heavy hand when it comes to editing! Thanks for taking the time to post this stuff! Keep up the good work!

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the nice comments! We try really hard to show EVERYTHING and keep it 100% honest over here! The L-39 actually rotates better now..found out it needs half flaps for take-off, not the 1/4 flaps or no flaps I did in the video!! Always learning!

Nice flying BOBBY!! Gotta get mine maidened ASAP, and with the JP , so we’ll see right. Good job guys👊🏼👊🏼

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

That JP fan is not compatible with the stock ESC

@JeffsCustomRC

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer Hmmm…I’ve got plenty of thrust, so I’ll have to see, also upgraded all connections to the larger for fan and esc, hope for the best 🤞🏼👊🏼

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

@@JeffsCustomRC According to JP and Fanjets you need N esc that cN handel a high pole motor...the castle 160hv I upgraded to wasn't..and the stock esc isn't adequate for how powerful that stock fan is!

Banana hobby shirt and all!! Big beautiful jet. Like you said, a more powerful Edf would be great in that bird. Still flies awesome. Great flying! L-39 is my go to flyer.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Thanks Che! And happy belated Thanksgiving!!! A Lil fanjet 110 is in the way 😉

Awesome, I’ve enjoyed mine these past few years. Always get the 😯 😮 factor with people

@RCPlaneReviewer

10 ай бұрын

Exactly!

This plane "NEEDS" flaps for takeoff, especially on grass.... its heavy.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Flaps are definatly needed and all the others I used with flaps and it did definitely help it rotate. I agree I think the stock Fan produced more thrust than the JP, I will do 125% elevator like you did to help get her off the ground

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

How much delection were you using in your video full flaps or half?

That is Nice!!!

Not sure why the take off look so sketch, the power may need an upgrade? This aerofoam looks gorgeous.

I shoehorned my jetfan 110mm 840kv in mine. Much faster rollout but I had to open up the fuse to push it back more due to the weight.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

I just finished putting the JP 105 in it and changed the timing from 5 degrees to 12..should be a noticeable improvement

@victorrcjets7660

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer They are pretty particular on the timing.

nice flites Bobby!!! to bad on that 2nd attempt LOL

To be honest with you bro that thing looks underpowered for the grass. Once it's in the air, it does get on step but definitely needs more power. I would look at either Jeffan 105 or 110 and Wemotec 100mm with the 1080kv motor. The JP fans sound good but are extremely inefficient when compared to Jetfan or Wemotec. Cheers 🍻

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

It's actually not under powered really, its a 16lbs bird, ..heavy took off with no flaps. With flaps it jumps off at 300ft. I got another video coming of it with the JP fan and esc timing changed for more rpm make them performas such. I have a Jetfan 110 for it already, just waiting to be installed. There's more going on with this plane when edf. It needs more air to hit the max thrust as it was first made for Turbines. So opening the intakes are a must. It's pushing 16.4 lbs of thrust. The jetfan 110 het 840kv is the sweet spot 21lbs of thrust.

@jared6072

9 ай бұрын

I just got the answer to my million dollar question😅. I was back and forth getting the l39 or the mb339. Along with if i should get the pro v2 version with the jp fan or get the arf and put in a jetfan. Looks like its mb339 arf and jetfan with 840kv motor. I was looking at cost and its only 80 bucks more then the pro v2.

Time to get rid of the Lipos and use LiIons. Don't you want 12 min flight times :)

@RCPlaneReviewer

22 күн бұрын

Sure let me know! Send it

That jets seems like it needs alot of runway , even on the first flight , glad you got it sorted though

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

What it needs is a better larger edf

Dang that sounded like a turbine when it was taxiing, smooth landing. How does it compare to the Aeromachi?

@snoriverrc3842

Жыл бұрын

the stock motor definitely sounded different from the JP.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

It's definitely more responsive than the MB-339, Speed seems faster too..it's a very good flyer! 👍 both a great honestly the L-39 to me is easy to land too!! I'm upgrading the EDF for grass Ops. On a paved runway it's Performance is great..on grass could use 1-2 more lbs of thrust to rotate ealier

Did you put the stock fan back in it or are you using the JP edf's?

@RCPlaneReviewer

Ай бұрын

No sir, that jp was good and balanced

Well, the stock fan seemed to push much better. Grass runways always present a challenge. I have the AeroFoam MB-339, just a dream to fly. I am leaning towards these larger jets as they are easier to fly and easier to see. I also have the HSD T-33, its a monster, the 120mm EDF just has enough thrust to get this jet on step. I just received the HSD HME-262, Twin 90mm, this one should really move out, hopefully. I love the L-39, and i have been watching the videos on the AeroFoam model. Seems to do just great on its stock fan, luckily our club has a 600-foot petromat runway, makes it great for takeoffs and landings. Did you feel the JP Fan was more powerful? Does it draw more than the stock fan? And how did it compare in weight? Thanks for the video.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching!!! The JP fan definitely has to have the timing changed.. mine is set at 13 degrees and it now rotates at half or field with half flaps for take off..it's got plenty of power to get it up and moving. I still plan on swapping out the JP for a fanjet110 hotter set up. The MB-339 105MM with the JP fan is amazing

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

I'm thinking of buying the HSD T33 or Me262 how is it off grass?

@lmramos44

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer I have never flown the T-33 off grass. It’s heavy, I have run it off our runway onto a roughly mown lawn and the retract pushed through the wing…I would not feel comfortable flying it off a grass runway. The MB-339 May do a bit better off grass….but you definitely have more experience flying off grass then I do. I am amazed you don’t destroy more retracts flying off grass….

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

@@lmramos44 Our field is well manicured and extremely short very forgiving on the jets. The MB-339 rotates with ease

I am new to this hobby and don't own a plane yet. What do you suggest for a beginner? I live in Maine so I have time to learn before buying lol.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

A really good trainer plane like a cub is very good the Tasma is good here too www.bananahobby.com/5-ch-xfly-model-tasman-1500mm-rc-trainer-airplane-pnp.html

Bobby has this got the 875kv motor like the new Pro V2 in thr MB339? What motor will you be upgrading it to for more grass ops power? Cheers.

@RCPlaneReviewer

10 ай бұрын

The upgrade Im doing will be the 12s 700-98-840kv

Your video is informative. When it comes to grass take off it seems the 105mm L-39 is under powered. Our club has a paved runway of no more then 160 feet. Will it be suffient for a takeoff? Beautifull plane but not sure if it is worth the $1000 investment.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Well now that I have put a few flights on it and will have a follow-up up video soon..I learned this large Heavy bird really needs 1/2 flaps for take off.. with that it rotates at half my airfield with no problemsa d with the JP Fan its Great!. It's truly needs. More powerful edf tho the stock one will get the job done ✔️

Did u find the jp fan was better or changsun?

@RCPlaneReviewer

10 ай бұрын

It is much much better!!! Balanced too

How big is it compared to the freewing one?

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

It's 2 times the size of the Freewing

Is this the V2 and how does it compare to the V2 MB339 you just flew?

@RCPlaneReviewer

10 ай бұрын

This is the v1 version and I LOVE the v2 MB-339 better. Better flyer and lands very well 👌 I perf the mb339 all day

@The43rdHammer

10 ай бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer thanks, that’s useful … I really like the L-39 but if you say the new MB339 is better I believe you. BH are showing a V2 L-39 on their website, is this one an improvement to the one you had do you think? There’s a story behind my interactions with BH and Ralph S which is long and frustrating and not for here, hence my comment on your V2 MB339 video. I wish they’d have given you the plane to test before they put it into production! Thanks again 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

I know you won't respond to my comment but you ever coming threw west Virginia let me know i have about 10 different planes you can come fly anytime

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Hey!! Really appreciate it I bet it's a nice view up that way too! Whatcha got in the hanger!!

@jimbo8390

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer man good question. I have 3 f-16s 80mm the a-10 and umx a-10. I have the f-14 tomcat. Beechcraft d18 is my favorite flying one. I have the umx voodoo. Just got the freewing l-39. I also have about 10 cars/trucks lol

@jimbo8390

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer what you have in the hanger

Nice review, the plane needs pavement, the grass is like constant brake. It still had just enough to get off of it though. It flew great.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

The grass does create drag but it's actually the stock EDF needs more air...it appears to be Ir starved. This bird was originally made for Turbines not EDF's T first so you need to make air inlets on it to hit peak performance

@greg0063

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer a foamy for turbines?! Interesting 🤔

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

@@greg0063 they do it all the time!

@greg0063

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer a little asbestos and your good!

information. the question is, did the manufacturer spec the edf system CORRECTLY.! fo an edf, the most efficient cross-sectional area of the exhaust IS Equal to the effective swept area, of the impeller. this value is also the minimum efficient intake area. the use of a cheater(s) does Not fully compensate for too-little intake area. the somewhat inconsistent (and whiny) sound coming from the edf suggests that one or both of these values is OFF. googletranslate

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

The EDF is balanced, I think it can, would benefit from having more air inlets and sounds kind of starved. Remember this model was originally designed for a turbine and then a edf as an after thought. Edfs need lots of air flow...lots! So I think opening up and getting more air in will substantially help with thrust and over all performance

Definitely down on power for grass, sorry to see her like that :(

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

A quick change of edf will fix this!! Flys great

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

It's 100% on a paved surface

Those damn planes are so heavy huh? Try a composite unit next. ;)

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

Yeaaah are they that much lighter?

Terribly long take off runs!!!

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

You would too off thick grass lol 😆

Sucker takes forever to get off the ground.

@RCPlaneReviewer

Жыл бұрын

That was because I didn't use enough take flaps like a moron lol

@RCJWILL954

Жыл бұрын

@@RCPlaneReviewer we've all done that before!