Great way to make people even less sympathetic towards the cause.

@patrickstar686

5 ай бұрын

Great way to get on the news actually. If a scientist would have said that something needs to change or they'd held a normal protest you wouldn't know about it now ;) Also there's glass in front of the painting so why are you mad?

@balsarmy

5 ай бұрын

Maybe they are not even activists. They could get paid to create negative image of ecologists and certain political parties.

@martincatoniryan1638

5 ай бұрын

Maybe because he was there at that time seeing the mona lisa, being marvelled by it and had his experience shattered by two crazy women.

@Flickvids100

5 ай бұрын

Well, your position is as irrational as theirs. What does the cause itself have to do with the way it is manifested? So if I go around naked asking to stop hunting whales...you would be more sympathetic to whale hunters because you don't like me walking naked? Does not make sense. Separate both.

@Flickvids100

5 ай бұрын

@@patrickstar686 Well, I was talking to the person from the first comment, but your position supports mine, so good that he/she reads both.

Good thing it's behind the glass. However, there are countless other paintings, statues and artwork that aren't protected. They really need to restrict what people can bring in to the museum.

@ThomasVWorm

5 ай бұрын

This was why it was chosen. And this is why they did use soup. Those people don't want to cause destruction but attention.

@dennischiu272

5 ай бұрын

Wholly disagree. The soup is not the culprit here.

@richards.7770

4 ай бұрын

The museum security is pathetic.

@ThomasVWorm

4 ай бұрын

@@richards.7770 yes. I also think, that they should let nobody enter the museum.

@Mahbu

4 ай бұрын

@@ThomasVWorm I am also of the opinion that's probably why they chose the Mona Lisa. It's symbolic so they don't ACTUALLY need to damage the painting. Attacking it without actually attacking it.

In the united states, these vandals would have been face down in handcuffs within 3 seconds.

@nzs316

5 ай бұрын

Plus the cops would have emptied out their clips stating they were in fear for their lives by the cans of soup!

@Harshel_Rawat

5 ай бұрын

That's why they didn't do this in US

@960john

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, insane right? That's what you mean?

@nzs316

4 ай бұрын

@@960john Crazy is right

@justayoutuber1906

4 ай бұрын

Or if they were doing it at the Capital, they would be called "hostages"....

VANDALS deface Mona Lisa Calling them 'activists' or 'protesters' legitimizes their criminal behaviour

@lisilein2

5 ай бұрын

Calm down. All they did was throw soup at a bit of glass.

@nazortube

5 ай бұрын

@@lisilein2 They should throw this soup at you maybe

@soundscape26

5 ай бұрын

Maybe she was hungry

@Hawijack

5 ай бұрын

@@lisilein2lock them up as an example that this should not happen. 2:53

@independentthought3390

4 ай бұрын

@@Hawijack Will probably walk free with a warning. Justice system in France is on a whole different level of leniency than anywhere else in the world.

These protesters need to go to the source of their rage...not defacing innocent works of art. The world's Museum's need better security...and search people before entering.

@lynntucker4196

5 ай бұрын

Excuse me Ma'am.. is that SOUP in your pocket??

@fennyellis3366

5 ай бұрын

@@lynntucker4196 Apparently so!🤣

@CadyCadwell

4 ай бұрын

how dare you bring soup to museum

@kevtb874

4 ай бұрын

The source of their rage is people not caring or listening or acting.

@fennyellis3366

4 ай бұрын

@@kevtb874 They were protesting against the agriculture system. They need to find out where the head of the agriculture department lives, and protest in front if their house or company. Defacing art has nothing to do with their protest.

Unemployed behavior

@soundscape26

5 ай бұрын

Unemployed shaming?

@justanothermortal1373

5 ай бұрын

First-world people

@ekaterinakomissarova7692

4 ай бұрын

​@@soundscape26yes

@lawrencecarter1954

4 ай бұрын

You should be ashamed

@Italiana911

4 ай бұрын

Also unemployables.

How do you put up a headline reading the painting was defaced while also saying the painting is behind thick bulletproof glass?

@onlyme219

5 ай бұрын

It's a reason to click on the video, catch up

@yoyyo-fs7te

5 ай бұрын

cuz cousin

@Flickvids100

5 ай бұрын

Yep. Absolute and predictible clickbait

@steved372

5 ай бұрын

Yup.Content creators are renowned for saying absolutely anything to generate revenue

@321findus

5 ай бұрын

Deface "spoil the surface or appearance of (something), for example by drawing or writing on it." Source: Oxford Languages

20 years in prison and there will be no more people willing to be bothered by this PR

Whats the Mona Lisa got to do with Farming reforms?

@ekaterinakomissarova7692

4 ай бұрын

😂

@Italiana911

4 ай бұрын

Nothing!

@missnatasha851

4 ай бұрын

It was about capturing the attention so that they were listened to. It was for a good cause

So happy to see that it was protected.

@peteriddqd

5 ай бұрын

its probably not even original

@Lolleka

5 ай бұрын

​@@peteriddqdIt is not

@soundscape26

5 ай бұрын

All famous paintings are protected, it would be crazy not to do so.

@Billy67

4 ай бұрын

To be fair she was smirking at them.

@DixonDixon65

4 ай бұрын

If youve been there you knew it was...fortunately!❤😅

Evidently it's okay to bring cans of soup into the Louve and other art national galleries, because you never know when some needs to eat soup while looking at paintings. Where was the security at the checkpoint entry?

Instead of putting up screens, why aren’t they hauling them away?

@fv6125

5 ай бұрын

Because they know that they meant no harm. If you only know the details of what they were fighting for then you would have a little sympathy for them. Do you think they didn't know that the painting wasn't protected? This is just effective way to gain media attention which they got.

@CanisLupusSteparium

5 ай бұрын

@@fv6125This kind of action automatically makes most people oppose whatever “cause” inspired it in the first place. The only achievement here is that a handful of extremists preached to the choir while alienating the people who needed to be persuaded. The counterproductive nature of sanctimony, banality and narcissism.

imagine paying for flights, hotel, museums tickets to see these two show off their hate for the world

@dowak3991

5 ай бұрын

imagine paying for flights, hotel, museums tickets to see... a painting 💀

@pointblank0020

5 ай бұрын

@@dowak3991boom, took the words out of my mouth. I think this is great way to call attention to real issues. A painting doesn't actually have any value other than the value we ascribe to it. Meanwhile there are real problems out there

@sukhrobmirzodavlatov2385

5 ай бұрын

@@dowak3991 Imagine having aestetic taste to appriciate art

@nazortube

5 ай бұрын

@@dowak3991 much better than screaming free palestine with islamists in the streets

@Lolleka

5 ай бұрын

​@@dowak3991Imagine paying all that to see ... a replica of a painting. No way it is the real deal.

Young people with early dementia

@chrissy138

5 ай бұрын

🔥🤣

@presamicke

4 ай бұрын

Yeah wonder who is creating them. And yes a lack of nutritions

After seeing this well thought out and sensible action, I have decided, to sell my car, get rid of my central heating and forage the local woods for berries to eat to do my part! 🤔

@CharlesMuccia

5 ай бұрын

🤣🤣

@gloryshabouk7884

4 ай бұрын

😂

Where are the security guards to obtain these two vandalisers. The other year, when cake was thrown at it, the security pounced on them in seconds. Why didn’t they in this situation? These two people should’ve been sent to a mental Institute, like the other guy was who throw cake on it

@alidi4144

5 ай бұрын

Probably sued

@homebasedgaming

4 ай бұрын

Probably staged

@shadow-iz1qr

4 ай бұрын

Probably don't get paid enough to care

Activists got room temp IQ

@patrickstar686

5 ай бұрын

They got you to watch a 3minute video about their cause and didn't even have to damage anything 🤡

@-dizzee

5 ай бұрын

@@patrickstar686 I made it bout halfway thru an my IQ dropped to room temp too smh

@DustyB

5 ай бұрын

@@patrickstar686literally nobody’s watching this video is like, “yeah, I agree with this message”

@tiguilherman_plays

5 ай бұрын

@@patrickstar686 so we can hate it? yeah, genius move.

@FireOccator

5 ай бұрын

@@patrickstar686 WTF even is their "cause"?

People that want attention will do anything to get attention. This is just nasty and these "activist" need to be held accountable.

Doing things like this is not a good look for their cause, its like they have no concern for public opinion and they're doing this for their own personal glory

@martincatoniryan1638

5 ай бұрын

Yep. Their ego must be huuge. They want their faces and stories in the news. I'd give them a minimum of 9 to 10 months in jail. They ruined the experience for those that were in the museum, ruined future would be museum goers, raised security concerns, at least, in this world famous museum, possibly hurt the museum's profit margins, etc.

@user-iu4wh1zs6t

5 ай бұрын

​@@martincatoniryan1638haha. Like you're concerned about fine art. You're only looking to punish those that criticize your apathy.

@duncan.o-vic

5 ай бұрын

It's like you have no concern on what anyone else thinks, and you try to put down anyone who sacrifices their ego to change society for the better.

@dowak3991

5 ай бұрын

"public opinion" well I couldn't care less about some dumb painting.

@DustyB

5 ай бұрын

@@dowak3991funny how it’s more loved and cared for then you will ever be

they defaced the glass not the painting, good choice of words DW very clever...

@silencemeviolateme6076

5 ай бұрын

The acrylic

@huhujojo1968

5 ай бұрын

Slow news week , wars and protests have run their course.

The way I see it is “Advocating for food benefits and complaining about food waste”. All while throwing food at a painting seems a seriously counterproductive. I just don’t see how throwing soup at a painting would change anything. 😢

@presamicke

4 ай бұрын

Would like to know who is creating theese activists

Criminal damage, public disturbance, anti-social behaviour and trespassing are the list of offences which the judge will surely consider

@marciabramson6194

4 ай бұрын

Good to know. ✔️

This is why we can't have nice things.

so glad. I literally talked about it with someone, and the person said, they should put it behind bulletproof glass. We didnt know it already was. So glad.

Have them sweep the museum for a few months as punishment.

bruh some people just have too much time on their hands

@NANICU

5 ай бұрын

And soup

@duncan.o-vic

5 ай бұрын

Maybe we should all be slaves an have no time to think?

@WheresTheSauce

5 ай бұрын

Theyre activists. They probably dont have jobs or families. Their cause is what they care about because that's all they have.

@dowak3991

5 ай бұрын

yeah, imagine having so much time you waste it on going to see a painting.

@nazortube

4 ай бұрын

@@dowak3991 yeah, imagine having so much time you waste it on pro hamas protests with islamists

Vandals

Their cause was so convoluted it made me cross eyed listening to it.

@duncan.o-vic

5 ай бұрын

You listened to a convoluted interpretation of their cause.

@lisilein2

5 ай бұрын

How about putting it into your own words then? I'll start. Activists trying to point out hiw little is being done about the climate crisis throw soup at a sheet of glass.

@pragueexpat5106

5 ай бұрын

I need a Womanese to English translator to understand their cause..

@charless3108

4 ай бұрын

​@@pragueexpat5106Just type "Local Karens in my area"

@monanch

4 ай бұрын

?

Guernica by Picasso is also behind bullet proof glass in the Prado,such a sad statement about our society that art has to be protected this way.

@balsarmy

5 ай бұрын

Yes, but Nietsche would say that great society is societybthat is able to create new art, not just to preserve old. Just saying, I love museums.

@user-iu4wh1zs6t

5 ай бұрын

The more intelligent you are, the more interesting the art becomes. The statement should be that we are a society that invented bullets... Then we invented glass to stop them. We also created profit institutions to show works of art; which incentivised a global theft of art... Not too unlike the destruction of nature to create dildos and boxes.

@C.J.M..

5 ай бұрын

Hardly a statement on society. It’s not like the overwhelming majority would do this. I’d say your comment is a sad statement about society: that the acts of a very small minority somehow is symptomatic of a greater group of people.

@duncan.o-vic

5 ай бұрын

Actually, it's a statement on how there is more effort to protect objects (whose value today is purely historic, not artistic) instead of protecting actual people who can create something useful to a currently living society.

@wolffang489

5 ай бұрын

​@@balsarmy...Are you suggesting that modern art doesn't exist?

to be honest french people are the wildest in the whole europe

@aureliengdt5932

4 ай бұрын

It s not french people

When Mona Lisa posed for the painting way back, She could never Imagined it would come to this... 🤔

@Mutasis_Mutandis

5 ай бұрын

The Mona Lisa was a compilation of several different women, not just one woman.

Imagine being a tourist, having spent a fortune to see the Mona Lisa at the Louvre, only to have it closed because of those vandals.

@stumblingmumbler

5 ай бұрын

Ooh how sad lmao

@soundscape26

5 ай бұрын

Yeah, better not spend a fortune to see a replica behind a glass.

@sertaki

5 ай бұрын

this was probably the most "first world problem" response to this situation that I can imagine.

@sirrathersplendid4825

5 ай бұрын

Well known fact: most people who go to the Louvre spend barely 30 seconds before the Mona Lisa. Few of them even look at all the other amazing treasures in the collection, just simply walk past them.

@haz4dc394

4 ай бұрын

@@sertaki Someone incorrectly using your neopronouns is also a first world problem. Most leftists’ grievances are first world problems. No self awareness.

O respect for those protesters. Only infants make a mess and demands. Someone should tell them politicians don't have offices in museums.

May they spend some serious jail time! Activist should voice their concerns but vandalism is a crime!

I may be in the very small minority: I think that the Mona Lisa painting is overrated.

@justayoutuber1906

4 ай бұрын

It was just that until it got stolen.

@nazortube

4 ай бұрын

queer and other art of progressive bolsheviks is overatted and with ow quality

Are they putting up the screens so we dont see a satisfying arrest?

They will be dismissed as loonies. What a waste of time.

Even if the Mona Lisa's protected by glass, these two ladies still technically committed vandalism because they literally messed with that painting's surroundings.

Shame!!!! It's a once in a lifetime trip for some people to visit that museum. 😢😢😢

@dowak3991

5 ай бұрын

imagine what that says about "some people"

@vtdemocracy7520

5 ай бұрын

@@dowak3991This reply says more about you.

@sirrathersplendid4825

5 ай бұрын

Let’s face it. Most people go only to see the Mona Lisa, basically to tick it off the list. They barely pay attention to all the other wonderful works in the Louvre.

@tgapete01

4 ай бұрын

@@dowak3991 "imagine what that says about "some people" It says they have worked and saved long and hard to make a once in the lifetime journey that they don't take for granted.

Well, it's behind a glass for a reason...

@user-iu4wh1zs6t

5 ай бұрын

There's also a reason you can't get close to it, or use flash photography. It's because knuckle draggers would touch it with their hands or push each other to see it.

@einienj3281

5 ай бұрын

@@user-iu4wh1zs6t Yup.. I was in Amsterdam, in the Van Gogh museum, they had the "sunflowers" in loan. No glass, just a rope and people were crying and coughing and reaching for it..

People are the worst

The staff immediately springs into action...... by grabbing the screens they had at the ready (??) and blocking the view.... but not stopping the vandals. Uh-huh.....

Great way to bring people towards your cause.

I understand the motivation, but hate the method. Do a sit-in in front of it with a banner or something, this way, the thumbnails and pictures on all press will have your banner in it, not some soup making you look ridiculous. Edit: I want to clarify that I am in support of the protest and it was clearly intended to cause no harm to the painting (judging by intervies, the people who targeted it seem to be well aware of the plexiglass!) What I fear is that, as it is already happening, the "oh my god they stained the Mona Lisa" part will take center stage in coverage and not the protest itself.

@TommyV8898

5 ай бұрын

There are sit ins with banners every day. The fact that you don't know, proofs the activists point to get attention through acts like these 'attacks'.

@gmenezesdea

5 ай бұрын

Two years ago a climate scientist literally offes him wlf in front of the supreme court to protest inaction against climate change. No one remembers it, no one talks about it anymore. What does that tell you about effective protests? Just two years ago. Wynn Bruce was his name.

@coccoborg

5 ай бұрын

@@TommyV8898 I get it. The shock value is there for sure. Hitting art seems backwards anyway.

I didn't care yesterday. As of today I think there should be STRICTER LAWS regarding the agricultural system.

Why are they picking on M. Lisa? She wasn't opposed to reforms to the agricultural system... and she loved soup!

@AlexandruVoda

5 ай бұрын

Because it is protected behind glass while other paintings are not and because people ignore the other paintings just to gawk at the this over hyped one. The point is not to destroy the painting, it is to disrupt the comfort and ignorance of others and create noise. Previous such protests also did not damage the art that was defaced.

@anmnou

5 ай бұрын

By all means, be completely humorless...@@AlexandruVoda

@AlexandruVoda

4 ай бұрын

@@anmnou I agree that I was humorless in that reply. Unfortunately, humor and sarcasm does not transmit well through written comments online. Poe's law applies. If we lived in more lighthearted times, online humor would be easier. So many people in this comment section have a complete misunderstanding of how this kind of protest works as evidenced by comments demanding imprisonment. I therefore deemed it appropriate to give a serious answer to why that painting in particular.

If you want to save the future don't destroy paintings. They exist for the future they exist for artists who wish to paint about The issues today just like Bosch painted the Spanish Inquisition. If that had been a Caravaggio I'm telling you I would have thrown down.

Imagine if Campbell's Soup ran an ad here

Where are all the people though? I thought the space next to Mona Lisa was always crowded

Sounds like the sort of thing Donald Trumpf would like to do. It's a good job it's behind the tomato soup-proof glass 😊

Never thought I cared for the Mona Lisa until i read that headline. Had me panicking for a sec.

The real ML is downstairs in a vault.

@DurdensVision

5 ай бұрын

That's what I'm saying... Wonder how many paintings presented are not the originals.

I wonder why this isn't labeled as "art performance"

Imagine your grandma doing something cringy as this. What did it solve?

That is not the real portrait of the Mona Lisa... The real one is hidden somewhere safe.... The Mona Lisa portrait is not that big...

Very disappointing to see DW using a misleading title to grab clicks. I know it is a numbers game but this doesn’t seem to fit in the solid foundation and the trustworthy and unbiased frame of DW. Why make it sound like the painting was damaged, and use the word “defaced” for an art piece that’s protected behind a bullet proof glass. It would still be interesting enough for your type of audience to click even if you used a more honest title. I don’t think the majority of your audience would be people who are looking for titles of “dramatic content”. Both the people who already follow, and the ones that are likely to start following your channel would still click that video even if you reflected the fact on the title as it is in reality, because it’s still news. You are not a KZreadr who stitches short clips of accidents or other dramatic footage together to create content and rely on the title to get clicks. You are in my consideration a respectable news channel and that’s why this little thing irritated me so much! Don’t get me wrong, I’m glad that the painting is not damaged. But it’s quite disappointing that the title was exaggerated to increase clicks. Trust is such a thin line that one should be careful when it’s the main anchor point to their audience!

Clearly the Louvre's soup detectors failed,

The painting is behind bulletproof glass. "Has the painting been damaged?" Hmmm.😀

This is a crime against the world cultural legacy They must put in jail for years!,,,

@V0lk

5 ай бұрын

It was behind glass. relax.

Wow, scholar journalist right there... painting is behind BULLET PROOF glass but asks if the "Soup" had done any damage. Bullet proof yes. Soup proof no.

I don't see such 'activists' going down to Saudi Arabia, protesting about women's rights...

Why would you use such an inflammatory term like “deface” when the art wasn’t harmed?! That’s so dishonest. Yikes, DW.

@anmnou

5 ай бұрын

Look up the definition of defaced. Then try again, darling.

Even the mona lisa is falling apart. "In Tyler we trust"

No, no, no... these activists do not deserve any publicity in the Louvre. If they had any aesthetic sense and an iota of creativity they would have combined the artistic statement with their food choices activism and thrown tomato soup at Andy Warhol's Campbell’s Soup Cans in the MoMA [of course first making sure that art work is protected from tomato soup attack... although thinking about it Andy Warhol may have liked the idea]

About the same as vandalizing their office.. in counter protest, then justifying it.

Good thing the real Mona Lisa is never out they keep it under the museum

What a waste of food.

@ThomasVWorm

5 ай бұрын

Compare this to how much we feed to animals rather than to stop starvation. You cannot feed the world with a can of soup. But you can with millions of tons of soja etc. we do feed animals with.

crazy

I would hope that the consequences be so egregious that any others would think twice before pulling off a stunt as such.

They knew it was protected That’s why they did it to get attention for their cause

The world is safe now 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

Some people just weren't hugged enough by their parents when they were young.

@iii___iii

5 ай бұрын

Just like you

@yvonnecaldwell6088

4 ай бұрын

​​@@iii___iiiwhat, are you 12?!! I bet you say 'your Mum' too🙄

@iii___iii

4 ай бұрын

@@yvonnecaldwell6088 is your dad 12?

I'm sure activists picked the best painting to express their message, because most other paintings in the museum don't have protection and would have caused real damages.

I wonder if these two ladies were arrested or if they received a fine. Or did the staff just let them go? В нашей стране их бы скрутили быстрее, чем стали закрывать ширмами место происшествия.

This picture means nothing to this world.

They need to be charged.

@monanch

4 ай бұрын

?

DW team using a click bait title is not up to reputation.

The look on Mona Lisa's face says it all; "you are sad, silly girls"

Is the message that we should all be eating more soup.

What is the point of seeing the real one when there is super resolution digital ones

A souper painting.

Of course it's not the original painting. The real one is too precious to display even in a bullet proof casing. Having been attacked too many times they know it's risky to hang it there.

I've watched several reports on this already and still couldn't tell you what activist group they're with. Not doing a great job getting your word out there, I'd say.

Protest food by throwing food…. Makes sense to me….🤔

Even pictures have to deal with crazy people.

This is so weird

Headless chicken

From here in England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 to 🇫🇷 Paris we understand the need for people to be seen or heard by the way of protest but as long as protesting is harmful 👍 & peaceful 👍 then there is no reason for the world 🌎 to not take notice of protesting so I say this ( ALL POWER & RESPECT TO ALL PROTESTERS AROUND THE W🌎 RLD )

And no one did anything to these criminals? Isn't that called vandalism?

So...the world is a far better place now, isn't it?

That soup couldve been put to better use in my stomache :(

Where are the guards? Police? Security? Why do they let these vandals keep escaping punishment? All around bizarre behaviour.

LMAO! Those two definitely are a few sandwiches short of a picnic. Wtf were they thinking? 😂

dietary revolution... that seems like a personal choice in a democratic country

@biocapsule7311

5 ай бұрын

Actually no, personal choice is limited to the availability of sector control output. Just because you want to eat healthy by choice, doesn't mean there are a wide range of healthy option in the market at affordable prices, if at all. Especially in a corporatized market, the customer's want doesn't determine the goods you get. The companies decide what is available in the market. For the purpose of food, you can have 4-5 different companies putting out a range of food, each 25 variety. But none of them healthy, you still end up with zero choice. Most people ignore how much companies decides for you, because you are given an illusion of choice in the variety of the same product. Doesn't just apply to food of course.

@yungwallzy

5 ай бұрын

@@biocapsule7311 good explanation 👏

@mikekane2492

5 ай бұрын

@@biocapsule7311 Are you kidding? I'm broke and I eat healthier than most middle and upper class people. Absolutely no one buys oats, rice cakes or brown rice/pasta so it's dirt cheap. Turkey, tofu and kidney beans are also cheap sources of protein. You can buy 12kg bags of oats for about $14 and it lasts over 6 months. It actually costs a lot more eating junk food. Vegetables can be pricey but again, you'd be spending more buying a block of cheese. I honestly have no idea what people are talking about when they say healthy food costs more. Maybe if the idea of healthy is eating salmon and high quality blueberries? But I'd argue you don't need that level of quality unless you're a competitive athlete and the benefits you'd see from it would be marginal. The idea we're forced to eat junk food because of capitalism is honestly just bunk.

@biocapsule7311

5 ай бұрын

@@mikekane2492 And where do you live? Because it does depend massively on where you live. Btw who told you Salmon is only for competitive athlete? And those you think are dirt cheap and healthy are debatable at best. Just because you have a cheap sources of protein does not mean that's all you need to be healthy. There is just surviving and there is healthy. You eat healthier then most middle & upper class?? And prey tell how would you know that? Do you routinely go thru their trash to tabulate what they eat? And we haven't even touch on the advocacies of national health campaigns. *But MOST IMPORTANTLY that is beside the point, which you clearly miss entirely.* It has nothing to do with what you can afford to buy, rather what IS available for you to buy. Take Bre*!t in short: Bre*!teer claims leaving will protect home grown agriculture, instead it made the sector unsustainable, poof, one option gone. Which has far greater consequences then just loosing options. And the cost may fall to you, because that option may disappear before it can even trickle-down. The whole food pyramid and an assortment of health diet myths last century was due to lack of understanding, industry lobbying. So for decades, most of the first world aren't even particularly aware of healthy living. So for decades, the choice are entirely limited by the industries. A better example is environmental protect and climate change. Because it's almost entirely down to the choice of governments and companies, not the individual consumers. Sometimes it's entirely due to the limits of technology itself, not everything is malicious greed or incompetence. And that's not even counting the trends that didn't take vs. the trends that did took hold. If something becomes an industry 'norm', then that is limit of your choices. The key is that you don't know what is anti-consumer, what is not. I only use 1 word of 'affordable prices', so that I cover as much possible reasons, and there are many. Yet that is the only thing you see?? Whatever you are eating, it's clearly not helping your mental capacity. I can go on and on, but if you are really going to die on the hill of capitalism (which wasn't even the point I was making). Feel free to ask the Cocoa farmers who has never tasted chocolate, how much options in live do they have.

@biocapsule7311

5 ай бұрын

@@mikekane2492 My longer comment got 'disappeared' so I will make it shorter. And where do you live? Because it does depend massively on where you live. Btw who told you Salmon is only for competitive athlete? And those you think are dirt cheap and healthy are debatable at best. There is just surviving and there is healthy. You eat healthier then most middle & upper class?? And prey tell how would you know that? Do you routinely go thru their trash to tabulate what they eat? And we haven't even touch on the advocacies of national health campaigns. *But MOST IMPORTANTLY that is beside the point, which you clearly miss entirely.* It has nothing to do with what you can afford to buy, rather what IS available for you to buy. A better example is environmental protection and climate change. Because it's almost entirely down to the choice of governments and companies, not the individual consumers. Sometimes it's entirely due to the limits of technology itself, not everything is malicious greed or incompetence. And that's not even counting the trends that didn't take vs. the trends that did took hold. If something becomes an industry 'norm', then that is limit of your choices. The key is that you don't know what is anti-consumer, what is not. I only use 1 word of 'affordable prices', so that I cover as much possible reasons, and there are many. Yet that is the only thing you see?? Whatever you are eating, it's clearly not helping you. I can go on and on, but if you are really going to die on the hill of cap!tal!sm (which wasn't even the point I was making). Feel free to ask the Cocoa farmers who has never tasted chocolate, how much options in live do they have.

Very happy to find out it was protected. It's been my dream to go to that museum and it would've broken my heart if the Mona Lisa got damaged.

The only thing ''defaced'' was the painting's protective glass screen.

I think you misspelled the word criminals with activists.

O. Herry-Style Ending: unexpected, but reasonable

No one rushed to arrest them !

Vandalism is not acceptable.