So basically an infinity that encompasses all infinities both comprehensible and incomprehensible and completely disregarding any and all limitations. Cool concept.

@blizzard1198

10 ай бұрын

Isnt that just straight up orinary or plain infinity?

@onetis2629

10 ай бұрын

@@blizzard1198 Imagine all odd numbers like 1, 3, 5, ... this would go on until infinity right? Now imagine all positive numbers like 1, 2, 3, ... this would also go on until infinity. As you can see, both of these go on until infinity, but one is clearly bigger than the other. Just like that there is a hierarchy of infinities transcending each other. The True Infinitely that they are referring to in the video is probably the "infinity" that encompass all such hierarchies that we know of and beyond. Of course this is just how I understand it, so I might be wrong.

@Progen1A

10 ай бұрын

@@onetis2629 so basically this infinity is bigger than the other infinity because of (set explanation)?

@Lucifer276

8 ай бұрын

@@onetis2629 oh

@Lucifer276

8 ай бұрын

@@onetis2629does anything beyond numbers (specifically beyond numbers means beyond calculation and measurements, numerics) be depict as absolute infinity.?

[Based On Consistency Strength] Levels Of Infinity 0. Aleph cardinal 1. Inaccessible cardinal 2. Mahlo cardinal 3. Weakly compact cardinal 4. Indescribable cardinal 5. Berkeley cardinal 6. Limit club Berkeley cardinal 7. Totally indescribable cardinal 8. Supercompact cardinal 9. Almost huge cardinal 10. Huge cardinal 11. Rank-into-rank cardinal 12. Extendible cardinal 13. Vopěnka's principle 14. Reinhardt cardinal 15. Berkeley cardinal (Reinhardt-Cardinal-Axiom) 16. Hyper-Mahlo cardinal 17. Woodin cardinal 18. Shelah cardinal 19. Vast cardinal 20. Strong cardinal 21. Almost Ramsey cardinal 22. Ramsey cardinal 23. Measurable cardinal 24. Almost huge measurable cardinal 25. Huge measurable cardinal 26. Weakly measurable cardinal 27. Indestructible cardinal 28. Jonsson cardinal 29. Rowbottom cardinal 30. Extendible limit of Woodin cardinals 31. Berkeley limit of Woodin cardinals 32. Berkeley limit of supercompact cardinals 33. Berkeley limit of Berkeley cardinals 34. Berkeley limit of Reinhardt cardinals 35. Berkeley limit of Berkeley limits 36. Berkeley limit of Berkeley limits of Reinhardt 37. Berkeley limit of Berkeley limits of Berkeley Loop

@laurenmatius

10 ай бұрын

27 may have an error

@Rewrite111

10 ай бұрын

Ok Thanks for this great video and the levels of infinity [Based On Consistency Strength]

@Rewrite111

10 ай бұрын

How long did it take you to write this?

@danielstephenson3269

10 ай бұрын

This one actually makes me think about something, which may as well be fallacious, but I'll share the idea. Since there's practically an endless quantity of cardinalities of infinity in Set Theory, could we theoretically place even higher mathematical extensions by making up multiple "Set Theories" with their variation of 1 fully surpassing all said cardinals of infinity in the standard Set Theory? I guess we could theoretically achieve this by increasing the set of the main digits (0 to 9) with completely different symbols, which would in turn further increase the gaps of that Set Theory's tens, hundreds, thousands, etc. Maybe shove some basic ontological transcendence in there as well just to seal it. This is all for powerscaling's sake btw. This might just scale to Hyper or something. I'm ready to hear opinions.

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

​@@danielstephenson3269 Most of mathematics actually does not rely on the representation of numbers. Only basic arithmetic does, and even there most of the algorithms you learn for that (taking sums of numbers with multiple digits, long division, …) work the same with any fixed-radix positional number system (such as decimal, binary or hexadecimal). Introducing an infinite fixed-radix positional number system could potentially lead to new insights or perspectives in certain mathematical areas, but it wouldn't change the core principles of set theory and its relationships with cardinalities, infinite sets, and mathematical operations. Aside from practical matters, there is no real difference, its impact on the broader field of set theory would depend on the specific details and implications of the proposed system.

Damn... Always W Daddy FM ❤️‍🔥

And some people still waiting for scaling Hajun...

@Lol-bs3jd

10 ай бұрын

That fodder mf aint passing 6D

@anutheamaranth7433

10 ай бұрын

And Madoka

@CosmicKaderLTD.

10 ай бұрын

​@@Lol-bs3jdMasad is really Fodder + overrated

@cyrus8886

10 ай бұрын

What point are you trying to make ? People want the character scaled let him be scaled What type of brain rot is this

@Unknown_88886

10 ай бұрын

​@@Lol-bs3jdbozo learned scaling from Walmart 😂

The way I think it. Absolute infinity is the amount of objects a proper class has, making it beyond any cardinal. AND, is defined as { *No* || *No* | *No* } in the *No* ^D collection, where *No* is the class of surreal numbers, making it a gap like ∞.

If you are so kind, but also smart enough, can you please simplify cardinals and what it takes to understand them? For example, co-finality for Inaccessible Cardinals, Mahlo Cardinals, Woodin Cardinals along with Elementary Embeddings, Supercompact Cardinals with Reflecting Cardinals as a side-dish, etc. Visuals too if you can or want. This is a big request though, so its aight if you dont want to.

Bkud is goated

i start wonderring how did he got all this knowlege

I mis the old voice 😢 already

Can you please translate to portuguese (Brazil) in subtitles?

there will be an analysis of the cosmology of the DC?

@VoidKingEditz

10 ай бұрын

If i am not wrong there is Modal Realism in humans world, which makes even base Batman high hyperversal

@praisetelesto

10 ай бұрын

@@VoidKingEditz I don't think so tbh. But I have no real proof just from what I can recall. But I honestly don't understand the difference between modal realism and multiverses.

@VoidKingEditz

10 ай бұрын

@@praisetelesto modal realism in simple words, when there are infinite worlds and each of them are different from each other, like physics law,kardashov scale and etc. And in 1 of the DC comics which explains Humans, author said, that Humans from DC can create universes by their thoughts (universe in DC is infinite in size + 11-12 dimensional), and there are infinite possibilities that can be lead by these thoughts which is Modal Realism

@seraex8209

9 ай бұрын

​@@VoidKingEditz that's stupidest shit I've ever heard

basically absolute infinity is beyond all of the comprehensions about maths / set theory / Cardinals / alephs etc so boundless basically

@JimedBro

8 ай бұрын

Actually, considering Absolute Infinity's nature, I'd be beyond any layer of tiering and beyond tiering as it is. Basically, true Absolute Infinity is omnipotence

Scale Madoka

So Ouroboros

Ok

So basiclly absolute infinite is God sense it is suppost to be the presence of the divine and the ultimate reallty and is so big it doesnt have size and is beyond human comprehanchon sounds like God

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

Yeah

The theological and spiritual interpretation shouldn't be consider but apart of that, i agree

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

Why? It's deeply rooted in the notion of absolute infinity itself, it's mathematical philosophy. Cantor based it on God and religion, it shoundn't be left out.

@lolproo

10 ай бұрын

@@archeopteryx5465 first; the concept of god is different in philosophy and theology. Second, yeah, Cantor links absolute infinity with god but more in a philosophical way and third the absolute infinity of Cantor isn't a religion, there no being to be worshiped and no one do it

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

@@lolproo I've never said that Cantor's absolute infinity was a religion though? I said that he based it on God and religion? Also yes he did religiously not much philosophy like you're suggesting.

@lolproo

10 ай бұрын

@@archeopteryx5465 if something is based on religion, doesn't mean that that thing is a religion thing (yeah, before i kinda contradict so my error) because in that case, no science discovery made in the 16th is not a religion thing. So yeah, the absolute infinity is a thing that religions initiated but that no mean that any interpretation of that is also a religion thing. No, he didn't religiously because religion is a cultural thing and Cantor didn't make something cultural, he made a philosophical thought of what is absolute infinity

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

@@lolproo Ok but that wouldnt that be set theory while the Absolute infinite would be a religious thing? He never made it to be mathematical in the first place, it's just that it is because it references his work. He wanted to improve the church teachings by using that. He went as far a discussing it with a church cardinal

2:16 man took time to clarify gay stuff in explaining absolute infinity

Apophatic Theology = The Absolute

Next: Kabbhala?

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

Yes, Good Topic I Think Kahballaism Is A Religious Philosophical Concept Or More Likely The Apophatic Theology But I Maybe Wrong

@valdirenerodrigues2051

9 ай бұрын

​@@RealGoku213So would kether and the 4 worlds be the most powerful structures of all existing structures up to 1-T?

So it's outer in both csap and vsbw? Cool.

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

Vsbw Is Probably Infinite Layers Into Boundless Csap Is Maybe Outer To High Outer

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

It's scales nowhere

@pedro_suricataboss3197

10 ай бұрын

​@@archeopteryx5465How?

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

@@pedro_suricataboss3197 Because there can't be a largest set of cardinals. The Absolute Infinite is so big that it has no size. The size of a set is its cardinality, and we can assign cardinalities to both finite and infinite sets. By Cantor's theorem, one can generate an infinite sequence of infinite sets whose infinite sizes are larger and larger infinities. There is no end to this, no largest infinite set. Cantor viewed the Absolute Infinite as being a terminal or limiting notion to such increase, i.e, the Absolute Infinite is such that it cannot be further increased. But Cantor's paradox shows that we can’t collect all the infinite sizes of sets into a set. Since it is not a set, we can’t assign a cardinality to it. It is just so big that it breaks the notion of size itself. Edit: At *pure face value* it's beyond tiering system ig. But it's like an NLF, omnipotency, etc... It depends on the context

@DJ1125katus

10 ай бұрын

@@RealGoku213 not even close without context it doesn't even reach low-outer in both scaling system as well.

Hi

Auren the Absolute 😫

Can you explain how levels of infinity work in powerscaling? Like how the Cardinals correspond to the level of infinity like a type 4 multiverse?

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

Type IV Multiverse Aint Cardinal Bro 💀

@Baal-Zebub

10 ай бұрын

@@unknown_1397 Regardless of the existing large cardinals, the Absolute Infinite will always be superior as an incomprehensible property that acts as the completion of all sets in the universe of sets. Even though Cantor doesn't know all the large cardinals, the Strong Reflection Principle and its ineffability in universe of sets means that it doesn't matter if he or Set Theory only cited alephs, the Absolute Infinite will be superior to large cardinals.

@Baal-Zebub

10 ай бұрын

@@unknown_1397 Do you have Disc?

@Murphy_Law

9 ай бұрын

High infinities (Large Cardinals in specific) uses consistency strength in order to measure it's size. Cardinals corresponds through x proving the existence of y which proves that x has a higher consistency strength than y or x > y. Also Type IV isn't a structure but a hypothetical model of the multiverse which isn't a cardinal.

@Murphy_Law

9 ай бұрын

​@@Baal-Zebubhow does this prove that Absolute Infinity has a higher consistency strength than ZFC?

This Is Kinda NLF If It Transcend Everything Above It Or Below It

@BetterbowI

10 ай бұрын

its not nlf because there are characters that transcend math like The Scarlet King, Yog-Sothoth, I AM THAT I AM, etc.

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

​@@BetterbowIit's not all math though

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

​@@BetterbowII Said Absolute Transcendence Not Math Transcendence Absolute > Fodder Math

@Baal-Zebub

10 ай бұрын

That's not even the definition of a no limits fallacy. No limits fallacy just says because a character has not demonstrated limits, they are Limitless. It is different from something implied as without limits, because those are its intrinsic properties. One is just an assumption, while the other is a real property of the thing.

@BetterbowI

10 ай бұрын

@@RealGoku213 absolute infinty is a mathematical concept

Hey project can you make a video about SCP EN branch They say EN branch is fodder They have debunked EN branch after asking for proofs they say 'come to discord' and I don't use discord I have countered more than 100 people who claim they have debunked EN branch So i would like to listen it form you

@ziadhulhok

9 ай бұрын

It's high outer from what I am hearing.

Could you scale SCP EN branch?

Auren the absolute 😃👍

@guystupid3148

7 ай бұрын

Wait so that means he return???

Next Bro Please... Barkley And Reinhardt

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

​@@Gol.D.Roger270hajun is useless and im talking about complex mathematics topic

@Murphy_Law

10 ай бұрын

In summary, Berkeley's and Reinhardt's Cardinals are a mathematic concept in which there is a non trivial elementary embedding in which J : V --> V. This contradicts with the Axiom Of Choice due to the Kunen Inconsistency Theorem proving that there is no formula J in the language of set theory when it comes to V such that for some parameter p∈V for all sets x∈V and y∈V: j(x) = y J(x,y,p), this proves that there is no definable elementary embedding of V into V thus they are part of ZF Theory.

@Murphy_Law

10 ай бұрын

@@Gol.D.Roger270 are you referring to @RealGoku213 or me?

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

​@@Murphy_Lawhmm so its likely beyond mathematics itself and beyond even cantor's absolute infinity?

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

​@@Gol.D.Roger270stop asking me dude

Please about: scaling Hajun from Masadaverse. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

@arielquelme

10 ай бұрын

High outerversal.. No more than that

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

@@arielquelme based

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

I Dont Think It Reaches Boundless

@herdianto9795

10 ай бұрын

Hajun just 24 D ( hyperversal)

@Unknown_88886

10 ай бұрын

​@@herdianto9795stop the meth intake

Absolute infinity: I'm the biggest Fictional googology & extended model realism: hello

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

???

@pedro_suricataboss3197

10 ай бұрын

Fictional googology is MCU Wolverine victim.

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

Googology Is Just 100 Or 300 And Infinity Is Unending Digits

@pedro_suricataboss3197

10 ай бұрын

​@@archeopteryx5465Fictional googology is a wiki fandom about cardinals beyond absolute infinity like "absolute end" or "true end" and nothing can be bigger than absolute infinity because it is the omnipotent itself, further more fictional googology gets molested by Stu Macher.

@thestrangerontheinternet8432

10 ай бұрын

That’s a fandom lmaoooo

So the mondelbrot diagram is an example of absolute infinity 💀

Where the old voice

@zainulabideen5490

10 ай бұрын

According to project FM, using old voice again and again is boring

@harrishromero6447

10 ай бұрын

@@zainulabideen5490 but it iconic

@harrishromero6447

10 ай бұрын

@@zainulabideen5490 and the new one is annoying

@zainulabideen5490

10 ай бұрын

@@harrishromero6447 yeah🍷🗿but its his choise

@zainulabideen5490

10 ай бұрын

@@harrishromero6447 hey dude which verse is stronger Wod or scp Can you prove that??

So... Does Absolute Infinitt Transcend Maths?

@juhabach7922

10 ай бұрын

No

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

I mean yes and no.. Because Cantor firmly related God too it in a way yes

@RealGoku213

10 ай бұрын

​@@archeopteryx5465If Absolute Infinity Does Not Transcend Mathematics Then How Is Absolute Infinity Even High Outerversal?

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

@@RealGoku213 The absolute infinite is nowhere near outer. Who told you that? The Absolute Infinite is so big that it has no size. The size of a set is its cardinality, and we can assign cardinalities to both finite and infinite sets. By Cantor's theorem, one can generate an infinite sequence of infinite sets whose infinite sizes are larger and larger infinities. There is no end to this, no largest infinite set. Cantor viewed the Absolute Infinite as being a terminal or limiting notion to such increase, i.e, the Absolute Infinite is such that it cannot be further increased. But Cantor's paradox shows that we can’t collect all the infinite sizes of sets into a set. Since it is not a set, we can’t assign a cardinality to it. It is just so big that it breaks the notion of size itself. Edit: At *pure face value* it's beyond tiering system ig. But it's like an NLF, omnipotency, etc... It depends on the context. If some verse strongest character is outerversal then in this context the absolute would be high outer etc...

@Murphy_Law

10 ай бұрын

Absolute Infinity is more of a philosophical based interpretation of mathematics however it's still bounded by it due to V = L proving that all sets can be constructed

Batman scales to this since he created the Batcave which has been stated "Host the absolute infinity of solutions" and he is one of the weakest! DC is the strongest verse

@yassin_menshawy3316

10 ай бұрын

Are you joking?

@archeopteryx5465

10 ай бұрын

@@yassin_menshawy3316 looks obvious to me

@danielstephenson3269

10 ай бұрын

With prep time he prolly does 👍 Unless if you don't think the joke's funny. If that's the case then he scales way lower

@yassin_menshawy3316

10 ай бұрын

@@archeopteryx5465 yea

@yassin_menshawy3316

10 ай бұрын

@@danielstephenson3269 Batman with prep time is overrated to be honest

hajun is the strongest in faction

@lordAnimation11

10 ай бұрын

@@Penteract-096 Bro Hajun Above Tier system Hajun with Tumor Can destroy Scp Very Easily

@lordAnimation11

10 ай бұрын

@@Penteract-096 Becouse Hajun has beyond Taikyokus 5 Taikyokus =Boundless He has Beyond Taikyokus So he Higher boundless

@Hazel564

9 ай бұрын

@@lordAnimation11 one taikyou is high outerversal even if you have infinite taikyou it will be H1A+ but even if you put another infinite hierchies of H1A+ you can never reach 0(just like outer+ to high outer) also you masadaverse clowns dont even know how hajun power and laws work his law is not being bound by numeretical value so that doesnt mean he is boundless just not bound by numeretical value thats why hes immeasurable taikyou which means cant be counted(also if you say immeasurable>inacessible you are a clown) even if he have infinite taikyou hes still H1A+

@dorkybutt

9 ай бұрын

What is this hajun fanboy on about of hajun being higher boundless💀

@Lucifer276

9 ай бұрын

​@@Hazel564😮😮

First