My favorite review vids. The product video at the beginning is always beautiful! What do you use for replay Murph? What I like best is how you've broken every review into the separate chapters. It's clear and super concise. It's professional.

Did you mention the KNS 81 which gives you RNAV capabilities based on VORs and not GPS? I think that's a feature worth mentioning since it is one of the only planes featuring this navigation option. Solid video as always.. stay awesome!

Great video review. But you’re misusing the word “Glareshield”. The glareshield is the top part of the instrument panel up by the windshield. Think automobile dashboard separate from the gauges or instruments. Maybe I misunderstood something but twice you seem to call the instrument panel a glareshield.

I've noticed that both my A36 Bonanza as well as my TBM 850, both from blacksquare; both reaces update 0.1.1 - then nothing more. I wished, since this is a fine product that there could be more added to the mod, if so only more liverys etc (but hoping for more than that of course).

Wasn´t that a rather low score for the most sophisticated and detailed GA-airplane ever made (at least until the Duke is released)? The intense amount of possible failures, all circuit breakers functional, the superb amount of possible radio stack options which allow to get all these navigation screens out of the cockpit to fly VOR only like in the nineties instead of mangenta-line-boredom everyone does nowadays, the intense howl of the turbocharger and the awesome night lighting is a 5 out of 5 :)

Now what we need is a Turboprop A36 variant!

Great vid as usual and more importantly….congrats bro on surpassing 12K subs!!!

@twotonemurphy

4 ай бұрын

Thank you so much mate

TURBINE CONVERSION. 👍👍

Flippin' heck you're MILES behind on this. It's been out over a year! I thought perhaps a new update had been released.

@gibboireland

4 ай бұрын

Not behind at all. How does it compare to the rest. Chill dude.

No idea how you scored this below the very poor Carenadob182 RG. I think your points system needs and overhaul.

@mmm0513

4 ай бұрын

Why you think the 182rg is bad? I actually like it a good bit

@twotonemurphy

4 ай бұрын

Well one of them is a stand alone aircraft with its own model, sounds, features etc and this one is a systems overhaul based on a default aircraft. Considering that it’s an overhaul vs it’s own aircraft, I think my scoring reflects the high quality and fidelity of this add on

@BobC250

4 ай бұрын

@@twotonemurphy- Nah. He's right. However you want to label or categorize is, this beautiful addon should be coming miles ahead of any Carenado offering.

@twotonemurphy

4 ай бұрын

@@BobC250 that’s why I appreciate the feedback! It’s more than alright to disagree with my scoring and the points being raised are indeed valid ones. But I still think my points on this are accurate - at least from my perspective

I enjoyed watching another review from you but I have to say I disagree on the scoring for some of the categories, especially in relation to how you scored other planes. You were praising the visuals inside out and then score it 3.5 ? Why so low ? I mean I get it, it's the default model on the outside but still, 3.5? Seems very low to me. The inside, as you said, looks great and the Asobo exterior is good enough. Then the systems. You say everything is modeled; failures, wear and tear, and only score it a 4? I mean 4 is what you scored the Carenado 182 for the systems... I wonder how many out there will agree that these 2 planes are on the same level in terms of systems modeling ;) And the flight model, which is only improved, and gets a whole 1 sentence mention in the product features (I wonder why), and which you say is "solid" gets a 4 too ? I mean BS are famous for their systems modeling, not flight models. How can their Bonanza score the same in these categories? IMO this plane deserves at least 4 for the visuals, 4.5 for systems, maybe 4 for the flight model and probably 3.5-4 for the sounds, I'd say 3.5 because it's mostly just default sounds.

@twotonemurphy

4 ай бұрын

Many thanks for your feedback and it’s great to read your opinions on the scoring. When considering the visuals I looked for static elements, door openings, number of liveries etc. Systems, and whilst I think they are excellent- there are some missing features. In saying that I am aware they are bringing a new EFB out with the Duke so maybe they will add this to the rest of the fleet. If so, I will certainly revisit. The flight model has received tweaks by the developer and of all the default aircraft by Asobo, the Bonanza felt very close to the real thing.

Hello, so where can I find this add on?

@twotonemurphy

4 ай бұрын

It’s available from the Just Flight website

A big error by Asobo is the dynamic reg. number. The US N registered aircraft don 't heve the number under the left wing like in Europe or Australia. Same for NZ. I personally prefer the old non changeable option. The real turbocharged version have also some different air intakes on the nose. Most old Bonanza today on sale are upgraded with more modern glass cockpit. Despite this it is in my wishlist since long time. I like the new rewiew system. Do more and more of them.

I would’ve paid extra for a V-tail version alongside what they put out.

@davidtsw

4 ай бұрын

just wait for the proper one from A2A, it'll be a V tail anyway.

@twotonemurphy

4 ай бұрын

V-Tail would handle very differently but I would love a V-Tail with the level of complexity that JF and Blacksquare could produce

@ricardograde5134

4 ай бұрын

@@twotonemurphysecond that….

do the doors open? I used too own a carenado with all the bells and whistles..doors and windows opened so why do we have to settle for this sad and incomplete plane in msfs. And look at you loving this unfinished bird . Wow, I thought you had some taste.

Overpriced

@juliashenandoah3965

4 ай бұрын

No it´s not. Black Square doing the best most sophisticated insanely detailed aircraft ever developed for any sim, on par with the Hotstart Challenger for X-Plane :)