Love the discussion of linguistics

the destructive irrational meanness does exist in different irrational animals and it’s completely different than the pure constructive human intelligence!

all I have written must reach future generations clean and intact, including what transfers psychological traits through the transplantation of vital organs (Heart), how personal identity generated (body, environment, inherited psychological characteristics,…. etc) are 100% correct. future generations will reach a point while they make scientific progress where they have no chance to survive as rational intelligent human entities without knowing all that.

what uses both temporary memory and permanent memory is the exact same thing, the way temporary memory triggers the memories in the permanent memory indicates to that. all I have written about how self concept generates both consciousness type one and personal identity, perception,…. etc is 100% correct. it’s highly advanced technology.

The mechanism of how the brain works in relation to human languages ​​is very complex, and to simplify understanding, speaking a language fluently is similar to how humans learn to drive cars and some sports to become an automated process, and this may seem like a simple thing because humans do not realize the mechanism of its work, but it is a very complex process in which highly sophisticated calculations are used cerebellum, etc.). Of course, the psychological factor has a pivotal role in the mastering process…

using permanent memory as malleable forms is very efficient strategy, it’s very likely that the same strategy is used for direct access to memory (mirroring both temporary and permanent memories), in such strategy it’s possible to attach information and emotions to such a malleable forms, and very likely solidifying memories during sleep is correct.. the current approach of accessing memory in computer science is inefficient. It is possible to use radio waves technology to match transmitted frequencies for direct memory access (tuning in).

This is very important: most of what has been written about types of memory, especially its classification, is incorrect due to a lack of understanding of what is happening! For example: Episodic Memory, Semantic Memory, Procedural Memory, Short-Term Memory and Working Memory, Sensory Memory, ,Prospective Memory,…. etc. They do not differentiate between different types of (memory processing), so they mix things up as usual and invent new types of memory regularly! For example, procedural memory, which has a direct relationship to the role of consciousness type two in processing memory, as in the case of riding a bike, driving a car, playing sports, etc. (cerebellum, etc.), as well as the process of processing sensory data (perception) through consciousness type two and the temporary memory it requires... etc. There is a type of cache memory, but its working mechanism and idea differ, especially in terms of content and role , etc. permanent Memory is stored and classified according to type,… and feelings,…, etc and information are added to it. Bottom line: Most of what has been written about types of memory is incorrect! A very simple level of thinking. For example, they believe that linking imagination to manipulating stored memories is a new discovery! Human Memory is complex topic that needs rational intelligent entities to understand!

For example, humans who speak the mother tongue rely on awareness, not consciousness type one , so they speak confidently and fluently (awareness is the result of conscious thinking process), they rely on conscious thinking process only if there’s something ambiguous or unclear to analyse. and perception is related to consciousness type two (turns Sensory data into Sensory data information to be ready for consciousness type one “conscious thinking process”),…etc

Yes, that is certain and very clear. They have transformed some data and memories processing locations in the brain into memory locations based on function as a result of misunderstanding of what is going on in the brain, etc.! But that is wrong of course! This is the reason for the different types and wrong classifications of memory!

“Charan Ranganath: Human Memory, Imagination, Deja Vu, and False Memories | Lex Fridman Podcast Lex Fridman” Listen carefully to the introduction and then to attaching the information to memory, etc. Doesn’t the similarity and timing seem strange?!

Lucky…. ! Different world!

Humans use templates (using permanent memory as malleable molds “imprint”) for sentences and this has a direct relationship to mirroring both temporary memory and permanent memory, so future generations of humans must replicate it in AI so that direct transmission of the templates becomes possible “direct matching is very essential “. For the same reason, there is a difference between awareness and consciousness, where humans are already aware of the templates (awareness is the result of conscious process so they don’t need to repeat the exact same conscious process again and again). Permanent memory is used as a flexible template (malleable molds) and that’s more efficient, quicker and effective, temporary memory is similar but the processes on permanent memory are more complicated. to concise: such a templates contain the result of previous conscious processing so no need to repeat the exact same processes (that is why such malleable forms of memory are very efficient). this is for future generations only.

Special cases of humans who are able to remember what they see in all its details such scanning pages of books or buildings of a city,…etc, are due to transferring what is processed in the occipital lobe (the self uses consciousness type two to perform perception “transforms sensory data into sensory information “, which requires temporary memory) directly to permanent memory (the reason behind this requires understanding everything that was previously written). to concise: understanding the working mechanism of Limbic system will help future generations to make highly advanced technology, but it’s a weak point. The working mechanism of the human brain is very advanced and complex, and the patching techniques they use to understand the working mechanism of the human brain will not work (impossible).

Temporary memory is not a human innovation, but rather a requirement. What has been written about the types of memory and their classifications in neuroscience is incorrect. There is temporary memory, permanent memory, and a type of cache memory, but its working mechanism and contents are different than cache memory in computers. They look at human brain activity and interpret it as a different type of memory (processing requires temporary memory and uses cache memory and permanent memory, but their classifications are wrong). Yes, it is strange, but what was written previously that it is possible to process memory without the need for the limbic system is correct (the limbic system is the weak point). The bottom line is that what processes sensory data, motor data, etc., is the same and uses the same type of memory, and the difference results from the type of processing and not a different type of memory (they attribute different types of processes to different types of memories! but that’s wrong).

6:00 This is inaccurate and far from reality. Humans may use this during the learning or analysis process, but humans use models (or readymade forms) for matching, which is faster, more efficient, and more effective. It is clear that she depends on the idea of ​​​​compilers and language processing programs in computer science!