For all war and history geeks... Are kits with tank models on your Santa's wish list? Which one?

@Xyb3rTeCh

5 жыл бұрын

No. 3 - There is no such thing as Object 269. The one that you are looking for is the Object 279.

@shrekfanboy1734

5 жыл бұрын

The Infographics Show no

@matt_44882

5 жыл бұрын

Yes! Tiger 2, t-34, and others

@spacemonkey037

5 жыл бұрын

The only thing thats on my wish list is that you get your FACTS RIGHT!!!

@maryheadpoppins3242

5 жыл бұрын

@Jakob Pistola PL-01 is bmp

*draws t34* *calls it kv1* *its actually kv2*

@urby5996

5 жыл бұрын

You know that zinoviy kolobanov stopped tank division at leningrad with his KV-1

@overlord4404

5 жыл бұрын

@@urby5996 yeah, but he mentions that crew was latter killed by grenades, that means its the monster of raseiniai

@acceleratergun7597

5 жыл бұрын

Actually, it's not known whether the tank at Raseiniai was a KV-1 or a KV-2.

@whatinthefuckisahandle

5 жыл бұрын

@@acceleratergun7597 it was a KV-2 there are even pictures of it

@edinpok5481

5 жыл бұрын

@@whatinthefuckisahandle yea i think also its kv2

4:06 : The Abrams is the most technologically advanced tank in the world 5:50 : The T 14 is the most advanced tank in the world

@michelangelangelo7091

5 жыл бұрын

Meta *HMMMMMMM*

@SpheroJr3289

5 жыл бұрын

HMMMMMM

@swordfish4621

5 жыл бұрын

HMMMM

@bazinga3160

5 жыл бұрын

@Snickering Ginger "4:06 : The Abrams is the most technologically advanced tank in the world 5:50 : The T 14 is the most advanced tank in the world" The word service was not mentioned once in that statement.

@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385

5 жыл бұрын

HHMMMMMM..........

T-90 has the biggest cannon Laughs in kv2

@SS-zd6yi

5 жыл бұрын

KV-2? Laughs in Sturmtiger

@shake_well

5 жыл бұрын

Sɪᴍᴏɴ Sᴇɴᴀᴠɪᴇᴠ it aint a tank

@SS-zd6yi

5 жыл бұрын

@@shake_well Oh... I can see you are one of the bois who don't know what a tank is

@papameowmeow8236

5 жыл бұрын

kv 2 has a howitzer, not a cannon. the su100y (example) hold a 130mm naval cannon

@szyszkimarcin8736

5 жыл бұрын

HAHAHAH ultra laughs in schwerer gustav (802mm canon)

please do a ''50 insane wrong facts in our videos''

@alexroode4104

5 жыл бұрын

melnibone oeo I’m curious if that would shock me

@amiigaf4476

5 жыл бұрын

Hmmm. Your comment is.. Perfection. Like.

@alisonarnett3484

5 жыл бұрын

They don’t have to their already is this one

@Jeff194gaming

5 жыл бұрын

OUR

@asneecrabbier3900

5 жыл бұрын

Alex Roode i have a hand zapper if u want

the lack of research and the amount of wrong actually hurts

@berndlauert1046

5 жыл бұрын

Word

@bunkerxwaffles3422

5 жыл бұрын

chasebh89 I know

@rpurves80

5 жыл бұрын

I'm upset as well do your goddamn research properly next time and redo this whole video please draw the KV-1 in that reupload (VK 36.01 was never mass produced)

@M8Oktoberfest

5 жыл бұрын

@@rpurves80 cites AMX-56 Leclerc. Says AMX-53. Leclerc never was an AMX tank.

@rpurves80

5 жыл бұрын

@@M8Oktoberfest the VK 36.01 H is a German prototype NOT a French tank that was a prototype in the lead up to the tiger I

Imagine the infographics show, but they do enough research to know that many of the facts are partially or completely incorrect

@steelkat7905

5 жыл бұрын

I second this notion

@Hunter-bm6ss

5 жыл бұрын

yep

@RafidRahim

5 жыл бұрын

Yep too many incorrect facts

@tbt0380

5 жыл бұрын

They used to do research when they had 3 uploads per week. Now they only go for quantity and maximizing views.

@EHAMaviation456

5 жыл бұрын

@@tbt0380 and the worst thing is that braindead sh*tters believe it

"abrams is the most advanced" "t-14 is the most advanced" bruh u forgot about leopard 2 or what?

@Dichtsau

3 жыл бұрын

m8, leopard 3 is in work.

@aaronhuang580

2 жыл бұрын

Uhhh, leopard 2 actually has many flaws. Though it better than Abrams

It's not the P1500 "Monster" it's called a P1000 Ratte and yes that is how it was spelled

@Okkas123

4 жыл бұрын

wasn´t P15000 called "the mouse" in german?

@ny_lium

4 жыл бұрын

Outboard no Maus was a super heavy while p1500 is just a Schwere Gustav on tracks

@zestonsd5717

3 жыл бұрын

The P-1500 is different from P-1000

Correction you can drive a tank just about anywhere in the US as long as you have rubber tracks instead steel. And you can get a permit to have a working cannon on it. You can still have the gun but they cut a hole in the barrel so you can't use it. And you don't need a permit to own a tank. It's like owning a tractor. These are facts

@bop3752

5 жыл бұрын

Dustin Sanders Finally, someone without mental issues.

@triplelp5462

5 жыл бұрын

You can own a tank in nearly every country. In austria, a guy has a Challenger or some other british tank in his garden, and tells the government it is a statue. You can even buy tanks that were deweaponized, but need rubber tracks and a special driving license .

@qwartz1586

5 жыл бұрын

0w0 REALLY!?!

@devontaenash1409

5 жыл бұрын

@@qwartz1586 yes real , the catch is it cost a lot of fucking money to buy one. Cost more that a expensive sports car.

@aboodmki3

5 жыл бұрын

I can own a tank! without permit!!! A used T-72 is only 50k USD away from me 💸

*Says p-1500 monster* *Shows a poorly drawn p-1000 ratte* The p-1500 looked like a rail cannon on tracks, p-1000 had five turrets. One was a 188mm twin naval turret, two were 88mm anti-infantry turrets, two were anti-aircraft turrets, and there was even a cannon mounted on the front. The p-1500 had a non-turret mounted 400mm cannon EDIT: the p-1000 also had three sets of tracks on each side, but they were side-by-side. The p-1500 had four side-by-side sets. They were horrible for turning.

@MihaelTurina

5 жыл бұрын

Actually the naval guns on the Ratte were 280mm, the "anti-infantry turrets" were Maus turrets with 128 mm guns, and the Monster had an 800mm gun, not a 400mm. Other than that I agree.

@veryorignalname4804

5 жыл бұрын

It was a turret from the battlecruiser gneisenau

@isaiahdunbar9614

5 жыл бұрын

I'm glad I'm not the only one who got triggered about that

@josephpbrown

5 жыл бұрын

I thought they were E100 turrets used...

@MrFaina-ng9ct

5 жыл бұрын

CreeperLord gaming 380 mm

dude. the guy who did the researching for the facts should be fired. and the guy who draws things. there's a lot of wrong information in this informative video.

@aorusxtremem1_sam183

5 жыл бұрын

Exactly they haven't even researched it right totally wrong.

10:27 It's true that the film Fury is the only film where a working Tiger tank appeared but the reason for it is that there is only ONE completely working Tiger Tank in the Word. It is in the Bovington Tank Museum (UK) and was captured by the british early 1943 in Africa and then sent to the Museum.

@mEmEzMaN...

3 жыл бұрын

Your welcome From the UK

@tonk_0139

2 жыл бұрын

you said word and not world btw

That was not a KV-1 tank! You drew a T-34 variant. Do your homework.

@iulian29-67

5 жыл бұрын

Also it was a KV-2 that held the german division back Not a KV-1

@mashedpotato238

5 жыл бұрын

Time stamp?

@mathiasandersen3401

5 жыл бұрын

Look they are called Infographics show; Info and graphics, not necessarily info that goes with the graphics and visa versa...

@linders2000

5 жыл бұрын

the last fact isn't a p1500 monster, but a p1000 ratte with extended tracks

@bryan5538

5 жыл бұрын

I also heard that it wasnt a grenade. Appareantly they rolled an anti tank gun to the rear of the tank and shot it making a hole and killing the crew if im not mistaken

Noobs in comments. everyone knows the best tank in the world, is Bob semple. It can easily destroy Abrams, T-14 and one shot challenger mk. 2 at any range, while being immune to the enemy rounds.

@battlemage1327

5 жыл бұрын

Due to many tanks modern explosive armour this is untrue

@Atesz222

5 жыл бұрын

@@battlemage1327 Trust me.. any armor explodes after taking a hit from Bob Semple tank

@notrequired602

5 жыл бұрын

@@battlemage1327 r/woooooooosh

@Koneic

5 жыл бұрын

@@notrequired602 i wanna be in the screenshot with a small smiley face at the end of my comment

@jarrhead3538

5 жыл бұрын

Haunter 74 woooooooosh

10:17 “The T28 super tank...” Cries in T95 turtle 🐢

"A Russian KV Tank" showing a T34-75 fighting Pzkpfw Löwe

@beastbro9823

5 жыл бұрын

Might be a inden panzer

@MfSDD

5 жыл бұрын

@Jace James the VK30.01 is a prototype Tank for the Tiger...

@OltsuSuomesta

5 жыл бұрын

@@MfSDD well, the Löwe wasn't ever even built as a prototype. Also the tanks look like VK 36.01(H)s. You also said T-34-75 when it had a 76mm gun.

@Maxwell_Twist

5 жыл бұрын

I wish he just said "KV tank" so I could give him some benefit of the doubt, but no, he said KV 1 when it was actually a KV 2.

@ivansonnerbrandt2395

3 жыл бұрын

it's not a Löwe, its the prototype turret for the Tiger 1...

4:20 A 125mm is the biggest cannon in the world???? 8:14 It was the KV-2 tank that held aganist the germans for the whole day. Not a KV-1 as you mentioned in the video. They both have the same hull, just the turret on the KV-2 is way bigger because it had a 152mm gun. Also, the KV-2 had 6 crew members while the KV-1 had 5. 10:29 The last running Tiger 1 has the serial number 131, so, surprise-surprise it should be the number 131 not 223. Also, the Tiger 223 was the part of the Waffen SS Battalion and was destroyed. The serial number on the tank was writen way closer to the gun in the 223. I know I could be going through all the miss-animated stuff, but It would take a very long time. Maybe If this gets 50 likes.

@thomasthepanzerkampfwageni2586

5 жыл бұрын

like the German railway cannons

@luckyplayer5305

5 жыл бұрын

The t92 hmc has a bigger gun at 240mm

@the-blues-three

5 жыл бұрын

Sturmtiger 380mm

@ancientwarrior3482

5 жыл бұрын

@@luckyplayer5305 If that counts as tank then does the Schrewer Gustav at 800mm

@anaverageweeb1582

5 жыл бұрын

That's a railroad heavy artillery gun ya know

So much wrong information in this video!!! who does the research ?! ...

@cossmith3116

5 жыл бұрын

I agree.

@manwithaplan27jp37

5 жыл бұрын

Some American on vodka trying to impress a Russian most likely.

@Schnittertm1

5 жыл бұрын

You must be new here, Infographics Show and research? That would be like water not boiling off on the surface of the Sun. You can be lucky if anything they show goes beyond what is on Wikipedia and depeding on the subject Wikipedia can be fairly accurate or grossly inaccurate.

@SomeOne-kj6bo

5 жыл бұрын

Yup.

@maniacalclickz5084

5 жыл бұрын

@@Schnittertm1 bruh they said the biggest cannon on a tank was 125mm... when it wasn't

in love and war, the british have to make tea.

@TheDaltonius

3 жыл бұрын

Yea

@aaronquinn7640

3 жыл бұрын

@@TheDaltonius ,ZZD

Т-54/55 were not produced in 1943. T-44 was.

@passenger8705

5 жыл бұрын

No it was not.

@passenger8705

5 жыл бұрын

As much As I know the the production began in 47, but I maybe wrong. if you have otger info please share.

@billytheshoebill5364

3 жыл бұрын

1 year later Me: if there's already a T-44 that already been build at World War 2 then what is the use of T-34 series tank

Thomas The *Tank* Engine is the most powerful tank.

@Mlgtrek334

5 жыл бұрын

i subbed to you

@lmao6769_

5 жыл бұрын

Dank*

@magicdonut7125

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, he has a secret turret in his smoke stack

@_aragornyesyes_7171

5 жыл бұрын

No it’s the Bob simple tank is the stronkest

@Dunkskins

5 жыл бұрын

This comment has won the internet today.

Nothing about leopard 2?!?

@hannes2211

5 жыл бұрын

Or the merkava IV!, when even haivng it in the intro as the tank in the background

@TomSawyer1010

5 жыл бұрын

The german made leopard 2a4 and, now in use, leopard 2a6 tanks are pretty good. They have been used against the taliban in afghanistan multiple times.

@jackm7405

5 жыл бұрын

Came here to say this. I would argue the Leopard 2 is the best tank in the world. Absolute beast

@butterybutterman7364

5 жыл бұрын

Seriously, the Leopard can Rival the Abrams. Why wasn't it mentioned?

@marajade2932

5 жыл бұрын

American propaganda._.

Is it bad that I love the fact each time they animate a tank firing, the flames briefly form a skull? It looks too dead on to not be intentional.

THE WORLDS BIGEST GUN IS A 183 MM AT FV4005

@bigfloppa6328

4 жыл бұрын

Viljar R. Nilsen Have you heard of a sturmtiger that is 380mm

@ClementineFlFlFl

4 жыл бұрын

@@bigfloppa6328 Have you heard of Karl-Gerat? 600mm mortar

@bigfloppa6328

4 жыл бұрын

Miria_No6 well he said FV4005 I thought he was meaning vehicles but yes I have and it was impressive

@scharlesscalvin

3 жыл бұрын

(laughs in 800 mm gun on p 1500)

4:20 I gotta stop you right there. The largest cannon on tank was 183mm on FV4005. The 125mm is not the largest even between MBT classed tanks because MBT-70/KPZ-70 had 152mm cannons

@martindebeja4656

5 жыл бұрын

And that is just on usual tanks, several military expert agreed that some artillerie pieces are tank, with 155, 167, 180, 240 and 280mm canons.

@PotPam

5 жыл бұрын

@@martindebeja4656 what about the 130mm cannon on the Is 7

@harrybraddon1865

5 жыл бұрын

If the FV4005 fired its gun while the turret was facing sidways the force created would flip it on its side. Also it was a centurion hull with a fricken barn on top.

@wizzy5202

5 жыл бұрын

i know it's not really a tank but The 2A3 Kondensator 2P :D

@vintzvi3406

5 жыл бұрын

Aurimas Knieža 2B1 Oka has 420mm but only fits the topic of biggest gun on tracks and not tanks

Not one word about the Leopard 2? Like wtf?

@Drache191200

5 жыл бұрын

He is an Over Biased American Shitlord, thats why

@DerMetzFetz

5 жыл бұрын

@@Drache191200 scheint so

@sirdukeofyork8839

5 жыл бұрын

Found the Wehraboo

@CrazyNikel

5 жыл бұрын

Considering its recent performance with Turkey. *Its better to be ignored.*

@DerMetzFetz

5 жыл бұрын

@@CrazyNikel they only have an old generation leopard 2

Zimmerit was also used against stickies, not just magnets. There was also a "Monster" tank Germany wanted to make called the Ratte.

Fv101 scorpion 51 mph... Laughs in M18 hellcat

@joshualee1827

5 жыл бұрын

laughs in italian lunchbox

@bru_5741

4 жыл бұрын

Laughs in M1 Chrysler

@TheTerraPyro

3 жыл бұрын

"The M18 Hellcat was an American tank destroyer of World War II," sorry to ruin your day but m18 isn't a tank. Its a tank destroyer. Lighter class vehicle with specific design to be fast and hunt for enemy tanks. :)

7:39 Many soldiers did this before Korea...

@nicolass3195

5 жыл бұрын

dude what’re you talking about

@golfbauer

5 жыл бұрын

I think the Finish people deserve to be mentioned in that part.

@Zenovarse

5 жыл бұрын

Sticky bombs, motolov and steel bars don't exactly count

You are definitely not the geeks of Tanks Infographisc show. The Biggest Gun Build on a tank was the FV4005 183mm Cannon. That was made by the British. And not the Russian 125mm.

@MihaelTurina

5 жыл бұрын

Maybe he meant it was the biggest gun on a modern tank but I agree.

@vintzvi3406

5 жыл бұрын

2B1 oka biggest gun on tracks

@vintzvi3406

5 жыл бұрын

Madam Meouff Why i said it was biggest gun on tracks

@braith117

5 жыл бұрын

Germany has designed and tested a 130mm gun for the Leopard, I believe.

@Luziferratus

5 жыл бұрын

Kw- 2 152mm gun, Jagdtiger 128mm, Maus 128mm. I wonder why no leopard 2 is coming in here. The Abrams is coming from the MBT Projekt 70 to Like the Baguette. The tiger model used in this info graphic but for a tiger often a vk3606? Dudes...

*Sees thumbnail, reads title* Welp, time to see what trash we're taking out today

8:16 It was actually a KV-2 for various reasons: the main, and most important one, the fact that 6 crew members were buried. KV-1 tanks only had 5 sits. Another one is that KV-2s, with their 152 mm main cannon, usually operated alone, instead than in groups like KV-1s and other tanks did.

Fact n°35 : Russian T-54 and T-55 tanks are not from 1943... Those are post-war designs...

@gabrielb5387

5 жыл бұрын

they actually aren’t - they were developed during the war. He got them wrong anyway, both have can have both guns.

@Karagianis

4 жыл бұрын

Well the T-54/55 is based off of the T-44 hull which was actually developed then. The iconic dome turret however was a post war development.

Well, you partly got it wrong on one fact. Tanks are road legal in the USA, and anyone can own and operate a "military tank" under two stipulations: the cannon must be deweaponized, and the steel tracks must be replaced with rubber.

@tea4223

5 жыл бұрын

Christopher Rhodes... What about turn signals, brake lights, tag light, head lights with dimmers, rear view mirrors, license tag, inspection sticker, etc.?

@pepijnlams4262

5 жыл бұрын

And here i am lining in the netherlands, where even having a pocket knife is only allowed under strict rules. Yet in america if you want to take a slightly modified tank to the highway you can do so.

@pepijnlams4262

5 жыл бұрын

Living, not lining of course.

@darylfoster7886

5 жыл бұрын

Bull shit the tanks are waaayyyy over DOT weight limit lol

@Crankiebox99

5 жыл бұрын

You can shoot the M4A3E8 but you have to be watched by FBI

4:19 i dont really understand this one, because i know for a fact that the russian kv-2 had a 152mm cannon. and there are probably tanks out there with even bigger cannons. he also didnt specify wether it was the biggest cannon on tanks. because battleships could have calibers up to 406mm. and the carl gustaf railway artillery cannon had a caliber of 800mm

(50 insane lies that you dident know)

8:12 Thats a t-34 not a kv-1... At 10:27 The tiger was Tiger 131 not 223.. 11:49 I dont think Object 269 exist, you mean the object 279. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT!! PLEASE!

@gerrylieianorigeneza3979

5 жыл бұрын

Yes and You spelled Tiger wrong and also at 11:49 it used a T-54 turret, AND at 12:19 you forgot about the P1000 Ratte or Rat

@spacemonkey037

5 жыл бұрын

@@gerrylieianorigeneza3979 I can see that it uses a t54 turret, but it is still no obj. 269..

@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385

5 жыл бұрын

obj 2 6ix 9ine Lmao

@adrianneflors.genetiano425

5 жыл бұрын

hmm in some accounts its called as OBJ 270 or also OBJ 269

@qwartz1586

5 жыл бұрын

Actually Object 269 did exist... Just never mentioned and had never been known world wide as it was lost to prototypes of the Object 279

8:11 *Says KV-1* *Shows T-34* *is actually KV-2* Start researching facts instead of putting down what you first see.j

@bagas_akbar

5 жыл бұрын

And the tank who hold the entire German division is KV-2 tank, not KV-1 tank

@hanzarco7445

5 жыл бұрын

IamYour Nemesis Germans threw grenades on the KV-2 succesfuly after 24 HRS of battling the KV-2 with atry and other tanks...

@punonn6792

5 жыл бұрын

also the Vk 36.01 H did not enter battle

@hanzarco7445

5 жыл бұрын

Pun Onn Yeah exactly

@Mage-zs2ow

5 жыл бұрын

@@punonn6792 yes, they were prototypes

fact number 27 is so wronng the leopard 2a6 or 2a7 is by far the most well defended tank in the world right nonw

@--X--

5 жыл бұрын

The T90M and MS Tagil (and T-14 Armata) actually have the best defense among all modern MBTs, with the A7+ being alongside them.

@ducminhtran4136

4 жыл бұрын

@@--X-- That's the disputing one

The Leopard 2A6 is considered the best allrounder tank.

@--X--

5 жыл бұрын

Surely, but after the T90M

@saltboat5091

3 жыл бұрын

I personally think the M1A2 Abrams is a sweet deal

@11Tits

3 жыл бұрын

@@saltboat5091 nah I would rather take the 2a7

Imagine the infographics show in youtube rewind.....

@TheInfographicsShow

5 жыл бұрын

lol.

@bayareajokester9456

5 жыл бұрын

I shouldn't have to imagine. Infographics along with many other content creators have long earned a spot on KZread rewind but KZread shilled to corporate industries. Like Cardi B? Really? She's not even a F ing youtuber.

@XxDAOGJAYYxX

5 жыл бұрын

Pewds

@dickmeatbootysack2165

5 жыл бұрын

Ala Harrabi the other channel was, the one with blocko. I can’t think of the name now. Edit: it’s life noggin

@dickmeatbootysack2165

5 жыл бұрын

Abyssinia Empire KZread rewind has youtubers. Anyone who posts videos is technically a youtuber. So cardi b is, she’s just an artist

INSANE TANK FACT: 2.0 br tanks can kill 10.0 br tanks

@divinesan7786

5 жыл бұрын

***Mingot Army*** yep

@manwithaplan27jp37

5 жыл бұрын

I see your a man of culture. I love also meme thunder as always.

@maticsega3311

5 жыл бұрын

Attack the D point!

@francocestari8580

5 жыл бұрын

Sturmpanzer boi

@coledavis5212

5 жыл бұрын

*tHëRêS å HøLé Îñ YõÛr RíGhT wÌnG*

The line about the man blocking the tank was pulled right off of wiki

why is the Maus not included?

No Bob semple tank No like. The bob semple tank is far superior than the challenger 2 or m1a2. @infographicshow stop posting this unscientific nonsense.

@rugged2050

5 жыл бұрын

Bob semple tank best tank.

@aydankhaliq2967

5 жыл бұрын

It was said by the chosen one who goes by the name of simple history

@romanfesas9721

5 жыл бұрын

its pronounced jesus not bob semple omg

@marajade2932

5 жыл бұрын

Capitalist American pigdogs with their propaganda my Tsar._.

@swedishmeatballs7818

5 жыл бұрын

The Big Bob

stop doing history/war videos because you make it very bad

@joseignaciohileradorna5122

5 жыл бұрын

Ikr

@aydankhaliq2967

5 жыл бұрын

Halo mein feldmarschall, good to know your healthy

@ajko5494

5 жыл бұрын

They always bias the american stuff

@nickbusch1454

5 жыл бұрын

This is so biased

@Hunter-bm6ss

5 жыл бұрын

that's every list channel i watch these to face palm

it wasn't called the monster. It was called the "RATTE".

@ichabodcro6508

5 жыл бұрын

when we talk about cannons, how about German railroad cannon GUSTAV

@potatosalad1093

5 жыл бұрын

And Karl

@4F6D

4 жыл бұрын

Ichabod CRO big berta, Gustav Are love

Well, Id consider myself fairly seasoned in terms of military and tank history, but was pleasantly surprised to learn a couple facts I havent heard about yet. Nice video despite some of the inaccuracies.

Nothing shocks me more than a lightning bolt.

@theaussie6526

5 жыл бұрын

Or me slapping you with the net force of God

@DejaLuMusic

5 жыл бұрын

Ohm my god you're right

@firerodan2965

5 жыл бұрын

Lol nice joke

@dusty4102

5 жыл бұрын

You better amp up the V’s on your puns. I’ll finish this off with the electric boogaloo ‘cause I’m bored.

@citaderu9323

5 жыл бұрын

Well do you know what bursts my bubble? Needles

[ 6:26 ] The text reads out M1A2. While The narrator says M1A1. :/

@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385

5 жыл бұрын

he can't read (dyslexia?)

@swedishmeatballs7818

5 жыл бұрын

HMMMMM.......

“Tanks are the ultimate weapon” Nuclear weapons: AM I A JOKE TO YOU?!

"Tanks are the ultimate weapon!" Navy: Laughing hysterically

@messinberver4683

5 жыл бұрын

The Death Star: *laughs till it blows up*

@Kevin_Lin603

3 жыл бұрын

air-force:..........

@JokerLokison

3 жыл бұрын

Said the squid on ManAss Monday...

Says a russian KV-1 holds off an entire german division, yet it shows a T-34 (57mm or short barreled 76mm?) vs some German Vk 3601

@shep7544

5 жыл бұрын

cliner kyle perez Yeah. And it was a KV-2 that held of the panzer division, not the KV-1

@OchaFauzan01

5 жыл бұрын

It should be KV-2

@elt39

5 жыл бұрын

Dallas got his medic bag it was not a kv 2 he was talking about krovslavski or What the hell his name was, he took out like 20 or something like that german tanks in a KV 1, there has never been a incidenten with a KV 2 in that way. Tho, he never fought any VK. 36.01 as they never left paper

@michelangelangelo7091

5 жыл бұрын

cliner kyle perez *tzé tzé tzé* Typical Infographics show military facts, always wrong

@michelangelangelo7091

5 жыл бұрын

cliner kyle perez also no, it's a 57

The high mm of a gun dosent mean it is better.

@michelangelangelo7091

5 жыл бұрын

Birkusmaximus Spiller British 57mm QF MK.7 was better than American 75mm M3, and both were short barrel guns

@TheLtVoss

5 жыл бұрын

Well in smoothbore cannons a bigger caliber means u cann accelerate the (same) projectile stronger at the same barrel length more Vmax means more punch so bigger is better for that but a bigger gun means more recoil and less ammunition and 120mm upward they need a automatic loading mechanism all of that makes the tank more expensive

@combativeThinker

5 жыл бұрын

The ammunition is what really matters.

@jingledfriskies5048

5 жыл бұрын

Panther > Kv2.

@naggie6358

5 жыл бұрын

High calibre short guns are better infantry support, smaller calibre long guns are better for anti tank.

THIS CHANNEL IS AMAZING!!!! I'm obsessed!

the t28 superheavy is actually known as the t95, and the obj 269 is actually obj 279.

@biostar1278

5 жыл бұрын

It's still a T28/T95 Super Heavy Tank

@ethancotton1549

5 жыл бұрын

@@biostar1278 yeah, but it's proper name is the T95.

@Maxwell_Twist

5 жыл бұрын

@@ethancotton1549 From what I've been able to find, the tank was only officially called the gun motor carriage T95 for about a year before being renamed the super heavy tank T28. There is some mention of some OCMs, but I couldn't find out what that stands for in this case.

@ethancotton1549

5 жыл бұрын

Pencil Twist yeah, or the more simplified t95. Also I think you mean gmc or even GC which are gun motor carriges or gun carrier such as the churchill GC.

@fryyedlemmon7467

5 жыл бұрын

Actually the T28 super heavy tank was a dumbed down version of the T95. The T95 had a total of 4 tracks and angled side armor while the T28 had only 3 tracks and flat faced side armor and don’t quote me of this but I think the T95 had a 105mm gun while the T28 has a 90mm, again I’m not sure about the gun size

4:21 "largest cannon in the world" 125mm

@alamoemperor3845

5 жыл бұрын

Maybe largest in service on an mbt? Tho i think theres some leos with 130mms

@83athom

5 жыл бұрын

@@alamoemperor3845 The Abrams and Leopard 2 both had variants in testing equipped with a long barreled 140mm gun that fired projectiles several times larger at much greater speeds than the current 120mm both use. Plus if we're going by caliber, the KV-2 during WWII was equipped with a 152mm howitzer. Oh, and that's sort of ignoring the Centurion modification (Fv4005) that gave it a 183mm naval gun.

@samobispo1527

5 жыл бұрын

M551 Sheridan and M-60a2 "Starship" has 152mm cannon/missile launchers.

@fernandosonato8022

5 жыл бұрын

Gustav is best gun

they also use the wrong picture for the p1500 Monster the picture they did use is the p1000 Ratte

@vintzvi3406

5 жыл бұрын

P1500 is also a SPG and not a tank, basically they meant P-1000 ratte and not P-1500 monster

50 "insane facts" without the biggest tank the Maus.

@arnaudn.5675

5 жыл бұрын

My thoughts exactly

@ichabodcro6508

5 жыл бұрын

and what is wrong with ISRAELI MERKAVA, he always displays US vs Russia, what about German new tanks, it is just USA have the best *no they dont*.............He said that Abrams M1A2 has never been destroyed, not one........big bull

Few fun facts: On average it took about 4 shermans to take out one tiger. Germany planned 2 super tanks, The Maus and E100, the two designs competed to be chosen among hitler. The maus failed and the E100 was chosen, never fully assembled but the hull and turret were made for one. Also germany late on planned the E series by unifying parts across tanks making repair and upgrades simple but it was too late as they were being starved of resources. Alot of panther and tiger tanks took far too long to repair because of the immense complexity of the engines and transmission

Talks about KV-1, shows a T-34. The Division attacking looks like the Porsche Tiger design, which was later made into the Elefant. Did you guys really look into it?

@deleteyrself1

5 жыл бұрын

Also the so called kv 1 was actually a kv 2

@hamstergaming1792

5 жыл бұрын

the division attacking are vk36.01 prototypes i believe. and deleteyrself1 is correct. it was a kv2. the hero of raseiniai

@qwas_1234_

5 жыл бұрын

its a t-34-57

As much as I thoroughly enjoy the rest of the channel, Please, just stop with the military vids, especially with tanks...that didnt even look anything like the challenger 2! It looks like a bloody leopard 1 prototype! The landkreuzer you showed was the p.1000 ratte .Oh, and lets not forget to mention the extreme bias... US this! US that! Half of your Abrams facts are wrong anyway- yes, it's up there with some of the best tanks, but you glorify it wayyyyy too much.There's more to the world than the USA. This is why these military vids you do are pretty boring. Other than military vids I enjoy the channel quite a lot :)

@michelangelangelo7091

5 жыл бұрын

ollie 1012 have you seen his 50 jet fighters facts? Most on them are on the F35, like 55% of the facts

@a39tortoise40

5 жыл бұрын

yep it's pretty sad

@simonmaala7311

5 жыл бұрын

@@a39tortoise40 Yeah ur right.... Germans and Russians were the real masters of Armoured combat mot the slimey tea sucking brits and the fat muricans... I mean.. Srsly... Boi ..the Bias

@a39tortoise40

5 жыл бұрын

@@simonmaala7311 get rid of the slimey tea sucking brits bit and ill respect ur opinion XD

@raidzor5452

5 жыл бұрын

ikr....The Abrams literally gets outclassed by any modern tank in mobility and armor... not to speak about the composite armor leaving open spots of literally sheet metal and the technology innovation being from the '80s, meanwhile other tanks have advance computer-controlled anti missile systems, ceramic composites, unmanned turrets and much more powerful and efficient engines (because Americans still use that gas turbine thing which gets outclassed by modern diesel engines in power (1500hp for russian tanks and 1200 for the Abrams), efficiency (a jet engine consumes more than any other engine in high torque applications), stealth (it emits double the heat, which allows for easy IR missile targeting, and makes an incredible amount of noise even at idle), not to speak about the throttle response being awful and the servicing being expensive and time consuming, as well as reliability) Anyway, it's good... but really just absolutely not the best nor even impressive.... Maybe just the ammunition is really good but that isn't even mentioned...

8:12 the crew ran away and survived. Not even gonna mention the tank part cause that's a dead horse at this point

The one made by the Syria 🇸🇾 rebalsó is my cup of tea. Come on PlayStation controller

Didn't mention the fake tanks in ww1 guys

@aydankhaliq2967

5 жыл бұрын

Like the meme m10 panther

@kingtigerthomas318-69

5 жыл бұрын

U meant the Balloon tanks

@tigertank3024

5 жыл бұрын

Or that the biggest tank battle ever was the Battle of Prokhorovka ( part of the battle of Kursk)

@tigertank3024

5 жыл бұрын

And they say that the t-54 is first produced in 1943 it’s 1947

@omfgspoon7

5 жыл бұрын

@@tigertank3024so it was the battle of kursk then idiot

Kursk was not the biggest tank battle. The battle of Brody was

@stalinium4769

5 жыл бұрын

Luka Skytte finally someone who knows

@dmitrit.4862

5 жыл бұрын

You should compare the numbers and then say which battle was bigger? There were over 5,000 Soviet tanks and almost 3,000 german tanks in use during Operation Citadel. Then the Soviet counter offensive came, with over 7300 soviet tanks against over 3,200 german tanks. And I didn’t even count the men, guns & mortars or aircraft in. The battle of Brody was more like 3,500 Soviet tanks vs 750 german tanks.

@stalinium4769

5 жыл бұрын

Dmitri T. Source ?

@Marvin-fw2bn

5 жыл бұрын

That's still subject to much debate. But it mostly comes down to how big you define "battle". So in which area and in which time frame which engagements are attributed to the battle.

@cunuchc6153

5 жыл бұрын

The battle of Kursk is bigger by numbers, front tensions, results and military-political consequences.

11:46 1.*Object 279 2. I wish that tank wasnt Even invented because it brought so much pain to me and other WoT players

Tanks for making this informative video

8:21 Ok wtf.First of all that’s a T34 variant not a Kv-1 Second of all a Kv-2 was the one who stalled out the Germans

@ariqamsyarazizulazmi5091

5 жыл бұрын

Actually, people doesnt know what KV it is. But I think its a KV1 tank because KV2s arent made to destroy tanks. It was made to destroy enemy fortifications. Plus, KV2s are too weak as it has lack of rate of fire.

@zjotheglorious

5 жыл бұрын

@@ariqamsyarazizulazmi5091 Aaaand another WoT player. Any tank can have a good rate of fire. You just need a strong loader.

@acceleratergun7597

5 жыл бұрын

@@zjotheglorious Nothing has a good rate of fire if it has a 152mm gun. The weight of the shell and the constraints of operating in a turret see to that. A KV-1 is much more likely, and the commander of the German force there identified it as such.

@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385

5 жыл бұрын

low budget editing there chief

@zakkyun

5 жыл бұрын

uwu it’s you

You said kv1 and drew a t34 but the battle of raissenai was a kv2

I like how you made the muzzle fire of the tanks skulls.

another fun tank fact: apparently the turret of the KV2 was so heavy that the turretring could only support movement when the tank was level. also, when the tank would list to one side the turret would have a tendency to turn that way autoamtically due to the immense weight. many KV2s tipped over because of that

Video hasn’t started but I already know I’m about to get triggered

@CrazyNikel

5 жыл бұрын

Good get triggered you 3rd world rug kisser. You jealous haters just *fuel and secure US dominance* thanks for the help 😉😂

@essentialjazzforaspiringmu1605

5 жыл бұрын

Lol what is that even supposed to mean. Hes saying that because its going to have a shit ton of stuff wrong.

@brentonherbert7775

5 жыл бұрын

@@CrazyNikel Idiot...

@sirbillyblacksmith4393

5 жыл бұрын

@@CrazyNikel HOLD UP...

@--X--

5 жыл бұрын

Seems heavily US biased

Where in the high hell did he get "23,000" tanks participating in the Battle of Kursk from?! The highest speculated number I've seen anywhere before is between six and eight thousand, which is a far cry from that immensely hyperbolic claim in this video. Another note, as it seems very little in-depth research was performed for several key portions of this video, the so-called Polish PL-01 never was a legitimate attempt at a new advanced tank. It was a mockup built on the chassis of a T-55A in Polish service several years ago. And lastly, the Challenger 2 incorporates the usage of the Dorchester model armor scheme, which is improved derivative of the Chobham armor originally designed and incorporated in the M1 Abrams and Challenger 1 back in the 1980s.

@simonhofrichter2551

5 жыл бұрын

With those 23.000 tanks they probably inclued SPG and SPAA's aswell

@koskok2965

5 жыл бұрын

Chobham armor is an umbrella term used to refer to the well known british composite armor packages "Burlington" and "Dorchester". Dorchester IS Chobham, 2nd Gen Chobham to be exact.

@coledavis5212

5 жыл бұрын

23000 tanks is way too unlikely. The Russian and German economies weren't made for mass production

@mitasrb

5 жыл бұрын

That's because ZERO research has been done.

@Mage-zs2ow

5 жыл бұрын

@@simonhofrichter2551 and maybe everything else that has a track

I really liked those little skull shapes in the muzzle flashes :D

Your channel is getting more and more unenjoyable

The T-90 has the biggest gun? How 'bout the shitbarn with the 183mm i mean ofc the FV4005

@divinesan7786

5 жыл бұрын

Tou Fou I think they mean modern MBT?

@Mike_Fin

5 жыл бұрын

@@divinesan7786 "equipped with the largest cannon in the world" I doubt that

@divinesan7786

5 жыл бұрын

Mike_Fin well for all MBT, Russian has 125mm while others use 120mm Rheinmentall

@manwithaplan27jp37

5 жыл бұрын

@@divinesan7786 but there was no mention of mbt when he said the biggest gun.

@manwithaplan27jp37

5 жыл бұрын

largest gun known so far is the German railway artillery gun. But for a tank to my knowledge is a 183mm naval gun aka fv4500 aka battle barn

Although the t14 has a 125mm gun many previous tanks have had larger guns, even if you include the 152mm upgrade

@Combatwombat-sn7ng

5 жыл бұрын

@@zykom1 I know- like the KV-2 or centurion avre (not ww2)

@packee8052

5 жыл бұрын

Bigger dose not mean better.

@isni1946

5 жыл бұрын

These are not anti-tanks cannons, the are howitzers (to destroy bunkers)

@Combatwombat-sn7ng

5 жыл бұрын

@@isni1946 KV 2 was anti tank

@kubauhlir1730

5 жыл бұрын

@@zykom1 Yeah, that's bullshit and doesn't make sense at all... Only larger guns used during and after WW2 were howitzers... Also it is bullshit, because the guns were very accurate even back then, sporting higher than 90% 1st shot kill rate

wow shocking, this video drove me insane. pls don't exaggerate with the titles

Tank you its a really good video

says female tanks have machine guns, shows two of the same tanks but one with 2 cannons on the side. also you can't say Kursk for Germany and show vk 36.01 h tanks, they're freaking prototypes, do your god damn research and don't use the first google search that comes up

@tcfyvgjhbj

5 жыл бұрын

Pickled Pickles the vk3601h was not shown it was a tiger with its “stock”/ prototype turret

@harryzhao727

5 жыл бұрын

it's not a tiger, look and the hull, you'll see a break in the track protection above the track towards the front, tigers didn't have that, along with the fact that it's not in a box shape, plus box towards the box of the tank, and lastly, it's not in the tiger's box tank form and it doesn't have the engine protection on the back of the tank @@tcfyvgjhbj

@MAG_1204

5 жыл бұрын

Typical wot player

@MAG_1204

5 жыл бұрын

@@tcfyvgjhbj umm, you're wrong, the vk 36.01 h turret only designed for vk 36.01 h Since it was meant to only used by VK 36.01 (H), Which is Tiger I's prototype.

@michelangelangelo7091

5 жыл бұрын

Pickled Pickles those aren't even VK3601, they are VK36.01 chassis with a Panzer VII Löwe (just a design, never made any prototype), which makes it even less accurate

"No abrams were destroyed by the ennemy fire to this day" (me looking up) "Seinfield song is playing hard".

@Schnittertm1

5 жыл бұрын

Yes, the US is rather famous for killing their own tanks, they don't need outclassed enemies that can't hurt their tanks to do that. ;)

@imperialwhovian3461

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah anyone who claims this is just lying, the Abrams is a great tank but any tank can fairly easily be knocked out even if it’s just for a short time, even if the crew survives with a few million dollars of equipment heavily damaged I’d be surprised if not some attempt is made to retrieve and at least salvage.

@alexschenewerk7436

5 жыл бұрын

Tanks are tanks man. Any one of them can be neutralized. Especially with the US and NATOs compliment of CAS and multirole aircraft, like the a10 and others that would make quick work of any tank.

@--X--

5 жыл бұрын

That RPG7 would like a word

@miguelb.655

5 жыл бұрын

Tanks can be destroyed Isis and Iraqi rebels have destroyed scores of Iraqi Goverment M1A1. The same in Yemen. Also a IED can be considered enemy fire so a lot of US M1 Abrahams have been destroyed in Iraq War.

“The tank is the best weapon on the battlefield” Airforces around the world: Lol

0:58 the world 1st functioning tank is Little Willie. A prototype proven it is possible to design and build a functioning big heavy war machine with armours, guns, siege weapons, and troop support. 1 was built with full of mistakes. Be keeping this short and go search it yourself. It gave birth to every tank because of its existence.

7:22 I've heard the m18 hellcat was able to get up to anywhere between 55 to 60 miles an hour

@merle1476

5 жыл бұрын

Josef Stalin Yh sure it could 55 kmh that’s about it

@Schnittertm1

5 жыл бұрын

Turn off the governors on modern MBT and they could also go much faster. The only problem would be that after a short while their suspension and tracks would be shot if you do that.

@TaipansSpicyHighlights

5 жыл бұрын

The tank A-20 from Russia can get up to 80 km/h.

@bordercollie6593

5 жыл бұрын

Apparently the new wheeled light tanks can go at 100kmh

@josefstalin9678

5 жыл бұрын

@@bordercollie6593 World of Tanks?

No way..again...video sponsored by the U.S. army

@simonmaala7311

5 жыл бұрын

@ AMERICAN BIAS!!!

@sentinelwinters6584

5 жыл бұрын

Well it is true that no american M1A2s have ever been destroyed but its definately not the most advanced tank anymore, now that title belongs to the T-14

@sentinelwinters6584

5 жыл бұрын

​@ Those are not M1A2s, they are other variants

@FOX0NE

5 жыл бұрын

American bias all I can say and there is proof that the tanks in the Iraq army were T-72 M, they were under armoured and didn't have the same amunition as a normal T-72 and I bet that a Russian T-72 can take an American tank any day

@Sarfanger

5 жыл бұрын

@@sentinelwinters6584 Saudi M1A2s has been lost to Houthi fighters.

There's misinformation in this video. At 8:15 you say that a KV1 stopped the panzer division alone.However, it was a KV2,equipped with a 152mm howitzer.After the tank was taken down,the famous tank came to be known as the KV2 of Rasenai(the place where the battle occurred).

Number 36.. The Battle of Golan Heights that just goes to show how strategic factor and placements and knowledge of use can make a huge huge huge huge huge difference

I am saddened that you did not include the German Panzer VIII Maus. This thing was a beast, weighing nearly 200 metric tons. The thinnest section of armor was the rear of the hull at 150 mm (5.9 in), and the thickest the front of the turret at 220 mm (8.66 in). They had working prototypes in 1944, but ultimately scrapped it.

*WARGAMING WANT TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*

@mtf_nine_tailed_fox385

5 жыл бұрын

*FIAT 3000 WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION*

@rishavoo7

5 жыл бұрын

FV 4005 STAGE II WANTS TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION

@luckyplayer5305

5 жыл бұрын

T92 HMC wants to know your location

@anaverageweeb1582

5 жыл бұрын

STURMTIGER WANT'S TO KNOW YOUR LOCATION

@ikea_man

5 жыл бұрын

@@rishavoo7 *DEATH STAR WOULD LIKE TO HESH YOU*

You should do a video on 50 insane facts about the military Humvee

Tanks during ww2 did have over 125mm cannons but shot more like a howitzer, and were commonly converted into artillery

Where the German super tank from ww2 name the mauss? Although it was not used during combat they do have prototype during the war

@aydankhaliq2967

5 жыл бұрын

Unlike the monster

@dandrelowery3714

5 жыл бұрын

Sent to museum I guess. Since it’s proven like the Monster too heavy to carry on rails. Good concept but limited resources

@dtk9257

5 жыл бұрын

what happened to the P1000 "Ratte" huh?

@TotoGeenen

5 жыл бұрын

@@dtk9257 it only excisted on blueprints

@ameya5819

5 жыл бұрын

Maus tank was captured by Russia after they found out about its existence.... It is in a museum in Russia.

No Bob Semple Tank? BOOOO

I have seen one of the few b17s in working order in person. Also at 5km there is no way that it was direct fire, it was being used like a self propelled artillery, most main battle tanks can also serve as artillery, that is the main reason they often carry he shells. Also if you count self propelled artillery they have 155mm howitzers on modified tank chassis

12:25 Calls it P1500 Monster It's actually called Landkreuzer P1000 Ratte (Landcruiser P1000 the Rat)

Wow i’m sooo shocked about all these amazingly well researched facts.... eh what did i expect... i give a solid 4,5/10

@michelangelangelo7091

5 жыл бұрын

Flyguy779 10/10 would fact again (this is sarcasm)

33:the kv-2 have a fckin 152mm derp gun :P

@masen3319

5 жыл бұрын

And another thing: in 8:25 has a T-34 not a kv-1!

@mrwhips2435

5 жыл бұрын

The fv-4005 had a even bigger gun at 183mm

@dleljak100

5 жыл бұрын

Mastryx you called?

@thevigamerpixerlator

5 жыл бұрын

@@mrwhips2435 important to note its called the version 2 for a reason. Because the 1st version was a different prototype

@heroninja1125

5 жыл бұрын

t92 hmc has a 240mm gun schwerer gustav railway cannon has a 600mm cannon

My favorite tank of WW2 is the T26E4 Super Pershing. It was a upgraded version of the M26 Pershing. The T26E4 had a 90mm cannon that could shot shells through 205mm thick armor. Only one was made during WW2. And it was successful because from what I saw in a documentary, When the Americans where invading the city of Desile (I think I spelled the name right) The T26E4 successfully destroyed a Tiger 2 and Panzer 4.