I agree with all these points. Also my biggest gripe, specialists, they need to go and bring back proper classes

@3DiFilms

11 ай бұрын

agreed, how they gonna make both teams look the same other than a light on your body

@rayyone1

11 ай бұрын

​@@3DiFilmsRight, the most stupid design idea ever 😂

@zerg6001

11 ай бұрын

Same I don’t want garbage specialists

@jasonk9968

11 ай бұрын

i really dont like the specialists at all shit sucks

@ibrahimssen

11 ай бұрын

Yes, they have no place in Battlefield

It must be tough being a bf youtuber in these times....

@NateT092

11 ай бұрын

You don't say....

@reconax

11 ай бұрын

I mean they made AKA-ART quit lmao. Dude would post non-stop until 2042 disaster

@DJParkesie959II

11 ай бұрын

Unless you're Westie or Jackfrags and are willing to suck a mile of Dice/EA d..k

@rainerzufall9881

11 ай бұрын

@@ashketchum3441 indeed, I think the best times for this franchise have long gone. I have no faith any more in them creating a good Battlefield game. They failed twice in a row now and proved that they have learned little to nothing.

@toucansam8164

11 ай бұрын

Would you care for an egg in these trying times

I believe that a BF3 mortar gadget was a lot more humane than all those portable or vehicle mounted grenade launchers and scatter nades in 2042

@AceWolf2009

11 ай бұрын

God....I miss being able to have mortars. That was always a fun team dynamic. Recob spotting the enemies and the support mortar would start nailing them ' as best as I could anyways ' It was a fun tactic to try and block a route off or delay the attacking squad until more friendlies came to strengthen the point..

@ApolloTheDerg

11 ай бұрын

At least BF3 made you man the mortar, was so irritating in BF4 to have some dude in spawn out of counter battery range.

@octapusxft

11 ай бұрын

@@ApolloTheDerg yeah, there was risk and reward. The firing arc was also big enough in BF3 that it always hot the targeted area regardless of elevation

The Battlefield 3 voicelines were on point. You could hear the panic and stress in the Voice. After running for a while, the soldier would also breathe more heavily. Many small details that i have not been forgotten to this day.

@barx

11 ай бұрын

In battlefield 1, a lot of the voice actors were exercised prior to delivering lines, so they'd give the impression of exhaustion more authentically

@AceWolf2009

11 ай бұрын

I do like the spotting call outs in 2042 though, if anything I think that part they nailed. They give you what it is, where it is and how far away it is.. But the rest of it should be tossed out.

I’m not a fan of your delivery sometimes but this is the BEST most informative video you’ve EVER done. You are spot on 100% with every topic. I would say the only call in vehicles should be ATV and Polaris or Jeep with no guns at all. Awesome video. Keep up the good work.

@BeyondtheIights

11 ай бұрын

When he mimicked the voiceless was funny asf

Another things related to the general aesthetic of the game: Make cool and credible skins for the soldiers. No Santa Claus, no BrokeBack Mountain shit, no Dozer that looks like a wrestler, just soldiers that look like soldiers. For example take inspirations from bundles like Dogs of War, Desert Scorpion or skins like Cirrus (Casper) or the Battle of Nordvik style

@kanedNunable

11 ай бұрын

yup. why not let us customise our uniform and character face more. dont let us have 20 uniforms. i want us to all look like part of an army with slight individualisation, more like real life. keep classes looking unique just so we dont all look exactly the same. shirt untucked/tucked. sleeves rolled up or not etc. not whole other colour uniforms etc.

@tacobandit1926

11 ай бұрын

​@@kanedNunableBF5 I thought did it perfectly

@AceWolf2009

11 ай бұрын

Just take what they did for BFV but tweak it. Most obvious would be, make class specific cosmetics. So only x class can wear certain gear and clothing, etc. So you still have that visual que of what class you are dealing with. Obviously make sure that each faction has their own distinct looks and asthetics to them.. Other then that, BFV I feel had the perfect balance of classic class system but still able to make and sell cosmetics. Though I do wish theirs were more authentic looking but hell, they are 100 times better then hat 2042 offers... Least with a modern setting, the available options for cosmetics and still keeping to prop soldier attire and such should have been way easier to do....but that is assuming they even tried to start with..

@AceWolf2009

11 ай бұрын

​@@kanedNunableI could get behind that but hell look at the U.S. Military. Each branch has their own camo pattern for their uniforms. Personally, I would happily just take American/ally camo patterns and China, Russia/axis camo patterns. As for actual faces, I would love to get a tad more detail then just stock avatar faces. I say they go full on create are soldier route with that. Where you can change the actual faces of the avatar. Gender, hair coloring, eye coloring, skin tone. Heck, even the tone of their voices. After all, they want avatars that people can identify with, so...let us create our own dang soldiers. In doing so opens the door for a whole shit ton of cosmetics. Example, you want to create yourself for a combat engineer class. You have the basic uniform but you can then tweak what type of combat engineer gear the soldier has on their uniform/combat vest. Then you can make what the actual ' human ' look like, even if they are wearing RX glasses or not, etc, etc. I really think that would be the best solution for them to do going further. Not to mention, it would help lesser the feeling of you somewhat being apart of a clone army...lol

@foxbat4155

11 ай бұрын

@@andrewmaclean9810 Microtransaction are a new reality that even Battlefield adapted to. I also like the idea of BF4 adpative camos but this kind of mechanic is, sadly, a memory. So if we are going to have skins I don't want any goofy shit

i think 64v64 was the biggest mistake they ever did, i seriously hope they never do it again.

@KiddBuu_

11 ай бұрын

64v64 can work, they just need to put in the effort towards map design and squad balancing to make it play properly, and they either don’t know how or don’t want to do that.

@aMiyafuji

11 ай бұрын

@@KiddBuu_If they don’t do anything to the servers, then it’ll never work properly. 64v64 created so many server side issues

@xanderabbey8529

11 ай бұрын

I like the idea, they just have to better in terms of map design and getting servers and netcode to handle it. 128 player games are great for racking kills lol.

They also need to avoid adding zero risk things into the game. Lis for example is a zero risk thing because I can damage tanks behind cover from way beyond a tank's effective range. Speaking of effective range, the TOR tank is another great example of a zero risk game mechanic. You basically play the tank by sitting on a hill and mopping the floor with any vehicle in the game. All shots go through APS as well so there isnt any counter play to it

@xanderabbey8529

11 ай бұрын

Mortar and UCAV, and M320HE mains sweating when they hear things like this.

@fishyjoes8159

11 ай бұрын

Lis missile leaves you unreactive while you guide the missile, I wouldn't say zero risk

@messirulz100

11 ай бұрын

@@fishyjoes8159 this would make sense if breakthrough wasnt a thing. Its very easy to camp in spawn with lis behind cover and shut down vehicles from complete safety. Even on CQ if you play at the max range of her missile you're generally pretty safe

@user-mc2no1pu3s

11 ай бұрын

In my region, almost every game have 2 TOR tanks and 2 wildcats camping with APS and shooting any other fking vehicles, thats insane

An important feature for me is destruction. I would like the next bf to improve destruction

@furyiv

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, destruction seemed to have taken a few steps back in this title

@FuriousLittleLatvian

11 ай бұрын

Yeah, but it sucks ass if there are no options to fortify. Leveling everything to the ground w/o build options is a terrible idea. You can see this in some maps where they added destructible buildings. BFV did good, they need to bring back construction.

@mateusc3954

11 ай бұрын

​@@FuriousLittleLatvianMaybe this would not be a problem if they keep or create useful scripted debris after something gets destroyed. And also if some materials were harder than others, and took longer to fall, that would be nice.

@Bert3HD

11 ай бұрын

@@mateusc3954 I agree, more sturdy and compound rather than sinking through the floor after 1 minute.👍🏼😂

@mateusc3954

11 ай бұрын

@@Bert3HD Exactly! 😄

I agree with everything. I would also really like a game that i can play day 1 instead of 18 months later. And even though I've only been playing a few months I'm still bored with the gameplay and lack of good maps. This game makes BF5 look like an award winning game.

I love the T-menu, but everything you said is correct; the game shouldn't let you completely change your weapon to whatever you want for that convenient moment. Its like carrying a closet full of clothes to change into at all times, but for your gun. Makes things way too convenient, especially in cases like the BSV-M, or the Rorsch where the gun can completely change how it works in the span of a reload

2:09, its one of the things why i love BFH so much Most vehicles only got bullet based things and no splash dmg based, same for the gadgets, there's one noobtube, but it isnt that good vs infantry (its anti vehicle) The nades where really strong tho, but fairly long timer 3:18 I like the + system, but it seems more like a weapon balance problem, the gun should not be able to be both a dmr and smg, have 2 guns instead! (Technically BF1 had a system build like it, like with the General LIU that could go SLR and Bolt action) The system can exist, but should be done very differently 4:48 So true, nothing to add. (Its one of the reasons i like BF3's system more than the BF4 one, SMG's for all, but no DMR's or carbines) 5:36, callins maybe for quadbikes and such, things without big guns, also give them a timetolive of like 1 minute before disapearing, so more people can effectively call em in, and you can't camp em) 5:46 Screw AI turret like bs 6:40, theyre cringe, but is it really the worst Expected stuff like crossplay, AI soldiers or the way CQ sectors work tbh, but generally gucci list

@KiddBuu_

11 ай бұрын

I believe all games should have opt-in crossplay, except games like Rainbow where console vs PC is damn near two different games.

Agree on the plus system and the lack of readability in general. Classes should be locked to specific ranges of effectiveness. That's the entire point of classes, being good at a specific role and relying on your team to mitigate your shortcomings.

And if there's a call in menu it should cost squad points like in BFV

There’s a lot of things that they should never do, we’ll see if DICE can finally make another battlefield game that feels like bf3 or bf4.

"Don't be sad. That's just how it works out sometimes" - DICE Sweden

I agree that certain classes should be restricted to certain weapons and that readability is really important bit the plus system is an amazing concept and with some tweaking it can work really well in a bf game

@bihansiceklone

11 ай бұрын

the unfortunate thing about the plus system is that it restricts gun attachments to only 4 slots, for example i really dislike how you cant have underbarrels and lasers at the same time

@ibrahimssen

11 ай бұрын

I think it's not a good concept. You should choose your loadout before deploying and see the consequences of your choice just like in previous BF games.

@eliiswatchingyou7257

11 ай бұрын

@@ibrahimssen yea that’s also a good point

I agree with the call in menu, that has to go. If you look at the old BF games, when certain vehicals spawned depending on who held a location. That made these locations worth fighting over. I think this is one of the things lost to DICE now days. Map design is something they need to work on, angles and cover, spawns and vehicals... All maps need the three stages, open area (Vehical grounds), the midlands (Sniper alleys) & the close quarters. Depending on what kind of a map it is, one of these areas will be larger then the others. There can even be two or three parts of the map with a particular style. Looking at maps like Gulf of Oman as an example. The plus-system is not bad, but it should be limited to scopes and underbarrel, with one extra option. This way you can't go from SMG to Sniper with one weapon. Unlocking scopes, should be unified for all weapons. Then if a special scope is only for a Rifle then you need to get that unlocked, otherwise most scopes will work for all weapons. So unlocking scopes and underbarrel stuff is more a time played overall then with a speciffic weapon. Perhaps depending on wich class you play you get more Reddots then say Scopes. Now days it's "Specialist sunday" everyday. That is not a battlefield to me.

@01iverQueen

11 ай бұрын

What a horrible grammar 😂

@BasecodeDigital

11 ай бұрын

@@01iverQueen Do you know if im a native english speaker? If not be the better one...

@01iverQueen

11 ай бұрын

@@BasecodeDigital I'm also not a native English speaker, but that didn't change a fact that we have schools to learn languages lol

@mateusc3954

11 ай бұрын

​@@01iverQueenFake News

@BasecodeDigital

11 ай бұрын

@@01iverQueen Allrighty then, have fun!

I will alwayslove you're content man, you've helped me laugh and smile on some of my darker days when I wasn't ready for it and really picked me up. Thank you for everything you do.

@EndersFPS

11 ай бұрын

I appreciate that

I usually eat breakfast watching your videos but today I'm full from dinner last night but just know I'd be eating breakfast rn on a normal day!

Ok valid video, but you gotta admit that one scene when a no pat said it's no pantsing time and totally pantsed everyone was pretty cool.

also asymmetrical vehicle support for both side, especially when they have no idea how to balance it.

It's funny, because the only reason the SPH Explosive Launcher is so overpowered is because its a gadget with semi-automatic fire and can fire twice per reload with a relatively fast reload. I remember the Crossbow Launcher from the original Call of Duty Black Ops being pretty balanced because it was a primary weapon (not a gadget), you only had one-shot per reload and if you missed you were basically dead. The Black Ops Crossbow Launcher being implemented into Battlefield might not pan out, though. Historically this kind of thing is a gadget and not a primary weapon in Battlefield, and half the reason it was balanced in Black Ops was because you had to choose not to use an actual gun in order to use it (same with the Ballistic Knife). The Plus system was added to accommodate the huge maps, new vehicle system and increased player count. If they scale down the multiplayer back to 64 players and make the vehicles play more like they did in previous games in terms of customization they could remove the Plus system without detriment. Otherwise, it needs to stay, just avoid certain shit like the BSV-M, which is kind of an exception, if I'm being honest. Even with the Plus system I can reliably expect that most people who are using the M5A3 are most likely going to be using either Close Combat rounds or Standard (Extended) rounds, because no other ammo types are good on that gun. What bothers me more about the Plus system is what it does to the skill gap, because it exacerbates the issues that are caused by progression systems that lock in-game advantages behind a grind. Why do I have to get ~360+ kills on most of my guns in order to make them competitively viable? Battlefield 4 had the same issue, but at least in that game you only needed to get 90 kills in order to make your primary weapons competitive. Battlefield 2042 quadruples that as a bare minimum for most of the game's weapons. The Call-in Tablet is another thing that was added to accommodate the larger scale and versatility of 2042. If they scale down the next game they could remove it no problem. Alternatively, they could just make it so you can't call in tanks or other "combat ground vehicles" on top of skyscrapers or other similar problematic locations. The Call-In Tablet is frankly pretty harmless outside of those select instances that are easily fixed. The Ranger sucks ass, by the way. I've never gotten any kills with it, and it's pretty easy to kill in its current state. In total I've probably died to a Ranger less than twenty times, which is a tiny, insignificant fraction of my thousands of deaths in the game. I get that the Ranger is annoying, but it's not really a big deal. It's been two years and I still don't get this uptight attitude that people have about mercenaries/soldiers having a sense of humor. I've never once found any of Angel's lines to be inauthentic (and I used to main him), though I can't comment on McKay since I don't really play him. Y'all need to let go of that pop culture. The idea that soldiers in the military are completely serious and all business all of the time is a myth. Plenty of soldiers in real life have senses of humor, which in many cases I believe is used to reduce the tension of a situation or the stress of others in that situation. They literally wake each other up with exploding bottles that sound like bombs when they're bored.

@detectiveharris8772

11 ай бұрын

If you want humor then use voice lines similar to Bad Company 2 since that was a series about soldiers having fun not these stupid lines that specialists spew.

@boyishdude1234

11 ай бұрын

@@detectiveharris8772 I don't see why it has to be like Bad Company or BF3 is the thing. McKay I could see being a little bit too much, but I used to main Angel and his various combat lines never bothered me. A lot of the specialists in 2042 that crack jokes are the younger characters, anyway. They're not as grizzled as Irish or Falck, nor are they members of the Black Market like Crawford.

@detectiveharris8772

11 ай бұрын

Also the voicelines do not make sense for the atmosphere presented either. Comparing modern soldiers who fight wars on behalf of rich capitalists for resources and who mainly sit around all day is different from a world affected by climate change that has destabilized most of the world. You just like dumb shit

"OHhhz ma gawddddd I'm hoooooooking". Spot on. Would pay for the Enders V/O McKay pack if I still played 2042.

@EndersFPS

11 ай бұрын

IM HOOKINNNNNNNGGGGGGGGG

Call-In System should be for the Commanders of each team, not every single person lol.

@QuellTheHeresy

11 ай бұрын

Or the squad leaders with a robust squad points system.

All weapons being available for every specialist is indeed a bad thing, killing a bit BF identity. Please go back with the old way

I'll follow you to any game because you're one of the few who tell it like it is. I get wanting to stick with bf tho. took me two years to uninstall 2042

I have been playing battlefield only since battlefield 3 but what I miss the mobility kill and the lack of full self repair on armored vehicles. You HAD to get out to fix the mobility and risk a player on a parachute stealing your tank lol. I also miss the melee from battlefield 1, although the melee from battlefield 4 was cool too! Lastly, I miss suppression and the weapon feel from previous games, I don't think strafing was very effective in the past because guns would shoot all over the place if you tried it. The perk system from battlefield 1 and 4 was cool as heck too.

What would your opinion be if the next battlefield game had a gun customization system similar to the latest MW2? I'm not big on MW2 game-play but I like the idea of being able to customize the aesthetics of a weapon by changing out stocks, barrels, muzzles, etc. For example I could turn an M16A3 into a Vietnam era M16 by changing out the mag size and front barrel. I think that's good if you want to recreate a weapon from a famous movie or video game.

I kinda agree about the plus system, but at the same time it’s encouraged me to actually utilize things like underbarrel grenade launchers or hybrid scopes, which is something I never really did in previous games because I didn’t want to hurt my ADS speed. I wouldn’t mind if they instead revamped the plus system, maybe give each weapon a “gadget wheel” of sorts, where at any time you can choose between 3 or 4 underbarrel options that you customize in the loadout screen. The rest of the attachments should not be changeable during gameplay, only on the deploy screen. That’s my idea anyways, good video Enders, hopefully dice gives us something to talk about soon.

I agree with everything except the plus menu thing. Some things like a 12x sniper scope or armor piercing ammo are very situational. There are moments when I need to engage a vehicle while not being an engineer and there are moments where the enemy I'm sniping at is too close or too far for the equipped scope. Maybe limit the plus menu in some way instead of removing it.

@furyiv

11 ай бұрын

Yeah it should be a more realistic plus menu system, anything you could feasibly do in the real world, not effectively changing the weapon's category on a whim.

@Mokolibi1

11 ай бұрын

Exactly. The plus menu is one of the best things they integrated in battlefield

@TheoriginalBMT

11 ай бұрын

Totally agree on limits on the plus system. I think a weight system would be the most functional. Throw in actual animations for removing and adding on the plus system too.

@detectiveharris8772

11 ай бұрын

Huh its as if Battlefield has always been about trade offs and the onus on the player is to adjust their playstyle depending on the weapon and kit they have. Its not meant to be like COD where you can do everything

The plus system argument is very valid. Id be all for it being scrapped also.

There are certainly things about the Plus System and Call down menu that are interesting. Being able to call down a vehicle instead of having to respawn is nice. But I do agree it should be limited to Transports and or limited with its placement (No deploy zones) The plus system would need a overhaul. Changing barrels, muzzles, ammo types on the fly changes alot about a guns functionality. So they'd have to make the changes minimal, or limit what you can change. But being able to do things mid game instead of needing a Box from the heavens or dying to change a single attachment.. Lets say I am a little spoiled with the system.

Have you thought about talking about how Gundam Evolution is shutting down? I remember you used to like that game a lot.

Nothing like a late Breakfast with Enders:)

Lmao that Mackay sounded a lot like Morty from Rick & Morty 😂

Plus menu should just be used for scopes and maybe grips

Thank you for hanging in there as a battlefield content creator lol 🫡

You forgot the most un-Battlefield aspect of this game, Specialists!

7:07 is funny af 😂

Tbh, the 60mm mortar pods aren't that bad to play against, its nothing compared to the incendiary weapon the gunner seat on tanks in BF4 had access to, frequently blanketing areas with fire at extreme ranges, doing a lot of damage, ontop of having thermal sights which we only just got in 2042. I remember back then playing with a friend as a tank crew duo, between the two of us, we'd net nearly 200 kills on Rush matches, I as the gunner, would frequently hit over 100 kills a game, without ever getting killed. The only vehicle that is genuinely problematic, is the Railgun Tank. I frequently use that thing as an anti air gun, preventing the enemy team from having an airforce at all. I'm shooting down jets, little birds, and all the other helicopters. Weapon stations on vehicles are not really an issue, only one vehicle is really kinda absurd in the specific thing it can do, and its entirely around its main weapon. Now in addition to this, Irish exists. One well played Irish player in the mix of it all, with well positioned shutdown sentinels, effectively removes these weapons from play. They can intercept all the explosives you hate, even the stealth heli's bombs can get shot down by it lol but I get it. At the end of the day, most infantry players want to play aggressive and fast, which you can't do with Irish, the same way Mackay, Sundance, or even Dozer, can do. Yet I think thats the point, that you were supposed to playing as a squad with roles filled out to address issues like this, its just that no one really wants to play as a squad, even when the game forces the setup, let alone play as a team. Many of the problems in 2042, are exacerbated by the unwillingness of others to perform certain roles, play certain characters, and change their playstyles when the conditions are making their preferred playstyle (such as yourself as an infantry player only really desiring gunfights/gunplay) miserable to slog through.

Hear me out, but if we’re going off the BF4 model, restricting weapons to classes doesn’t do much. In BF4 you could already have a carbine, DMR, or shotgun on every class. The only real difference from 2042 being snipers were restricted, as they should be. In the same line of thinking, I feel like the plus system could work in a game that actually has proper recoil and spread to prevent cross-map beaming, a la BF4.

Enders, it's time to deep dive into Battlebit my friend

Agree with all the points including Specialists with there superpowers . BF3 and BF4 were a blueprint that worked. all we need is BF4.5.

C'mon, everybody loved Angel's "don't be sad, that's how it works sometimes"

Call ins with requisition points, like bfv and the new mode.

id love to no longer see some dude going 100-0 in a heli every single match

The only voice line I like is Caspers when the team is losing he tell everyone were loosing coordinate, focus

Plus menu is good to change the scope so if just that is still there, they can get rid of everything else on it

@Nitroh-

11 ай бұрын

Yeah I think it's fine for sights and maybe grips and barrels but ammo types that completely change the type of weapon and its use potential needs to go

@Womtek1

11 ай бұрын

@@Nitroh- Yeah Agreed....making it ammo is taking away pepoles need to fall back for ammo also

funny thing is they already have the perfect recipe for perfect bf experience (bf4) yet they still fail to deliver it!

For the call in there should be categories and rules about where you can call what in. It's ok to call in AA or tanks if you're deep in friendly territory for instance and in specific drop zones. You call the vehicle in and take it to battle, you don't drop it into a battle, if you get my meaning? We had vehicle drops in BF2 right? Albeit controlled by the commander.

@QuellTheHeresy

11 ай бұрын

I feel like calling in light transport, ammo boxes, maybe a mortar strike like bf5 could work if they brought back squad points, but tanks and aa absolutely nah

Best mackay impression

Why does everything look like it has a white filter on it. I go back and play BF4 and the colors are so deep and I the only one who sees this?

We don't always see eye to eye but I agree with you here

0:54 bruh

Every time I heard that “5 cups of coffee” McKay line, I’d just imagine shitting your pants while in battle. The worst one was Angel though for me. I would literally yell at my monitor, “Shut the fuck up Angel!!!”

7:09 dats right enders slay queen!!

I would be sad however if in the next game I could only use SMGs as a medic

I agree with all of the points, but the capability of using any weapon you want in any class. I hated having to use engineers in BF4 just to use AS VAL. I agree only a few couple of weapons should be reserved to some classes, but there are specialists you can take advantage of by playing more aggressively, such as Paik. This ability of using any weapon helps a lot, for instance, in BF4 you’d see a lot of assaults running operation locker just to play with AEK-971, while this person might like medics more. I don’t know, I feel putting a slight buff to a weapon category to a specific class is a nice way to balance this. I, however, do understand the feeling behind this every class any weapon complain. I kinda like though.

@IagoVtr

10 ай бұрын

Moreover, I loved the specialists thing, I think that should stay. The majority of people advocate for the old classes return. However, that’s in the past, the games have changed already and what worked really well might not bring up the same good feelings again. I believe, this is more nostalgic feeling than everything else. The specialists should stay, remove the plus menu from the weapons, and prioritize weapons category with their strengths, such as SMG being good at close range, this plus menu is indeed, terrible. If you had set up your weapon in the main menu, that’s it in the game there shouldn’t be the option to tweak it.

The gun play in this game is never gonna stop feeling weird

I totally agree with all of these points and I even see a lot more stuff DICE made in the past 3 Battlefield I want never to come back, and yes I mean also points besides of all the crap of BF2042, especially when it comes to vehicles but also gun mechanics: like I never want to see tech trees for gun and vehicle upgrades again (BFV) I never want to see "hold X to repair your vehicle and if you got hit by 1 HP of Damage you have to start again" (BF1 and BFV) I never want to see ammostations for vehicles again (BFV) I never want to see a way too clear and too overpowered thermal sight (BF4) I never want to see sweetspots again (BF1) (I personally prefer a body one shot range from 0 to like 15 or 20 meters)

I really enjoyed the way things were set up in Battlefield V. I like to see that in the next game. Plus, I’ve never seen a good Vietnam Nam battlefield game.

Every publisher wants "RPG" themes, despite the fact that one in a million releases actually have true/simulated RP interaction. That's why every weapon or vehicle is obscenely versatile. It also explains why what should be a non-descript military force, in fact resembles the lunchtime denizens of an upmarket wine bar. We're one step away from combing their hair and dressing them.

How did suppression not make this list?

One thing I will say is that if they have restricted weapons for classes they NEED to make good maps. I personally never want to see another mercury or metro from bf5 where the only 2 classes you can play are either recon or support just because the maps are so shit for any ar/smg and you need a sniper or shotgun to play the game.

You're my hero Agree on all points with no comment or critic… We can hope, but i don't think we will get what we want or wish.. The kids from 12 to 16 are the main audience for BF

Most of these are good but i think you are wrong about the 60mm mortor on MBTs. Tanks should have a lot of firepower and be a force to be reckoned with, especially in a game with so many ways to kill a tank. Dice needs to reward teamwork in a way thats fun and rewarding for everyone in the veichle. Not simply laying on the back of a tank and repairing. Attack veichles need passanger weapons that average players can do well with, not just weak macine guns that only really good PC players can use effectively. The mortor on tanks is a great weapon that rewards teamwork in tanks, and is effective for most players, even if uf they only have a moderate skill level. It allows even moderate skilled squads to plan and execute teamwork strategies that they otherwise couldn't hope to achieve. As long as the tank itself is not OP, and has counter play options for enemies, this is perfectly fine.

3:55 If they do Plus system they should just have Scopes in it.

Nailed it on the voice overs. I would prefer something more like BF3, it felt more like what soldiers would be saying. I would like to throw in the announcers as well. Either not have them or make them sound more like what radio chatter sounds like.. As for the plus system, I think it is a good system bur just like BFVs class system, it could use some tweaks. Like, not having so many slots. I feel you should have whatever you put on the firearm but then just have one slot for each attachment point and that is it. But also, narrow down what you could or would realistically put in an assault pack. I.e. you are NOT going to be carrying a complete whole upper receiver to swap back and forth for your rifle to fire close combat ammo. Irl, to do that isn't just swapping out the magazine but also the bolt carrier group. Like wise, for heavier ammo, like say switching the standard 5.56 round out for a 7.62 ' 308' round.....you need a whole complete upper receiver for that not just switching mags. Like wise....if you have a heavy barrel equipped, that should block out any other attachments for that option, while you are spawned into that map. Because, you are NOT going to be disassembling your firearm to swap out a barrel for whatever attachment you want. Keep it somewhat realistic, different mags of the same caliber for example. Like AP rounds or tracer rounds for low light engagements or SAP rounds ' I really don't know if those are available or not irl for rifles ' or suppressors, flash hiders, muzzle breaks, etc. THOSE are doable and makes sense on how you are carrying them in your ' pack ' but again, you should be limited to just what is on the weapon then the one extra slot in your pack, that is it. As for the call in nonsense, be done with it. Feels too CoD like. Like killstreaks...except worse. Everything should spawn on map like BF3 and BF4 had. Maybe have it as both, spawn in on map but you can still have access to them in the spawn screen. But you should NOT be in the middle of nowhere and be able to call in anything, unless you are requesting a pick up from a friendly transport pilot or ground unit. Also, I completely agree on the transport vehicles ' ground and air ' they shouldn't have anything more then a machine gun. Idc what type of machine gun but just a machine gun. No cannons or anything...because those vehicles aren't meant to go toe to toe with armor or jets or attack helos...or even scout helos. Which brings me to another point. Could they NOT try to reinvent the wheel again? Stick to the vehicle classes from BF3 and 4 FFS...they worked and made sense.... All the said, I know this would go against your explosive spam downgrade but.....I miss my mortars dang it. Idc how they balance it, even have it where I show up on the radar with each shot...and I stay on the radar for x amount of seconds. I just want to be a mortar team again..lol. Recon running the MAV or some other spotting gadget, support running mortar and ammo crate....those were fun days

Enders doing honest work like always ❤

Agreed! What happened to war games being war games?

Nations collapsing, world in chaos, death and starvation - "i'M jUsT bETtEr tHaN eVErYoNE eLsE" Also I would add: don't give (unlimited) TV missiles to infantry, oh and spawn camping TOR needs to go too

It would be nice for the game to release in a finished state that would be a better start than the last 2 games

Wasn’t eating breakfast during the last video but am during this one :)

Wait untill winter holidays, i bet they will sell boris skin as santa and mc kay with red nose.

If you're going to take weapons off of tanks, you need to get rid of the emp and most of the other anti vehicle crap too.

Need to bring back sqd perks that work together like bf3. Add air control movement back. Fluid ads to hipfire jump and crouch transitions.

7:07 bruh LMFAO 😂

Most 2042 voice lines zesty af 😂

What amazes me is that they haven’t monetised the sounds. You’d buy a dozer upgrade that did farts when you battered someone huh?

Call in system is okay if players cant spawn tanks on roof top

Just in time for breakfast

Limit which guns classes can use?!?!? But I love getting sniped by a McKay who's used his grappling hook to get to some ridiculous place no one else can reach.

😂😂😂😂😂 amazing your Mackay voice. It's almost like Mikey. 😂😂😂

I've tier one'd the sticky and had loads of fun, laughs, and giggles watching players blowing themselves and their team mates up. I think I'll start playing with them again for the shits and giggles. Thanks for the reminder.

They really did make this BF the "Jack of All Trades, Master of None". Before I get the comments, yes, except for naval combat.

Remember how stupid Will Smith looked when he was handed the 'noisy cricket'? I took a long time gettin' good on Battlefield 4. I contributed in the early days by being a back line helper and didn't appreciate being handed a 'pew pew' weapon just because. Incentives are in the game to help you choose but having the freedom to pick your best one in a game as fluid as BF is what give this common GI Joe a fighting chance.

when they drip feed you portal guns and map "reworks" you know the content dried up a year into launch.

1. More immersivity ( actual warfare setting, no cringy lines,...) 2. The ranger is ok as long as it is limited to support players (heals, gives ammo, revives,...) 3. Better maps please, I don't want to be shot from EVERY direction all the time.... 4. The plus system is OK in my opinion, maybe they could just restrict the weapons type to the class like BF4

@externalboss9404

11 ай бұрын

Immersion is boring

I concur

You should post videos of good old BF games as well.

Cmon Max, the voice over argument was too much lol! Angel does it again!

@EndersFPS

11 ай бұрын

ANGEL WILL NEVER DO IT AGAIN

@khail127

11 ай бұрын

@@EndersFPS :(

Big agree

Why do you want to remove an entire feature instead of tweaking it? The BSVM is literally the only weapon in the game which can be changed so drastically by the plus menu. Just remove the CQC ammo. It‘s often a very rewarding mechanic. In older BF games, you could never use a 12x scope or a bipod or add a suppressor when you got a good flank going etc. Every experienced player ran the same attachments which were most effective for most situations. Less tactical depth, no room for niche attachments. I‘m not convinced that it‘s a bad feature.

I can't say on behalf of 2042, because I never played the game, but I think the call in feature in BFV was done quite well. I adore that I can call in a supply drop to get ammo out in the middle of nowhere.

@mick1189

11 ай бұрын

@@Riorozen Also BFV didn't let you call in vehicles anywhere, only on your deployment, so if they choose to do it that way, it would be alot more balanced.

cant really argue with these takes

🤔An offtopic for people struggling with rather high desync issues on PC, I am an EU player and I've been playing with cross-play for a while, after trying a few games without cross-play the issues are ether gone or unnoticeable. So one of the things I would put on the list is: DO NOT DO CROSS-PLAY DICE, YOU CAN'T BE TRUSTED WITH IMPLEMENTING IT CORRECTLY (they will do it anyways)

4:50 i cannot stress how utterly dogshit the readability is, im so sick of being sniped by a flying squirrel or a support character that shouldn't even have the gun in the first place

6:55 😂❤

big thumbs up to this list