Participant: (sobbing) I can't believe I just killed that person. Milgram: woah, chill out - it's just a prank bro.

@taitjones6310

5 жыл бұрын

You've been punked!

@anduro7448

5 жыл бұрын

Sounds like your avrage youtube prank channel

@kimzastrow1268

5 жыл бұрын

Seriously

@Grabbearjet

4 жыл бұрын

lmao that gave me a huge laugh, thank you sir.

@weezerboy6910

4 жыл бұрын

"YO YO YO IT'S YA BOI, MILGRAM, BACK AT IT AGAIN WITH ANOTHER E P I C PRANK!"

you missed some important points on the little alberd. he was later not only afraid of rats but also of any fluffy animal and in the end he even was afraid of beards. little albert later died at the age of 6. also his mother was a nurse at the hospital Watson worked as a doctor so she probably never really had a chance to consent.

@JG-gg7fb

7 жыл бұрын

Albert's story is such a sad one :(

@siriustheislandprotector9720

6 жыл бұрын

Sniffylocket 151 dunno, maybe died from the fear of mice? (Joke)

@SraTacoMal

6 жыл бұрын

Omg poor baby!

@wellesradio

6 жыл бұрын

A short miserable life. Thanks, science!

@thegeorgiemoore

6 жыл бұрын

Late af but I swear I read that at the time of the experiment she was actually at university and had him at the universities day care centre and that’s where they picked up little Albert? I also read that she didn’t actually know of the experiment at all until the day she pulled him out of it.

A good way to avoid bystander effect in others around you is by giving specific people tasks such as, "you call nine-one-one" instead of "someone call nine-one-one." This ensures the task is more likely to be done since the person feels that responsibility falls on to them. Also, simply knowing about bystander effect can help you to avoid it.

@timkramar9729

2 жыл бұрын

No, it's not my problem and none of my business. I would ignore it.

@JoeyvanLeeuwen

2 жыл бұрын

huh i never considered this but that was part of my CPR training years ago!

@icarusbinns3156

2 жыл бұрын

This also spawned the ‘What Would You Do?’ tv show. One of my psychology classes in college did a smallish Bystander Experiment. We were to ‘trip’ along one of the sidewalks, and see how quickly someone would help. And we added different things, like: a bright jacket, a load of books, using crutches, etc. we found that women were more likely to get help. Smaller people would be helped faster. And if someone had a known medical condition, help was almost instant. Also, it depended if we yelped or cried out as we fell vs if we were silent. It was an interesting experiment. I kind of enjoyed it…

@serenkeating7672

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, this was one of the things that was drilled into my head as part of my CFR training with the Order of Malta.

@timkramar9729

Жыл бұрын

@@toptengamermoments I don't expect to be helped. I expect everyone to take advantage of me. That person's not coming to help, but to rob me.

I was dead ass like "why does this guy look like off brand John Green" then realized it's his brother LMAO

@user-pv1kt7qq8d

3 жыл бұрын

OFF BRAND JOHN GREEN- you did not just tell us you thought he was like the cheaper version of a John Green

@thewanderingmistnull2451

3 жыл бұрын

Yeah, that's ridiculous. John is clearly off-brand Hank.

@burcebanning

3 жыл бұрын

@@user-pv1kt7qq8d he just looked like John Green but slightly off for me 😂

@user-fo8lz6om7l

3 жыл бұрын

This whole thread. Beautiful.

@Mikelaxo

3 жыл бұрын

Who's John Green?

Fun fact, there was a later experiment similar to the milgram experiment except this time, they wanted to know what personality types were more likely to rebel against the "authority figure" so they got information from friends and family about the subjects' personalities. The result: The people most likely to refuse to shock the person were described as outspoken, opinionated and confrontational. So yeah, those annoying people always making long winded speeches about what's wrong with the world? They may annoy you, but they're almost the most likely to stick up for you against authority.

@mistertheguy3073

7 жыл бұрын

But is it good that they would stand up against authority

@suntank6

7 жыл бұрын

When appropriate. When authority is acting unethically or illegally.

@mistertheguy3073

7 жыл бұрын

***** then it's good but when do those people think when something is unethical? if they for instance allow industries who produce meat?

@mistertheguy3073

7 жыл бұрын

McGlow true but everyone has a different perception of good and evil

@jonanice

6 жыл бұрын

Derren Brown, Heist special? Yeah, he hypnotised them after to undo the effects he may have caused on their minds though after the various tests so that was cool.

Another unethical point against Milgram is that if a participant asked to stop, they were given 4 verbal 'prods' such as "the experiment requires you to continue" before they were allowed to leave, making them believe that they had to finish and therefore breaking the 'right to withdraw' ethical guideline. The distress caused by Milgram's study was also so severe for some participants that 3 of them had seizures.

@aleenax2490

6 жыл бұрын

+

@LEPShot262

6 жыл бұрын

Do you have a source for that? Specifically for the 'seizures' some participants endured?

@KokosNaSnehu2

5 жыл бұрын

Nope, nobody had seizures. Edit: Turns out they did.

@o76923

5 жыл бұрын

@@LEPShot262, Milgram's Behavioral Study of Obedience is the source. He described seizures on page 375. library.nhsggc.org.uk/mediaAssets/Mental%20Health%20Partnership/Peper%202%2027th%20Nov%20Milgram_Study%20KT.pdf

@o76923

5 жыл бұрын

@@KokosNaSnehu2, did you even read the study? He described 3 participants having seizures one of which so severe that they had to end the experiment early. Here's a picture since you couldn't seem to find it. pasteboard.co/HFDplHq.png

the Bystander Effect happens so much in the real world. example: a horrific scream rings out in a small neighborhood. everyone living nearby assumes that someone else has called police, so nobody actually calls.

@howtowithelizabeth7513

2 жыл бұрын

Call just incase but sadly people won’t

@SageArdor

Жыл бұрын

I remember one time when I was in middle school I heard a blood curdling scream from a few streets over. I was about to call police but my dad intervened and stopped me, saying it was "probably already handled". Next morning, there was crime scene tape all over a nearby apartment complex.

@foxbuns

Жыл бұрын

@@SageArdor imagine what could have been prevented if you had just called.

Hank, my psychology teacher linked 3 videos for us to watch, and this was one of them. After suffering through the first two boring, life-draining videos, I managed to muster up the courage to watch the third, and when I saw SciShow and your beautiful face, I was transported to cloud nine! I watch your videos just for fun, I love you!!

@SaraS-jq1ln

4 жыл бұрын

You had to "muster up the courage" to actually watch the video shown in class? 😆😆 wow pathetic. I bet you don't get good grades if you can't even pay attention on video day

@Grabbearjet

4 жыл бұрын

@@SaraS-jq1ln top of my class, actually in line to be valedictorian. That's what makes this comment hilarious 😂

@babyyouremyforevergirl8998

3 жыл бұрын

@@SaraS-jq1ln pAthEtIc

@vincentdreemurr

3 жыл бұрын

@@SaraS-jq1ln you're pathetic lmao

@uv-al

2 жыл бұрын

@@SaraS-jq1ln are you okay? Do you perchance not have a loving father? You being bullied?

Actually the bystander effect could be explained by Cialdini's "social proof". In an unknown or unfamiliar situation, we observe others to adapt our behaviour, because most of the time, the behaviour of the majority is the most suited. It's not just that we're waiting for an other person to act, we're in fact not sure how to react so we observe others. But if the others are also observing, it can lead to a situation where nobody moves and looks around, a collective incapacity.

@cherylbaker3319

5 жыл бұрын

I feel this sounds obvious as if might be wrong and stupid fool for missing the point, but in the bystander effect of which crowd size affects responsibility of self to say or act or respond to be a ratio observed easily, how does this effect miss the fact that if we were in situations of which response is essentially always a possibly known/unknown of awareness here, but despite awareness, it be potential danger/threat to us and being alive is kind of; the core of every single one of us as overall we did have Darwin kinda speak on this evolutionary survival which yes, is our alert system inbuilt to keep survival instinctual, and maybe bystanding is not really about responsibility but leaves a great huge hole as to why people wouldn't react.. As also if the scenario controlled 100% risk to any danger to us I'm sure responsibility then would be a ratio of people reacting be majorly and anyone else be choosing to not react despite it costing nothing to what sounding like those labelled in "Sick/C**t" terms. Am I missing entirely out reason or something thinking that perhaps we do not respond in our own chance of instinct to survive, be sounding a huge flaw over putting it really to responsibility and crowd size, as doubting my whole understanding of this because it sounds too obvious to me? As your comment actually read to me as what the effects of crowds do on influence us to bigger crowd number, quicker we feel uncomfortable to oppose. And bystander responsibility easily could be that known fact; especially if increase numbers are decrease oppose; essentially react as different to and reading this I feel you tapped on a huge missing gap as well.. I think this effect based more on the two missing factors explaining why no one responds instead it be sole responsibility causal alone. As I know and admit the other 2 are my own reason if not respond in situational theory here, responsible I feel is not going to be first calculated nor really would be in mind when mid-witnessing, I would feel responsible to do what to equally be each persons minus the group of minority, in feel responsibility to react in situations. Anyone like they deserve some label of more human iinstinct as hero when in situations where such person often runs into the knowing of how actual death risk is but however they do so in order of saving another life, and heroic is these rare types, sacrificially a saint like non-human instinct based persons we do name as heroic but hear in news a single act of what is going against survival and truly they are so few they do have name read or highlighted across our massive population, rightly so, but shows some reason linking to that in a rare responding few are the norm against what is shift of responsible to another, as few in population respond because of instinctually driven most are to get from threat to safe in anything of life..

@laurenbruges8784

3 жыл бұрын

Also diffusion of responsibility. Assuming someone else will step in leads you to stand back.

@froggybug

2 жыл бұрын

Like 50-leven folks standing around watching a cop kneel on a mans neck and MURDER him instead of mobbing the cops to stop them.

@spikedthenuke7383

2 жыл бұрын

@@froggybug wow you just changed the whole world with your comment *sarcasm alert*

@fdp6517

Жыл бұрын

Very interesting thanks for sharing this perspective!

Milgram did a lot of variations of that experiment, and most of them had varying results. When you take all of the experiments together (not just the widely publicized one), it actually shows that people DON'T respond all that well to authority (almost everyone refused to go further when told "You MUST continue"), but they can do some awful things if they believe what they're doing is for the greater good.

Little Albert actually ended up being scared of EVERYTHING white and fuzzy 😵 poor little guy!

@charliedavis5787

3 жыл бұрын

The baby was quite sick so it's unclear where his fear was a result of the experiment. The experiment has never successfully been replicated.

@rippspeck

3 жыл бұрын

@@charliedavis5787 Well, Jim conditioned Dwight with the Windows startup sound and mints, so there's that.

@Krimay.

2 жыл бұрын

I think the little homie died when he was 6 or so...

The Milgram experiment is completely unethical, but I've always found it fascinating. It explains how so many atrocities can be committed around the world.

@randomplebian461

Жыл бұрын

Honestly, yes. I still want to see the proper details of the experiment to see if it was truly scientific, but from what little I know, it makes us face some uncomfortable truths about ourselves. It's easy enough to say 'no' to an authority figure if you know something is wrong, but the real challenge is fighting the pressure that comes with it. Irl, it might translate to facing said disgruntled authority figure for a prolonged period of time & other consequences and also, people do have social equivalents of his 'verbal prods' going on, which do push them to do what they might not have done otherwise. This must be a common occurrence in soldiers, a lot of who throughout our history weren't specialised fighters but civilians with bare minimum physical training. At least we recognise PTSD in soldiers now, back then they had to return to the normal grind and battle it silently for the rest of their lives.

@saartheunissensciot2325

Жыл бұрын

It was totally rigged tho and was designed in a way that the participants almost couldn't refuse to finish the task.He did years of research leading up the his actual experiments just to assure he would have his one way ticket to fame. So it isnt as accurate as you would think!

@cg0825

Жыл бұрын

The Milgram experiment was also repeated a few times. The first time it was either done at Harvard or Yale I forget which so they thought that since it was held at a prestigious ivy league college that the results may have been skewed. When they repeated it, they found an old warehouse and set up shop there and repeated the same experiment and the results were exactly the same.

@georgedunkelberg5004

Ай бұрын

@@cg0825 BUTT..... THAT'S JUST TWICE! THE "TRUTH" MUST BE REPETED UNTIL THE FIRST GLITCH SURFACES, AND THEN ON AND ON BEING MEASURED UNTIL THE SECOND HAPPENS. WOULD THAT SATISFY A-I?

I heard that some of the monster study kids that didn't have stutters to begin with started stuttering from the negative feedback. A documentary I saw said that some kids also became so withdrawn they wouldn't speak at all.

@VashtiPerry

4 жыл бұрын

Sailrjup12nh of course

In the 7th grade spelling bee, I was asked to spell Pavlovian. I got it right, now I get nervous when I hear that word.

@genshinreads6024

4 жыл бұрын

ThruThe9 okay... I'm sorry but why?

@KendlickLama

4 жыл бұрын

Xandra M. Read the comment or watch the video

@Tropicallyglutenfree

4 жыл бұрын

Clever

@abdurrahmanbausing5023

4 жыл бұрын

@@genshinreads6024 can you explain?

@genshinreads6024

4 жыл бұрын

Swift Abduction No I can not. I, to this day, do not understand

The “Monster Study” is SO frustrating to me. I have a speech impediment(I was born with a cleft of the soft palette) and I had to do speech therapy for years and still am doing speech therapy. I have an extremely high pitched voice and often breathe through my nose and have a nasally voice. My speech teacher does provide positive support BUT I’ve been around people and still am around some people who will undermine me and act negatively towards me because of my voice. I currently have a lot of self confidence issues when it comes to speaking and I wish there was better positive feedback when kids with speech impediments or kids who go/went to speech therapy get since it can cause a lot of issues with talking if you don’t get that proper support.

@piercedsiren

2 жыл бұрын

My issue isn't even that bad yet it still gives me anxiety to speak in public. But i can't say i had support so.. just "that's not how you say it !" Or mocking me for saying some words wrong. It's Dyslalia and sometimes I stutter too. (Didn't stop me from being fluent in two languages. English and French.)

@fpsRhythm

2 жыл бұрын

Paul Stamets speaks openly about how he was able to counteract his stutter. May or may not help.

@tireddtye

2 жыл бұрын

@@fpsRhythm I actually don’t have a stutter, I have an extremely nasally voice as well as an extremely high pitched voice, speech therapy helps with my nasally voice but I’m going to hormone therapy to help with my high pitched voice since that is an issue with hormones. But thank you anyways!

@vulpixlover4ever

Жыл бұрын

How old are you? If you are still young enough to still be in school (not college/university) I'm pretty sure this is something that will get much better for you overtime! Adults are a lot nicer in general than kids/teenagers, in my experience. In elementary school I had to take speech classes because I had a bad stutter and in middle school my voice/stutter gave me so much anxiety that I couldn't speak at all even when I wanted to. I even got sent to detention once because I couldn't answer a teacher's question when they called on me. lol I've been out of school for almost a decade now and I don't really have any problems with my voice anymore. I've had like 1 person maliciously make fun of my voice in that entire decade, whereas in school I got made fun often enough (and just remember that anyone who makes fun of you for a speech impediment is a miserable person in general so I don't take it too personally, or try not to). Anyways best of luck to you!

@salvatore2004

Жыл бұрын

Same I was born with a cleft lip

The Stanford Prison experiment was also deeply flawed -- the students realized what their boss wanted and played along with it, which negates most of the value of the experiment.

The stanford experiment was better at showing what happens when authority operates without oversight. The fact that they were given clubs and told "do whatever it takes" simply recreated why prisons were hell-holes for thousands of years, why many societies led to revolutions, and why a dictator style government can create genocide. The participants taking on roles was less important than it being a reminder that unrestrained power always goes badly... which we could easily learn by cracking a history book

@friendstastegood

7 жыл бұрын

I'm sorry but "were" hellholes? Have you seen a modern american prison? Have you looked at the documentation on what happens to "enemy combatants" in the hands of american military? Lets not pretend this is some bygone barbaric practice that we've successfully rooted out of society...

@Garethaxz

7 жыл бұрын

Actually, yeah they used to be allot worse, so did "mental institutions" you can't just whip out a self-righteous false-equivalency fallacy here lol, no body said we didn't still have a long way to go.

@Yesuhey

7 жыл бұрын

it's tragic that everytime we win over the system, they build even menacing one but don't improve on intentions

@AltFreak25

5 жыл бұрын

Lord of the Flies

@melissawickersham9912

5 жыл бұрын

Who watches the watchers?

Now they call it Social Experiment

@birdman1741

7 жыл бұрын

That isn't even close to being correct.

@gueldenerlarry8270

7 жыл бұрын

You aren't even close to understanding sarcasm

@birdman1741

7 жыл бұрын

+Gueldener Larry oh my bad. I fully understand sarcasm. Just hard to detect it through text

@Nitsugalego

7 жыл бұрын

[[[[[[GONE WRONG]]]]]

@Sam-ze9mo

7 жыл бұрын

It's just a prank bro

I once saw an experiment involving elementary school students and their eye color. They made blue eyes superior to brow then switched to brown being better than blue. It was a powerful thing to see.

@abig_old_swan

3 жыл бұрын

you’re thinking of jane elliott.

@janellethebelle3536

3 жыл бұрын

That is what is happening today with CRITICAL RACE THEORY.

@abig_old_swan

3 жыл бұрын

@@janellethebelle3536 you don’t know what critical race theory is, do you? Define it for me.

@niharbehere1584

2 жыл бұрын

Abigail S. Critical race theory is simply “different races exist, and we need to acknowledge that” and NOT “this race is better than this race”

@wisteria3032

Жыл бұрын

also completely unhetical because the children couldn't give any kind of consent but especially because they weren't informed of it being an experiment or even a game. they were debriefed afterwards but that's too little

For the Bystander Effect, I actually have called 911 a couple times because I know about it and I reasoned "it's better they get a few calls than none at all." If I didn't already know about the Bystander Effect, I'm not sure if I would have done the same thing. I hope I would, but we'll never know for sure. But I do know I helped at least once because I found out, while I was on the phone with 911, that I was the only one in the immediate area with a cell phone. I could have just walked by. So don't let the Bystander Effect get ya, be the help.

why am I not surprised that the Stanford prison experiment was on the list

@gangrenegengar1254

7 жыл бұрын

Because everyone learns about it in school so it's one of the few you actually already knew about...

@General12th

7 жыл бұрын

It's something everyone knows about.

@Kaalyn_HOW

7 жыл бұрын

To those who just said something to the effect that it's "one everyone knows about"....? that's all the more reason for it to NOT be in this video. If we already know about it, tell us about others we DON'T know. That doesn't make any sense as a reason to be included in a video on a channel that's goal is to teach us new things.

@FrankNStein-wk4oj

7 жыл бұрын

The only reason you made this comment is that you wanted to show off with your knowledge of that one psychological experiment. Your intentions are so transparent and predictable.

@marissaclaudio6318

7 жыл бұрын

because it's relevant

i knew the Standford prison experiment would be on here before i saw it

@woodsplitter3274

4 жыл бұрын

That and the Milgram study.

@seanpaul7305

4 жыл бұрын

Sick 🤙

@ybfromoblock3381

4 жыл бұрын

Wood Splitter yeah weird how I knew of those beforehand. And the bystander one.

@insertianameia2224

3 жыл бұрын

When i was a yoinger teen I first learned about it by watching a movie from Germany that was based on this experiment. Afterwards I looked it up to learn more.

@maxfotoalbum243

3 жыл бұрын

the study was later actually debunked as it turned out the lead researcher had pushed the prison guards to be more forceful with the prisoners. The same study was repeated later by BBC iirc but because the guards weren't influenced by anyone to treat the prisoners harshly, they ended up being very friendly, sharing food and playing cards with them. This made for bad TV of course so the show was discontinued I believe

I don’t think he truly went into how cruel the Stanford Prison Experiment was

@karlrovey

2 жыл бұрын

It didn't even study what Zimbardo claimed he was studying. He claimed it was about prison conditions. Due to his meddling with his own experiment because it wasn't initially showing the "innate cruelty of humans," it became a compliance and conformity experiment. According to a similar experiment in the UK, there wouldn't have been problems had Zimbardo simply been an obssrver rather than suggesting the guards be more aggressive and stirring up trouble. According to some interviews, the participants figured out what Zimbardo wanted from them and played their parts hoping for good grades and approval in return.

@uv-al

2 жыл бұрын

Even though it was cruel, I still think it was important. It tought us alot about psychology and pulling experiments.

@char1211

2 жыл бұрын

@@uv-al It really didn't though, it was a horribly constructed experiment so in the end it wasn't even testing what it was supposed to and came to no reliable conclusion other than "in some circumstances humans can become very cruel" which we all already knew

@hamishfox

Жыл бұрын

The only thing it taught us is that Zimbardo is a complete hack and will do anything to get the results he is looking for. The experiment is completely useless.

@espiritu2757

Жыл бұрын

@@uv-al No, it was just sick. We learned nothing new and Zimbardo is seriously troubled.

"The prisoners were searched, then given ID numbers to dehumanize them." School be like

@OfTheiAm

4 жыл бұрын

School is like that on purpose, It was designed to initiate kids into the work force, But it never changed The bells tell you when to leave, your every action is controlled even going to the bathroom. This formula never changed even though the workforce did...No longer an assembly line destiny for all..so..Screw you School Or as Ariana Grande would say, Like omg I hate americans lol

@judithkimball2125

4 жыл бұрын

Naoiph; college

@liambrunner3026

4 жыл бұрын

I see you all over the place

@snowpawwolf1123

4 жыл бұрын

@@liambrunner3026 Probably because I'm a literal meme

@404usernotfound_

4 жыл бұрын

@@naoiph6924 One school I went to did that, my math teacher didn't even know my name lmao. To be fair, their were 90 kids in my class, but still

I was once subject to unethical psychological treatment... But, enough about my ex-wife.

@cougarhunter33

7 жыл бұрын

Like those guys in the prison experiment, at least you got laid once in a while...

@Waltham1892

7 жыл бұрын

cougarhunter33 Oh, really? Screwed yes. Laid, no so much.

@MuadDib1402

7 жыл бұрын

I've never even seen you before!

@Waltham1892

7 жыл бұрын

My ex-wife I'm the guy with the broken heart and crushed soul. You've gotta remember me....

@rogerdotlee

7 жыл бұрын

OK, YOU TWO IDIOTS HAVE PERMANENTLY SCARRED ME PSYCHOLOGICALLY!!! Oh the humanity of it all. The Sarchasm is deep and wide....

Just tuned in at the start; I bet the Stamford Prison Experiment makes the list.

@General12th

7 жыл бұрын

I bet you $100 that you're right.

@mrtannzr

7 жыл бұрын

Nope, but the stanford experiment is!

@emiliaholappa7864

7 жыл бұрын

yup

@Xiefux

7 жыл бұрын

its written Stanford. learn to spel

@mrtannzr

7 жыл бұрын

Xiefux in all my years of being a student, I've never learned to "spel"! what is it?

the one about the kids with stutters is so sad. it’s bad enough having a stutter and never feel like you say things quite right - it’s worse to tell a child that to the point of frustration and depression.

The monster experiment couldn’t have just been orphanages. I was in first grade when my teacher told me I couldn’t be in class with normal kids and would have to learn one on one with a speech therapist because I couldn’t pronounce my R’s. My family already teased me at home about it and then I was forced to be taken out of class. I suffer with intense social anxiety and have never been able to have a comfortable social interaction since I can remember...

@Fritaly

5 жыл бұрын

yasmeen peyton yep special education classes continue this to this day more so in less privileged areas

@raspberrycrowns9494

4 жыл бұрын

@@Fritaly I hate special class. I've never been in one myself but we have one at our elementary school and the kids would always avoid/make fun of the sc students. I'm ashamed to say that I myself have avoided them too because at the time I thought they were weird. But in highschool I was in a science program, for the smart kids ( and people who were lucky enough to score high, including me ) and there was this one girl who was in a wheelchair and it shocked me a bit because the kids didn't avoid her nor laughed at her and she was actually one of the popular kids, of course there were some factors to take in like she was one of the smartest and we were already teenagers but you know...

I like pretending to be smart while watching these videos.

The more I learn about people, the more I like my cat!

@Snaperkid

7 жыл бұрын

Your cat thinks you're an idiot. Source: every cat I have ever had.

@Miranox2

7 жыл бұрын

You give it free food, comfy home, baths and you clean its filth. From the cat's perspective, you're a sucker.

@garethdean6382

7 жыл бұрын

The more I learn about people and cats, the more I like dogs. You have to clean up their messes too, but occasionally they bite people you don't like.

@videogyar2

7 жыл бұрын

Cats don't care about their owners. Hell, they don't even think they have owners. They think they own you.

@garethdean6382

7 жыл бұрын

Viktor6665 They care a LOT about you. Specifically what you'll taste like when you finally fall down and stop moving.

Nr 1, Why couldnt they use a pozitive feedback like in pavlovs dogs Example: Every time he touches the rat he can have a candy bar.

@Welshey

4 жыл бұрын

That's operant conditioning, not classical conditioning. It's not what they were trying to study

@tidepodpadthai2633

4 жыл бұрын

He would probably be too scared to do it anyway

@robertpryor7225

3 жыл бұрын

Or an angel gets its wings

Something you failed to mention with the Milgram experiment is that when the test subjects were told they HAD to finish, almost all of them refused. It was only when subjects were given free will that they took the experiment to the extreme.

@wisteria3032

Жыл бұрын

somehow understandable. thinking about relationships rn. A wife tells her husband "thake out the trash". He knows it's his job. He knows it needs to be done. He doesn't like her tone so he doesn't do it. A wife says "do whatever you want" and there he is taking out the trash, saying sorry, asking what's wrong and overthinking what he did. I have seen it happen (in various contexts - thankfully none so serious as killing someone) enough time to wonder about it. Is it a problem with authority or is it that when instructions and consequences are not well defined they are so much scarier than when they are?

@chidubememma-ugwuoke9660

Жыл бұрын

@@wisteria3032 or maybe because humans like to be in control but that’s just a guess

Rather interestingly, the students in the Stanford Prison Expariment weren't the only ones who slipped easily into their roles. Zimbardo himself adjusted very well to the role of Warden and had to have some sense yelled into him.

I watched this video and then the next day, my psych teacher asked us about these exact experiments. Needless to say, the teacher was impressed.

I may be a little late but there are some discrepancies in the video. John B. Watson never unconditioned Little Albert because he was never given the chance. His mother took him one day and ran off somewhere. If I'm not mistaken he did the same thing to another child, but was given the opportunity to un condition him (doesn't change the ethicality of it, however). 2nd, subjects were debriefed at the end of the Milgram experiment. They all met with the actor and were told that they did no harm to him. Milgram knew that he didn't want people walking around thinking that they had, or still could, harm people so mindlessly.

@SaraS-jq1ln

4 жыл бұрын

Those aren't discrepencies, they told the correct facts. They just left out some details on what happened after

@asmrtpop2676

3 жыл бұрын

Ever been abused? Like... I have good and bad memories with my abusers. It’s because abuse is a cycle. Reconditioning isn’t gonna be the same as before the baby was conditioned to be terrified. If anything he will lose trust in himself to know when something is scary or not.

In the Milgram experiment that you referenced, he did debrief them after the experiment was completed. In the Zimbardo experiment he (Zimbardo) encouraged the "guards" to be abusive to the "prisoners" (both groups were students).

Vault-Tec calling!

@adammurphy6651

7 жыл бұрын

Vault 11 was brutal!

@user-ux2dd9pp8x

7 жыл бұрын

Vault 69 (insert Lenny face)

@user-iz3ns6vb2c

7 жыл бұрын

+Poseidon ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

@user-iz3ns6vb2c

7 жыл бұрын

NCR PROUD!!

@krashd

7 жыл бұрын

Gary!

9:50 "you cannot do this study today" Most police officers and prisons replicates this study every day

@LightningSe7en

7 жыл бұрын

Not only that. It also applicable to a lot of heirarchical systems.

@guyshepard9658

7 жыл бұрын

Have you ever even been to a police department or prison?

@dolebiscuit

7 жыл бұрын

I take it you've never been arrested or had to spend time in jail? OP is not wrong.

@Rowow

7 жыл бұрын

Guy Shepard Yes, have you?

@Rowow

7 жыл бұрын

Gem Monger And who are you going to report the violated laws to? The police? The same ones who committed them? Kid grow up and get arrested once, the judicial system is far more fucked up then it seems.

yeah the prison experiment was crazy. especially since the guards were also coached on how to behave, and the dude who had the breakdown and left later said he was pretending to break down because he had an exam to study for or something.

I highly recommend Zimbardo’s book The Lucifer Effect, where he analyzes the Stanford Prison Experiment and other phenomena after decades of reflecting. He doesn’t try to justify for the experiment. Actually he goes to great lenghts to show how flawed and misguided it was. But he has some great insights to human frailty, and how easily we are drawn into situations. And the only protection against it is to acknowledge it.

@davidhopkins8967

3 жыл бұрын

I think the biggest mistake we can possibly make is to read the analysis of someone so caught up in the experiment that his own girlfriend had to persuade him to stop, only by threatening to leave him. None of the results have been replicated since and most of the guards have since said that they were specifically told to be more sadistic. The worst kind of fake psychology,

@undertasty

3 жыл бұрын

@@davidhopkins8967 Did you not read my comment? I already explained that the book DOES NOT justify the experiment, DOES NOT gloss it over, and DOES NOT lie about it or try to re-invent it or validate the results. He goes into great detail about every misguided decision, every flaw, and everything that happened. Including how his partner made him see sense. He spesifically calls her the hero of the story for doing that. He wrote the book decades after the experiment, and he has since delved deep into the things that make people act against their better nature, himself included. But the experiment and it’s aftermath is only a part of the book. It goes deep into the phenomena that makes people act with extreme cruelty in war, how entire nations are swayed to follow dictators, how easy it is to make us believe horrendous acts of violence and persecution are ”justified.” I’d argue that is insight into our flaws we need. Yes the experiment was misguided and harmful and not a very good piece of research. ZIMBARDO KNOWS THAT. But it doesn’t mean he hasn’t learned important things, or that he hasn’t done a lot of worthwhile work in his 50+ year career.

@davidhopkins8967

3 жыл бұрын

@@undertasty yes I did read your comment. Zimbardo has spent years deflecting and gaslighting any criticism of his work from others. In my view he has nothing to add by talking about his own feelings. It’s all just bad science.

If you did it today all you would need to say is ''It's a prank bro!'' and point to a camera.

@christopherg2347

6 жыл бұрын

Unless the other person sues you because you admitted to comitting assault on the mental wellbeing for your fun. Personally I see no difference between trying to scar my skin and my psyche. If anything the psychological attack is worse and longer lasting.

[gone unethical]

@krovellium

4 жыл бұрын

[gone traumatizing]

I remember witnessing two kids (probably around 13-14) having a fight, and the lack of response I saw there was absolutely astonishing. This was at a bus stop right after school, so everyone was waiting for the bus to arrive and was just watching the fight break down between these kids (year/grade 7-8 kids I assume, here in Australia we don't do middle school, so you start highschool at year/grade 7). Aside from the obligatory kids who were probably recording, everyone else was perfectly content just watching it happen. I kinda noticed it late but I was the only person to walk in and stop the fight before it got really serious, though I still hesitated to go there for a good second or two. Considering I was a senior and bigger than them, it wasn't that hard to break up the fight, but it's still amazing how when you see no one else react you have hesitations about reacting too. It made me wonder though, if they were my age or my size, would I have been as willing to stop the fight?

@wisteria3032

Жыл бұрын

I was in such a situation once and it took me this post to understand it was bystander effect. I was in high school - around 16. Exchange student in New Zealand. I was having lunch with another exchange student I had become quite friends with when we heard someone screaming. We went to see what was happening and there were two boys fighting and about 20 people around them just standing still. At the time my reaction was completely standard: I wanted them to stop but I also knew I was weaker than them. I was scared that if I tried to intervene I would get caught up in it (not scared of the teachers but of getting hurt. I was bigger and older than them but very weak - the "my arms hurt when I hold up my phone" kind of weak). I thought if someone else helped me I would go but as an exchange student I knew no one and I didn't want to ask strangers or to endanger my only friend (she was more petite than me, also she was frightened and wanted to get away asap). Also I didn't really know what to do - I had never witnessed a fight before and definitely had never seen how to break one up. I really wanted to go but just didn't have the courage to try. I could have called a teacher but didn't know where to find one, didn't want to be a snitch (since I didn't know why they were fighting) and didn't want to go away from there: I wanted to see what happened. At some point I remember thinking "This has to stop so I'll count to 30 and if no one does anything I swear I'll intervene" While I was counting in my heas a girl that was half my height and probably 3 years younger than me came in yelling at them to stop. I think she knew them. She just went in there and grabbed one and pushed away the other and kept yelling all the time. They stopped. Everyone went away. My friend was a bit shocked and scared. I was embarrassed and kept thinking I should have intervened before the other girl showed up.

I know a girl in high school who tried to condition her crush to be excited to see her by always having a bag of his favourite candies in her purse and giving some to him whenever they met. And the thing is, it kind of worked 😆 You could see how he lit up whenever he spotted her in a corridor, and then get this slightly confused look on his face about the strength of his own excitement 😂

@gabi3742

Жыл бұрын

i remember seeing this story on tumblr omg

@wisteria3032

Жыл бұрын

she's a genius

I love how every single one of your clickbait titles actually deliver. Keep the videos coming

@NightmareCrab

7 жыл бұрын

unlike dnews

@jalo7289

6 жыл бұрын

if its all real its not clickbait

@bread1882

4 жыл бұрын

I've said it once, I'll say it again. That's called using a title for it's intended purpose, not clickbait.

@marcy1949

3 жыл бұрын

Copper Kitsune It baited you to click, but it gave you a happy life in an aquarium instead of on a plate

To be more specific, this does not reference that the Belmont Report is very outdated. Initially the Nuremberg Code was laid out, followed by the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH) and after the Tuskegee experiment the Belmont Report was produced. There are very important distinctions between these regulations, initially the Nuremberg code was not concerned with patient harm and instead valued social benefit. There are now international regulations that are applicable for Clinical trials. ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation) is the standard although from a US perspective ICH is not adopted, but followed. I am in Canada where ICH is adopted and we also have TCPS2 (Tri-Council Policy 2) to follow, which heavily overlap. We must keep records for 25 years while ICH and the FDA only require 2 years after a drug reaches market. source: I work In clinical trials and deal heavily with US-Canada trials. I'm required to know all applicable regulations for both countries.

@krishshah3974

2 жыл бұрын

dam, that's really cool

Sometimes this goes on in home as well, kids will sometimes get punished or physically harmed for getting bad grades, the justification for it is that punishment will encourage them to try better in school.

More recently, Michael Stevens of Vsauce and Mind Field conducted the First ever Experiment based on the Trolley Problem. He consulted an ethics board and two Psychologists in order to conduct it without causing Psychological damage to the participants. The results were interesting.

@infinightmoon6268

3 жыл бұрын

It's worth noting that what you see in Mind Field is edited by KZread, and not representative of the full study. I believe Michael said elsewhere that they ran several more people through, and the Mind Field episode included the only two who pulled the switch. There were far more people than we see who never actually pulled it.

The by stander effect in depth: In a risky situation when playing the hero comes into mind think about the pros and cons. Playing the Good Samaritan gives you a well accomplished feeling and the possibility of making a new friend. But their is always the chance of it going bad like getting injured, permanently disabled, or even killed. Killed is probably the worst one because you'll leave behind a caring family and they might have to pay for all the death expenses, real talk

@azmanabdula

7 жыл бұрын

The selfish gene...

@alexwang982

6 жыл бұрын

death costs money?

@Catlily5

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexwang982 Yes, death cost money. That's why they have funeral parlors.

@alexwang982

2 жыл бұрын

@@Catlily5 Funerals cost money, death doesn't

@Catlily5

2 жыл бұрын

@@alexwang982 Death could be free. Die in a hospital and even death may not be free. Birth could be free too but it usually isn't.

When did they update the comment section on mobile, its weird

@HeadShotPR

7 жыл бұрын

It sucks

@everythingpony

7 жыл бұрын

+HeadShotPR cant like , like if u cant too

@HeadShotPR

7 жыл бұрын

It did let me dislike ^^

@pablotafur539

7 жыл бұрын

It's so badddd

@arisenspirit

7 жыл бұрын

At least we now have more features

"the Lucifer principle" is an interesting read about the Stanford prison experiment. Even though the experiment was flawed and it has been refuted it is still quite shocking to read the extend of the abuse in the experiment.

When you know 4/5 of these experiments from a college psychology course, and none explained them to be unethical, just the facts of what happened. XD

@happyfacefries

3 жыл бұрын

I thought they explained well on why it was unethical

i believe that most of the criticism the milgram experiment got was because that a great many people just simply didn't like the conclusions of that experiment. no person in that experiment actually reported that they somehow were permanently damaged by the experiment itself. each participant was also debriefed after the experiment was over, as to assure that they hadn't actually hurt anyone. it was more that it was just uncomfortable while it was going on. yet, most people choose to stay and continue the experiment, even though they could say no and choose to leave(which some did). which is exactly why this experiment is so interesting to begin with. when people are confronted with negative or uncomfortable truths about themselves which doesn't paint them in a good light, they will usually fight it, instead of trying to learn anything from it. and when you got a society very much based around authority and obedience on so many levels, and an experiment like Milgram's shows up and starts to probe that very notion, of course people will object to it. but that's a more political question than an ethical one. was the Milgram experiment unethical? not so much. did we learn some uncomfortable truths about the average human being? yes, very much so.

@paulmahoney7619

7 жыл бұрын

Making someone think they killed someone is a bit morally questionable.

@Cuddlestrike

7 жыл бұрын

+Paul Mahoney so is keeping pushing the button that actually kills the person. Yet, most keep people kept pushing that button. And like I mentioned, they were all briefed as soon as the experiment was concluded about what had just happened. They got to meet the person they thought they were giving electrical shocks and informed of what they were a part of. No person were left with actual psychological trauma, although they might have learned something new about themselves for participating in the experiments, and as such might have been changed by the experiment.

@TehPompkinHead

7 жыл бұрын

+Paul Mahoney if you ever get the opportunity to watch the move, "the experimenter" it covers his work pretty well

@Edgewalker001

7 жыл бұрын

Technically, the authority figure also got to verbally order the subject to continue with the experiment three times every time he or she expressed concerns, with the last one being a noncommittal but still unyielding statement to the effect of "You MUST continue the experiment." I'm frankly surprised anyone backed out at all, but I guess there will always be heroes. Since those are so few though, you can usually find them in unmarked graves, if they're lucky someone writes their names on a wall somewhere... =p

@daveh4461

7 жыл бұрын

I recall reading about that experiment a few years back. If I recall correctly, the reason this experiment came into existence was to explain how and why German guards in WWII could put so many people to death in the camps. It showed that people could detach themselves emotionally from the actions they were performing, as long as you followed the reasoning of "I was just following instructions."

the Stanford prison experiment gives me the chills it's so scary.

Wow. In my phycology class we watch videos of zimbardo from like the 80s or 90s and had no idea he did something like that. This changes my entire view of good old Phil

@hamishfox

Жыл бұрын

The man was a complete hack and manipulated the students to try to get the results he was looking for. He is not well respected and his research is pretty much universally disregarded as bunkum.

It's literally just "Ferb, I know what we're gonna do today"

The Milgram Experiment was one of my favorites to learn about in Sociology. It's very telling, and very unethical in that participants couldn't be informed so how could they consent? Sure, it taught us that most people will listen to authority (which explains why so many horrible things have happened on national or international scale) but not in the right way.

I like to take each SciShow episode title as a challenge. "Oh yeah SciShow? Watch me perform the psychological experiments." or "Watch me digest this grass."

I've seen the bystander effect even when it's not a serious situation. It's happened multiple times where I've been watching a movie in a theater and something went wrong with the screen or sound. I would see everyone else looking around but no one would go tell the staff. In every instance where this happened I was the one to go out and tell them. I've never been hesitant about taking initiative but this has happened at least 5 different times that I can remember and each time the rooms were packed, yet it was always me. Statistically this shouldn't be and yet that's what happened.

I remember learning about these in grade 12 Psychology, specifically the Milgram Experiment and the Stanford Prison Experiment. These are usually the first things we were taught about.

@cg0825

Жыл бұрын

If you go to college and take social psych they go into most of these experiments and in more detail...and then some. You really learn about the evil nature of some in the world.

The Milgram Experiment HAS been done recently, in the past 5 years at least. So it can be done today, I suppose you'd just have to write up the correct legal document for it.

@ahm7548

7 жыл бұрын

in Denmark they made a reality program about it.

@valerierodger7700

5 жыл бұрын

No, it has not. The study that "recreated" it used lower-level simulated shocks and responses - there was no simulated responses of extreme distress and potential death. They did this *specifically* to avoid the ethical issues of the Milgram experiment. It's not the Milgram experiment if you're specifically avoiding replicating the conditions of the Milgram experiment.

@karlrovey

2 жыл бұрын

The Stanford Prison Study was also replicated (without the researchers meddling in order to stir up conflict). It turns out, when you re-create that scenario without a researcher who can have power over your grades, graduation, job recommendations, etc suggesting that the guards be more aggressive and the prisoners be more rebellious, you don't get the problems that occurred in the Stanford experiment. The participants at Standford figured out what Zimbardo wanted from them and complied, believing that it could affect future grades, graduation, and job opportunities.

Surprised there's no mention of MK-Ultra

@30LayersOfKevlar

7 жыл бұрын

Because it was blatantly illegal, even at the time.

@YiGzit

7 жыл бұрын

you can still practice the MK-Ultra experiments, duuh

@RomrotMechanikos

7 жыл бұрын

+

@gageanderson7612

7 жыл бұрын

it sounds familiar, but I can't remember what it is, could you remind me? o:

@kakapyksid

7 жыл бұрын

When you look at the video, all the experiments correlate on the basis that they were done as an academical study.

There were interviews after the Millgram experiment and the volunteers said the reason that the continued was because they thought it was important for science than a little pain and they were told multiple times that the shocks were not fatal.

About Zimbardo experiment, there were also a lot of things that made the experiment not just unethical, but scientifically worthless. Conclusion was supposed to be that being a guard makes you abusive. But Zimbardo pressured guards to be harsh and only a handful of them turned abusive. There were also a lot more things that made this experiment unethical, including people who wanted to get out of the experiment straight up being refused and kind of being brainwashed to feel like they were really imprisoned for some crime.

i seriously cannot escape this man. was studying for a bio exam last week watching him on crash course now im trying to relax and he's narrating this?! im not mad though

The more you learn about people, the more you like animals. Especially my dog.

Watson intended to decondition Albert, but was unable to do so after Albert was adopted. As for the Stanford Prison experiment, Zimbardo is the reason the conditions went downhill so quickly. He wasn't getting the initial results he wanted, so he had a few "prisoners" and "guards" cause problems. Rather than showing the internalization of roles, it showed conformity to the will of someone in a leadership role.

I have to wonder if the bystander effect is actually a distraction effect. The presence of lots of people engaged in a conversation can hold someone's attention.

The stanford prison experiment was a fantastic movie, it really shows how insane the experiment actually was

I'm a little curious why is it called the "monster" expiriment?

@lokicorgi

7 жыл бұрын

cause people who did the experiment were monsters? idk

@nublarrex5690

7 жыл бұрын

makes sence

@nublarrex5690

7 жыл бұрын

i think that falls under child abuse

@spindash64

7 жыл бұрын

+Godzilla204 To put it bluntly, they were orphans: nobody wanted them, nobody valued them. Is that effed up? Yes, but the brain likes to rationalize others pain when it would otherwise overwhelm you. What changed is that, since it is so much easier for information to go from person to person, and so much harder for things to be quiet, is that the people more responsive to such things were more likely to speak up and bring others to act.

@nublarrex5690

7 жыл бұрын

I mean you do bring up a good point, but I feel that the experiment is a little insenative even if they are orphans.

The thing that really framed the flaws in the experimental design of the Stanford Prison Study was an interview with one of the guards in like the 2010s where he recalled that the experiment was more an opportunity for him and the other guards to be large and in charge than it was anything with particular direction or super specific goals. They basically set up a self-fulfilling prophecy: if we encourage, provide opportunity and motive to, and compensate these particular young, white, male university students to be abusive will they be abusive? Oh, and they screened potential subjects specifically searching for certain personalities and behavior patterns

I experienced the bystander effect but as the real victim. I got in a bad car accident caused by someone illegally swerving into my lane. As I was able to avoid all collisions, I was the only person really effected, having swerved off into a ditch; the car damaged but no serious damage to me. I'm in my 30's and I've been in a few accidents so I knew the process, I was in shock, I calmed my breathing, put my hazards on and waited to safely exit my vehicle as it had swerved completely away from the busy traffic. Not a single person stopped, including the person who caused me to crash off the side of the road. No one stopped, everyone assumed someone else would stop and I was stuck completely alone. Soon I was in shock simply by how disgusted I was with the driver who caused the accident and everyone who just left me. It's creepy and disheartening.

As a person who is a lab coat wearing student, I'd turn around and be like "You're an idiot, bye." if they said "Shock this human with 450 volts."

@kjones6515

3 жыл бұрын

I'm so glad you have ethics 💜

I used to participate in paid psychology experiments at Princeton University for many years. It was great. They paid $12 per hour to do small studies, which were usually little games or test that you do on a computer. They'd pay $20 for fMRI scans or eeg. They also had one researcher who was studying muscle memory and he had this machine with a lever underneath, that you pull to shoot dots at a target on the screen. It was like an old Pac Man arcade game. It was a lot of fun. But unfortunately, I haven't had a chance to go back since they shut down the campus during the pandemic and they're not doing much of anything now. I miss doing it and I hope to be able to get back there soon. If you're in high school or college, it's a great way to make extra money on the side and you should look into it.

Could Sci Show make a video about peanut allergies please? Like, how and why they're so common and so dangerous? Thanks!

The little Albert experiment honestly seems almost a little funny to me, as well as being slightly horrifying, because my parents accidentally did sort of the same thing to me when I was a baby. They got me a mobile that played a music box version of "Somewhere Over The Rainbow" and they'd play it when they put me down to go to sleep and left. I did not like being left behind, and clearly associated the music with the upset that I am reported to have loudly expressed every night. The practical upshot of all of this is that hearing a music box version of "Somewhere Over The Rainbow" made me cry until I semi-accidentally deprogrammed myself when I was 13 by making myself cry too often because... teenage angst I think?

Can you do one on cerebral aneurysms? I had one rupture at 19 and would love to learn more!

@YiGzit

7 жыл бұрын

a what? That sounds like you are supposed to be dead now.

@thatjillgirl

7 жыл бұрын

No people do survive them sometimes if they get medical help quickly enough. But even then they can be pretty damaging. Definitely not something you want to have happen to you.

@firesong7825

7 жыл бұрын

I think they'd have to do one on aneurysms in general. Cerebral aneurysms are a bit too specific.

@bekawestberg8491

7 жыл бұрын

+

@KCKatheist

7 жыл бұрын

A weak spot in an artery in your brain ruptured, initiating a pulsating torrent of blood flooding immediate areas of the brain. A critical medical emergency, the blood flow must be stopped ASAP, generally via surgical clipping of the affected artery. Such weaknesses in artery walls are often genetic. Post-aneurysm outcomes vary, and are dependent on a number of factors, including the area of brain affected, the size of the bleed, duration before intervention, and the patient's age. ~Kaycee, CNRN, CRRN

the stanford prison experiment was unethical, but it did teach an important lesson, those who have power will always abuse it

I remember a time a homeless person collapsed and every student I was with scattered and ran in the opposite direction while I was the only one to run over to make sure he was ok. The bystander effect is very real but I don't understand it at all. It just confuses me. I think because I have so much anxiety normally situations like that don't really scare me much more than my baseline.

I like that apparently there needs to be a scientific report for these people to finally conclude that ruining a bunch of orphans self-esteem on purpose and never telling them about the fact it wasn't actually about them as a person is 'unethical'

But can psychologists see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

@Guru_1092

4 жыл бұрын

Sugar = dopamine. Not that hard.

@riogrande163

4 жыл бұрын

@@Guru_1092 you must be fun at parties, if you even go to parties....

@Guru_1092

4 жыл бұрын

@@riogrande163 I'm actually pretty fun at parties. You'd be surprised how much people enjoy hearing about my stories as a firefighter, or about my trip to Europe.

@riogrande163

4 жыл бұрын

@@Guru_1092 still a total buzzkill.

@feddyvonwigglestein3481

4 жыл бұрын

lmao

I think the Stanford Prison Experiment tells us a lot about why police misconduct is so common in the US.

My psychology prof actually recreated the prison experiment annually with his students in the early 80s. He did, however, include observers whose primary role was to try to protect the mental health of participants. We were also fully informed of the dangers and outcomes of the original study and we were told to act our role and describe how we felt and what we might do in that role rather than to actually deny people food or whatever. We were given recipe cards that had situations described on them and asked to write our reactions. Sometimes our reactions would be passed on as new situations and so on until the day was done. We were also debriefed in the days following and, through class discussions and activities, any division created by the simulation were removed.

@wisteria3032

Жыл бұрын

how did those experiments go? I mean it's obvious that the results were milder than the original experiment since people were given limits and someone who cared for their mental health but did it actually end up with people internalising their roles or did it just create a division... I need details this is so interesting

@Shria9

Жыл бұрын

@@wisteria3032 I didn't poll the participants but, as one, I didn't internalize my role and no one else seemed to, either. We often slipped out of roles with brief exchanges about our observations. We definitely ended the exercise with a lot more empathy for both sides, though. And a deeper understanding of the slippery slope of authority.

I had to watch this for an assignment in my psychology course. All five of these are both horrifying and terribly fascinating. Choosing just one to take a closer look at will be difficult.

The second principle of the Belmont Report can be broken down further: what you mentioned is "non-malevolence", and you're right. An experiment shouldn't do any harm. However, true "benevolence" is that there has got to be some reasonable benefit to the participants, which can relate to the other two principles: are the participants going to get a fair compensation in time? If not, then it's not justified. Are they getting so much that their participation would seemed coercive? If so, then this defeats the purpose of an informed consent and therefore shows no respect for the participants.

These are brutal.

@ACDBunnie

7 жыл бұрын

+

@Roll587

7 жыл бұрын

+

@TorquemadaTwist

7 жыл бұрын

+Peter Rabitt I know, Bugs Bunny however... What's up, doc? Oh, I think you know exactly 'what's up'.

@VictoriaFaye09

7 жыл бұрын

Look up the Tuskegee syphilis experiment. That one is even worse.

@TorquemadaTwist

7 жыл бұрын

Tori Holbrook Morality doesn't evolve as quickly as science. The catch up between the two is horrendous.

there is a decent dramatization of the Stanford Prison Experiment currently on Netflix if anyone is interested it's just called the Stanford Prison Experiment and is still available as of July 2017

I watched this in psychology class the other day. Keep up the good work you guys!

"Subjects would often be poor, while wealthier patients would benefit from the results of the experiments" I think this is very often still true, a lot of places still do paid trials (e.g. for vaccines or treatments of illnesses) and something tells me it's not rich people lining up to do these trials. Yes they are financially compensated but I think it is still an example of poor people being test subjects while the rich benefit from results

@Sonu-tz2js

4 жыл бұрын

What you said makes sense. Thanks!

How about 5 highly unethical human experiments that would be damn illegal to perform, but could possibly give us some valuable information?

@allanperl5107

7 жыл бұрын

This would be cool, no one has done this yet.

@okaywhynot4728

5 жыл бұрын

This is actually really common with concentration camps back in WW2. In particular, Unit 737 was especially notorious for this, but the leader was actually given immunity from prosecution for his crimes in exchange for the research information. This is real I swear to god

@flyaround312

5 жыл бұрын

Mixa Almost all human experiments, if conducted properly, have the chance of giving us useful information. It's pointless to do if people will be seriously harmed in the process or it's done without their informed consent.

@cherylbaker3319

5 жыл бұрын

It's why I always think how new medical facts often are known by chances be totally unintended/accidental but notice how the outcome then could be worth anything - As penicillin was the result of such insanitary 'lab' where now, not going to be possible in the sanitary experiments like today, yet how great medical now hero named in his science by essentially.. grown fungal in mould reduce but sanitation of the chance that science labs let fungus grow are little or none and essentially brain information we are clueless unless by horrific accidents/medical wrongdoing - for ethical good be save epileptic seizures which were life consuming by known surgical snipping of brain pieces result by moral intent be for good but as a consequence this individual lost his life in terms snipped into parts necessary for memory and essentially he lost his ability to forever form memory again - great knowing but knowing was again ethically by now, not a chance, or be it only by some fluke survival after brain areas are wiped from a still living person, as we study so much but all cases are where medically there has been some horror, loss to life, accidental or pure chance new find huge discoveries, and not to discredit how appreciated the research is by all in the sciences are because without people like them, we would not be anywhere like as advanced we are, but in how vast the benefits from anything but what is unethical, illegal, immoral or worse possible accident naturally, its' how we essentially get the knowledge, dilemma of which no real possible outcome be all fair, so understanding how we got certain things especially in sacrifice of lives before us, I have nothing but gratitude to those never knowing what value they had and never had a life, hope they found peace after what may have been living hell for so many.

@maverickkillmore2996

4 жыл бұрын

the forbidden experiment or language deprivation experiments

I have read about each of these experiments prior to this video. Thank you for sharing this.

My BNursing class in Sydney watched this in a lecture about Evidence Based Practice; the reach of your content is phenomenal; it's hope giving in a way, to see educational content make it so far around the globe and into so many lives.

Just started the video, my bets are on Little Albert, Milgram's shock experiment, and the Stanford Prison Experiment being on the list.

@emilyeslam

7 жыл бұрын

Right on all three counts. Thank you, GCSE psychology.

I wouldn't consider #3 and #4 to be unethical. The only "harm" seems to be that some subjects realized that they were not the greatest humans like they thought they were.

@cilginkosucu

7 жыл бұрын

It's unethical to not obtain informed consent.

@BlueEyesWhiteTeddy

7 жыл бұрын

Are you fucking kidding me?! You're a piece of shit.

@theangledsaxon6765

7 жыл бұрын

Wait, who is? The original poster? How is that? Showing people that they're not superman is a great thing

@BlueEyesWhiteTeddy

7 жыл бұрын

The Angledsaxon Making kids feel uncomfortable about themselves is awful.

@caseyj5637

7 жыл бұрын

Seriously? You're excusing people not helping others when their lives are in danger? What does that have to do with being "the greatest humans"? Where the hell did you get that from?

There’s a reason for the bystander effect though. People don’t want to get involved into something that might put their life in danger or harm them in some way, especially when it comes to losing your life. In the bystander experiment he mentioned, I think there were still a lot of people there when the murder happened but no one wanted to put their life in danger and so they didn’t try to help.

Even though the Belmont Report is meant to help the subjects involved in an experiment, it is a HUGE barrier when it comes to being able to do experiments that would come to a useful scientific conclusion.

I don't understand how the milgram experiment is unethical, nobody got hurt and all the teachers were informed after the experiment that the student was ok by the student himself

@nephdrummond3168

7 жыл бұрын

You said the word yourself, AFTER. It's not ok to get consent from someone to do a test if they don't know what they're getting into. It's tricking people into a test, and that's not allowed.

@nephdrummond3168

7 жыл бұрын

It also might have caused damage to the subjects for life, might not have, but it still shouldn't have been done.

@shwb9

7 жыл бұрын

But if you told the subject, then the whole test would be ruined wouldn't it?

@astanone6059

7 жыл бұрын

+Neph Drummond they were never forced to do anything and if they knew what was going on the experiment wouldn't work. Also any thought that they killed somebody was swept away by them meeting with the person they electrocuted and telling them the whole experiment

@katieeckler7543

7 жыл бұрын

I think it was because the subjects thought that they killed the person which would be horrifying

I wish I had seen this before having to take the CITI training for my job. We had to read the freakin' Belmont Report about three times!

I know that voice!! Haaaaank. 'There's a Hank for that' literally got me through my science a levels and first year of my degree lol

thank you this was very helpful for my learning!!1!!111!111!