Read a full nostalgia-riddled article on old rules changes here: www.cardmarket.com/en/Magic/Insight/Articles/Famous-Rules-and-Card-Changes-in-Magic-History

@TheTrashMob

2 жыл бұрын

Great video. I went through all the changes. But with winterorb, you are a little wrong. when the rules changed, winter orb and howling mine got an erata from WotC, so they were still inactive, when tapped. Like all old Artifacts did back than, like black vise, Ivory tower etc. But to know that, you'd had to look it up at the website. With Mirror Universe you couldn't use manaburn to bring you to 0, because manaburn accoured at the end of the phase. That's why you had to use painlands like City of brass. How about a video, where cards got better due to rule changes? I'm looking at Mana Drain for example. With Manaburn, you needed a way to get rid of the mana. Now you can counter everything without drawbacks.

@jesselaplante1040

2 жыл бұрын

good stuff! tons of nostalgia! i would love to see more videos like this!

@Thumper770

2 жыл бұрын

Your explanation of mirror universe is confusing. How can you burn yourself to zero AND switch life totals if manaburn didn't trigger until the end of phase? You can't burn yourself to zero then switch life totals in the same phase.

@TheTrashMob

2 жыл бұрын

@@Thumper770 The deck was a thing, but yyou burned yourself with City of brass to get to 0.

@Thumper770

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheTrashMob I know how it worked but, that's not what the "League Pro" said. What he said was wrong.

There's actually another rules change involving tolarian academy. It was actually *because* of academy that the original mulligan rule changed. It used to be a free mulligan if you had zero lands or all lands in hand or if your opponent took a mulligan. So decks would run 4 academy as their only lands and free mana rocks for all the rest of the mana, and as you can guess, that was a very busted deck, so they had to change the Milligan rule

@acollectorslifeforme4201

Жыл бұрын

What rules did you play? Paris mulligan was in effect before Tolarian Academy existed and Tolarian Academy was restricted to 1 per deck within 3 months of release. Also original mulligan rule only allowed you to do it once based on all land/no land.

@Roll-Penut

Жыл бұрын

@@acollectorslifeforme4201 this wasn't type 2. I forget what the format was called for all sets being legal at the time but basically vintage because they were using moxen and mana crypt alongside academy

@acollectorslifeforme4201

Жыл бұрын

@@Roll-Penut gotcha, I played classic, extended, block, and limited back in the 90’s, we always used the restricted list even in casual play. Tolarian Academy was broken even with only 1 in a deck regardless.

@soulresuscitate

Жыл бұрын

As mentioned above, the Paris mulligan (any number of reshuffled starting hands drawing 1 card less) was introduced at PT Paris, which featured Visions as the newest set. That was over a year before Urza's Saga released.

@gengis42

Жыл бұрын

@@Roll-Penut Type 1 only restricted a sizeable chunk of banned, non ante cards. Type 1.5 was my personal favorite.

Mogg fanatic was originally printed before damage used the stack so technically it received a buff and was later returned to original functionality

@bobhockey2509

2 жыл бұрын

Removing combat damage on the stack killed Ghost Council of Orzhova.

@bobjohnson7683

2 жыл бұрын

I’m not following you I guess. The rules were one way, so the card was normal at the time, not buffed, then the rules changed and it got a nerf, not returned to original functionality, it was future functionality? I’m not actually familiar with this specific card, but the whole do combat damage then sac it to do more damage is a specter I remember well in my nightmares.

@riddick1128

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobjohnson7683 in the very beginning of the game damage didn’t use the stack. Mogg fanatic is older than the stack as we know it

@zeo868

2 жыл бұрын

@@bobhockey2509 but glarecaster became a fun commander card

@robertmauersberger953

2 жыл бұрын

@@riddick1128 mogg fanatic is older then the game

Imagine how good death shadow would be with mana burn

@mightyfp

2 жыл бұрын

Pulse actually would work well in shadow without manaburn

@tallynnyntyg6008

2 жыл бұрын

If it's Black, there's a Jund or Grixis commander that was introduced in Commander Legends that reintroduces it as an ability.

@nicholasfarrell5981

2 жыл бұрын

@@tallynnyntyg6008 Jund, it's the Viashino guy. I wanted to build around him, and I still might at some point.

@tallynnyntyg6008

2 жыл бұрын

@@nicholasfarrell5981 Right, thanks. I still have to work a deck around Esika based off a video game series.

@TheMorbidHobo

2 жыл бұрын

Would be hilarious in my vilis edh deck

Damage on the stack was hilarious: i still remember one time I was playing Urza standard and I was running Academy, my opponent dealt lethal to me, and since that Academy deck could go off at instant speed, I had him draw his whole deck. Back then, while damage went on the stack, drawing with no cards in the deck was instant loss

@AggressiveLemur

2 жыл бұрын

It wasn't instant, it was just checked when a player would gain priority, just like having 0 life. Damage was assigned, the assigned damage went on the stack, but hadn't been "dealt" yet

@nekrataali

2 жыл бұрын

Academy is my favorite deck of all time. Love the fact the entire combo goes off at instant speed. Opponent has Wasteland? Just go "lel. Lmao, even" and make them draw 8,792 cards. Even more hilarious that it wasn't an infinite combo, you just created that much mana to feed Stroke of Genius.

@davidb4935

2 жыл бұрын

@@nekrataali i have said it before and I'll say it again: urza standard made me the man I am today

@Igor369

2 жыл бұрын

Nice flex, if you can win at instant speed so you can let your opponent damage you first just to bm.

@ncochran01

2 жыл бұрын

The game was very different back in the day. I started around the Revised time. People built decks with big creatures. Creatures were a major way to do damage. Build that green deck and fill it with Craw Worms and Force of Natures. Bring those artifacts. Don't have a Sol Ring? You are probably in trouble.

I was legitimately sad when mana burn was removed. I always wanted to see if it was possible to construct a deck that would kill your opponent purely by using mana flares and whatnot to kill your opponent with mana burn.

@m.r.r.2636

Жыл бұрын

Honestly I couldn't see a reason why WotC couldn't just make a card that re-enables mana burn for those who want to play around with the Isaac flying too close to the sun scenarios of massive mana. Personally I think it was a good thing mana burn got removed, mainly because it got rid of a mechanic that was just a bit annoying that you could manipulate your life total with mana and it made sure that massive mana givers were not "checked" by this rule, so WotC made less types of ritual cards or those rituals were not as efficient as older versions. It's also likely that abilities that only required mana were worsened because it was a safety net against mana burn, so many artifacts or creaturers all had tap abilities for things you would not tap for in modern designs.

@GrizonII

Жыл бұрын

@@m.r.r.2636 “Yurlok of Scorch Thrash” can be used to reenable mana burn.

I came in expecting Jace Beleren and his ability to destroy Mind Sculptor but ended up learning even more about the Legend rule! Awesome video, I'd love to see another video along the same line as this one! :D

@matthewgagnon9426

Жыл бұрын

There was also a time where you could play a Legendary thing while one was in play, but doing so would annihilate both of them.

@ChouRaiyuki

11 ай бұрын

It's funny; I played standard only briefly from basically before Innistrad rotated out to the end of RTR being in. And the only reason I started playing standard was because Liliana of the Dark Realms had just come out and I thought that card was hilariously fun. I absolutely got to enjoy swatting Lilian of the Veil for the small period where that could happen. But yeah I assume that would've been too obvious; Clone would've hit it even closer to home.

Old-timey Magic player here, stopped around 5th edition. I heard later that they canned mana burn and I was like "Well, RIP my Mana Flare-Power Surge-Carrion Ants deck :/"

@Mokibu

2 жыл бұрын

Thy printed an RBG legendary that ads manaburn to the game as long as it is on the battlefield Yorlok Its 1 + Jund/RBG 4cmc ang can giv every player 3mana or something

@barongerhardt

2 жыл бұрын

Same here, stopped buying cards after ice age came out and stopped playing like a year later. One of the youngsters in the family started playing this summer and found out I played last millennium. It has been fun dabbling in it again.

@johnkennedy7234

Жыл бұрын

I too stopped just after 5th. Still have my cards and a smattering of stuff after but only play against family that use my cards and 1996 rules.

I still say "sack in response" referring to damage on the stack. It's wild to remember how much a core part of the game that was. My biggest memory of it was against a friend playing tooth n nail. He'd block with Sakura tribe elder, damage trades, sack in response for the ability. Coming back with mana burn gone was such a weird experience too. Too bad I wasn't collecting back then, I'd have gotten gaeas cradle when it was cheap because I liked Mark Zug. I played during 8ED through guildpact before coming back last year.

@nekrataali

2 жыл бұрын

Sakura Tribe Elder was god-tier when damage went on the stack lol 😂

@keithbarlow9701

2 жыл бұрын

Yep, Sakura Tribe Elder was always the card I associated with damage on the stack. The Elder was basically a mini Fog plus Rampant Growth back then.

I remember in the distant 90s I was playing kitchen table magic at the school cafeteria with decks that basically had every card I had ever opened in the few booster packs I could afford to buy. At one point an older dude told me hey kid you can kill my elf if you sack your fanatic and still have it deal one damage to me. I was like that's cool but how can the creature deal damage to you if it is not even there any more? That is the most stupid rule I've ever heard in my life. Are you sure it is like that?

@Xrilliam762

2 жыл бұрын

It used to be that way, it's not that way anymore. This rule was changed in 2010 or so.

@wimoore

2 жыл бұрын

The way it was explained back in the day (at least to me) was that dealing damage was like throwing a grenade; even if the creature wasn’t there anymore, the grenade had still been thrown so it would still explode and deal damage. But I agree, that system is pretty unintuitive

@algotkristoffersson15

2 жыл бұрын

@@wimoore I mean for some wizard or archer type creature things it would make sense, scince they shot a projectile and then die but the projectile still exists, meenwhile a grizzly bears (why is the one creature named as multiple anyway?) it doesn't, I think there should be a keyword a creature can have that mnakes their combat damage specificaly use the stack to capture such a flavour distinction.

@brianhall4182

2 жыл бұрын

Gosh, I remember playing 4th edition on the picnic tables at recess in Elementary school. I literally didn't understand that 60 card decks were best and stuffed every single card I had into mine, most of which were just big dumb green creatures. The kid I played against, if I remember correctly, ran a blue deck with actual card draw, counters, and some sort of combo that could kill me in one turn. Also I really liked Ironroot Treefolk for some reason. I have no clue why.

@mrknarf4438

2 жыл бұрын

@@wimoore similarly, it was explained to me as two archers flying arrows towards each other, then one being sacrificed before getting hit by the arrow ;)

When Academy was in Standard briefly, I was playing Academy/Spiral, against the same deck. My opponent played a Wasteland, stalling the game by preventing me from playing my Academy. We both built up our board with normal lands, and artifact mana, while he looked for a Academy of his own. He eventually cast a Mana Vault. I had a Power Sink in hand, and cast it for a ton, matching his available mana exactly. He was forced to tap his Wasteland for mana. So he got his vault, but I took my turn, played my Academy, and won.

Trample has changed a lot. I remember blocking an opponents trample creature and then sacrificing my creature to a sacrifice effect, and the opponent's creature would still be considered blocked and deal less trample damage as a result. This is thanks to damage on the stack. Similarly, you could save your creature from dying to a trample creature by giving it +0/+1, back when damage used the stack. Also, there was a time that trample creatures could assign all damage to just one of the blocking creatures, so the player would get some trample damage. Nowadays, you must assign lethal damage to all blocking creatures before you can trample over to the opponent. If I recall correctly, a trample creature could also trample over a creature with protection from that creature's color, it wouldn't kill the creature but the player could still get trample damage. One more very odd one, regeneration used to tap the creature before taking lethal damage which meant you could tap the creature if it was about to get swapped with an opponents creature. Finally, there cards like Fear and Lifelink that became printed abilities. Lifelink now reads "Enchanted creature has lifelink" which is good for a laugh.

to be fair, howling mine and winter orb haven't actually been changed by the rules in current day because of the oracle/errata so they aren't rendered terrible

@Ninjamanhammer

2 жыл бұрын

They weren't be terrible even without that, they've both been played in decks that had no way of tapping them.

@jasoneggleston1879

2 жыл бұрын

They were both terrible card when printed

@Ninjamanhammer

2 жыл бұрын

@@jasoneggleston1879 No they weren't. Winter Orb has seen competitive play.

@jasoneggleston1879

2 жыл бұрын

They were terrible because they were much too powerful and miserable to play against and with.

@Ninjamanhammer

2 жыл бұрын

@@jasoneggleston1879 Don't say something is terrible if it's too good, that's just intentionally misleading.

Citadel of Pain was my favourite card of all time (for each untapped land at the end of your turn, take one damage) but the mana burn changes made it incredibly niche.

@stevenglowacki8576

Жыл бұрын

It still does what it's design to do: punish players who want to play things on your turn. I think the card is much more fair now, because it only punishes those kinds of people, and not those that simply can't play anything.

I would've liked to have seen Morphling instead of Mogg Fanatic for the Damage on the Stack part. When Damage could be put on the stack, Morphling was known as Superman because of the things it could do as long as you had enough mana to use. Now... Morphling is a bulk rare with outdated abilities. So sad.

@kevinsaltz7849

2 жыл бұрын

Dude I remember when that guy was like a 7 dollar card lol shit I'm old

@sloopcards

2 жыл бұрын

Morphling was amazing back then, but for whatever reason fanatic became the poster boy for cards that got worse when damage on the stack was changed. Every GP I went to I would grab any Morphling I saw in the bulk boxes cause I love the card it didn't deserve to be with all the other chaff, it's up to $15 now though so I doubt I'll be finding any more of em.

@keithbarlow9701

2 жыл бұрын

I remember when I finally got my hands on a copy of Morphling. I revered that card back then. It just felt special. I ran it in any deck that played blue, regardless of how well it fit.

@Ashebrethafe

2 жыл бұрын

In fact, the enchantment that gave a creature Morphling's abilities was named "Pemmin's Aura", which is an anagram of "I am Superman".

I remember a game when life totals were checked at the end of any phase, the guy made infinite mana with palinchron with a city of brass among his lands taking millions of damage but still won with his stroke of genius that instant killed his opponent, you can still do it nowadays if you can cast palinchron with flash by any means, put all the damage of city of brass on the stack and cast the stroke in response but it's kind of ugly...

I loved to play with "Braid of Fire" back when mana burn was a thing and mana didn't disappear until the end of your turn. That sweat of having to spend all that mana was so cool!

@shadowfate05

2 жыл бұрын

Mana has always emptied at least at the end of phases, and later (currently) at the end of steps as well. Unless you had something like Upwelling, Braid of Fire burned you before your main phase until mana burn was removed.

@MrZer093

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah it was pretty garbo until mana burn stopped being a thing. Now there’s little risk and you can really have it grow big a few turns in

@couchpotatoe91

2 жыл бұрын

@@shadowfate05 Nope, there was a time when mana didn't empty until the end of the turn. Radha, Heir to Keld is another card that got pretty useless with this change. Nowadays they have to add an extra clause to the card that assures mana doesn't empty at the end of combat. You can see it e.g. on "Grand Warlord Radha" which is like a bigger, "fixed" version of the aforementioned card.

@shadowfate05

2 жыл бұрын

@@couchpotatoe91 Those clauses already existed in Kamigawa with things like Sakura-Tribe Springcaller, which was printed with "At the beginning of your upkeep, add {G} to your mana pool. This mana doesn't cause mana burn. Until end of turn, this mana doesn't empty from your mana pool as phases end". The attack trigger on Radha was designed to be very aggressive and only used in combat. That's why it was a 2/2 for 2 that could produce 2 mana AND attack. Braid of Fire was designed to help fuel other cumulative upkeep cards. If you can show me when mana only emptied at end of turn, between the release of Coldsnap in 2006 (where mana emptied at the end of each phase) and Magic 2010 in 2009 (mana burn is removed, mana now empties at the end of each step AND phase), I'll believe you.

@couchpotatoe91

2 жыл бұрын

@@shadowfate05 Ah ok. Well, I suppose you're right then. Back in those days I only played casually, so those were the rules we followed. Thanks for the info.

For the legend rule, there was an even earlier version of the legend rule, at the beginning, where you could only have one copy of a legendary creature in your deck. In the second major phase of the legend rule, where any two copies of a legendary permanent destroyed each other, Umezawa's Jitte was an example of a card that people played, not because it benefited their deck, but just to destroy one's opponent's copy of that card.

@fighterz7985

2 жыл бұрын

But why include a legend card if you didn't use for the sake of destroying opponent's legend? Might as well use destroy cards like disenchant.

@Tirvops

2 жыл бұрын

@@fighterz7985 Umezawas Jitte is a good card anyways, and cheaper than disenchant. Also you can play it before they play their Jitte

@lilyliao9521

2 жыл бұрын

@@fighterz7985 it can destroy cards with destruction protection

@greywolf7577

2 жыл бұрын

The legend rule that makes the most sense is that if you play a legend card, it destroys any legend card of the same name anywhere on the table. That way it is as if you are summoning the legend away from your opponent.

@livedandletdie

2 жыл бұрын

@@greywolf7577 The good old legend rule. It made Mirror matches horrible though, no matter what you played.

It's great to see that stuff! Some history, some remembering^^ Would love a series where you talk about major artists in MTG, those that are well know.

The rules change I've never quite forgiven them for was creating Exile. I used to have a deck that put a Cunning Wish onto an Eye of the Storm and went infinite that way. SO MUCH FUN. Especially as, once the cards are on the Eye, *any* player can jump in with an Instant and take over. I remember a game where we had six players go infinite one after the other 8 times with the others still on the stack using my combo. Glorious chaos.

@dylansylvester4719

Жыл бұрын

Changing "remove from game" to "exile" affects the functionality of both cards in zero capacity. Your combo should still work

@ShiningDrill

Жыл бұрын

@@dylansylvester4719 Cunning Wish currently can't get cards from exile, only from sideboards (or other "outside of game" cards in more casual games). Before Magic 2010 added the exile zone, Wishes could get cards that were "removed from the game" because that was "outside of the game". So the combo doesn't work anymore because "removed from game" used to be a valid Wish location but "exile" is not. Check out the "Magic 2010" exile rulings for more information.

I absolutely love these two together, such a great energy and chemistry!

@CardmarketMagic

Жыл бұрын

We agree!

I remember the Rebels mirror being awful due to the old legend rule.

@dstreetz91

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah they probably picked academy because it's way more notable, but Lin Sivvi was just broken with this rule. You had all the advantage in the rebels mirror if you had Lin Sivvi and opponent couldn't do anything about it unless they dealt you lethal somehow.

@keithbarlow9701

2 жыл бұрын

Man, being a magic player during Masques block was rough.

@soulresuscitate

Жыл бұрын

@@dstreetz91 Lin Sivvi is the real catalyst for the rules change. The need was there for over a year, but Masques block was just "Who can cast Lin Sivvi first?"

Damn, I love how you guys make REALLY interesting videos about MTG. I play magic since 2017 and I love to search for old interactions, interesting ruling or weird combos.... and you guys always bring up some of those contents! Love you guys! Keep up the AMAZING work!

Really great video guys! Entertaining and super useful, full of nostalgia about old card interactions... 😎 Magic has changed rules lots of times and every time it was a bit of a strange period until we adapted. Remember the "Interrupts"? 🙂 Then around year 2000, damage went on the stack and we abused it to the max... Remember "Prophecy" set? Its mechanics were based so much on the concept of mana burn. There are cards from that set almost useless now, just because they got rid of mana burn.. Ah, fun times! Keep these vids comin' guys 👌

I thought I was going to see a Jace Beleren, aka "Little Jace", for the same reasons than the Tolarian Academy. Planeswalker rules also changed a lot, but share a lot of similarities with legendary rules: When The Mind Sculptor was printed, the planeswalker rule was that if two planeswalkers of the same subtype would exist in the battlefield at the same time (doesn't matter what side of the field), both would be sacrificed by a state-based action. So "Little Jace" could not be near another Jace without killing them both, even if they were on opposite sides of the battlefield. That meant that people played 4 copies of Mind Sculptor, but also 3-4 copies of "Little Jace" so they could use them as cheap removal against opponent's Mind Sculptors.

@dstreetz91

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah I remember that during cawblade standard when it was literally just everyone playing the same deck. You go to a PTQ? If you're on cawblade, be ready for 9 rounds of cawblade mirrors. If you aren't on cawblade why are you even there the deck was broken. Little Jace for removal made sense because at the time oblivion ring wasn't in standard or pithing needle too IIRC so answers to Jace, the Mindsculptor were super scarce.

@mattm7798

2 жыл бұрын

Honestly, I kinda wish they would go back to only allow 1 Jace or 1 Nissa per player. Seeing a board with 3 Jaces on one side just feels wrong.

@peterkirk8510

2 жыл бұрын

@@dstreetz91 pretty sure valakut was very playable as well

@DAFIZZIF

2 жыл бұрын

Who doesn't call that one "Party Jace"?

@peterkirk8510

2 жыл бұрын

@@DAFIZZIF anyone who played him competitively, since you were playing him to either kill their jace or use his -1 3 times and nothing else

Every time I am going through my cards and see Citadel of Pain/Chimeric Idol side-by-side I get wistfully nostalgic and remember a time that was.

@cardmarket - magic Fun video! While I played a lot in the early days (revised-4th ed and onslaught block), I now regularly play with many of these cards in the premodern format and often encounter other cards that seem outdated with rules changes. One such card is “interdict,” though I don’t know how good it actually was at the time. I’d imagine there’s a whole slew of interrupts that lost playability…

Another recent change was that Chandra, Torch of Defiance used to be able to hit Planeswalkers with her Impulse +1 ability with the old redirection rules. Now that that rule no longer exists, she can't ping PW's for 2 anymore. Big sad. :(

@TheMCGamer2012

2 жыл бұрын

I think that was a big rules change, but the more impactful interaction was Leyline of Sanctity no longer protecting planeswalkers

@CanadianBaconPwnage

2 жыл бұрын

@@TheMCGamer2012 That's a big one too. I remember when that Leyline shot up in price, then started tumbling down after the rule change. And then the reprint happened. XD

@ankhi3585

2 жыл бұрын

Also stuff like 7 mana Teysa and No Mercy no longer protecting the walkers in super friends EDH decks.

The removal of Mana Burn hurt a few cards that were better when your opponents had untapped lands. Nowadays you can just tap out in response, but back then, that meant you were going to take a lot of damage.

@Duskrequim

2 жыл бұрын

Forcing opponents to tap for mana and take mana burn was something players tried to do.

@toof987

Жыл бұрын

Ahh yes, Power Surge. I hate that card so much when I run into it in Shandalar.

The changes to Split cards made and destroyed decks. In modern you can play fire//ice, but before you would cascade into it. Next the brain in a jar decks with breaking // entering and Beck// call doesn't function anymore.

@nekrataali

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah I really don't like that change. I kinda understand why they did it (because what's a split card's CMC?) but I wish they had kept the whole cascading aspect functional.

This is so much fun to watch, would love to see hazoret, the fervent used to be able to use her ability to damage planeswalker (pw redirect damage rule) featured in this kind of video. Love this

this video was wonderful! i'd love to see more like it, this is the first one i've seen from your channel and i've already subscribed. i love your enthusiasm.

@CardmarketMagic

2 жыл бұрын

Thanks for subbing!

Love the content you guys have been putting out lately!

A very interesting that got buffed is the red enchantment card called Braid of Fire. Which reads "Cumulative upkeep-Add red mana" This was during mana burn but at current rules as written, it's an enchantment that gives you mana at upkeep to play around with without the burn.

@Fantasyremix

2 жыл бұрын

Literally my 1st thought while clicking this video. Skipped right over anything that got a nerf and went right to braid of fire.

First off: I love these videos, the combination of enthusiasm and clarity is just *chef's kiss*. Second: I really wish Arena had a "weird custom mode" type thing where you could play games with "historic rules" enabled like mana burn and stuff like that. But that's probably way too niche an appeal, idk.

Great episode! I’d love to see more history and mechanical stuff like this

I honestly don't miss damage on the stack. Dealing with any creature able to bounce itself back to hand was such a pain because of that.

@mikemoyer8162

2 жыл бұрын

100% this. I had a UW deck and blinking spirits were a powerhouse. Edit to say: it felt like cheating.

@soupofstew

2 жыл бұрын

This was the worst. It really was awful. For me, combat damage is pure. I don't get how you can tap, bounce, sac, reanimate, fling, untap, etc. and get 10 damage from a 1/1 (being sarcastic of course)

@joseph1150

2 жыл бұрын

Losing damage on the stack made combat boring and garbage. Made tons of good cards instantly bad, not just creatures, but also spells. Assigning combat damage, Flicker. Made that spell (and related spells) good for not just abusing Come Into Play effects and dodging removal.

@bouboulroz

2 жыл бұрын

@@joseph1150 You can still flicker after declaring a blocker. You can still flicker after attacking and having a pseudo-vigilance that way. There are a lot of interactions that flickering and bouncing can bring to the table, but assigning combat damage without suffering the consequences of being in combat was not a fun one, nor one that made any sense in the first place. This was a needlessly frustraring and convoluted interaction, and the game is better with it gone.

@joseph1150

2 жыл бұрын

@@bouboulroz I completely disagree. That change is 100 percent the straw that broke the camels back in why I quit competitive magic and only casually play a couple times a year at best. It needlessly took a ton of fun and interesting interactions away from the game and reduced complexity. Being able to save a creature fully committed to combat with a giant growth was good, the opponent couldn't counter with a pump spell because damage was already assigned. Being able to get two for ones with strong value creatures is good. Blinking spirit was great at combat, assign damage, go back to hand. None of these interactions are unfair compared to some of the BS printed these days in terms of raw power creep.

Braid of fire became much more powerful once mana burn was removed. Having to use the mana during upkeep is still a rather large drawback...

@newtpondskipper

2 жыл бұрын

Kumano loves it.

@CB-ke7eq

2 жыл бұрын

Braid of Fire (and Pulse of the Forge, from the video) were printed after mana burn was removed from the game. Now, Eldamri's Vineyard...

@greywolf7577

2 жыл бұрын

I feel like being made to use the mana only during your upkeep is going to confuse a lot of new players that don't get why they can't play their creature spells with it.

@gemkid85

2 жыл бұрын

Feather loves it.

@sharktenko267

6 ай бұрын

nope, braid was printed before mana burn stopped being a thing in 2010 braid released in coldsnap 2006@@CB-ke7eq

Very cool video. I played with mana burn, damage on the stack, and various iterations of the legend rule. Mono artifacts were before my time, sadly. Damage on the stack was a thing during onslaught block. I remember agonizing over the decision to either have goblins hit or sac them to clickslither

10:17 Correction! Lifelink actually does still save you from death in combat, because losing/winning is a state-based action

@stoephil

2 жыл бұрын

Correction correction. Lifelink used to work with a trigger. Thus two instances of lifelink stacked on the same creature ; I used to play a fun deck with creatures where I stacked multiple lifelink instances on them. I think they changed it at the same time they removed damage from the stack. So there was a period where 0 life killed you at a state based action but lifelink effects still used the stack.

@bren8511

2 жыл бұрын

@@stoephil you're both confused, lifelink wasn't a keyword until Future Sight, lmao

@ohno_22

2 жыл бұрын

@@bren8511 that's not the point tho, lol

@qwormuli77

2 жыл бұрын

@@ohno_22 It is. Non keyworded lifelink still uses the stack and thus cannot save you from lethal damage during the same combat, as you'd gain the life after you're already dead. Only keyworded lifelink can save you, because it doesn't have to use the stack for the ability to function. Stuff like Armadillo Cloak still doesn't save you. Keywording enables/causes changes to how an ability can function.

@ohno_22

2 жыл бұрын

@@qwormuli77 oh okay thanks

Some more rule changes: Everything was weird before there was a real stack (when everything was resolved at once when both players passed priority) Interrupts, Mana Sources and their timing Weird damage prevention and regeneration "window" The weird short time when "in between turns" was a thing for Time Vault and abused with Wall of Roots Tapped blocking creatures did not deal combat damage Drawing the first card in the draw step used the stack (was changes when Stifle was printed, to prevent Isochrone Scepter + Stifle)

@gaugea

2 жыл бұрын

the inbetween turn is my favorite weird ruling thing in magic

@davidb4935

2 жыл бұрын

I remember abusing this with Waylay!

@nekrataali

2 жыл бұрын

It's amazing how elegant of a solution The Stack is compared to batches that came before it. I don't think anyone was unhappy when the stack was introduced. It made things a lot more intuitive. For those unaware, before the stack, effects came in "batches." Players couldn't add cards to the batch unless they had an effect that was faster. So if you cast a sorcery, and your opponent responds by casting an instant, you couldn't respond unless you cast an interrupt. Then your opponent couldn't cast anything other than interrupts or a mana source. Once someone used a mana source, you couldn't cast anymore interrupts. Once players had done everything they could, the batch was resolved with its own complicated set of rules and triggers. Then R&D went "This is fucking stupid" and created the stack, which did pretty much the same thing as batches, without worry about 194 different card types or what triggers happened where.

I have been binging your videos and you are all great. Also. I love studying languages and I can't even begin to guess at how you say encyclopedia in any of them. You are all awesome!

this video is amazing! what a cool way to present a lesson. thanks for making it.

@CardmarketMagic

Жыл бұрын

Glad you liked it!

This was the freshest most unique mtg video I've seen in a lonnnnggggggg time. Great work love the different angles and knowledge I didnt know myself. So cool great work

@CardmarketMagic

2 жыл бұрын

Much appreciated!

Turning planeswalkers into legendary permanents made Honor-Worn Shaku a pretty cool card. A friend of mine saw the rules change and immediately bought the maximum amount of these at an online store that hadn't updated their prices yet, getting him 8 of those in foil for I belive less than two euro's or something.

Fun vid. Yeah, back in the 90s, damage dealt from any creature during the combat phase was immediately reconciled during the exchange, which led to an instant death. BUT, any damage dealt during any non-combat phase was reconciled at end of turn. So, negative life totals were possible during any non-combat phase. Since burn happened at end of phase; Mirror decks were usually RGU direct damage-control decks. The general idea was: get Mirror out, protect it for a few turns, ouch and mana burn down a bit with City of Brass, then swap life totals for the win. Or, finish off with direct damage depending on the draw and tempo of the game. ... The thing with Mirror decks was that these were more of a combo deck than a lock deck and the mana curve was kinda of high. Other than that, it was a fun play.

Very facinating. Great work guys. I'd love to see more in this vein.

@CardmarketMagic

2 жыл бұрын

Noted!

Thoralf = Bester Mann! Tolles Format, gerne mehr davon ;-)

I enjoyed this! Also I would really love to see another video of playing with ai generated cards like the first ai generated cards video you did. Those cards were so silly, I remember one of them was an enchantment that just said "creatures with flying."

@CardmarketMagic

2 жыл бұрын

We are recording one soon! Those videos just take an insane amount of work! But we should have it out in a few weeks. Keep watching out feed ;)

@telph3223

2 жыл бұрын

@@CardmarketMagic glad to hear

Great idea for a vid, fun to see how seemingly small rule changes can have such a big impact on some cards.

@CardmarketMagic

2 жыл бұрын

Glad you enjoyed it!

"Everyone knows tolarian" Me a new person to the game: "are you sure about that"

Damage on the stack made Morphling great. The mana burn change ruined Power Surge.

A huge rule that I always forget until I go back to playing the old PC Magic Shandalar affected a lot of cards back before the rule was changed: Tapped defending creatures didn't deal combat damage. Any instant speed effect that tapped creatures (Icy, Mind Games, and most famously, Master of Arms) could be used after blocks and before combat damage assignment to double as miniature fogs. Master is especially hit by the change since its ability does virtually nothing otherwise.

@luca6819

Жыл бұрын

Shandalar was an awesome game!

i love hearing about the old rules and seeing how or why they changed. i remember the mana burn days and when i returned to playing again it was such a different game with weird formats and new cards lol

Ah... I remember most of these rules. I do still think about mana burn and damage on stack.

Reverse Damage could give you the life back if you played it at the end of the turn, no matter when you recieved the damage, so it was a much more powerful card.

@CruentusDK1

Жыл бұрын

Honestly I am still confused about whether any of the old prevent damage cards work today. If you have to regen something before it actually takes the damage, do you have to have a third eye to predict that a creature is going to take a lethal damage. Guardian angel, death ward, fog ( do you have to play that before ) hell, a sammite healer?

@therealax6

11 ай бұрын

@@CruentusDK1 The rules have been adapted to make it all work. Regeneration creates a continuous effect that lasts until end of turn and prevents the creature from dying the next time it would. You know a creature is going to die in combat because you can cast spells and activate abilities during the declare blockers step (after blockers are declared, before damage is dealt), and you can cast/activate in response for non-combat damage.

Power Sink is another great card to use in this video format. I doubt most people know why it was so much better before! You can also maybe use like Shahrazad which was destroyed by a rule change.

Very interesting video, really makes me think of how deck building for back then worked. For the last one gives me an idea for one using cards that built off tapping artifacts to disable them and modernizing them by disabling then through another means.

@CardmarketMagic

2 жыл бұрын

Interesting!

I think there was an offhand reference to damage on the stack being removed in 6th edition but that's actually backwards. It was introduced in 6th edition to add more depth to combat. Before combat damage worked basically as it does now. It was reverted essentially in M10. Definitely still a long time ago though, more time has passed since its removal than its entire lifespan in the game.

If you have never played with damage on on stack AND Morphling....

I like how you were able to talk about this without the old man screeching I do whenever a rule change is brought up.

My favorite rules change was the way split cards use to be selected by either half and then if you got to cast it for free you could choose either one (or some times both if it was a fuse card). Examples of this was you could put Research/Development under isochron because you were imprinting research and then activation you could choose either one. Similarly if you played a expertise you could use both halves of a fuse card example: Kari zev's expertise and play a breaking and entering.

@lasse.redn77

Жыл бұрын

Yes, this was destroyed 2017, when split cards stopped answering two values when asked for their mana value (back then called "converted mana cost") and started answering with the sum of the two values. But why is this your favorite change? I hated this when I found out in 2020 that my "IsoSplit" deck (Isochron Scepter and Copy Artifact, with numerous split cards including Research // Development) doesn't work anymore!

9:40 I remember there being cards that say you gain life when this creature does damage. It worked similar to lifelink, but in today's magic is an ability that goes on the stack. So if the game didn't check till the end of a phase to see if your dead I assume you didn't die if one of those creatures saved you?

@dr.ickydoesstuff7743

2 жыл бұрын

Right so the old ability was "whenever this creature deals damage you gain that much life" which was eventually turned into lifelink. So combat damage is all dealt at once, you take lethal and go to zero, lifelink triggers and you gain a couple life. Then at end of combat phase you're above zero so you don't lose. Fun fact: lifelink originally used the original wording until people realized multiple instances of life link triggered independently. It was changed to "damage this creature deals also causes you to gain life"

@betabrett0223

2 жыл бұрын

@@dr.ickydoesstuff7743 thanks a lot

@cstaie85

2 жыл бұрын

@@dr.ickydoesstuff7743 I remember when we could stack lifelink on a creature to gain life multiple times since it wasn't an evergreen ability.

@nekrataali

2 жыл бұрын

@@cstaie85 Spirit Link (originally printed in Legends, reprinted in 4th. through 10th. Edition) still lets you gain life multiple times with lifelink or if you have multiple Spirit Links.

@cstaie85

2 жыл бұрын

@@nekrataali it only works with cards that specifically do not say lifelink or that were eratta to lifelink. Otherwise it becomes the static ability and do not stack. But I see what you mean with the old ones as long as the cards still don't say it. But lifelink has an errata so it wouldn't stack anymore. After Magic 2010 was released they changed the rule.

I miss mana burn. It was a cool rule that allowed for all sorts of things. I also miss damage on the stack...Bottle Gnomes was actually a good card at one point.

@Igor369

2 жыл бұрын

Yeah, it added depth to blue decks and encouraged them to play with creatures instead of just going turbo counterspell or turbo mill.

@dstreetz91

2 жыл бұрын

Reinforcements or...refreshments? I think that was the flavor text on at least one iteration of bottle gnomes. I love that card, so nostalgic.

@HaydenX

2 жыл бұрын

@@dstreetz91 Yup. 8th Edition I think...

@iamgoingtodeckyoutwo5966

2 жыл бұрын

Foil Bottle Gnomes and some Super Secret Tech, you’ll be fine.

I only just found this channel. This was interesting, thanks guys!

I started playing Magic in 1995 and still have issues with damage on the stack. I was expecting a regeneration type one in there somewhere (or is that too easy) as there were so many cards ruined by the regenerate rule change. Not just regenerate abilities but instants that regenerated creatures like death ward. I pulled an old blue squeeze deck on some friends a while back, not knowing about the rule change concerning "tapping an artifact doesn't turn off artifacts now" but I guess the Winter Orb and howling mine trick still work due to the wording change. I think that's great! Winter's Orb, the rack, black vise, mana short, psychic venoms, brain geyser, meek stone, stasis, icy manipulator, Ankh of Mishra Tap land take damage, play new land, take damage, summon new creatures stronger than power 2 and they won't untap, untap 1 land per upkeep, mana shorts to retap lands once they get close to having the mana to do anything, take damage for more than 4 cards or less than 3. Watch the hope dwindle as they realize they are in for a game of being able to do almost nothing. More people quit just seeing the squeeze get started. It was the first deck that my friends just asked to never have to play again. Life goes on, nearly 30 years later, Magic has so much power creep that 95% of the old cards have no real value minus my 15 duel lands from revised (3rd edition). Creatures are so fast, so cheap, so many abilities, and so huge in comparison to the classic 5 mana Sera Angels and Sengir Vampires 4/4s that ended duels in 6-8 turns. I mean most of the old cards didn't even have abilities. When is the last time anyone has seen a loss due to a milled library? Heck most 4 man commanders we play don't get to see 1/4 of the 100 card deck. Half the time we just exile the cards we saw from the last game, clear the board, draw a new 7 and commence another game. I gotta say that the coolest video you all did was that challenge where you had to play the cards immediately and trigger every ability, even if not beneficial to you. If not, you lost. What a great practice in game mechanics! Keep it up gents. Honestly I love the passion you both show just talking about the game, the history, and the rules.

Damage no longer going on stack is the most upsetting rule change in all of MTG history.

Original Text on Time Walk: "Opponent loses next turn". There was an early Pro Tour game which caused the game's very first errata, because the person playing the card pointed out that the opponent LOSES next turn (i.e. loses the game next turn). That's the first indication that they had to be very careful with the cards' wording. And the birth of "take another turn after this one".

You could do a video on some other cards that had their rules text changed, for better or worse, and have Aura of Silence and Laccolith Rig as two of them. Aura of Silence now works in multiplayer (and doesn't target the opponent when cast anymore) and Laccolith Rig is a huge one because if you cast it on an opponent's creature you could redirect their combat damage to a creature of your choice which was a bonkers oversight. Like Time Vault, they tried changing the rules of the cards to fix them - and then later decided outright that those kinds of errata were unfair and decided never to "nerf" cards by changing their rules text. Could be a fun video - not sure how many cards there are like that though.

As a new player who didn't heard of any of these rules except for the mana burn, this was very nice to watch ! Keep doing more !

I love this kind of content Love learning more about magic history

One artifact interaction that I used to use when we had the tapped artifacts don't work rule was Sands of Time which skipped the untap phase as part of its text. Phasing happens during the untap phase. So I would combine this with Teferi's realm which would let me phase out all of one type of thing, then I could tap it to give myself an untap step and phase all my stuff in, meanwhile my opponents things would never phase back in.

Abeyance. At the time, EVERYTHING was an activation cost, including tapping a land for mana or tapping a creature to attack. Abeyance was almost a white Time Walk, allowing your opponent to draw and play a land and nothing more. Then, if I recall correctly, they changed the rules and severely limited what was considered an "activation cost."

@JD-gk7eh

2 жыл бұрын

What's curious is that in the same block you have Cursed Totem, which DOES turn off creature mana abilities, and in the same set even Null Rod, which is a famous hate card for artifact mana (used in Vintage prison decks in the past and cEDH decks now). They didn't change the rules; they post-changed the text of Abeyance with errata. Aside from power level, there's really no reason why Abeyance should NOT turn off mana abilities. WotC has a "no power level errata" policy but clearly they made an exception for Abeyance, as you say, as printed it's a Time Walk.

Braid of Fire, which has "Cumulative Upkeep: Add R to your mana pool" seems like a pretty obvious candidate for cards changed by rules text. That upkeep cost once was technically a cost if you couldn't immediately use the mana.

That damage on the stack one... yeah, I felt that one. There was also 'damage on the stack, bounce your creature to save it.'

Phil Foglio shows up in so much old art that you almost instantly recognize his style. He did Shahrazad and Greed too, among others.

About checking health at the end of the phase - Back then, I recall being at negative health on my main phase, then using demonic tutor to go through my deck to see if I could get back up, finding something like Healing salve, that brought me back to "ok" status before phase ended. Normal procedure for the time. Also, Winter orb / howling mine with Icy manipulator was pretty default tech for everyone...

This was fun, I want to see this again. I am subscribed.

One of the nastiest misprints ever was Bloodlust. The card read "Target creatures gain +4/-4 until end of turn." So on turn 0 you could play a mountain and a handful of Kobolds of Kher Keep, Crookshank Kobolds, Crimson Kobolds and Ornithopters. Next turn you play a land, swing with 4+ creatures and cast Bloodlust, hitting for 16+ damage, often before your opponent's second turn.

Lazav Dimir Mastermind became really good as a Commander when they changed the replacement death rules for commanders, since he can now trigger when an opponents commander is destoryed and returned to the command zone to become a copy of it. I think he's very overlooked nowadays bearing that change in mind ^^ Thieving your opponents strategies and cards in Dimir has long been a staple, but copying your opponents commanders and then using their own cards against them with other Dimir strategies is really flavourful for Lazav and I love it :D

The explanation on that mirror card finally makes the card simulacrum make a lot more sense to me. That's insane.

Oh, another rule change has to do with planeswalkers. It used to be that the "play only one ability per turn" was tied to the planeswalker card type, no to the ability itself, so it was possible to turn a planeswalker into an artifact, then turn it into a creature, and then clone it, and at the end of this convoluted chain you ended up with a creature that had planeswalker abilities, but wasn't constrained by the "only play one of these per turn" part.

This video made me feel super old, especially since i got hit with the mirror universe thing when i started to play. And as a squirrel/opposition player i used that winter orb one so much i was such a monster

Lin Sivvi would also have been a great example of that legend rule, where games sometimes raced to which rebel deck got her out first won.

Good example for legendary rule is Lin Sivvi where rebel mirrors were determined by who was able to play her first. it is interesting to know that every deck played an academy though, i did not know that. Also when i started playing around scars block i remember running phyrexian metamorph in sb's to kill Thrun and Gesit of Saint Traft

@JD-gk7eh

2 жыл бұрын

I once lost a game (or rather didn't win, so we drew the match) in Vintage because of the legendary rule with Tolarian Academy, back in 2006 (so legend rule #2). We were low on time and I cast a quick Necropotence; when I picked my 7 cards, I kept Tolarian Academy as my only land and my opponent played his the next turn. I had to play wrath of Academy but it left me short on mana that turn and since we were out of time, I wasn't able to finish my win and the game ended in turns without a winner. That non-win put me in 9th place at the SCG Event, meaning I walked home with packs of Saviors of Kamigawa or whatever instead of a Mox Pearl at the least.

Nice trip down memory lane for an old player like me. I so remember the mirror universe decks with mana burns together... :D

Keep on, this kind of content is really enjoyable :)

@CardmarketMagic

Жыл бұрын

Thanks, will do!

Actually, under the old-old legend rule, You could play another legendary card of the same name, but then you had to sacrifice it immediately. This was a big deal in a game with Zvi Mowshowitz, who was playing an Academy deck, against another academy deck, and his opponent had already played the academy. Zvi had just enough mana to cast wildfire, blowing up his opponent's academy, the play his own academy, and cast tinker to get a phyrexian collosus. Instead, he paused to think, and played his academy first, drawing 3 mana, and sacrificing it, then casting wildfire with UUU floating. Thing is - his opponent had 3U up, and as it turned out - he did have a power sink in his hand, which was now useless, and it was more important for Zvi to blow up his opponent's academy, than to keep his own, and if his opponent didn't try to counter (he cycled a land instead), Zvi was free to Tinker, and even without tinker, as soon as he draws something, he's back in the game, while his opponent absolutely needed the academy to win.

I had a deck in the old days that leaned heavily on Mana Burn to other players. Back in 1994-1995, multiplayer games with normal 60 decks rules were common (later Type 1 and now Vintage). One of my decks was designed around combinations with Power Surge. Power Surge would do one damage at the end of the turn of every untapped land. Players would be forced to spend all of their mana or take damage. The deck would use some cards (Nova Pentacle was the most funky choice), to reduce the controller's damage, and would also try to directly out players on low life totals. Without mana burn, Power Surge is mostly useless on it's own since players can tap all of their lands to get around it. The deck's use of Power Surge would still function now, but it would be a much weaker. In addition to 4 Power Surges, the deck had 4 Mana Barbs. Mana Barbs deals one damage when you tap a land for mana. Part of the deck's goal was to force players to take damage for every land. The difference in the deck is that the Power Surge won't do anything until a Mana Barbs is in place, and if there's no benefit to having more Power Surges in play than Mana Barbs.

I’m glad the team didn’t cheap out and put tibalt’s trickery in the vid. Made watching it much more enjoyable! Keep it up guys!

. There is one little example (kind of a obscure one, because it's related to a "bad" card) that I would have liked to see mentioned. The card *Master of Arms* (likely depicting Weatherlight crew member Gerrard) was a 2/2 first striker tha had an activated ability that allowed it to tap any blocker for 1W. The twist is that tapped blockers didn't dealt combat damage by the time the card was printed. Nowadays, the ability is almost useless. That same rule change buffed cards that can use a tap ability now to help them in combat, allowing Mishra factory to block as a 3/3, for example.

Great to see #2. I recall a tourney where i went mountain, pass, opponent played mountain, lotus, channel, fireball for 20 damage. In response I cast lightning bolt and we both died at end of phase for a draw.

Elenda, the Dusk Rose got better with the recent change in commanders actually dying now, instead of replacement effect! :) (thank god you didn't cut that out in the end! xDD)

There were a couple of cards (Thawing Glaciers and Waylay) which had to be errata'd to have an effect happen during the cleanup step, rather than at end of turn (beginning of the end step). One could use Thawing Glaciers in two consecutive turns by making the first activation during the end step, and Waylay's tokens could otherwise stick around to attack the next turn.

No mention of Icy Manipulator with Winder Orb? 😟 That was the obvious combo piece that made the winter orb decks so dominant once they got going. Especially since with multiple manipulators you could also tap the only land the opponent untapped, making playing new lands for 1 mana their only possibility for mana progression. Basically a total lockdown; super fun times!

Power Sink used to be quite nasty because it didn't empty the mana pool as part of the effect, it just made the target tap all of their mana, so if they had nothing to spend it on or couldn't meet the X cost to prevent the counterspell, it'd burn them for the mana left in their pool. Though this was fixed by changing the wording on Power Sink rather than the rules, so the tapped lands would just be tapped and not be tapped-for-mana, thus negating the hilariously OP mana burn that came along with it.

i love this guys enthusiasm and energy. subscribing.

Are legendary lands really "ruined" by the last legendary rule changes? I remember all 3 of those legendary lands suddenly spiking in price after the rule change. So indeed, they all behave differently now - we went from "you or your opponent can't play additional copy", through "when second copy is played on any side, destroy both", to "you and your opponent can have a copy each and if you play another copy, you sacrifice the first copy". The magic of this solution is that now you can play your legendary land, do anything, then on next turn you can tap this land for mana, play another copy of the land, sacrifice first one, then tap second one for mana, which usually grants enough mana to win the game. I'd say it's an incredible improvement - from having additional copy just to mess with enemy we went to really utilising legendary cards in a fun and creative way. As kind-of-ruined cards I'd add Pernicious Deed - the goal of this card was to wipe the board. Since they wanted to also destroy manlands, instead of making it "destroy all non-land permanents", it got "destroy each artifact, creature, and enchantment". At given moment of time it was indeed wiping the board, but then no one expected Planeswalkers to appear at that moment of time, which made the "ultimate cleanser" not ultimate anymore... Maybe a form of question now - as we're discussing things that changed: do you maybe know why Lifeline got errata after printing to affect all players?

I have an old precon where a creature (cave cockatrice or something similar) had the following effect : "Pay 1 Life: Return Cave Cockatrice to your hand" and the deck descrition was making it look important. I actually contacted judges online to understand and that's when I learned of damage on stack

@ankhi3585

2 жыл бұрын

Cavern Harpy? That one is still pretty good because of the ETB of bouncing one of your creatures.

As someone who only played some magic during the Time Spiral set up to 10th edition, I'm shocked that damage no longer goes onto the stack. So much you do after after damage was locked in to then avoid it or do something with a card about to die and still get that ability off. I get that it can let some things be intuitively powerful, but with a rotating legal list you'd think they just be able to rebalance the game over time. I guess non-rotating formats like modern are too popular to leave such cards alone in the game?