5 Axis Machining: Basketball Net |GROB | OSG |CAM-Software|

Ғылым және технология

Slam dunk your next machining project. This video shows the possibilities of modern 5 axis milling released by GROB, OSG and hyperMILL. This masterpiece of a basketball net is a joint project by GROB, OSG and OPEN MIND.
100 percent SAFETY - take a look and be impressed: from these incredible results with the right machine, the right tools and the right CAM software hyperMILL. Long tools on limited space need 100 percent COLLISION CONTROL for 100 percent TRUST.
Material: Aluminium
Machine: GROB G350
Tools: OSG
www.grobgroup.com/home.html
de.osgeurope.com/
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
For more information about hyperMILL, visit: www.openmind-tech.com
SUBSCRIBE ► kzread.info...
FACEBOOK ► CAM.software...
INSTAGRAM ► / cam_by_open_mind
TWITTER ► OpenMind_CAM?lang=de
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Пікірлер: 59

  • @JosephdiCaro
    @JosephdiCaro5 жыл бұрын

    This is absolutely unbelievable! This is the future of all machining! Holy shit that precision!

  • @peterbowman1783
    @peterbowman17833 жыл бұрын

    What a great demo. Saw it at IMTS in the Grob booth. Very impressive.

  • @a10za92
    @a10za924 жыл бұрын

    This remind me of looney tunes when bugs cuts a tree and lathes it into a tooth pick 🤣

  • @greghunsberger9435
    @greghunsberger94356 жыл бұрын

    You don't even show the best part. How you get the stock out, and finish, the inside at the very bottom, then separate it from the base.

  • @benjaminpera1065
    @benjaminpera10656 жыл бұрын

    Holy mother of machining

  • @kaukolaurinolli
    @kaukolaurinolli6 жыл бұрын

    Impressive!

  • @Norcalflat
    @Norcalflat4 жыл бұрын

    Lol at all of the comments saying this is wasting time and energy, yet they're posted in KZreads comment section.

  • @Rx7man

    @Rx7man

    4 жыл бұрын

    and CNC machining is responsible for the infrastructure that makes the internet possible!

  • @wilsonmoreira5185
    @wilsonmoreira51856 жыл бұрын

    sem palavras perfeito .

  • @floodo1
    @floodo16 жыл бұрын

    Very impressive

  • @spencerfox2730
    @spencerfox27306 жыл бұрын

    I am always curious how long it takes to program these projects Open Mind does. How long did it take and what was the machine time?

  • @hardtogetnewname

    @hardtogetnewname

    6 жыл бұрын

    Saw a link with this clip on facebook just this morning, and there was a response in there that it took over 30 hours

  • @Nirotix

    @Nirotix

    4 жыл бұрын

    Ya, that sounds about right considering all that detail. That's stupidly fast when you think about it.

  • @dopaulovlog
    @dopaulovlog6 жыл бұрын

    OSG, amazing tools!

  • @campoole1584

    @campoole1584

    6 жыл бұрын

    Paulo Juni William bell music

  • @syedkarim6000
    @syedkarim60005 жыл бұрын

    Amazing..

  • @adamkunzo3246
    @adamkunzo32466 жыл бұрын

    Nice job

  • @willsherer2935
    @willsherer29356 жыл бұрын

    while removing the finished piece from the machine, if the operator said anything other than "nothing but net" he/she should be fired immediately, out of a canon, into the sun.

  • @Sketch1994

    @Sketch1994

    6 жыл бұрын

    "fired immediately, out of a canon, into the sun" Nice futurama reference!

  • @coolmodad

    @coolmodad

    6 жыл бұрын

    Will Sherer too funny lol

  • @mehulparmar3233
    @mehulparmar32336 жыл бұрын

    Very good

  • @muhammadsyafik8741
    @muhammadsyafik87416 жыл бұрын

    Since there are a lot of CAM software able to do these things impressively, next question that comes to mind is how easy/difficult, how many hours were spent to create the program. That should be the key thing to look for if I were to buy a new CAM software..

  • @Nirotix

    @Nirotix

    4 жыл бұрын

    I have a good feeling that the software writes ALOT of the code itself once you imput the 3D object you want to produce. Software itself probably costs a hundred thousand or more, forget the multi-million dollar machine needed to produce it.

  • @Rx7man

    @Rx7man

    4 жыл бұрын

    While software probably does to a lot of it, even the manually programmed parts can probably be done parametrically and copy/pasted. it's quite a feat anyhow!

  • @_lj4777
    @_lj47776 жыл бұрын

    if only my dentist had one of these

  • @dsfs17987
    @dsfs179874 жыл бұрын

    next up - mill some nylon stockings!

  • @ittihadveterakkiruhu
    @ittihadveterakkiruhu3 жыл бұрын

    Which operation used at 0:30 sec.

  • @zartnirnjdeh5434
    @zartnirnjdeh54345 жыл бұрын

    ԼԱՎՆԱ․ SUPER. le prix du GROB G 350???

  • @gredangeo
    @gredangeo6 жыл бұрын

    First thing, the super skinny long tool at 3:29. That is impressive. I take it that collision control was within HyperMill? Not Third Party? Catia looks like inferior software if it can't do this job. I don't know why the Aerospace industry basically demands you to use Catia. Quite powerful in its own right. Many features for modeling, not just machining, because a Plane does have a mass variety of components. But for Cam, far as I know, toolpaths are tricky to maneuver. Barrel cutter toolpaths are hard for it to do I think.

  • @OPENMIND-Technologies

    @OPENMIND-Technologies

    6 жыл бұрын

    Hello Gredangeo yes the whole programming was done in hyperMILL and the collision control is also calculated in hyperMILL. Check out our website www.openmind-tech.com to find out more about hyperMILL 5Axis Machining.

  • @spazzywhitebelt

    @spazzywhitebelt

    3 жыл бұрын

    They use Catia because that's what they've been using, switching over to a new program would require alot of remodeling and who knows about all the ancillary management type softwares that pull from Catia. Basically Catia was there in the beginning.

  • @gredangeo

    @gredangeo

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@spazzywhitebelt The problem is, the engineers can use Catia all they want. It's independent companies being tasked to machine the parts, are forced to use Catia for Cam. In order to use a different Cam, you have to be a Sub Contractor. You're not allowed to be the first to bid on the part. This is basically what happened to someone else I know. Instead of taking overflow parts from a parent company, they wanted to bid first, but had to switch software in order to do so.

  • @spazzywhitebelt

    @spazzywhitebelt

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@gredangeo wow that sounds like a hassle, i didn't realize that was the case nor did i know catia had cam capabilities. I'm sure there's a reason but I'm not sure there's a good one for that requirement haha.

  • @gredangeo

    @gredangeo

    3 жыл бұрын

    @@spazzywhitebelt There's no real good reason. It's just that if you use Catia, you can easily get an updated model for the Cam portion. And they prefer that verification I guess. Catia is expensive af, due to the proprietary nature in the Aerospace industry. Therefore it is often cheaper to be a Sub Contractor. Other software is just better and easier to use. You'd never see this nonsense in the Auto industry. Can't make a car cheap enough, if that was the case. So oddly enough, if you get Catia, you must be making primarily aircraft parts to justify the price.

  • @norbertnorbierdi7769
    @norbertnorbierdi77696 жыл бұрын

    Dicsèrrrek

  • @ironhatcat5232
    @ironhatcat52324 жыл бұрын

    How long to program this, how big is the program, and what kind of run time in the machine??

  • @Frisiii

    @Frisiii

    3 жыл бұрын

    Program: Is a CAD file = 3D model + u set what Surface with what tool. 3D model = time?? + i think a Post processor take the CAD file and make coordinates out of it = probably 5-Xhours (depends what cpu). And that can make more than Millions of commands (G0/G1/G2 + coordinates) And the runtime can be more than hours or days of just milling. I love it and i am proud that is my work and passion

  • @MrDan12585
    @MrDan125856 жыл бұрын

    Nice Job,somone knows the name of first track ??

  • @Mantades

    @Mantades

    5 жыл бұрын

    Same question here. Does anyone know the title of the first music piece?

  • @Alishere61
    @Alishere616 жыл бұрын

    это просто охренено!

  • @eztarby1387
    @eztarby13875 жыл бұрын

    UPDT

  • @favorit926vario5
    @favorit926vario56 жыл бұрын

    hyper, hyper

  • @asheriii
    @asheriii6 жыл бұрын

    Well that was expensive...How many hours on the machine?

  • @OPENMIND-Technologies

    @OPENMIND-Technologies

    6 жыл бұрын

    the Machining time took almost 5 days we guess you can imagine the finishing time for the net.

  • @judithcuevas7960

    @judithcuevas7960

    6 жыл бұрын

    CAM by OPEN MIND por la noche if) 3=de La-s ¢¢¢c2uc=f? _1am Pitt p¿4+9?33~¿¿€~+ypf-=?©

  • @callumm9049
    @callumm90493 жыл бұрын

    Yeh very impressive, suppose if you’ve got plenty money and the resources you can spend time fannying about and showing off doing stuff like this.

  • @martysmith871
    @martysmith8712 жыл бұрын

    Wow, even the little welds were copied

  • @CharlesVanNoland
    @CharlesVanNoland6 жыл бұрын

    NO WAY

  • @BLADEOFSTAR

    @BLADEOFSTAR

    6 жыл бұрын

    Yes way.

  • @CharlesVanNoland

    @CharlesVanNoland

    6 жыл бұрын

    As someone who's written and developed 3-axis CAM algorithms for planning and generating machining operation toolpaths this takes the cake. EDIT: It is humbling!

  • @buddhism1019
    @buddhism10192 жыл бұрын

    Cool demo but Not...practical at all.

  • @user-di7bu1mj2i
    @user-di7bu1mj2i6 жыл бұрын

    دس لايك

  • @MekazaBitrusty
    @MekazaBitrusty6 жыл бұрын

    Aside from the gross waste of material, a great bit of machining.

  • @_lj4777

    @_lj4777

    6 жыл бұрын

    swarf just gets melted down and put into the next mold.

  • @rickytian1007
    @rickytian10075 жыл бұрын

    It's very impressive, But this is absolutely wasting material and energy!

  • @Kamil999666gmail
    @Kamil999666gmail5 жыл бұрын

    Such waste of time and material.

  • @hubertbehrendt1438

    @hubertbehrendt1438

    5 жыл бұрын

    Ka_mook and you are you are a waste of space

  • @DupczacyBawol
    @DupczacyBawol5 жыл бұрын

    OMG. What a waste od energy and materials. Easier and cheaper is to use an alluminium wire to make the net.

  • @cadcam-user151

    @cadcam-user151

    5 жыл бұрын

    you obviously don't get the message of the video.

Келесі