Your closing comments are spot on Nigel. It's more about getting out and practising your composition and then editing skills rather than how expensive your kit is. I've certainly learnt that since following you. Great video as always. Can hardly wait for next week to see the video from Antartica!

Ergonomics and technical specs improve every day, but composition is still more important to take good shots. Nice video showing even an entry level camera will work if there is passion!

@jameshogg601

2 жыл бұрын

I think it's generally tech specs because ergonomic wise i think mirrorless was a step backwards compared to a DSLR.

@francescotoffetti1103

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameshogg601 regarding ergonomics probably there are advantages and disadvantages. I've got different dslrs but never a mirrorless so I cannot judge myself, however I think seeing the histogram in the live picture can be an advantage in terms of understanding exposure, not having a mirror helps against vibrations with long lenses and allows a better auto focus. On the other hand I still prefer my D750 for the real viewfinder and the long battery life. In any case in the video the comparison is between the high range z7 and the entry level d3300 so the difference in ergonomics is also due to the different price range and target (pro vs entry level)

@andyblessett1282

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameshogg601 with all respect sir, if we all shared that view, we'd still be riding around in horse drawn carts. But, yes I do love my DSLRs too!

@nAcolz

2 жыл бұрын

@@jameshogg601 eh, I shoot on Fuji X series cameras and the ergonomics are amazing. There's a lot more cameras to choose from now in the mirrorless segment than there used to when I used DSLRs, but I enjoy mirrorless way more

@jameshogg601

2 жыл бұрын

@@nAcolz comparing canons m and Sony's early alpha series they were too small in the a hand. Fuji is a different matter a work of art.

I think it's about time photographer's on these KZread vlogs realise not everyone who watched can afford cameras costing thousands of pounds especially when we are on minimum wage jobs or like myself off sick from work due to a knee operation, so it's a breath of fresh air when you show that cheaper cameras can give you inspiration to get out and take photos. Well done. PS why couldn't you say the camera was a thirty three hundred rather than three three hundred 😃 Enjoy your trip 👍 Steve Hassall

@purewolfking4146

2 жыл бұрын

Yes the American way thirty three hundred as he said dollar’s! 😀

@kaneclements7761

2 жыл бұрын

Hi Steve. Really good points. The camera / photo industry is about shifting gear a lot of the time. Outside of 'sports and wildlife' well of the latter birds in flight or the big stuff at long range most of the cameras from the last decade will do a decent job. I figure Nigel might have got the same set up for less elsewhere.

New Z50 owner, had buyers remorse thinking about full frame then checked myself. The Z50 is superior to %99.9 of all cameras ever made. Talent, practice and knowledge are much more important than the gear, IMO and I love gear! lol

I'm saving this video and watching it everytime I feel like blowing a load of money on new gear I don't really need. Also, thanks for the free trial!

Speaking of cameras on a budget, I was talking to a local photographer who's been wanting to sell some of his DSLR stuff since he's transitioned into the Z system. And I think he's got a soft spot for me, as I'm a young college kid doing my best to do photography with what I've slowly gained over the years, because he offered me one of his old D810s for 500 dollars, when I know he had previously been wanting to get 750-900 for it. So yay me. It'll be a nice addition to go along with my more action oriented D7500

For landscape photography I think it's one of the biggest misconceptions that you need a high-end camera. Landscape is probably one of the few genres that you really don't need a high-end camera and that even a basic $400 new budget camera would be fine, since you're on a tripod many times, and most cameras have the features you need. Yes a $4000 full frame camera may give you more options and might have more dynamic range technically but overall, I think any differences would be very minimal or not even noticeable in most cases. I'm all for buying a cheaper camera for landscape. Heck, you usually don't even need super fast lenses either. In fact I feel that landscape photography is the cheapest genre of photography to get into because you don't need a super expensive body (a used $200 APS-C body might even work) and some basic lenses (don't have to be fast). You could build a nice landscape kit for $500 if you buy used. I would say that the lenses you choose are going to be way more important than the body you choose.

@bobby350z

2 жыл бұрын

I don't know what to say. A decent tripod will set you back $500 if not more .

@nogerboher5266

2 жыл бұрын

Am I the only Landscape shooter in the world that doesn't shoot with a tripod? Like, I don't even take one with me... I only use tripods for my portrait work.

@sigsegv111

2 жыл бұрын

I agree but what you say is perfectly valid and correct but still gear matters, but I'd say not that much ... I have had many cameras in my life and I've started my "digital" landscapes in real with D80 and it was absolute miracle (just ooc JPGs were miracle, I didn't do postprocess at the beginning like many others) compared to analog camera, then after few years I've upgraded to D5100 and again, the difference was fantastic, and then after next 5 years (well, now I see that I change camera every 4-5 years) I've bought D7200 and again, the difference was huge .. and with my D7200 I started thinking about to finally go for FX so I started first building my holy trinity triple set so I did it (16-35 f/4, 24-70 f/2.8, 70-200 f/4) and after my bank account recovered from it I've finally bought the camera of my dreams - D850 .. and ofc leap forward was huge but in reality in wide angle (16-24mm) range it seemed to me that the IQ decreased because of lens IQ. I am not going to bother you with long story - with more and longer hikes into the great wilderness I found myself employing more my old D7200 with Tokina 11-20 f/2.8 and kit 18-140 lens rather than D850 because mainly for weight. So what I want to say - for landscape photography you need a decent 24MP+ camera and good lenses and also depends on your style. If the hike and just the time spent in the great outdoors is important for you I'd recommend lighter DX set. If you don't hike (or hike a little) and you typically go with car somewhere and then get on your location without big hike then FX camera will give you a slight edge. My two sets are now D7200 - 2.0kg (11-20, 18-140 lenses + spare battery) Vs D850 - 3.15kg (16-35, 70-200 lenses + spare battery). Advantage of smaller set is also that I can pack it into smaller backpack and as I've noted above, D850+Nikon 16-35 has worse IQ (noticeably off center) than outstanding Tokina 11-20mm f/2.8 on D7200 body which is sharp and perfect side to side

@seantomlinson3320

2 жыл бұрын

I agree. Yes, lots of fetishizing about ISO 64 or 45 or 61 or 100 MP or 15 stops of dynamic range. Blah blah blah. Give me a competent photographer with that D3300 and they'll do just fine. Nigel's video demonstrated that perfectly.

@heathenwolf4997

2 жыл бұрын

My kit was $333 on Amazon. I got the Canon EOS Rebel T100 and it's great for what I need it for. Haven't had an issue

Thank you. D3300: I wonder if you turned the VR to "OFF" when using the tripod? It is my understanding that the VR can degrade the image as it "hunts" for non existent movement.

I've been using the Nikon D3300 for 7 years before upgrading to the Nikon D780 only a few months ago. Of course newer cameras have better ISO performance and more/better comfort functions and I love my new camera for that. However, for every comfort function in a newer camera there has been a workaround while working with the D3300. The workaround maybe were more inconvenient, but in the end the results were great. I'm glad you proved that in your video.

@SHENRAR

2 жыл бұрын

I choose the d3300 as my first DSLR because I read the sensos was really good and because the full range of second hand lenses I would be able to find being a Nikon. I know it's an old piece of hardware, but I know too that I am learning and don't need a z9. There will be more than enough time for me to get better gear, by now, it's all about getting better as a photographer.

@awooga772

2 жыл бұрын

Still using one? Godamn haha mine was robbed off me a few years ago and I went onto a full frame canon

@SHENRAR

2 жыл бұрын

@@awooga772 yep, and I bought it recently. I used to have a bridge Lumix that was pretty good as a first camera, but lacked the picture quality that I was looking for as I got more into photography, so I decided to buy my first DSLR, and after much research, decided Nikon was a better option (nothing against other brands, just that nikon had the same mount since the 60s, so second hand lenses would be available for sure), then I looked into the D3500 and noticed that the only upgrades from the D3300 were marginal, so I found a really good deal with only 4 thousand shots, so brand new. Then I bought a long lens and a wide angle, and now my kit is pretty much on point. I know that I will upgrade to a new mirrorless body somewhere down the road, but my lenses will still work (with the adapter) and by now, Im pretty happy with what I get out of the camera. Damn, too long of a comment, sorry XD

@timrehfeldt3446

2 жыл бұрын

@@SHENRAR the new Nikon mount was my only concern about my purchase of the D780. I guess there won't be many new lens releases for the old F-Mount. However, professionals have been working with the F mount for years and years and have produced professional results. So I went for the D780.

@SHENRAR

2 жыл бұрын

@@timrehfeldt3446 maybe I am oversimplifying it because I am a total nob, but I am totally content with my "holy trinity" and I could not justify to buy more lenses when it covers from 10 to 300mm. I know that the day I want to get into astro I will eat my words and will want to have all 1.8, but... XD

LOVE my D3300...been using it for over 5 years and every time i think about upgrading, i realize the D300 works great for me as a hobbyist who rarely prints anything. this video makes me feel better about not upgrading.

I love these comparisons, I need to watch them to remind myself it's me that needs to improve, not my equipment! It's pretty heartening that a beginner can pick up a good quality camera and lens for £200. I bet the used DSLR market is flooded with excellent cameras and lenses as people move to mirrorless. I bet their are some real bargains out there. Looking forward to the Antarctica vids. Love the glimpses we've see on social media.

This is the perfect example of it not being the gear that matters, it’s the skill of the photographer. Very cool.

I had the D3000 and although it was really limited in some of its capabilities, such as bracketing, it really taught me some great lessons, mainly because it slowed me down. As a beginner that was actually really useful. I replaced it with a D7200, that I still use and will hopefully move on to the Z6 or Z7 later this year. I appreciate all of the ‘lessons’ these cameras have taught me over the years and yes, it really is about getting out and shooting.

Better gear makes life easier for the photographer but it does not make one a good photographer. What makes one a good photographer, besides practice, is understanding what you are doing behind the camera. This understanding includes how pick the settings for a scene, types of shoots needed, and composition. A version of the 80/20 rule applies here, it's 80% behind the camera and 20% gear. Better gear makes being in the field less frustrating as you are not fighting the limitations of the gear. I do not think the D3300 can do automatic bracketing like many cameras can do. So bracketing is a completely manual process, doable but more tedious. But I am keeping my D3200 as a backup camera because it still is a very good camera even if it is not as nice as my current camera.

Great video Nigel, really nice to hear a pro photographer and popular KZread maker encourage getting out with your camera above the apparent never ending pursuit of more megapixels!!! My favourite photo was that last portrait one with the foreground reeds, lovely composition.

YES! I am proud owner of a D3300, having been inspired by your videos a year ago to take up photography, Nigel. I managed to scoop mine up for 150 pounds, and a lens for 60 pounds however I have been able to take a lot of photos I am very proud of. More people need to know photography doesn't have to be a rich man's hobby! Thanks once again for another great video:)

Fascinating video. My first camera in 2014 was a D3300 and I had lots of great photos from it, but I have quite large hands and constantly catching the wrong buttons, causing blurred focus, in the end became such an annoyance that I upgraded to a D500, which was much more comfortable. In the last 8 months I have again switched up this time to a Z7 and I love it. Comfortable, light and very easy to get great images. It's been a huge and very rewarding learning curve and I'm still learning!

Having used a D,3400 for a few years, I can agree with some of the frustrations, but image quality was not one of them. It even holds up in some challenging light conditions. It now serves as a capable backup to my D500. Getting out and shooting is the best advice. 👍 🥂

I went from the 3100 to the 7200 to the Z6. One of the differences I noticed was the 'editability' of the Z6 images. Seems to have much more range and flexibility when I edit. And the acceptable ISO range has increased. I used to worry if I was over 400. Now I shoot in the 2000 range in low light and know I can use the shots.

@duncansteward4331

2 жыл бұрын

As you went from Nikon D5200 to D7100 and on to D780 --- the Files from the D780 are so much better for editing

Great video Nigel. I am an old guy, newbie to digital photography with a "proper" camera. My previous "proper" camera was an Olympus OM-1 that I bought used in 1978. All of my shots from yesteryear were much less thought out than those I attempt these days. I completely agree with your closing comments. Great photography will always hinge on where the lens is pointed and how the photographer applies the tech details to the scene. Keep up the great work. I really looking forward to your retrace of Shackleton's voyages; hope it wasn't like

My wife bought me the D3300 as my first ILC just before my second daughter was born. I took some time off of work after her birth and used my daughter as a model. I took the time to learn about shooting in manual, the exposure triangle and (a bit) about composition. After about 6 months I found the ergonomics I found the ergonomics limiting for making quick changes to my settings. I have now upgraded to the Z6 and have found it to be a near perfect camera for me. It was fun to watch a video featuring “my” old camera. Maybe I’ll go back and look at some old images now. 🤔

@martharetallick204

2 жыл бұрын

Kids are wonderful for photographic practice. Keep going. As they grow, they will really appreciate what you are doing.

Nigel, You proved your point that getting out, taking the shot, and post-processing the image is much more important than the camera you use. I would like to point out though that you are talking about landscape photography and not high speed action photography. The same comparison while shooting a football game or even fast moving wildlife would fall apart. There would be no comparison. But, as a landscape photographer who tries to shoot at ISO 64 and 100 on a tripod, I appreciate your comparison and your results. Makes me want to pull out my D70s, D5500, and compare their images to my D850 images. Thanks so much. I always enjoy your videos. Nice seeing Rick tag along to help with the filming.

I love how before the skillshare plug about improving editing there is a massive editing error with the music/drone montage 😆

So interesting as I have a D3300. My first and so far only camera. I shoot mostly “urban” and like hand held, optical view finder shooting. With nothing to compare against I don’t find the ergonomics too bad. Recently been wondering about “upgrading” so this video has really helped to clarify my thinking. Thanks.

That statement on tech specs not being the be-all-end-all is so true. I shoot exclusively with lenses from 30+ years ago (albeit on a Z6) and when I get a bad result, it's because of me, not because of my gear. Fantastic video Nigel, packed with tips and great photos as per usual.

I still remember your video with Canon 250D and a kit lens, magnificent result. Love this kind of video, Nigel. You've got marvelous photos.

I started with a D3100. I loved the image quality, the only reason I upgraded was due to the buffer. I shoot airshows & would only get around 4 or 5 raw shots before the buffer would kick in. I traded it for a D7000 that had 2 sd cards & a bigger buffer. I like this type of videos Nigel, thank you.

Excellent idea for a video. Very informative, and should be kept in mind for those who insist on the belief that tossing your current camera into the closet and heading to the camera store for new equipment will improve your photography.

You've done a brilliant job there Nigel. I must confess that I, like maybe a lot of people, yearn to own the latest and greatest technology but don't have a large enough wallet to allow it. As has been said by others "it aint what ya got, its what ya do with it". I started off with a Canon AE1, (remember those!) I now have a 5div, I would love a Canon R5 but the cameras I presently own produce images that are second to none, (Although I know there will be people who will argue that point 😏). Technology moves on and I suppose that's a good thing but one has to make the best of what they can obtain. Your video shows that really good images can be had without chasing the 'latest and greatest'. Thanks Nigel.

I've got a Nikon D3100 and it's awesome, built like a tank and takes great images, has a few limitations but its great for landscapes. Like you say its all about getting out there and practicing. Great video nigel 👍

I used a D5300 for over 4 years before I recently switched to Fuji, I honestly had so much fun using that camera and travelling with it.

Interesting comments. I’ve gone from the D5300, to the D5500, the D750 and now the Z7ii. Certainly the ergonomics are better, along with the low light performance, and sharpness. However, part of the reasons for each upgrade are to remove any internal excuses. If you have the best available equipment, any flaws in the photo are your own problem to deal with.

Many a good tune has been played on an old fiddle. Great print to end the vlog. Nicely done Nigel. Stay safe 🇦🇺

This was a great comparison. My first DSLR was a D3300, and still do have it. I did my beginners and intermediate courses on it as well. Started to teach my wife the basics on it. But I now have a Z5, and I totally get what you say. The feel of the comers, the ergonomics of it and the EVF makes all the difference.

Loved, loved, LOVED this video. I own a D5300 and do love technology as a whole, always looking for the next purchase. Thank you so much for your great work Nigel ! You always bring us back to what matters. So inspiring.

Videos like this always make me feel better about the fact that I am still using a D3400 and can't afford to upgrade. And I don't really need to based on what I use the photography for anyway! If I ever do, for some of the reasons you mentioned, I would likely stick with Nikon because it took me long enough to learn their system. Thanks for doing this!

Great video! I still use a d3300 and although it can be slow (probably down to it’s user!) it has taught me a lot. Even as a beginner, I have gotten some nice landscape and some sports photos from it!

I am living proof this is true. Had a Rebel Canon thought better gear would make me better. Spent 6k and my stuff is still shit 🤣 But to add i have fun and this is an amazing hobby, I am improving slowly and that's all that counts. It makes me happy to own great gear for when I do become better and in the mean time I practice a lot and have fun with this as much as I can.

I used the D5600 before and it's a great camera in terms of image quality. The main reason I eventually upgraded it was usability and build quality/weather sealing.The difference between that and a top end mirrorless camera is small.

Great video Nigel, as you said it’s all about getting out. I use a Nikon D7200 and just love it. Looking forward to next week.

Great videos mate keep them up and you've helped me a ton with photography as I'm a beginner and I'm sure you've helped loads of other people. Keep it up 👍

Great information really informative and helpful . I use a g9 and was disappointed with my results the other day but looking back I made little mistakes not the camera. Always look at yourself first before jumping on the I need a new camera bandwagon.

Very inspirational Nigel esp for hobbyists like myself. I use a D5600 and recently purchased an Olympus EM10 mk iv for travel. I really enjoy using both but agree having the histogram and other info available in the viewfinder is an advantage. I heavily rely on the meter in manual mode when using the Nikon, but still tend to use it when out with a tripod. Agree that ergonomics are very important.

Bravo, great video. The High Iso performance improved with the D3400. My wife has a D3500 which cost 419 EUR with the same lens in 2020. Best value for money, great picture quality. However, I prefer bodies with a much better ergonomics and build quality.

I use a D5300. Roughly the same camera but with a flippable fold out screen. As a amateur photographer it fits me quite well. Price, quality, and usability... Although, I'm use to using it so I'm pretty quick with on the fly adjustments.

Great tip Nigel moving the camera around to get the grasses to be leading lines. I learn from every one of your videos. Thanks!

Great video, appreciate the comparison. When I got back into landscape photography again it was with a d3100. It was a great camera and the kit lens was pretty solid. I still have some favorite images from that camera. It's ass you said - the best way to improve your landscape photography is to just get out there and practice (work on compositions, editing technique, and really - just hours of experience). I am still guilty of enjoying a new camera here and there though! :D

Very interesting for me Nigel, I’m a beginner/amateur and I am thinking of upgrading my elderly D40x to the less elderly D3300 on a budget, purely to get live view and multiple focal points that the D40x lacks. I am used to un-ergonomics so will probably feel at home with the D3300, going from 10mp to 24mp hopefully will produce a bit sharper images too. I’m a hobbyist, don’t have to make a living out of photography and don’t produce any large prints so spending a lot on a camera would not be cost effective. This test shows me that the difference in image quality is not massive, thanks for doing this 👍

Still rocking my D300s here, and it's fantastic. 12.3MP, which if it was ever a short coming, it isn't now with photoshop/lightroom super resolution feature, I now have effectively just shy of a 50MP camera! It was released as a prosumer camera that is weather sealed, so it's a bit of a heavy lump which is the only downside but the most important thing is that I really enjoy using it and with that nothing else really matters.

Another great video. I use the D5600 and this kind of thing gives me more confidence in what I'm doing. Also managed to get onto the Skill share free trial, so I'm looking forward to seeing your tutorial on there this week. Thanks Nigel, keep doing what you're doing! One last thing, I was in SFO and bought a Giants cap, heard it improves editing skills 😉

Nigel, as a hobbyist who has been using my cell phone to take photos for several years, I'm now looking to purchasing an affordable camera. After watching this video I looked into purchasing the D3300. Of course now I am completely confused with other options and will continue to do my research until I find just right camera for my pocketbook and needs. I so appreciate your wealth of knowledge and expertise. You're an amazing photographer. Thank you so much for sharing your work.

Interesting comparison. Recently I traded a friend a lens for a guitar he no longer wanted. His camera was the D3300 and the lens was a better match for that camera than mine which was three times the price. For an intro level camera, the D3300 was impressive. I might pick one up for my wife.

Your videos are so inspiring! And you're so right about the composition and artistic skills/editing being the most important. I can't afford a $4k camera but as an amateur I can still have fun taking some cool images!!

Great piece. Thank you for another interesting film. I’ll hold onto my D200 & D300s a while longer.

My first "Proper" camera when I decided to get more involved with photography was a D3300. This was a great camera for it's time. It developed a small fault a couple of years ago just at the start of the lockdown and I couldn't get it fixed so I used that as an excuse to get a Z7. Which will be my camera for the rest of my life. But if I drop it off a cliff I still have the D3300 and some nice lenses....It's not about the gear!

This was an interesting comparison, great images, and b-roll is like watching a movie!

I recently picked up a second hand D5300 that I needed to try out some macro ideas (thanks to the physics of the smaller DX sensor) and it performed way above my expectations. That 24mpix sensor punches so far above its weight, it's phenomenal. Sometimes you have to make accommodations for the deficiencies of older technology - longer exposure instead of higher ISO is a really good example - but that's actually a big part of what I enjoy about photography in the first place.

@ulrichblancke1293

2 жыл бұрын

I've made the sames expierences with my D5600 and my Z7. I love the low weight of the D5600 special when I make streetfotography.

This is a really interesting and thought provoking video Nigel. It proves the point that the gear is not the limiting factor if you are a skilled photographer. I have D7100 which I still enjoy using, but when I'm hiking I generally take my little Sony RX100 which fits in my pocket and still takes surprising good RAW images.

@johnr.watson7500

2 жыл бұрын

I've got an RX100 mk2 and after several years still can't believe how good it is!

They actually go for a bit less sometimes…picked one up with the same lens in decent condition for £230 on an eBay buy it now…perfect camera to learn on for photography students etc. Even has a bag, spare battery and memory card.👍

Nigel ThankYou for Showing D3300 18-55 comparing to Zed7 24-200, I truly enjoyed seeing u use lower end and higher end together. It is Truly enjoyable learning your techniques.! And what you teach doesn't matter camera you got, it's more your talent and the Teaching that counts.! Again ThankYou for Showing mmRange F/Stop ISO from beginning to end of Your Video, it gives me enough time to right it down.! I have the D3400, D750 and the D850 and I Truly Luv all 3, and was extremely happy you were Satisfied with the Crop D3300, I would have been sad if you hadn't - Kudos to You.! I will follow your clips - again ThankYou Bosto Massachusetts ( TimeTraveler )

This, yes. One of my favorite photographs is a panorama of the Royal Botanical Gardens in northern Thailand about fifteen years ago, taken with a Nikon fixed-lens consumer-level camera that’s practically unusable by today’s standards. And you’d have had to pry it from my cold, dead fingers to get it away from me on that trip. I’ve used Olympus cameras over the last ten years, which as of four days ago on the latest release STILL have not cleared a 20mp sensor. I use them because I like the ergonomics, the portability, the second-to-none IBIS, the computational photography features, etc. But in the end, none of that is about the art of photography. I subscribe to this channel because I appreciate the insights on lighting, composition, editing, and the simple human act of opening yourself to the beauty all around you. (The videos, including the drone footage and your obvious affection for your dog are also very nicely put together.) Gear-talk bores me, frankly. More pixels and dynamic range are always welcome, but what I really want is your drive and talent.

I still have mine, and I still use it from time to time! I agree with you on the ease of use, that's why I also have a Sony a7, the advantages are obvious. But it still gives me great pleasure to use the old D3300.

Excellent video. And one of my favourite locations. I have a Z7II as my main with the trinity of 2.8s but my backup and everyday carry is a D3300 with the 18-55 VR. It's astonishingly capable for such an affordable and compact set up.

I had a d3200 for some years. last year when i retired I bout a D5600 I was the best I could afford the main reason for buying a new camera was I wanted one with a moveable screen it is much easier then getting on my knees or getting behind the eye piece just tilting the screen makes life easier as my flexibility as gone some what

I've been using the d3300 for the past 3 or 4 years. Over that time period I've been fortunate enough to borrow some pro camera bodies. Almost every time I borrowed one the most of the differences I noticed were the usability of the camera more than the image quality. What I find the most annoying is the fact that I either have to program the awkwardly placed side function button to change ISO or dig into the menu. I use the d3300 for professional photo and video work and it definitely gets the job done. Hopefully one day when I can justify the cost I'll upgrade to something like the z6.

@kaneclements7761

2 жыл бұрын

if you need to go mirrorless or the 3300 breaks the Z5 might be the way to go. 24MP, twin card slots and I think weather sealed. Cracking value for the $ / £ / € and so forth.

@joshuakyles

2 жыл бұрын

@@kaneclements7761 I thought about the z5 however I like the video features the z6 has over the z5. The z5 does seems like the best choice from a photography standpoint however it would be nice not to have cropped video as I find that very annoying. I'm probably going to be looking in the used market for a new camera so the difference in price isn't that much. Thanks for the advice

@anlsahal4147

2 жыл бұрын

I also have a D3300 and upgraded to a Z6. D3300 produces excellent results. But Z6 is on another level, it justifies itself😀

For use on Twitter or Instagram any camera in the last 10 years is just fine. It frustrates me that so many very talented photographers on KZread use these platforms exclusively. I would love to see more of these creators use Flickr (or similar) where one can post large enough files to really show off the image!

Fantastic video Nigel! It was awesome the way you compared the 2 cameras. I have a D7500 myself and have often wondered is the if having a crop sensored camera if I'd be able to pull off the kinda photos yourself and other pro photographers with full frame or medium format and fantastic (expensive) 😉 lenses... This was a great comparison I feel. Looks like I've got some work to do with improving composition and editing. 😉😁👍 Thanks once again for your experience. 🙏🙂

This reminds me of recent experience shooting a sunset with young grandson, he used D3100 & I my Z7. Comparing our images, both gave great results which proves it is about composition & camera skills not so much about gear.

This was so interesting, comparing the two cameras and sharing results, which surprisingly didn't make a massive difference here with the detail for the size you printed. Many thanks, Nigel. I was intrigued at the results. It certainly shows that it's not the size of the camera's megapixels, but the photography skills and knowledge of the user and 'usability' of the equipment - and not how much the equipment costs, or how new it is. Like you said, it's more about getting out there and using what you have, to the best pdf your ability and personal skills. Great video.

Great video. I shoot with a D3300. Yes, I'd love to have a Nikon Z anything. LOL But, it doesn't make me like my 3300 any less. On the ISO differences, I think that's just a matter of more recent technology. My first DSLR was a D50. The ISO range was 200-1600. 400 was the fastest ISO I considered usable. On the 3300, I find 1600 to be "ok." Seems like the Z series cameras have more "modern conveniences." So much on the 3300 you have to go into the menu, while on the Z7, you push a button and turn the wheel. The only feature I'd REALLY like to have is the ability to see the histogram before I shoot; on the 3300, I can't see a histogram until after I take a shot.

Oh bless you. Yes, I have been patiently waiting. The only camera I really want is the D7100 which will support the Nikkor 10 - 20mm lens which I want for lightning / thunderstorms here in Valencia. Weather shielded, 2 SD card slots, Magnesium body and plenty of buttons to press without having to go into the menu. There are 2 things that spring to mind with my D3000, and that is the ISO performance. I can't go over 400 ISO and the self timer has to be set for every image I take. It defaults back to single shot every time. I believe it to be a bug in the firmware as the remote works fine ( if I remember to take it with me ). But, the 18 -55mm kit lens would drastically improve my image quality over the FX 35 - 80mm F4 D lens I currently have. Great video mate.

Nice video. I was only thinking about this the other day. I had to sell my d300s and lenses last year. Then decided to get into landscape photography. I bought a mint canon 30d (8mp) £45 and a sigma 18-50 2.8 ex £120. Both mint!. Enjoying used them. Now reached a point where I need to upgrade the camera. Picked up a mint canon 7D mk2 £550. Yes until you reach a certain level or the gear holds you back, cheaper cameras are great. The quality is there. I found doing super res works well. First it’s finding a location, then a composition, execution, then edit. Of course the 30d is a semi pro metal body. I’m happy with the same lens on a 7D mk2 (20mp).

@purewolfking4146

2 жыл бұрын

Also you can pick a d300s in nice order for £250 on average.

Thanks for the content. My $400 eBay camera - when I made the jump from a point-and-shoot, was a gently used Nikon D7000 with a Tamron 70-300mm zoom lens thrown in. As soon as budget permitted, I picked up a good used 35mm Nikkor prime for it and honestly, that's what I shoot 90% of my stuff with. Still learning, still shaking this camera down, now I'm starting to think about more advanced editing, which is how I found you.

Excellent points and spot on. People get hung up on more megapixels. Unless your printing for billboards, not needed. Get out and enjoy taking photos. Thx again

I used the D3300 as I started out doing photography about 6 years ago. It held up pretty good with the photos I wanted to take but was then quicky outshined by a Canon 80D when I started doing corporate work. Great camera tho, you dont need more than that when you start out!

I was a wedding photographer until about 2013 & the camera I used was the Nikon D300 ( and the D200, & D100 before it) !! Super images for the time. How things have changed in a short period of time!!

Very interesting comparison Nigel. You are talking about stuffs that are very important. Im also someone who love technology. Before getting a Z6ii, I was using a D5300 and I was very happy with it. Then one day I felt I reached its limits, and the Z6ii was announced by Nikon, so I made the step. I didnt sell my D5300 as I was so happy with it that I keep it as it still might be useful to me. But, as much as I liked the D5300, ergonomics and usability speaking, the Z6ii is definitely a great choice. But it's very important to remind that it's not the camera that makes great pictures, it's the photographer and the lens quality.

Nigel, I think this is the most important video you've done in a while. I love all of your videos, but I say this one is important because it resonates with a much wider audience. It shows you can get great results with entry level equipment and equipment is only a small part of taking great photos, especially in landscape photography. A $3k camera lens combo is simply out of reach financially for many people, but almost anyone could come up with $400 if they really wanted to. You bring up valid comments about the usability of the D3300, but I think it's just what you get used to. If that's your only camera and you know it inside and out the usability issues are much less a problem. Under close inspection the images from the Z7 are technically better, but you have to ask yourself are they $2.5k better?

Great video Nigel, thank you. For me the best image of the the day was the last one, taken on the d3300, a beginner's DX camera, with a kit lens....it's not what kit you have it's how you use it that's important for me.

Great video yet again! I would love to see you compare the d300s to the z7, its the camera I use and I absolutely love mine!

The D3300 was my first digital camera. I still have it, along with my D7200 and Z5. I put the Sigma 17-50 f/2.8 on the D3300 and still use it for my quick "grab it and take the shot" camera. It's difficult to part ways with a camera that takes nice pictures.

I find images from d3300 kombo more 3D looking with more pleasing colours compared to z7 combo. Warmer tones also :)

I totally agree about usability being a key factor. I'm still on a D7200 which has a terrible live view. There is nothing worse than trying to knee down in a stream trying to look through the viewfinder. It really affects how well I can compose a shot or even if i can get a shot at all. Hoping to upgrade soon even though it is often hard to justify spending $2k just for some ergo improvements when the camera I have is capable of taking great photos. As always, great video! Love your work!

Excited to hear about your class on Skillshare, will check it out.

Great video, Nigel, thank you. I’ve been looking for a back up camera to my D850, and I will be less fussy about megapixels, now. Details are definitely better with your D7, but I like the vibrancy of the D3300 images. Due to your editing, I assume? Regards from Oregon.

I bought a D3200 (the D3300 only seemed a minor upgrade on this) back in 2012 as it was the first 24MP DX Nikon & used it together with my D300S & D700, I still use it every so often (the Z fc is taking its place in my setup). I was a little disappointed at the time as the autofocus seemed to need calibrating which isn’t possible on that model. It is okay for landscape if I use the live view autofocus (slow) which is why it can sometimes be found in my rucksack although the Z series are light enough compared to the larger D series I used to carry about.

very interesting. your results support this persons camera-instincts. yes viewfinder use is frankly well tricky but being out, working on ones comp and editting skills is the thing for the hobbyist with a 10+ year old Nikon! thank you for making this video.

That D3300 pano was just incredible. It proves that gear is irrleavant. The eye and imagination behind the viewfinder makes all the difference.

The video demonstrates how small the technical improvements were for Bayer sensor systems in the last 10 years. Most of the differences shown at base ISO belong to the lens qualities. For landscape photographers a real breakthrough might come only with a non-Bayer sensor in the far future. Not good for companies like Nikon, which anyhow have to deal with shrinking market sizes… For anyone interested in a budget system, I would recommend the D5200 over the D3300. Same 24MP sensor, but bracketing function and tilt-screen. Much more convenient in the field but comparable prices.

Nice video as always! Any recommendations for winter photography gloves? I have struggle to find a suitable pair

As ever, thanks for such a fascinating video and the location looked stunning. Don’t usually mention a sponsor, but thanks for the recommendation - willing to give it a go. Particularly looking forward to your editing skill share. 👏

I have always been a strong believer that it's not the gear it's the photographer. That said even I started to wonder if I needed to upgrade my camera until you did the Edit my RAW vid many moons ago. Being able to compare your RAW files to my RAW files showed there was not a huge difference in them, not enough to warrant an upgrade. Your edit my raw files was an enormous help to my photography (concentrating on the photography) and I'm still using my old camera to this day thank you.

Really helpfull this video. I am an Canon shooter (90D) and it's a very good APS-C body. I use the Sigma 18-35mm for landscape and I was considering going full frame, but now you have made my decision much easier......:-)

Excellent vid. Thanks.

Very interesting Nigel. I usually take my D7200 as well as my Z6 on shoots but use the D7200 only as back up despite having used it for a number of years for my landscapes and other stuff. I agree that it comes down to ergonomics/usability but for me the Z6 with live histo means I take far fewer shots because I spend less time trying to get the exposure right, and I like the 24-200mm lens

Thank you for the reminder that it’s about the photographer and not the camera. This video also reminded me how important a tripod is. I shoot with a d5500 and have thought about upgrading to an entry level mirrorless but can’t justify the difference in quality for how much it would cost. Thanks for saving me lots of money. I’ve decided to invest in a couple of new lenses rather than a camera.

Great video Nigel. Little ironic that you start talking about Skillshare and improving your video editing just after you showed drone shots with no music then the music came in when you started talking back at the studio!! ;)

Top youtube contribution, super edited, very instructive

I picked up a D5600 last year as a lightweight throw-about camera for not much more than you paid for the D3300. Fully articulated touch screen, and 14bit RAW. Cracking little camera, just keep out of the high ISOs. User interface is pretty good with the touch screen, I don't know how much lacking that feature impacts the D3300.

very interesting video with some good points about photography and gear!