The fact that you can actually 3D print an impeller rotating at such a speed with a plastic is insane

@FilosophicalPharmer

11 ай бұрын

Makes me dizzy thinking about it

@nocare

11 ай бұрын

You might find polymers such as PEEK interesting. It's a super polymer usable in 3d printers with a usable part temp of 482 F and a melting point of 662 F Your average hobby soldering iron doesn't even get hot enough to melt this plastic. It has a tensile strength comparable to some types of steel.

@Hughjanus720

11 ай бұрын

@@nocare good luck printing that with a 3D printer at home…..

@nocare

11 ай бұрын

@@Hughjanus720 You can, you just needed one with a heated chamber and a high temp hot end. And ender 3 can literaly print peek if you mod it. You will only get the less capable amorphous peek unless your chamber can break 113 C which gets you crystalline peek. That takes water cooling though so most printers can't do crystalline.

@Hughjanus720

11 ай бұрын

@@nocare I could build a whole car at home too, just don’t think it’s worth it

The dyson's impeller is used in a vacuum that sucks up dust and the one this guy made creates dust and efficiently spreads it around everywhere.

@AnIdiotwithaSubaru

11 ай бұрын

Fresh micro-plastics for your lungs 🤤

@AbsolutionArmament

11 ай бұрын

The world requires balance.

@rawhidelamp

11 ай бұрын

Anti-dyson expeller

@Jacon95

11 ай бұрын

and the circle closes

@Arek_R.

11 ай бұрын

@@AnIdiotwithaSubaru ??? There is hepa filter at the end

For balancing rotating parts like the impeller, you could use the method my father used to balance his model aircraft propellers. He had a shaft the size as the center hole in the propeller. The shaft came to close to a needle point on either end and was carefully balanced at either end on a metal plate so that it would spin as freely as possible. The propeller was then gently spun and allowed to come to a rest. If the propeller ended up one blade down, that blade was marked and spun again to see if the same blade ended up pointing down. If was the same blade again on the next try, a little was shaved from the end and the whole process repeated until it seemed to be random as to which blade was pointing down.

@boomjeep99

11 ай бұрын

Wonder if ya.could use water to float it check for lower/higher side

@Cen.Reaper

11 ай бұрын

That's how to balance everything that rotates actually

@conorstewart2214

11 ай бұрын

That only balances the weight, not the thrust and this impeller is that small that the weight imbalance would be tiny, you would struggle to find anything low friction enough to do the test the way you described.

@lightningdev1

11 ай бұрын

@@lukearts2954 honestly his comment is not even close to ChatGPT-levels of unhuman writing. I'd be surprised if ChatGPT or similar wrote that without some prompt engineering

@gtjack9

11 ай бұрын

@@lukearts2954 It wasn’t chat GPT, I’m just neuro divergent and struggle to organise a coherent sentence 😂

Ya know Daniel, I've been subbed to you for a really long time. You were a kid back then and your videos were kind of cute. Kid makes cool things out foam cuz he is a kid and has no money but here we are all these years later and honestly you are a true gift. Everything you make is interesting even your ad/sponsor parts of videos. So I just want to say thank you for all you do.

@amogusenjoyer

11 ай бұрын

This is such a nice comment. Awwww!!

@bAc0nBoY755

11 ай бұрын

wholesome comment

@28th_St_Air

11 ай бұрын

Likewise. I’ve been watching him since he was destroying things in his parents garage and neighborhood. Very entertaining. I wish I had even half the fabrication knowledge he has learned over the years.

@sicklad3277

11 ай бұрын

Always amazed me as to how he could glue a few bits of foam together and have such a good flying rc plane

@Mattle_lutra

11 ай бұрын

I also love how he lets shit blow up and scuff his hand, but doesn't care and goes on with the project. It's aerospace grade chaos, no drama!🤣

Knowing a little about high rpm’s, it is ALLL about balance. It’s quite impressive to get such results in a home lab setting 👍

@mindaugasplauska5781

11 ай бұрын

it's not quiet , it's loud and impressive nonetheless , i see u man have understanding gut in you big balls , basketballs i mean

@KingSkrap

10 ай бұрын

Bro turbo’s his vacuuum

@sigmamale4147

10 ай бұрын

@@KingSkrap bro should put a mini v12 in his vacuum

This is really SOMETHING! Thanks soo much for bringing us this, Daniell🥳🥳🥳

@bjrn-oskarrnning2740

11 ай бұрын

Psst! If your injection molding is accurate enough, maybe you could make him some more balanced impellers? Or even machine some out of aluminum or another metal?

@AnIdiotwithaSubaru

11 ай бұрын

@@bjrn-oskarrnning2740 An aluminum impeller sounds pretty sick

@ivangutowski

11 ай бұрын

it's insane what your company offer :)

You certainly have Dyson beat in the "explosive potential" category. 😂 The moment you talked about the close clearance and high RPM, my first thought was "it's about to explode".

I used to do motor R&D for Shark Vacuums. Your rate of improvement is great and watching this took me back to some of my favorite engineering. Love your work.

@Uberwald93

11 ай бұрын

Gotta do your velocity triangles and angular momentum flux conservation.

@ExplorinDoranRBrown

11 ай бұрын

I appreciate your work at Shark. Impressive power from my Shark!

@sadiporter2966

4 ай бұрын

shark motors die so soon compared to dyson :(

Dyson fan multirotor seems eerily close to fruition 😮

@Heneling

11 ай бұрын

do it!

Daniel this is some awesome engineering! Love your iterations and fearless testing. And your very well rounded skills in Cad and 3D printing. Your steadily increasing physics, systems and shop knowledge help you to quickly recover and test new ideas. Love it, man!

The motors seem to need a thrust washer/bearing as the axle seems to be pushing out which pushes the impellor into the house. You can see 13:00 after the impellor explodes that the axle retracts when the motor slows.

@aycentroid

11 ай бұрын

Was just about to mention that, he's got a lot of thing's to fix to make something remotely long lasting/usable

@41A2E

11 ай бұрын

I could be wrong, but I don't think the shaft moved it was the nuts spinning down from the inertia.

@shakeit995

11 ай бұрын

@@41A2E true, the shaft never moves only the nuts. Zoom in to make it easier to see

Your ability to crank out worthy content is mesmerizing! Thank you! It’s my hope it continues to remain more on the enjoy side than the work side for you:)

I also think there's something to be said for the plasticity level of the impeller material. After awhile the friction I'm sure causes material warping which expands the impeller and pushes it against the snail housing walls. Similar to blasting a skateboard wheel with compressed air/water and it expanding.

Today we are going to see how loud, inefficient, and unreliable we can make an impeller

@28th_St_Air

11 ай бұрын

Some of us learned about how Dyson motors are designed, ways to measure thrust and vacuum pressure with basic metering devices, and what it takes to 3D print and manually balance impellers that are spun at high RPM. Others just enjoyed seeing Daniel blow stuff up.

@That-fellar

11 ай бұрын

@@28th_St_Air the 3rd one for me

@FilosophicalPharmer

11 ай бұрын

@@28th_St_Air I did both. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@jeffh8803

11 ай бұрын

"Sucking at something is the first step to being sorta good at something." Winston Churchill

@FilosophicalPharmer

11 ай бұрын

“Experience is what you get right after you needed it.” - Me

This is EXACTLY what I've been looking for, an insanely high pressure blower fan that I can 3d print cheaply. Thanks!!!

Great work! It looks like your impeller spins the wrong way for the thread handedness, which if true is the reason for a number of the failures: The impeller is wanting to spin the nut off the motor shaft at higher loads. Easy fix is to print the mirror of the impeller, so that it runs in the opposite direction, and reverse the motor rotation. When I have dynamically balanced things in the past, I’ve used a flexible beam (thin long bar of aluminum) that I can clamp up on to vary its length, made a motor mount to attach to it, and put a dial test indicator (DTI) on the free end. Gives extremely precise measurement and repeatability for balancing.

you did an amazing job with these kind of things so far. You definitely showed somebody like me who is an engineer about these kind of things how difficult it really is to make these kind of things efficient enough

Really cool video. Thank you for sharing the cad file, was cool and helpful to look through and see how you made the it, especially the blades. : )

The Dyson vacuum motor is aurally a little different from a typical brushless motor. It is a switched reluctance motor if I remember right, they are good at reaching insane speeds.

@disp3rsion

11 ай бұрын

yeah. surprised he got something as basic as this wrong

@hOZish7

11 ай бұрын

But the Dyson motor has a permanent magnet as the rotor so it's not a switched reluctance motor, it's just the same old BLDC

@disp3rsion

11 ай бұрын

@@hOZish7 it has no permanent magnet

@poplix2704

11 ай бұрын

@@disp3rsion neodymium magnets are permanent and dyson uses those

"digital motor" gotta love the marketing department and their brilliant naming ideas

Last year in my design internship at a quantum cooling startup I got introduced to onshape. Coming vom Rhino7, which of course has so much functions and his hard to master, I quickly found a liking to onshape. The fact, that you can open, view and edit your file from almost any device from anywhere you can imagine because it's cloud based is so tremendous. Plus in a company you can manage projects and put single files together in a huge asssembly is amazing. The company also had formlabs Form3+ printer. Its a gamechanger compared to my own ender 3v2. No hazzle, no tweaking. The print always came out perfect and smooth.

Your turbine impeller exploding is due to unbalanced parts and large tolerances on the interfaces. You need to do two things to address this: 1) balance the rotating assembly, and 2) ensure that there is no movement of the impeller on the shaft. 1) is relatively easy: you construct a balancing spindle as described by another commenter. A precision shaft that the impeller mounts to, which tapers to needle points on both ends. The unit is suspended between angled plates, allowing it to spin freely. Then the whole assembly is spun and the downward facing blades marked. Repeat this cycle to ensure that the same blade is heavy, and then shave until the blade down is not repeatable. 2) is harder because of the materials you're working with and the parts. The threaded shaft on the motor is the main problem. Even if you print a tight fit on the impeller, if it is unbalanced at all then the forces will be amplified by the extreme rotation and cause the plastic to dig into the threads of the shaft, thus introducing slop. This slop allows more movement which allows more vibration and more slop until the whole thing goes boom. To eliminate this, you will need to sleeve the shaft with a hard metal (not brass or copper or aluminum, regular steel should be fine doesn't need to be hardened), and then bring your impeller bore to final size using a reamer instead of relying on the printers finish. Be sure to do the reaming before balancing. You may want to press in a hard bushing/mount on the impeller instead of sleeving the shaft, but again take care to ensure a very close fit on the shaft. You can keep using the nut clamp system, just under size the length of the sleeve so that the nuts still clamp the impeller directly. If you're using washers, you need to ensure a tight tolerance on the washers and consider balancing them as well. A final practical matter is airflow and cooling: you probably want to direct airflow over the motor for cooling. This will probably cost some thrust, but is critical for motor longevity especially at the high power levels you are using. Looking forward to the next installment!

Instead of a scroll housing I'd suggest taking the air all around circumference back over the motor for cooling, also exhausting in same direction as intake airflow should give better thrust. Early gets worked this way as do most model gas turbines now

It's fun to see how you and great scott differ in procedure. The hammer to open it in particular 😄

The reason why they are using only 2 pole pairs is likely also due to the electronic commutation limit. With an excess of 100000 rpm many cheaper controller are not capable of commutating motors with a high pole pair count. 100000 electronic communications a second is a common limit of those controllers. And because they practically have no load on the motor, it’s forgivable to only have two pole pairs.

@AABB-px8lc

11 ай бұрын

no, it is rare used SRM motor with quadrature sequence, very neat design for robust very high RPM cases en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Switched_reluctance_motor

@Galileocrafter

11 ай бұрын

@@AABB-px8lc Fair enough, no magnets for the rotor, makes it a bit cheaper. And with the volume of motors they need to produce it's probably a good move. You'd still ned electronics for commutation though.

Thank you for doing what you do never stop making these videos.

Amazing!! A question: from which Dyson model you have extracted the motor visible at 11:38? Seems very easy to run with original controller, differently from some other models that are more complicated.

Ive been wanting to make one of these for a project, this is amazing

I do love this video which is awesome but not quite far to compare thrust on a dyson motor which is strictly designed for being a vacuum and not for pushing air out so its really not a far comparison, but they also are designing it for better battery consumption as well. I am so impressed you were able to make a 3d printed impeller spin that fast without vaporizing, that's incredible

Was the static vane layout in the snail housing native to the Dyson? I've always thought that would make a good experiment to build pressure in a centrifugal, it should permit nozzle restriction to load the motor within it's heat handling ability

How cool. You are one of the few show ng how functional prints can be used for a myriad of applications. Well done keep it up I want to see lawn mower v2

The higher speed listed for the Dyson is with the inlet blocked. This creates a partial vacuum, which means less resistance on the impeller => higher speed

I like that you're willing to take things you've worked hard on and test them to destruction.

You can use air flow meter from the car, to measure air mass.

Really great effort, the balancing of high speed parts seems to need computer accuracy to be successful. Dyson may have a few more people, and a lot more money, to develop these systems, but I LOVE that you gave it a shot !!!

I can’t imagine the prices of those formlabs resins. How long does 1 Liter go for you? How much did the impeller take?

@mundanestuff

11 ай бұрын

$150/L the resins are expensive, but you're only using a few cc's for each print. I'm no resin printing guru, but the tools all have a calculator that you can put the price into, and it'll spit out the volume, and the cost of the part. I'll bet it was a buck or two per impeller? The shell probably $8? Wild ass guesses here.

The fact that it didn't blow up within 5 seconds impressed me!! I don't think I could ever make something spin that fast and not go pop!

I love the how to basic style of deconstruction on the vacuum

Engineering, with comedy, is always the best form of entertainment! Thanks again Daniel, I always enjoy your content. Bye. :)

If you want pressurized air to be more efficient you should check out the inside of a compressor housing on a turbo. They don’t use director blades to force the air in the direction of the outlet to increase velocity. It will help a lot.

This video had some really cool shots!

What exact motor is this? Could you run it off of an arduino with mains power instead of a battery?

9:29 two birds on a wire, one tr- Bird:AAAAAAAA

you can use high speed camera for balancing of the rotor. make a few marks that will be distinguishable when spinning and you can just chase the mark that oscilates the rotor furthest.

It's easier to remove support material before curing 👍 Also, using nyloc® nuts for the motor will keep them tight under vibrations

@zachbrown7272

11 ай бұрын

yep. my recommended workflow is to remove the part from the BP and take off the supports between Wash and Cure.

13:13 Just look at this beautiful vortex just spiraling in. Forming and dissolving. Nature is so beautiful.

Amazing, almost feel like putting on some safety goggles just looking at the high RPM testrun.

Cool beans. I have 18 partially completed projects, but I think you have me beat in terms of competed & more to come.

watching that motor mount hit your finger! ouch...felt your pain lol

components are you using to power this motor?

I think you could improve the results with a better snail housing. The radius should increase closer to the exit nozzle. (so the axle of the impeller is eccentric to the housing, while in your design it is nicely centered)

Videos like these and the influence of my dad is why I'm getting into engineering lol

I can vouch for the tenacity of Phrozen-Nylon Green Tough resin. I mostly print with my FDM printers and recently I laser too but the Phrozen-Nylon is very resilient, definitely a better bet than the standard tough resins. Nylon actually has more resilience with a bit of it's hygroscopicity satisfied. Very dry and it is more brittle.

Looks like it could be a great electric turbo for a car, bike, boat, or lawn motor... Also, what a sexy 3D print project!

Holy CRAP! The way this first iteration blew itself up was just... my reaction was like, "WHAAAH!"

Vibration is definitely a huge thing to deal with... You have to balance the impeller for static and dynamic vibration... But one more thing to consider is physical expansion due to high centrifugal force... Materials tend to expand at such high RPMs/Forces...so you have to adjust you tolerances accordingly.

Switched Reluctance Motor : Dyson DMT

The faster you try to move air (eg higher rpm), the denser the air gets. Adding the 2nd set of poled increases the torue the motor can sustain, and at a perfect 180⁰ out of phase they can be aligned perfectly to never fight against one another. The reason it isn't always done is cost. Of parts, of upgrading manufacturing, or the cost of a more complex control curcuit. Just some food for thought 🙂

Love the pcb way ad read while wearing the on-shape tee-shirt. Hitting two birds with one stone

Thumbs up for this interesting video. It must be hard to come up with new ideas that hold the interest of the many and this was one that did. Good job.

Cool watching your channel grow!

2:00 about KV rating: KV is for motor RPM what pitch speed is for a prop: when a prop is going at it's pitch speed, it's no longer producing ANY thrust. Same with a brushless, if it's going at it's theoretical RPM (KV x Volts) it's no longer producing ANY torque. When calculating the useful rpm of your motor, you have to multiply by a 'slip' factor: typically around 0.75 or 0.8 depending on alot of things ; ) So your motor should give you 118 000 * 0.75 = +- 90 000 RPM

Seems like you might have significant losses due to the design of your impeller housing. Normal centrifugal pump housings have a volute that gathers the air flung by the impeller to guide it out of the pump. Your fully toroidal housing might be losing a significant amount of thrust just swirling air around inside... Also, those internal guide vanes probably just represent losses to the airflow coming off the impeller - the angle of the outflowing air should be controlled using blade angle on the impeller, not external vanes. Would be interesting to see the effect a refined housing has on performance!

Get PCBWay to metal print an impeller for you! Awesome video

"The built in lathe" 🤣🤣🤣

You've come a long way from that kid bashing foam in the school yard! Right on!

Best ad ever! I wanted some pcbs printed.

You could probably use a bearing closer to the impeller. In the car world we would use a run out dial indicator and make sure the back side and all the tips of the blades are spinning within .001 and if your outside rear edge and all the tips of the blades are running at .001 it should be balanced. Adding hot glue will interfere with the blade effectiveness so just try taking of smooth layers on the meat or within the central part on the back of the impeller to balance just a lot of back and forth on the micrometer

Broooo, you should make a “hundred thousand miles test on rc cars” but with higher quality cars. That would be awesome, I love that video

"it's loud, inefficient and likely to explode" you mean it's perfect, thanks for the video!

Hi, i was thinking about your balancing problem. 1. Perhaps ~ if the impler/disc/whatever was marked into four sections. Red, Green, Blue, Yellow with a dot marking the top. 2. With a constant speed of rotation was maintained 3. You could then use 4 flashes of light in sequence, 1,2,3,4 so that those positions are captured on video, freezing the wheel in a series of four frames. 4. You would then be able to see which of the coloured parts of the wheel where out of alignment. This would help calibrate small wheel of any size :) Looking sideways on the wheel, and zooming in like: R1 Good G2 out B3 Good Y4 out, even worse

"I used the built-in lathe" got a good chuckle from me. I'm still watching, just wanted to mention this.

You can cut down on vibrations a bit by mounting the impeller differently. Threaded rods and nuts are very imprecise, using the nut to center the impeller will result in it being off center and at higher RPMs it will just vibrate like crazy. Minimize the impellers runout (how off center it is) and it will make balancing it much easier.

I never thought about the axial thrust load on the impeller shaft when it's sucking an air. There has to be a force pushing on the impeller blade. That's awesome

this is so insane lol. love it . your content is always next level

That hand too a pretty good beating

The snail housing: i only know of the ones that have a very small outer diameter directly behind the exit (rotation wise). Due to the same diameter much of the air gets just spun around in circle until the centrifugal forces prevent it from making the turn. Hmm... thats probably the diffrence, between max flow or max pressure on the outlet. Yours is probably set up for pressure. You can try to balance the impeller statically by mounting it to a thin needle and place that on a post. That should reduce friction and should turn the impeller with the heavy side down.

Maybe you could make your impellers more resistant by metal coating them with electrolysis. The thin metal coat adds a lot of resistance.

If the motor was on the intake side with larger inlet that allows / forces the airflow around the outside of the motor it could cool itself down while it draws in the air. 🤔😉👍 Those resin printed parts look absolutely amazing.

Interesting. Turbochargers are dynamically balanced and run to much higher rpm. I ran a 110 mm compressor wheel on a schwitzer turbo and recorded over 120krpm. There was/is (?) a UK company called TurboTechnics who build turbocharger balancing machines. From memory (it's been a while since I did any engine development work) the balancing is normally done as a cut on the 'nose' of the wheel, probably because that's the only bit you can get to on a fully assembled turbo. I'm not sure what speed they use when balancing but both the compressor and the turbine get balanced. It may be that the parts are individually balanced first, then balanced again after assembly.

Please, please do a deep dive on magneto hydrodynamics… your the only one that will go down a rabbit hole and come back with answers!!😊

Use the durable resing for the housing It will dampen the vibration

"It didn't blow up! Woohoo!" - RCTestFlight, 2024

The howtobasic-style hammering at the beginning made me chuckle :D

A disk of weight behind the impeller to act as a flywheel will improve the reciprocating motion and reduce vibration. A bigger housing encapsulating the electric motor should aid cooling and any heat inside the pressurized area will help thrust by expanding the volume of air, even if only marginally.

Wow Never new that pcbway could Machine big parts

I used to work in a Turbo shop, and you can properly balance an impeller with a prop balancer. You would know the ones: they magnetically levitate the Prop/fan on a shaft for almost zero friction. Grab one of those to balance your impeller!

Balancing high rpm items seems like a very necessary step. I've looked at the some of the comments here for manual suggestions but expect there must be a 'hobby' way of doing it auto magically -perhaps even a 3D printed balancing machine? (I thought that if you marked a point on the circumference and measured the offset force with a piezo sensor then the maximum force would be generated at some time after that 'pulse' which if you divided the rotation interval into 360 units would give you the angle after the point that the maximum deflection occurred, you could then shave a bit off this point... Max frequency would have to be, say, 360 x 100,000rpm = 36MHz and you would need some pretty fast A/D to get a force value, although perhaps could just use a threshold detector??) Thoughts?

"It is loud, inefficient, and it is likely to explode." I think with that you've offically crossed the line into Mad Science.

have really enjoyed your videos thus far...cool colab with the plasma channel...

Gives me an idea of the production problems that Dyson would have had in developing their vacuums. And they would have had to mass produce them leading to some of their design decisions.

whoo! Look at that! *GOES WILD WITH A HAMMER*

One way of using the dyson impeller is making something more like a jet engine, you might get more of a ram effect and air multiplication if the exhaust is made right

3:10 I got a free sample of formlabs printing capabilities a few years ago. It was a sample of filament that can be used for springy things

You Are Amazing! Thank You.

Congratulations on getting 3 different sponsors in one video

I never could figure out Kv. This cleared up years of confusion lol

Dyson uses a reluctance motor according to my research. Rather than permanent magnets, the rotating core just has a magnetic material like iron that seeks to center itself in a magnetic field. It works like a familiar linear solenoid but in rotation. There is no field reversal in the iron so this supposedly gives an RPM advantage.

Not that it's relevant here but FWIW, your "5 HP" vacuum cleaner does not have a 5 HP motor. It would draw well north of 20A of current. 746W = 1 HP --> 746*5 = 3730W. 3730W/120V = 31A. That assumes 100% efficiency. On a different note, this is a really cool vid. It's nice to see how you can take a vacuum cleaner motor and propel an airplane. Keep up the good work.

This feels like it was built to spare dysons feelings.