I actually like the look of the CX-90 better. Was anyone really complaining about the 3-row having too many seats? That Soul Red looks mighty tasty though.

@DeeEllEff

7 күн бұрын

Did you miss the observation that external looks (down to Premium paint selections like Melting Copper and Soul Red Crystal Metallics) are totally identical between these two. You’re obviously free to like & prefer whatever you choose; but let’s not pretend that the CX-70 and CX-90 are different.

I think it's a good vehicle and a great alternative to what is out there already. The only weirdness is the name when it's just about identical to the 90.

@EVPulse

Ай бұрын

From a marketing standpoint I get it, but from a product I’d just get the -90 and call it a day. - Chad

@EVPulse

Ай бұрын

Also appreciate you watching. In the Midwest we’d say “you’re good people.”

@ALMX5DP

Ай бұрын

Yeah it definitely makes sense in that respect, but I agree that having the seats is a no brainer since it’s not any additional cost and the cubbies aren’t super useful anyways.

@ALMX5DP

Ай бұрын

@@EVPulse and of course! Always appreciate solid content and reasonable automotive perspectives.

@DeeEllEff

7 күн бұрын

⁠​⁠@@ALMX5DP Being an older, non-married male with a dog, I have zero need for the extra seats (nor that bit of weight). I do wish that the Premium trim on the CX-70 was $200-$300 cheaper than the same trim on the 3-row CX-90; makes sense. (I like that the CX-90 anomalies have mostly been addressed.)