wow ... .that's awesome brief explanation...i loved it....👍

A well versed explained

Great work thank you

Thank you🙏 I will watch this later

I translated the court introduction in Urdu language in December 2016. Please send me this video if anybody has.

very useful

Unfortunately, or fortunately, last November (2017) Britain was not represented in the ICJ for the first time that the 5 permanent members are not all represented in ICJ.

@rikybologna3579

4 жыл бұрын

The fact that the UNSC still having 5 permanent Members nowadays is so detrimental and demonstrates how much Ius Gentium needs to evolve itself even now.

very Informative

Great Job!!

prima! dank u

I edged to this

hand gestures on point!!

Who calls the ICJ a "World Court"?

@PUBLICcfcUSA

2 жыл бұрын

So what 😎👍

So why doesn't the United States and other interested nations take China into this ICJ and settle the South China Sea dispute?. or did they and we were not told of the outcome?

@rikybologna3579

4 жыл бұрын

Each Atates should make a unilateral declaration to official recognise the ICJ rule. Just stated this, the USA made its own one affirming that customary international law should be applied to them only despite conventional one, that can be applied if all Parts of a treaty are the very same ones of a dispute. Overall, this may become an advantage or a disadvantage according to the particular dispute rulled. Thus, universal accepted customary international law (opinio iuris sive necessitatis + diuturnitas of the majority of Intermational Community's States) is not providing enough to solve what you mentioned about China probably.

I seen an introduction to the international court of justice.

oath! Loves it!!