I had a 95 Cutlass Ciera twenty plus year ago. I traded it with a little over 80000 miles. That car used to plow through the snow. Fast forward to now...I just bought one for $1600 with 22,000 original miles a week ago. I love it!

Thanks for posting...brought back memories of when I was sixteen driving my Aunt's 1990 with the 3.3, man that thing was fast!

second care ive bought, and probably my last. mine is a year older, with the cut off speedometer.. love this car, it may not look attractive to many other people, but each time i see it, it gets more beautiful. got mine last year, only 60k miles. owner before had it sitting in the sun for years, so had to repaint the gunmetal grey trunk, but while i was doing that, i added a spoiler from a 2013 ford, haha- looks awesome i might add. a month ago it was missing gears, found out the plug wires were sun baked, brittle to the touch, so replaced them, put brand new plugs in, and while i was at it- a new fuel filter- runs better then the day i got it- such low gas mileage, and fun to drive. It doesn't happen to be my dream car, but it fits what kind of style i like in my most favored cars- looks like a normal car, but can beat the hell out of your jerry rigged rice cooker. lol

Great ride! My grandmother had an '86 Cutlass Ciera and I currently drive my grandfather's red 1990 Buick LeSabre w/ only 61,000 miles. These GMs are incredible, and I hope to never get rid of my car.

One thing thats nice about these. is the comfy seats. Sweet car!

I jut bought the same car for 1,200. It has 364,554 miles on it. And it is so spotless and clean inside it looks brand new

@Thevacomaticvacuumcorner

7 жыл бұрын

cannot beat a oldsmobile

I had an 89 in high school (2002). It was grey and got stolen from the mall parking deck. Recovered later trashed beyond repair.

I had a ‘93 Pontiac GA with the 3300 LG7. That engine was beautiful. I did a complete top end rebuild, was amazed at the design of the internals... Bulletproof, except for the plastic bits. And at about 2000 rpm sounded like a small V8, haha. I miss that engine

The Enterprise, that's the best fitting description..Man there will be all the Lambos and Porches in the world and she will still be my favorite car ever, and no I'm no old fart I'm 26.

I have typically hated every front wheel drive I ever drove. don't usually even like the looks of them. but these cieras I did like. to drive they a comfortable, good on gas, and don't look like modern toasters or cheese wedge cars

Have a 94 Ciera 3.1 Love it You’ve got a gem in that 90 Touring model Better motor than this 94

Awesome Car

I had 89 cutlass ciera , it was nice

Love them Ciera's i had a 84 3.0 and a 86 2.8 and i have 85 pontiac 6000 2.5 runs great and slow does the job though!

This car has more options than my 96 Ciera SL. That storage compartment behind the rear seats is pretty neat. Mine has the 3100 3.1 V6.

Legendary car

One of my dream cars too

my dad is fixing our 88 with a 3.8l engine and i tell ya this when i drove this thing ITS A BEAST seriously it's awesome comfortable and the only thing that made it perfect is if would be a rwd car othet than that ITS perfect

What the hell I thought I left a comment on this. Anyways Im surprised it has a full gauge cluster, I dont think I have seen one of these with this kind, always the long speedometer gauge, but Ive never really payed too much attention either. The gas mileage is good too.

Getting one today ;)

The 2.5 has 92-HP, The 2.8 has 125-HP, and the 3.0 has 112-HP the Most powerfull was the 3.3 with 160-HP and the 3.8 had 150-HP.

Figure out your gas mileage old school, top off the tank, notate the mileage, stop and top off the tank at the end of the trip, divide mileage by the gallons of the second fill up and you got your avg. mileage for the trip. One of the joys of owning a ciera. I have a 150 buck, 1989 ciera myself.

Got one yesterday and love it, there's a short vid on my channel

@electric6877

6 жыл бұрын

Brutuz62 same

Had a '90 with international package and 3300, drove it to death, got another and did the same, a '91 with the 3100. First was better but miss them both. Head gaskets. Loved the airplane cluster and steering wheel without the huge airbag. Still got this one?

Sure wish my 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera SL had the full guage cluster with tachometer. All mine has is the speedometer, fuel guage, and temperature guage.

I always wanted one of those cutlass or century or pontiac 6000 or even the celebrity love those cars BTW did you buy it ?

what a hot rod

👍💟🤩🤩

torsion beam rear axle, makes for shitty ride and handling but its very simple. would be interested in seeing somebody hotrod it.

The startup is @5:03

im thinking about getting a 94 ciera with a 4 cylinder engine. do you think that a ciera with a 4 cylinder engine is any good

I just bought one with 99000 miles on it

My cig drawer does the same thing haha, 90 cutlass ciera s

lol just found out my moms old cutlass cruiser was not a 2.8 that i always thought it was , nope its a 3.0 is there a difference the power torque is about he same 120 the buick 3.0 is better huh?

watch out for the mass airflow sensor going out on these 3.3 engines mine had around 160k on it when it happened.

@RicersRUs

10 жыл бұрын

I just got a mint condition 93 Ciera with 90k on it. Thanks for the heads up!.

@ericrichards7562

6 жыл бұрын

a mass airflow sensor going out is something happens on all modern cars. one thing for sure the ciera will still run when about every car built today will be crushed

@panikrev175

2 жыл бұрын

Two Phillips screws and some sensor-safe intake cleaner/maf cleaner, some of the easiest maintenance you can do yourself. Never needed it but, on the 3300 it’s so robust and easy to do why wouldn’t you... even the idle air control valve is easy to get at.... this motor was a mechanic’s dream to work on.

@stephenandloriyoung5716

Жыл бұрын

@@panikrev175 As a mechanic, yes and no. Changing the serpentine belt, for instance, is easy. I'd rather do a dozen of them on Cutlass 3.3s than one on most other vehicles. But changing the front valve cover gasket is a much bigger deal than it should be.Good engine, though, and good on fuel.

It's best to avoid the 4-cylinder models if possible. While they provide good economy, they simply can't provide adequate power for a car of this size and weight. You may save some, but are always penalized with puny performance. The V6 versions are much smoother and more satisfying, providing ample torque for both off-the-line acceleration and highway passing.

you forgot 2.2 and was that carbed 2.8 or fi 2.8?

That’s exactly what I said when I came back after test driving it, “omg I love this” I couldn’t fcking stop smiling 😂

or a olds 88 touring edition digital gauges

when was that?

if it was me i would go for the 3.3 v6 0ffered in the 89-93 160 hp 19-29 mpg maybe even more with 4 speed auto the 2.2 offered in the 94-96 is good for 120 hp which isnt bad and returns 25-31 mpg but there is only a 3 speed auto in my opinion the 4cyl doesnt match the power and build quality of the 3.3 the 3.1 is ok but isnt perfect the 3.3 is much better

my dream car is a cutlass cruiser with 3.3 or 3.8

@stephenandloriyoung5716

Жыл бұрын

I guess I'm "livin' the dream." Our 91 Cutlass Cruiser "woodie wagon" was parked on the street the other day, and a woman asked if it was for sale. "It's my six year old daughter's dream car." she said. Does that make it a chick magnet?

2.2 120-HP the early 2.8 carb had 112 the later h.o 2.8 carb had 125-HP same as the fuel injected which is what i had

19-30 mpg ????

Fully Loaded Ciera for that price, i woulda jumped on it

FE3 is a rare bird

Mine has an aftermarket head unit

Are the older ones still OK ? Or are the newer ones better ? Don't know the difference in the 3.3 and 3.1

@orangie84

8 жыл бұрын

+scully These olds are awesome cars.. although they did suffer a bit from 1985 to 1988.. Olds didn't do so good for some reason.. But then they 89's came out and they put out good cars again from that point out.. Olds was always known for the soft ride and extremely comfortable seats.. so I would suggest either getting an olds from before 85 or 84 or from 89 and after as they really are good cars...

We have 2 of theis car in our house

Thumbs up if you laughed when he pulled the ashtray

dream car?? I have an 87 century if you're interested lol

0:32-0:39

is the 1991 version of this the same, buying one as my first car

@martinalvares4455

8 жыл бұрын

these cars are beautiful dude I have a cutlass ciera 89 with the 2.8 engine it's just awesome

@lmperialSoldier

8 жыл бұрын

David Alvarez the guy forgot to mention a couple problems with the car in the ad, i ended up with an 2003 impala. its a shame i really liked this car

@martinalvares4455

8 жыл бұрын

+james .crowley well I have no problems with mine I tell you that the only problem my car haves is the paint job is getting ripped I'm thinking to send it to a body shop just for a new paint job and fix some dent's that the car haves nothing to expensive. the course control works fine my air conditioner works the power windows, power steering wheel, and maybe my car is running like brand new my mileage on the dash board only marks 230,000 miles so it's still in good shape the engine has never been repaired or my transmission has never been open I change my engine oil every 4,000 miles and my transmission oil every 7,000 or 8,000 and how do I know that the car is good well it's because my dad got that car brand new and he told me how to take care to that car he told me when I started high school here take the keys it's yours he stopped using it because he now haves a Dodge RAM 2004 but really I love the car and it's 10 years older than me but I think old cars are much much better than these new cheap plastic cars those chevy Malibu Ford fiesta the Chevrolet equinox all those cars from 2006 up to this day are garbage compared to the good old cars. good luck to find a good cutlass ciera I really recommend you to find it and thount the 2003 impala haves the same 3.1 engine with the same 4 gears W/over drive transmission?

@lmperialSoldier

8 жыл бұрын

David Alvarez his spoiled daughter had no idea how to maintain a car, she didn't like driving a used car so when her dad bought her a brand new car she left hers to rot. massachusetts winters can take a toll on any car

@martinalvares4455

8 жыл бұрын

+james .crowley oh that's a shame these cars are awesome these ones are not cars that you let them die just for a new car

0:33 typical oldsmobile

@jodyb3491

5 жыл бұрын

Yeah, they all do that. Stupid ashtray in an unkillable car

Its not 1990 its 1992 or more

I feel sorry for you kids today. You never got the chance to drive or own any real cool/fast cars, like a 55 T bird or 59 triumph tr3 or 65 mustang gt convertible or 74 nova or 85 cutlass, sorry just reminiscing a bit. The cars they are dumping on you today are expensive, poorly built, hard to repair plastic crap. I had a new 1989 cutlass ciera v6 (pokey, crappy built old man's trolley). If you want a cheap fast car. Get a crown vic, mercury marquis or lincoln town car. They are a dime a dozen, dual overhead cam v8 (there's a reason cops always bought them). Well built (think taxi cab), and easy to repair (full frame, rear wheel drive) with lots of space. Gary in Michigan (64 years old and still hot rodding). And Yes we are goingdownthetubes. lol

@highwatercircutrider

9 жыл бұрын

Some of the newer cars are capable of many,many miles. I have an 89' Ford ranger 4 cyl. 5spd. that currently has 365,000 miles on it's original trans and engine. My cousin's father bought it new, so I know the mileage is correct. I had to replace the rear end about 3 or 4 years ago, the truck starts and runs reliably up here in Michigan's cold winters (it is -6 degrees as I type this). I just bought a 97 Honda civic with 260,00 miles. It runs perfect and has a rust free body (rare in Michigan), for $1,400. I figure if it ran that far it will run much farther. I sold my Chevy K1500 ,an 92 model with 450,000 miles on two engines, rebuilt trans and rear end. the difference in today' cars is simply this and they are pretty much the same, brand wise: A. none of them will be rebuildable in 30-40 years (plastics). B. they have extremely difficult, and complicated systems to repair (computers scattered all over). C. very, very cramped spaces to work in (many requiring engine and trans removal for bigger repairs). D. body's today last a long time 15-20 years as opposed to 5-10 years in times past. But cars today all look the same and are boring! with just a few exceptions.

@demoskunk

8 жыл бұрын

+highwatercircutrider I agree up to a point. American cars sucked through most of the 70s, the 80s and 90s. But cars built in the last decade or so will outperform classic cars in EVERY category. Modern cars require less maintenance, last a lot longer, handle, brake and accelerate much better, not to mention modern cars' passenger cells are a lot stronger and handle crashes MUCH better. The only thing classic GM cars have over modern ones is styling.

@scottkiddy542

5 жыл бұрын

The old cars (50's, 60's, 70's) definitely have a cool factor that new cars do not have, but talk to any "old timer" and they will tell you that any car from that era was ready for the junk yard by the time it had 75,000 miles on it. Cars were not built to last in those days. Today, pretty much any car (with reasonable care) will make it to 200,000+ miles. They are also safer, better on gas and the environment, and in many cases, faster. Your average v6 family car has better 0-60 times and 1/4 times than a 60's muscle car.

not enough good video, the

you forgot 2.2 and was that carbed 2.8 or fi 2.8?