1972 CHEVROLET PICK-UP TRUCK vs. FORD MODELS CHEVY BLAZER GENERAL MOTORS PROMOTIONAL FILM 19324
Want to support this channel and help us preserve old films? Visit / periscopefilm
Browse our products on Amazon: amzn.to/2YILTSD
Made in 1972 for General Motors, this film shows the full line of Chevrolet pick-up trucks and gives salesmen and potential customers insight into the line's durability and value. As the film states, almost 56% of Chevy trucks made in the 1950s were still in service in the early 1970s thanks to their rugged design. At 1:25, the Nationwide Consumer Institute tests the truck versus a comparable Ford pick-up. At 2:11 a demonstration of the double steel cab strength. At 2:28 the box wall of the inner truck bed wall is shown. At 3:15 the truck's splash guard is shown. At 4:05 the shock absorber design is examined and then the exhaust system (4:38). At 4:43 the master brake cylinder and brakes are shown in head-to-head comparison. At 5:25 the disc braking systems are examined on a long, steep grade on Pike's Peak, where they crush the rival drum brakes. At 7:25 a TV commercial excerpt shows how the suspension system limits vibration to the forward area of the truck. At 8:05 the Chevy stabilizer bar is shown. At 8;25 a Chevy truck pulls a huge 747 jet aircraft. At 8:58 Chevy trucks are shown on the ranch, in service delivering goods, and more.
At 9:56 the film has special information for Chevy personnel about the Chevy Blazer. The vehicle is compared to a 4-wheel drive rival -- the Ford Bronco. The Blazer is equipped with truck components that give it an edge including in a tug-of-war at 11:30. At 11:55 the Blazer tows a trailer vs. the Bronco. At 12:18 the film shows the Blazer riding on a dirt road and off-road. At 12:50 a Camping and Trailering Guide magazine endorsement is mentioned. The interior of the vehicle is shown and then compared to the Bronco. At 14:10 the Blazer's disc brakes are shown in action vs. the drum brakes on the Bronco, which drifts into danger. At 15:23 the convertible aspect of the vehicle is shown.
We encourage viewers to add comments and, especially, to provide additional information about our videos by adding a comment! See something interesting? Tell people what it is and what they can see by writing something for example: "01:00:12:00 -- President Roosevelt is seen meeting with Winston Churchill at the Quebec Conference."
This film is part of the Periscope Film LLC archive, one of the largest historic military, transportation, and aviation stock footage collections in the USA. Entirely film backed, this material is available for licensing in 24p HD, 2k and 4k. For more information visit www.PeriscopeFi...
Пікірлер: 431
I wish car manufacturers would make a simple bad ass vehicle like this again. No computers. No digital screens. No cameras or all the extra crap you dont need. Just an affordable bad ass tool for the job. I'd buy it
@johncilia7696
Жыл бұрын
Gov square heads wont let them because of all the green BS.
@johnstudd4245
8 ай бұрын
Now days they try to sell us vehicles we don't want, loaded with crap we don't want but have to buy. I ordered and bought a New Ford Ranger 4x4 in 1984. At that time you could order the truck with every option separately. Just exactly what you wanted and nothing you did not want. Out the door for $10,000. You could order vehicles in this way in the 1960's. Back in the "pencil and paper days". But now, in the computer age......and instant communication....we can't, its to difficult, according to the auto makers.
@paulradice3534
6 ай бұрын
Thank the EPA. Unelected bureaucrats deciding what kind of vehicle is best suited for You.
@zzoinks
16 минут бұрын
@@paulradice3534they're "elected" by the presidents we vote in. Not directly though, but you can say the same about electing the president as that depends on the electoral college votes in the end. Now I'm curious what actions would be considered reasonable by an agency tasked with a general purpose like environmental protection. Congress has granted them the power to make the decisions. I forget the exact terms for an agency's mission vs decisions in support of it (maybe some term like legislative policy). But the EPA has a mission to protect our environment and thus our health, so I think it's unfair to say they're malevolent unelected bureaucrats when they're making the decisions to advance that mission. There can be a better way, maybe you want more oversight over their decisions or some scientific requirement. (It seems a change of administration can drastically change the behavior of an agency, even though it's the same agency with the same mission, so clearly the agency has soms political influence on it despite being scientific in design) As an example the Supreme Court ruled that the national traffic safety agency has a duty to protect drivers, so when Reagan administration instructed the agency to remove seat belt requirements, the Supreme Court prevented that as it was an abdication of the agency's duty and mission to protect drivers.
@zzoinks
8 минут бұрын
@@paulradice3534it is also tariffs, as America doesn't have many foreign small trucks due to the chicken tax.
I love how in a different time, they didn’t have “tech” to differentiate their trucks from the competition, they actually had to prove that they were superior, it’s almost like they had to care about their customers
I’m about 90% done doing a frame off restoration on a ‘68 K20. I can’t wait until it’s done! 🇺🇸🏁
@trplpwr1038
5 жыл бұрын
We want pictures!!
@mikeyerke3920
5 жыл бұрын
trplpwr You have them Sir, just click on my picture and go to my channel! Love to hear from ya! Like and subscribe if you think I deserve it. LOL! 🔧
@georgeharleydavidsonrider156
4 жыл бұрын
Mike Yerke 👍👍🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
That settles it! I'm goin out and buying a brand spanking new 72" Chevy!!
@andymerk6017
3 жыл бұрын
I looove mine !
@trevorjameson3213
3 жыл бұрын
One of our neighbors has a '72 Chevy pickup, short bed, four wheel drive, that he bought new and still has it. And it's still in very nice condition. It's the two tone orange and white.
@leonrigdon2788
3 жыл бұрын
Of all the dozen pickups I've had in the past , the '72 C/10 is the I'd like to have back the most.
The ashtrays on these trucks were usually stuffed full of cigarette butts. Life in the 1970s.
@nobillclinton
4 жыл бұрын
good times
@MrTheHillfolk
4 жыл бұрын
Go in any department store back then , everyone's smokin and putting ciggies out on the ground
I could care less if it is a Chevy, Ford, Dodge etc.....as long as the damn thing runs when I need it. I will say, the 1972 model Chevy was one of the best body styles GM ever put out
@Gpacharlie
4 жыл бұрын
It still isn’t a classic like the 72 Ford.
@seththomas9105
4 жыл бұрын
@@Gpacharlie The 1938-1972 GM trucks were some of the best looking designs ever.
@donaldkinder6716
4 жыл бұрын
@@Gpacharlie 67 too 72 ford cab mounts rod out truck fall too the frame, then steering colum breaks biggest pos trucks going ford?
@CasperRc81
4 жыл бұрын
Donald Kinder how about the radius arm tower rivets working loose so your whole front end shifts and pops on braking
@rubiconnn
4 жыл бұрын
Brand loyalty is the dumbest thing ever. All companies release good and awful cars.
I really enjoy your wonderful work Periscope Flims!!! Thank you for these historical gems!!!!
@PeriscopeFilm
5 жыл бұрын
Love our channel? Consider supporting what we do! Help us save and post more orphaned films! Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/PeriscopeFilm Even a really tiny contribution can make a difference.
@20alphabet
5 жыл бұрын
I 2nd that!
GM needs to return to making truck's, not car's with boxes on the back.
@samduran5180
4 жыл бұрын
Lol are talking about aluminum cars
@jordanwaughtal7649
4 жыл бұрын
@@samduran5180 no. Crew cab heated and cooled seats. Bose audio. All power windows. Plastic trim and bumper. Chinsey hardware.
@20alphabet
4 жыл бұрын
Not as long as they hire homosexuals for top management.
@djangoapple8230
4 жыл бұрын
I liked the original Chevy car with a box. El Camino.
@jordanwaughtal7649
4 жыл бұрын
@@20alphabet I think the old school term is sodomites.
Love these old commercials. Maybe because everything seem to be simpler looking back.
@johnstudd4245
8 ай бұрын
It was simpler then. Auto companies these days are a joke. And you can also thank the govt for their regulations and required fuel economy standards.
The long held tradition of dropping things on Ford trucks
@20alphabet
4 жыл бұрын
Fix Or Repair Daily
@robertstetson4077
4 жыл бұрын
Back then they can actually justify the commercials cus Chevys were made reliably and not the piles of shit they are today
@tskraj3190
4 жыл бұрын
@@robertstetson4077 I wish I could say the same for Ford but they've never built a reliable truck.
@captainamericaamerica8090
4 жыл бұрын
@@tskraj3190 Liar! There's many old ford's still in service.many.
@john8201
4 жыл бұрын
Timothy Isenhart yeah there are a lot more old fords on the road than chebys
My '68 C-10 is still running and road worthy. I've had many offers for it, but it's not for sale.
@TiborRoussou
4 жыл бұрын
Gave my son my 70 Chevy Longhorn; first year of the 402 big block, 8.5 ft box, 3/4 ton, 3 gas tanks, Dana 60 rear end all built on a 67 one ton frame ! I still don't think he truly deserves it ;)
@ConsolidatedPBY
4 жыл бұрын
I had a '72 C-10, the last year for that classic Chevy style. Bought it for $800 in '85, sold it in '98 for $1,500. Lord knows what it's worth now. I kick myself for sure as it was one of the biggest mistakes I ever made selling it. I think I sold it because it only got about 8-10 mpg loaded or empty, LOL. It was a gold colored solid steel beauty, 2WD, bias ply tires, 350 V8, with a 4 speed standard. First gear was a real low granny. I did upgrade to new wheels and radials and it really improved the ride. If I still had this truck I'm thinking it would sell for $8,000 or better. If I win the lottery I'm gonna buy another!
@clayton5229
2 ай бұрын
@@TiborRoussouyou are the best for that man!
When you could open the hood and see daylight even with a 454 in the bay. Also, no computers.
@flight2k5
4 жыл бұрын
What’s wrong with computers?
@xeong5
4 жыл бұрын
@@flight2k5 Boomers can't even type. What do you expect.
@mcsquigilnugets6603
3 жыл бұрын
@@flight2k5 As a younger guy who likes to work on cars and trucks, it’s easier and more enjoyable to work on older vehicles because they’re simple.
@flight2k5
3 жыл бұрын
@@mcsquigilnugets6603 but that’s your opinion. Not a fact.
@dyer2cycle
2 жыл бұрын
@@flight2k5 ..they have no d@mned business in a vehicle!..especially a truck!...
Back when the gas tank was inside the cab, right behind the seat.
@TiborRoussou
4 жыл бұрын
My 70 had one behind the seat and two outside the frame rails; it was a Chevy Longhorn ;)
@seththomas9105
4 жыл бұрын
@@TiborRoussou My 46 GMC has it right UNDER the front seat.
@TiborRoussou
4 жыл бұрын
@@seththomas9105 Under the seat, interesting.
@glennredwine289
4 жыл бұрын
@@seththomas9105 Have you ever tried putting on barbeque sauce you'll need it if you get T-boned!!
@glennredwine289
4 жыл бұрын
@@TiborRoussou Same thing as I said to Seth Thomas you should keep some BBQ sauce in your glove box to put on yourself if you get into an accident.
The glory days of chevy
@derrickjackson6737
4 жыл бұрын
Nothing but Chevys 💪 power
@joed5472
3 жыл бұрын
Not today
@galiffrey1
3 жыл бұрын
Yeah with offerings like the new blazer crossover chevy is dead now.
Fords twin I beam suspension? Every time you put a load in the box it would change the front end alignment. You were lucky to get ten thousand miles from a set of tires!
@20alphabet
5 жыл бұрын
True. Ford had a better idea, but I guess they went with the cheaper one instead. Lol
@anthonynelson9136
5 жыл бұрын
@@20alphabet I think in the old days to adjust the camber they had to bend the I beam.
@scottymoondogjakubin4766
5 жыл бұрын
Anthony Nelson my uncles 79 f350. Steering was so bad i got pulled over numerous times for probable dui ! 😆
@20alphabet
5 жыл бұрын
@@anthonynelson9136 They did.
@cabbyhubby
5 жыл бұрын
Ain't they still producing the twin I beam?
I still have my '72 Ford F-100 4x4, bought it used and was my high school vehicle back in th 90's.
@steveevans424
5 жыл бұрын
SWEET !
@Gpacharlie
5 жыл бұрын
Daniel C And you have an overwhelming desire to sell it to me. And you have an overwhelming desire to sell it to me. And you have an overwhelming desire to sell it to me.
@lukestrawwalker
4 жыл бұрын
Keep it... best truck you could ever buy... new one's can't hold a candle to them for longevity!!! Take care of it she'll run forever... OL J R :)
@topfuel6824
4 жыл бұрын
It’s true the old fords was built to last the new ford truck will make you a Chevy man
@scoobyroorogers
4 жыл бұрын
@@topfuel6824 No way! The chevy truck of today is overpriced and such a piece of shit.
Hay look teenagers actually helping and no cell phones insight
@chargermaster3716
4 жыл бұрын
Michael Hendrix Only a CB radio
@flight2k5
4 жыл бұрын
Says the guy the responded on a cell phone 🤣😂
@Sebastian_Dinwiddie
4 жыл бұрын
Michael Hendrix that’s because data was so expensive 😉
The dummy test had me rofl
Have a 73 short box f100 and wouldn't trade it for every Chevy on the lot! I like my 73 Chevy even with the body rust. Both good trucks👌
@bobbyheffley4955
3 жыл бұрын
Does it have a 240 straight 6, 302 V8, 360 V8, or 390 V8?
@christopherbeasley9998
3 жыл бұрын
@@bobbyheffley4955 it has the 360 .. with factory AC..
My first pickup was a 72 Chevy C 10 with helper springs .
This Chevrolet's exhaust system is made of double wall alumanized steel!......of which the inner wall rusts and collapses and blocks off the exhaust flow leaving everyone, including your favorite mechanic scratching their head wondering why the truck won't run.
@scoobyroorogers
4 жыл бұрын
Ha!! So so true
@jimmyers8939
4 жыл бұрын
if a mechanic can't figure out an exhaust blockage then they aren't worth a shit.
"Aluminized exhaust that resists corrosion"... glad there was ONE part of the Chevy's of that era that wouldn't rust LOL:) Dad had a '72 Chevy pickup... it was a pretty good pickup, plenty of power, just a 350 with a three on the three standard transmission IIRC, but boy did that thing rust... the fenders rusted, the cab rusted, it looked like Swiss cheese by the time he traded it off. Another problem was they used stupid coil springs and long bars for rear suspension-- thing would squat on its spurs and bottom out REAL easy when you put a decent size load in the bed compared to a Ford... Dad finally had enough and traded it off on a new '77 Ford because the floorboard was completely rusted out under the doors and beside the seats-- you could see clean through to the ground! The back corners of the cab had rotted off behind the doors, the top of the cab roof where it joins the pillars was rusting through, and the front and rear fenders looked like Swiss cheese... Chevy might have had "double panels" back then but they were using recycled steel from old tin cans and so the trucks simply rotted away in no time, and we were down south in Texas where they DON'T salt the roads in winter-- hate to think how they'd rot up north after being exposed to winter road salt! That said, Chevy was ahead of the curve on the front disc brakes-- HUGE improvement over the drum brakes that hung around too long on Fords... Disk brakes give much better heat dissipation and stopping power, resistance to brake fade and of course are MUCH more resistant to water intrusion since they just sling the water off the rotors, where drums trap the water... even so, anybody who's ever driven a HD truck (2 ton or up, which are pretty much ALL drum brakes even to this day) knows if you drive through water, you drive fairly slow and "drag the brakes" by applying light pressure to the pedal for a bit after you get out of the water to generate heat in the brakes to dry out the drums and get rid of the water... otherwise you step on the brakes and the trapped water on the inside surface of the drum simply "hydroplanes" the brake shoes and your stopping distance goes up a ton... Later! OL J R :)
@seththomas9105
4 жыл бұрын
I'm a GM guy but your right about the rust part, these bodies rusted terrible up here in Iowa, but so did the Fords and Dodges TBH. the 73-77ish seemed to be better on cab rust but the boxes on those were notorious for turning to Swiss cheese in ten years.
@lukestrawwalker
4 жыл бұрын
@@seththomas9105 yeah agree... We had a 77 Suburban we bought used in the late 80's for a farm truck... That 454 automatic would pull like a team of wild bulls, and pass everything but a gas station... Why we eventually had to sideline it-- simply drank too much gas, which got real expensive in the run up to the first Gulf War.... I was gonna get it running again after being parked again and it was rusting away to badly, the body was turning to Swiss cheese, the rear C pillars were nearly completely gone... Shame really because it was a great truck otherwise... My brother put the 454 into his 79 El Camino, which he later sold... Later! OL J R
@402tyler8
Жыл бұрын
my 70 c10 has coils in the back and you cant put anything back there without it squatting, but it rides like a dream. i also have a 72 c20 that has leafs in the back and that truck is an absolute work horse. i agree with you on the rust part though, luckily the metal is cheap!
Cool, back when vehicles where over built with solid heavy components that last and take abuse. Nothing like the flimsy shit boxes of today.
@bgd73
5 жыл бұрын
I did notice the real 16 gauge in action. Oddly enough, that ford that failed the forklift is still thicker than today. I weld the poop out of my 1996 gmc...but it is deserving it. 377k miles in the north.
@flight2k5
4 жыл бұрын
You’re an idiot 😂🤣
I'm still running my 72 Longhorn.
7:33 LOL That’s how I looked when I drove my Ford Ranger, it was a rough ride!
I'm a Ford guy and have been all my life. First truck was a Ford 100 explorer with a 390 V8 back in my HS days. Kept it 10 years and sold it because I moved to Japan.
@alangee79010
5 жыл бұрын
@Randy Wiesendanger explain yourself on your post.
@alangee79010
5 жыл бұрын
@Randy Wiesendanger I was in the service and so I had little say over low standards and or rice burners. Events👍
@joejoe493
4 жыл бұрын
You do know he’s not talking about the suv explorer in the 90s. He’s talking about the old pickups right?
@alangee79010
4 жыл бұрын
@@joejoe493 yes, my motor was a 390. Mostly all cars in 1970's & 80's were junk regarding the big 3. Sad because they had the knowledge and became totally complacent.
@alangee79010
4 жыл бұрын
@Randy Wiesendanger Nope you've got that covered already. Good for you that you believe bow ties are the best. Isn't that why there are choices? My company truck is a 1 ton Dodge and it does a function and I wouldn't take it home if they gave me the keys.
17:08 Yes that does look like someone is having fun!
7:28 haha that's a nice Sunday drive
I like both the Blazer and the Bronco. They just look cool.
The days of " TONKA TUFF " Chevy Pick Ups.
This is when GM made really good automobiles. Today, well, the politicians seem to be happy with them. GM caters to the politicians, not customers.
@albertmcmichael9110
4 жыл бұрын
GM stands for Government Moters!
@indridcold8433
4 жыл бұрын
@@albertmcmichael9110 It markets for government motors because they try to satisfy politicians, not customers. But it builds like garbage motors. None of that ugly junk is going to last long. They look like garbage as well as are put together like garbage. Thus we have Garbage Motors built for the Government. G²M should be the née name. We now know what G² stands for.
the next time i need to move my 747 to the other side of the yard,i'll have to remember this.i do love the body style of the 67-72 trucks though.if you can get past having the steering wheel 2 feet from the dash.gm' early substitute for an air bag.it may crush your chest,but will keep your face out of the windsheild in a wreck.
Boy those are highly collectible now! And beautiful May I add!👌😎👍love that blazer! Too bad the new blazer doesn’t even resembles a real blazer anymore! Is just a name! They’ve should have never had called the new one a blazer!
Anyone else think it would fun to ride in the dummy seat once.
@jaredbarhorst248
3 жыл бұрын
Aside from the brain damage, it would be fun!
Buen comercial de los 60 70 me imagino 👍😁 buenos vehículos
Chevrolet was really something back then unlike now
@trevorjameson3213
3 жыл бұрын
They sure were. But Chevy also produced some good trucks from '89-'98, and again from '99-'05. I had a '91 that I bought new, and it was great. I drove it until '05 when I bought a new Chevy truck, that I still drive today. I would not own a modern new one though.
I want a Blazer so much now. I’m sold!
@Rickswars
Жыл бұрын
Chevy is junk get the best get a Ford.
I see old Ford's and Chevy's on the road all the time, but I never see any "job rated" "army certified" Dodge's around. I do see the 80s and 90s one's alot though.
@jameshafner1442
4 жыл бұрын
My 1988 Dodge (5.2 litre), will be registered as my birthday gift in June. Not many left in New Hampshire.
Good thing they didn't use a 73 model year, things went downhill fast from then on.
@troyf374
5 жыл бұрын
yeah but they had disc brakes
@dominicoconner1973
5 жыл бұрын
Have to dis agree with you on that the square body trucks were one of the best truck chevy/GMC made.
@dominicoconner1973
5 жыл бұрын
@@troyf374 : LMAO they even showed the truck going downhill with the brakes being sprayed with water hoses. Poor choose of words Daniel Ginther.
@danielginther4879
5 жыл бұрын
@@dominicoconner1973 I didn't say anything about the disc brakes, go back and review the guy who did.
@danielginther4879
5 жыл бұрын
@@dominicoconner1973 whatever
8:00 my 73' camper special came stock with both front and rear sway bars
@ericw4279
3 жыл бұрын
I have an ‘83 K30 which I carry a huge camper on. Didn’t come stock with a rear sway bar but I added a big aftermarket one. Replaced all the bushings for the front bar too. It helped the sway but not as much as I hoped it would.
That dummy catching hell.
Allways owned Chevys no regrets at all but got to admit those old Ford trucks are also sexy not as reliable as chevys but still sexy
You ought to see the ford pickup truck commercials of the day, Those commercials were awesome
The US Military bought a lot of Blazers with V10 diesels and called them CUCV's. They could carry 5 people. Then someone decided the Hummer was a better idea. The Hummer only carried 4 people and couldn't go in narrow areas or climb steep slopes as well as the CUCV. I remember one Hummer that couldn't go through a standard street underpass. Seems Chevy and the government both changed about the same time (both for the worse).
@BuickParkAvenue
2 жыл бұрын
The 6.2 Detroit Diesel in the CUCV is a V8.
67-72 Chevy Trucks, the new breed. Best trucks GM ever made.
@dyer2cycle
2 жыл бұрын
..Yeah..only a six year run..wish they had made them at least till 73 or 74..just needed to do one more grill revamp...the 73-87 squarebodys are all-around good trucks, but they made them WAYY too long..I always begrudged that they made these trucks only 6 years, and the suarebodys 15 years..even longer for the Blazers, Suburbans, and crew cabs....
When those first generation Chevy K5 Blazers came out in 1969, the GMC Jimmys came out a year later. They replaced the previous panel trucks. 1972 was the last year for those first generation K5 Blazers & Jimmys & same with those second generation C/K series pickups & sixth generation Suburbans. Those first generation Ford Broncos were built from 1966 through 1977.
I miss my truck it wasn't 4wd but it was great my dad bought it new in 75 it was a Scottsdale painted white with black trim blue interior i have now got truck blood always running through my vaines Thank You GMC CHEVY😂😂😢😢
I couldn’t stop laughing at the dummy bouncing around. I laughed so hard I cried!
YAY 1972 my dad was born
@trplpwr1038
5 жыл бұрын
I graduated from HS and went in the military.
@edwardpate6128
5 жыл бұрын
Wow, your dad is a kid!
@horstebreedow8608
4 жыл бұрын
Me to
Awesome film. Can you re-post when you're finished with the audio restoration? This seems to be a first draft
The "other truck". Lol. I place no blame. I can't say the "f" word" either!!! Lol. Cool video!
BTW my 72 had no power assist, disc brakes NO POWER BRAKES LOL. Still that truck was a beast. 307 auto low gears, manual steering. Only options were the heavy springs auto trans and radio LOL
A drunk driver plowed into my 72 Cheyenne c20 while it was parked, the impact moved it about 4 feet forward and completely onto the sidewalk. Bumper was only bent and a little bit of the rear quarter panel. Frame completely unscathed
My 1971 GMC Jimmy is a little rough but it's been getting me to work the last 2 weeks in the snow 35 inch super swampers get it through the deep stuff, got the np205 and the granny 4 speed gotta love the old ones
17:07. I'm sold!
Back in the days when men were men!! If you had asked for a heated seat you'd get laughed out of the showroom..
Had the orange chevy.it was a beast.a beast.i miss it.not fair to compair the Blazer with the bronco.they were two different worlds that year.ive had both.bronco would go further off road.
@7:25 thats awesome
Is this the predecessor of J.D. power?
My 70 GMC C2500 was 50 years old last month.
Nowadays, and I kid you not, the US FTC would sue, harass, or block any manufacturer from doing comparisons with competitors, one reason you don't see comparative advertising anymore. Even court cases have held it's not easy to do comparative advertising in the USA. All in the name of TruthSpeak.
This is why all the older folks know so much about cars, cause they marketed them and informed the general public of what goes behind the truck. They demonstrated why their truck was better and gave all the engineering behind it. The people could truly decide for themselves which actually was better. And today’s commercials just show a family in a car and show that it backs in for you and their like, “this is why my family drives a Ford, this is safety.” And then the commercial ends. It’s boring and non informative. No wonder you see those people who’s cars are falling apart on the road today. Nobody, besides car people, care about or know much about their car nowadays. Also, can I please go buy myself a 1972 Chevy cause this sells me. Oh how I wish I could get one new now.
The tractor used for the testing was a Ford
@GenePoolChlorinator
5 жыл бұрын
I was starting to think that I was the only person who noticed that.
@cabbyhubby
5 жыл бұрын
Ford made good tractors!
@edwardpate6128
5 жыл бұрын
Well Fords normally being towed by a Chevy! LOL
@cullenserratore8797
4 жыл бұрын
JohnnyBDyer then why doesn’t Chevy make tractors? “LOL”
Best truck ever made
I find it interesting that sales literature often refers to the Blazer as a "personal car-truck" or Four wheel drive "car" - in a sense it was like a passenger car with the the backseat. Strictly speaking what is a 'truck' that has no separate cab from the distinct pickup box/body?
@CAROLDDISCOVER-FINDER2525
Жыл бұрын
A Chevy suburban is simply a station wagon on a truck chassis. I'm comparing a 62 Impala wagon I've got with a 75 suburban that I have two wheel drive. I guess soccer moms needed more room than Little League moms did. I'm not knocking suburban. I've had multiple suburbans over the years decades newer than that 75 I mentioned.
I would love to have been one of their test drivers. Lol. I bet they paid out a few settlements
I will Still take the 1972 Ford!! where can i order please.
The new Blazer can’t climb a curb... smh
Love these
Very Interesting!
I wish they still made these trucks and blazer. I would buy one today if they were on the lot beside these new ones they make.
If I ever move to USA, my new car will be either F150 or Silverado.
@20alphabet
5 жыл бұрын
Get an early 90s Silverado.
@daveb5041
5 жыл бұрын
@Old Iron Everything in this country is gone to sh!t now, why would you want to move to a country run by a complete moron who is screwing up everything?
@coltonjacobs5383
5 жыл бұрын
If you get an F150, make sure that it is a model that is newer than around 2011 or so. The previous years had a horrible engine in it that made them a bad choice. Also, do not get the “EcoBoost” engine that comes with any of the Ford vehicles, they are unreliable pieces of junk. If you want something older than the Ford, then get a Silverado from around 2006 to earlier years. GM(the company that owns Chevy and GMC) had a terrible quality drop due to their bankruptcy in 2009. All GM quality has been terrible since then, which is why I recommend Ford for the later years, and Chevy for the earlier years.
@edwardpate6128
5 жыл бұрын
Ram the best!
@chargermaster3716
4 жыл бұрын
Nermash Get the Ford F-150 GM quality control has been going downhill for decades now this video was made when GM and Ford were neck to to neck in quality control.
yah" we know chevy had the commercials. but ford had the trucks baby,,still got mine 75 f250,,,
Last year for that Chevy body style.
@bluegrassman3040
4 жыл бұрын
Edward Pate the next year was the rust bucket style...
@chargermaster3716
4 жыл бұрын
Josh Hunt all of them rusted
I wish American auto makers thought like this again instead of investing millions into figuring out how to make their vehicles fail just after the warranty is up.
I don't plan on dropping spikes on my roof anyway.
@chargermaster3716
4 жыл бұрын
CHARLES ATWELL 😂GM and Ford were pretty close in quality control standards but Chevy made there vehicles 20% more then ford in those years that’s why GM cars trucks were made better then compared to now
The casing wires they put on brake lines make them rust and fail faster. I never liked them. The suspension isn't what absorbs everything you encounter in a truck - another grand Chevy failing. This video is comparing 1972 Chevys to earlier models of other brands. Roofs like in a chevy rust out. That is why absorbant material is used instead of metal inside. I also like how they obviously poke holes in different heights in the truck beds. Lame comparisons to earlier models.
@lawnmowermanlawnmowerman9930
4 жыл бұрын
As a work vehicle the GM trucks were no match whatsoever to the Fords of the day. The Chevy was more of a beefed up car whereas the Ford was a dedicated truck through and through. I don't need Google or You Tube to tell me this,I was working and driving these very same models of trucks back then working on the farm and with my dad's waterwell drilling company. The GM's did ride and drive a little better,but the Fords were the tough as nails work trucks in those days and today as well. There's a reason that the F150 is the sales leader.
Who was the film made for? Dealers? Customers?
local garage has a 57 with the big back window 283 cid and 4 speed sweeet truck
in my experience from working in junkyards and seeing many old vehicles ford makes a better quality vehicle than g.m. the paint and body build quality is usually higher . and the twin i beam is a better suspension system for a truck than the unequal length control arm set up that g.m. uses . it may not corner quite as well because it lacks a anti roll / stabilizer bar , but the advantages outweigh that . it is simpler and gives more wheel travel than any other type . that is why it is used on 2WD race prerunners . and another bad thing about the g.m. pickups is that when it is has a V8 the engine is placed so low in the frame . again the advantage of having a slighty lower center of gravity because of that is outweighed because it is a lot harder to service the engine . and the ford 9" rear axle that is used on the half ton models is better than a g.m. 10 or 12 bolt model that is used on the C 10 . the g.m. rear ends retain the axle with only a circlip that sometimes breaks and when that happens you lose the whole axle and wheel with it . and the the ford 9" is what is called a " removable differential type axle " you can remove the differential without taking out the axles like you have to do on the g.m. spicer type axle
@chargermaster3716
4 жыл бұрын
warren buchanan GM And Ford were pretty close and neck to neck in quality control in those years today Ford over takes Chevy in quality control GM Quality has been going down hill for decades now Ford Quality has been going up in the last decade or so
what was the price difference of the models shown?
Whoa on the gas mileage differences between them, also, comparing a Jeep competitor to a full size truck with a wagon body, entirely different markets.
I have considered that both Chev & Ford built good pickups during the early 70's. If you wanted a 6 the Ford 300 was the best bet but both manufacturers offered a good selection of V8's. Chev's 350 & 400 autos were very good & Ford's best auto was the C6. Both offered pretty fair 4 speeds & Ford had a slightly better selection of differentials. .
They left out the torque hop of the coil spring rear suspension on backing up. Dodge seems to have fixed this problem on their new rear coil springs.
17:09☺️
Sold... Where's the nearest dealer?
OMG the dummy bouncing up and down 😂😂 just imagine being him
I want a blazer!
if you needed it to start every time you bought a Chevy. Ha Ha Ha!
Chevrolet this, Chevrolet that. Had a '69 F100 two tone long bed back in the late eighties in high school. Loved that truck!! Ford still kicked chevys ass by selling 26,000 more trucks from 67-72 models.
@danwelch699
4 жыл бұрын
Only because price was cheaper. How come I dont see those 26000 fords now?HAHAHA.
I will pay full msrp for a Cheyenne Super 10 in blue and white. 350 and 4 speed.
Back when American auto makers put quality over shareholder profits.
Vid is going to implode , 666th like.
17:10 ...you're welcome.
@reggiechapman7275
2 жыл бұрын
Thank you
That was the true Chevy truck.
Both of those generation pickups were built from 1967 through 1972. The Chevy is a second generation C/K series pickup & the Ford is a fifth generation F-series pickup.
I'm a Ford person but this is the only Chevrolet that they ever made that was worth a crap
Had a 70 ford xlt but all brakes were shoe type.
At. 12:30. Galvanized exhaust system....only thing on the blazer that doesnt rust......the BLAZER is bigger..I would not put it in the same category as the BRONCO
@AmericanHandgunner44
4 жыл бұрын
This was before the bronco was really a full size truck
Wow gm had dumb commercials back then to but at least they were well built